#help-41
72900 messages Ā· Page 73 of 73 (latest)
you already di this part!
Now you were going on the correct track here
Just do the same thing for the denominator asw!!
same logic as you aplplied here but with a better result
It wont give you a form like we got before, aka inf * 0 or 0/0
Lol thats fine!
Yeah you are!!
then multply top and bottom by 1/x to put it in the form a/x right
Yeah!
Do lmk what you get in the numerator and denominator after putting all such terms with a/x or a/(x^2) form as 0!!
3/2
Thats correct good job!!
oh you mean graphically
Yeah
how I kinda guessed that
my teacher never went over the properties of limits
so like all I know about them is using them for endbehavior at VA
im lost I only knew to plug in x as 0 because of this
x as 0??
Ah i see
Ok guys what happen where we all stuck
Sometimes we may not get the best teacher but again it also plays a role on ones resolve to learn
on philosophy
Ic no one taught me that i shoud learn
You think more than what you think you thought
so the reason why we can set it to 0 is because when were taking a lim were taking the num were apporaching
Brain is not braining that what u wanna say?
thats what I thought and is why I mentioned the VA thing cuz thats what we used lims for so far
like setting x as a num extremly close to the asym to find endbehavior
Yeah thats what x tending to infinity means!
Closed by @rapid plaza
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
I need help with this
$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(2n)! + 2^n}{(n!)^2 \cdot 5^n + \sqrt{n!}}$
KevinSnow
I cant know if its convergant or not
(In the future, please make the first message you send the actual question since that's what the bot pins. This saves us the effort of having to change the pin manually.)
which of the terms in the denominator is largest?
for large n
think about the numerator too
Closed by @sacred sphinx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
You are welcome, have a nice day!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone help me derive d<p>/dt ?
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
2
Iām struggling to get to the part where stuff will cancel to give me the answer. I donāt know if Iām making some stupid little mistakes or if Iām missing something
My chemistry teacher gave me an introduction to quantum mechanics pdf but I donāt think Iām ready for it. My teachers donāt know what to do so I was wondering you guys could help me out?
idk wtf i am even looking az
Itās deriving ehrenfestās theorem
you haven't defined anything in here so it's impossible to tell what depends on t and what doesn't
you should really just read the pdf
there's plenty of proofs of this theorem online
Ehrenfest's Theorem
Ok thanks. Iāve been reading the pdf but at the end of each chapter there are questions to check your understanding. Iāll look into those links
.close
Closed by @worldly merlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Have a nice day!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yo, I still have a question unanswered regarding directional derivatives , why is that if we need a derivative in a specific direction of a unit vector we multiply the partial wrt x with the first component of the unit vector and the derivative wrt y with the second component of the unit vector ?
Yeah sorry thatās not helping I need someone to explain the geometric intuition for me
"why" is the proof
@lime ingot Has your question been resolved?
Azyrashacorki
See this
A directional derivative gives the slope in any particular direction, similar to partial derivatives which give the slope just in the x or y directions. We formally define directional derivatives by modifying the familiar limit definition of the derivative for when you move along some vector in the input space. Then we see a very nice feature th...
I did but it didnāt help
I just need someone to explain to me the intuition I just work best when talkin about it
Like just the intuition behind the multiplication part thatās it
The point is that this is the intuition
Itās that way because if you write down what you want it to mean to take a directional derivative, you end up with the dot product
I know but why tho
Why is it that if you take two partial derivatives and combine them while multiplying each one with one component of the unit vector work
Because the partial in x gives you how f changes in the x direction and similarly with the partial in y.
If you go in some other direction (a,b), then the change in f will be some amount in the x direction proportional to a + some amount in the y direction proportional to b, and those amounts are specifically the partials.
if you're asking about why multiplication specifically, i'd think about it like this:
as azyrashacorki said, partial derivative in x gives you how f changes in the x direction. Say that it it's = 2 and so it's 2 f-units / 1 x-unit. Now say that the component of your direction vector in the x-direction is 1/2. So it says that we move 1/2 x-unit. Now if f changes by 2 f-units per 1 x-unit and we move 1/2 x-unit, that means that the total change in f is just 2 * 1/2 = 1 f-unit. Notice the multiplication
I got lost at:
āIf you go in some other direction (a,b), then the change in f will be some amount in the x direction proportional to a + some amount in the y direction proportional to b, and those amounts are specifically the partials.ā
Specifically āproportional to a + some amount in the y direction proportional to bā
So you mean say you find a derivative in the x direction at some specific point and you get 2?
Is this kind if like a linear combination?
Or am I going too far
Why does this just seem like linear combination @full elk @pseudo crescent
it is a linear combination
because the differential at a point is a linear map
think of derivatives as "best linear approximation of the functions"
So are you basically scaling the components of the unit vector and combining them into a new vector ?
Oh And is that why it needs to be a unit vector
in this case you get a scalar because the image of g lies in R
Yeah I think Iām wrong
Mb I donāt get it tho
think about the tangent plane of the curve: its slope in the x direction is dg/dx and in the y direction it is dg/dy
Sure
I mean wouldnāt that be infinite tangent lines in the x direction and vise versa
Yeah at a point yes
But given a function
And being told to find its direction vector you start by computing its general partials
Right
Can we go up from here
sure
So now you have infinite tangent lines going in the x direction
And infinite tangent lines in the y direction
And youāre given a unit vector
only one tangent line no?
At some direction
If youāre finding the general partial derivatives without a specific point? No
yeah without a specific point ok
Yeah so say youāre given some point now and a unit vector
So the point will narrow the infinite tangent lines to two lines directly perpendicular to one another
Now the vector part is where Iām lost
Like the direction
ok so picture the tangent plane. the whole plane equation is dictated by the two slopes in the x and y direction
Sure
so the plane equation is like z = ax + by right
a = dg/dx ; b = dg/dy
so if you take a vector, the formula for the derivative gives the height of the plane at the vector-point-direction
Weāre thinking of <a,b> as a vector right
a and b are scalars here I think
Wait how did you derive the equation
but it could work with vectors
also I centered the plane at 0,0,0
and this height, for a unit vector, is equal to the slope in this direction (because rise over run)
I suggest playing around in desmos if you can
Honestly itās here where you lost me
Are you down to go over that?
@lime ingot Has your question been resolved?
a general non vertical plane equation has that form right
the tangent plane has equation $$z = g(x_0, y_0) + (x - x_0) \frac{\partial g}{\partial x}(x_0, y_0) +(y - y_0) \frac{\partial g}{\partial y}(x_0, y_0)$$
bloubbloub
now for the sake of simplicity, take x0 = y0 = g(x0, y0) = 0
This is the same as translating the 3D space such that the point we are considering lies at the origin
then you get something like $$z =x \frac{\partial g}{\partial x}(0, 0) +y \frac{\partial g}{\partial y}(0, 0)$$
bloubbloub
which is what I did earlier
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
inf is not a real number, so the division is undefined
when is division undefined
yes
yes
@wild iris Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wild iris
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can I get some help with b)?
let me translate but the gist is that they want me to prove this propositions using the ordered field axioms
@tough mica Has your question been resolved?
Renato
here is the translated problem
i still need help with b)
i know the ordered field axioms a little bit
but idk how to use them like that
i did a) but was different
Isnt b) basically an axiom.
yeah... wtf
exactly dude...
what is there to prove??
c doesnt change the order in the inequality
my friend just said that and moved on with the exercises
Well, it isnt axiomatic in itself, it can be proven by rearranging the relation
@tough mica Has your question been resolved?
care to elaborate
Substract bc from both sides
what do I start with?
Nope, start at ac <= bc
but thats what I want to prove, I cant start with what I am trying to prove
you see what I mean?

you can reason from (a-b)c <= 0 into proving that the case is true
i cant start from this, then the proof is circular
the (a-b)c <= 0 is just a reorganization of the thing you want to prove. Not the proof itself
Since substracting the same element from both sides and then later distribution is axiomatic for an ordered field
Althought you could start from
a =< b
a-b =< 0, a-b = X in F
X =< 0
Xc =< 0
But youd have to also prove that if X =< 0, c > 0 ==> Xc =< 0 > Since this one isnt an axiom itself
@tough mica a <= b implies a = b or a < b
If a = b then ac = bc so ac <= bc.
If a < b then
b - a > 0
The axiom of closure of positives under multiplication gives
(b - a) * c > 0
Using the distributive law
bc - ac > 0
so ac < bc, so ac <= bc as desired.
@tough mica Has your question been resolved?
simple proof : if a <= b and c > 0, divide the cases
Case 1: a < b
then by the order-compatibility axioms of the ordered field, it follows that ac < bc.
Case 2: a = b
then clearly ac = bc.
Adding up the results, we have that ac <= bc
renato what did you disagree with in this?
@tough mica Has your question been resolved?
-# what degree are you doing renato? (just curious)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I literally cannot figure this out
I tried using the point distance formula of modulus Ax+By+C/(sqrt a^2+b^2)
but at one point it gets too complex and I can continue no further because simplification makes no sense
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
Can u show me where it get complex
okok wait
<@&268886789983436800>
(might take a min, im recharging my phone to take the pic) š
K sure take your time!
Just a quick point out, here it should be A and B in denominator right?
maybe you went wrong there?
oh nonon, forgot to capitalise
Ah okay
So the 2 points make a horizontal line (lie on the x axis)
This means that $\theta$ should be limited to some specific values so that the line given has to be a vertical
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
What??
Wait gang he showing his work
I think 1/0 may have misinterpreted the Qsn
.
this guy
guys funny thing, i was redoing mah working and missed one trig identity application, it simplfiied to b^2 š
imma send it now
phone charged
Ah okay!
I didn't understand what you said earlier about 1/0 man my english weak did u said anything about me ?
wasnt so hard in reterospect
my previous working was just shabby so i think i missed the identity
No not you, there is a guy here whos named 1 divided by 0
Oh kk
wow ok nvm idk why i missed this
That nice š
Closed by @abstract glen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
No one did anything you did all work š
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I feel like I am doing this one wrong
,rccw
the last step is wrong, you can't factor out sin(x) like that
but there's a better way to solve this
Until here i asusme it's correct because i don't know the identities
use the second formula
Ohh
Try it: $$\cos(2x) = 2\cos^2(x) - 1$$
Ga³¹Br³āµIāµĀ³9000ā
But idk how you got to this
you get a quadratic in cos(x)
If I add cos(x) to cos^2(x) does that equal cos(x)?
I donāt know how to simplify this more
I made sin^2x into 1-cos^2x but I donāt know how to combine the like terms
$\cos^2(x) + \cos(x)$ is not equal to $\cos(x)$
Ga³¹Br³āµIāµĀ³9000ā
,rotate
?
You need factorise.
Why am I getting two different answers based on the method I used? I donāt know which is correct
The problem is that your factoring at the checkout is wrong.
If you multiply $(\cos x + 1)(\cos x - 1)$ it gives you $\cos^2 x - 1$, and you are missing that 2 at the beginning and the $+\cos x$ in the middle.
Ga³¹Br³āµIāµĀ³9000ā
What wdym ag the checkout
In the box.
Remember you have to set each parenthesis of the factorization to zero:
Wdym
arenāt they already set to zero?
Or 1?
I donāt really know what you mean by set them to zero
$(2\cos x - 1) = 0$ and $(\cos x + 1) = 0$
Ga³¹Br³āµIāµĀ³9000ā
Iām confused
Isnāt that the last step after finding the gcf?
And we wouldnāt do it with the equation from the previous step?
Like wouldnāt I set cos^2x to zero
You can't match single terms like cos^2 x because there are other numbers adding and subtracting. It only works when they multiply.
So can I just set two cosx to zero?
You can't separate the 2 from the rest.
I think I was able to do it when I did it in the box
Iām not sure which is the third step
Isnāt the third step just pyth identities ?
Iām confused
I just distributed the -
In cos=2/3 remember that the cos is negative and the other the cos is 1.
Oh so it would be equal to pi? Also what 2/3 are you talking about?
Yeah!
-1/2 not 1/2.
@stable cloud Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
yes
Yes.
Correct!
Yup
Do you have more questions?
Itās actually one of the 3 main properties of the = sign
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
You are welcome!
yes
go to settings
Ok
Click on adop tag or in configuration.
Don't troll
does kinda seem like trolling cuz they have the undergrad role
but maybe they just didnt select the correct one
I have not met a single person in my life who doesn't know that x = y means y = x. Especially not an Undergraduate
And look at #help-2 if you aren't convinced
looks like the message got deleted
@charred mantle Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @spiral zealot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@steel sandal (whoops- didnt mean to reply ping, sorry)
For others - the original question was why complex number are represented on a 2D plane
Our 2 basic operations are addition and multiplication, so lets look at what those do to a real number line first
Addition basically shifts the number line. E.g. adding 1 to every number makes it shift right by one unit (0 moves to where 1 was, 1 moves to where 2 was, ...) you can drag the 0-point in the graph I sent and see for yourself
once you come back, lmk @steel sandal
@pseudo crescent Has your question been resolved?
ill just try to explain the rest and you can read it later
multiplication stretches the number line
now the natural thing to ask would be if there is a number system, that would let us do similar stuff on a 2D plane - now that we know that the real number system lets us do some interesting geometry on 1D line
So we add another axis and a unit corresponding to it - lets call it i (note that we dont know whether i^2 = -1 yet, we just make up a new unit and give it a name i)
now what happens when we add e.g. 2 + 1i?
||The whole grid shifts 2 units right and 1 unit up, a + bi + (2 + 1i) will be (a+2) + (b+1)i, so every point moves 2 units to the right and 1 unit up||
||So addition basically shits the grid again, adding real numbers creates left and right shift and imaginary numbers create up and down shift||
Now what should happen if we multiply it by something?
We certainly want the following 2 things to hold:
0 * x = 0, so 0 will not move, it will stay in place
1 * x = x, so 1 will move to whatever x we are multiplying by
lets first look at what multiplying by omething purely real should do
for the 1D real number line, it simply stretched it
so we should expect some kind of stretch in here as well
for example 2 * 2 should still be 4, so the effect on the horizontal direction should again be stretching
and regarding the vertical direction, we will want e.g. 2 * 2i to be 4i, so multiplying imaginary stuff by real numbers should also stretch it in the vertical direction. So we are stretching it both directions
Now both addition and multiplication by reals make the grid to kind of preserve its shape
it only glides around at gets bigger / smaller
so we will want multiplication by other numbers - such as 1 + 2i to do the same
but since 0 has to go to 0 and 1 has to go to 1 + 2i, there is really only one way to do it
we just slide 1 to 1 + 2i and make the grid such that it preserves its shape
so it kind of forces it to rotate
so addition of this new number system does shifting left, right and up, down
multiplication does stretching and rotating
also notice that if we multiply by this new unit i, it basically causes a 90° rotation
but what happens if we do it twice?
it will be a 90° rotation, followed by a 90° rotation - a 180° rotation, or a "flip"
but -1 also does that
so multiplying by i twice results in the same effect as multiplying by -1
i * i = -1
so this new i unit must be the square root of -1
So to sum it all up:
-
we looked at how the real number line behaves geometrically under addition and multiplication
-
we tried to extend the pattern and find a 2D number system that does the same
-
this number system turns out to be the complex number system
so to answer your question, why are complex numbers plotted on a 2D plane, one of the reasons is that its just really, really useful
so useful that I just used that alone to rediscover complex numbers
there are 2 main reasons why complex numbers are useful in math:
- with complex numbers, we can finally solve / factor all polynomials
- complex numbers have a really nice geometric interpretation in the 2D plane
usually the motivation for introducing the complex numbers is the first reason, but I honestly think that the second reason could also be used to "discover" complex numbers
and by discovering them this way, your question is answered automatically
soo that's all, you can ping me anywhere or DM me if youve any questions
.close
Closed by @pseudo crescent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
oh and btw if you wanna check the graph:
SR controls addition / multiplication in reals
SC controls addition / multiplication in complex
and you can click the folder icons to hide / show the real and compelx graphs
wow man i need a cup of tea to read thos
this
hold on
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why was I timed out ?
Dm @dense tiger
?
Not here
Ok sorry
. close
for?
I want to ask something
Ask here then!
And also
Its a mth doubt?
Asking the actual question right away is more likely to get responses.
Asking "Can I ask...?" or "Does anyone know about...?" doesn't give people enough information to decide whether they can help, and answering can feel like a promise to help with the actual question, which they might find themselves unable to.
What are the factors to 2x^2 + 3x + 91^3 ?
You sure thats right?
Because you are trolling.
My friends asked me this
Idk what to answer
Is the question wrong ?
Yeah this expression isnt factorisable acc to me since the discrimanant is not only -ve
its factorable in complex plane though
But also the fact that the question is incomplete
Ok thank you @stoic valley
u could say 2x^2+3x+753571 then u can use the discriminant
Am guessing he hasnt done that tho
Okay!
Thank you guys for the help
Haan bhai wo toh koi bhi karle
Sure!
Sahi baat h
lmao š
what was thisš

This seems valid for a timeout
That was a dare from my friends sorry
They asked to send this
Sorry
what friends are giving you dares in undergraduate math broš
Idk tbh
Editing won't work
Figured
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @charred mantle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I thought the answer is 2 but it's 4... now looking closely, I find 3 asymptotes... 2 vertical and 1 horizontal at y=3... where's the last one?
looks like there's only 3
use cursor to interact with graph
maybe there's one hidden somewhere
i did but can't find it
bruh
Do you think they're counting the one on the left as two for some reason?
Wait @acoustic plaza does the right side also become an asymptote
right side
approaching 3
See thats the thing!
Its approaching y=3,smth for completely seperate parts of the grapg
Shouldnāt you move it to the other side and multiply it by 10?
but I have already counted it once right?
Exactly you can see both are connected
Ahm thats not how it works!
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #āhow-to-get-help for instructions).
how does it work then
you need to count them seperately

See i would tell you how my teachers taught me asymptotes, but i feel like it would be better to read your notes
due to regional differences and notation
why? it's the same thing... it's just that the asymptote is on the other end of the graph
I don't have any notes regarding this
could you teach me how you learned it
just a second
Wait @acoustic plaza just looked at it carefully does the left part also tend to y = 3
Like as is it just the mirror image of the right part?
i suppose so
Sorry mb then!
could you share the link
you can't access it...it's private
@acoustic plaza Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i know that this is obviously true but how do i prove it
like -rigorous- proof
ok
Well what have you done so far
if one of the angles is 90 then product of all cosines would be zero
then u proceed I think
i just took an angle as 90 and applied basic stuff i know to know
but how do i prove it without assuming that an angle will be 90
He has to prove triangle is right angle but he can't write ight that he need proof that triangle is right from equation given
You're proving the opposite directions
wa
gimme a hint
ill try to do it from forward direction
Well you have sin² and cos², there's something you can do immediately
ok just solve the given eq for the cosine squares of A B C which will be equal to 1
It's 10 point question bud š
Convert all in Cos(2x) format I think
yes
i tried converting em all to sines
so i got sum of squares of sines as 2
how is that 10 pts
There written in corner
holy
so u gotta prove the triangle cosine equation
and then prove the thing aswell
so u gotta start with A+B+C = pi
7 actually
8 no?
ok
Good. Now you can use the fact that the angles sum up to 180
Write C as 180-(A+B)
oh ye mb
Now you on right track š«”
C = pi ā(A+B)
And recall how sin works with that
apply cosine
we get cosine squares of A, B C + 2cos a cos b cos c
=1
now the eq u are given
use that for the squares to be equal to 1
so
cos A cos B cos C =0
wait mb , sum of squares of sines is 1
did u solve the given equation just asking
converting everything into cosine and taking it to one side
ok
so u wanna do it in sine
then convert given eq into sine
cos^2 A is 1- sin^2 A
bruh
would be easier to do it in cosines
but yeah
sines
yes
now A+B+C = pi
right
u manipulate it to get sin^2 C
mhmm
u can square both sides
expand sin^2 A+B
sin^2Acos^2B=sin2A(1āsin^2B)
honestly cosine equation would be smaller
sin^2A+sin^2B+sin^2A(1āsin^2B)+(1āsin^2A)sin^2B+2sinAsinBcosAcosB
u get that
2(sin^2A+sin^2B)ā2sin^2Asin^2B+2sinAsinBcosAcosB
then this
is there some other way to prove this
without trig
with vectors
complex numbers
or smm
yes vectors
thank god
yes ik vectors
they expect us to know everything , even mobius inversion and stuff
i hate trig
dont you like vectors
they cool asf
but the cosine part is easier
I do like it
That was a PIE question btw
how do I explain it in discord chat tho
infact ykw
imma try vectors on my own
bruh
idk
Closed by @magic lily
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
sure imma js get back after tinkering with it
ye ik dat
we have this equation
we need to prove AB and AC are perpendicular
so their dot is zero
ok yeah I would still do it with cosines and trig
cuz its easier
if youre still interested in a trig approach then\
$\cos(2A) + \cos(2B) + \cos(2C) = -1$\
$(\cos(2A) + \cos(2B)) + 2\cos^2(C) = 0$
blud
wtf
delete the latex after putting a spoiler
lmao
š¤¦āāļø
Gang wait bro left that chat why we bullying each other
ā Original question: #help-41 message
but this is w
Gang bro came back let bully each other
Bro left the game buddy he alr solved it and went to advance math
Don't let me down buddy š i got high hope from u
Most efficient approach
Since you know one of them is 90
Start from CosACosBCosC = 0
And work backwards
When he know one of them is 90 ?
You need to prove one of them is 90
It's not a holistic approach
But yes
Ye prove so that means he don't know
Yes you can do that in rough work
You don't need to show that you did reverse engineering
thats illegal
He need 10 point ig he need approach
Rough work
Ik gng I've solved this exact paper
Ig i should step in let me open my tresure of notes
The cos(2A)+cos(2B) method is the most efficient
works
got this
Even fxn
Quadrant
alr
Yepp
š«”
isnt 6 js easy
Nawh
use mod
did he get it
Yes mod is to understand the question
ye
How many questions to solve for exam and what time ?
The real solving begins after that
idk man
we just have to prove that 3 distinct pairs exist
cant we just use pigeonhole
But there's an elegant solution
8 questions 2 hrs
Not exactlyy
yes
how did u solve it
I mean php is used
the conclusion is he has to prove cos A. cos B. cos C =0
We 5 ppl solved this question in 45min ā ļø
Considered a tic tac toe board
so ABC is a right angled triangle
we should move somewhere else
It's a 5 mins trick
its discord chat
Yeah
yk what imma summarize a solution
.close
Closed by @magic lily
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Where
oh nvm he got it
Don't leave me alone gang i am also member
he left u alone dang
sent u req
Ye accepted
alr gng
jee aspirant ?
Bro is ....
bruh server filled with indians
@magic lily ok so this is first step
second step is to get sigma cos^2 x on A,B,C = 1
and third step
eq 1 and eq 2 we get cos A cos B cos C =0
hence proved
@fathom mist they went to secret place they not coming back and they left me alone šš«”
they made a gc
to solve einstein's problem
ggs
einstein failed and we wont
wait so yall are in pre university
They really leave me behide šš«”
wth im younger
Just 2 month then I will be in college
?
you doin jee right so prob eng major
Yep oh that was he asking
Then Science major ig?
@turbid hatch you also jee?
yes
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
by fundamental theorem of caculus $F'(x) = f(x)$ so the inequality $F'(x) \geq c F(x)$ and then $F'(x) - c F(x) \geq 0$ holds true
MxRgD
now multiply by the integrating factor e^{-cx} and see what you can find
@stoic valley
Hm did tht
what did you get
I got F(x) >= 0
how did you get that?
Uh e^-cx F(x) is an increasing function
And we know that F(x) = 0
So i simply wrote e^-cx F(x) >= e^-0 F(0)
And therefore e^-cx F(x)>= 0
Like use x = 0
.
$F(0) = \int_{0}^{0} f(t) dt = 0$
MxRgD
i mean this
oh
I got confused
Anyways yeah, try to do the same for g(x)
I'm going to sleep soon so can't help with the rest
You get g(x) < 0
Oh okay tysm tho!!
@stoic valley Has your question been resolved?
Pls ping me if you text anything
<@&286206848099549185>
The question states that $f$ is non-positive, so its integral $F(x) \leq 0$. Therefore, for all $x \geq 0$, we have
$$F(x)=0 \implies f(x)=0.$$
Civil Service Pigeon
anything else relevant in here
Right
This is true for $x>0$.
Civil Service Pigeon
The finish is immediate from this
Yeah and thats whats given in qsn asw
so technically its 1 right?
Not "technically", the answer is 1.
That is at zero itself
mhm
thats wrong
I did all this exaclty same method and logic and results
But answer says its 0
that is there are no roots
Here is an explcit example of f,g that show the answer is 1.
You should've specified that then
eh people forget edge cases all the time
I'd chalk it up to whoever made the answer key being a muppet
I got that after mxrgd helped a little
Thanks tho
I have another
Might be silly again should i still ask?
Eh start a new channel since this one is already kinda messy
Aight ty

.close
Closed by @stoic valley
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok so I got 144, it's apparently 166
what I'm getting here is that I just don't know how to do summation
since p is a prime that isn't odd it's just 2, so x is either 2 or 4 so S is either 104 or 208, so getting the number of positive integers less than both that are coprime is just (104-52-4)+(208-104-8)=48+96=144, which I'm not sure----------
I'm realizing I misread it to coprime
but wait no it's 168 then no?
Did you use totient function anywhere
it was easy enough since the prime factorization iz 2 thingies
no
wait I'm rechecking the question
I don't see where you calculated the totient of 104 or 208
104-52-4=48, it works
and 96 for the other part
yeah why is it 166
it's 166
104-48+208-96=168 I'm not getting where the last 2 disappeared off to
wait 1 is included in bothof these
ah I'm stupid
.close
Closed by @cunning jasper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Four friends, Stacy, Michelle, Peter, and Robert, planned a reunion. They left from four different places: Las Vegas, California, New York, and New Jersey.
It is known that:
Michelle was the first to reach the destination and occupied a round table.
The person from New York arrived second and sat opposite Michelle.
Peter came in third and sat to the immediate left of Stacy.
The person from New Jersey arrived before the person from California.
Where did Stacy come from?
could someone help me verify? the answer i'm getting is New york
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
But yea, Stacy's from NY
Ya don't really need the 4th clue for that
@gritty shard Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to find reciprocal of 7 over 2?
just 2 over 7, unless i'm misunderstanding you
the question says
"write down the reciprocal of 7/2"
idk how to do the fraction command
yeah so the reciprocal of $\frac{\rsq}{\gsq}$ is $\frac{\gsq}{\rsq}$
professional attention seeker
yeh, so follow what's mentioned above
how do i show my work?
no need for additional work
apply that property/definition
and you can jump immediately to the final answer
okay let me check the marking scheme for the answer
for 1 mark, the answer is enough
@zinc gust Has your question been resolved?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help on how to find the domain, horizontal asymptote, and range. :D
@hallow cipher Has your question been resolved?
domain = everywhere except where it doesnt exist (one value which you can solve when you remember you cant divide by 0)
im not sure what range is sorry
horizontal asymptote = limit in infinity
@hallow cipher Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how does this transformation work?
I mean, sure, I can just multiply the bottom one and see that they're equivalent, but is there a law behind how that transformation makes sense?
thats a identity for the difference of cubes
This video derives the formulas for factoring a sum or difference of cubes using long division.
http://mathispower4u.com
check this out
@pastel meteor Has your question been resolved?
why does my intention to understand cubic formula has so many related topics smh
, thank you very much 
.close
Closed by @pastel meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the solutions on the interval 0 ⤠θ < 2Ļ . (Give exact answers) 6 cos(2š) = 6cos^2(š) ā 2
I don't know how to answer this
@carmine kettle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @carmine kettle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is this D and not E?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im struggling a bit with limits, can someone please check my answers on these?
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
my teacher wants answers typed thats why its weird.. not sure why
closed my other one btw
i can tell you a and e are incorrect, but that really is a horrible graph
as for h, it looks like the line goes above 1... so it's hard to say...
same with x->3^-
seems like it's off from 2...
@craggy latch Has your question been resolved?
@waxen oak sorry for the ping but i still need a bit for help for this if you are free
so -1? how does that work if it passes it
where are you getting -1 when looking at x=2
sorry i was looking at -2, theres no negative signs on the graph so i got mixed up
so thats like 0.3?
but then im still consfused since it passes x = 2
@craggy latch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @craggy latch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.help
Commands:
clopen: .close, .reopen
factoids: .tag
help: .help
Type .help <command name> for more info on a command.
.help me
No command called "me" found.
Ay
i need help
@misty igloo first read #āhow-to-get-help
done
Okay, now what do you need help with?
The squash club needs to raise funds for renovations to club buildings. 2 people jason and mark want to help by organizing some local teenagers to sell boxes of chocloate. their goal is to reach 20000. So how many boxes of chocolate bars will they need to sell if 1. each box has 20 choko bars in it 2. each chocko bar sells for 2.50 , it also includes a 12% mark up. 3. the club gets to keep the mark up percentage on each box of chocolates sold. 4 the company for the bars will donate 5 for each box they sell. 5. Calculate the number of boxes of chocolate that the club needs to raise to reach 20000
@atomic needle
what i did was 2.50 x 1.12 = 2.80 then i times it with the 20 making 56, after that i added the 5 dollars with 56 making 61 which is the total for 1 box, after that i did 20000 divided by 61, then it shows 327 boxes
but i dont know if its correct
thats not right at all
For starters 2. refers to each box selling for 2.50
but
i dint say that
i said
each chocolate bar
is 2.50
then what you calculated is the total
but you want the amount raised for the club
most of the money goes to the company
huh
the club only gets 12% of sales + 5 dollars per box sold
ohhh
wait..
does that mean
the club earns 11 dollars
for each box they sell?
????????????