#help-42
1 messages · Page 6 of 1
Because not all the terms have a factor of x^2 that you can divide by
For you to divide by x^2 on the right side, that 5 would have to be 5x^2. If you did it that way on the left, you have 1 + 5/x^2
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @remote belfry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me understand composition matrices
If you look at the photo I don’t understand how to find a second transformed vector
@sage socket Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sage socket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can’t help on this lol
Oh ok
Can’t be sending exam questions in here bro
That says final examination?
Oh ok mb
Yea nw
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Sorry srry
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
missing dx?
yes
missing dx
i fogor 💀
but what should i do next?
what is the integral of 1
i know cos (2x) is sen (2x)
@velvet osprey
? The integral of a constant is the variable of integration
so like
$\int(C), dx=x$
KaiML
@remote mural
Not sure what you mean by sen. do you mean sin?
putting aside 1/2 for now, seperate the integrals:
$\int 1 , dx - \int \cos{2x}, dx $
welp texit gave up on me
ok, then for cos 2x you need to do a u-sub
let u=2x, then du/dx=2
then :
$\frac{1}{2}\int \cos{u} , du$
du
lol
KaiML
yeh
and then integral of cos is sin, then plug u=2x back in
then it should be pretty straightforward
Cx, not just x
welp yea forgot
Closed by @loud fox
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Consider the line L given by x + y = 1. Find a parameterization of this line, and then find a
parameterization for the image of this line under T. Add the image of the line to your plot.
how do i parse this question? What does it want? (LInear algebra)
for reference, i drew a plot of a graph that was transformed. Idk how to draw this line?
@whole jasper Has your question been resolved?
@whole jasper Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello! Please help me understand this
I do not understand the table
did you get this in a computer programming course?
I wanna understand the table
(I know this already)
Is this for Python?
I does
so...it's telling you that if you have decimals that exceed that many decimal places power of 10, you will lose accuracy with decimal parts smaller than what is in the second column
actually I understand why you are confused
and I am a little bit too
but I know this and this is what they are getting at
there is a fixed size (number of decimal places, at the end of it all) that any "number" can occupy with the "floating point" datatype
whether that be a number filling out decimals or a number that is in the millions or billions
does that mean 1,048,576 x 10 is the answer for 10? and 1,048,576 is for 1?
here's what I think it means
on the left column you have ascending powers of 10
starting from 1
climbing to 6
yes
I think it's saying that if you have a number with 2 decimal places (10^1), then the stored value will be accurate to a fractional part as small as 1/1,048,576
but if you get as large as the millions, the accuracy of the decimal part drops after you exceed1/16
What does the Hint part says
all of these numbers are powers of 2
on the right side
you lose bits the more decimal places you occupy
single-precision floating point is a 16-bit object (edited)
" values within -5,000/+5,000 are typically reliable " which row is the reliable in the table?
ah.
check out the figure in this wikipedia article
Single-precision floating-point format (sometimes called FP32 or float32) is a computer number format, usually occupying 32 bits in computer memory; it represents a wide dynamic range of numeric values by using a floating radix point.
A floating-point variable can represent a wider range of numbers than a fixed-point variable of the same bit wid...
some of those bits are RESERVED for exponentiation
single float is 16 bits
the largeness of the number
double float is 32 bits
yes, you have that right
I wanna know what does the hint part says
I wasn't paying attention
I guess it's saying that outside that range you start noticing the loss of accuracy
Blender fields will only display up to 4 decimal digits
like 0.1234?
yes
That mean this is the safe range?
they are
I am not sure based on what though
you can do an experiment
Matt Parker has done some of these
you try to store a number whose fractional value you know via float division and print what was stored
oh ok! I will check it out. Thanks mate for the help. I really appreciate it. You have a good day Sir!
.close
Closed by @limber robin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is from the old midterm, what would be the appropriate answer for this?
Hello
Maybe #❓how-to-get-help would be a better start
bruh
Can you tell the limit of right ride and left side of inéquation ?
Let's take for example the left side, -1-t²
So you can tell ^^
I think that's the point :p of the inequality being kinda "broken"
what do u think the answer is
What's important is what you think 👀 (cause I know the answer)
all you know is that your function lies between these two curves:
its an old midterm I already took
prof is just molasses at posting answers
thus I am here
😅
plz i just wanna know
it's easy to come up with functions that lie between those curves which have different limits as t->0, or no limit at all
why would you say I?
left and right do not exist
Yep. Cause the inequality does not gives enough information
that would be J then
for example, f(x) = 0 satisfies the conditions
f*ck multiple choice math midterms wtf 0 marks for that
but so does a function where you just assign random values that lie between those two curves
take for example (1/2)(sin(1/x) - 1) (assign any value you like at x=0), that function satisfies the inequalities but does not have a left or right limit as x->0
would a squeeze theorm ever prove a limit does not exist? I suppose not
yeah i see u can have like a peicewise function that satisfies it too i assume
it's not really a squeeze theorem here, all you really have is that the function fails to be squeezed as x->0
oh
it has enough room to do all sorts of wild things
hmm
whats the point of giving the interval
i feel like this comes into play somehow
man im actually malding rn tho why do multiple choice midterms exist for math wtf
all that really matters is that the domain includes an interval around t=0 (but not necessarily t=0 itself)
extreme laziness of instructor/grader, imo
it does not even come with the benefit of having it marked fast
ah gotcha so this is just an indication of bait
cus my prof is 100% the type of guy to
a) be like hey, find a point on this graph blah blah blah
but the point isent even on the graph
or b) probs be like find the limit as x approaches 0 but the interval does not include 0
he's literally setting up everyone to fail
it is a bit odd that he went to the effort of coming up with 8 numerical answers
in addition to "not enough info" and "does not exist"
ima rant here some more thats irrelvent
but thats not even the worst part
physics for me is marked with multiple choice
and its the type of stuff where
a) the multiple choice answers are SMALL errors like missed a negative somewhere, dident add this ect
b) the other answers rely on the previous
i feel like everyone is trying to make everyone fail
classic assholery
i recall an E&M exam i once had that was multiple choice with your same a) and b) properties, and it was only 10 questions long
so you could really wreck your score by just getting a sign wrong somewhere
like that answer and the next 3 would be wrong, and bingo, you failed
lmaoo why do they make it so randomly hard for like no sake
in addition why do they make the tests like always down the the last minute
its literally like "yeah it took me like 45 minutes to complete the exam so ill be nice and add another 5m for the students" - every prof
anyways
do u wanna help me with some linear algebra :D ?
i was just reading/watching a linear algebra video about AlphaZero apparently discovering some new matrix multiplication algorithms that improve slightly on the fastest known ones in existence, for certain matrix sizes
excellent
discovered using reinforcement learning
well I am a first year noob who barely knows what subspace is so maybe u can help
ha sure, fire away
Okay so this is homework, but people are allowed to help me as long as like they guide me through it/do a very similar problem as an example or something but just dont drop the answer on it
hmm, do you know about null spaces?
Ive never heard the term null space
ok
All what I know about sub spaces is
a) it is closed under addition
b) closed under scalar multiplication
c) contains 0 vector
first of all, you can simplify the equation
$\begin{bmatrix}x \ y \ z\end{bmatrix} \cdot \begin{bmatrix}1 \ 0 \ 1\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}x \ y \ z\end{bmatrix} \cdot \begin{bmatrix}2 \ -1 \ 1\end{bmatrix}$ is the same as $\begin{bmatrix}x \ y \ z\end{bmatrix} \cdot \begin{bmatrix}-1 \ 1 \ 0\end{bmatrix} = 0$
god i hate typsetting matrices
then with the simpler form, it's easier to verify the three conditions
you can see right away if you plug in x=y=z=0 that the equation is true for the zero vector, so c) is satisfied
you can check the other two directly
hmmm not sure what you did here
basically using the following property of dot products: $a \cdot (b + c) = (a \cdot b) + (a \cdot c)$
Bungo
you don't have to make that simplification if you don't want to, it just makes the rest of the work a bit easier
Bungo
(sorry the RHS of the second equation should be the scalar zero, not the zero vector, i fixed it)
ah okay so you moved the matricies to all one side
i kinda forgot u can do that
/did not know for some reason I thought U could not
showing more steps: $\begin{bmatrix}x \ y \ z\end{bmatrix} \cdot \begin{bmatrix}1 \ 0 \ 1\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}x \ y \ z\end{bmatrix} \cdot \begin{bmatrix}2 \ -1 \ 1\end{bmatrix}$
is the same as
$\begin{bmatrix}x \ y \ z\end{bmatrix} \cdot \begin{bmatrix}1 \ 0 \ 1\end{bmatrix} - \begin{bmatrix}x \ y \ z\end{bmatrix} \cdot \begin{bmatrix}2 \ -1 \ 1\end{bmatrix} = 0$
is the same as
$\begin{bmatrix}x \ y \ z\end{bmatrix} \cdot \left(\begin{bmatrix}1 \ 0 \ 1\end{bmatrix} - \begin{bmatrix}2 \ -1 \ 1\end{bmatrix}\right) = 0$
is the same as
$\begin{bmatrix}x \ y \ z\end{bmatrix} \cdot \begin{bmatrix}-1 \ 1 \ 0\end{bmatrix} = 0$
Bungo
btw, once you learn about null spaces you can rewrite that last dot product as $\begin{bmatrix}-1 & 1 & 0\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}x \ y \ z\end{bmatrix} = 0$
Bungo
oh boy
and therefore the set of vectors satisfying the equation is just the null space of the matrix $\begin{bmatrix}-1 & 1 & 0\end{bmatrix}$
not today i already suck at linear algebra
Bungo
btw, geometrically this is just a plane that passes through the origin and which has (-1, 1, 0) as a normal vector
and any plane passing through the origin is a subspace
man wtf how do you know that I wish to harness your skills thats like 90% of this class so far
haha, i've studied more linear algebra than you, that's all
u just figured that out in 5 minutes that would take me 5 days
it will eventually be obvious to you haha
btw I dont see
how there would ever be a case where like any vector in general could not be transformed to contain the 0 vector
that might not make sense but what im trying to say is
how would you test that c) is ever false
suppose that instead of your equation we instead had $$\begin{bmatrix}x \ y \ z\end{bmatrix} \cdot \begin{bmatrix}-1 \ 1 \ 0\end{bmatrix} = 1$$ (so a 1 on the RHS instead of a 0)
Bungo
then if you plug in x=y=z=0 you get 0 on the LHS but 1 on the RHS, so the zero vector does not satisfy the equation
hence the set of solutions to this equation is not a subspace
(it is a slightly more general thing called an affine space, which is a plane that does not necessarily pass through the origin)
interesting, now I am intrigued on why a subspace has to contain 0
basically because a subspace is itself a vector space by definition
and all vector spaces contain 0
as to why that's a useful definition, it's basically because null spaces and images of are very useful when investigating linear maps, and null spaces and images are always subspaces
gotcha
alrighty so, we have proven c)
now for b) closed under scalar multiplication
my understanding of that is
not the best
I think its where
for that, you want to show that if (x,y,z) is a solution to the equation, then so is c(x,y,z) where c is an arbitrary scalar
if you have some scalar C and you scale the subspace in question its still contained in the subspace? - but it does not make alot of sense cus like when wouldent it/would it
if you go back to my last example, with the 1 on the RHS, notice that (x,y,z) = (1,2,0) is a solution, but c(1,2,0) is not in general e.g. take c=0
copying it here for reference
ok sorry this is a low level question but is an unfortunate hole in my knowledge, how would I know that (1,2,0) is a solution
what's the dot product of (1,2,0) and (-1,1,0)
oh i see it is 1
right
how would you find solutions?
but if i multiply (1,2,0) by a scalar (other than 1) then that also scales the dot product by the same factor
i just found one by picking x=1 and working out what y and z would work
there are infinitely many solutions
mmm, what if the numbers were big and ugly
basically pick any number you like for 2 of the coordinates and solve for the third
example:
we want to find a solution to (x,y,z) . (-1,1,0) = 1, let's try letting y=1 and z=1
then the dot product becomes -x + 1
and that needs to be equal to 1
so -x + 1 = 1
solve for x, you get x=0
so (x,y,z) = (0,1,1) is a solution
Ooh okay I see
Im just repasting it here
gotcha so now I know what b) and c) means
so a subspace must contain the 0 vector (because a subspace is essentially a vector space)
and a subspace must be closed under scalar multiplication
yes
wait well err where do I go from here because I mean, I dont think it equaling 0 is closed under scalar multiplication
no those are two separate conditions
you have to show that both are true
although technically you can deduce that it contains the zero vector from the fact that is closed under scalar multiplication
because you can choose the scalar to be zero
right
however that assumes that it contains at least one vector
right
but you're trying to show that this is a subspace
you don't already know that it is
so to do that
you show:
c) it contains the zero vector, i.e. it contains at least one vector
b) it is closed under scalar multiplication
a) it is closed under vector addition
indeed indeed
okay
so for b ima just try randomly expanding it out and seeing what I get
I get x + z = 2x -y +z
so
-x = -y , x = y
z = 0
wait
you can't conclude this part: ```
-x = -y , x = y
z = 0
this part is true: x + z = 2x -y +z
but all this tells you (rearrange and simplify) is that x = y
so any vector (x,y,z) with x=y is a solution
and those are the only solutions
hmm
so to prove that the set of solutions is closed under scalar multiplication, basically it boils down to showing that if x=y then cx = cy for any scalar c
Im not sure where to go from here, I can substitute x = y into the matrix but idk what good that does me
hmmm gotcha one second let me ponder
do I just be like
c(x) = c(y)
oh wonderful
hence if (x,y,z) is a solution, so is c(x,y,z)
I don't really understand that
all I see what we proved is that x = y and thus c(x) = c(y)
and thus its closed for (x,y,z)
you established that (x,y,z) is a solution if and only if x=y
i.e. a vector is a solution if its first two coordinates are equal
so suppose (x,y,z) is a solution, which means x=y
we want to show that c(x,y,z) is a solution
now c(x,y,z) is the same as (cx,cy,cz)
it will be a solution if its first two coordinates are equal, i.e. if cx = cy
but this is true
because we know that x=y
and we can just multiply that by c to see that cx = cy
ah gotcha!
this brings me back to the days where i was learning algebra for the first time in idk 3rd grade and I was asking my dad for help on how to solve x-3=0 and was super lost and embarrassed
this feels like that
you have been super helpful so far and i fr appreciate it
it's a different way of thinking than you have most likely done so far
a bit more abstract
takes some getting used to
but you will get the hang of it after a while
wholesome moment
but success I now understand c) and b)
now it is time to prove closed under addition
you can proceed similarly to how you did the scalar multiplication
suppose you have two vectors (x,y,z) and (u,v,w) that are solutions
therefore x=y and u=v
the goal is to show that (x,y,z) + (u,v,w) is a solution
how would you do that?
no it's simpler than that
remember that you determined the condition for a solution: the first two coordinates are equal
so you want to find out:
are the first two coordinates of (x,y,z) + (u,v,w) equal?
you tell me
ima say yes
they are, but you have to show why
because
wait nvm my explanation I was thinking does not show it
1 sec lemme think
if
x = y is a solution for the first
and
u = v is a solution for the second (x = y)
they are then equal
i think
go back to the question you need to answer: are the first two coordinates of (x,y,z) + (u,v,w) equal?
what is the first coordinate of (x,y,z) + (u,v,w)?
well if you know that x=y and u=v
does x+u = y+v ?
try adding the two equations x=y and u=v together
ohh I see I see
okay sweet :D
now I should be able to tackle this problem on my own tomorrow, thanks alot Bungo!!
I will try this on my own tomorrow (go to bed now) and see where I get, do you mind If I send you a FR and maybe ask you some questions later on? All good if not, just you were insanely helpful today :)
sure, i mean i can't guarantee that i'll be available to answer, so your best bet is a help channel if you need quick help
'tis 1 am for me now, what about for you?
goodnight fellow night owl, and again thanks for the help :)
cheers, good luck!
.close
Closed by @atomic haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have the inequality sqrt(1 + 4x^2) > 2|x|. I noticed that whenever you change the |x| s.t. x < 0, you flip the inequality so that sqrt(1 + 4x^2) < -2x. But, this is clearly incorrect because the left hand side is positive and the right hand side is negative. So, when are you allowed to flip inequalities when absolute values?
wdym?
@runic laurel https://www.shmoop.com/alg2-equations-inequalities/av-inequalities.html
When you have an absolute value equation, you flip the inequality whenever x < 0.
Yes, Absolute Value Inequalities isn't particularly exciting. But it can, at least, be enjoyable. We dare you to prove us wrong.
Or is that only when you’re solving for x?
Right, and I’m consider the case when x < 0.
So, I change |x| to -x
Yeah, I agree.
But, what if x <= 0?
omg im actually scuffing this
never type latex on a phone
Lol you’re good. So, why is it that I see sometimes that the inequality gets flipped for absolute value equations?
the inequality is never flipped
you only flip the inequality when you have a order reversing transformation
Oh, it’s only flipped if you divide the negative, but adding the negative in doesn’t flip it right?
you don't add a negative
there is no changing
you don't go like
2 > 1 so 2 < -(-1)
that makes no sense
Okay, for some reason I thought you flipped inequalities when going from |x| to -x
But that clearly makes no sense
You only flip it when you divide by negative
Or multiply by negative
Okay, thanks
.close
Closed by @worldly plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is the probability that the face with 6 points will appear for the first time on the fourth throw of a perfect die?
For a 6 to appear for the first time on the fourth throw, the die must display a number other than 6 on the first three throws followed by a 6 on the fourth throw. Try calculating that probability
p = 5/6 • 5/6 • 5/6 • 1/6
5/6 is the probability of getting another number,not 6, right?
Yes, as there are 5 other numbers and 6 numbers total.
Closed by @small prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is this wrong
.close
Closed by @wise stag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't know why you would be asked to do something like this without linear algebra
Isolate y
Is it possible to find the value ?
Or like express x y z in terms of a and b
a b x y and z
This kind of linear algebra has a name?
Since i havent learn it
Do you have any examples?
Sorry, i dont know that language
Determine the number of solutions of the following system depending on the values of the parameters a and b:
I used google translate
I assume you know gaussian elimination and stuff?
so basically, our goal is to just calculate the rank of the augmented matrix, i.e by putting one of the row as a pivot row, and see whether or not it's true as an equation
@raw viper Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @raw viper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@quartz juniper Has your question been resolved?
@quartz juniper Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
Proof questions are such a pain
@light wharf Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this correct
i just reversed (-2,3)
and did (3,-2)
but idk what the (3) inside the equation does to it
.close
Closed by @native swallow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
valid
i think i would do this via integration
$$\dd{m} = \delta(r) \dd{A}$$
$$M = \int_0^5 \delta(r) \dd{A}(r)$$
it remains to find the area element if you integrate using small circles
nvx
also, polar coordinates are your friend
@bronze rune do you need further help?
for example with the integral
.close
Closed by @pine topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i write h=a(t-0)(t-10) in vertex and standard form
@terse badge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont understand this please help
@upbeat bear Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do 54
have you graphed it
Yes
what does it look like
graph cosine
it’s the exact opposite
@fossil pebble Has your question been resolved?
@fossil pebble Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This one has got me rattled, I don't exactly know where to begin here, can I get a hand
tan(t-pi) is tan(t) translated along the x axis by +pi, as tan repeats every pi, it should just be the same i believe
Yeah I think that's correct, I tried tinkering around and I think that's right
Thanks.
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wispy knot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @final mulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
not sure how to solve this
,w plot (2pi)^(-1/2)e^(-x^2/9)
right?
where did -1/2 come from
1/sqrt(a) = a^-1/2
and we rotate this around the y axis
i'm not sure what you are trying to do, there should be a double integral i think
because you integrate a volume
not an area
oh my bad then i didnt understand what they wanted
or maybe i did but their way of answering is weird
i dont understand how he went to solve it at the end
i tried putting in the last answer i had in a calculator and got it wrong
and dont make you set up the actual double integral
makes sense
how did the the square of x disappear
the 3 also disappeared in the vid
-x^2/3
and he got v = sqrt 2pi (1 - 1/sqrt of e
so assuming the formula, this is correct
now lets integrate this
since whats inside the exponential is a x²
we dont need to do much
either you can eyeball it if you feel confident
or you can use u-sub
y = -x²/9
or y= x²/9
but are you supposed to know?
i dont think so
okay then we'll do it the eyeball way
you have something of the form e^x²
in your integral
yes
since the derivative of e^x is itself
the antiderivative will also involve your exponential
it will likely be e^-x²/9
times something
ok ok
let me write it for 2 min it'll be clearer
1.317 is this the right answer
hmm
u used chain rule to get -9/2 outside
the key point is what's at the beginning
i notice that the x
is almost like the derivative of what's inside the exponential function
so i make appear the (-2/9)
by multiplying by (-9/2) *(-2/9)
which is equal to 1
okay
and then i exactly have
so its 1/e now
do we sqrt the e
why would we
?
where did the e go then
( 1 - 1/sqrt e)
i dont know why we are using chain rule when i think they are asking to use shell method

ok
do you get this?
no
first equality is ok?
yea
then we get the -9/2 outside of the integral
and whats left inside is exatcly the derivative of e^(-x²/9)
so we can integrate easily
okay
now it makes more sense, how do we go about simplifying it
do you get those two steps fully?
yes
do you not know whatr the brackets with 0 and 1 written on the right corners mean?
this
exactly
you dont know?
yes
yeah now it makes me question if you know what an integral is
how would you calculate this?
with a calculator
arent you in a calculus course?
you dont know how to integrate polynomials?
yes
integrals
its a bit wide
geometric sum
are you at the very beginning of it?
middle
we using hooks law
finding indefinite integrals
isnt hooks law something about springs and physics?
yes
it's alright Benjamin you tried your best with me
I stopped learning math in 9th grade
yeah its hard to come back
but if you try to pass by the fundamentals it'll be impossible later on
this will be the last class for calc
im doing khan academy starting from algebra
and then will move on to trig and calc 1 and 2
i learned absolute value yesterday
no im in a college class
but self learning rn to catch up
i suggest you find someone irl
too help you
a tutoring programm or a maths club or something
definitely, it's hard to get these concepts by myself
my tutor just solves the questions for me
its not that its hard
its that you are supposed to have prior knowledge and abilities
and since everything moves fast
you dont have time to come back to basics
true
and must learn methods to solve things
without understanding anything
try essence of calculus by 3b1B
on youtube
its very useful to get an insight on whats happening
will watch him
i think i watched a video by him
where there is a society of dominant ppl and submissive
red and blue
and how it works
it was fun
bet
i'm not sure but many people use the code he developped to animate maths
oh alright
.close
Closed by @clever ruin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a question
x = 6y - 1 / y + 3
is our equation
and for what value y takes we cannot find x
ok i already solved the equation answer is 6
my question is
apparently when u get the ratio of the coefficients of y
basically 6/1 here
u get the answer
why
wheres the proof. why does it work
does it always work
is it cuz the slope or whatever
What is 6. This is diaphantine equation
what do you mean
i already told you
if x is 6 it would mean we cannot find y
thats what the question says
<@&286206848099549185>
@dawn narwhal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you set this up
Do you need to use polar coordinates
This is what I got for the set-up but I’m not really sure why, I’m just converting to polar coordinates and plugging in what looks right without a solid understanding of why you use triple integral instead of double, and why the bounds go from 0
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
You use triple integral because it's a 3 dimensional solid, with sides that are funky
bounds go from zero on theta because 0 -> 2pi will cover the whole circle, on r because stops at 0, and on z because the xy plane is the bottom bound
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How does one do this
@keen sundial Has your question been resolved?
@keen sundial Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @keen sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
still having trouble with this problem, even when i use the f inverse prime of a formula i still can't tell which one is wrong
@lethal radish Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @eager lily
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
what's your question
how does arg(z-4) - pi/2 mean that x = 4
let z = x+yi
arg(x + yi - 4) = pi/2
arg(x - 4 + yi) = pi/2
tan(y/(x-4)) = pi/2
y/(x-4) = arctan(pi/2)
since arctan(pi/2) tends to infinity we need to have x = 4 and y > 0
notice that if x = 4 then we have arg(yi)
now you can see it's true for y > 0
because
in fact we have something positive divided by 0^+
it tends to inf
also
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im confused on the last part
the tans
i get why its tan(y/x)
im just struggling to get my head around it
if arg(z) is tan(y/x) then why is tan(arg(z)) = the angle
is the angle arg(z)?
we don't take tan of arg(z)
arg(z) is already tan
in this case we take arctan on both sides and in this case arctan(tan(y/(x-4)) = y/(x-4) because it's pi/2
$$\arg (z) = \tan \Big(\frac{y}{x}\Big)=\varphi \ \text{(angle)}$$
Modus
so the original equation is saying arg(z) = angle
and we can say arg(z) = tan(y/x)
to find y and x?
yes
Closed by @prisma aspen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is the reason i was confused
why is it tan of the angle here?
instead of tan(y/x)
because they've skipped the step
aa sorry, mb I've told you it's tan(y/x), it should be tan^(-1)(y/x)
okay yes that makes more sense
$$\arg (z) = \tan^-1 \Big(\frac{y}{x}\Big)=\varphi \ \text{(angle)}$$
kirkychicken
yep
okay yes thank you
@remote mural Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @prisma aspen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I had a math test today and there was a question i could not really wrap my head around nor understand how to even progress on and i would really like to solve it and understand it. You needed to decide the variable a so that the equation was correct.
can you express the left side as a single power of x
and you should have an idea of how to continue
hmm
no i still need more help, don't know how to continue from this one
fyi i'm 16 and i've just began highschool in sweden, things are a little sluggish from me and math atm
it should be quite Intuitive
imma see if geogebra can solve this one for me
im thinking Solve(2a - 8 = 1/3)
not quite
yeah no
right
you should have the equation
8-2a = 1/3
right this should explain why
geogebra ain't helpinh
but i think i got an idea
8-2a = 1/3 |:2
4-a = 1/6
-4
-a = 1/6 - 4
-a = 1/6 - 24/6
-a = -23/6 |: -1
a = 23/6
nice
Seem right?
Someone?
Thanks alot @dull wagon
.close
Closed by @lime fox
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im very confused with this and cant find any help with google
ive tried answers R, 3R, R/3, and R^3
@celest epoch Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@celest epoch Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @celest epoch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey
So I have these 6 graphs, where the x axis is gpu temperature, the y axis is cpu temperature, and each graph is a different core affinity
All of them are described by a 2nd order polynomial function
And they appear to be, somewhat, linearly connected
How do I get all 6 of these functions, as one function, that has both the GPU temperature, and core affinity, as one function, to determine CPU temperature
@paper prairie Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
“How many distinct ways can five letters be posted in four distinct mailboxes?”
Apparently the answer is 3^5 but idk how
@frank valve Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @frank valve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You have an expression a + b = c, where
a = c - b
b = c - a
c = a + b
If you eliminate the expression (a + b = c where a = c - b, b = c - a and c = a + b you get -2a - 2b + 2c = 0) and the given question (a + b = c) you get answer no. 1 . Then continue simplifying the expression with (a = c - b, b = c - a and c = a + b) . Every time you simplify the expression eliminate with the answer no. 1, 2, 3 till infinity.
man thats a lot of a b c
xD
lol
wdym by
you get answer no. 1 .
not what i asked
answer to what
what are you saying is 1
also a+b=c is an equation not an expression
it has a little sense cause a = c - b, b = c - a, c = a + b implies a + b = c
