#help-43
1 messages · Page 55 of 1
Closed by @kind crane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
correct?
We'll see.
huh?
yes
Alright so, we have seen what was shown on the graph.
Can you tell me what function made this graphs?
@coarse verge
a quadratic
What type of quadratic function?
oh wait no, this isnt a quadratic
i dont think it matters what type of function this is
yep
so brackets
yea i think im right
quick, right?
what if it was trig?
You cant know that and it isnt relevant either
correct
Closed by @coarse verge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so basically i know how to do this
the hence part
but im wondering for the top part do i have to just find the derivative of sqrt(x) generally then move onto showing the hence part
or do i just go straight to the hence part and show its not right differentiable at x = 0
i dont have any mark schemes and its worth 4 marks if that helps
Hence means that you should conclude that from the main result
maybe im dumb but idk how id show the hence part after differentiating just generally
unless im confused on how to do the hence part
would i have to do first principles here
You should see that the limit at x=0 doesn't converge
I'm gonna criticize the question (not you OP) and say that the limit of f'(x) when x->0 doesn't say anything about right differentiability of f at 0
that might be what im saying
if i take the derivative of f(x) i get 1/(2sqrt(x)) which doesnt seem much help for the hence part
since i assumed id have to do first principle differentiation where x = 0
which gives lim h -> 0 of 1/sqrt(h)
then that shows it tends towards infinity unless im doing something wrong
That's exactly what I would have done
f'(x) when x->0 only relates to if f is C^1 (so it's about the continuity of the derivative)
When what we want is if f'(0) is defined
Closed by @pastel ice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
hey
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
No so piss offf boy
<@&268886789983436800>
What u gonna kick me
just wait till someone shows up so they can get rid of your ass
Ha loser

ok.
ok.
ok.
Well, that is a good option 
@verbal kiln how have you put your favourite game on discord
is it a nitro thing?
we have the same favourite game!
yes. 
Jackpot
awh boo discord!
Closed by @wheat pasture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i’ll take it!
thank you Chartbit!
this is their bio btw:
I’m quiet, I’m mysterious, I work in the night and sleep in the morning, I watch and observe like shadow
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am a bit confused with how the dirac delta works in context of ODEs
and laplace transforms
i needed to solve this ODE with laplace transform
and i got this (ugly ass) result with dirac delta
Is that the dirac delta?
but my question is how do i verify that y(0) = 1 ?
do you have a definition of derivatives of the delta function
we haven't covered distributions very formally so not really :(
i just know this as a table laplace transform
show the table
or like it makes sense when you integrate it
also this is mentioned but i don't think we need it here?..
like it makes sense to include 0-
it's just this is my question
in what way is y(0) = 1
because y(0+) is 64 and y(0) requires evaluation of delta function
idk i hate that they never defined what a distribution even is but make us solve problems involving it
(\mathcal{L}{y^{\prime }(t)}(s)=sY(s)-y(0^{-})) is the answer
Gold_Baconzx
maybe show your steps how you got here
yeah there might be a problem there, give me a sec
i did verify tho that my inverse laplace transform is correct and matches with WA
but it might be wrong initially
The initial condition is typically given as (y(0)=1), which is often interpreted as (y(0^{+})=1). The presence of a Dirac delta function at (t=0) can cause a jump discontinuity in the solution, meaning (y(0^{-})) and (y(0^{+})) are not equal. The value of (y(0)) is usually defined by the problem statement, but in the context of the Laplace transform, the initial condition is specified as (y(0^{-})). To verify the initial condition, you would need to evaluate your solution (y(t)) at (t=0) and confirm it matches the required value. The user's statement that (y(0+)=64) is a specific detail from their problem. The verification process would involve checking if the solution (y(t)) satisfies this condition.
Gold_Baconzx
is this chatgpt generated?
i used google lense
"The user's statement" bro 🥀
what browser u use
firefox, why?
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
i sent them above 
where did s^4 in denominator go
always send work 
jesus christ everything becomes so much simpler
i think in general you get weirdness when your numerator has a greater degree than denominator
i'll keep that in mind for the exam
so if you get that sort of rational function it's probably a good idea to check whether it's correct (as in this case), because i don't think you should get that when ode solving
Closed by @young raft
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-43 message
hold up
oo new update
Closed by @young raft
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@sudden carbon Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@sudden carbon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Am I thinking about this statement correctly
That if a value is in the compact set, then it has a value. However, lets say a value is at infinity and its outsdie of the compact set, then its essentially zero
😆
Well i could use the extreme value theorm here could I not to prove this?
@shell cairn Has your question been resolved?
is topology induced by metric
.close
Closed by @shell cairn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
any way to shorten the second expression?
xor might be useful here but i'm not sure how to incorporate it into the proposition
mm that's unfortunate
i heard there's something called iverson brackets, but it's pretty obscure for me
iverson bracket doesnt rly have anything to do w this
it's basically just a fancier version of an indicator function
in that it turns true and false into the real numbers 1 and 0 resp
Closed by @proven wren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
wait
✅ Original question: #help-43 message
NOT (q XOR q XOR r) AND (p OR q OR r)
that first q should be p
basically this is "Is there an even amount of trues AND is at least one true"
which is logically equivalent to "exactly two of three statements are true"
fungy you still here?
oh sorry something cropped up
needa take care of it, i'll come back in 10min
looking at the karnaugh map (if you're familiar) you have the most efficient map in terms of OR'ing a bunch of ANDterms. if you take the opposite approach (AND'ing a bunch of OR terms together), then you would get 4 terms but on the plus side 3/4 of them would have only 2 propositions each
-# edit: swapped OR's and AND's
isnt what fungys doing ORing sets of ANDs
oh i got it completely backwards
@proven wren Has your question been resolved?
So what it is really used for I have seen this first time
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
f(x)=sinx and g(x)=cosx in R
The multiplication will be Uniform continuous?
there are several ways to see that yes, like if you calc'ed f' it's kinda obvious that f is 1-lipschitz
you can also notice that sin(x)*cos(x) is sin(2x)/2 because of the sin(2x) identity
Which is bounded
Thanks
Any specific thing related to sin and cos where they are not uniform continuous
you can always make stuff that's not even continuous like sin/cos or whatever
the point is more that if you calc'ed f' you should have looked for 1-lipschitz
@molten grotto Has your question been resolved?
Thanks
Closed by @molten grotto
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I only care about x>L/2 in the question but how would I compute the derivatives including the point x=L/2
@scenic sluice Has your question been resolved?
@scenic sluice Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@scenic sluice Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @scenic sluice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Proof for linear thermal expansion equation (for solids)
.close
Closed by @cunning jetty
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, i dont really understand the solution to this problem
I calculated the vector product correctly, but I don't understand the subsequent step where they've set the magnitude equal to 0
what must the cross product be for two vectors to be parallel?
OHHH RIGHT
wait a sec
isnt that already being handled by sin(180) though
|v||w|sin(theta)
the sin theta will already make it 0 right
Firstly I see no sin in that equation
isnt the equation for the cross product also |v||w|sin(theta)?
You're confusing cross product and dot product
Sorry, cross
mistype
OHHH WAIT I GET IT
|vxw| = |v||w|sin(theta)
the RHS will be 0, so I can solve it, cause I already have the LHS
dot product, which measures "how parallel" two vectors are uses cosine. cross product, which itself is a vector (not a scalar like the dot product), measures "how perpendicular" two vectors are. because the cross product is a vector & not a scalar, it is not suggested you use the sin definition, since you then need to get the magnitude of it.
yeah, you shouldn't even involve the sin definition to begin with
oh, thats a nice analogy
The trick is to set RHS = 0, since cross product = 0 means they have "no perpendicularness", or they're parallel (which is the semantic opposite of perpendicular)
ive been struggling to wrap my head around the dot and cross product, aside from their formulas
that definition isn't used much yea?
ive sorta noticed that most problems ignore it
Not really, the cosine definition for dot product is perfectly legit, but the sine definition for cross product is not really useful. you can get the same thing out of doign the "ladder rule" or whatever you call it (thing you did in your photo) without information loss
yea, i was referring to the sin definition for the cross product
I would even go as far as to say you should completely forget the sin definition once you're no longer a complete beginner
tbh i find that way kinda irritating, way easier to just diagonlise a matrix
the way the image does it kinda involves memorising the formula which is clanky
the only normally viable usecase would be for finding the angle between 2 vectors right? (assuming that the question doesnt let you solve it using dot product, which is easier)
you mean get the determinant of?
yup
i keep on muddling up terms in my head
Yeah I guess... I really doubt you'll ever get asked to find the angle between two vectors and not be allowed to use a dot product though. The dot product is a really important tool that actually defines the angle between two vectors (which you'll learn more generally as an "inner product" if you take another linalg course after this), so being asked to find the angle between two vectors without the dot product would be like asking for you to multiply two numbers without using the multiplication operator. Prof might do something wonky though so who knows.
haha nothing like thats gonna happen here, this is a high school math class
I'll be fine then. we've mostly used the cross product to find stuff like shortest distance between 2 vectors and such
@rugged parrot Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rugged parrot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does part b look right
i am really confuse i just dont see ever like math in this groups are you a secondary school student , if yes i can if no i cant
I don’t think it comes up often
I don’t have the ms but
it says use answer from part a
would i not use
1-4theta-8theta^2
Welp i dont see anything wrong
Im in year13 so idk
oki thanks
gauth maths says to plug in 0.14
that’s why im confused
Sure but why put in 2 theta
Yeah but you just plug theta into the equation you proved in a
fuckass teacher hasn’t uploaded ms
whats mean that circle symbol
theta?
yes
Just a symbol thats a placeholder for an angle
Kinda like x or y
you want the question a or b answer
b
just replaced theta with 0.07 and you have solved the a question < and fill the second equation with the previous A B C which you have calculated
i am sorry my english is a little bit bad do you understand it or i need to write it on a paper ?
Nah nah thats good
.close
Closed by @onyx pulsar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello. Is there a proof as to why induction works? If so, what kind of proof is it? Please don't include the proof itself in your answer as i dont feel that my brain is active enough currently to handle it. I just wanna know if its provable without circular reasoning or similar problems
I have a dumb intuitive way if you want to hear it
sure
if you start at 1
and you want to go to 5
you repeat the argument 4 times
each time it goes to 2, then 3, then 4, then finally to 5
sure there is a proof
But I think you need to go back to foundations
repeating the same operator over and over again has some importance to it
yea it follows from the well ordering principle
I think this is pretty much how i think of it too. It makes a lot of sense. But because we always prove everything in maths i was searching if there was a way to justify the sufficiency of assuming n is true and blah blah leading us to the conclusion
anyways, I'll look up info regarding it. i just wanted to know if it exists
i think it can be confusing for many people who first learn induction to understand why we "assume P(n) is true for some n"
like you think how is that justified?
ye thats my problem with it
the whole point of the implication is that the statement is true for the successor whenever its true for an integer and if we show its true for some base integer (usually 1) then it being true for 1 implies its true for 2 which implies its true for 3...
ohhh I remember this successor predecessor stuff
if a domino falls then the one after it falls, the first domino fell, therefore all of them in front of the first one fell
yeah thats how i think abt it, just way informal-like
In any cases, I think it's better to fully understand the technique first before being interested by the proof
yeah induction is basically: You want to prove P(n) for all natural n.
Assume by contradiction there is a counterexample,
take the minimal counterexample,
that counterexample satisfies P(n) because of the induction step and the base case
I've learned the basics, i like to think. Is there more to learn about it before proceeding to the proofs?
when we assume its true for some n try not to think of it like we are finding some far out integer for which the statement holds like its just a placeholder to be able to extend the idea of the next domino falling to all integers
🤔
what
oh
you mean in the proof
using well ordering
considering the set of integers for which P(n) is false
👍
now prove well ordering principle
yeah ive been acclimitizing to this idea since i got in uni cuz we use arbitrary values a lot
fun fact Induction is equivalent to well ordering
and usually, induction is proven first
so really depends on what you wanna take as your axiom
so it is circular reasoning?
induction is very closely tied to the definition of natural numbers
how can you prove something about natural numbers if you dont know anything about them in prior?
no
You either gotta give a precise enough definition of naturals, or accept some axioms about them
the well ordering principle is just like the most basic assumption you have about the naturals
fair enough
if you don't take anything as an axiom then there is no math to do, some things have to be assumed without proof
You can either take well ordering to be your axiom or strong induction or weak induction
oh I see. yeah havent read abt it yet
the point though is that whether you assume induction or well ordering you can prove the other from that assumption
okay that sounds good enough for me
that is the sense in which they are equivalent, the truth of one implies the truth of the other
*each other
yea
yes
mhm
saying each other reads to me as p -> q and p -> p
p -> p doesn't need mention
now youre frying me man
induction implies well ordering
well ordering implies induction
is that i was trying to say
Closed by @kind hollow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This channel is only for on-topic discussion. Please take casual conversation to #discussion or #chill.
[infinity]
Have you looked at your notes if you have it?
Well, do it then 😅
Are you doing the exercises without knowing the theory? 
sure is
you can't roll a 1 and a 2 at once on the same roll of a die
congratulations point missed successfully
idk if this was sophistry or a legit counterargument.

Y=1 and Y=2 are always mutually exclusive no matter what kind of RV Y is
but yes that is the idea
tf you been doing in your prob course lol
@copper loom
Check at least if you have some similar concept/theorem given to you
I don't believe your teacher gave you this assignment without explaining anything about how to solve it or giving you the math instruments
Sorry, I was referring to your question which is a theorem
My bad
chapter 1, like, all of it?
no you're way overthinking it
and trying to say things that sound like they make sense but actually don't
ok. look.
lets forget about any random variables for a moment.
imagine youve got a bag full of counters, each of which is painted say one of three colors (red, green, blue) and has a number written on it.
im gonna leave it deliberately unspecified what type of counter appears how many times in the bag
the probability of drawing a counter labelled 5 may be viewed as:
P(any 5) = P(red 5) + P(green 5) + P(blue 5)
"formulaism"
how does it define a random variable
ok good
X=x as an event is short for {ω ∈ Ω : X(ω) = x}
i.e. when we speak of the event X=x we mean the set of precisely all those outcomes on which the random variable X returns the value x
same story with events like X>x or X<x or X ≥ x or X ≤ x...
proof of what
the event {X=x} is the disjoint union of the events {X=x, Y=y} where y ranges over all possible values of Y
@copper loom Has your question been resolved?
ExpertEsquieESQUIE
@copper loom Has your question been resolved?
@copper loom Has your question been resolved?
instead of saying define $B$ as the union of $B_n$’s u can say define $B=\bigcup_nB_n$
ロケット・ジャンプ
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont get why the common monomial factor is 3 instead of 6?
when ur getting the cube of binomial
cuz isnt it 3x^2y + 3xy^2
what is it here
yea 6 seems right to me
🤔
but… idk…
this is a solution manual
wait ill show u what i got, i used a diff method but i got a diff answer
solutions manuals can be wrong
💀
demand refund.
its 4 am and my competition is at 9
no seems fine to me
he’s not a robot
So -301 is the answer?
i mean compare with this, if you instead had the factor be 6 youd add an additional 21 to the right
and get -301
so it checks out
bro i need a refund
word
how is discord more helpful
just put your money in the blender next time
knief is taking donations
🤣🤣
yea
get to that
knief also hands out life advice in addition to math help. Donate extra to him
are you watching old zoom recordings
i feel like hamilton
yes….
been there
Wait im finding the other one
I think they used the same thing there
ok nvm i give up
@astral aurora Has your question been resolved?
Decentralized betting: no deposits needed, no personal data shared, no payouts declined. Your money, your bets. Always.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have problem with learning math
What’s troubling you?
When i study
And I gain information that I am surprised that I will lose it after a week a month…
Well are you cramming or studying naturally?
You should be able to retain knowledge a lot longer than a week, so are you sure you’re studying healthily?
Tbh cramming
That’s your answer. You should want to study, and want to get good scores, assuming you’re doing tests or something.
Idc about tests
it's probably because you are learning something you dont understand enough to keep it in a long time
Could also be this.
and its ok because thats how the education system works
It makes me feel like what I'm doing is useless
You shouldn’t cram. You should be “in the zone”. You should learn because you want to learn.
Wdym?
learning methode to resolve something or find something when you dont understand the concept behind, it could be hard to remember this
i mean
I really take to understand one theorem or definition at least 1 hour
in geometry, you learn a lot of methode to find a lot of things
but there's no explication behind 99% this methodes
and you just apply
and you forget
because you forget why you are doing this
Mean i need to apply my informations?
it depends of how you work
i mean
i was as same of you
when i began to do real maths
but when i try to find relations behind methodes
it is very simple to me
because i link things
between them
hhhh english
did you understand ?
But i do what you said
I really study mathematics with high accuracy.
I don't miss a part unless I understand it
But I'll find out later that I forgot 40% of what i study
It makes me doubt that I am sick with alzheimer or something like that
you forgot or you dont remember ?
Isnt the same?
exactly
But
When i try to remeber without question
Make no sense
Try to remember without goal
ye
ofc
u cant be that accurate
without working actively
its ok if you cant remember a demo in your head
unless you can write it with a pen and a paper
Who’s that
an app
for studies
yep it could be helpful
but it requiered a bit of time and rigourous
Maybe
yep i agree
Then i conclude from that discussion
That to test myself if i still remember math informations i need to apply
np dude
its ok to question yourself
i wont say that
but if you want mate
@terse linden Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @terse linden
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@rotund sphinx
can u help me w a couiple more plz
@vocal idol Has your question been resolved?
Please do not ping individual helpers unprompted.
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
@vocal idol Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vocal idol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hiii, can I have some helps
My thought is to find area where a point in that area has the distance from P to AB less than distance from P to 2 other sides
But I'm not sure how I can find that
you can draw an angle bisector like this
if P lies on the angle bisector then PE = PG
first consider when abp has a greater area than acp. then consider the same with abp and bcp.
what is that for
if P lies in this red area below the bisector then PG > PE
btw I found a solution, I'm a bit curious about your method
and take the the intersection
yes
what about PF
do the same with PG vs PF
you mean intersection?
oh yeah that's what I meant mb
yeah exactly
okay I see,that's also a nice way
yeah you get that P has to lie in this area
Mine doesn't deal with intersection
yes I also got that
Thanks
.close
Closed by @calm light
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
67
.solved
Closed by @chilly basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do u find the Sn of
1 + 2 + 4 + 7 + 11 + 16 + ...
note that common difference increases by 1 every time
First you find the difference of the differences.
And then there is a formula for the "stacked" arithmetical progression.
if you were to subtract the increase in the common difference you can say it’s an arithmetic progression, so you could subtract 1+2+3….+n
is it possible to use only AP and GP formulas to solve this
which is just n(n+1)/2
The second differences are constant
So it’s a quadratic sequence
Let a_n = an^2 + bn + c
We know a1 = a+b+c=1
a2 = 4a + 2b + c= 2
a3 = 9a + 3b + c = 4
Subtract the first from the second
second from the third
Subtract those
Then:
3(1/2) + b = 1 => 3/2 + b = 1 => b = -1/2
Now plug into a + b + c = 1
So the nth term is
a_n = (1/2n)^2 - (1/2)n + 1
Or a_n = (n^2-n+2)/2
||the sum is 1/6n(n^2+5) I think , you could try induction proof for this||
@icy nymph Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @icy nymph
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with geometry. we have to make a pyramid, know information is K coordinates are (50,40,40), diagonal AC (horizontal) is 60 mm at 45 degree angle, diagonal DB (frontal) is 60 mm at 30 degree angle. height of the pyramid KV is 65mm. i have to construct the pyramid, ive done the both bases in frontal and horizontal projection but i dont know where to draw KV and how long to draw it because it not the real length
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
this channel is being used by someone else. Claim another
mb didnt understand. Follow #❓how-to-get-help
@dim plinth Has your question been resolved?
still need help
<@&286206848099549185>
You there?
🥲 all good
Can we make some assumptions?
I think assuming that the base is at the horizontal plane and AC is 45 degree on horizontal plane
could this be a way to find the real lenght of KV?
K is the topmost point of the pyramid
yeah
its the diagonal inetesection
yeahh its very confusing
Chill, lets try to figure it out
I think we gotta create an auxiliary view
can u check this tho, becuase technically im getting the real lenght using this method or i might just be schizo who knows
It looks correct but my gut says you’re missing something
probably yeah 😔
I just woke up so my system is not fully working
its okayy, ill just keep working on it and if something is not gonna add up ill find the mistake that way
.close
Closed by @dim plinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Wait i got it
yeahh tell me
A and D at the front left and right corners
60 mm length
B at the back right corner and C at back left
45 and 30 degree
so should i draw the whole thing again that way?
Yeah, K is the apex
And exactly below that is V if you see from top view
I hope you get what i mean
Lmk when you’re done
It’ll be good if you send your work
okayy hopefully wont forget to, ill take a break for now tho
Yeah no worries, have a nice day mate
ty so much
Closed by @gaunt lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey
I need help to understand probability
any questions you particularly need help with?
B i and ii
well... I don't recommend using ChatGPT without understanding the material in the first place, but at least you've come to ask about it, so props to you
anyway
die A is labelled 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 6
and die B is labelled 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 4
Yep
you want a total of exactly 6 from both dice
let's get the low-hanging fruit out of the way first
which two numbers on die A make it impossible to get a total of exactly 6?
1 2 2 3 6
2 3 3 4 4
what are the numbers on die A?
1 2 2 2 3 6
cool
Wrong?
no, cool as in yeah, correct
now, for each number on die A, can you tell me what number the other die must show for the two dice to get a total of exactly 6?
for example, 1 + ? = 6
do this for each of the numbers on die A.
Means no one
1 + ? = 6
4
3 + ? = 6
3
and 6 + ? = 6
0
Nah
that means we cannot roll a 1 on die A, otherwise we will never get a 6
likewise, is there a 0 on die B?
Alr
No
so for the same reason, we also cannot roll a 6 on die A
so these two numbers are the impossible numbers for die A that I asked for earlier
Yeah okkk
so if they come up, there is no chance of getting a 6
it means No chance
now, 2 needs a 4 to get 6
Yea
how many 2s are there on die A?
3
good, so the probability of rolling a 2 on die A is...?
3/6
good! now, to get a 6 total, we also need die B to show a 4.
how many 4s are there on die B?
so, to get a 6, one option is to roll a 2 on die A (3/6 chance) AND a 4 on die B (also 3/6 chance)
what is the overall probability of this happening?
3/6 x 3/6
that gives us?
9/36
good! keep that in mind for later
Alr
now, the other way to get a 6 total is to get both dice to show 3
Yeah
what's the probability that die A shows a 3?
1/6 x 2/6
(do the same for die B, separately)
oh ok sure
and the overall probability of this case is?
Ok
now, either 2 and 4 OR 3 and 3 will get us 6, so the total probability of getting a 6 total is?
unfortunately, you only multiply when there's an AND
Oh we need to add
well if you want to get into the technical details, OR itself is not adding in terms of bitwise operations
and that would be correct
and that's how you get to the answer of 11/36
so the answer of (i) gives us 11/36
Yes
now, that means that 11 cases out of 36 possible cases end up with a total of 6
now, we are given the total of 6
Yeah
this means we no longer need to care about any case that isn't 6 total
Ok
this shrinks the numbebr of cases we need to consider from 36 to 11
now, what was the probability of getting 3 and 3 that you calculated earlier?
9/36?
sure that's 3 and 3? or was that 2 and 4?
so the probability is...?
chill.
just because I stop replying for like one minute doesn't mean I'm gone lmao
patience, my friend
ok so yeah, that's the correct answer
now, 2 cases out of 36 sees the two dice show 3 each
Tomoroow is my paper that’s why i am worried
And my teacher is even not attending my call noe replying to my texts
but that original comparison we made was 11 cases out of 36 showing a total of 6
I know other topics like functions graphs etc
Hm
so, are you gonna interrupt me or shall we continue?
anyway
so if we knew that 11 cases out of 36 has the dice totalling 6, of which 2 of them have the dice showing 3 and 3, can you now tell me the probability of the dice showing 3 and 3 if we knew the total is 6? (which is what the question is asking)
1/6
your answer should have a denominator of 11
(since that is the number of cases in consideration here)
Can’t understand
do you get this part?
then do you know what we did in (b)(i)?
use the context and answer of (b)(i) on this message
(which, for reminder, is 11/36)
Can u plz summarise it in easy wording
Like the one u did before
Its only 2 mark question
the idea is that there's an 11/36 chance of getting a 6 total
Okk
in other words, 11 of 36 possible cases have a 6 total
Alr
now, (ii) tells us that we know the total is 6
so we don't care about any case that is not 6 total
well yes, but we don't care about those cases and thus there's no need to calculate that
so since we only care about total 6, from here, we know there are 11 interesting cases
How did 11 come?
so any probability we do is /11, not /36, because we are only interested in those 11 cases
good
Taking 11 as a total probability means total
now, tell me the two probabilities of getting a 2 and 4 / 3 and 3 case from part (i).
Like our answer will come as numinator and denominator will be 11
right idea.
2 in both dices?
no, 2 in both dice will give us total 4, which is not what we want
we found out earlier that to get total 6 with these two dice, we want die A to show 2 and die B to show 4, or both dice show 3
We want total of 3?
no. where did you get that from?
Question
question said total 6
yes, and we are getting there
so what are the probabilities of these two cases separately?
put this into /36
I can’t understand i think i will not understand this
and this too
this is not necessary
just multiply these two numbers
9/36
I don't think what I asked is particularly hard or anything 😅
there we go. what about that other one?
this one
Ik but idk math will make me mad
2/36
then you need to learn to chill a bit perhaps
cool. now remember that these 2 cases were the (3 and 3) case
Ok teacher
so, 2 cases show 3 and 3 out of the 11 cases that make 6 total
so the probability of 3 and 3 given total 6 is...?
you can get the answer from this message
I'm asking what question (ii) is asking
question (ii) basically tells you that you know the dice total is 6 already
Yes
so now that you know the two dice add to 6, what is the chance of the (3 and 3) case happening (and not the (2 and 4) case)?
1/6 x 2/6?
well, on the right track, except now you only have 11 cases to think about
3 3 in both dices?
2 in the numerator is correct
Oh okkkieeee
yes, as the question wants
2/11 x 1/11
Both numbers are 3
mhm
Dice a has 1 three while dice b have 2 three
that's already accounted for in 2/36
we already know that based on die A having one 3 and die B having two 3s will give us 2 cases out of 36 to get 3 and 3
but now we only care about a small part of those 36 cases
Okkk
that is, we only care about total 6
that's why the denominator becomes smaller, because we have less cases to think about
2/11 is correct
yes
Is this correct?
Thank you so much dear teacher for helping me
@echo nymph Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
idk where to start lol
in a triangle, the bigger the angle, the longer the opposing side
for example here, angle A > B so BC > AC
another factor you have to consider is the length of each side > 0
oh you also have the triangle inequality as well
ye
so i got it?
(3.5, infinity)
wait
<@&286206848099549185> help
Do you know the sine rule?
i think it's x + 7 > x+ 4 > 3x-3
no
ok
Okay, it's basically a way of motivating the "bigger the side, the bigger the angle"
ye but we need to find X
oh yea
x + 7 > x+ 4 > 3x-3 so we need to solve that
It says that a/sin A = b/sin B = c/sin C where A is the angle at A, and a is the side opposite A and so on.
yeah i think so
yeah im not sure tbh, ive never done a problem like this
ye
um... 3x - 3 < x + 4 ⇒ 2x < 7 ⇒ x < 7/2. but you also need all the side lengths to be positive: 3x - 3 > 0 ⇒ x > 1
And the sides to satisfy a + b > c for any triple of side lengths a,b,c
The triangle inequality thing gives 3 extra inequalities:
2x + 11 > 3x - 3
4x + 1 > x + 7
4x + 4 > x + 4
oh
wait so now what
its 3x btw
wait nvm
(2,3.5)
The altitudes in an acute triangle have lengths $2,$ $3,$ and $h.$ Find all possible values of $h^2.$
✪~nano-rōnin~✪
but I can time them out 

