#help-42
1 messages · Page 180 of 1
Don't rlly have time to read what you wrote, also it looks kinda long
$$z\bar{z}w-w\bar{w}z=z-w \implies \left(|z|^2+1\right)w=\left(|w|^2+1\right)z$$
If $z=0$, then $w=0$ and $z=w$. If $z \neq 0$, then $w=tz$ for some $t \in \mathbb{R}^{+}$. Then,
$$|z|^2 (tz)-|tz|^2 z=z-tz \implies (1-t)(t|z|^2-1)z=0$$
Since $z \neq 0$, either $t=1 \implies w=z$ or
$$t=\frac{1}{|z|^2} \implies w=\frac{z}{|z|^2}=\frac{1}{\bar{z}} \implies \bar{z}w=1 \implies z\bar{w}=1.$$
Civil Service Pigeon
it's just this
Closed by @sullen bridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-42 message
hol'on what is that $\bar z w=1$
Hydra_Nuker
Closed by @sullen bridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rccw
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
4
looks right
why is -1/2 included tho
you just said above that x =! -1/2
since 2x +1 is in the denominator
Oh my god
I knew something was wrong
I couldn't find it
A minus sign would be the cause of my death one day
I wrote x ≠ 1/2 instead of -1/2
LMAO

happy to help 
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.solved
Closed by @rancid sphinx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
\textbf{(c) Prove that $|\mathbb{R}| = |\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{Q})|$ [Hint: Find 1-1 Maps $f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{Q})$ and $g: \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{Q}) \to \mathbb{R}$]}
\\
Let $f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{Q})$. Let $f(x) = {q \in \mathbb{Q} : q < x}$. Note that $f(x)$ is a Dedekind cut, so we correctly map $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{{Q}}) \to \mathbb{R}$. Now, we want to show $f$ is 1-1. Suppose $f(x) = f(y)$. Then ${q \in \mathbb{Q} : q < x} = {q \in \mathbb{Q} : q < y}$. If $x < y$, there would be a rational number between $x$ and $y$ hence the sets would not be equal. If $y> x$, the same argument holds, thus by trichotomy, $x = y$, hence $f$ is 1-1.
\\
Let $g: \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{Q}) \to \mathbb{R}$
toast
Hi, i am stuck coming up with a 1-1 function for g
Let $f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{Q})$. Let $f(x) = {q \in \mathbb{Q} : q < x}$. Note that $x$ is a Dedekind cut of $\mathbb{Q}$, so we correctly map $\mathbb{R} \to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{{Q}}) $. Now, we want to show $f$ is 1-1. Suppose $f(x) = f(y)$. Then ${q \in \mathbb{Q} : q < x} = {q \in \mathbb{Q} : q < y}$. If $x < y$, there would be a rational number between $x$ and $y$ hence the sets would not be equal. If $y> x$, the same argument holds, thus by trichotomy, $x = y$, hence $f$ is 1-1.
minor fixes to part f
toast
@pale prairie Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Do you know already that |Q|=|N|?
@pale prairie Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The product of some prime numbers, not necessarily distinct, is equal to $10$ times their sum. What are these primes?
Weierstrass Obsidian
i dont know where to start
the product is divisible by 10
I don't wanna
because it's equal to 10x their sum so it's 10x something and something
mmm
10 is a factor
you can bound it probably
there's probably a lot of ways that this is possible
||2,3,5||
Before you start doing big brain ideas maybe just ooga it and consider cases of how many primes beyond 5 and 2 there could be
guys i need help
There needs to be more clearly
just to be clear, you're not told the number of primes involved in this?
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
||don't it need to be 100 for that or smth||
,, q_1 \2 q_2 \2 q_k = 7 + q_1+ \dots q_k
because it's 10 times a number so we know 2 and 5 are prime factors
now suppose the remaining prime is p
10(p+2+5)=10p which is NOT true so there are at least 2 other prime numbers
now we can also simplify this to just (7+some primes)=some primes multiplied together
You need to have at least two extra primes
So it gotta be at least four
Maybe try solving xy = 7 + x + y and see if there are any suitable solutions
It won't be much more than 4 cuz the left hand side is growing far faster than right
I am not doing the laplace transform in the channel above this
That stuff is like ten times easier than this 
it looks intimidating
so i need to do laplace transform?
No 
why
Just ignore what was said about laplace
you actually do the weierstrauss substitution
Do this
I'm joking
Why would you seriously consider it in this context at all
also ideally you would also want to keep x and y small for hopefully obvious reasons.
because it's a mechanical thing
Consider 5 primes case
but there isnt a finite limit
you'll still ideally want not too many primes because there's a product on one side and a sum on the other.
funny
2^p ≤ 7 + 2p will hold only up to some finite p
Yes
?
Substituting anything higher than 2 will only cause the LHS to grow larger
I found out the answer
You'll find that this fails for p = 4
So you really only need to check for 2 cases: 4 primes and 5 primes
Are you listening to my explanation at all
because of what the ant lemonade fan said
I don't understand what's written there
simply put, consider a product and a sum. which grows faster: the product or the sum?
they're substituting all the primes as some p amount of 2 since that's easier to interpret and gives us a rough guess as to how many primes we have to place
product
if the product grows faster then as you add more elements the product will blow up beyond what the sum can reach.
(with the same elements.)
so the more primes you have in your list the higher your odds of having your product be higher than 10 times your sum simply because the growth rate of a product is faster than that of a sum.
and all primes afterwards would be larger than 2 o this is the absolute max number of primes
Notice:
For prime numbers 3
We have: 3k + 1 3k + 2
is 1 a prime
NO
is 4 a prime
yes
what??
huh???
because one wasn't
uh?
This might be a troll
1 can only be divided by one and 0
even primes?
1 is by convention not a prime because then every other number would not be a prime, and also 1 cannot be divide by 0
ok ,thanks
So 3k + 1 for odd so k must even 3k + 2 k must be odd
k
2 3 5, 5 5, 3 7 ?
I wonder what u were trying to say hmm
going back to this, you can further this by making it
xy-x-y+1=8
(x-1)(y-1)=8 x and y have to be prime numbers
isnt just 9?
@languid cypress Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Is this the question?
The product of some prime numbers, not necessarily distinct, is equal to $10$ times their sum. What are these primes?
Matt V
I have not tried this before, but I would use the "Series" formula/method.
what formula
Such as: P1 x P2 x ... x Pn = 10 x ( P1 + P2 + ... + Pn )
Left side - product
Right side - sum
And since 2 x 5 = 10 and 2 and 5 closest to 0 are prime. I would think it is the first number.
I think that's as far as I can get it.
- So at least we know that the prime numbers can be 2 and 5.
yes
why
why are there 2 fives?
why not 3
3 is also a prime number
2,3,5 dont prove the equation
?
2,3,5,5 proves that
???
the question didnt restrict to use a prime number once
why not 2,3,3,5
let me check it for that
how do you check?
2*3*3*5=90
2+3+3+5=13
13*10=130
so not possible
@chrome reef help him I need to go
well you can just check it
like by finding the product and 10*sum
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
It seems a bit suspicious to me: the solution came out immediately, but when they asked you how you controlled it, you disappeared.
Probably AI usage.
@nimble flume
aren’t you asking for a possible primes where the product = 10(sum)
2*3*5*5=150
2+3+5+5=15
10(15)=150
Ok, but without redoing the whole solution: why after removing 2 and 5 do we end up looking for primes with product = sum + 7?
i think it’s cuz u already know 2 and 5 must be in the equation
Yeah but that only explains why 2 and 5 are included. I’m asking why removing them changes the equation into “remaining product = remaining sum + 7”. Can you write that algebra step? pls
sure
can you write in latex pls
yeah
server?
discord server
can i join?
no
why
private
why
shouldn’t you write it…?
you intend to just copy solutions?
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn; please don't ask for direct answers. Ask for guidance, explanations, or feedback instead.
i need the code
just copy and paste here
@chrome reef
you have no honor
this is nothing more than a blatant shameless attempt at plagiarism
in reality because the photo (even deleted) was quite obviously chatgpt
the source of the material you claim as your own is not important
the shameful feature is that you'd like to claim something you did not write as your own
why are you telling me these things
because you ought to hear it
I don't really care what you're writing, honestly.
lol
you’re telling me that latex is chatgpt?
yes
interesting
<@&268886789983436800> sorry to ping, I just want clarification. A solution image was posted and then deleted after I asked for the code/source. He also said it was hosted on his own server, but no source was provided. I’m not accusing anyone; I just thought it looked suspicious and wanted to know if it can be checked.
Asking for peoples code to copy because you want to copy a solution is against the rules btw
What's the difference between copying from a photo or having the code?
both are against the rules
You're essentially asking for a solution, either way.
I am not understood
Coming onto this server to get solutions you can copy is against the rules
When asking a question, show what you tried to solve the problem. We are not here to do your homework for you, but we are here to help you learn how to do your homework.
We're here to help you learn not help you cheat
also I don't think it was the solution
👀 dra,ma
People may help assist you with a solution; but that's not the same as you directly requesting one
Now you did mention it as requesting LaTeX code, but that's not functionally distinct
Admittedly, sniper didn't really help steer that discussion in a productive direction
I wasn’t asking to copy anything. I asked because the deleted image and the “own server” explanation sounded like excuses to me, and I don’t like being misled. But I understand the rules, so I won’t ask for source/code anymore.
It's more this message I think some ppl are grappling with, were I to hazard a guess
hi
That message was meant as a check to see if he understood what he posted, not as me asking for the solution. I already knew the step; I was trying to verify whether the deleted image/source was AI/copypasted.
-# lets js stick to the Qsn
I am not understood
mb
yes i do understand
i can help explain it to you
but i can’t just outright give you the answer
but before it was possible
?
up to this point the solution could be written
then it should be written by you
you send the photo first and then write this, it doesn't make sense
yeah i forgot i cant give you the answer so thats my bad on my part
well I would comment, but...
no context
imo you were fine in writing what you did, it didn't directly answer the original question after all
that’s true
i think OP should write the latex code though
Fair enough. I’ll stop asking for source/code. I just find it funny how the deleted image suddenly became “not the answer” only after people started questioning it.
it’s not the answer but it’s steps towards the answer
I just want to understand whether you actually followed the reasoning
no, seeing the raw tex does not give any indication for the legitimacy of the argument
you're supposed to just read the argument and think for yourself
i understand. I’m not asking for the LaTeX anymore. I just wanted to know whether he understood what he posted, since the image was deleted and the later explanation was unclear.
i understand what i posted
up to an abuse of notation (the number of primes ought to change when you remove two of them), the conclusion that the resulting product was 7 more than the resulting sum seemed fair
and indeed something you could recreate
@languid cypress Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What should be the thinking process in solving this
,rccw
Yes
Okay and are you also familiar with the fact that tan(x) * cot(x) = 1
Now that I think about it, I get why tan(x) times cot(x) is 1
so you understand this statement right?
Yes
nice
Well can you see that the first term and the last term,
they can be manipulated using the statements i mentioned above
.
lmk if it doesnt strike you yet
No?
Trying
Oh sorry sure try!
Oh I see
tan(pi/2 - pi/20)
is tan(9π/20) and the last term is cot (9π/20) so they become 1
TYSM
It would be cot(9 x 5) or cot(45) which is 1
holy tuff 🤑
tryna be positive to random ppl can't even do that 😭
Any one of these
.pin
.close
Closed by @soft nova
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the xy plane can be defined as E: x + y = 0 ?
?
x + y = 0 is a line
y = -x
x + y + 0z = 0
the equation of the xy-plane is z=0
wait why
actually yes
wtf
yes exactly
because z = 0
So it's not the xy plane.
how do i notate the xy plane
z=0
z = 0
x+y + 0z=0 is a plane, it's just not the xy-plane/
yeah
ty
also it could aslo be z = 5 or something right
or
no nvm
nah
the d thing confused me
d?
ax+bx+cx = d
ohh
so ur basically saying z is literally 0 so your plane is literally in the xy thing
yeah
so wait can i post another proble in here
yes
u been studying for a while bro
hes locked in
hell nah man i can barely do like 50% of the content
what content are you doing
oh okay
analysis, linear algebra and probability
so for the 1.2
do i just calulate the intersecting point with Xy plane and E
and then use the cosine formula for the angle
1.1 use distance formula for
1.2 think in xy, yz, and xz plane
wait
oh ok
nvm I misunderstood this
yes
for 1.2 you wanna think just the xy plane, so z=0
you're going to get the linear intersection between them which is makes it fairly easy to tell what the angle is
(You may also just take normal vectors to E and the xy-plane and compute the dot product to solve for the angle)
btw,
for the angle thing
there r 2 formulas
one with sine and one with cosine
when do u use which
The sine one is for the magnitude of the cross product.
sine to find area
there's an easier way to think about this
it intersects with the xy plane
so we know z=0
plug it into your plane
so what is the intersection of the plane described with the xy plane
At the end of the day finding the intersection may help in some way, but the normal vectors is usually how you find the angle between planes.
^ yeah
@still terrace Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @still terrace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $S$ be the set of finite sequences of $X$. What is the best approach of showing $|S| \leq |X|$?
toast
blud. you really ask the most absurd questions
are you pursuing something in mathematics?
like a UG?
yeah ug
btw the issue with this is ordering
like $(abc) \neq (acb)$ but for subsets, ${a,b,c} = {a,c,b}$
toast
so perhaps i need to come up with an injection from S to X
i guess
is a sequence just a cartiesian product?
Could you show the set of sequences of length n in X is in bijection with X?
i think a bijection is hard
well, injection
We finally want to show that $|S| \leq |X|$. Observe that for any $s \in S$, $s \in X^n$ for some $n \in \omega$. That is, $S = \displaystyle \bigcup_{n \in \omega} X^n$. So $|S| = \displaystyle|\bigcup_{n \in \omega}X^n |$. Observe that for any $n \in \omega$, $|X^n| =|X|$. Then $\displaystyle|\bigcup_{n\in\omega}X^n| \leq \sum_{n \in \omega}|X^n| = \aleph_0 \cdot |X| = |X|$. Thus $|S| \leq |X|$.
this is what i did
toast
well that's basically it
toast
but can i just say it comes from the definitino of cardinal arithmatic
\textbf{Definition - Cardinal Addition:} \
$\kappa + \lambda = |X \cup Y |$ whenever $|X| = \kappa$, $|Y| = \lambda$, and $X \cap Y = \emptyset$\
toast
since we dont know whether the sets are disjoint
then $|X \cup Y| \leq \kappa + \lambda$?
toast
\subsection{Problem 1.} \textbf{Prove that for any infinite set $X$, the cardinality of $X$, the cardinality of finite subsets of $X$, and the cardinality of the set of finite sequences from $X$ are all equal.}
\\
\textit{Proof:} Let $|X| = \kappa$. Let $C = {Y \subset X : |Y| < \aleph_0}.$ We want to claim that $|X| \leq |C|$. We first want to find an injection $f: X \to C$. Let $x \in X$. Let $f(x) = {x}$. Observe that ${x}\in C$, since ${x} \subseteq X$. Now let $f(x) = f(x')$ for some $f(x'), f(x) \in C$. That is, ${x} = {x'} \iff x = x'$ by Axiom of Extensionality. so $f: X \to C, f(x) ={x}$ is an injection, so $|X| \leq |C|$.
\\
Let $S=$ finite sequences of $X$. We now want to show that $|C| \leq |S|$. We first want to find an injection $g: C \to S$. Let $A \in C$ be any finite subset of $X$ with cardinality of $n$. We can uniquely order $A = {a_1, a_2, a_3, ..., a_n}$ since $A$ is finite, so fix a well-ordering $\leq$ on $A$ where $a_1 \leq a_2 \leq ... \leq a_n$. Then let $g(A) = (a_1a_2....a_n)$. Because $a_1, a_2, ..., a_n \in X$, this is a valid sequence of $X$, hence $g(A) \in S$. It also is injective since our ordering is unique for any subset.
\\
We finally want to show that $|S| \leq |X|$. Observe that for any $s \in S$, $s \in X^n$ for some $n \in \omega$. That is, $S = \displaystyle \bigcup_{n \in \omega} X^n$. So $|S| = \displaystyle|\bigcup_{n \in \omega}X^n |$. Observe that for any $n \in \omega$, $|X^n| =|X|$. Then $\displaystyle|\bigcup_{n\in\omega}X^n| \leq \sum_{n \in \omega}|X^n| = \aleph_0 \cdot |X| = |X|$. Note the $\leq$ comes from the definition of cardinal addition, where we are not guaranteed disjointedness. Thus $|S| \leq |X|$.
\\
Therefore, $|X| \leq |C| \leq |S| \leq |X| \implies |X| = |C| = |S|$. $\blacksquare$
Here is my full proof
toast
.solved
Closed by @pale prairie
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I am studying for my math test but am confused. I don’t want to resort fully to chatbots to help out so I’d like some human help, haha.
Lately I’ve had to miss some of my classes due to personal issues.
Here is the first page if anyone wants to help and we can see how the rest of things go.
Whixh part is confusing you? Is it the definitions of the mean, median and mode?
Generally all of it. But that’s probably where to start, yes
So for the mean, you have to add all the values together and divide by how many there are
in totality, its 100 right?
Yep
Yeah🥰
np
i got 16.6666666667, i forget what to do in circmstances like this
If i read the sheet write doesnt it say to round to whole numbers? Or do they just mean the values the gave are rounded
it does say round answers to the nearest whole number yes
i dont understand this haha, i should clarify this is like the bottom level college math class, never been my strong suit
OK so in this case, as it is smth.5 or higher (smth.6666667), you should round up
if it were lower than smth.5, round down
so 16.666666667 rounded up is ...
ok so its 16.6 which is 16.7?
whole numbers means no decimals. numbers like 1, 2, 3, etc.
if it says give the exact value just write it as a fraction if it says round to cosest whole number or decimal or something like that just do as the other guy says
the question states to round to the nearest whole number
so its just 17?
yes
the whole discord server is in this channel imma stop bothering bye
your contribution was still appreciated, thanks!
np
ok so now the median
Welcome to Mean, Median, Mode, and Range with Mr. J! Need help with mean, median, mode, and range? You're in the right place!
Whether you're just starting out, or need a quick refresher, this is the video for you if you're looking for help with how to find mean, median, mode, and range. Mr. J will go through a mean, median, mode, and range exam...
watch this video to help you remember all the definitions
use this, it genuinely helped me (ik it sounds stupid):
hey diddle diddle, the median's the middle, you add and divide for the mean. The mode is the one that appears the most and the range is the difference between.
Its like to the tune of a nursery rhyme or smth
i see, what does the middle mean in this context?
its like if u arrange them in order of lowest to highest, you pick the middle one
e.g
(from lowest to highesr)
a,b,c,d,e,f,g
d is in the middle
(1,2,3,4,5,6,7)
(4 is in the middle)
but if u have an even number of items:
h,i,j,k,l,m
The middle is j and k
so u take the mean of those
(j+k)/2
something that helps is arrange them lowest to highest, then cross one off from each side until you get to only one or two left
and if there's 2 left then do what was mentioned above and find average
just take the number of items, add one, divide by two.
Hope i helped, slide into dms if u need more help cuz i gtg @marble isle
yoo krish can u hop on my channel quickly pls
and the mode is most, so itd be 18 too
for 2., am i divding 601 by 7 because its in a week?
Here’s what I got
this all looks fine
though you can also check this yourself in #bots
,w 83, 88, 86, 87, 88, 84, 85
example for mean and median
oh i didnt know that, interesting. thank you

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Need help on the lower half of this page
Who is responsible for printing that💔 💔
haha it is a bit awkward isnt it
You first find the renevue for both 2000 and 1998
And substact to find the difference
2000 - 1998 is 2 right?
I mean you lok at the graph to find the revenue for both eyar
ohh
Years
240 - 210?
Uhh i can hardly read that graph 🥀
Isnt it 230-200😭
im not sure!
This is how i assume it was meant to be
Remmebr that its in milliosn
so 30 million?
Yes🥰
im confused on what to do for c as well
same!
Like, just look at the graph bro💔 💔
It’s obvious when it’s decreasing…
Yeah idk about that one bro sry gang
@marble isle Has your question been resolved?
thatd be where to start yeth
Which one do you think is greater, -3 or -7?
-3 is closer to positive, so -3
so the alligator eats -3 😄
They are not equal, are they?
you can do that but then the alligator also flips
2/3 and 3/10, which one is closer to the origin?
wym origin
well when you divide -3/10, its -0.3, so i suppose thats closer
for c, 1/3 is already positive so its that right
.632?
Correct.
haha ill try once the other stuff is over with
Wait.
Np mate!!
0.632 is greater than 0.63
Since 0.632-0.63=0.002
So the answer would be opposite @marble isle .
.pin
Appreciated. I do need help with the stuff above as well
i recommend u to learn a bit independantly so u can be confident with ur answers having someone help on every question wont make u develop problem solving skills
I agree! I often do, but like I said personal issues have gotten in the way from me studying a lot this time and my test is soon.
Night 😄
@marble isle Has your question been resolved?
Good luck!
.close
Closed by @marble isle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(k) $|{f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} : f$ is continuous}|
toast
hmm
how much does the continuity part really matter
evidently it should be less than R^R
but is it also equal to R^R?
i.e is $|\mathbb{R}|^{\mathbb{R}} \leq |F|$
toast
i think continuity matters a lot just by density of Q in R
hmm
i think you'd get knocked down to $\mathfrak c$ instead of $2^{\mathfrak c}$
blanketism
but im a little rusty
well if we didn't care continuity, we can just slap on whatever- but if we cared about continuity and reals are limits of rational sequences, then we must take $2^{\aleph_0}$ into consideration i suppose
blanketism
hmm
@pale prairie Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What has he done?
How has he solved this problem
wasnt there a shortcur for this
smth like add the numerators and the denominators?
Yes
do you want the proof for this maybe.
How can he write 7/x+y = k/x+x = 11/z-y = the sum of 7/x+y and 11/z-y
You can't write 2 = 2 = 2+1
so you do want the proof
it would actually be 2/1 = 2/1 = (2+2)/(1+1)
?
No
so is a/b = c/d = a+c/b+d?
Because they are adding numerator
And denominator
yeah
famous property hai ye
kaafi jagah use hoti hai
mera matlab apke standard mein atleast
not in help channels
but haan its somewhat related to C-D
So did he used (a+b)/(a-b)?
Nahi
ye use kiya
Yeh konsi property hoti hsi
but iska proof uses C-D i think
It is not componendo and dividendo
iska naam nahi malum mujhe but its a property
idts ruko dekhta
Haan this is componendo
nahi am in 11th rn stidying for jee🥀
I see
this property is called componendo
If we combine both C and D, we get this
Bruh componendo and dividend was a+b/a-b = c+d/c-d
Yes thats both of them applied
I am saying only componendo applied is this
Componendo is a+b/b = c+d/d not a+c/b+d
weird i thought it was componendo
either the proof for this property is
let a/b = c/d = k (k is a constant)
a = bk
c = dk
(a+c) = k(b+d)
therefore, k = (a+c)/(b+d)
iska naam mujhe nahi malum then but this is the proprty ig
How could I think of doing such thing
How will it came to my mind
After seeing the problem
And those three equation in fraction
It's a common process whenever you have something=something=something then you equate them to some k to write in one parameter
@radiant rune Has your question been resolved?
-# what the blud
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What to do after wiritng (ab + bc + ca)/abc = 6?
Take the reciprocal
And multiply by 24
Closed by @radiant rune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to realize the drawing of this surface
the lad probably did traces?
can someone help me?
do you mean how do you understand what this surface is
?
the geometrical intuition for this region dawg
if so I can explain that
okay
so let’s take the simplest case and evaluate the 1<x^2+y^2<=2 for z=0
notice the x^2+y^2 ?
this is just a circle
and then since it’s 1<= we only include values with radius greater than 1
so this simple region looks something like a circle with a whole in the middle
now extend upward, evaluate at z=1
1<x^2+y^2<3
our outer circle is bigger and our hole remains the same
that is all the intuition you need
it’ll be circles continuously stacked on top of each other
where the outer radius increases as the magnitude of its height increases
and the center hole remains at a constant radius of 1
does that make sense ?
no
what are you having trouble with?
everything
its <= in both sides dawg
i’m aware
why are you doing strict
?
do you understand what i mean when i evaluted the function at z=0?
that's what we call a trace
no
so yk how x^2+y^2=r^2 generates a circle of radius r?
center origin
now, just place limits on it
@ z=0
the trace is
1<=x^2+y^2<=2
this generates a circle where r is now bounded
if you place limits is a disk.
disk.
it's a disk not a circle
do you understand why this trace @ z=0 looks as such?
why are you so caught up on semantics?
a circle with a cutout hole is an apt and fine description
if you prefer the term disk then that’s suitable for you
why
hole cut..?
but if you are able to come to the conclusion that it means disk then that means my description did a fine job at conveying the info
radius has a lower boundary of 1
this means that any value r<1 is excluded
can u do a drawing
i’m on my phone so it’s low quality
but here
since we have bounded our region such that 1<=r^2<=2 @ z=0
all values of r<1 are excluded
this leaves a circular cutout at the center of r=1
once again, semantics.
yeah
If you are able to come to the conclusion that i’m referring to a disk, then my description was fine
sure and everything in between r < 1
The conveying of information still occurred and there’s no reason to harp on it.
so does this now make sense why there’s a central hole?
sure
and then you can see just by intuition that the outer radius grows as z increases in magnitude
wat
the outer radius of your disk is defined by z^2 + 2
as the |z| increases so will the outer radius of the disk
ah yes
so that’s why you end up with a sort of hourglass shape
the smallest radius occurs @ z=0 with a radius of sqrt(2)
what
then increases in both the positive and negative directions
,w hourglass
Failed to get a response from Wolfram Alpha.
If the problem persists, please contact support.
you mean a double cone?
if you prefer that description sure.
👍
i domt get it
what exactly are you struggling with?
everything
you just seemed to grasp the trace fine
dont get it
goodluck bro i hope you’re able to find it out
Closed by @simple musk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find the height of the box if it’s not given
intuitively
it's x
when you fold the sides up
the side's width is now the box's height
so yeah its x = 2
Yea
what happens when you fold that weird section upwards
Whats going on?
Ohh
its a square so the side are all equal to x
so the box's current side has the same width as x
And for this one I just don’t know what to do next at all
can you zoom in closer to the two questions
,rccw
Note that l=w
Oh yea
62 <= w+l+h, not w.l.h
ok for the first one you have l+w+h__<__62
let's assume the maximum since we want the maximum volume so l+w+h=62, now since the base is a square we can assume l=w so let's use 2w, you get 2w+h=62 and then you optimize
Wait why would it not be multiplication I thought the volume equation was L•W•H
it specifically said length+width+height
length+width+height must less than 62, it is the first sentence of the question
Oh okay but I’m still not sure what to do once I got h by its self
Well, have you learned derivative?
I don’t think so but I maybe might just don’t know the name
Okay, firstly, let's have w=l, right?
Now, we have $w+h+l\leq 62$, can you simplify it?
❤ Neferia ❤
I made it into h=62-L-W
But l = w?
Yea I know
Yea
Now, let's do $V=w \cdot h \cdot l$
❤ Neferia ❤
Can you substitute h in?
we knew $w = l$, so you can write it as: $V= l \cdot (62-2l) \cdot l$
❤ Neferia ❤
Oh yea
Can you keep simplifying them?
Not quite right, it would be $(62L-L^2) \cdot L$
❤ Neferia ❤
You are missing a bracket.
Ah ok
Can you keep multiplying L in?
Yes, in addition, I agree that derivative could be useful here.
Then we could set derivative = 0.
When you are done, feel free to send your solutions here.
62L^2-2L^3?
Correct!
I’m not sure what ti means to set the derivative to 0
Now, have you studied derivative?
Have you seen this before? @iron ore
Any of these notations?
No problem.
we haven’t don’t that we have been doing at some point in the problem finding the max or min and using those coordinates points
Oh, really? It won't be as fast as derivative then.
But... Hmm, this kind of problem do require derivative.
Can you elaborate on what does it means "coordinate points"?
This is the answer key
If I did it with the later version of the problem I did like the one with the l^3 would I still be able to put that in the calculator?
@iron ore Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
Do you have a specific question?
-# ig they just wanted to say hi lol
what is the question?
Its a possible troll he did it in another channel too
!done if you do not have a question, or please send one!
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Sorry
.close
Closed by @finite oasis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A 3D Cube, ABCD (Bottom Face) EFGH (Top Face).
P = Middle of EH
Q = Middle of FB
R = Middle of GC
T = Middle of EA
U = Middle of HD
V = Middle of BC
All the sides are 8cm distance, so point A to E is 8cm, B to C is 8cm, etc.
Find the closest distance from face PQR to face TUV...
Lets call P having a height of 8, therefore Q,R,T and U all have a height of 4. And V has height of 0
If we look at it, both faces are going down the same total distance (4) over the same length (8). Therefore, they have the same slope. So if they have the same slope, then the distence between them is constant. So we just need to find the distence between two convient points that are directly above eachother.
We can use P and the midpoint of UT. We have P=heright 8 and hieght of midpoint of UT is 4, then is distance is 8-4=4
Does that make sense?
The face of PQR to face of TUV isn't 4cm because it's not the closest distance
If it's that easy i wouldn't have asked here brochacho ;-;
If we have a center point of PQR and we take it straight down till it hits the face of TUV, then it'll be 4cm, but it's not the closest distance because its not perpendicular.
First off, PQR//TUV so distance from any points in PQR to TUV are the same, agree?
Yes
Now, can you see how BC is a line lie on plane TUV
Yes
The same for EH, you can see how EH is also on plane PQR
Now we find distance between E to TUV
Notice TU is perpendicular to EFBA
Which mean TUV is perpendicular to EFBA
Also treating the planes like lines on a coordinate plane then using a perpendicular transversal works, but I see you guys have got it covered
So is PQR
Which mean d(E, TUV) is just distance between E and TB
Did I go too fast?
Honestly, why not try coordinate and vectors, that might be easier
I know! but the test is about geometry ;-;
Nah, ill just fail this test, it's fine, thanks for the help tho <3
If you change your perspective to be directly looking at the face EFBA, you would see plane PQR as just the line EQ, and plane TUV as just TB
So their distance should be distance between EQ and TB
Or just distance from E to TB
Very intuitive way to think about it
.close
Closed by @honest compass
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m having trouble with the solution to question 2, specifically the step where the equation found for “a” is substituted and then related to log base 6 of 16. The question asks: if log base 12 of 27 equals a, calculate log base 6 of 16. (I would love a detailed explanation😇)
Is this your solution?
He wants to write log_6 16 in function of log_12 27
@tiny pike Has your question been resolved?
Português?
Yes
Essa questão parece ser dificil kkk
Vc consegue fazer?
gang
i did this exact question sometime ago
wait
Save us
Plis plis
ok. should i send the sol
or just hint
see. log12(27) = 3/ log12(3)
are we on the same page?
?
Do you mean this should be the answer?
no. this is step 1
It says I have to consider it as equal to a
can you send your work (if you did any)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can you express log4(3) as a / 3-a
Can you express your question more unambiguously?
brother. we are solving this question #help-42 message
it got timeout
I have to put the two equations together
ok
can you put log2(3) as 2a/ 3-a
Ig but in this case wouldn't really make sense to do so
