#help-39
1 messages · Page 319 of 1
OH MAN ITS SO EASY
Do you know the formula for making quadratic equations?
It is k(x^2 -(Sum of roots)x + (Product of roots)
1/4 is alpha and -1 is the beta bec they are two are the zeroes of the polynomial alpha + beta = 1/4 +(-1) = 1/4-1=1/4-4/4 = -3/4 alphabeta= 1/4-1 = -1/4 = x2 -(-3/4x)+(-1/4)= x2 +3x-1
this is my work
but
textbook's answer is
So add and multiply the two roots
wait let me find the answer for that
ok
y=(4x-1)(x+1) is a polynomial with zeroes at x=1/4 and -1
4(-1)^2 - (-1) - 4 = 1 so that can't be right
4x^2 + 3x - 1 is what i am getting
so textbook and that website is wrong
same
yeah me to
thats wht i also got
this is correct
Does the book show how to get that answer?
there is no steps just the direct answer
did you use the polynomial formula for forming poly out of roots?
If u expand (4x-1)(x+1)
i think i didn't
can u show
If you like used that you have take the LCM of it too so you will get 4x ^ 2
How'd you go fromx^2+(3/4)x -1/4 to x^2+3x-1 in the last line
just common out the 4
it is the fractions
You didnt factor out the one infront of x^2 tho?
there is no 4 on the x squared term though
Why
noo
in x^2 + 3/4x - 1/4
hmm ye
common out 4
Do u mean multiply by 4
so it will become like x^2+3-1
ye
Then you also need to multiply x^2 by 4 = 4x^2
why?
Because otherwise it isn’t equivalent
say the reason
Let’s say x+5=0
2x+10=0
Then x must be -5 and it solves both equations (because they are the same equation multiplied by 2)
4(x^2+4/3-1/3)
For example
now i understand
i didn;'t done x^2 multiply
i only did
-3/5
.
not -3/
3/4
-1/4
Yeah when u multiply u have to do all terms
hmm yee
but
i have one doubt
if we mutliply by 4
how 4 got cancel out
ohh
i understood
bec lcm of that fraction is 4
so we need to multiply by 4 to cancel out 4
okk
thx everyone
Like 3/4 times 4 = 12/4 =3
U can either cancel the 4, or multiply then simplify and the result is the same
3x4/4 =3x1=3
And bc 3x4=12, 12/4=3 also
Man I think we have to LCM it then you will get 4x ^2
Real
Yep
i already said that
btw thx
oh ok
Closed by @tribal bloom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Are you a 10th grader?
✅ Original question: #help-39 message
Ohh same
in may 15
i got low marks in maths
i need to fix that
so i am full focused on maths
Yeah for outside delhi it was tough but in delhi it was very very very easy
maaths?
no
hi folks, might wanna take the conversation to a discussion channel?
percentage?
come in dm
!done please
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @tribal bloom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Regarding 1. I tried his test case for 2 and I don't see how my answer is equivalent to what he has. What did I do wrong?
Ok so am just multiplying the denominator by u^2
Alright first for the f(1/x) let t = 1/u and solve from there
you should get integral of 1 to x of ln(1/u) /(1/u + 1)) * -1/u^2 du
multiply out we get integral 1 to x of ln(u) / (u + u^2) du
now combinte integrals
we get (t+1) ln(t) / ((t+1) * t ) dt
cancel the t+1
we get integral of 1 to x of ln(t)/t dt
now substitute u = ln(t)
we get as final answer 1/2 ln(x)^2
I'm not following your combination. We have $\int_1^x \frac{lnu}{u(u+1)}+\frac{lnu}{u+1} du$
BigBen
Yes, for the right integrand, multiply top and bottom by u
Oh wait
combine
Yes
Yes I see
If we make this sub we have ln (ln(t)) then
No?
How? We have lnu. If we set u =lnt we just have ln(ln(t))
Im sorry, you're working with u instead of t, you should do t = ln(u)
I was using t
Closed by @royal galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this the correct formula for Champnowne's constant
@chrome mango Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @chrome mango
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
can someone explain the marking key here? im really confused
ty
<@&286206848099549185>
Closed by @supple sky
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Regarding 7c we have $f(x)= 2f(x)f'(x) \implies \frac{1}{2}= f'(x)$ if I just use an indefinite integral I have $1/4x^2+c$ or if I integrate from 0 to x we have $1/4x^2$. I don't see how I can obtain the -1
BigBen
NVM I see we have the 1/2x + c integrate that from 0 to x and we see that c=-1
I found two solutions for c
Are you saying c can be 1 or -1 depending on what x is
This is not depending on x, there are two functions that solve that equation.
One with c=1 and one with c=-1
If you plug in f(x) = 1/2 x + c, the equation is: 1/4 x^2 + cx = 1/4 x^2 + cx + c^2 - 1 <=> c^2 = 1
What prompted you to have c^2-1
f^2(x) -1 = (1/2 x + c)^2 -1 = 1/4 x^2 + cx + c^2 - 1 on the right side of the equation
Closed by @royal galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im unsure about the answer for c
On one hand the minimum point occurs at 2 so I agree
But I thought the probability of any given value in a pdf = 0
@acoustic tangle Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
uh what
nvm
Do you know which it is?
on second thought i am not familiar with this topic
@acoustic tangle Has your question been resolved?
@acoustic tangle Has your question been resolved?
The probability of $X$ taking any exact value is $0$ for a continuous distribution. However, the probability distribution function $f$ represents the \textit{relative likelihood} of a variable falling \textit{near} a particular point. Since $f$ is minimized at $x=2$, its density increases as you move toward the boundaries ($x=0$ and $x=4$). Hence, $X$ is more likely to be found within a small interval centered far from $2$ than in an interval of the same width centered near $2$.
Civil Service Pigeon
Thank you so much

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
I have another statistics problem I’m a bit confused with
!da2a
Asking the actual question right away is more likely to get responses.
Asking "Can I ask...?" or "Does anyone know about...?" doesn't give people enough information to decide whether they can help, and answering can feel like a promise to help with the actual question, which they might find themselves unable to.
Doesn’t the expected mean differ for routes A and B?
So if you use a rank sum of 216 with a mean of 180, your z-score calculation is wrong
Why?
Oh
I don’t fully understand sorry
Recall that the expected mean of a rank sum depends on the number of items in that group
Specifically $E(R)=\frac{n(N+1)}{2}$
Civil Service Pigeon
Routes A and B have different numbers of journeys, so their “fair” average sums differ
So when you used the rank sum for route A but the mean for route B, you were comparing the data to the wrong baseline
Thus making your z-score calculation invalid
@acoustic tangle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help!
what specifically about the 8.9 is causing issues for you
Have you got to 2*8.9 through commutative property?
If so, multiply 8.9 by ten to get 2*89 and then divide by 10 after you've solved it.
@harsh folio Has your question been resolved?
No
have you learned about decimal numbers yet?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I wanted to understand linear operator is one-one
T(w)=0 =>w=0
W=0 how does it probe it is one-one
This specifically means that the kernel of your linear operator is just {0}.
If T(x)=T(y) what can you say about T(x)-T(y)?
T(x-y)=0
if we take any two different functions....their difference maps to zero function
How does we say it is one-one
not the same person and idk this well but I think it's ≈
that one
or ~
@rustic gale Has your question been resolved?
You mean why (Tv = 0 ⟹ v = 0) implies T is 1-1
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help on these 2 dont know where to atart
Context?
i remember vaguely about swapping x for y then trying to make x the subject
ive just solved c idk about the other 1
i need help on B
is fg supposed to be f(g(1)) or (f ○ g)(1)
that's the same
it just says fg(1)
i think
on the question paper
Its the same thing im p sure
Yeah thats for inverting
So lets start with c since you already have some idea on how it works
ive finished C
wouldnt that be 5-3x1 which is just 2
Youre right on the money
So now
You take that 2, and chug it in f
So try to evaluate f(2)
And that's it!
so 12/3 which is 4
Good job :D
oh yay thanks for the help lex i might be back with more questions later
Aighty just open up a new help channel when the time comes
For now you can just close this one I suppose
Closed by @summer urchin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I start this? I have no idea to do this...
Can you check if v1 and v2 are linearly independent
Using Gaussian elimination?
I mean sort of, you can check if v1=kv2 is a multiple
which would lead to a system
but i think you don't need gauss
Because I just start linear algebra introduction in complex vectors and forgot the concepts of linearly vectors
ah yes let me check
You will get three equations of k and so you can solve one for k and try to see if the others satisfy it
notice that k1, k2 and k3 are all k
you dont have different k's it's a scalar not vector
but yeah you noticed they aren't the same
how would i do this?
if you really feel motivated you can also use gram-schmidt
Is no 6 wrong cuz y’s the sides a fraction
Can I do another way by making a matrix and check for determinants?
cross product is the easiest
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
using v3 = v1xv2
wdym using
yes
I learned these from year 11 and now i forgot all of them, what a shame 
a general approach would be to take the matrix (v1, v2, e1, e2, e3) (or any other basis instead of (e1,e2,e3)) and row reduce that. then take pivot columns
of course three dimensions as usual are easier

or you could take the matrix A with the two rows conj(v1) and conj(v2) and solve Ax=0
to see if there exists row of zeros?
cant happen because the matrix has rank 3
because the last three columns are independent
right, so if there are 4 or more we use matrix instead?
basically
most of linear algebra consists of somehow reducing a question to solving a linear system
which means linear algebra loves gauss
Closed by @sterile python
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this valid
Uh I am confused
You state that there is no max or min
But then chose max is 1 and min is 0
Or am I misunderstanding
i chose option A and the correct option according to it is D
Oh
That wasn't your explanation
I am still confused though
Do you not understand the explanation?
Because, yes it is correct
doesnt a maximum exist on 1-something
ok nvm
we only take it
if 1 is included
.close
Closed by @shadow elm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
If 1 was included in the interval, it would be the max
But since it's not
You can't find the max
Since if you say 0.99
What about 0.995
Or 0.99998
Right
yeah right
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $ABC$ be a scalene triangle, let $H$ be it's orthocenter and let $D$ be the foot of the altitude drawn from $A$. Let $S,T$ be points on the circumcircle of $ABC$ such that $BSH$ and $CTH$ are right angles. $\$
Prove that if $AH = 2HD$, then $D,S,T$ are colinear.
Copter
Ig, very clearly S is the intersection of (BDH) and (ABC) and similarly for T
but i dont know what to do with the length restriction because it doesnt seem relavent at all
@north talon Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Omg finally someone asks about geo, i've been waiting for this
Same, lol.
i do have the solution key but i do not wanna look at it and it seems messy
Just read the question, haven't solved this but i feel like ||Euler line being parallel to BC|| might be important
whys that true -w-
ive reflected H across BC which seems promising
Think about the centroid
oh, same ratio?
Do you know inversion?
i know what it is but idk how to use it
Well it would solve this problem
.-.
Let M, N be the midpoints of AB, AC. Can you prove that AMHN is cyclic?
The sol with inversion is so nice, i think it's worth learning inversion just for this 
I am trying to find a sol without inversion for you though
im thinking of smth interesting
Let X be the midpoint of BH, and Y be the midpoint of HC
both are the center of the circumcircle
Yes
BS is a shared chord so OX is the perpendicular bisector of BS
hence OX parallel to HS
Correct
it suffices to show <BDS = <TDC
by angle chasing <BDC = <BHS = <OXH, and <TDC = OYH
so we need to show <OXH = <OYH <=> O,X,Y,H are cyclic?
Yeah that's fine too
I had another way right here. Note that M,H,T are colinear and so are S, H, N.
But yours work too
Finish the angle chase
hmmmm
Use the pairs of parallel lines you found
Btw I hope you will see the inversion sol afterwards, it's so beautiful
Inversion at H with power HA.HD (directed lengths) turn the problem into this, which is very simple angle chasing
i dont really get directed lengths
Like the segments have direction
hmmm
i thought of a sol with homothety instead lmao
For example you probably know that HA.HD=HB.HE
But if I ask you to construct a point X on HB such that HB.HX=HA.HD there would be 2 options
Which are G and E here
But if i say HB.HX=HA.HD (directed lengths) then E would be the only option
reflect H across BC so AH' is twice AH, well known that ABH'C cyclic
Because HA and HD have opposite directions, so must be HB and HX, which means in that case X ≡ E
Yeah that's how you do it
HN // H'C
what would the inversion look like
i actually have learnt it a bit and i didnt get any of it
You get this?
So the inversion at H with power HA.HD (directed lengths) swap B and E
yo what the freak
i do not get this 😭
The image of B through the inversion at H power HA.HD (directed lengths, i will stop specifying from now on) is the point X on HB so that HB.HX=HA.HD
um do you know what inversion is
i do, i just suck at it
Directed lengths is needed because normal segment lengths would give 2 solutions, E and G (in this pic), that's what directed lengths are for
So that inversion swaps A and D (obviously), swaps B and E, C and F
So (ABC) becomes (DEF), aka the Euler circle
(BFD) becomes the line AEC
oh shit
S is on both (ABC) and (BFD) so its image is the intersection of Euler circle and AEC, which is just N, the midpoint of AC
Similarly T swaps with M
i see i see
S, D, T being collinear is equivalent to their images (N, A, M correspondingly) being on a circle with the center of inversion (H in this case)
So inversion turns the whole problem into proving AMHN is cyclic, which is just angle chasing (as you figured it out)
T-T
Don't worry, i've been through this feeling
Take your time to understand it, please tell me if some parts were confusing
contest is in a month, can he lock in in time ⁉️
i will look into inversion, thanks
Out of curiosity, what contest are you taking? Also good luck on that
im one of the respresentatives to take the national olympiad twt
So it's the national MO?
That's quite early, mine doesn't start until late December
Best of luck to you
We should be friends :3
they need the national oly to be done before qualifiers which is at the end of august lol
sure!
Type .close once you're done reading btw ^^
ok
you were able to spot this cause well known, im guessing?
Yeah you develop an instinct for it. This was the first thing i tried when i saw the question
Closed by @north talon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help verifying my answer for this question: Prove that $\lim_{x\to a} \sqrt x = \sqrt a$ if a > 0 and for x and a in $\mathbb{R}$
Toaster
Do you know what does limit mean
yeah
Ok, so here's my answer:
$\lim_{x\to a} \sqrt x = \sqrt a $ then there's $0<|x-a|<\delta \Rightarrow |\sqrt(x)-\sqrt(a)|<\epsilon$ \ Look at $|\sqrt x -\sqrt a |$. $|\sqrt x -\sqrt a | = \frac{|x-a|}{\sqrt x +\sqrt a }$ \ If $|x-a|<1 \Rightarrow -1<x-a<1 \Rightarrow a-1<x<1+a \Rightarrow \sqrt {a-1} <\sqrt x <\sqrt {1+a} \Rightarrow \sqrt {a-1} +\sqrt {a} <\sqrt {x} +\sqrt {a} <\sqrt {a+1} +\sqrt a $ \ Look at $\frac{|x-a|}{\sqrt x+\sqrt{a}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt x + \sqrt a}|x-a|<\epsilon$ \ We can find a C>0 s.t $|x-a|<C \ \Rightarrow \frac{1}{\sqrt x + \sqrt a}|x-a|<C|x-a| \text{ and we are assuming } x and a \in \mathbb{R}$ so $x>0$ and $a>0$ (otherwise x and a would be undefined). \ So we can have $C = \frac{1}{\sqrt{a-1}+\sqrt(a)}$ (since $\frac{1}{\sqrt x + \sqrt a} < \frac{1}{\sqrt{a-1} + \sqrt a}$) so let $\delta = \min{1, \epsilon(\sqrt{a-1}+\sqrt a )}$ then since $\frac{1}{\sqrt x + \sqrt a}< \frac{1}{\sqrt{a-1}+\sqrt{a}}$ and $|x-a|<\epsilon(\sqrt{a-1}+ \sqrt a)$ then $\frac{|x-a|}{\sqrt x + \sqrt a} < \frac{1}{\sqrt{a-1}+\sqrt{a}}\epsilon(\sqrt{a-1}+ \sqrt a) = \epsilon $
Toaster
what if a is less than 1
and btw you dont need to include the whole process of finding delta in your proof. You can just let delta = [whatever you find] and then prove that this delta works
Oh ok
Yeah, that's why mine is just a partial answer
Shouldn't it be for x>0?
Oh yeah, that too
But it wouldn't be in R if it was < 0
You said x in R, never said anything about sqrt(x)
you can't say x in R because x is not a variable here lol
mb
there is a much easier lower bound on sqrt(x) + sqrt(a) btw
$\lim_{x\to a}\sqrt{x}$ is either a number in $\bR$ or it doesn't exist
frosst
what
it's like saying $\int_{0}^1f(x),dx$ for some $x\in \bR$
frosst
it similary doesn't make sense because the x is not an actual variable it's a dummy variable
x is just there to denote any real number > 0 right?
well in your question you dont really need to say where the x is from
you just need a in R
Wait what's the easier lower bound?
how would you put a lower bound on sqrt(x) + sqrt(3)
fisrt thing that comes to your mind
my first thought was x + 3
you need sth that doesnt depend on x
ideally
0 actually doesnt work
okay but you can't put 0 in the denominator >.>
and its not like sqrt(x) + sqrt(3) can ever be 0, thats quite bad lower bound
you can do a bit better
what's the next best thing that you could actually put in the denominator
sqrt(3)
and in general?
my brain is not braining today sorry
sqrt(a)
yeah
Wait but if you take the reciprocal wouldn't the inequality sign flip?
Yeah
you need an upper bound of the fraction and hence a lower bound of the denominator
oh wait yeah, so $\delta = \min{(1, \epsilon(\sqrt a))}$?
Toaster
well, you dont need the 1 anymore
oh
you can just pick delta = epsilon sqrt(a)
yep, once you verify that it works, you're done 
you just need to check that whenever |x-a| < delta, |sqrt(x) - sqrt(a)| < eps
since $\frac{|x-a|}{\sqrt x + \sqrt a} < \epsilon$ and since $|\sqrt x - \sqrt a| = \frac{|x-a|}{\sqrt x + \sqrt a}$ we good here 🙂
Toaster
You know, I hate it when the emoticons turn into emojis
$\text{:)}$
Toaster
(:
Closed by @hearty flume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How is the empty set {} contained in every set?
the empty set is literally nothingness
everything has nothingness
wait
the empty set {} is a subset of every set, that means that every element in the empty set is contained in every set, since there is no elements
is vacously true
ah
So, does the set A = {1, 2} contain the set {}? So A ∈ {}?
no
My teacher said: NO!!!!!!!?????!?!?? (jk)
You just contradicted what you said earlier.
the empty set clearly is not an element of this set, however it is a subset of this set
stop the cap @stoic imp
I am not joking
Let's use careful terminology here.
X is a subset of Y, denoted X ⊆ Y if every element in X is also in Y.
No matter what Y is, {} is a subset of Y, because every element of {} can be found in Y.
since the empty set doesnt contain any elements, I can say whatever I want about his elements
You might say it's weird to make a statement about "every element of {}". There are none!
Are the elements the entities stated explicitly while writing a set using the Roster method?
A = {1,2} is defining a set called "A", and that set contains elements "1" and "2"
I'm sorry to interrupt the debate about subsets here with my random question 😭 , perchance are you from Spain or a spanish speaking country? (edit: okay, gotcha, I'm from Spain too, that's why I was asking)
{} is an empty set
Now, to be very clear, {} is a "subset" of Y.
{} is not an "element" of Y.
Ok. I understand the element thing.
The fact that the empty set is a subset of every set seems semi-true because it's just not incorrect.
It's vacuously true.
In math, something is true if a counter-example cannot be provided. This is because of the truth table of the implication
Is a vacuously true statement also just true?
Yes. A statement like $\forall x \in A, P(x)$ is true "by default" (vacuously) if $A$ is empty.
Azyrashacorki
Closed by @brisk steeple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello I've been trying to figure out this problem in Karlheinz Spindler's Algebra and I'm not even sure if the hypotheses lead to the conclusion at this point. How do I prove this?
Let $R$ be a ring with identity element 1. Show that all elements of $R$ which are no [sic] zero-divisors have the same order in the abelian group $(R, +)$.
SherlockSage
Here is a hint:
Prove that the elements have same order as 1
@radiant jay Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I used the fact the $e^c = e^x + \sqrt{e^{2x}+1}$ and $e^{-c} = \frac{1}{e^x + \sqrt{e^{2x}+1}}. To find $\frac{3}{2} = \frac{e^x+\sqrt{e^{2x}+1}}{e^x+\sqrt{e^{2x}+1}}$
one sec
You just forgot to close
ye so I am unsure how to proceed. I looked at the key and he has this. I don't see how he obtains the blue part
I used the fact the $e^c = e^x + \sqrt{e^{2x}+1}$ and $e^{-c} = \frac{1}{e^x + \sqrt{e^{2x}+1}}$. To find $$\frac{3}{2} = \frac{e^x+\sqrt{e^{2x}+1}}{e^x+\sqrt{e^{2x}+1}}$$
It seems like they merged the fraction into one
wait I should have a +1 in my fraction
what about our simplification?
Yeah I am thinking how that results to e^x
It's just factoring yeah, I thought I was naive
If you collect the terms in the numerator
And then it's just ln(3/4)=ln(3)-ln(4)=ln(3)-ln(2²)=ln(3)-2ln(2)
Closed by @royal galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you approach something like this?
Do you need to do this by hand?
by hand as in? i need to approximate the right expression based on the left expression
No I meant actually using pen and paper or by the use of a computer
pen and paper
A way is to graph the function and try to use trigonometry to estimate the area under it.
using trigonometry how?
@plain ember Has your question been resolved?
Take a few values of you function, construct this sort of diagram and you can relatively easily approximate the area up to some arbitrary precision
You can see you get a combination of rectangles and triangles
On a slight note, this is a well known algorithm for approximating integrals.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Translate question
haseeb ♥
how far have u gotten
last you left off, you wanted to prove $$\big( (d < p \wedge d\mid p) \implies d = 1 \big) \implies p \quad\text{ prime}$$
haseeb ♥
@stoic imp Has your question been resolved?
well that's a problem
one is a => b
one is (a => c) => b
@stoic imp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I wrote down the triangle inequality , then tried tightening the bound by using AM GM inequality but ended up back on the triangle inequality
Can somebody give me a hint about the right approach here??
Suppose its not true. Then a > b > c and consequently a^n > b^n > c^n. Prove that triangle inequality will be violated for large n
@woven falcon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-39 message
How would I go about doing so??
can you just state which triangle inequality you think would get violated?
there are 3, so which one of them is most likely to fail?
a power n - c power n is less than or equal to b power n?????
yeah
or in other words
a^n <= b^n + c^n
this one will probably get violated quite quickly, since a^n will just grow faster
if you know limits, you could use them
Hmm but then how do we proceed to show that the triangles are isosceles?
well, triangle inequality getting violated would be a contracdition
hence the assumption a > b > c would be wrong
and so at least one of the equalities would have to hold
meaning it would be isosceles
So how can we show it gets violated??
I’m sorry, im a little behind on writing proofs
are you familiar with limits?
if not, it can be done without them. Limits just make it feel a bit more natural ig
you need to show that for large n, a^n > b^n + c^n
@woven falcon Has your question been resolved?
Yes
divide both sides by b^n and take a limit then
Ohh lemme try that
Ok im still not getting it
@autumn fossil 's method is 100% correct
But, you dont need to prove a^n > b^n + c^n
From the triangle side formula, we get $$a^n + b^n > c^n$$
-TimeLord-
Rearanging, we get:
$$a^n + b^n - c^n > 0$$
Ignore this please
Wait never mind. I somehow proves that the triangles are completely valid
Anyways time to switch it into how the triangles are valid
$$1 + b^n/a^n - c^n/a^n > 0$$
-TimeLord-
As @autumn fossil said, we can take the limit as n approaches infinity on the left side. If it is greater than 0, then its good
$$lim n-> infinity (1 + b^n/a^n - c^n/a^n)$$
-TimeLord-
$$lim of n-> infinity (1 + b^n/a^n - c^n/a^n)$$
-TimeLord-
idk how to write it
solving, we get the answer as 1
so it seems the triangles are valid
Closed by @woven falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
to write limits with latex, you type \lim_{n\to\infty}
ohh
also, its faster to use discord bot if you just start the message with ,, instead of covering with $$s
Do you know the proof of the question tho?
Ok
I would really want to knwo
This was my way: Assume a>b>c, then a^n > 2b^n > b^n + c^n for large n, namely n > log(2) / log(a/b)
And so for large n triangle inequality fails - contradiction
Hence one of the > must actuqlly be >= resulting in isosceles tri
Alternative through the limits, you could do
a^n > b^n + c^n
Iff
(a/b)^n > 1 + (c/b)^n
Take lim, you get infty on LHS and 1 on RHS. So for large n it must hold
Wdym
if a=1/2 and b=1/4
Thats still okay
Indeed.
but i dont see a contradiction
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Anyone help with this
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
@austere wraith Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so say i have 2 3d vector v and w
i want to collapse vector w into v in sense that, if we put a plane that is perpendicular to v at the end of w,
our new vector is at the intersection of that plane and v
how do i calculate this ?
after watching this 3b1b video, i feel like you can do it by taking the dot product of w and normalized v ? and then multiply it by normalized v ?
but im not quite sure, and idk how to verify it
can you draw an image of what you want to achieve?
holup
Yes, that is the case and aligns with the usual definition of a projection of a vector on another.
The dot product of w with normalized v gives you the component of w in the direction of v. Multiplying that by normalized v gives you specifically the vector for that component.
If $\vb{v}$ and $\vb{w}$ are linearly independent, then they lie in a common plane. This plane has a basis of orthogonal unit vectors, $\vb{v}{||}$ and $\vb{v}{\perp}$, where $\vb{v}{||} = \hat{\vb{v}}$ and so you get a basis of $\R^3$ : ${\vb{v}{||}, \vb{v}{\perp}, \vb{u}}$. You can take $\vb{u} = \vb{v}{||} \times \vb{v}_{\perp}$, but we don't really care about $\vb{u}$.\
Then this means that $\vb{w} = a\vb{v}{\} + b\vb{v}{\perp} + c\vb{u}$ for some $a,b,c \in \R$. $\vb{w} \cdot \vb{v}{||} = a$, which is the component of $\vb{w}$ in the direction of $\vb{v}{||}$, and therefore in the direction of $\vb{v}$.\
$a\vb{v}_{||}$ is specifically the vector pointing in this direction.\
You can check that $a\vb{v}_{||}$ lies in the plane $\vb{v}\cdot (\vb{x} - \vb{w}) = 0$.
Azyrashacorki
@empty hemlock Has your question been resolved?
The point is that :
- the collapsing you're talking about is really just projection in R^3
- it corresponds to computing the component of w which goes solely in the same direction as v
- you can check that the vector in the direction of v with this component points exactly to the intersection of v and the plane normal to v going through w
is this formula correct ?
wait dotP is wrong, i already move out the normalizing scalar
i think im confusing mysekf from not marking normalized vector
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-39 message
The formula is $\text{proj}{\vb{v}}(\vb{w}) = \frac{\vb{w} \cdot \vb{v}}{||\vb{v}||} \frac{\vb{v}}{||\vb{v}||}$.\
In coordinates that means $$\text{proj}{\vb{v}}(\vb{w}) = \frac{v_x w_x + v_y w_y + v_z w_z}{\sqrt{v_x^2 + v_y^2 + v_z^2}} \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{v_x^2 + v_y^2 + v_z^2}} \begin{bmatrix} v_x\ v_y \ v_z\end{bmatrix}=\frac{v_x w_x + v_y w_y + v_z w_z}{v_x^2 + v_y^2 + v_z^2} \begin{bmatrix} v_x\ v_y \ v_z\end{bmatrix}$$.
Azyrashacorki
@empty hemlock Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @empty hemlock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
!msgdel
The original post of this help channel has been deleted, and it will abruptly close and possibly lock. (This is irreversible.) Please claim a new channel, and don't delete the first message of any future channel you claim.
please move to another channel.
Why..?
and please don't delete the initial message when you claim a channel in the future, as a gentle reminder.
you deleted the initial message of this channel, thus forcibly closing the channel.
this action is not reversible and the channel cannot be reopened.
uhh if you are done please type .close
it's forcibly closed.
.close
just leave it be.
Sorry guys. Got legged and deleted it by accident
nw.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok please can I get some help with this exercise
I kind of understand but at the same time I dont
the idea is for example, if a) is a definition of primality, then
a) holds for p <=> p is prime
so what I have been doing so far is that, I pick random values for p (both prime numbers and composite numbers) and try to see if a) holds when p is prime and if it doesnt hold if p is composite
after this, I get a general idea of whether a) is a possible definition or not (if for example I try many p primes that make a) be true aswell as if I try many composite p that make a) be false)
after this, I get a general idea of whether a) is a definition of primality, suppose every p i try if it is prime it makes a) be true and if p is composite then a) be false, after all this p I try then I would like to prove this a) is a definition of prime number, so I would like to prove
a) <=> p is prime
the left direction <= is simple, suppose p is prime then d | p means d is 1 or d is p, but since d < p then d = 1, so if p is prime a) holds
what I am struggling with is the right direction =>
that is,
a) holds for p => p is prime
.close
Closed by @stoic imp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Stuff like (pi + v) = sin(0) is… called?
So that I can search it on YouTube
equation
Troll
I need EXACT thing so i can understand this
Give some more context lol like which chapter, etc
v = -pi
no equation
Trigonometric identities
put the trigo function before the 1st bracket bruv
my dumb ahh thinking what da fuc is this
Don’t call me dumb
complementary angles
He didn't call you dumb....
these could be called co-function identities, or trig identities
i said my dumb ahh u dumbass
now i am calling u dumb
You’re so disrespectful
thank you ,dumb
How can these things result into cosinus?
the spelling 😭
(co)sinus
if you graph the functions on a graphing calculator you will see they are equal
cosine and sine are the same function, just shifted over a bit.
Nah one is opposite and other adjacent
if you wanna search these on youtube just type these equations and search
answer what?
What does cos range to
@winged pulsar what is sin(0)?
the range of both sin and cos is -1 to 1
0 is theta
But tg?
whats tg
what do you mean "but tg"
Tangans
tan, i'm assuming
Tan is called tg I think
like tg for tangent
Yes tg is called tangens
the range of tan is all real numbers
In mathematics, "tg" is a notation for the trigonometric tangent function, often used in Eastern European, German, and Russian contexts, or in older mathematical literature. It represents the same function as
tan
t
a
n
. The formula is defined as the ratio of the sine to the cosine, or the opposite side to the adjacent side in a right triangle:
t
g
(
𝜃
)
=
s
i
n
(
𝜃
)
c
o
s
(
𝜃
)
=
o
holy ai
even ai is better than this
Literally tangent
Fr
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
yep
i hope you know we cant read this. format it better or take a screenshot of what you are trying to say.
I was searching up the definition.
Not my problem that discord did that
do you have an actual question to ask?
We get that tangents is called tg
sure. whats your question...
i feel like we answered his original question
Y’all should know better lowkey…
Alright, if you are done you can close this then
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Ong don’t test me
well, I've had enough
!close
<@&268886789983436800> non-cooperative OP
its .close
.close
WHAT?
on top of stuff like this
.close
Closed by @winged pulsar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
But it’s true… y’all in college and you should know different namings…
Just like people use • instead of x
I never heard of tan being tg
doesn't give you the pass to go ham on the helpers.
we don't all live in europe.
I'm in europe 
and also not all 30k people in this server have gone to the same school as you have
you can use what you want to, but if someone asks you to clarify then you are meant to clarify.
the problem isn't with you using tg. the problem is that you are insinuating less of helpers who don't share your notation.
OP is probably ragebaiting
either way, I'll let the mods look into this
I just simply said what tg is and you all started to bring bitchy about it
who is bitchy
you may want to look at your own attitude as well.
but either way, the mods have been called so
if you want to provide more stuff for the mods to look at by all means
I'm disengaging
There’s no need I’m not breaking any rules
.this seems like a language issue and a... temperament mismatch. maybe next time you'll be matched with helpers that mirror your learning style better.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this correct so far
your first sign error got cancelled out by yet another sign error giving you the correct answer in the end
and yes the antiderivative of sin is -cos
Do you want a proof by first principles
@quick venture Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you can try multiplying the mclaurin series. But i suggest you look a bit more for a pattern. its definitely there. make sure you are evaluating the derivative at 0 at every step. you will find a pattern
use complex numbers
the hint was to use complex numbers
Closed by @cosmic fox
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, may I have some help on my test review? I’m just out of it today and I don’t know a lot about this subject due to personal matters. I’d really appreciate some help.
It’s four pages but we can see how just this first page goes.
Here’s the helping paper we can use
Asked for help earlier but got mixed up in something and had to leave
is this conversion rates?
hi do you want help for all the questions?
or are there any specifics
So far, yes. If you have the time. Like I said, I’m not too good at this haha.
mind giving me something you want to tackle first
anything specific you want to go through first?
I guess we can start with d if I have a b c correct?
ah conversion of 200km to miles?
is it that one?
Yep that’s d
divide 200 and 1.6?
yes
125
which is 8/5
yeah
but if 200 is 8/5
you can divide 200 by 8
which is 25
and multiply by 5
for 125
i see i see
thats if you dont have a calculator
theyre like these ones
24 degrees c to farenheit
one sec
c equals 5/9 (f-32)
oh wait we are finding f
5/9c +32
is your equation
what would you do in your head
and c is 24 right? so am i doing 5/9 x 24 + 32?
i got 45.many 3's
so you replace certain phrases for numbers
wrong way
The conversion for C to F is f = (9/5) . c + 32
9/5 *
not 5/9 *
i was doing it on my phone before