#help-39
1 messages · Page 333 of 1
similar yes
in the "good" case, none of the planes are parallel
what would you expect the intersection to be in that case?
not true
i read that wrong
think geometrically
3
if two planes intersect, what does their intersection look like?
a line
the same line
no, try experimenting with like a pencil and a sheet of paper
wait how is it not just the same line??
-# maybe it might help to clarify weather they all intersect in the same place or diffrent places? 
if it intersects that line, then would the line not be the intersection
well what's the intersection of the z axis and the xy-plane?
a point
yeah, i'm just considering a sort of "standard" case here
there are situations where that doesn't happen
for example, what happens if two of the planes are parallel but not identical?
yea, you can get that case too
the red line is the intersection of all 3 planes
they dont intersect
right
it turns out that there are really only 4 possibilities
for the intersection
none, one, two, or 3
either it's a plane, or a line, or a point, or empty
well there are various ways to proceed, probably the most straightforward is to start by finding out how the first two planes intersect
and then see how that result intersects with the third plane
if you know some linear algebra then you can do this methodically using row reduction, for example
but if not, then just do it however you usually do it
what's the context, is this a linear algebra class?
if so then probably you should do row reduction tbh
uh, idk. Unit is 3D vectors and vector calc
ah ok
just find the intersection of the first two, however you would normally do it
eliminate one of the variables
never hurts to practice the matrix nonsense
yep, if you know how to do it then go for it
it shouldn't be too horrible hopefully, only a 3x3
yea
so ill just do my thingy (probs gonan be at least 5m if I dont get stuck)
and ill get back to u once ive finished
ok
-# ty for the helps (if you do end up leaving b4 i finish)
hmm
for my last row I've got {0 0 0 | 51/4}
idk what to make of it
hmm, can you show your work?
i get this ```
M =
1 -5 2 10
1 7 -2 -6
8 5 1 20
rref(M)
ans =
1.0000 0 0.3333 3.3333
0 1.0000 -0.3333 -1.3333
0 0 0 0
ah bummer
luckily it only affects the last column
so you don't have to recompute everything
hm?
your calculations for the first three columns will still be fine (if you didn't make any mistakes there)
i mean when you change that 1 to 10
ill just go through it again
should be better this time
oh what is this
i got row 2 and row 3 to be {0 1 -1/3 | -4/3}
is that a problem?
no, but it can be simplified further
if rows 2 and 3 are equal then you can subtract row 2 from row 3
kk
oh so row3 should just be 0 0 0 | 0
hmm now the "hard" part imo
getting rid of the numbers in the top right of the matrix
yea can you show what you have so far?
so far so good
yep it matches what i got numerically
yep!
show what you got
well you have one freely varying parameter, lambda
what kind of object is that gonna give you when you let lambda vary over all real numbers?
a line
yep
oh and thats our answer
yeah, depending on what details they want
like do they want a full parameteric equation for the line, or just "a line" as the answer?
btw, this means that you had exactly this sort of situation
ah nice
idk how they get that ima be real
you can get that form by multiplying your equations by 3
and rearranging
(and renaming lambda to t)
vector eq of a line is of the form: p = a + t(AB)
actually theirs isn't the same as yours hmm
oh, it should be the same, nvm
their direction vector is the same as yours
they just used a different anchor point
if you plug in lambda = 1 you get their point (3,-1,1)
so their t is equal to (lambda - 1)
well just taking yours:
multiply everything by 3, you get:
3x = 10 - lambda
3y = -4 + lambda
3z = 3 lambda
mhm
the right hand side in vector form then becomes
(10, -4, 0) + lambda (-1, 1, 3)
so that's one valid parameteric form
any scalar multiple of this also works
you can also replace (10, -4, 0) with any other point on the line
for example (3, -1, 1) as in their answer
ooh ok
but this is valid
yep assuming i didn't make any arithmetic mistakes, check my work 😆
it is 3am here haha
no it looks correct
ok cool
yeah, the usual grunge, pretty much unavoidable with this kind of question
when possible, always double check with software
so easy to make mistakes doing it by hand
yw!
we start vector calc tomorrow, would you recommend pre-reading / solving it?
to get an understanding of it
if you have the time and energy, sure
but being well rested is also good
ive got at least 4h till i sleep
doing at least a skim ahead of time should be useful if you are able to
yeah, fairly straightforward but like in this problem, kinda tedious
definitely useful to get some practice
or i think its parameterization
yep that's what it looks like
these look horrid
definitely gonna be some algebra in some of these
"horrid" describes a lot of multivariable calculus haha
like... idek what t^2 i +t^4 j even looks like
the concepts are fine but the calculations can be disgusting
well if you had x = t^2 and y = t^4 , then x^2 = y
and since x = t^2, x is always >= 0
so it's part of a parabola
yep, the i,j,k is another way of expressing the components of a vector
the vector (x,y,z) is the same as (x)i + (y)j + (z)k as you said
because i is just (1,0,0), j is (0,1,0), k is (0,0,1)
but they'll love to throw both notations at you (and maybe some other ones too)
yw, good luck!
.close
Closed by @wooden flare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@swift spindle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-39 message
I think 13 b can still be simplified further.
Closed by @swift spindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
wait hwat where
At the y=0 line?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the purpose of alpha > beta?
so you can know the sign of an
Does it matter the sign of a_n?
probably not really, but when you give a name to two roots it's better to know which is which
otherwise a_n isn't properly defined
Closed by @brisk steeple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how could there be a solution on (-infity,+infinity) if cotx is not continuous on that intervall
They mean to say that there is a solution y that would technically be defined on IR, but it would of course only work on subintervals, that excludes the poles
I don't see how we can go about finding this solution however, since our method relies both P(x) and Q(x) being cont
All your solutions will be continuous on (0,pi) but there will be one solution that you could extend to a smooth function on IR, that's the point
ok Ill think about how to accomplish that
What is your general solution, first of all?
@royal galleon Has your question been resolved?
\prpl Ok so this rewrites to
[ frac{2b-cos(2x)}{2sin(x)} ]
and you wann figure how to choose $b$ so that essentialy you get rid of the $sin(x)$ in the denominator
hm
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-39 message
ok so we just use cos2x = 1-sin^2x and b = 1/2
yes
<@&268886789983436800>
thank you. Now I understand that we can use b to expand our solutions to certain domains
.solved
Closed by @royal galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
<@&268886789983436800>
Why are you pinging mods
there was a nsfw server link person, nothing important for the current conversation.
Ok
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is the point of all three of these intervals. The solution seems to be the same on all three
P(x) and Q(x) are the same and are continuous on all three of them. This means the method we use to find the solutoin won't change and then we will just have the same solution
hii
@royal galleon Has your question been resolved?
I think each solution would have its own constant though, like they would be independent of each other. You wouldn't have a continuous solution necessarily, if you were to connect the intervals and extend the solution on the connected domain
By constant do you mean initial condition
The constant after integration
but we are integrating from a to x. sure a can be different but wouldn't all the solutoins have a in the same place
You'd have to use a different a, like a1,a2,a3 because on each interval a is forced to take a value that isn't contained in the other intervals
ok so literally the same solution I just rename constants. And what about b? Because we don't know if b will be the same or not
also when looking for a solution I have the integral $\int_a^x \frac{(t-1)(t-3)}{(t-2)^2}dx$ I want to use partial fraction decomposition so we have $(t-1)(t-3) = A(t-2)+B$ . I get A=-1 but that can't be right
BigBen
You'd need to do long division, partial fraction decomposition requires the numerator to be of lower degree than the denominator
Or not necessarily long division, I think if you expand terms, you can split the fraction simply
what about this?
What do you mean by b
well for the we have the condition f(a)=b
b could be the same or it could be different. does it not matter though and we still name it b_1,b_2....
You should name it differently because the condition can be different on each interval
wdym? aren't the conditions just that P(x) and Q(x) need to be continuous. If we are naming the inputs a_1,a_2 and so on woudln't we do the same with the outputs?
I thought you mean IVP by condition?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-39 message
What is Ivp condition?
Initial value problem
For example, from your family of solutions, you wanna choose the one that addictionally satisfies a constraint called IVP that is f(x0)=y0
Yes so that's what I'm saying so each a_n will have a b_n
yes, that was also what I was saying
Closed by @royal galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
intermediate value pearoem
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so im trying to understand whats going on here, correct me if im wrong but basically depending on where the characteristic curve lands, the boundary or initial conditions there determine the solution we use?
<@&268886789983436800>
@wild fable Has your question been resolved?
Bro you solved
It
did you even read my question
Wait I am gonna solve it give me a minute
Exactly! You got it 100% right
If a characteristic curve hits the x-axis it picks up the initial condition g(x). If it hits the t-axisit picks up the boundary condition h(t)
<@&268886789983436800> AI
Because I don’t know good English I translated
I feel like 6 words isn't really a good sample size
The message right after it has AI signs
Yes because I translate my paper it was in Greek
Namely weird unicode characters that ppl cant find on their kbs normally
You see what I say
Ye...
am i being punked
Bro you find it If a characteristic curve hits the x-axis if it touch t axis so x=t^2/2 is boundary condition of h(t) sorry for my bad English
Closed by @wild fable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Search the world's information, including webpages, images, videos and more. Google has many special features to help you find exactly what you're looking for.
.close
Closed by @cobalt torrent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Wouldnt that make it more complicated
But idk, I'm a pre uni too
This is accelerated algebra 2 im in high school
you won't be able to solve it exactly, you can only prove that an unique solution exist
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Thats what im trying to
yeah so could you solve it?
No ive been trying do this for a while bc im self studying so i literally dont know what im even doing im tonna be honest but ive been working with logarithms i guess and one of my friends whos in acc algebra 2 sent me this to practice
that's more calc practice than algebra practice
I can agree because theres 'e' and this looks tuff tbh for me
you need to see left side - right side as a function, so that you're just looking for when a function equals 0
f(x) = 6^(2x-4) - 2^(x+2) - e^(2x+4)
you're trying to prove f(x) = 0 has a unique sol
which will be true if you can for example show that the function is strictly increasing
starts negative and ends up positive
but it will require to do a full study of the function
Is this a troll question in any sense?
Man you need so much stuff for an algebraic expression and shes just learning logs
well for a highschool student, I do expect it to take at least 30 to 45 min ig
unless you find a smart trick to accelerate things and avoid some calculations
I don't see how it's related to algebra 2 more than calc but it's doable if you did highschool calc
Im in 10th grade but im in geometry rn. Im just trying to study algebra 2 and pre calculus on my own so I can test out and take ap calc bc senior year but its also just for fun because i find math interesting despite the fact that im not exactly good at it i want to get better thank you sm for your help
@prime pelican Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You can probably work this out from the theorem itself
If I_(n+1) is inside I_n, what can you conclude about a_n and a_(n+1), say?
unsure
You have two intervals
And one is inside the other
What does that tell you about the relation between the left-sides of those intervals
(draw this out if you're still lost)
-# And for a prototypical example of the theorem at play, I_n = [-1/n, +1/n] is pretty easy to check
how?
You do know how to draw an interval, right?
[------[----]-----]
okay
If those four markers represent
a_n, a_(n+1), b_(n+1), b_n
respectively, what must we conclude about a_n and a_(n+1)?
i.e. how they relate to each other?
But even if you don't want to answer that - and tbh it's not a requirement for understanding the theorem - suppose ALL your intervals were like that
an ----an+1----bn+1-----bn
i.e. they're all nested inside each other
(if you like, you could stack them like a pyramid, then just collapse them all onto the same number line)
unsure
(think "order")
is this mathly correct statement
(If I move at all, that is)
-# what you just said is barely even grammatical
If you go from a_n to a_(n+1), are you going to the right on the number line, or to the left?
right so an is monotone increasing
bn is monotone decreasing .
yes
Okay so imagine this
i am in the learning phase, I am allowed to make mistakes
but, why?
You have a bunch of closed intervals, nested inside each other
That's literally the FIRST requirement
The SECOND requirement is that the leng-
You can see that I'm typing, you do NOT have to ping me.
The SECOND requirement is that the length of these intervals approaches 0
(one way of writing this is the limit-statement as written there)
The theorem then says that the infinite intersection of these intervals does exist (and namely as a singleton)
why lim length = 0
Okay I'm just gonna lay out the rest of this then
if the lengths don't go to zero, you can hardly expect the intersection to consist of a single point, for example you could take I_n = [0,1] for all n
care to elaborate?
We'll have that an is monotonic increasing and similarly bn is monotonic decreasing.
Further, we must have that all the a's are smaller than all the b's.
They must each have limits (say, A and B).
If they were not the same, then (it should be obvious that) the Interval-Limit would be [A, B] which... is still an interval. (why not A > B?)
If they are the same, then say A = B = x, then the infinite intersection of intervals would be...?
Bungo's intervals don't satisfy the second requirement - it should be obvious what the infinite intersection is
@stoic imp Has your question been resolved?
No
i don't follow
Care to elaborate?
No play minecraft instead
Why don't you follow? What's tripping you here?
why do you say lim an converges to A
don't troll in help channels
Because it's a monotone increasing sequence and it's bounded above
Einstein protests this rule
You should recall something from Analysis about this
The <@&268886789983436800> are less likely to
-# Suggestion: either a warning or a mute, at your discretion
if you'd like general conversations you can bring that over to #discussion . please don't do that while someone is trying to learn
can you stop bothering people who are trying to learn?
Einstein should think about why trolling in the help channels gets in the way of people helping/receiving help
also, I get you're trying to help but backseat modding is also against the guidelines
oh shit is it? mb
However we ask not to be rude about it and to avoid “backseat moderation”: making authoritative decisions about whether someone violated the rules and what punishment awaits them.
oh it is in the rules, apologies
But yh @stoic imp this implies that an has a limit
It's the Monotone Convergence Theorem
(This should be in your analysis notes)
(and it's a pretty easy one to remember)
are you sure we need monotone convergence theorem for this? strange
@pastel umbra
You can do it with MCT pretty easily
That said, do your notes there not have a proof of 3.1?
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principio_de_los_intervalos_encajados Heck, even the Spanish Wikipedia article of this uses MCT to prove this pretty fast
-# tf is it with maths articles and embeds
By notes I mean the PDF file that has your lecture notes on them
The screenshots you keep sending
the proof uses this proposition that if an is monotonically bounded then the limit exists or equivalently an converges
But even so, there you go there's already a visual representation of the intervals
...Yh, that's MCT
alr
right
why not A > B?
if A = B we are talking about a singleton
i guess
Yes; that is what the theorem ultimately states
the proof is left as an exercise to the reader
i am the reader and I need help doe
Genuinely you can read the Wiki article I sent, it's there
The paragraph beginning
La prueba de este teorema es una aplicación del teorema de las sucesiones monótonas
i dont see no proof
AHEM
i understand that if lim an = l1 and lim bn = l2
since by hypothesis we have lim an - bn = 0 then l1 = l2
but shit gets fuzzy after that
Find the finite intersection of these intervals up to some K'th interval
That finite intersection will just be that K'th interval
Take limits
Look, take these four intervals, I1 down to I4
Can you see that the intersection of these intervals - i.e. a finite intersection - is just I4, the yellow one?
but I want to use logic and math to prove it dawg
Bruh this is basic logic
The yellow bit is inside ALL the other intervals
So it MUST be definitionally inside the intersection
Similarly if you pick a point not inside the yellow interval, it's not in the intersection; so the intersection must be inside the yellow interval
But if A \subseteq B and B \subseteq A, then double inclusion implies A = B
End of proof
yeah i need to add this proof to my notes
y finito
Okay, you're making progress - genuinely I want you to give proof writing like this more of a shot
yk the status thing here
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
This thing
A lot of the time you've been on step 1, and you wanna make sure you can get at least onto step 2 more frequently 
say lim an = l1 and lim bn = l2
then by the hypothesis of the theorem we know
lim bn - an = 0 and so l1 = l2 = x for some x
then since mct tell us that lim an = sup(an) if an is bounded above and increasing sequence, we get that x = sup(an) = inf(bn)
so x >= an, and x <= bn forall n in N
so x in [an, bn] so x in In forall n in N
so x in the big intersection of In forall n in N
wtf does this proof though?
that x is in the intersection of all the intervals In
then we proof is the only one
okay I get it completely now
shit is tough tho, ngl
i need to fix my notes tho
ty for the help dawg
Ultimately, this is a skill you need to learn, because that's what differentiates high school from university
You're not gonna get far without it
-# and without all the high school knowledge too, you still need that as well
.close
Closed by @stoic imp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am finding the Cartesian relation for r(t). But idk why my answer is wrong and also, how is the correct answer x= 1/4 (5-y^2) i don’t see how we get that as an answer
$(5-y)^2$ is not $5-y^2$
Civil Service Pigeon
People make mistakes.
Ah was it a typo in the solutions
Ok yea that makes sense then, but why is my approach wrong
$$y=5-2\sqrt{x} \implies 2\sqrt{x}=5-y \implies \sqrt{x}=\frac{5-y}{2} \implies x=\left(\frac{5-y}{2}\right)^2=\frac{1}{4}(5-y)^2$$
Civil Service Pigeon
I'm not following
Oh so it is fine like this then
Well, a pm would make it a bit better
But it’s fine to either be in y= (…) or x = (…) then
well yes ofc
a valid equation is a valid equation
Closed by @wooden flare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-39 message
Got another Q gimme 2 secs to type it out
Why do both of these give me the correct “shape” but wrong domain
And how do I find the correct domain for these
.close
Closed by @wooden flare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm completely stumped on the differential equation $(x-y)y'=x+y$
greaterthan.333
I don't really see how I can get it into f(y/x) form
divide both sides by x
Closed by @rain vessel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yllll
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
n = (tan a + tan x) / (tan a - tan x) . (1 + tan a tan b) / (1 - tan a tan b)
Anyone may use LeXit to make it easier to understand
Well
Tan(a+b)/tan(a-b)=n
And convert tan into sin/cos
Now try it
@rich portal
Did u do it
Closed by @rich portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I would try simplifying sin(A+B+C)
Sin(A+B+C)=1
Sin((A+B)C)
Sin(A+B)cosC+cos(a+b)sinC
sinAcosBcosC+cosAsinBcosC+cosA.cosBsinC-sinAsinBsinC
looks good!
I actually don't know if that was the right path to take or how to proceed
Ohh
Yeah but couldn't see any path
okay, let's start over, i dont think using sin(A+B+C) is going to be helpful here
lets work from the original expression, recall that sin^2(A) can be written in terms of cos(2A)
right now, my motivation is to convert the first two terms sin^2(A) and sin^2(B) into forms of cos(2A) and cos(2B) respectively
i will leave sin^2(C) untouched because i want to only use the sum to product indetity purely on cos(2A) and cos(2B)
in doing so, i will get an expression somewhat resembling the form of (A+B) and what not, which i can use the idea that A+B = pi/2 - C
hope this provides more help
awww
Why is this guy awing
because my idea sucked
happens to the best of us.
nono happens to the best of us
!topic
Please read the channel description before posting, and stay on topic.
-# sniped
Another idea would be to take the cosine of A+B+C and then maybe that could help eliminate something in here
well there is the sinAsinBsinC term
which is present
and then after the possible elimination maybe you can take a square
but I kind of need to take a nap so I might just check in later if you all got it solved
idea:
I guess same solution available over gemini
the expression is symmetric so you could differentiate with respect to A and show that it equals zero
then use this
oh yeah after setting C = pi/2 - A - B and keeping A and B free of course
feels like at that point you would just need to bash with sum formulas
because everything is the same degree i think
Closed by @thin root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, i am going and i made certain equations but i cant proceed further
it is like i use, x+y= ab and i finally get x-y=8 which is already given.
ab?
it was an example, i prefer u provide the path
<@&286206848099549185>
Can you see how the side of length x can be divided into 2 line segments
after that?
Call the length of the longer line segment a, so the other one is x-a
okay then
We see the triangle circumscribing the circle has sides a, x-a and hypotenuse y
yes
now?
<@&286206848099549185>
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
@lofty storm
im here
so all of this is a square
yes
prob you didn't use a + b = x
i did a lot of stuff but, it just throws me back to x-y=8
i did
and hence i get, x+y= ab/4
nobody helped... i figured it out myself, thats helps even more fr.
.close
Closed by @lofty storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I proceed
All you have left to do is sub in the x value they gave you
You're pretty much done
@midnight haven Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i tried that approach
but that gives me y's to deal with
and thats not the form the equation is supposed to be
@icy hornet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@icy hornet have you tried substituting the equation of the line
into the distance formula
to get rid of y
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
can i then substitute p as x for the equation
so
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm wondering if I answered this question algebraically correct. What the questions wants me to find out is the "center angle" of a circle sector.
- The radius is 7 cm
- the area is 33cm^2
- the formula I used is at the very top of the calculation
no, as from the second step to the third you should multiply both sides by 360
so you would get 33 * 360 = v * pi * 49
and then from the third step to the fourth step similarly you should divide both sides by 49pi
Closed by @fallen marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve this?
why do have a -sign multiplied to your 1/2
im not rlly sure did this a long time ago haha
just reviewing now and have no clue
look up ftc
in simple cases like these
where the upper bound is x
and the lower bound is a constant
simply replace the t(s) in your integrand with x
@gritty citrus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if their traces are the same
A and B are similar if B = P^{-1} AP
tr(B) = tr(P^{-1} AP) = tr(P^{-1} A) + tr(P) = tr(AP^{-1}) + tr(P) = tr(AP^{-1}P) = tr(A)
did you read my proof ?
if you want you can reduce the matrices, but they are already diagonal
They are similar. They are both diagonalizations of some other matrix, where we chose a different order for the eigenvalues.
P =
0 0 1
0 1 0
1 0 0
@peak iris
@peak iris Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How else can I further set up this problem?
I initially wanted to say that the amplitude of the current is the amplitude of E(t) = 120sin(12t), but this does not yield the right answer. Why is this the case?
Alternatively, do I just try replacing q' with E(t) because current is dQ/dt (as if it's a given), find q, take its derivative to get current, and find the amplitude of q'?
Or do I just set q' = E(t), and solve for the amplitude of q(t)?
(Ordinary Differential Equations)
The current differential equation comes from Kirchhoff's Junction Law (the sum of the voltages around a circuit is 0).
.close
Closed by @mint scarab
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So, my thoughts...
Probability = No. of successful outcomes / No. of all outcomes
= Ways to choose 3 cards out of (52 cards - 1 ace of spades - 1 king of spades) / Ways to choose 5 cards out of 52 cards
= 50C3/52C5
Is this the correct method?
Follow up question:
Yes that looks good
What assumptions does the binomial distribution make?
This should be in your textbook, but is definitely on Wikipedia
My thoughts:
- Binomial distribution requires that each trial has the same probability
- I suppose if you draw one card, then another, the probability changes
One of the assumptions is that the trials (that would be, a draw) are independent
And yeah, each the same probability
They're not independent so yeah, binomial isn't useful here
(Drawing a favorable card reduces the probability of another favorable card)
But if you group each drawing of 5 cards into one trial, each trial has the probability 50C3/52C5, right?
Then, all the trials become independent.
Well, yes, and yes this would be binomial
But a binomial with only one trial isn't exactly what they mean lol
I'm just wondering what they meant by "how could you change the scenario to fit a binomial distribution"
With replacement, is that what they want? Hmm
That's exactly it. Once you throw replacement in, this becomes binomial
Worth looking up is the hypergeometric distribution, which is useful for things like drawing from a pile
That's great, thank you!
Just out of curiosity, why is it unorthodox to lump everything into 1 trial, and then use binomial distribution? It would fit the criteria, right?
(Or you just use another distribution)
The problem is that you'd just get p chance of success and 1-p chance of failure
You don't need to use a binomial model to get that info, you knew that already
Could you? Yes.
Will you ever? No.
Understood. Thank you very much! 
Np! Feel free to ask if you have anything else
Closed by @stable badge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! Could someone please help me with this math problem please? "Betty goes to the store to get flour and sugar. The amount of flour she buys, in pounds, is at least 6 pounds more than half the amount of sugar, and is no more than twice the amount of sugar. Find the least number of pounds of sugar that Betty could buy." I have tried writing an inequality to be able to solve that, but any of the inequalities I tried to write made sense lol.
@unborn lotus Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
What inequalities have you come up with?
s= sugar f= flour 2s<f6>s/2
not quite. So 1. at least 6 more pounds of flour so $s/2 +6 \leq f$ and no more that twice the sugar so $f \leq 2s$
glittersparkles
so $s/2 + 6 \leq f \leq 2s$
glittersparkles
Closed by @unborn lotus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to prove: Suppose M is a module with a(n) composition series; 0<N_1<N_2....N_{n-1}<N_n=M. Show that M has ACC and DCC (IE is Noetherian and Artinian) - I tried looking this up and the proofs all include some reference to Jordan-Holder, which was not covered in my class and thus not allowed. My attempts so far have been induction. The base case is obvious - (N is simple) and the inductive step looks promising, but I cannot garuentee any member of my chain is even related to any of the N_i's - so I'm stuck.
In abstract algebra, a composition series provides a way to break up an algebraic structure, such as a group or a module, into simple pieces. The need for considering composition series in the context of modules arises from the fact that many naturally occurring modules are not semisimple, hence cannot be decomposed into a direct sum of simple m...
@short grove Has your question been resolved?
no
I'm stepping out for a moment to walk my god.
@short grove Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so im stuck on a quadratic equation. i currently have -9 +- Squareroot of 9^2-4(2)(8) divided by 2(2) I got 17 under the square root but i dont know where to go from there
keep it at sqrt17
gotcha but im confused as to what to do next
i am left with -9 + Sqrt17 Divided by 4 and -9 - sqrt17 divided by 4
i dont think i can add or subtract 9 to 17 since 17 is under the square root symbol
correct, you cannot
it doesn't need to be simplified further from there
unless you want to put it into a calculator and get a decimal approximation
that would be nice but the answer sheet says -5/2 , -2 so there is a method but im just super confused
i'm not sure the entire question
(2s+7)(s+1)=-3
your numbers are wrong
probably lol
your c value to be specific
Closed by @empty canopy
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
don't forget you have an equation equal to -3 and you need it equal to zero in order to use the quadratic formula
yea thanks mate
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
can anyone help to solve this
@stuck junco Has your question been resolved?
@stuck junco Has your question been resolved?
@stuck junco Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stuck junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me
<@&286206848099549185>
@idle lintel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have to calculate the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of a matrix
@languid phoenix Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Closed by @languid phoenix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yea?
this is gonna suck but let's compute the eigenstuff of a 3x3
it's just tedious that's why noone answered prob
do you know how to do it?
i mean where to start with computing eigenvalues?
yep!
ok so far we do det of this:
| a - l | b | b |
| b | a-l | b |
| b | b | a-l |
ok good lemme catch up then haha
its (a-l)^3-3b^2(a-l)+2b^2
but, after that, im stuck
first year of college here in romania, we are going crazy with maths
and im kinda behind since we didnt really do this stuff in highschool
cool, no worries!
ok i have the det
(a-l)^3 - 3b^2(a-l) + 2b^3
i think you didn't get the b^3
i did
oh you had it earler but then wrote it wrong in the end
yeah
i assume we have to solve this by hand?
prob rely on this being a depressed cubic
or maybe we try to factor, but i don't see anything obvious
tried to factor
yeah same lol
currently trying to use this
http://www.sosmath.com/algebra/factor/fac11/fac11.html
nope, doesnt work
what do you mean?
cant factor
oh yeah for sure
i haven't pulled out sage, but that's a last resort
and i have to send it at :30...
almost done tho! this is the hardest part
ive waited 2 hours for an answer but nobody would help
yeah
we want an s and t where
3st = -3b^2 and t^3 - s^3 = 2b^3
one solution will be s - t
the "real" solution
the other two are complex
i think s = -b and t = b work
yeah
so the real solution u = s - t is a - l = -2b so lambda is a + 2b 😄
and u have another solution l1=l2=a-b?
so we'd have to divide our determinant expression to compute the other two but i'm pretty sure they would be complex
we can look though
ive got half of the answers xd
do you know synthetic division?
thanks a lot for helping, man
hey of course
yeah, i did the other part
oh nice!
Closed by @languid phoenix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
just the notation?
yeah
i think it's a shorthand of writing a big matrix
ok
and how
at 4.2.6
and how do you reach the final form
it is already solved
im just asking
i have to explain it in front of the class
so, thats a shorthand of writing a big matrix
but how do the transformations work
u have to show
b a ```
when a and b are 2 matrix
are equal to the multiplication of the polynom of (A+B) and (A-B)
ok lemme label these haha
ill wait, thanks
- given
det ... - shorthand (B is never on the diagonal so no need to subtract lambdas)
- using gaussian elimination / row reduction, substitute
row1withrow1 - row2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_elimination - not sure yet lol
- definition of determinant
- using some characteristic equation function
kinda stuck on 4, but i'll post this so you can take a look
for 4, pretty sure its another gaussian move but kinda hidden since we're abstracted away with matrices of matrices
actually looking at step 3 again, i think it's not quite so simple as subtraction, unless there's a typo with double negative on the identity matrix part
@languid phoenix Has your question been resolved?
no, not yet bot
is C in M_n(C) here referring to the complex numbers?
yeah steps 3 and 4 i'm pretty stuck
very non-obvious...
my first thought was row-reduction but it doesn't seem like that's the case
there's no relations between A and B, right?
looking at this atm: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinant#Block_matrices
also thinking there might be some diagonalization involved?
hmm actually no diag 🤦
i think i've run out of progress on this problem...
i'd definitely talk to your professor to see how that step is done
if you do or you figure it out you should lemme know haha
sorry i couldn't be more help 😅
@languid phoenix Has your question been resolved?
I found the thing
it's -row2+row1
and c1+c2
thanks a lot
sorry
i was presenting the homework
thanks a lot man
Closed by @languid phoenix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(I asked this earlier, but I'm still a little confused)
how does one integrate $$\qty(arctan(x-9.5) + 3.70)^2$$
$$ = \int arctan^2(x-9.5) + 7.40 \cdot \int arctan(x-9.5) + \int 3.70^2 dx$$
amy.ames.aims
So to integrate the integral with the arctan^2 it would be an integration by parts
does this mean u would be arctan^2(x-9.5) or arctan^2(x)?
@wheat trail Has your question been resolved?
@wheat trail Has your question been resolved?
The first one. Why would it be the second one?
would u mind showing me how the arctan^2 integration is done; I'm entirely unsure as to how i should approach this
$$\text{le u = } arctan^2(x - 9.5)$$
$$du = \frac{2arctan^2(x-9.5)}{(x-9.5)^2 + 1}$$
$$v = x$$
$$dv = dx$$
$$\int^{4.20}_0 arctan^2(x-9.5) dx = u \cdot v - du \cdot v dx$$
amy.ames.aims
$$= x \cdot arctan^2(x-9.5) - \int^{4.20}_0 \frac{2x \cdot arctan^2(x-9.5)}{(x-9.5)^2 + 1} dx$$
