#help-39
1 messages Ā· Page 230 of 1
oh this looks dirty
yeah what if you integrate by parts twice
and then it should work out I think?
wait let me look at something
What do you mean by that?
Also can someone remind what is integration by parts? is it the integration method using multiplication rule of derivatives?
like, maybe pick the $u$ that hylke suggested and $dv=\frac{1}{1+x^2}$
00100000
it's basically $\int u~dv=uv-\int v~du$
00100000
Ah yes
How you know to use this one and not substitution method or something else? experience? or I can tell by something specific here
00100000
00100000
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
yes you do
$\dd v$
00100000
there we go!
the thing about LaTeX commands is that they look \like{this} generally, and the name of the command is a sequence of letters without spacing between them
lmao allow me to use dirty syntax on mathcord
so if some other letter brushes up against that
you can get unrecognized commansd
commands*
e.g. \sinx fails
ye ye ik ik. it's like the whole $\frac 12$ thing
00100000
but a number, bracket or whatever else breaks the sequence
I'm stuckš«”
owh
Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.
Oh wait i have arctanx
I want arctan^2x so i can get I(x)
How?
Oh wait if i do integration by parts again
Nvm
v is wrong here
you can use IBP on I(x)
oh wait you fixed it, my bad
I(x) = int of arctan²(x)dx
put , u=arctan²(x) , du = 2arctan(x)/(1+x²)dx , dv =dx , v =x
and compare it with this
it's imaginary I think
How u=arctan²(x) when my expression only has arctan(x)
What is
I'm a bit lost ngl
Didn't I already do this
ĪCĪ£ā
ĪCĪ£ā
and this is the first integral
use IBP on the first
Ok
dv= dx ?
yep
U can do that?
No i just thought u need a function dx is not function
No problem
true
Tysm!!
No problem
.close
if you have more integrals you can send them
Closed by @rapid wagon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Ok!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\rho=4, \theta=\frac{\pi}{3}$
Task Bot
corresponds to $z = 2+2 \sqrt {3}i$?
Task Bot
,w 4e^{i pi/3}
,calc 2 sqrt(3)
Result:
3.4641016151378
seems okay.
Because the solution says $2\sqrt{3}+2i$
Task Bot
š
misprint maybe
Okay!
or maybe you read the argument wrong
Write in algebraic form the complex numbers they have as a form and
as the main topic the pairs of numbers indicated below
It says this
hmm
book is wrong
Closed by @desert solar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i want to see if my steps are true
I don't see any mistakes
where are you typesetting this
the exponents are very very indistinct rn
like i legit thought they were all asterisks
$(a+ib)^n , (\sqrt{a^2+b^2})^n$
ĪCĪ£ā
?
relies on an unspoken assumption that a>0
like what you've essentially recreated is de moivre's formula except arg(a+ib) ends up off by half a turn if a < 0.
no, $\sqrt{a^2} = |a|$ not just $a$.
Ann
\a is not a command.
so are there problem too ?
i just told you exactly where i saw a problem.
if you want, i can repeat myself n times.
i'd rather not do that though.
ok dont be mad
i am not mad.
we can try for some values
@midnight haven why are you shushing me?
try a=-1, b=0. your y ends up as 0 and you get (-1)^n = 1.
i see , so "a" should be more than 0
this is what i said all along.
it would have been much better if you heard and understood me the first time i said it.
Closed by @dapper spruce
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
the more you say "don't be mad" the more likely it is that the other person will actually get mad because of that
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Factor $z^4-2z^3+12z^2-14z+35=0$
Task Bot
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
$z(z^3-2z^2+12z-14+35/z)=0$
Task Bot
this is a fake factorization and is completely in the wrong direction
Wdym
I can try to divide by Z-1
$(z^4-2z^3+12z^2-14z+35)/(z-1)$
Task Bot
,w (z^4-2z^3+12z^2-14z+35)/(z-1)
$(1-2i)(1+2i)(-i\sqrt{7})(i\sqrt{7})=0$
Task Bot
,w graph z^4-2z^3+12z^2-14z+35
Here you have to use Wolfram
How to read these graphics
š
,w graph z^4-2z^3+12z^2-14z+35=0
.close
Closed by @desert solar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For quetsions like the following:
Where y = equation find the points on the parabola or equation which are closet to point (a,b)
when do I need to do (x+a) or (x-a) added to (y+b) or (y-b)?
There's many ways such a question could be handled, but you seem to have a method in mind. Does the method have a name? Or do you have an example of that method being used?
This is how it is done in answer keys and I was just curious on how I should be handeling it or if their are other alternatives, etc...
Did you have a question about this solution?
Yes I do
Where they do (y-3) (where y is replaced with 6 - x^2)
when do I know
I need to do y-3 as opposed to y+3
This line is the distance between (x,y) and (0,3)
It could have been written:
d² = (x - 0)² + (y - 3)²
You'd never write + 3
Note they are just finding the distance between (x,y) and (0,3), then minimizing that distance by taking a derivative in terms of x
what if it was (x,y) and (-1,-3)
would I be doing
d^2 = (x+1)^2 + (y+3)^2
Yes I understand that part clearly
Alright then thanks a lot!
.close
Closed by @spice nest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm so confused by this question on definition integrals. It's for finding the rectangle approximation problems, like you would find in 5.1 [https://openstax.org/books/calculus-volume-1/pages/5-1-approximating-areas]
But what the fuck man, I come up with insaaaane numbers and it wants some equation form?
https://i.imgur.com/ICZJMEs.png - this isn't a homework question just practice.
I'm looking at my notes and the textbook and I don't see /anything/ remotely similar on generating an expression for A=
is it just asking for like integral lower bound 1, upper bound 6 f(x)dx?
it is asking for the sum version
Yes
Itās riemann integration
it gives you an explicit formula for both $x_i$ and $\Delta x$, which you can simply plug into the given definition
Yeah
cloud
why would it ask me for something that has the answer higher up though
note that it does want you to calculate this as the limit of the sum, not using the fundamental theorem of calculus
interesting
so you'll have to plug in f, x_i, Delta x, and find the limit
But itās still just an integral
you compute the sum as a function of n and then take the limit as n approaches infinity
that's what the definition says
This is actually needlessly complicated, if b-a/n is just 5/n
xi is just 1+ (1 through 6) times 5/n
Then you have to plug in n, n(n+1)/2, up to 6....
i is an index variable which varies between 1 and n (in the sum)
right but it's between 1 and 6 because of the interval
i is the index of a particular rectangle, so its range (1 to n) depends on the number of rectangles (n), not the length of the interval
broad overview of your steps:
- calculate the expression in the sum as a function of i and n
- sum that expression with i ranging from 1 to n
- take the limit as n approaches infinity
yeah I'm completely lost none of this is making any sense
the textbook doesn't match what it's asking
my notes are about an example of x+x^2+x^3 which just translates into pure numbers not an expression
it's not (5/n)(1+i/(5/n)) so I don't see what I'm doing wrong
delta is is 5/n, a is 1
In this video, I showed how evaluate a definite integral using the Riemann Sum Definition
that nearly correct for $\Delta x \cdot x_i$, but what they are looking for is not that but $f(x_i) \cdot \Delta x$
cloud
looking at the question more closely i don't think you actually have to evaluate the sum/limit, but you do need to write it out correctly
so here is an example just focusing on writing the sum itself: https://youtube.com/watch?v=eidemLqiPyQ
Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicingāand saving your progressānow: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/ap-calculus-ab/ab-integration-new/ab-6-3/v/rewriting-definite-integral-as-limit-of-riemann-sum
Given a definite integral expression, we can write the corresponding limit of a Riemann sum with infinite rectangles.
P...
yeah it's just not computing in my head how to go through it
I'll get it but this example was not explained at all in class
you have all of the information you need in the problem image, it's just a matter of applying it
yeah that first video helped a lot I think, if this is the right way
but wtf how does a fraction change it because he's taking merely addition
like it's i^2 + i + 1 at the end, whereas mine is i/i^2+i+1
i's cancel out?
well the placement of i is based on where x was
for this problem they only ask for "an expression" so i think you can just write out the sum without evaluating it
Got the submission wrong so working through new one
This shit is fucking aids tiny annoying steps
that's wrong apparently
even following the videos steps it's not right lol
what function and region are you trying to compute for?
So I'm starting with 6(2+(3/n)i) on the top, then on the bottom I'm getting (9/n^2)i^2 + (12/n)i + 4
so +5?
Yh
I don't get this
at all
let me try cnacelling out the (/n)i
nope
what in the fuck is this question even asking me man
webwork generally doesn't require you to simplify your answers
oh
I forgot to multiply by 3/n
that was the most aids question I've done all year
so you take x subscript i to substitute for X, map it out algebraically then multiply that by delta x
@heady vault Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @heady vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am learning how to find the derivative of exponential functions
For this example,
y = 2^x + 3^x
The final answer in the answer key is (2^x)(ln2) + (3^x)(ln3)
Is this really how far you can go with it?
Bonk
Ok, thanks so much!
I have another question
So for f(x) = 3e^2x - 2^3x,
I got 6e^2x - (2^3x)(ln2)(3)
Can I multiply the 3 and the 2^3x?
So I would get 6e^2x - (6^3x)(ln2)
?
no
Why not?
I thought that would matter when you are collecting light terms through addition or subtraction.
Oh
if i do 3 * 2^3 i get 3 * 2 * 2 * 2 which is not equal to 6 * 6 * 6 which is 6^3
I see, that makes sense
So it changes the exponents
It would lose its original meaning
Ok thank you
if you had 3^3 * 2^3, then you can make it 6^3
So if the exponents are the same, then you can multiply them?
yes
and you can see this once again when you expand them
$3^3=3\cdot 3\cdot 3\2^3=2\cdot 2\cdot 2\3^3\cdot 2^3=3\cdot 3\cdot 3\cdot 2\cdot 2\cdot 2=(3\cdot 2)\cdot (3\cdot 2)\cdot(3\cdot 2)\=6\cdot6\cdot6=6^3$
Bonk
I see!
But if we had something like 3^2 and 2^3, then it wouldn't work, right?
3 * 3 * 2 * 2 * 2 = 72
And then if you somehow multiply them together, I'm not even sure how that would work out cuz you can't do it
Ok thank you so much, I get it now
you could rewrite it as 3^2 * 2^2 2 and then
(32)^2 (2)
indeed, but what you can do is something like 3^2 = 3^3/3 => 3^2 * 2^3=(6^3)/3
Oh wait that's right
OHH you guys are right
So you're saying I would have 2^2 * 3^2 = 6^2
then just have the other 2 multiplied alone?
So like 6^2 * 2
Wait I am having a bit of trouble reading that math, is it okay if you can do it on that math drawing thing
$3^2=\frac{3^3}{3}, \frac{(3\cdot2)^3}{3}$
yoboiqimmah
\begin{align*}&3^2=\frac{3^3}3\&3^2\cdot 2^3=\frac{3^3}3\cdot2^3=\frac{6^3}3\end{align*}
Bonk
clearer?
Yes, that's much better! But I don't understand what the second line is trying to do. I don't understand what 6^3/3 is supposed to mean or do
idk either
just a different way of writing it
doesnt necessarily need to have a use
what does have a use is being able to recognise that you can rewrite it
Mmm
So what is 6^3/3 supposed to represent
I get the first line, with the rewriting of 3^2
since perhaps you get an exercise where having it has 6^3/3 is more useful than 3^2*2^3
,calc 6^3/3
Result:
72
Oh, I see
3^2 * 2^3 isn't specific to my original question, you were showing how that expression can be rewritten
That makes sense now, quite new too
yeah
and being able to rewrite equations is a very useful skill to have
That's really true
I can't tell you how many times I am doing math problems and I look at the way someone solved it and I'm like, "that's possible to do??"
It feels like illegal math but somehow you can do it
Very cool
lol youll have this feeling for the rest of your mathematical career
stronger year by year if anything haha
LMAO
true
Do you guys happen to know if it is possible to save a PDF of my convos here so I can refer back to them
Is that possible?
Aside from taking screenshots
this works as long as the messages dont get deleted
Do these channels get deleted or do they keep getting recycled
I saw some ones got wiped
Alright good to know, thanks so much for your help
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@frosty grail Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @frosty grail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @tiny jay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
Find all odd positive integers
n > 1 such that if a and b are relatively prime divisors of n, then a + b ā 1 divides n.
.close
Closed by @storm verge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can a slope be equal to 0 in a linear equation graphed if Ax + By = C, so By = C - Ax, so, if A, B, C are constants, C - Ax_1 must be different of C - Ax_2 ?
If x_1 isn't equal x_2
What is the slope of the line graphed by Ax + By = C?
I probably used the wrong terms, but if you have a graph like this one
It is a linear equation correct
Correct
Good
What I mean is
In the general case Ax + By = C, what is the slope?
In terms of A, B, and C
The
In this case, for the slope to be 0, if x1 ā x2,
B(y1-y2) = (C-Ax1) - (C-Ax2)
B(y1-y2) = A(x2-x1)
As slope = (y1-y2)/(x1-x2),
slope = -A/B
A can be 0
Hence, if A is 0, slope is 0
Unless A=B=0 in which case it's either the entire 2d plane or none of it
( y_2 - y_1 ) / ( x_2 - y_2 )
??
I mean yeah that's basically the answer, much better to let him work it out though than just telling him
But yes it's -A/B
I was asking whether he understood that process
I thought samuel asked this thing so I replied with the answer
Then I realised it and deleted it lol
damn
I don't quite understand this one
Which step?
Primarily the first one, I knew slope was y2 - y1 / x2 - x1
How does taht work with A B C
Yes
don't worry
Suika
Suika
ok
$slope=\frac{By_1-By_2}{B(x_1-x_2)}$
Suika
$slope=\frac{(C-Ax_1)-(C-Ax_2)}{B(x_1-x_2)}$
Suika
$slope=\frac{(C-C-Ax_1 + Ax_2)}{B(x_1-x_2)}$
Suika
$slope=\frac{(Ax_2 - Ax_1)}{B(x_1-x_2)}$
Suika
$slope=\frac{-A(x_1 - Ax_2)}{B(x_1-x_2)}$
Suika
$slope=-\frac{A}{B}$
Suika
So, if A = 0, it's possible that the slope is 0
Wait
Wouldn't it be $slope=\frac{A(x_2 - x_1)}{B(x_1-x_2)}$
samuel
So here you use $slope=\frac{B(y_2-y_1)}{B(x_2-x_1)}$
samuel
Does that make sense?
Yes
Awesome
It is that
I just switched the x1 and x2 and put a minus there
I understand nwo
So I could simply say that C - Ax_1 is equal to C - Ax_2 if A is 0
That was pretty simple
lol
thanks a lot Suika and depression
.close
Closed by @umbral lodge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
indeed, but it is their name 
Yea lol
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Assume there is an interger number of a very large digits (it is unknown how large the number is).
We will call this X.
Then there is also Y, which are an interger number from number 1 to 99.
Assuming X and Y always positive {X > 0; Y > 0}
F = X - Floor(X/Y) * Y
F will only result in interger number of 0 to 10.
is that statement true?
Try it with Y=99000000000000000 and X = 99
Yeah sorry I meant the other way round
there fixed
it should be
F = X - Floor(X/Y) * Y
i only changed that ^
I think it's 0 to 99 instead
Not 0 to 10
yeah
how do you achieve 99?
wait hold up
no, that is 9
@cosmic saffron Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cosmic saffron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
\bf{Prove that every convergent sequence is bounded}
\
It follows by definition, If a sequence converges to $L$, that $\forall \varpesilon >0, \exists N \in \N$, such that if $n \geq N$, then $\abs{a_n-L}< \varepsilon$.
\
If a sequence is bounded, by say, $M$, then $\abs{a_n} \leq M; \forall n \in \N$
\
\t proof: By the reverse triangle inequality, it follows that $\abs{a_n} -\abs{L} < \abs{ \varpesilon}$
\
OR
\
$\abs{a_n} < L + \varepsilon$
I'm stuck beyond this
What a wonderful world !
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Your start is great.
an < L + e. So for all n > N, an is bounded.
thought tbf, the contrapositive may be easier to prove
yea
but what about n<N
There's finitely many. So, there's a maximum element.
There might be a better way to say that haha
I'll have to show that I think
sounds like a modified version of WOP
A set with finitely many elements has a least and greatest element
No idea how I'd prove that though
this is much simpler
hmm?
Does this follow from some sort of axiom?
you can try proving it by induction later. for now just take it for granted
Cool, thanks!
Wait, I'm sort of confused here, epsilon can blow up to infty right
so how is it bounded
epsilon doesnt blow up to shit
you can fix ε = 0.42069
then you get that a tail of your sequence is bounded by |L| + 0.42069
and before the tail you have only a finite number of terms
Yeah, but the defn says for a;ll epsilon>0
if you know it converges already, then you can pick any epsilon you want and be guaranteed an N for it
for all positive epsilon, and in particular for epsilon=0.42069
Ah, got it
Thanks
I would like to do another proof now( of the algebric limit theorm) now
More specifically for the product
We wish to show that $\abs{a_nb_n - ab} < \varepsilon$
What a wonderful world !
you want to do it w/ epsilonics directly?
yea
cause there's an easier and less crunchy way to do it
"epsilonics" I like that
thats like, more structured by being broken down into a bunch of lemmas
would you like to hear me out on that
yea
Definition: A sequence (x_n) is said to be null if lim x_n = 0.
Lemma 1: If a sequence (a_n) converges to a finite limit L, then the sequence (a_n - L) is null.
Lemma 2: If (x_n) is a null sequence and L is a real number, then lim (x_n + L) = L.
Lemma 3: The sum of two null sequences is another null sequence. [That is, if (x_n) and (y_n) are null sequences, then (x_n + y_n) is null too.]
Lemma 4: The product of a null sequence and a bounded sequence is a null sequence. [That is, if (x_n) is a null sequence and (b_n) is a bounded sequence (which actually need not converge!), then (b_n x_n) is null.]
yes
but all of these lemmas have very easy proofs that you should not overthink.
ok there we go all formatting and typos fixed
once you have all of those lemmas, use your "convergent implies bounded" result to get the product thing:
let $\lim a_n = L$ and $\lim b_n = M$. consider the sequences $a'_n := a_n - L$ and $b'_n := b_n - M$, both of which are null by lemma 1. then write: $$a_nb_n = (L+a'_n)(M+b'_n) = LM + Lb'_n + Ma'_n + a'_nb'_n$$
each term other than the first is a null sequence by lemma 4 and the ``convergent implies bounded'' theorem. by lemma 3, the sequence $(Lb'_n + Ma'_n + a'_nb'_n)$ is null, and so by lemma 2 we get $a_n b_n \to LM$, as desired.
Ann
(note that this proof is quite terse so do not try to skip over lines you don't understand)
No, it all makes sense to me
glad it does.
the spirit of what im trying to convey here is that the idea of breaking a big problem down into manageable chunks pays rather big dividends.
at no point did i have to do any heavy epsilon lifting
(i do acknowledge that a breakdown may not always be obvious, which is why i am sharing mine here)
another classic divide n conquer is "all polynomials are continuous"
thanks
there's another one in probability theory: E[XY] = E[X]E[Y] for X, Y indep
is that not how independent events are defined?
RVs not events
no it's not
its a theorem not a def
the definition of two RVs X and Y being independent is that for any borel-measurable sets A, B ā R the events {X ā A} and {Y ā B} are independent-as-events
or to put this in a less formal way
to say X and Y are independent is to say that any event having to do with just X is independent of any event having to do with just Y
ahh okay that makes sense
I want to prove something quite simple now
if $a_n \geq 0 \forall n \in \N$, then $a \geq 0$, where $lim(a_n)=a$
u didnt define a
oops
What a wonderful world !
a drawing may help
What a wonderful world !
I let $\varepsilon = \abs{a}$
What a wonderful world !
bad use of reverse triangle but ok choice of e
yea, my bad
$\abs{a_n - a} < \varepsilon$
This means $a_n<0$, which isn't possible
What a wonderful world !
exactly how do u get a_n<0
What a wonderful world !
so $\abs{a_n - a} < \abs{a}$
What a wonderful world !
if $a_n>0$, then $\abs{a_n-a} > \abs{a}$
What a wonderful world !
thats not clear
hmm
so $\abs{a_n-a}<\abs{a}$
a_n^2+a^2-2aa_n<a^2 \implies $a_n(a_n-2a)<0$. So $a_n<2a$ and $a_n<0$
What a wonderful world !
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
that looks complicated and probably wrong
yeah i dont believe the last step
redo n think simpler
I mean one way is $a_n-a<-a$
What a wonderful world !
np!
.close
Closed by @sharp smelt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
to find the other roots
what i did
is i found the conjugate
and multiplied it with the normal thingy
then divided the answer of multiplication with the original equation
is this correct?
Yep
after this step you should get x^2 + 2x + 3
where did he get that from
yeah then you just divide the quartic by x^2 + 2x + 3
Is that not what you did?
this is not my work
im confused on where x- (-1 +square root of 2) came from
where did x- come from
if $r$ is a root of a polynomial, then $x - r$ is a linear factor
south
say if 3, 5 were the roots of a quadratic
the quadratic would be y = a * (x - 3)(x - 5)
a being some real number: this is the root form of a quadratic
You can decompose a polynomial into a product of its linear factors
Yh
Wait, that's a tautology
In south's example
If you had a quadratic $x^2 + 5x + 6$ and decided to factorize it: you get $(x + 3)(x + 2)$
StrangeQuarkAL
right
StrangeQuarkAL
See how I've decomposed the quadratic as a product of linear factors?
yea
Same thing here
$P(x) = x^4 + ...$
It is a quartic so it has 4 roots
$P(x) = (x - a)(x - b)(x - c)(x - d)$
StrangeQuarkAL
where a, b, c and d are the roots
i dont really understand but since my exam is tomorrow should i just do x-(z) * x-(z conjugate) to any similar questions?
Technically yes but it's important to understand this and it's a little nuanced than that
Lemme at least finish my explanation
alright sure
Do you agree that the quartic (4th degree polynomial) has 4 (not necessarily distinct) roots?
yea
Alright
Closed by @mint glade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Epic
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the slope m = tan(theta)
Doesnt the fact that its a point of inflection tell us that the slope is just -1?
Hi south ā¤ļø
nope
But the slope is changing from negative to positive no?
I mean the slope of the point of inflection
You can have an inflexion point with an always positive slope (x³)
Yeah when its changing from concave up to concave down, right?
We can see an example in this graph
hopefully you get the idea
and the slope can be positive too at a point of inflection
yeah the slope can be anything, including 0
For example
(think of y = x^3 for the slope being 0)
Hmm ok I see your point
Whats that? I havent heard of a sign chart before
Didn't see you was at (d)
Hmm I dont think ive covered that yet
We do it way before second derivative and all this stuff kekw
For solving inequality mostly
Ok so to solve I just take f'(pi/8) then add 45 degrees? (because its the y axis instead of x axis, right?
nope
Ahh im self studying so I might have missed some stuff hehe
Ic
that's dimensionally incorrect
f'(pi/8) is not an angle
a slope is not an angle
Ah sry I mean we put the answer into arctan
Then add 45 degrees
good so far
But I guess thats wrong too
this is wrong
just look at the diagram
also just to make sure we're on the same page, you want the angle between the tangnet line and the y-axis
Ah so we take our answer from the arctan away from 180 degrees?
nope
so arctan(-2) is negative right?
okay what's the green angle then?
Is -2 the slope?
yes
I thought that arctan(-2) would give us this angle
nope, that purple angle is not negative
The angle between the x axis and the slope
arctan always returns an angle in either the 1st or the 4th quadrants
Ok good rule im adding that to my notes haha
yes pls, it's super important
intuitively you can see that that obtuse angle can't possibly be 63 deg
And we know whether its the 1st or 4th by its sign right?
yes
nearly
cause arctan(-2) is negative, we need to negate it to make the angle positive again
Ahh yeye
Okkkk
I understand now
Which is 90 - 63 = 26 degrees
27, whatever š
I get the method thats the most important hehe
Thank you everyone!
ā¤ļø
.close
Closed by @lucid moth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You guys
Better explain
It
Explain why continuous value means I have to encode it with numbers
Or face the wrath of a loyal servant of Mickey Mouse
Choose wisely
this is quite the combative tone from you
I hate it, I should be informed of that
well text isnt very "continous"
firstly, you must always change a whole letter. You cant change 1/2 or 1/10th of a letter
Yeah letters are quantised š
and you will probably want words like "large" and "big" to be close together, because they have similar meanings
im pretty sure that 3b1b makes this point somewhere in the vid
so just keep watching
yes he does.
@naive dirge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
C.) The length of the median to side CD in Triangle ACD is 22.44 . find k
we would appreciate if its english
took me a bit to type
could you translate it?
@brazen swift Has your question been resolved?
Sure, i just translated whatever i thought was necessary
but sure ill translate all of it
Points A , B , C , D are on the Parameter of a circle. Given:
AB || CD , <Bad = α , <CAD = 20 , AE = k
A. 1) Express using α the angles of triangle ACE
2) Express with k and α the length of sides CD & AB
B) Given: Surface of triangle ABE is 6.41147 times bigger than the Surface of triangle CDE. Given: α >20 , calculate α .
**C.) The length of the median to side CD in Triangle ACD is 22.44 . find k **
I'm stuck on C)
sketch with everything that's given^
@brazen swift Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
oh wait sorry i forgot about this
what did you get for B?
ok i think the idea is with B and law of sines, you can find the ratio of AC and CD, and you know AC^2+(CD/2)^2-ACĆCDĆcos(110)=22.44^2, so you can combine them to get a value of AC and CD, then you can use law of cosines to find AD
(hopefully you can ise a calculator for this)
yeah i can
@brazen swift Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @brazen swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how did they also get 129?
Result:
129
Yeah, sin(180-x)=sin(x), just to let you know.
@jolly geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @jolly geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Wait guys so in trigonometry 1 is sinx square plus cosx square but what is -1 is it (1.-1) so [(-1).(sin2 + cos2)] sorry for the simple question I'm going over trigonometry again
yes, you could write -1 = - sin^2(x) - cos^2(x)
Oh it's that simple?
Thanks alot š
Yes, 1 = sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) and if you multiply both sides by -1, it's still valid
if you multiplied it by 2, it would still be valid
2 = 2sin^2(x) + 2cos^2(x)
if you added -2 to both sides, it would again be valid
Oh yeah
-1 = sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) - 2
Just arbitrary example
the point is that you can do almost anything to both sides and it will remain valid
you too :)
.close
Closed by @pallid kestrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey guys, i ran this through a calculator, i multiplied each anser choice by the denominators conjugate on top and bottom and didnt get anything. do i multiply the tops conjugate by the top, and the bottom's conjugate by the bottom or is there smth im missing?
please ping me if you respond :3
Have you rationalised the denominator?
i multiplied each anser choice by the denominators conjugate on top and bottom and didnt get anything.
do this to the original expression instead of each of the answer choices
Can you show your work with the conjugation?
oh, yeah, you gotta do it to the original expression
@next forum
It's (2sqrtx +3)Ć(sqrtx)/4x-9
oh then i didnt do that
Don't give him answer, but lead him
so my ork is pretty irrelevent
Delete this please
i can sho you but i kno its rong no
sorry about my keys messing uo
$(a + b) \cdot (a - b) = a^2 - b^2$
SLANDER
When you divide by a number, multiply by itself.
i think i may actually have a better lead elsehere
thank you for hel;ing me out as much as you did though
have a good day guyss!
.close
Closed by @next forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
!nosols btw
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
question is to find the maclaurin series - how on earth is this right? isn't f(0) undefined?
presumably they're filling in the gap at x=0 by setting f(0) = log(1) = 0
i mean i guess but let's say they didn't do that, would the expansion exist?
no, you have to have f and its derivatives defined at x=0 in order to define the maclaurin series
It is undefined but we know that $$ \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{\sin x}{x} = 1$$, and since $\log$ is continuous, the limit of $f$ as $x \to 0$ is $\log 1 = 0$
elliot
Sorry should say $x \to 0$ in the limit
elliot
right yeah, thats why f(0)=0 is a good like 'fix' to fix the discontinuity
but then when trying to find f' f'' etc given f(0)=0 let's assume (as this isn't in the question), the same thing ends up happening again and again
where the derivative DNE but you can find some sort of 'this would make sense as a fix' value
yep you're gonna have to do more work to show that the values given by the coefficients are consistent with the derivatives of f (with the gap at x=0 plugged in)
Itās not even a āfixā really, itās just the limit as x approaches 0, but you can think about it that way. You will just have to figure out the derivative as normal and figure out what happens near 0 in the limit, similar to above
Thatās when you can use e.g. LāHĆ“pitalās rule
slightly confused as what you mean by it's not a 'fix', i think i meant that in the way that the expansion DNE unless we define f(0) as the limit as x->0 of f(x)
am i wrong to say that the expansion DNE without defining f(0) like that? or am i misunderstanding something else
correct, the expansion DNE if f(0) is not defined
clearly f(0) has to be 0 in order to make f continuous
you have to do more work to show that this also makes it differentiable (at least 4 times) in order to verify the formula
@iron karma Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @iron karma
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I donāt know what to multiply the equation by?
What's the question?
Solve for X.
$a^2 - b^2 = (a+b)(a-b)$
SLANDER
I need to multiply the equation by a common factor from the denominator but how here?
$a^2 + a = a (a + 1)$
SLANDER
Hint: $x^2$ and $1$ are both squares, so apply the above identity
Oliver
See if you can spot a common denominator then
The left side is (X+/-1) but I donāt know about the right side.
How does the LHS denominator factorise using this?
Try to find common denominator, and it would be x + 1 because of 7/(x+1)
What about the other right side term?
Can you factorise that denominator as well?
The 2 coefficiets share a common variable
.
Is it X (X+1)(x-1)?
$x^2 - 1^2 = ?$
SLANDER
$x^2 + x = ?$
SLANDER
Factorise or simplify these parts
X=1
(X-1)^2
Wrong
X(X+1)
Here is the identity
Right
And thatās for the second one?
4/(x² + x)
How is this wrong for the first one?
SLANDER
a = x
and
b = 1
So how would I find the right side?
What does right side mean?
The entire thing?
Factorise all denominatores so u can see x + 1, then multiply by it
$x^2 - 1 = (x + 1) (x - 1)$
SLANDER
Why canāt I add an extra X at front to rid the X squares?
U have x² - 1 not x²
When you multiply by a number, you multiply the whole operation.
Iām aware.
Hmm
You can unify the denominator
$\frac{4x + 1}{x^2 - 1} = \frac{7}{x+1} + \frac{4}{x(x+1)}$
SLANDER
$\frac{4x + 1}{x^2 - 1} = \frac{7x}{x(x+1)} + \frac{4}{x(x+1)}$
SLANDER
Here
Multiply it here
$\frac{4x + 1}{(x+1)(x-1)} = \frac{7x}{x(x+1)} + \frac{4}{x(x+1)}$
SLANDER
@glass jungle
There isnāt an extra X under the 7x
Yeah?
We multiplied by x and divided by itself
Look at here
Yeah I see it
Multiply x(x+1)(x-1) here and calcul
Do u know how to calcul Delta?
Weāve never done delta. This is algebra 2.
Something like b² - 4ac
DISCRIMMINANT
Use it
Get solutions x1 and x2
what's the fucking delta, it's called discriminant
Call it what you want
.close
Closed by @glass jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im supposed to determine 2 equations relating to this sine wave, I know how to find amplitude and vertical phase shift, but because the x intercepts are equitidistant from the origin, how do I know which way it shifted horizontally?
2 equations in the form y = asin[b(x-c)]+d where a > 0 and another equation where a < 0
