#help-39

1 messages Ā· Page 230 of 1

rapid wagon
#

But if I substitue these I still have 2x mixed with the u variables

rare burrow
#

oh this looks dirty

#

yeah what if you integrate by parts twice

#

and then it should work out I think?

#

wait let me look at something

rapid wagon
#

Also can someone remind what is integration by parts? is it the integration method using multiplication rule of derivatives?

rare burrow
#

like, maybe pick the $u$ that hylke suggested and $dv=\frac{1}{1+x^2}$

jolly parrotBOT
#

00100000

rare burrow
jolly parrotBOT
#

00100000

rapid wagon
#

Ah yes

toxic lichen
#

looks better

rapid wagon
#

How you know to use this one and not substitution method or something else? experience? or I can tell by something specific here

rare burrow
#

$\dd{v}$

jolly parrotBOT
#

00100000

rare burrow
#

oh that's hot

#

$\ddv$

jolly parrotBOT
#

00100000
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

rare burrow
#

damn you do need the {}?!?

#

oh wait no

toxic lichen
#

yes you do

rare burrow
#

$\dd v$

jolly parrotBOT
#

00100000

rare burrow
#

there we go!

toxic lichen
#

the thing about LaTeX commands is that they look \like{this} generally, and the name of the command is a sequence of letters without spacing between them

rare burrow
#

lmao allow me to use dirty syntax on mathcord

toxic lichen
#

so if some other letter brushes up against that

#

you can get unrecognized commansd

#

commands*

#

e.g. \sinx fails

rare burrow
#

ye ye ik ik. it's like the whole $\frac 12$ thing

jolly parrotBOT
#

00100000

toxic lichen
#

but a number, bracket or whatever else breaks the sequence

rapid wagon
#

,rccw

#

Integration by parts again?

#

,rccw

jolly parrotBOT
rapid wagon
#

I'm stuck🫔

hazy pilot
#

This is good

#

notice how you have - of the original integral

rapid wagon
#

Omggg

#

Nvm

hazy pilot
#

owh

dapper spruce
#

v' = 1/(1+x²) , so , v=arctan(x)

rapid wagon
#

oh

#

,rccw

jolly parrotBOT
#

Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.

rapid wagon
#

Back to stuck idk

#

,rccw

jolly parrotBOT
rapid wagon
#

Oh wait i have arctanx

#

I want arctan^2x so i can get I(x)

#

How?

#

Oh wait if i do integration by parts again

#

Nvm

rare burrow
dapper spruce
#

you can use IBP on I(x)

rare burrow
dapper spruce
#

I(x) = int of arctan²(x)dx

#

put , u=arctan²(x) , du = 2arctan(x)/(1+x²)dx , dv =dx , v =x

dapper spruce
hazy pilot
#

it's imaginary I think

rapid wagon
rapid wagon
dapper spruce
#

i mean this .

#

use IBP on the first integral

rapid wagon
#

I'm a bit lost ngl

rapid wagon
dapper spruce
#

you did this with the second integral

#

$$\int \frac{\ln(1+x^2)}{1+x^2}dx$$

jolly parrotBOT
#

Ī”CΣ♠

dapper spruce
#

,, \int \arctan^2(x)dx

jolly parrotBOT
#

Ī”CΣ♠

dapper spruce
rapid wagon
#

Ohh

#

Ohhhh

dapper spruce
#

use IBP on the first

rapid wagon
#

Ok

dapper spruce
#

to compare them

dapper spruce
#

yep

rapid wagon
#

U can do that?

dapper spruce
#

why you dont do it

#

its not hard to you

rapid wagon
#

No i just thought u need a function dx is not function

dapper spruce
#

the function is 1

#

1*dx = dx

#

arctan²(x) = 1*arctan²(x)

rapid wagon
#

Oh

#

Sorry im new to integrals

dapper spruce
#

No problem

rapid wagon
#

Is this ok?

dapper spruce
#

true

rapid wagon
#

Tysm!!

dapper spruce
#

No problem

rapid wagon
#

.close

dapper spruce
#

if you have more integrals you can send them

pearl pondBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @rapid wagon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

pearl pondBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

desert solar
#

$\rho=4, \theta=\frac{\pi}{3}$

pearl pondBOT
jolly parrotBOT
#

Task Bot

desert solar
#

corresponds to $z = 2+2 \sqrt {3}i$?

frozen lantern
#

ok

#

....................what.

#

ah rho for r

#

okay

jolly parrotBOT
#

Task Bot

frozen lantern
#

,w 4e^{i pi/3}

frozen lantern
#

,calc 2 sqrt(3)

jolly parrotBOT
#

Result:

3.4641016151378
frozen lantern
#

seems okay.

desert solar
#

Because the solution says $2\sqrt{3}+2i$

jolly parrotBOT
#

Task Bot

desert solar
#

😭

frozen lantern
#

misprint maybe

desert solar
#

Okay!

frozen lantern
#

or maybe you read the argument wrong

desert solar
#

Write in algebraic form the complex numbers they have as a form and
as the main topic the pairs of numbers indicated below

#

It says this

frozen lantern
#

hmm

pale frost
#

book is wrong

desert solar
#

Thanks

#

.close

pearl pondBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @desert solar

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

pearl pondBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dapper spruce
#

.open

pearl pondBOT
dapper spruce
#

i want to see if my steps are true

hazy pilot
#

I don't see any mistakes

toxic lichen
#

the exponents are very very indistinct rn

#

like i legit thought they were all asterisks

dapper spruce
#

$(a+ib)^n , (\sqrt{a^2+b^2})^n$

jolly parrotBOT
#

Ī”CΣ♠

toxic lichen
#

this part

dapper spruce
#

?

toxic lichen
#

relies on an unspoken assumption that a>0

#

like what you've essentially recreated is de moivre's formula except arg(a+ib) ends up off by half a turn if a < 0.

#

no, $\sqrt{a^2} = |a|$ not just $a$.

jolly parrotBOT
toxic lichen
#

\a is not a command.

dapper spruce
#

so are there problem too ?

toxic lichen
#

i just told you exactly where i saw a problem.

#

if you want, i can repeat myself n times.

#

i'd rather not do that though.

dapper spruce
#

ok dont be mad

toxic lichen
#

i am not mad.

dapper spruce
#

we can try for some values

toxic lichen
#

@midnight haven why are you shushing me?

toxic lichen
dapper spruce
#

i see , so "a" should be more than 0

toxic lichen
#

this is what i said all along.

#

it would have been much better if you heard and understood me the first time i said it.

dapper spruce
#

hmm , that doesnt matter , have a nice day and dont be mad

#

.close

pearl pondBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dapper spruce

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

toxic lichen
pearl pondBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

desert solar
#

Factor $z^4-2z^3+12z^2-14z+35=0$

pearl pondBOT
jolly parrotBOT
#

Task Bot

robust oar
#

!status

pearl pondBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
desert solar
#

$z(z^3-2z^2+12z-14+35/z)=0$

jolly parrotBOT
#

Task Bot

toxic lichen
#

this is a fake factorization and is completely in the wrong direction

desert solar
#

Wdym

toxic lichen
#

i mean that this is useless.

#

because you introduce a 1/z

#

you cannot have that

desert solar
#

I can try to divide by Z-1

toxic lichen
#

do it, see if it works.

#

try other rational roots.

desert solar
#

$(z^4-2z^3+12z^2-14z+35)/(z-1)$

jolly parrotBOT
#

Task Bot

desert solar
#

,w (z^4-2z^3+12z^2-14z+35)/(z-1)

desert solar
#

$(1-2i)(1+2i)(-i\sqrt{7})(i\sqrt{7})=0$

jolly parrotBOT
#

Task Bot

desert solar
#

,w graph z^4-2z^3+12z^2-14z+35

#

Here you have to use Wolfram

#

How to read these graphics

#

😭

#

,w graph z^4-2z^3+12z^2-14z+35=0

desert solar
#

.close

pearl pondBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @desert solar

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

pearl pondBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

spice nest
#

For quetsions like the following:

Where y = equation find the points on the parabola or equation which are closet to point (a,b)

when do I need to do (x+a) or (x-a) added to (y+b) or (y-b)?

rough stream
#

There's many ways such a question could be handled, but you seem to have a method in mind. Does the method have a name? Or do you have an example of that method being used?

spice nest
#

This is how it is done in answer keys and I was just curious on how I should be handeling it or if their are other alternatives, etc...

rough stream
#

Did you have a question about this solution?

spice nest
#

Yes I do

#

Where they do (y-3) (where y is replaced with 6 - x^2)

#

when do I know

#

I need to do y-3 as opposed to y+3

rough stream
#

This line is the distance between (x,y) and (0,3)

It could have been written:
d² = (x - 0)² + (y - 3)²

#

You'd never write + 3

#

Note they are just finding the distance between (x,y) and (0,3), then minimizing that distance by taking a derivative in terms of x

spice nest
#

what if it was (x,y) and (-1,-3)

would I be doing

d^2 = (x+1)^2 + (y+3)^2

spice nest
#

Alright then thanks a lot!

#

.close

pearl pondBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @spice nest

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

pearl pondBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

heady vault
#

I'm so confused by this question on definition integrals. It's for finding the rectangle approximation problems, like you would find in 5.1 [https://openstax.org/books/calculus-volume-1/pages/5-1-approximating-areas]

But what the fuck man, I come up with insaaaane numbers and it wants some equation form?
https://i.imgur.com/ICZJMEs.png - this isn't a homework question just practice.

I'm looking at my notes and the textbook and I don't see /anything/ remotely similar on generating an expression for A=

heady vault
#

is it just asking for like integral lower bound 1, upper bound 6 f(x)dx?

rancid depot
#

it is asking for the sum version

heady vault
#

isn't that just like

#

f(xi)dx

full relic
#

It’s riemann integration

sharp vigil
#

it gives you an explicit formula for both $x_i$ and $\Delta x$, which you can simply plug into the given definition

full relic
jolly parrotBOT
full relic
#

It wants the limit

#

So: the integral

heady vault
#

oh god

#

I spent an hour overcomplicating this

#

lmao

full relic
#

Yes

#

Sometimes you gotta not overthink

heady vault
#

why would it ask me for something that has the answer higher up though

sharp vigil
#

note that it does want you to calculate this as the limit of the sum, not using the fundamental theorem of calculus

heady vault
#

interesting

sharp vigil
#

so you'll have to plug in f, x_i, Delta x, and find the limit

full relic
#

But it’s still just an integral

heady vault
#

so it's 1+(3/4(8x/x^2+1))

#

because n is just 4 for a rectangle no?

full relic
#

What do you mean n is 4

#

N is how many rectangles you use

heady vault
#

woops

#

so 3/n

#

What the hell do you use for n?

sharp vigil
#

you compute the sum as a function of n and then take the limit as n approaches infinity

#

that's what the definition says

heady vault
#

This is actually needlessly complicated, if b-a/n is just 5/n
xi is just 1+ (1 through 6) times 5/n

Then you have to plug in n, n(n+1)/2, up to 6....

sharp vigil
#

i is an index variable which varies between 1 and n (in the sum)

heady vault
#

right but it's between 1 and 6 because of the interval

sharp vigil
#

i is the index of a particular rectangle, so its range (1 to n) depends on the number of rectangles (n), not the length of the interval

#

broad overview of your steps:

  1. calculate the expression in the sum as a function of i and n
  2. sum that expression with i ranging from 1 to n
  3. take the limit as n approaches infinity
heady vault
#

yeah I'm completely lost none of this is making any sense

#

the textbook doesn't match what it's asking

#

my notes are about an example of x+x^2+x^3 which just translates into pure numbers not an expression

#

it's not (5/n)(1+i/(5/n)) so I don't see what I'm doing wrong

#

delta is is 5/n, a is 1

sharp vigil
sharp vigil
jolly parrotBOT
sharp vigil
#

looking at the question more closely i don't think you actually have to evaluate the sum/limit, but you do need to write it out correctly

#

so here is an example just focusing on writing the sum itself: https://youtube.com/watch?v=eidemLqiPyQ

Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing—and saving your progress—now: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/ap-calculus-ab/ab-integration-new/ab-6-3/v/rewriting-definite-integral-as-limit-of-riemann-sum

Given a definite integral expression, we can write the corresponding limit of a Riemann sum with infinite rectangles.

P...

ā–¶ Play video
heady vault
#

yeah it's just not computing in my head how to go through it

#

I'll get it but this example was not explained at all in class

sharp vigil
#

you have all of the information you need in the problem image, it's just a matter of applying it

heady vault
#

yeah that first video helped a lot I think, if this is the right way

#

but wtf how does a fraction change it because he's taking merely addition

#

like it's i^2 + i + 1 at the end, whereas mine is i/i^2+i+1

#

i's cancel out?

sharp vigil
#

well the placement of i is based on where x was

#

for this problem they only ask for "an expression" so i think you can just write out the sum without evaluating it

heady vault
#

Got the submission wrong so working through new one

#

This shit is fucking aids tiny annoying steps

#

that's wrong apparently

#

even following the videos steps it's not right lol

sharp vigil
#

what function and region are you trying to compute for?

heady vault
#

So I'm starting with 6(2+(3/n)i) on the top, then on the bottom I'm getting (9/n^2)i^2 + (12/n)i + 4

fickle schooner
#

Missing the +1

#

On the denominator

heady vault
#

so +5?

fickle schooner
#

Yh

heady vault
#

I don't get this

#

at all

#

let me try cnacelling out the (/n)i

#

nope

#

what in the fuck is this question even asking me man

fickle schooner
#

You missed something

#

Delta x

sharp vigil
#

webwork generally doesn't require you to simplify your answers

heady vault
#

oh

#

I forgot to multiply by 3/n

#

that was the most aids question I've done all year

#

so you take x subscript i to substitute for X, map it out algebraically then multiply that by delta x

pearl pondBOT
#

@heady vault Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @heady vault

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

frosty grail
#

I am learning how to find the derivative of exponential functions
For this example,
y = 2^x + 3^x

frosty grail
#

The final answer in the answer key is (2^x)(ln2) + (3^x)(ln3)
Is this really how far you can go with it?

open rivet
#

yup

#

in general: $\dv{x}a^x=\ln(a)\cdot a^x$

jolly parrotBOT
frosty grail
#

I have another question

#

So for f(x) = 3e^2x - 2^3x,
I got 6e^2x - (2^3x)(ln2)(3)

Can I multiply the 3 and the 2^3x?
So I would get 6e^2x - (6^3x)(ln2)

#

?

open rivet
#

no

frosty grail
#

Why not?

open rivet
#

remember what exponents are

#

2^3=2 * 2 * 2

frosty grail
#

I thought that would matter when you are collecting light terms through addition or subtraction.

#

Oh

open rivet
#

if i do 3 * 2^3 i get 3 * 2 * 2 * 2 which is not equal to 6 * 6 * 6 which is 6^3

frosty grail
#

I see, that makes sense

#

So it changes the exponents

#

It would lose its original meaning

#

Ok thank you

open rivet
#

if you had 3^3 * 2^3, then you can make it 6^3

frosty grail
#

So if the exponents are the same, then you can multiply them?

open rivet
#

yes

#

and you can see this once again when you expand them

#

$3^3=3\cdot 3\cdot 3\2^3=2\cdot 2\cdot 2\3^3\cdot 2^3=3\cdot 3\cdot 3\cdot 2\cdot 2\cdot 2=(3\cdot 2)\cdot (3\cdot 2)\cdot(3\cdot 2)\=6\cdot6\cdot6=6^3$

jolly parrotBOT
frosty grail
#

I see!

#

But if we had something like 3^2 and 2^3, then it wouldn't work, right?

3 * 3 * 2 * 2 * 2 = 72

And then if you somehow multiply them together, I'm not even sure how that would work out cuz you can't do it

#

Ok thank you so much, I get it now

edgy wren
open rivet
frosty grail
#

OHH you guys are right

#

So you're saying I would have 2^2 * 3^2 = 6^2
then just have the other 2 multiplied alone?

So like 6^2 * 2

frosty grail
edgy wren
#

$3^2=\frac{3^3}{3}, \frac{(3\cdot2)^3}{3}$

jolly parrotBOT
#

yoboiqimmah

open rivet
jolly parrotBOT
open rivet
#

clearer?

frosty grail
#

Yes, that's much better! But I don't understand what the second line is trying to do. I don't understand what 6^3/3 is supposed to mean or do

open rivet
#

idk either

#

just a different way of writing it

#

doesnt necessarily need to have a use

#

what does have a use is being able to recognise that you can rewrite it

frosty grail
#

Mmm

#

So what is 6^3/3 supposed to represent

#

I get the first line, with the rewriting of 3^2

open rivet
#

since perhaps you get an exercise where having it has 6^3/3 is more useful than 3^2*2^3

open rivet
jolly parrotBOT
#

Result:

72
frosty grail
#

Oh, I see

#

3^2 * 2^3 isn't specific to my original question, you were showing how that expression can be rewritten

#

That makes sense now, quite new too

open rivet
#

and being able to rewrite equations is a very useful skill to have

frosty grail
#

It feels like illegal math but somehow you can do it

#

Very cool

fossil jewel
#

stronger year by year if anything haha

frosty grail
#

LMAO

open rivet
#

true

frosty grail
#

Do you guys happen to know if it is possible to save a PDF of my convos here so I can refer back to them

#

Is that possible?

#

Aside from taking screenshots

open rivet
#

i dont think so

#

but you can keep the message link

frosty grail
#

Oh message link?

#

Ohhhhh

open rivet
#

this works as long as the messages dont get deleted

frosty grail
#

Do these channels get deleted or do they keep getting recycled

#

I saw some ones got wiped

open rivet
#

they get recycled

#

very rarely they get deleted

frosty grail
#

Alright good to know, thanks so much for your help

open rivet
#

!done

pearl pondBOT
#

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close

#

@frosty grail Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @frosty grail

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Closed by @tiny jay

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

pearl pondBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

storm verge
#

hello

pearl pondBOT
storm verge
#

Find all odd positive integers
n > 1 such that if a and b are relatively prime divisors of n, then a + b āˆ’ 1 divides n.

#

.close

pearl pondBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @storm verge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

umbral lodge
#

How can a slope be equal to 0 in a linear equation graphed if Ax + By = C, so By = C - Ax, so, if A, B, C are constants, C - Ax_1 must be different of C - Ax_2 ?

umbral lodge
#

If x_1 isn't equal x_2

thick raven
#

What is the slope of the line graphed by Ax + By = C?

umbral lodge
#

I probably used the wrong terms, but if you have a graph like this one

#

It is a linear equation correct

thick raven
#

Correct

umbral lodge
#

(x, y)

#

And the slope is 0, so ( 4-4 ) / ( -4 - 5 ) = 0

thick raven
#

Good

#

What I mean is

#

In the general case Ax + By = C, what is the slope?

#

In terms of A, B, and C

umbral lodge
thick raven
#

For that line it's 0, but in general what its it?

#

Yes it's always a straight line

umbral lodge
#

idk in terms of A B C

#

but in terms of x and y is

placid geyser
thick raven
#

Unless A=B=0 in which case it's either the entire 2d plane or none of it

umbral lodge
#

( y_2 - y_1 ) / ( x_2 - y_2 )

thick raven
#

Yes

#

But in terms of A, B, and C?

thick raven
#

I mean yeah that's basically the answer, much better to let him work it out though than just telling him

#

But yes it's -A/B

placid geyser
#

I was asking whether he understood that process

placid geyser
#

Then I realised it and deleted it lol

umbral lodge
#

damn

placid geyser
#

Which step?

umbral lodge
#

Primarily the first one, I knew slope was y2 - y1 / x2 - x1

#

How does taht work with A B C

placid geyser
#

So, you see,
By1 = C - Ax1 and By2 = C - Ax2

#

Correct?

umbral lodge
#

Yes

placid geyser
#

$slope=\frac{y_1-y_2}{x_1-x_2}$

#

$slope=\frac{B(y_1-y_2)}{B(x_1-x_2)}$

umbral lodge
#

don't worry

jolly parrotBOT
umbral lodge
#

I got it

#

nice

jolly parrotBOT
umbral lodge
#

ok

placid geyser
#

$slope=\frac{By_1-By_2}{B(x_1-x_2)}$

jolly parrotBOT
placid geyser
#

$slope=\frac{(C-Ax_1)-(C-Ax_2)}{B(x_1-x_2)}$

jolly parrotBOT
placid geyser
#

$slope=\frac{(C-C-Ax_1 + Ax_2)}{B(x_1-x_2)}$

jolly parrotBOT
placid geyser
#

$slope=\frac{(Ax_2 - Ax_1)}{B(x_1-x_2)}$

jolly parrotBOT
placid geyser
#

$slope=\frac{-A(x_1 - Ax_2)}{B(x_1-x_2)}$

jolly parrotBOT
placid geyser
#

$slope=-\frac{A}{B}$

jolly parrotBOT
placid geyser
#

So, if A = 0, it's possible that the slope is 0

umbral lodge
#

Alright

#

That makes a lot of sense

umbral lodge
#

Wouldn't it be $slope=\frac{A(x_2 - x_1)}{B(x_1-x_2)}$

jolly parrotBOT
#

samuel

umbral lodge
jolly parrotBOT
#

samuel

umbral lodge
#

Does that make sense?

placid geyser
#

Yes

umbral lodge
#

Awesome

placid geyser
#

I just switched the x1 and x2 and put a minus there

umbral lodge
#

I understand nwo

#

So I could simply say that C - Ax_1 is equal to C - Ax_2 if A is 0

#

That was pretty simple

#

lol

#

thanks a lot Suika and depression

#

.close

pearl pondBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @umbral lodge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

placid geyser
#

Thanking depression

umbral lodge
#

indeed, but it is their name opencry

placid geyser
#

Yea lol

pearl pondBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cosmic saffron
#

Assume there is an interger number of a very large digits (it is unknown how large the number is).
We will call this X.

Then there is also Y, which are an interger number from number 1 to 99.

Assuming X and Y always positive {X > 0; Y > 0}
F = X - Floor(X/Y) * Y

F will only result in interger number of 0 to 10.

is that statement true?

thick raven
#

Try it with Y=99000000000000000 and X = 99

cosmic saffron
#

Y is 1 to 99

#

oh ... wait

#

I put wrong formula

#

sorry

thick raven
#

Yeah sorry I meant the other way round

cosmic saffron
#

it should be
F = X - Floor(X/Y) * Y

#

i only changed that ^

placid geyser
#

Not 0 to 10

odd surge
#

yeah

cosmic saffron
#

how do you achieve 99?

odd surge
#

wait hold up

cosmic saffron
#

no, that is 9

odd surge
#

if Y is 1 to 99 then F is 0 to 98

#

you can't get 99

cosmic saffron
#

how to achieve 98 then

#

I don't think that possible either

odd surge
#

X = 197, Y = 99

#

then X/Y is less than 2 so floor(X/Y) = 1

F = 197 - 1 * 99 = 98

cosmic saffron
#

oh... you are right

#

Ty all ā¤ļø

pearl pondBOT
#

@cosmic saffron Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @cosmic saffron

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

pearl pondBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sharp smelt
#

\bf{Prove that every convergent sequence is bounded}
\
It follows by definition, If a sequence converges to $L$, that $\forall \varpesilon >0, \exists N \in \N$, such that if $n \geq N$, then $\abs{a_n-L}< \varepsilon$.
\
If a sequence is bounded, by say, $M$, then $\abs{a_n} \leq M; \forall n \in \N$
\
\t proof: By the reverse triangle inequality, it follows that $\abs{a_n} -\abs{L} < \abs{ \varpesilon}$
\
OR
\
$\abs{a_n} < L + \varepsilon$

sharp smelt
#

I'm stuck beyond this

jolly parrotBOT
#

What a wonderful world !
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

rough stream
#

Your start is great.

an < L + e. So for all n > N, an is bounded.

sharp smelt
#

thought tbf, the contrapositive may be easier to prove

sharp smelt
#

but what about n<N

rough stream
#

There's finitely many. So, there's a maximum element.

#

There might be a better way to say that haha

sharp smelt
#

sounds like a modified version of WOP

#

A set with finitely many elements has a least and greatest element

#

No idea how I'd prove that though

toxic lichen
#

this is much simpler

sharp smelt
#

hmm?

sharp smelt
lilac jackal
#

you can try proving it by induction later. for now just take it for granted

sharp smelt
#

Cool, thanks!

sharp smelt
#

so how is it bounded

toxic lichen
#

epsilon doesnt blow up to shit

#

you can fix ε = 0.42069

#

then you get that a tail of your sequence is bounded by |L| + 0.42069

#

and before the tail you have only a finite number of terms

sharp smelt
sharp vigil
#

if you know it converges already, then you can pick any epsilon you want and be guaranteed an N for it

toxic lichen
#

for all positive epsilon, and in particular for epsilon=0.42069

sharp smelt
#

Ah, got it

#

Thanks

#

I would like to do another proof now( of the algebric limit theorm) now

#

More specifically for the product

#

We wish to show that $\abs{a_nb_n - ab} < \varepsilon$

jolly parrotBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

toxic lichen
#

you want to do it w/ epsilonics directly?

sharp smelt
#

yea

toxic lichen
#

cause there's an easier and less crunchy way to do it

sharp smelt
#

if possible

#

sure

rough stream
#

"epsilonics" I like that

toxic lichen
#

thats like, more structured by being broken down into a bunch of lemmas

#

would you like to hear me out on that

sharp smelt
#

yea

toxic lichen
#

Definition: A sequence (x_n) is said to be null if lim x_n = 0.

Lemma 1: If a sequence (a_n) converges to a finite limit L, then the sequence (a_n - L) is null.

Lemma 2: If (x_n) is a null sequence and L is a real number, then lim (x_n + L) = L.

Lemma 3: The sum of two null sequences is another null sequence. [That is, if (x_n) and (y_n) are null sequences, then (x_n + y_n) is null too.]

Lemma 4: The product of a null sequence and a bounded sequence is a null sequence. [That is, if (x_n) is a null sequence and (b_n) is a bounded sequence (which actually need not converge!), then (b_n x_n) is null.]

sharp smelt
#

Hmm

#

I'll have to prove all these lemma's first though, I suppose?

toxic lichen
#

yes

#

but all of these lemmas have very easy proofs that you should not overthink.

#

ok there we go all formatting and typos fixed

#

once you have all of those lemmas, use your "convergent implies bounded" result to get the product thing:

#

let $\lim a_n = L$ and $\lim b_n = M$. consider the sequences $a'_n := a_n - L$ and $b'_n := b_n - M$, both of which are null by lemma 1. then write: $$a_nb_n = (L+a'_n)(M+b'_n) = LM + Lb'_n + Ma'_n + a'_nb'_n$$
each term other than the first is a null sequence by lemma 4 and the ``convergent implies bounded'' theorem. by lemma 3, the sequence $(Lb'_n + Ma'_n + a'_nb'_n)$ is null, and so by lemma 2 we get $a_n b_n \to LM$, as desired.

jolly parrotBOT
toxic lichen
#

(note that this proof is quite terse so do not try to skip over lines you don't understand)

sharp smelt
#

No, it all makes sense to me

toxic lichen
#

glad it does.

#

the spirit of what im trying to convey here is that the idea of breaking a big problem down into manageable chunks pays rather big dividends.

#

at no point did i have to do any heavy epsilon lifting

sharp smelt
#

Yea

#

got it

toxic lichen
#

(i do acknowledge that a breakdown may not always be obvious, which is why i am sharing mine here)

lilac jackal
#

another classic divide n conquer is "all polynomials are continuous"

sharp smelt
#

thanks

toxic lichen
inland ivy
toxic lichen
#

RVs not events

inland ivy
#

right

#

but my question still stands

toxic lichen
#

no it's not

lilac jackal
#

its a theorem not a def

toxic lichen
#

the definition of two RVs X and Y being independent is that for any borel-measurable sets A, B āŠ† R the events {X ∈ A} and {Y ∈ B} are independent-as-events

#

or to put this in a less formal way

#

to say X and Y are independent is to say that any event having to do with just X is independent of any event having to do with just Y

inland ivy
#

ahh okay that makes sense

sharp smelt
#

I want to prove something quite simple now

#

if $a_n \geq 0 \forall n \in \N$, then $a \geq 0$, where $lim(a_n)=a$

lilac jackal
#

u didnt define a

sharp smelt
#

oops

jolly parrotBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

sharp smelt
#

Contradiction

#

actually, I'm not too sure

lilac jackal
#

a drawing may help

sharp smelt
#

hmm

#

We have $\abs{a_n} -\abs{a}< \varepsilon$

jolly parrotBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

sharp smelt
#

I let $\varepsilon = \abs{a}$

jolly parrotBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

lilac jackal
#

bad use of reverse triangle but ok choice of e

sharp smelt
#

$\abs{a_n - a} < \varepsilon$
This means $a_n<0$, which isn't possible

jolly parrotBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

lilac jackal
#

exactly how do u get a_n<0

sharp smelt
#

one minute

#

made a mistake

#

okay, so $\varepsilon = \abs{a}$

jolly parrotBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

sharp smelt
#

so $\abs{a_n - a} < \abs{a}$

jolly parrotBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

sharp smelt
jolly parrotBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

lilac jackal
#

thats not clear

sharp smelt
#

hmm

sharp smelt
#

no

#

for all n greater than a certain N in n

lilac jackal
#

good

#

now directly show this implies a_n<0

sharp smelt
#

so $\abs{a_n-a}<\abs{a}$
a_n^2+a^2-2aa_n<a^2 \implies $a_n(a_n-2a)<0$. So $a_n<2a$ and $a_n<0$

jolly parrotBOT
#

What a wonderful world !
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

lilac jackal
#

that looks complicated and probably wrong

#

yeah i dont believe the last step

#

redo n think simpler

sharp smelt
#

I mean one way is $a_n-a<-a$

jolly parrotBOT
#

What a wonderful world !

sharp smelt
#

that's one case

#

so a_n<0

lilac jackal
#

its not a case

#

its just true

sharp smelt
#

okie

#

got it

#

thanks

lilac jackal
#

np!

sharp smelt
#

.close

pearl pondBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sharp smelt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

pearl pondBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

midnight haven
pearl pondBOT
midnight haven
#

to find the other roots

#

what i did

#

is i found the conjugate

#

and multiplied it with the normal thingy

#

then divided the answer of multiplication with the original equation

#

is this correct?

fickle schooner
#

Yep

midnight haven
#

but what is he doing here

#

x- whatever

compact ridge
midnight haven
#

where did he get that from

compact ridge
#

yeah then you just divide the quartic by x^2 + 2x + 3

fickle schooner
#

Is that not what you did?

midnight haven
#

im confused on where x- (-1 +square root of 2) came from

#

where did x- come from

compact ridge
jolly parrotBOT
compact ridge
#

say if 3, 5 were the roots of a quadratic

#

the quadratic would be y = a * (x - 3)(x - 5)
a being some real number: this is the root form of a quadratic

fickle schooner
#

You can decompose a polynomial into a product of its linear factors

#

Yh

#

Wait, that's a tautology

midnight haven
#

why did we add this to the multiplication

fickle schooner
#

In south's example

#

If you had a quadratic $x^2 + 5x + 6$ and decided to factorize it: you get $(x + 3)(x + 2)$

jolly parrotBOT
#

StrangeQuarkAL

midnight haven
#

right

fickle schooner
#

the roots of that quadratic are -3 and -2

#

$(x - (-3))(x - (-2))$

jolly parrotBOT
#

StrangeQuarkAL

fickle schooner
#

See how I've decomposed the quadratic as a product of linear factors?

midnight haven
#

yea

fickle schooner
#

Same thing here

$P(x) = x^4 + ...$
It is a quartic so it has 4 roots

$P(x) = (x - a)(x - b)(x - c)(x - d)$

jolly parrotBOT
#

StrangeQuarkAL

fickle schooner
#

where a, b, c and d are the roots

midnight haven
#

i dont really understand but since my exam is tomorrow should i just do x-(z) * x-(z conjugate) to any similar questions?

fickle schooner
#

Technically yes but it's important to understand this and it's a little nuanced than that

#

Lemme at least finish my explanation

midnight haven
#

alright sure

fickle schooner
fickle schooner
#

Good

#

So my decomposition makes sense too?

#

P(x) = (x - a)...

midnight haven
#

oh

#

yea i see it

#

wait let me see another question

fickle schooner
#

Alright

midnight haven
#

yup makes sense

#

thanks

#

.close

pearl pondBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @mint glade

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

fickle schooner
#

Epic

pearl pondBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lucid moth
pearl pondBOT
lucid moth
#

part (d)

#

None of the previous parts a b and c are important, except for this bit

compact ridge
#

the slope m = tan(theta)

lucid moth
#

Doesnt the fact that its a point of inflection tell us that the slope is just -1?

lucid moth
lucid moth
#

I mean the slope of the point of inflection

spare lark
lucid moth
lucid moth
#

We can see an example in this graph

spare lark
#

But its not linked to -1

#

Its link to its sign

compact ridge
#

and the slope can be positive too at a point of inflection

lucid moth
compact ridge
#

yeah the slope can be anything, including 0

spare lark
compact ridge
#

(think of y = x^3 for the slope being 0)

lucid moth
spare lark
#

You can make a sign chart of your second derivative and see where it change sign

#

Mb

lucid moth
spare lark
#

Didn't see you was at (d)

compact ridge
#

so for the tangent line

#

that's how tan theta appears

spare lark
#

Just as an example

lucid moth
spare lark
#

We do it way before second derivative and all this stuff kekw

#

For solving inequality mostly

lucid moth
compact ridge
lucid moth
spare lark
#

Ic

compact ridge
#

f'(pi/8) is not an angle

#

a slope is not an angle

lucid moth
#

Then add 45 degrees

compact ridge
lucid moth
#

But I guess thats wrong too

compact ridge
#

just look at the diagram

#

also just to make sure we're on the same page, you want the angle between the tangnet line and the y-axis

lucid moth
#

Ah so we take our answer from the arctan away from 180 degrees?

compact ridge
#

so arctan(-2) is negative right?

lucid moth
#

Yes

#

-63 degrees

compact ridge
#

okay what's the green angle then?

lucid moth
#

Is -2 the slope?

compact ridge
lucid moth
#

I thought that arctan(-2) would give us this angle

compact ridge
lucid moth
#

The angle between the x axis and the slope

compact ridge
#

arctan always returns an angle in either the 1st or the 4th quadrants

lucid moth
#

Ok good rule im adding that to my notes haha

compact ridge
#

yes pls, it's super important

#

intuitively you can see that that obtuse angle can't possibly be 63 deg

lucid moth
#

And we know whether its the 1st or 4th by its sign right?

lucid moth
#

Okokok, got it

#

So its 90 degrees takeaway arctan(-2), right?

compact ridge
#

cause arctan(-2) is negative, we need to negate it to make the angle positive again

lucid moth
#

Ahh yeye

compact ridge
#

so -1 * arctan(-2), that's actually arctan(2)

#

90 - arctan(2), there you go, yes

lucid moth
#

Okkkk

#

I understand now

#

Which is 90 - 63 = 26 degrees

#

27, whatever šŸ˜

#

I get the method thats the most important hehe

#

Thank you everyone!

#

ā¤ļø

#

.close

pearl pondBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lucid moth

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

naive dirge
#

You guys

pearl pondBOT
naive dirge
#

Better explain

#

It

#

Explain why continuous value means I have to encode it with numbers

#

Or face the wrath of a loyal servant of Mickey Mouse

#

Choose wisely

toxic lichen
#

this is quite the combative tone from you

hazy pilot
#

I'd suggest watching the entire video

#

maybe he explains why in a later part

naive dirge
autumn fossil
#

firstly, you must always change a whole letter. You cant change 1/2 or 1/10th of a letter

primal blade
#

Yeah letters are quantised šŸ˜‚

autumn fossil
#

and you will probably want words like "large" and "big" to be close together, because they have similar meanings

#

im pretty sure that 3b1b makes this point somewhere in the vid

#

so just keep watching

pearl pondBOT
#

@naive dirge Has your question been resolved?

pearl pondBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

brazen swift
pearl pondBOT
brazen swift
#

C.) The length of the median to side CD in Triangle ACD is 22.44 . find k

languid goblet
#

we would appreciate if its english

brazen swift
#

took me a bit to type

dapper kraken
#

could you translate it?

pearl pondBOT
#

@brazen swift Has your question been resolved?

brazen swift
#

but sure ill translate all of it

#

Points A , B , C , D are on the Parameter of a circle. Given:
AB || CD , <Bad = α , <CAD = 20 , AE = k
A. 1) Express using α the angles of triangle ACE
2) Express with k and α the length of sides CD & AB
B) Given: Surface of triangle ABE is 6.41147 times bigger than the Surface of triangle CDE. Given: α >20 , calculate α .
**C.) The length of the median to side CD in Triangle ACD is 22.44 . find k **

I'm stuck on C)

brazen swift
pearl pondBOT
#

@brazen swift Has your question been resolved?

brazen swift
#

<@&286206848099549185>

dapper kraken
#

oh wait sorry i forgot about this

dapper kraken
# brazen swift https://i.imgur.com/ESpyL08.png

ok i think the idea is with B and law of sines, you can find the ratio of AC and CD, and you know AC^2+(CD/2)^2-ACƗCDƗcos(110)=22.44^2, so you can combine them to get a value of AC and CD, then you can use law of cosines to find AD

#

(hopefully you can ise a calculator for this)

brazen swift
#

yeah i can

pearl pondBOT
#

@brazen swift Has your question been resolved?

pearl pondBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @brazen swift

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

jolly geyser
#

how did they also get 129?

pearl pondBOT
snow sail
#

you can get one from the other by reflection

#

,calc 180-51

jolly parrotBOT
#

Result:

129
cobalt hinge
jolly geyser
#

is it that thing with the quadrants

#

cast diagrams

pearl pondBOT
#

@jolly geyser Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @jolly geyser

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

pallid kestrel
#

Wait guys so in trigonometry 1 is sinx square plus cosx square but what is -1 is it (1.-1) so [(-1).(sin2 + cos2)] sorry for the simple question I'm going over trigonometry again

autumn fossil
pallid kestrel
#

Thanks alot 😃

autumn fossil
#

if you multiplied it by 2, it would still be valid

#

2 = 2sin^2(x) + 2cos^2(x)

#

if you added -2 to both sides, it would again be valid

pallid kestrel
#

Oh yeah

autumn fossil
#

-1 = sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) - 2

pallid kestrel
#

-2?

#

Oh I get it

autumn fossil
#

the point is that you can do almost anything to both sides and it will remain valid

pallid kestrel
#

Thanks alot for the detailed explanation

#

Have a great day

autumn fossil
#

you too :)

pallid kestrel
#

.close

pearl pondBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @pallid kestrel

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

pearl pondBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

next forum
#

hey guys, i ran this through a calculator, i multiplied each anser choice by the denominators conjugate on top and bottom and didnt get anything. do i multiply the tops conjugate by the top, and the bottom's conjugate by the bottom or is there smth im missing?

next forum
#

please ping me if you respond :3

terse tartan
#

Have you rationalised the denominator?

hazy crypt
#

i multiplied each anser choice by the denominators conjugate on top and bottom and didnt get anything.

do this to the original expression instead of each of the answer choices

autumn fossil
#

oh, yeah, you gotta do it to the original expression

hazy crypt
#

@next forum

terse tartan
#

It's (2sqrtx +3)Ɨ(sqrtx)/4x-9

next forum
celest cedar
next forum
#

so my ork is pretty irrelevent

next forum
next forum
#

sorry about my keys messing uo

celest cedar
#

$(a + b) \cdot (a - b) = a^2 - b^2$

jolly parrotBOT
#

SLANDER

celest cedar
#

When you divide by a number, multiply by itself.

next forum
#

i think i may actually have a better lead elsehere
thank you for hel;ing me out as much as you did though

#

have a good day guyss!

#

.close

pearl pondBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @next forum

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cobalt hinge
pearl pondBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

iron karma
#

question is to find the maclaurin series - how on earth is this right? isn't f(0) undefined?

west sapphire
#

presumably they're filling in the gap at x=0 by setting f(0) = log(1) = 0

iron karma
#

i mean i guess but let's say they didn't do that, would the expansion exist?

west sapphire
#

no, you have to have f and its derivatives defined at x=0 in order to define the maclaurin series

dawn dirge
#

It is undefined but we know that $$ \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{\sin x}{x} = 1$$, and since $\log$ is continuous, the limit of $f$ as $x \to 0$ is $\log 1 = 0$

jolly parrotBOT
#

elliot

dawn dirge
#

Sorry should say $x \to 0$ in the limit

jolly parrotBOT
#

elliot

iron karma
#

right yeah, thats why f(0)=0 is a good like 'fix' to fix the discontinuity

#

but then when trying to find f' f'' etc given f(0)=0 let's assume (as this isn't in the question), the same thing ends up happening again and again

#

where the derivative DNE but you can find some sort of 'this would make sense as a fix' value

west sapphire
#

yep you're gonna have to do more work to show that the values given by the coefficients are consistent with the derivatives of f (with the gap at x=0 plugged in)

dawn dirge
#

It’s not even a ā€˜fix’ really, it’s just the limit as x approaches 0, but you can think about it that way. You will just have to figure out the derivative as normal and figure out what happens near 0 in the limit, similar to above

#

That’s when you can use e.g. L’HĆ“pital’s rule

iron karma
#

am i wrong to say that the expansion DNE without defining f(0) like that? or am i misunderstanding something else

west sapphire
#

correct, the expansion DNE if f(0) is not defined

#

clearly f(0) has to be 0 in order to make f continuous

#

you have to do more work to show that this also makes it differentiable (at least 4 times) in order to verify the formula

pearl pondBOT
#

@iron karma Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @iron karma

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

glass jungle
pearl pondBOT
glass jungle
#

I don’t know what to multiply the equation by?

celest cedar
#

What's the question?

glass jungle
#

Solve for X.

celest cedar
#

$a^2 - b^2 = (a+b)(a-b)$

jolly parrotBOT
#

SLANDER

glass jungle
#

I need to multiply the equation by a common factor from the denominator but how here?

celest cedar
#

$a^2 + a = a (a + 1)$

jolly parrotBOT
#

SLANDER

untold zephyr
#

Hint: $x^2$ and $1$ are both squares, so apply the above identity

jolly parrotBOT
#

Oliver

untold zephyr
#

See if you can spot a common denominator then

glass jungle
#

The left side is (X+/-1) but I don’t know about the right side.

untold zephyr
celest cedar
#

Try to find common denominator, and it would be x + 1 because of 7/(x+1)

glass jungle
#

What about the other right side term?

untold zephyr
#

Can you factorise that denominator as well?

#

The 2 coefficiets share a common variable

celest cedar
glass jungle
#

Is it X (X+1)(x-1)?

celest cedar
#

$x^2 - 1^2 = ?$

jolly parrotBOT
#

SLANDER

celest cedar
#

$x^2 + x = ?$

jolly parrotBOT
#

SLANDER

celest cedar
#

Factorise or simplify these parts

glass jungle
celest cedar
#

simplify not solve

#

Or Factorise

glass jungle
#

(X-1)^2

celest cedar
glass jungle
celest cedar
celest cedar
glass jungle
#

And that’s for the second one?

celest cedar
#

4/(x² + x)

glass jungle
celest cedar
#

U have a² - b² not (a - b)²

#

$a^2 - b^2 \neq (a - b)^2$

jolly parrotBOT
#

SLANDER

celest cedar
#

a = x
and
b = 1

glass jungle
celest cedar
glass jungle
#

Would I multiply the equation by x(x+1)(x-1)?

celest cedar
#

Owh no

#

By ur common denominator

#

x + 1

glass jungle
#

The entire thing?

celest cedar
#

Factorise all denominatores so u can see x + 1, then multiply by it

glass jungle
celest cedar
#

$x^2 - 1 = (x + 1) (x - 1)$

jolly parrotBOT
#

SLANDER

glass jungle
#

Why can’t I add an extra X at front to rid the X squares?

celest cedar
#

U have x² - 1 not x²

#

When you multiply by a number, you multiply the whole operation.

glass jungle
#

I’m aware.

celest cedar
#

Hmm

celest cedar
glass jungle
#

?

#

I have the answer key.

celest cedar
#

$\frac{4x + 1}{x^2 - 1} = \frac{7}{x+1} + \frac{4}{x(x+1)}$

jolly parrotBOT
#

SLANDER

celest cedar
#

$\frac{4x + 1}{x^2 - 1} = \frac{7x}{x(x+1)} + \frac{4}{x(x+1)}$

jolly parrotBOT
#

SLANDER

glass jungle
#

That’s wrong.

#

The answer key says I have to multiply by x(x-1)(x+1).

celest cedar
celest cedar
glass jungle
#

But how with the sqaures on the demo?

#

?

#

??

#

āŒ

celest cedar
#

$\frac{4x + 1}{(x+1)(x-1)} = \frac{7x}{x(x+1)} + \frac{4}{x(x+1)}$

jolly parrotBOT
#

SLANDER

celest cedar
#

@glass jungle

glass jungle
#

There isn’t an extra X under the 7x

glass jungle
celest cedar
celest cedar
glass jungle
#

Yeah I see it

celest cedar
glass jungle
#

I’m stuck

celest cedar
glass jungle
#

We’ve never done delta. This is algebra 2.

celest cedar
#

Something like b² - 4ac

glass jungle
#

DISCRIMMINANT

celest cedar
#

Use it

glass jungle
#

THAT IS FOR FIDNING DISCRIMINANT

#

Sorry autocorrect messed up the sentence

#

64

celest cedar
#

Get solutions x1 and x2

plain finch
#

what's the fucking delta, it's called discriminant

celest cedar
glass jungle
#

.close

pearl pondBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @glass jungle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

pearl pondBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

gleaming nebula
#

Im supposed to determine 2 equations relating to this sine wave, I know how to find amplitude and vertical phase shift, but because the x intercepts are equitidistant from the origin, how do I know which way it shifted horizontally?

gleaming nebula
#

2 equations in the form y = asin[b(x-c)]+d where a > 0 and another equation where a < 0