#sk-lore
1 messages · Page 460 of 1
It’s literally only called genderless after getting kings brand
Tamar of Georgia was not only King but was so good at it that she was called King of Kings by the time her reign was over
Allegory and the literal are blurred in Hollow Knight's universe that's the entire point of Mask Maker
No its not
Yes it is
Proof
It faced the Gendered Child? She's a fierce foe, strong in mind and body, striking reflection of her mother, though the two were permitted little time together.
I never begrudged the Wyrm's dalliance as bargain. In fact, I feel some affection for the creature birthed.
If your paths were ever to align, I imagine you might gain yourself a powerful ally.
no, that masculinity is a social construct that exists in your head
we can just as easily ascribe feminine features
not to mention that some things considered masculine now were feminine 200 years ago
Hornet is THE gendered child
That's her title yeah
because she's the only one of all the PKs children with a gender
Sure wonder why they would bring up her unique nature as a gendered being right after getting the king's brand
Im not saying thr feminine cannot be masculine or vice versa. Im saying that in some form, even if that form changes or the definition shifts, it will always be there.
To show that despite being king, tk is still genderless???
Why would they call it a gendered term then
Because it’s the authority that matters
Because "king" is a title, not always gendered itself
What if it was queens brand
idk you tell us
Queen is inherently gendered
what would the knight start doing
Unlike king
Why are the Mantis “Lords” female
the queen didn't create the brand lol
Lord isn't nearly as gendered as the term king
clearly it would lose all capacity for responsibility heroism and leadership
Why is king not gendered but queen is????😂
Because that's how words were developed
Because king is a role and queen is the female word of that role
King is masculine and queen is feminine its not that hard to understand
Yes I agree
Similar to how waiter isn’t gendered but waitress is
These are the same developers who deliberately avoided calling The Knight "prince", by the way
Yeah so if they specifically avoided calling the Knight any gendered terms then mayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyybe just maybe that means their use of "king" in this setting and context also isn't gendered
Prince is not inherently gendered
But TC removed it because it was gendered
besides, the brand marks the bearer as taking the role of a king it doesnt change their gender identity.
Would they not do the same for the related term king
Because in the context of the setting it's not gendered
Like the answer is right there
hollow knight fans cant read
Now why would that be the case
who could have seen this coming
Because they decided that's how they wanted their fictional setting to work
A creator wanting to create their setting a specific way is not "no reason"
Your questions are dancing around a point you don't want to admit
The point being?
The Knight is genderless, the use of "king" in the setting is supposed to represent the authority of the position without implying anything about gender
I'm just assuming words work the same way they do normally
You're the only one assuming stuff to debunk this theory which you have a strange vendetta against
Why do you assume real-life "English after being fucked for centuries by misogynistic nobles obsessed with being French" conventions have to apply to a fictional setting created in the 2010s?
Why does that have to be "normal"?
We generally assume words mean the things that they are agreed upon to mean
are we still on this
That's how language works
Why can't they go "hmm, there have been a whole bunch of examples of women being called kings so we'll use that as a non-gendered term in our setting"?
what is happening 💀
what is the theory again? ive been in and out of this chat in between boss attempts
Kings throughout history , have mainly referd to a masculine identity. There have been queens who have ruled without kings as well. One is not better than the other lol.
The Knight getting branded as king represents its transformation into a masculine icon willing to accept its emotional nature (Void Heart) instead of repressing it with toxic masculinity like The Hollow Knight did
I'm not ascribing value in the terms of which is "better," I'm simply pointing things out
..
what?
so wait what is the theory??
That
That'd be pretty clumsy writing
no offense
The King's Brand is titled as the King's Brand because it marks the owner as King, and us possessing it does not change it's name or purpose. It is described as marking the bearer as king, and anyone who bears it shall be titled the king of hallownest. Anyone, not just vessels, not just males, any being.
Anyone being able to claim it is made up
so.... transmasc knight?
In a sense
Hornet could have taken mantle of the King's Brand but chose not to, because she knew it wasn't her role to play
She's the gendered child
she guards it
what the fuck is this discussion
because she's the only of the pale king's children to have a gender/sex
the vessels don't have a gender
omfg
the knight cant have an emotional nature at all
or its replacement of the hollow knight wouldnt work
Yeah it doesn't
well, that kinda goes against the whole point of the game as all the vessels not being hollow, and why the vessel plan failed.
"I have to have wings otherwise I couldn't jump off a skyscraper"
The vessels having no emotion is a myth
yea we've said that like 50 times but these two refuse to see reason
That's a deliberate detail they added
It has nothing to do with her being gendered, it has to do with her not being able to enter the Black Egg and enter THK's dreams to summon the void in order to destroy Radiance. King's Brand isn't a neat collectible memento in the game, it's what you need to enter the Abyss and claim the Voidheart which allows the void to be controlled.
Why is that if not to tie into the King's Brand
??
The vessels aren't pure, which is why they fail
our knight isn't pure either
well, we know they arent empty, that they all have wills, that doesnt neccesitate emotion, while i generally agree they have emotions, it could be argued the emotion aspect was the "idea instilled" by the pale king. but again i don't generally read it that way.
they're all hollow, but none of them that we've seen have actually been pure
Why would they make their main character genderless and then apply gendered language onto them if not to make a point
It won't work, that's the point of it being the base "bad" ending and you needing to earn better ones
The idea instilled isn’t the cause of THK’s impurity though HK fans just can’t read
Give evidence of the Knight being referred to with gendered language outside of "king" (which isn't gendered in this context anyway) at any point in the game after getting the King's Brand
there is 0 gendered language other than "King," and nobody refers to the Knight as masculine before or after obtaining the King's Brand, only noting that it now has the title. King, as much as you're trying to force it, is NOT an exclusively male title.
Show the Knight being referred to as "he"
either way, the knight is still genderless
They all get ideas instilled. And none of them can hold the infection forever. The pale kings hope for them is a lie, because he went about achieving an "emotionless state " incorrectly
"Give evidence besides the evidence I chose to ignore for no reason"
Great argument dawg
King is a conventionally gendered title
”incorrectly” or you know maybe it’s just not possible
So you have none, thanks for confirming
Because King doesn't mean Guy, ESPECIALLY given this context
because the evidence in question is questionable at best
Its not
"I implore you, usurp the Vessel. Its supposed strength was ill-judged. It was tarnished by an idea instilled. But you. You are free of such blemishes. You could contain that thing inside." is the line im referring to, though i believe the white lady is incorrect here its still a line in the game that people read, i don't really fault them for taking it as truth.
the fact that the individual its used on was never male
They deliberately went about removing references to TK as prince but not king for some reason???
"All apples are red, that's what being apples means." "Here are examples of apples being other colours like yellow and green." "No those are all red because I said so."
"TC just used a word incorrectly because uh I said so"
One could argue that the player chracters state of forgetting everything and having no connections is the state, but that is disproven by him coming to care about hornet throughout the game. As proven by Godhome Nosk.
So yes I agree
They didn't call TK a prince because being prince of Hallownest meant precisely fuck all, having the King's Brand is what mattered because it gave access to the Abyss
Historically speaking, the term King actually isn’t always gendered. Some countries have used it interchangeably for rulers of both genders. Most notably Queen Elizabeth I, while referred to as Queen, used the Rex title instead of its feminine counterpart. There are other examples throughout history.
I don't know how you can in good faith assert that king isn't gendered
There have been female King's before, and many cultures use the term of King, or a term that is synonymous with it, for female rulers
This isn't the olden times the word isn't being used in an archaic context
yea we've brought those up
they got ignored
Because it isn’t always gendered irl lmao, and in the context of HK it’s clearly also used as a gender neutral term stop pretending this is completely unprecedented
Your historical examples aren't going to handwave away the gendered child dialogue haha
TK obtains the King’s Brand because it’s the Brand of the Pale King stop being intentionally dense
The world has had female kings (not queens) as late as the 19th century, and you'd probably see more if it wasn't for a whole bunch of European countries deciding to be republics
Oh so we're stooping to insults now
the gendered child dialogue contradicts you
I wonder if its more intended as the vessels not having emotions at first, but developing them as they interact with those of the kingdom. Not something im certain of, but Its certainly interesting.
No it doesn't
Do we live in the 19th century
im gonna get a fucking anneurism
Everything I disagree with is ragebait
Do we live in Hallownest?
there is more likelyhood of hornet being void than of the knight being male
Hallownest's setting is told to us through MODERN english
They could've chosen the word monarch but they didn't
The King's Brand marks the bearer as King. It's the King's Brand. That makes the bearer King. Bearer. Not male. Nowhere in the description does it describe anything to do with the male sex or gender identity, and a title that is put upon a person will not change that.
HORNET IS VOID CANON
barely, theres a lot of fanciful and archaic language
Maybe if you had the mental faculties to actually respond to what anyone was saying in a coherent manner I’d have reason to be more charitable
(also modern english emerged in the 1700s so)
King is usually used for men
Modern English dates back to between the late 14th and 17th centuries depending on your exact definition so sure, anything from then is valid
If your level of understanding is quite literally being illiterate I have good reason not to engage lmao
but not exclusively
No it doesn't
"Usually" or "always" (hint: it's not the second one)
We don't talk like people from back then
ok why are we discussing the gender oif the pale king?
That litteraly is what happens
is this discussion just going in circles
Yet you still are. Does winning the internet argument matter that much to you?
and the characters don't talk like us
they use fanciful and archaic language
We attempted to give proper input and respect to you, one with a clearly much lower level and understanding, but you have forcibly denied any arguments or evidence we've provided.
so i have a question, if hornet takes the king mark, would that make her transition to male?
That doesn't give you the OK to break the rules
She can't take the mark because she's already gendered, TK isn't
Usually, not exclusively. The item makes the bearer King. It is not specific to our character, and the name of the item itself is the King's Brand, regardless of who claims it.
White Lady says THK’s SUPPOSED strength was ILL-JUDGED. It was NEVER pure that’s literally what she says, if the idea instilled were the cause of this she would have said THK’s actual strength was aptly judged, and WL is not “incorrect”
i don't see how the mark couldn't change her gender
not really explicitly, they could have always had them, its not really easy to tell with creatures that cant speak or emote. I personally think new information in silksong is what most implies this reading, as lore tablets refer to the void as ridding bugs of emotion.
Yeah? Doesn't contradict what I said
if it can rearrange the ghost body to be male it can pretty much do the same to hornet
English is not a prescriptive language like French, there is no central government authority that decides what "real English" is
I more read it as it's strength was ill judged before it was actually put to the task of the sealing, as the idea was instilled past that point.
But that’s not what she says
Also the only edge cases where king is used to refer to women/other genders is either A) in an archaic sense or B) to defy gender norms neither of which really make sense in this case
also, wouldn't this make the ghost trans
And if that were the case its actual (not supposed) strength would still have been aptly judged at one point
that would be peak imo
But rhe vessels are not exclusively void is the thing. They have pale shells infused, and can channel the things they absorb.
So i think they always had emotions
But words still hold meaning
I mean she follows up saying its strength being ill judged with a line about the idea instilled, it reads to me as her elaborating on why its strength was ill judged
even then the french hate L'academie francaise. ive seen french people describe it as the place they send insufferable linguists to get them out of the way
this may be the final boss of bad faith arguments going on in the background.
@maiden relic Where’s the lore
You said you were gonna say about it
what’s the analysis of this topic
The meanings can be vastly different even for the same word even in countries that speak the same language
The item is called the King's Brand no matter who bears it. If a female royalty were to claim it, would they suddenly be made a guy JUST because they're King? Would a genderless person capable of claiming it be forced to become male because of the title of King? Or would it follow the common naming convention of ACTUAL HISTORY that has REPEATEDLY shown women and non-male people can still be called King?
So
yeah but they seem to be just void inhabiting dead shells, their "deeper form" as the mask maker calls it is pure void.
If a female royalty were to claim it, would they suddenly be made a guy JUST because they're King?
Nope, because they can't claim it
Would a genderless person capable of claiming it be forced to become male because of the title of King?
Yup, that's the entire narrative reason behind the vessels being genderless
the argument that our knight is suddenly forced to identify as male just because of it's ownership of the King's Brand, making it the King of a dying kingdom where it takes no action as a ruler is ridiculous
There is 0 evidence to either of these points
The actual action it takes as a ruler is irrelevant
also there are like
dozens of reasons hornet might not be able to take the kings brand, i really doubt "being a woman" is it
If you assume words don't mean what they mean, sure
whats the line where hornet says she cant claim the kings brand? i havent read it in a while
Hornet says that it is a mark for "one like you," which implies Vessels, but doesn't suggest anything to do with gender, so that doesn't matter
we are literally never told that women cant claim it, youre making that up for your own argument
i think it appears after the knight stands he is happy with his transition
Why is Hornet the gendered child then
And why does she say "One like you"
There's a clear contrast between the two
or the offspring of two pale beings, or at the very least one who isnt half mortal as she is
erasing enby representation but wokely
is like the whole bi vs pan war
Is Hornet a vessel of void, yes or no?
Sure, but the shell itself probably acts as a mask that's shaping thier "person". This is likely what allows them to develop in some capacity. And only The Knight and THK seem to poses any care or "will" because they were capable of experiencing the world. Its a catch 22 in my eyes, no vessel can become pure if they were taken out of the abyss and gain experince. Bassicaly , schordingers cat just becomes a cat when you take it out of the box/temporal state.
Why would only a void being be able to claim King's Brand
What does claiming the King's Brand allow the Knight to do?
And secondly... what the fuck do you mean that's the narrative reason? Where is this stated? Where is this even hinted towards? Give us specific quotes from team cherry or ingame dialogue that explicitly hints towards or says that the narrative reason the vessels are genderless is specifically so they could become male by becoming King, WHICH IS NOT A ROLE THAT IS EXCLUSIVELY MALE, JUST PREDOMINATELY IS
Take responsibility for the kingdom
And?
And visit the abyss but you don't need to be void to do that
Unless you want to assume PK is void
fish used to be believable
And what does the Knight do in the Abyss?
PALE KING VOID CANON
Because she had a gender and is the child of the pale king, and is the ONLY one of his children to have a gender. Which is why she is called the gendered one. BECAUSE SHE'S THE ONLY ONE
Many things none of which are very relevant
Now why would that be the case
Why would all vessels be genderless from a narrative standpoint
someone yesterday said moorwing was based on a fish
i mean, their corpses with very poor concept of social relationships and identity
you're conveniently ignoring that the mentions of hornet as the gendered child in relation to the kingsbrand are only in relation to the fact that she's the one guarding it
not about her inability to claim it
So
actually speaking of fish what the fuck are kai supposed to be
how exactly is that going to develop a "gender"? and if talking about the sexual gender, they are literally CORPSES, covered or most likely replaced by void
The context is still relevant
They are relevant, answer the question
Because the vessels are shells hollowed out by Void. They are constructs, made from Void. They lost their lives and identity as real children. They are hollow, empty. They don't need genders because they are empty husks full of Void.
Vessels are fully sapient
we have to wonder if star is baiting us, who is baiting star
There is no reason a void creature would be incapable of developing a gender
if we are simply fish, is she too a fish? is there always a larger fish?
why would they suddenly grow one because of a title
Its figurative
or is there a largest fish who acts on hunger alone
They are creatures that were killed, hollowed out, and given sentience with Void. They HAD a gender when they were born, sure, but that life isn't them, because that life is gone and replaced by Void.
and yet you keep insisting that the knight is a man now
TK needs to accept its status as a masculine icon to get King's Brand in the first place that's pretty standard thematics
Just like how it needs to accept its nature to get Void Heart
"Why would Void Heart make it accept its nature"
Vessels are sapient beings who interact with society
would that mean when it equips the glowing womb it becomes female to take onto it's mother icon?
They should be capable of forming a gender
literally what are you talking about
is the knight ever gendered as masculine beyond the use of king
"Accept it's status as a masculine icon to get King's Brand"
No but don't fall into the trap of ignoring it being called a king for no reason
except they dont. they dont take on any inherently masculine traits or behaviours
Nobody explicitly calls the Knight King
HK is a metaphor for toxic masculinity
THK literally tried repressing its emotions to be strong
TK doesn't do that thus its the foil for toxic masculinity (positive masculinity)
royal retainers
Its branded as king
where do you think white lady falls into this thematically
Characters only remark on you possessing the king's brand, or that it has been claimed, but never call tk King
its implied they think the knight is the actual Pale King no?
That’s not true
The royal retainers are not talking to tk
not sure where that's implied
what does she represent
I heavily disagree with star here but that isn’t true
Women can encourage toxic masculinity too
I'm not sure about anything beyond that, its an interesting question
what about zote
where does a living character specifically refer to TK as King, as specifically calling them King
Look man, I just though THKs design was masculine. I don't actually care about all the other stuff lol.
actually thats too easy
Steel Soul Jinn
don't really see the masculinity in their design tbh 😭
Zote is another example of toxic masculinity like how the Slab and Bilewater are both representations of the cycles of abuse
...A King, the tiny It becomes. Jinn knows that mark, but cannot bow.
Jinn's masters are other... minds other... Not order. Not order, they seek.
Thank you
I’m not trying to help your ragebait ok
based and say-whatever-the-fuck-you-want-about-transgender-people-to-justify-the-initial-vibes-you-picked-up-pilled
In your headcanon*
i mean, is hard to differentiate gender in this game aswell, they are bugs
???
What?
we haven't seen any bug with boobs yet
That's your decision
i think...
or as I like to call it: interpretation
Calling THK masculine based off of design is weird but I don't think its much to do with trans people
to blatantly dismiss the ideas being presented is a bit narrow-minded, I don't necessarily agree but it's an interesting thought
Forgot about this, mb
This arguement is so stupid lol
i love how even when it calls it king, it never calls it "He" separating the gender from the king status
I dismiss the ideas when they are blatantly incorrect or are making up the existence of ideas and themes represented. A large part of the argument hinges on King being an excusively male title, which it is not. Everything else is just hogwash about how things in the game are actually metaphors for things based personal own views, with little to no actual evidence or reasoning as for why it's the case.
Specifically refers to TK as It in the same sentence as acknowledging it as becoming a king
exactly, it's so obvious the game is not trying to connect the king with the male in any way
Devil's advocate: Hornet is also referred to as "It" by a steel being
the idea being presented is that being called king is enough to turn the knight from genderless into a man
what does dung defender tell us about toxic masculinity
don't play with dung ig
Being a simp means you're literally playing with poop
that too many men refuse to wipe their ass..
Masculine, not a man but whatever. Idc
or do? considering he is pretty much one of the best ending of a royal knight
gloombeast explicitly said the knight becomes a man
"Being a ruler can never be feminine"
I didn't say that
pale king is not exactly much masculine tbh
But like why couldnt it be called rulers brand then? Monarch exists as a word too
💀
<@&283547423706447872> free money
this shitshow of a debate wouldn't be complete without one of these scams
IT DOESNT EVEN HAVE A LINK WHATS EVEN THE POINT
bait
I think it has a website in the images or some shit
free money, that's the point
obviously its like an ip grab tho
perhaps a link could be blacklisted
good point
The void is actually a metaphor for idiot rich people putting their money in crypto until it destroys the environment and their souls
or otherwise difficult for bots to post
dumb bots, that's why ia sucks
Like if we did some plotswap where GMS ruled hallownest and Pale king ruled pharloom, I think it would be called "Monarchs brand"😂
damn I missed out
if second sentinel painted a picture would it be ai art?
what does zemer teach us about toxic masculinity
to avoid it entirely by dating women
Masculine woman is badass?
but you both die in the end so whats the point
i'm not sure
It would be called Queen's Brand and only because GMS explicitly gendered herself, and there would be no argument about Hornet not being able to claim it because she's also a gendered woman
i'm surprised art is not a big thing in pharloom considering the amount of silk for pencils
well gms is always referred to as monarch not queen
Pale king is male tho
pale king a dumb tho
weirdly enough Zi reders to herself with gendered pronouns, but seems to refuse to do so for Hornet or Sula
perhaps its because the "steel children" as hornet calls them see organic creatures as lesser
Pale being sre a dumb tho
i want the next game to focus on the steel city just so we can get more lore on all of this
fuck those organics
Yeah The hollow knight as the main chracter of a steel city game
(many #sk-lore enthusiasts disagree because "it dumb" or "Muh cannon")
Why did they cut her king's brand dialogue
I will not rest until I see em bashing the heads of giant bugs in Kratos style
no the hollow knight wouldnt make any sense
oh i just read the dialogue its stupid nvm
what does midwife teach us about toxic masculinity
but it would fit right in with silksong actually
a new player character
could be a former npc again
TC just lost their filter for dumb stuff as time went on
Ok then how do you propose you resolve the clifhanger of embrace the void.
You cant say "you don't lol"
eat the grapes of granting reading comprehension
They made an exception to the rule that's unsatisfactory for no reason then?
Thats dumb
if one of the godhome endings becomes canon it should be the delicate flower
it's tonally weird but like obviously shade lord just goes home right
Frankly its baffling they even decided to acknowledge its existence
Nah its hype i don't care lol
what else would it do
while interesting, playing with the hollow knight is just hard
if anything silksong reinforces the idea that it would leave hallownest alone
altough, considering the size of the steel city characters, it might work
this being said the blackbarrens and sandsea waste do also interest me a lot
the only good thing about the writing in sotv is that it makes etv a little bit less bad
How would thk even fit in the map
I don't disagree. All I want is for team chery to resolve the embrace the void clifhanger.
what 💀
And the flower ending dosent interfere
sandsea could be a name for that endless desert between kingdoms
thk would be good material for a hollow knight sequel in 20 years if they made a higher being shrink it down to baby size or something
compression?
TC when they have to put an ending behind a random sidequest that circumvents the main climax of the game for no reason
silksong havent even been finished and you already want a sequel
you don't even need to kill the dreamers that's how disconnected it is 😭
The shades also just go home in the normal ending
i want anything that gives me lore
oh when you talk about the cliffhanger do you mean thk being alive
i didnt consider that idk that it's a cliffhanger
Why do they frame it that way with the buildup and music in the cutscene then
idk but hornet would kick its ass so it doesnt really matter
Untrue, litteraly every other ending ends off with a mellow conclusion Embrace the void does not
If it concludes in an ending, contains multiple percentage points, leads to several achievements, and contains tons of game content.. i wouldn't say it's still a "sidequest"
It doesn't adequately resolve the game nor do percentage points achievements or game content matter to the narrative
We don't know if they fought or not after its unclear.
well yeah but if they didn't it's not a cliffhanger and if they did it's not a cliffhanger
still not a sidequest 🤷♀️
Its always hype moments and aura after Hidden Dreams when TC miraculously became bad writers*
TRUE
Its not part of the main quest it wasn't even in the base game
It’s 100% a side quest.
Thus the point is, its a clifhanger because we don't know what happens and it actively posees that question.
Im also including silksong endings. And im talking about the final thing you see in each ending dosent nesscarily set things up. They are soft conclusions not cascading questions.
Like what happens after twisted root? Everyone fucking dies.
What happens after sister's of the void? Idk hornet and lace leave
ETV doesn't pose interesting questions it just gives the detail that THK is alive like ok
Embrace the void? Who the fuck knows because THK is a wild variable.
Ok can you accurately predict what would happen after it?
kills itself hopefully
We don't know it would because we don't know what its present state is
Do you see what I mean? Its meant to be a wild card ending that gets you wondering what the fuck is going to happen
Every other ending, even in silksong is obvious.
Sure but its kinda an empty cliffhanger there's nothing interesting they can really do with it
Well that remains to be seen
nothing is particularly wrong with this
i actually think the hollow knight is like
okay, that's what lace 2 dialogue makes me think
It makes for an unemotional ending very thematically disconnected from the rest of the game
godhome was an amazing dlc with an optional ending that did fit story wise
hornet talks about how the hollow knights life is life indeed, but why?
The resolution for the knight happens in the 4th pantheon.
That's part of the point of the first game
Red x emoji reaction of doom
technically its the best ending for all the characters, hornet, thk, and the dreamers are alive, the knight/shade lord are somewhere else due to the flower
you better not bring up that stupid fucking toxic masculinity shit again
what?
Godhome lets the knight deny everything that pepole tried to expect of it
godhome is one of the best dlcs ive ever seen personally
That's bad writing Hallownest should rest as is the point of the entire game
it is resting though?
Like he says fuck you to the pale king, and white lady and anyone else who would try to expect the outcomes that happen normaly
That is what DNM does but better
No hornet expects you to kill the radiance after a point
DNM actually has you facing the failure of the Kingom's preservation before fighting Radiance
That's what it does in Godhome
You cannot do godhome without seeing that either
Yes you can
And in godhome you actually RECONCILE with your siblings
THK is not in Godhome
canonically the knight probably did everything if we consider etv as an ending
the fact you can enter without dreamers is probably for game convenience
An uninfected prime version is with none of the emotional baggage
amazing fight representative of a false dream and a main theme of the game
You face his true burdens though in the view of pure vessel, which takes more effort.
none of the vessels were truly hollow
How does it represent the burdens any better
Pure vessel is the highest of THKS emotional bagage
You don't get to see how it failed
All the ceremony and preparations burdening it as seen at the start of pure vessels fight
You see the harness in THK too you also get to see it... actually chained up 
the pure vessel isnt even pure, thats the narrative part, he shows emotion during p5, its an amazing representation of what thk was like during hn's prime
THK isn't pure either
The only difference between the two is that one is failed the other is not (yet)
The knight probably knows this because the vessels all litteraly telepathically communicate in Pantheon 4 after you beat him
how is that any "better" narratively
etv and dnm represent different ideals, and thats fine
i dont understand your claim of wanting one objective ending
You have to face the failure of the kingdom's stasis right after dismantling everything else surrounding it
so all dlc endings are bad and invalid then?
In HK at least
😔
Maybe drop the ending bit all of HK's DLCs are pretty lackluster in terms of writing except for Hidden Dreams
I'm not sure what you mean by "invalid" though
You still do that in godhome. You litteraly have to dismantle every INCH of the past through beating every boss in the game AND getting voidheart
Most bosses have nothing to do with the actual past of Hallownest
The bosses relevant to the stasis are all mandatory afaik
If they died there in hallownests history its in hallownests past and is apart of the burden
most bosses in this game series are just randome dudes that are either two things
Angry
Hungry
Crazy
Artists
Most, but practically all are victims of the kingdom's fall and descent into the state it currently lies in. Even if they aren't directly related to it's causes, they are still a part of Hallownest, it's history, and it's decline
History is not only in its important parts
So
So they are apart of the burden of hallownests history???
TK doesn't need to beat up every dead person to see the stasis has failed thats absurd filler content
The point is he cares enough to go the extra mile and learn everything about everyone
i don't think it does it on purpose
Which isn't really relevant
it just wanderers around and fight whoever is aggresive
So, even if the bosses aren't related to the past, these bosses are still a part of hallownest and it's failures, so you are facing through all of hallownest's history and failures and the results of the failures of the pale king out upon the common bug
Every inch of hallownest is relevant to some part of its history and is affected by its fall
Thats what makes the game good is that attention to detail
Hey guys, here's a question. What if there's nobody around Hornet when she is playing the Elegy of the deep? Wouldn't she just descend into her own memories?
but...you don't need to see all of that for the ending to work its all meaningless filler to pad out the boss rush 🥴
That might be something they add in the future
You can play the Elegy at any time and it only activates when there's a heart to resonate with
i dont even think this is necessarily a problem, grimm troupe tries to be a parallel to the main story
Yeah, that's right, but wouldn't Hornet have a heart that could resonate with it?
it just fails because it frames breaking the cycle as the quick and easy path and nobody wants to do it because nkg is gas
"Sure in P5 you don't get to see the actual culmination of the fall of Hallownest but you do get to beat random animals and dudes up for 30 minutes that were affected by it"
She's arguably much more powerful than any of the heart creatures
You need to kill every boss in the game to do it though. And the extra mile to care about every part of history IS the narritive point and let's the knight even defy hornets expectations.
Its not a problem yes but it does mean this point about ETV is kinda nonsense
almost like it's the final challenge and a boss rush that combos the previous boss rushes. It's a challenge, not every detail needs to be put under a lore lens. P5 wouldn't be nearly as hard or as interesting if it was literally JUST the bosses you deem "important" and "not filler." it's supposed to be a boss rush of every boss in the game.
It has literally nothing to do with hornet's expectations but ok
It would be a great way to implement Pantheons
It wasn't just the creatures themselves, it was the collective power of their respective kingdoms that those creatures inherited. Hornet rejected inheriting the collective power of a kingdom, so it does not work for her
Hornet expects you to kill radiance after a certain point. She dosnet expect you to find a diffrent way to do it.
Hmmm, it actually makes sense
OK so you're talking about gameplay and I'm talking about lore and only one of those things is relevant in #sk-lore
Are you guys talking about cannonical status of the endings?
no
No I'm just talking about why I dislike ETV
Its ludonarative. The gameplay and lore compliment what is being acomplished
Both DNM and ETV are canon
Why does the citadel have a bunch of gauntlets
No, she's talking about tc being bad writers and that etv is bad writing and a terrible ending
For now, yeah
i heard there was a lore reason
Because it sgot alot of dudes
Incidentally it also requires you to actually engage with that deeper power in some way. You can't use the elegy on Khann until you take the conchcutter, you can't use the elegy on Karmelita or Green Prince until you actually talk to them first (and actually Karmelita has a second song she sings when you play the Elegy before talking to her that isn't her normal Needolin song!)
Oh, I remember this convo
GMS wants to kill you
Why is it terrible, in short?
it just has nothing to do with the plot
You're talking about the implications of p5 not making sense by having you fight every single boss. You can't only look at lore, gameplay still matters.
it's tacked on
You can ignore the main quest and circumvent the main climax of the game by skipping THK
Yes, I've noticed that actually about Karmelita. That's interesting
Are you responding to me?
You cant ignore getting voidheart
And in fact getting voidheart is required
im responding to why is etv bad yeah
I'm not talking about whether P5 is fun (HK bosses mostly aren't good so no) I'm talking about the narrative the two are irrelevant
the problem is most of the new godhome bosses are cool
like where would you put them otherwise
What do you mean skipping THK?
Pantheon 5 only introduces 3 new bosses one of which is Winged Nosk the others are just rematches you could put in Hall of Gods 
vengefly king crest
Ohhh you mean like without getting DNM?
Yea
or killing the dreamers
i mean all the other pantheon final bosses
all of them are pretty cool
You have to do litteraly everything right up to finaly entering the black egg temple so you litteraly miss nothing
But is it in any way related to the lore, if you're tying it to gameplay progression?
You can't only talk about the narrative and say the pantheon doesn't make sense to have all of the bosses, because the gameplay is based on fighting all the bosses. You can't force the narrative to fit your needs by changing the gameplay dramatically and then saying the gameplay doesn't matter.
Those are whatever from a lore standpoint
yeah but like their gameplay is cool so like how do you balance it
having all the bosses in the pantheon is neutral as a writing decision
maybe nailmasters couldve been a shakra or garmond type duel
The fact that lore should not take priority over gameplay doesn't change the fact that the lore DID SUFFER because it took a backseat to gameplay
it adds and subtracts basically nothing it just makes it exhausting to reach the ending
Honestly I agree there's a problem with how easy it is to get to Pantheons, but frankly, I would argue, that it's hightly unlikely that somebody would beat Pantheon 5 without beating the game first
Fighting filler bosses with late-game gear for like 20 minutes isn't particularly fun
It really dosent though. You are taking on litteraly the entire past of hallownest INCLUDING THKS. Rather than you JUST taking on THKS in DNM.
Lategame HK hands you iframes on a silver platter every 3 seconds which doesn't help
I would also argue that Pantheon 5 it's the hardest thing in the game, at least imo
i mean yeah i agree with most of that but the issue for me is where do you fit in the good bosses
hall of gods is kinda silly on its own
You need to get voidheart and beat every boss to do the pantheons though tf you mean its easy???
i guess some games do have stuff like that but idk
Hall of Gods would be a fine bonus challenge
That's really all it is anyways its not the meat of HK
i mean the question for me then becomes what do you do with all the time given to you by not making the rest of godmaster
work on silksong?
Making Silksong good
shrue
Yeah I mean work on silksong sure
if this was the intent it's still weird to make you fight all of these things that again have nothing to do with why hallownest fell
it's a bad replacement for the thk fight
They already started silksong as a DLC concept right alongside finishing godmaster. It wouldn't have changed anything .
Well Godmaster still took dev resources
Inbetween 2017-2019 its scope was a dlc concept anyway
true true
Because the plan was diffrent
the history and story of hallownest is tied to every bug, including all of the bosses. it isn't tied to just the important bits and pieces and the characters directly involved, it's about ALL creatures across the entire kingdom, which they do by having us battle all of the bosses, who are all victims of the failures of the pale king
tc the type of mfs to make you fight the entire zombie apocalypse before you have to find out how patient zero started 😭
i could see godmasters becoming like funny side characters similar to the steel masters
what am i saying 😭
Well I mean you don't need to fight THK and Radiance
my brain is fried
not sure how fighting massive moss charger ties into the failures of the pale king
well yeah it's easy to just say everyone is relevant but that doesn't make it well written
Yeah imo the only thing you can take in isolation in HK is Grim Troupe
i meant like have them play a similar role to the steel soul people
nah brocholius
where its a cool side thing
Grey Prince Zote has much to do with the failures of Hallownest aye
Pls no godseekers in Silksong
even then they probably influenced the radiance in some way since the nightmare heart resided in the dream realm once
But you do so in godhome anyway, and they even fulfill the same narrative purpose there
Honestly I will be pissed off if we get a literal godhome
well, kinda
I'm basically steelmanning the other person's argument
and hitting them with a sword doesnt mean facing the problems caused by the pale king if anything it's just doing something you've done before, but again
idk vengefly king doesnt seem relevant to the lore of hallownest
Which is that you can beat Pantheon 5 without beating the game frist
We won't really godseeker would be dead either way
Creatures of hallownest were all impacted by it. Every small bug, and since massive moss charger is a boss (an easy boss, but still a boss), it is included
How do we know?
Also, I just wanted to say, do you guys think we can say both ETV and DNM are both TRUE?
vgfocus is cool id rather tk turn into that in dnm than normal shade lord tbh
what does fighting every boss it's ever fought, in a row, do for the knight from a character perspective
Or just AS FAR AS WE KNOW RIGHT NOW?
what's meaningful about it
they're mutually exclusive
You effectively beat the game in your own right if you do pantheon 5 and get the same beats from THK
Yes
Nah, godseeker mode takes place after EtV according to its own dialogue. She's just trapped in godhome
but yes there's nothing stopping either of them from being canon on their own
combat experience to fight the sun
ok
(canon to silksong)
feels like they didn't have to make you fight everything if that was really the point they wanted to make
Yeah, honestly, I don't even know why I started arguing against what I said literally a minute ago i'm sorry 😭
thats cool when was this said
Does godseeker mode take place at all?
Thats werid as shit and dosent make sense to me but whatever. Shes like Simon from SOMA getting traped in the ARK😂
fighting everything isn't really the problem even if you only had to fight like 5 bosses it would still be ass because it circumvents the main story for no reason
if anything it weakens the idea, because you're getting tragic characters deeply affected by the infection thrown at you side-by-side with brooding mawlek and winged nosk
Unless we get THK somewhere in silksong. Unlikely but possible.
Fighting every single boss is for the gameplay, but that's just how they connect it to facing Hallownest's past. 90% of the bosses work under this idea, the rest are there because they need to be there to include every boss
the connection is flimsy tbh
like you're coming to a conclusion and working backwards to make it work
you fight all the bosses because they wanted a bossrush, not because someone thought it's a metaphor for the knight facing the kingdom's past
There is a reason. To deny the expectations placed upon you by like anyone. Because you are soing something no one thought of or expected of you.
Yes, but what I'm saying is that there should be only one cannon ending, when both of them are mutually exclusive. The only sound option for both of them to be cannon is if we'll never hear anything about Godseekers again, which basically would leave their status unknown
This is my same argument for THK
And in that case basically it's up to each individual to decide which one is cannon
other people were the ones talking about p5 relating to the kingdom's past, they then said it didn't make sense to have all of the bosses, so i was making a connection that semi-works
Its a catch 22 , you cant expound upon past ideas if something becomes definitively "oooo either can be cannon"
Yeah, if anything, I think ETV is a good ending, I'm not arguing against it whatsoever
if the knight ran into j robert oppenheimer in the junk pit and constructed the atomic bomb to kill the radiance you could make this exact same argument word for word
All endings are canon, they just don't all lead to silksong
YES
PEAK
I mean
I NEED THIS
but that'd be metal asf so yes.
it's a really easy way to pass off complete nonsense as good writing
Here's a fuller explanation
All endings show events that CAN happen
But only one shows what ACTUALLY happened in the story
Yes and thats based😎. in all seriousness he still respects THK as seen in Pantheon 4, so no not litteraly
Like Silksong Cursed ending shows what WOULD happen if the parasite takes over Hornet and GMS, but it doesn't mean it DOES actually happen
That's my explanation
Wdym?
I mean like
If we say there's only one timeline which includes all games and all content
i don't like talking about timelines n shit because media has shat all over that (fuck you marvel) but really that's what it is
Ill agree with you when team chery expound upon that ending with a followup in 29 years
all of the endings are canon, all of them happen, they just lead to different outcomes
sealed siblings is canon
it just doesn't lead to silksong
no it doesn't
there's not really any reason to assume that this condition exists
Cursed ending is canon, it just doesn't lead to act 3
act 3 and cursed ending are separate timelines or what have you
I mean that's pretty much what I said but in a big different way
It leads to different outcomes that we don't see happen
I just don't like calling other endings "alternative timelines"
Idk man that sounds like schrodingers hollow knight to me
unless explicitly stated by the text, there is no single canonical outcome
To me there's only one timeline with all content in order
yes, but there isn't a definitive "sacred timeline" that happens
problem is the variance in content, especially in act 3
that's not a thing
Well if there's a game about THK, then would there be a canonical outcome?
But guuuuys, like seriously, you don't think THK and Cursed are THE true endings, right..?
When pepole want cannon, they just want what happens in relation to another game
no, silksong follows certain HK endings but that doesn't decanonize the endings that it can't follow
we can craft that between etv and sotv, but that doesn't make them the true storyline, it's just the progression we know the most about as outsiders
Why is it not a thing?
true ending is really just a term for clarity's sake
if they wanted to, team cherry could make a third game that can only follow the sealed siblings ending
I just disregard all other timelines and only look at the one including all content that can logically happen in order
it doesn't clarify anything if it's inaccurate, it's a term for speedrunning categories
I know this. But im saying pepole don't care until there is actually enough things that follow up on each "Diffrent"outcome.
All endings are canon, they just cause different events, so sealed siblings is canon to the HK "universe" but isn't canon to Silksong, because something else happens
So it would be DNM/ETV -> Act 3 -> SofV
Yes, that's what I'm saying
that's the most progressed storyline yea
The term "alternative timeline" just drives me personally insane, I start imagining some multiverse type shi
same here
And I really hate to think about that being the case
it's just the accurate way of describing multiple possibilities of events that can all happen
Just wait until DLC says that Hornet using the Elegy was actually time travel and is what caused those kingdoms to fall to GMS in the first place god please no
LOL
Noticed this while watching a friend stream..
Wonder if Widow was one of these Weavers?
If we follow this logic, then a game about THK would be ETV->ACT 3-> SOTV
But they Could ALSO make a game that's DNM->ACT 3->SOTV about lace or some shit.
Guys, can you see how this would get really messy? 😭
it's explicitly stated she is
Oh shit
wait I misread mb
hornet is a weaver lol
Widow is a Weaver but not one of the ones who left for Hallownest and then came back
widow is not one of the weavers that left for hallownest
Aight
Please no hell nooo 😭
either way i don't think Widow is one of these weavers
Yeah its in the Weaver Den
Pls nooooo
well departing hallownest implies they were in hallownest at all, which widow wasn't
Yeah
hornet falls into a blackhole and manipulates everything in the past to lead to these exact events
widow shit talks hornet for being the child of one of the weavers who fled
I actually don't think they would btw. I've read some article quoting an iterview where TC said that if they ever make the third game you would be able to play and understand it without necessarily playing the first two, JUST LIKE Silksong, as they said
Idk, just the thought of knowing your family left their homeland behind, and wanting to return to it yourself, only to be met by being thrown in prison and killed by/for GMS
Like just. Damn..

Also, even though I know it's purposefully made ambigious, don't you guys think ETV would make more sense, since at least it's the only ending where we get to see the Shade Lord?
yea
Yeah one of the Godhome endings
I understand that it can theoretically happen in DNM either, it's just that... we don't get to see that..?
Yeah this one? I knowhttps://www.gamesradar.com/games/platformer/team-cherry-hopes-if-there-were-ever-new-hollow-knight-games-after-silksong-they-could-just-exist-alongside-one-another-so-the-order-you-play-them-doesnt-matter/
So that means Hollow is out and about somewhere
yes
they'd likely never confirm it one way or the other
Also I feel like DNM shows the opposite, doesn't it? The shades just look up and then go down
yeah they go down into the void
There's nothing even remotely suggesting they all decided to connect into a giant void entity at some point lol
the void entity isn't really there
DNM or likely the Godhome ending, given we see Ghost as the Shade Lord
there's nothing in silksong that conclusively says they actually did that
There's nothing saying they DIDN'T, we just don't get as much information
it's there and it isn't
where
very important lore piece btw
There was a screenshot clearly showing that there are SL's fangs in SOTV
stop acting so condescending
it's a hallucination, it doesn't just disappear between camera cuts for no reason
I'm sorry, I didn't want to be mean, but I've heard a lot of people saying that SL wasn't even there and it really triggers me, I'm sorry if it sounded condescending
But the sprite is the same as in ETV
it isn't there
gulp
There was a screenshot, I'll find it later
the shade lord and the army of siblings both appear in brief flashes and then in no other shots
I didnt get a screenshot of it, but it appears right here y'all
Flickers between Shade Lord and Ghost
Before that there's a hit sprite
little ghost 🥰
Like white hit range sprite
yeah and that hit sprite belongs to the knight's shade
you are overthinking this
isnt the army of siblings consistently there
No it doesn't
I was so happy to see them again dude
It looks exactly like the SL's hit
nope, you're getting them mixed up with the void tendrils
yes and why does this matter?
the shade lord and the knight are ostensibly the same character
but the knight isn't in the kaiju form in silksong's ending
Because it doesn't look like TK's sprite
i want to imagine Hornet was giddy with joy to see TK but just didn't really show it cuz of the high stress situation and confusion
Yes, but it's a different form
It means SL was there
Contrary to what some people argue
He might show up that way though, because the audio for the rending claws is the kaiju forms. He just then separates into his normal form.
TK doesn't have these curves
Because they don't have fangs
And there would only be one line
Again, because they don't have fingers
This is from SOTV
Groveta is saying you do see SL, but it's a hallucination and not necessarily the actual form appearing
Honestly seeing that ETV seems to be the canon ending, she was probably a mix of relived and terrified
Your sibling that went missing as the Infection finally died, presumed dead somehow. And you see them at last, and they save you from what otherwise would be a horrible death
I think "the knight shows up in shade lord form but only acts offscreen before disintegrating for no reason" is more of a stretch than "the knight shows up and stays in the same form the whole time"
not that you don't see the SL at all
I'm sorry, but I don't think saying "it's just a hallusination" is an argument
What proves it is?
The slashing animation is consistent with TK's tendrils
shade lord and the siblings are both visions experienced by hornet, showing either something that did happen or something that has the capacity to happen
Which are barbed
because it's impossible for her to have seen both
the fact that it only briefly flashes on screen
the siblings do not appear in embrace the void
and the shade lord does not appear in dream no more
Yeah we KNOW Ghost is physically there, they grab Hornet
idk i'm not arguing it i was just explaining Groveta cuz you thought they were saying the SL shape doesn't appear at all
Well, yes
But he uses the shade lords Claws to rend the tentacles. Mabye he isn't and you are right. But that motif of claws and power from the shade lord is still there, which is something only done IN ETV. In DNM he just slaps
no one's arguing against that
Why do you assume they are claws specifically
IDK, I dont know why they would be flickering between forms as a hallucination
Yeah, I'm not arguing only one of them is possible, I agree both can work, I'm just arguing that SL is there, regardless of which ending you think is cannon
They do in the pantheons 4 cutscene and all merge into the void
Not really the first shade lord hallucination in the series 
Basically what I'm arguing
A) Hornet wasn't there for that
B) They appear as vessels, not shades
The only way I could read it as such, is if its Hornet seeing Shade Lord and recognizing it as Ghost somehow
also please recall the order of the scenes shown in sister of the void
hornet sees the siblings, THEN the shade lord, then the knight sitting there by itself
she is not observing the process of the shade lord destabilizing, unless you want to argue that the knight goes in and out of shade lord mode TWICE in this cutscene
They might as well be the same in that context of the vission.. we hear the claws from the shade lord in SOTV though.
Im not saying he's full kaiju form
there's no reason this can't be ascribed to the knight's shade in base form
Im just saying that power is present and distinctly diffrent than what he can do in DNM
it wasn't used in DNM but team cherry hadn't made those assets when they made DNM
and that specific sprite and sound design is more instantly recognizable than the more generic tentacle slaps used in DNM
that's my assumption for why they chose to reuse it, anyway
True, but still
Again
I think ETV just shows us more
It would make more sense for it to happen imo compared to DMV
and again all hk endings are canon 💔
it doesn't really show us anything more required to understand silksong
Dream MV?? 😭
the only important thing is that the knight has the void heart
You COULD make the assumption he can do that stuff the whole time, but that's just weird
LOL
😭😭😭
What did you say?

it's less weird than assuming the knight was in shade lord mode at the start of the cutscene and then hopped out before the camera could look at it
Prolly
why would they frame the cutscene this way if the purpose was to explicitly show that it was the shade lord
But again, that is something he could totally do in the context.
My guess is to keep the “canon” ending of hk ambiguous
They could have used light slapping instead
yeah but it's a jackass way to communicate a story beat if true, so it probably isn't
So Hornet wouldn't be scared, pls it's done this way to make this moment more personal and emotional: THE knight faces Hornet
COULD, would be weird tho, and i think Groveta's description if what's happening is a lot cooler and makes more sense
Shade Lord is like.. all vessels connected together, even though they're controlled by the Knight, as it seems
given focus
Gore is no better 😭😭
but it's not censored
and i think the v version is worse lol
I think one of the purposes is that we would have this convo rn ahahha
Shade Lord Groal
💀💀
Depends imo, but let's not delve into that lol 😭😭😭
🐰⏱️
I'm cooked cause i know what this is
LMAO
world peace will be achieved when someone says smth in this channel that literally everyone agrees with
Sherma is HB
there are sherma haters out there
Hollow Knight is a game
no, it's an experience to play with connections
there are some who would disagree
Yeah hes my homeboy
Whoo???!!
i've witnessed them
😭
the freaks
I would disagree
Actually
Hollow Knight is not a game
It's a game franchise and a fictional universe 🤓
Hollow Knight is actually a character...
Real
Hollow knight is a misnomer because they were in fact not hollow
"Hollow knight is a metaphor for toxic masculinity" -literally ONE person
well they were hollow, they just weren't pure
hollow knight is a belief system
You could make a religion out of this
no wait don't
(elite ball knowledge btw)
How bout I do anyway?
The sun is a deadly lazzer
the most underrated aurafarmer
not anymore there's a blanket
<@&283547423706447872>
lmao I had a dream that the citadel was hiding a nation under a mountain that had same-sex marriage
Some of yall just be sayin ANYTHING lowkey
Wait wait wait
Does the green prince have his own heart and his lovers heart???
Isn't the heart you get are his and his lover's?
Either that or the citadel are weird enough to shove a heart into a cogwork
I have a theory: what if when we enter at the red memory hornet actually takes the last of live of the white woman(i dont remember her name sorry) since shes talking like she knows where we are and what is our objective she knows we are talking to her
And we took the flower from where her hearth is and strangely this flower doesnt break
Slabflies make me insane actually imagine being born into your ancestors’ guilt because of a sin they apparently committed against a divine spiderpeople race who secretly aren’t even actually divine. And you just have to live in filth and literally be a slave working as a jailer as your only opportunity to ‘redeem’ yourself and ‘atone’ for the sin you DIDN’T EVEN PERSONALLY COMMIT…
I personally think they deserved it i hate their atacks
And pls dont come with hornet wouldn't do that she killed 4 kings then took their hearths (one was still alive when she took it) she is a psycopath
And her plan failed too
"White woman" 🗣️🔥
I didnt remember her nqme because i play the game in spanish
Its ok I was just joking
I know
Frankly white lady being such a major character in the lore is just
I think they should add more lore to the game that isnt hide in a path of pain 2.0 for a 0.5milisecond scene that changes all lore(yes im talking about the first game)
I think the slabflies are often overlooked as being like gross and crude, when in reality they’re literally slaves. They’re victims of the citadel. Like full stop they are slaves. Everyone is so mean to them :(
Yeah also that they're in control
Basically they are just born to serve and suffer
ive lwk never noticed
hornet is either RACIST as shit or she's very angry
She is racist trust me she is a royalty girl man or girl whatever you are
Exactly!! Like their lives are hell and for WHAT? Because some weavers were upset by them? So they damned their entire bloodline for all eternity to be slaves ?? 😭
Also she says in the diary that she hated them with her life
The weavers are bad and good i think the only good weaver is herrah
I HATE weavers i HATE the citadel they ruin everything they touch
They only though of power
And literally hated the only man who wanted to help them (pale king)
Yep!
Nah at this point all weavers is bad
Weavers are a curse and a blight
Hornet too
If we think it
She is literally a psycopath who just kill everything in her path
Oh yeah hornet isn’t a good person. She begins her path to becoming a good person in like.. act 3
Phsntom the kid in constantly pain oh hell yeah why not killed her in the most painful eay
Way*
Ooh but killing lace the one who has being trying to kill us since the start nah she fine
I find it a bit ridiculous that fighting against pinstress results in hornet sparing her but if you fight green prince he just dies.
Leaving pharloom in peace ✖️
Let the void destroy all✅️
"No mind to think"
I could yap about the injustices of the citadel for ever but like everyone knows they suck 😭
Not even in that she killed 4 kings just to fix her mess and it didnt even fix anything
Fraudnet
TRUE
LOL
Hmm
I have another theory
I love the slabflies
They could never make me hate the slabflies they’re just victims
Why didnt the creators of the melodies stop all when they could do it like 50 years before ous
I personally think all lore should be behind 5 times harder paths of pain
They were all part of it
Honestly it would be fun
I did path of pain in 40 minutes at my tenth try
Why the FUCK do I need to pogo on fifty balljillion bugs for Mr. Mushroom
Someone is with me?
They were just part of all
They look too fat to move efficiently enough
They just watched them die but when it turned bad now they were good
Well thats true
They would just row to the citadel
Also
Dont you think that prince history
Sound too false
Like he changes all his history every single time
First
He say that they killed their boyfriend
It’s pretty consistent to me?
But then verdania and his boyfriend died way long ago thsn the citadel existed???
Thats too rare
I think he was vague so he doesn't have to think about it too much at the start
Where is it stated that verdania died before the citadel was established?
When you found him in the cave
He just says long ago. That doesn’t mean before the citadel. We literally don’t know how long the hauntings been going on, let alone when the citadel was established
They didn't the citadel betrayed them after one made his soul into the conductor dancers
He says "this cave was collapsed long ago"
I think its a translate error
Since in spanish
Probably
The citadel also collapsed long ago
Says it was before the citadel came
Maybe
Fair
He was harder thsn the prince
Btw karmelita difficult over galez
Glazdd
Glazed
It took me 2 tries
It took me more then 20