#help-39
1 messages · Page 221 of 1
okay okay
wait hang on
i did BA/AC = 10/CX
so then i cross mutliplied
then i got 15CX = 10x10
CX = 6.6666
what did i do wrong
Yeah it’s alright do u understand it from here?
yes!
That’s great 😃
wait how is BC isos
i thought just BA was 15
and only AX and AX were isos
Bac is isosceles
Because both angles a and c are 80
yep yep sorry
U have to prove that they’re both isosceles until u cnan know they are similar
Because u can then use aaa similarity
That’s right I think
yess it is
i checked with textbook
thank you so much orange!!!
i understand it so much now
Alright that’s great good luck 😊
.close
Closed by @rigid geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So, I've just written down this rule, but I don't understand it at all. What is it supposed to mean?
||Sub-question. Please, rate the comprehensibility of my hand writing from 1 to 10. Didn't try my best, just wondering||
to factorize an expression, number, or whatever else means to write it as a product of two or more things.
does it mean like
and your handwriting is like an 8. solid but could use a bit of aesthetic improvement
When we factorise x^2-5x+6
We get (x-3)(x-2)
So if we mutiply it we get the original expression?
@lunar cobalt this isn't really a rule btw more of an explanation for what the word "factor" means
Ann what I said is right?
Could you give me an equation to this?
Because word explanations don't seem to penetrate me 😅
I wanna see if what I said was correct or wrong
This
???
sorry, but in math you WILL have to deal with words
Bruh ann ignoring me
one way or another
This
Wow amazing frfr
So, it essentially says that
6/3 = 2
2 × 3 = 6
?
Is this what the thing's referring to?
It's rewriting the expression as the multiplication of two or more other Expressions
wym "like"
that's exactly what it is
Thanks
Ah
@lunar cobalt ask here
I think I understand
Don't make another help channel
So it essentially says "so, you have the number 10. Did you know you could view it as 2 times 5? Well, now you know it"
😂 we always get caught for the improper wording! It’s how we explain things
Yes
Anyway since you've created https://discord.com/channels/268882317391429632/1018700472988749904
You can either close this channel and use that
Or vice versa
.close
Closed by @lunar cobalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me complete this induction proof?
@midnight haven Has your question been resolved?
@midnight haven Has your question been resolved?
@midnight haven Has your question been resolved?
If $d = l$, \
$\Sigma_{i=0}^l\frac{i+l-l}{i!}\cdot l! \ =\Sigma_{i=0}^l\frac{i!}{i!}\cdot l! \ =\Sigma_{i=0}^ll! \ = l\ l!$ \
How did you get $\frac{(2l)!}{l}$?
Suika
wolfram alpha told me
but why would you substitute d with l?
you know the last one is a 1 and not l right?
Didn't you write d = l?
no
d=1
yea
Now it makes more sense
I am struggling what to do after applying induction hypothesis
Or maybe proving this would be simpler? This I got from factoring out d! and then i basically do an induction proof over just the sum to later substituting it back
The same thing a woman has to do to prove it
crazy bro
@midnight haven has your problem been resolved if so type .close
it hasnt
<@&286206848099549185>
@midnight haven Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lusty folio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ive been on this for the last 10 mins can't figure put what im doing wrong
whats the orig ques?
@simple eagle Has your question been resolved?
24
,rccw
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
the formula seems correct to me, prolly some calculation mistake
4
Okayu
.close
Closed by @simple eagle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Is the answer option4 @simple eagle
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the diffrence of Homoegnous/Non Homogenouse and Linear/Nonlinear Boundary conditions? If im writing a math papper on how fourier series and seperation of variables can be used for the 1d heat equation, what should i pick? Im still very new to this topic
Homogenous B.C.s are equal to zero. So if u(0,t) = 0, u(L,t) = 0, the B.C.s are homogenous. You can solve inhomogenous BCs but its not as straightforward as directly applying a seperation of variables
linear/nonlinear is a vague term.
I would start with solving the (homomogenous) neumann heat equation with no heat generation or absorption. homogenous neumann means the ends are at 0 degrees
What would linear and non linear look like ? And could it be applied to the Dirchlet, Neumann and Robin boundaries??
you might have a nonlinear/linear PDE, not BCs
"nonlinear/linear" BCs are a vague term that isn't really important/common
linear PDE means that the function and its derivatives only appear in the first degree, and are not multiplied by each other. so no u^2, (u_x)^2, u_x*u_t, etc
Ya its probably that applied to the Neumann Dirchlet and Robin etc
a nonlinearr PDE can have homogenous/inhomogenous bcs, those are two seperate subjects
the heat equation is linear, for example
nonlinear PDEs are very hard to solve analytically, or to prove E&U
Idk what your paper's on but unless you want a fields medal just stick to linear, homogenous PDEs with homogenous BCs. You can add some spice to it by including heat generation/inhomogenous BCs but you should stick to your standard linear PDEs (heat, wave, lapalce, etc(
@quiet reef Has your question been resolved?
@quiet reef Has your question been resolved?
i was thinking of something like this
.close
Closed by @quiet reef
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
not really a questions specific
but I wanna know, how discrete mathematics is related to computer science
how can discrete maths be useful
computers are all about 1s and 0s
hmm
and?
isn't computer related to digital logic?
oh
digital logic is from discrete maths
but the only few things that are useful in computers are just like, and, or, not, and basically anything can be made
how does more in depth discrete maths correlate to computer science.
discrete math is such a huge topic. basically anything to do with finite amounts of things is in some way discrete math
discrete math is not solving riddles
most things computers do is discrete math. from sorting stuff to planning your travel route to encrypting your data
🤔
sorting stuff
how
is related to discrete maths
cuz till now I only know that there is something called big O for efficiency of sorting algorithms and different type of sorts there is.
how does discrete maths relate
so basically in discrete maths term
big o is belong to Discrete maths
alright, how will knowing proofs n stuff, help with improving programming in the future
for example it will be good to know that the program actually does what you hope it does
there are ways to prove that it does
Closed by @pure sail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need to simplify this to just a voltage source in series with a resistor using source transformation
I was able to simplifiy a bit but I’m stuck
Please ping if you reply
@dire swift Has your question been resolved?
@dire swift Has your question been resolved?
!close
Closed by @dire swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\frac{dy}{dx} = -6sin(2x)cos^2(2x)$
Yousif
ok a and b dont have anything to do w each other but at least you did give the full thing for part b
you need to find the integral of cos^3(2x) and they nudge you in the right direction
$\int (1-\sin^2(2x)) \cos(2x) \dd{x}$ can be done with the substitution $u := \sin(2x)$
ya ik but like
Ann
how so?
for a moment, lets consider 2x = k
you get cos^3(k)
so cos^2(k)*cos(k)
hence (1-sin^2(k))*cos(k)
now plug back 2x
ahh
okok
that makes sense
now uh
in terms of the integral
do we have to differentiate
and go from there
this
$\int (1-u^2)cos(2x) ,dx$
Yousif
$\frac{du}{dx} = 2\sin^2(2x)\cos(2x) \ du=2\sin^2(2x)\cos(2x) \cdot dx \ dx = \frac{du}{2\sin^2(2x)\cos(2x)}$
correct?
Yousif
if u = sin(2x) then
du / dx = 2cos(2x)
yeah i fixed it now dw
Yousif
@jovial kiln
yes
now i integrate or?
integrate
$\int (u-\frac{u^3}{3}) ,\frac{du}{2}$
Yousif
.close
Closed by @peak prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So i got A(2/1) and B(1/3)
So AB vector is (-1/2)
but if i wanna calculate the coordinates of the middle of the vector AB
can i just do (-1/2) * 0,5
sorry bruder
Idt so
You should just do the mean between A and B components
what so 1,5/2
Ye
alternatively OA+1/2*AB works too
Yes
but what am i calculating when i do 1/2 * AB
The vector from A to midpoint of AB
But since A isn't the origin
You have to add OA
Where O is the origin
the origin is always (0,0)
yeah
but the vector starts at (2,1)
ok wait let me try to imagine it
but how is the origin relevant
u can place vectors anywhere right
Cuz you're in a space given two basis vector that allow you to have coordinates
yeah
I don't get what you mean by u can place vector anywhere
yeah and when u do that u start at A right
No "start" is (0,0)
To get your midpoint
You do half of the vector
On this i agree
But since you start at 0,0
You first need to go to A
Which is represented by adding OA
And so you have OA + 1/2AB
In coordinates
Which is the easier way to do
ill just memorize this
Think of it as mean of coordinates
yeah
ngl vectors have been confusing me alot
3b1b "essence of linear algebra" playlist is really good
to find the coordinates of the midpoint of a line passing through A and B, i would have just done it like this - M (the midpoint) =((x1+x2)/2, (y1+y2)/2) where x1 is the x-coordinate of point A and x2 is the x-coordinate of point B, and similarly, y1 would be the y-coordinate of point A and y2 the y-coordinate of point B.
so vector AB has the endpoints A and B and to find the midpoint you can simply use the coordinates of A and B to find it. however i am not sure if i understood your question correctly, but this would be my guess to find the coordinates of a midpoint.
ok tysm another question
was ist deine frage
Spezi
punkte sind A(1/-2/1) B(4/-1/6) C(7/-2/k) D(4/-3/3)
ich k so haben
dass sich ein parallelogram bildet
also AB = DC
(7,-2,k)-(4,-3,3)
was ergibt das in einem
System of eqn and equality of vector
sorry ill talk in english from now on
your law
I understand german dw
😭
er ist ein franzose
CD ist der gegenvektor von DC oder
könnte man sich nicht einbilden dass man bei B anfängt
und dann halt BA und CD hat
Putting a - both sides would change nothing to result yeah
stellen sie die beiden diagonalen des parallelogramms ABCD als linearkombination der vektoren a und b dar
ok
wait man fuck
im so confused
please wait a second
this is how the parallelogrma looks right
,rccw
yes
Ofc its not the same figure
No
this goes from C to D
so how do i know in what corners the points are
that depends on the specific coordinates
you know AB = CD wo what you have works
wdym
kannst du nochmal die aufgabe senden
,rccw
das hast du vorher iwie hergeleitet
mach eine ungefähre skizze
so sieht das ding ungefähr im raum aus
aber woher weißt du das
hab ich zeit überhaupt für die skizze
oder egal
ja ich zähl halt
beschrifte halt die achsen mit zahlen
A heißt 1 entlang x, -2 entlang y und 1 entlang z
dann wird doch B entlang x-Achse und z-Achse weiter weg sein
usw
hat 20sek oder so gedauer
wie mache ich die b)
übringes da stand a und b nicht A und B sportsfreund
a und b spannen diese ebene auf
also existiert eine linearkombination für den roten vektor aus grün und blau
du weißt btw dass AB = DC ist
es ist nur vektoraddition
ja
du willst ja entlang blau gehen und dann entlang grün
ja
also ist die linear kombination a+b
ja genau
hä ok
mitte?
@daring bay Has your question been resolved?
also die diagonale
ja was jetzt diagonale oder mittelpunkt
ich habs erklärt gehe jetzt pennen
@daring bay Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @daring bay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(5a - 6) - (9a+8)
My answer was = 4a - 14
Somehow this answer was incorrect on the test and the teacher marked it but didn't tell me what I got wrong
Firstly, open the brackets.
5a-9a=-4a
can someone explain
$(5a - 6) - (9a + 8) = 5a - 6 - 9a - 8 = 5a - 9a - 6 - 8$
SELVATOR
I removed the brackets
what did I get wronge
I got = 5a -9a =4a
=-6-8=14
= 4a -14
yes
$0 - 1 = -1$
SELVATOR
$1 - 2 = -1$
SELVATOR
$5 - 9 = -4$
SELVATOR
$5a - 9a = -4a$
SELVATOR
I got 5a -9a =4a
o i see I didn't put -4a
wair
wait
thats the answer ?
@orchid heath
$-4a - 14$
SELVATOR
Remember to open brackets and be careful about -
dam the teacher gave me 0/4
-( 5 - 3) = -5 + 3
Ehm... sign changes a lot
wow
-5 apples is not 5 apples
yes
what if you had a million dollars vs negative 1 million dollars
I forgot the sign
@manic cape Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Problem 28
Am I able to do DCT for both the absolute value part and the non absolute value part? For example I’m comparing the original thing against 1/2n and the both converge to 0
Absolute value of it and the
Non abs
Does that makes sense idk
this doesn’t matter
if a series converges absolutely then it converges
$\sum a_n \leq \sum |a_n|$
knief
so if |a_n| converges then so does a_n
Closed by @torpid schooner
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Closed by @torpid schooner
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
For problem 31, shouldn’t this be absolutely convergent?
Because you’re essentially taking the limit of 1/ln(x) to infinity
Which is 0
lim -> 0 is not a sufficient condition, but a necessary one
Could you explain?
assume we have sum(an) and we want to study its convergence
Ok
if an -> 0, that doesn't mean sum(an) is convergent
but
if sum(an) is convergent, then necessarily an -> 0
Okay, what would be sufficient in this case then? How would I check for its convergence
there are many ways to do this, do you understand french ?
No sorry
@torpid schooner Has your question been resolved?
This only proves the terms go to zero, not that the sum of the terms go to zero. They are two different things
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Well, for the alternating series test, the series needs to decrease and the limit needs to tend to 0 in order to converge correct? 1/ln(x) decreases and it goes to 0 if the limit gies to inf
But then again 1/n would be divergent
So idk what I’m talking about
Im just saying my thoughts
.close
Closed by @torpid schooner
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Because it alternates
That's what you're missing here
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
i do not understand a single thing
all i know is we use hook's law and the fact that the sum of all forces is equal to mass * acceleration
@full pine Has your question been resolved?
t = 0.224s?
@full pine Has your question been resolved?
how
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for question 1 a (i), why is -2<x<-1 a solution?
I don't quite understand the stuff you have written on the right. Can you explain what you did there?
well, it looks like he wrote out the sign of each factor separately
but then came up short in putting all that together
so for each x value that made f’(x) = 12(x+1)(x-2)(x+2) equal to 0, i made three separate piecewise thingos to show like the increasing, decreasing, and stationary points of f(x)
yeah i suspect thats where the error arose
right, but the casework is showing the behavior of (x-2), (x+2), (x+1) separately, you would have to put those cases together in order to obtain the behavious of f'(x)
ohh
I suggest looking at intervals where behavior changes: say from -infinity to -2, -2 to -1, -1 to 2, and 2 to infinity
Interval | x<-2 | -2<x<-1 | -1<x<2 | 2<x
---------+------+---------+--------+------
x+2 | - | + | + | +
x+1 | - | - | + | +
x-2 | - | - | - | +
---------+------+---------+--------+------
Product | | | |
make a sign table like this
ive deliberately left the "product" line empty for you to fill
that was typed up so fast 
it's a very basic ascii table
so it’s monotonically increasing at -2<x<-1 and x>2
does monotonically increasing mean only increasing between intervals?
I don't know if you were instructed to include endpoints like -2<=x<=-1 but that looks right
honestly "values of x where f(x) is monotonically increasing" is something I have never heard
I only ever used monotonically increasing as a property on all of the domain
nah i wasn’t
Do you perhaps have the definition for that?
nah i don’t think so
if u really want, i could show u my notes i took in class and u could see if anything answers ur questions?
yeah sure
that particular notation is uncommon i think
yeah that looks fine
I guess your teacher might have meant "increasing" instead of "monotonically increasing"
what does monotonically increasing mean
Adhering to your definition of increasing: Monotonically increasing means that whenever $x<y$, $f(x)<f(y)$
qwertytrewq
so you could imagine such a function to always be going upwards
then here would they mean that at, for example, x = 2, then the function would continue to increase beyond that point?
so basicallt just wherever the function is increasing
Well monotone increasing is really a property of the function at every point. It's hard to separate the points out.
But I guess you could say that... but if you use this, notice that when -2<x<-1, the function in your original question does not always increase beyond x.
oh yea true
so they just mistyped it or smth
So i think you should just interpret it as increasing at x
in particular, by your definition, this is just saying "find all point where f'(x)>0"
yea that makes sense
also
while i have my notes attached
the top right hand image
the one where it talks abt graphs of a function…
when f(x) is increasing, then f’(x) > 0
does that when the function is increasing, the gradient is icnreasing?
or actually
the gradient is positive?
it should really be "f(x) is increasing at x, then f'(x)>0"
because in the line above you pointed out "at a particular value x"
Oh are you asking the following:
if f(x) is monotone increasing, does that mean f'(x)>0 at every point?
no i’m asking:
if at a particular x value where f(x) is increasing, is the gradient at that x value positive?
i’m just trying to clarify what the sentence actually means
I believe that is how you defined it
ok just making sure
you should ask your teacher to be sure
For example: you can have $f(x)=\begin{cases} x-1 & x<0\ 0 & x=0\ x+1 &x>0\end{cases}$ and ask whether $f$ is increasing at $0$.
qwertytrewq
ok let me take a look
Well I suggest you to think about how the function behaves at each point x
pick a couple test points, say -2,-1,0,1,2,3 and try to answer how f(x) behaves
but by behaviour I don't mean figuring out what f is
but rather, think about the slope
For example: at x=-2, f'(x) is very very negative, that means that my function must be rapidly decreasing at x=-2
i thought the tangent would be positive at x=-2
since it’s increasing until x = 1
and then decreasing after that
I think you might be getting confused.
increasing at x means that f'(x)>0, but as you see, f'(x) is always negative
im so confused
In general, the more negative f'(x) is, the more the function dips, and conversely the more positive f'(x) is, the more the function increases
when u say f’(x) > 0, are u saying the gradient is positive or the whole function f’(x) is positive
when I say f'(x)>0 I am saying that at some value x, f'(x)>0
so the gradient is positive at some value x?
When the whole function f' is positive, it is usually denoted "f'>0", or "f'(x)>0 for all x"
ohhh
yeah
Let me give a clear and formal definition:
Given a function $f$,
\begin{itemize}
\item we say that $f$ is increasing at some point $x$ when $f'(x)$ exists and $f'(x)>0$
\item we say $f$ is decreasing at some point $x$ when $f'(x)$ exists and $f'(x)<0$
\item we say $f$ is stationary at some point $x$ when $f'(x)$ exists and $f'(x)=0$
\end{itemize}
ohhh
qwertytrewq
you should confirm with your teacher if this is correct, but let us work with this definition for now
If you want some practice:
Practice: Define the function $f(x)=\begin{cases} x-1 & x<0\ 0 & x=0\ x+1 &x>0\end{cases}$. For which $x$ is $f$ increasing, for which $x$ if $f$ decreasing, and for which $x$ is $f$ stationary?
yeah! however, remember that f'(x) is 0 somewhere
when x=1
so it is decreasing except at one point
qwertytrewq
oh wait so the graph is literally always decreasing excpet (1,-3)
when x = 0, f is stationary
when x is larger than 0, f is increasing
when x is less than 0, f is decreasing
Also note that there is a couple nice things, for nice functions like this:
\begin{itemize}
\item If $f'(x)>0$, then the function will look like it is ``increasing" near $x$ (this is an informal notion of increasing which I have not defined yet)
\item If $f'(x)<0$, then the function will look like it is ``decreasing" near $x$
\item Lastly if $f'(x)=0$, then the function will look ``flat" near $x$.
\end{itemize}
so if the gradient is less than 0, then the function at a particular x value will be decreasing AND flat?
or at least look like it’s decreasing and flat?
well I think you need to try and compute the derivative
oh wait mb mistyped
qwertytrewq
^this is the correct one
f'(x)=0 -> function will look flat near x
ah okay
here is an example: suppose that the red curve is the function. look at point A and point B
you can see that, if you zooom in, the function looks very flat at A, and B
yes
you will see that this seems to be the case
yes yes
when you zoom in at x=0, you realize that the function is increasing. And if you compute the derivative at 0, you will see that the derivative is 1, which is indeed >0
and so if the derivative is larger than 0, then the function at x=0 is increasing
yup, and it looks like it is increasing (intuitively), when you zoom in
yes
Now another fact that we need to know is that how ``big" f'(x) also matters
Do you know how f would behave at x if, say f'(x)=1? How about if f'(x)=6?
the gradient would be much steeper when f’(x) = 6 compared to f’(x) = 1
yeah!
in fact, if f'(x)=6, then when you zoom in very very close on the graph at x=6, it will look like a straight line with slope of 6
mmmm
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/n4gdaym8ar here is an example, try zooming in at (3,9)
in general, when you zoom into f at point x, it will look like a line with slope f'(x)
you should try graphing a couple of functions and see this for yourself
i will when i finish this
right so given these intuitions, and given the graph of f'(x)
can you figure out how f behaves at some test points?
say, how does f behave at x=-2, or x=2?
your graph here says its negative
just to be clear we are looking at the original question
tryna apply these key intuitions
oh wait
correct me if im wrong but
at x = -2
y would be very very negative right?
so that would mean the gradient is also ver very negative?
like y would have a very negative value
and so the gradient would be very steep and negative
precisely!
and the y value when x=-2 is precisely the value of f'(x)
(this is the definition of a graph)
yes
Ok
now maybe do a couple other points, once you have a rough idea of how the function behaves, you can sketch a graph
wouldn’t it just be the same graph as the derivative
but the stationary point is at 1,-3
cus even at x = 2
y is still negative
just less negative compared to x = -2
not really, you know that f' is decreasing at almost all the possible x's
but the derivative certainly is increasing from -infinity to 1
wait huh
so it’s increasing then decreasing?
the derivative function, f', is increasing then decreasing.
but the function f, as we previously deduced, is almost always decreasing
but there is a stationary point at x=1, as you discovered
if you have computed a couple values you will figure that ||f is decreasing less and less rapidly, until it becomes flat at x=1, then after 1, it starts to decrease more and more rapidly||
wait so like a cubic???
you could think of it that way, and in this case it is precisely a cubic.
However, there are functions that behaves like what I said, but is not a cubic
wait but if it’s a cubic, what would its y-int be?
you aren't supposed to know that (maybe later you will learn techniques on how to deduce what f is but don't worry about that for now). the question asks only for a sketch of the graph, so as long as you match the general behavior of the graph it's fine
if it is always decreasing then yeah, it will intersect x axis exactly once. In this special case, f is not decreasing at x=1. However, you can still prove that f intersect x axis exactly once.
Closed by @queen ice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
well, for everybody else's convenience
we left off on the question of whether f_3 is surjective
@pure sail do you think it is or do you think it isnt
it is surjective
why do you think so
cuz the input R+ cross R+ always have the output R+ and not complex
what does it mean for a function to be surjective?
no forget about proof
you need to be able to say the general definition of what it means for a function to be surjective
every element in R+ output, is associated with at least one R+ cross R+
I think
every element in codomain is associate with at least one element in domain
your wording is still kind of sloppy but better than before
so,
for your function to be surjective, each value in R+ has to be returned at least once by it.
but now think about the fact that f_3(a,b) is ceil(something).
ye
what do you know about the ceiling function? what kinds of values can it produce as output?
integers
right
rounded up
are there real numbers which aren't integers?
no
oh that's news
are there positive real numbers which aren't integers?
0.5
no
so is it surjective
for your function to be surjective, each value in R+ has to be returned at least once by it.
but we have just found that 0.5 is never returned, despite being in the codomain.
ohh
that makes sense
since R+ x R+, it will never return a value of decimal numbers which are included in R+ due to ceiling function
if I understand correctly, this^?
hm
I see
I just had to have found one counter example like 0.5 to prove that the function is not surjective?
ok thx
@pure sail Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pure sail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for Q2, why is y=0 and x=1 an asymptote
oh i see why x = 1 is an asymptote
wait y=0 isn’t an asymptote
then how would i draw this??
@queen ice Has your question been resolved?
(0, 0) is a solution
yea
@queen ice Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @queen ice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
assuming they dont switch midway (intersect so the upper becomes the lower and vice versa) you could just plug a value of x in the range of x values we're integrating over for both functions and see which function yields a larger y, thatll be the upper function
you could even just integrate it however you want and if the result is negative just flip the sign
you could do it if they intersected midway too but ypud have to get these intersection points (sey them equal to each other and solve for x) then test out the x values of each region post being split up(split jp by the intersection)
hi, i wanna know where can i get help for maths
oh right
Closed by @slate forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
number
- D
- D
!noping
Please do not ping individual helpers unprompted.
oops sorry
@urban gale Has your question been resolved?
@urban gale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
well yes
the inverse of an invertible map remains invertible
functions can be one to one and onto without same domain and codomain
the function f:{1,2,3}->{2,3,4} given by f(x) = x+1
is invertible
F^-1 is from V to U btw
$x \neq y$ implies $f(x)\neq f(y)$
00100000
onto: every element of the codomain is the image of someone
one-to-one: the image of a function and its domain are in one to one correspondance: same image means same input
equivalently this is also one-to-one
and for all y in the codomain, there exists some x s.t. $f(x)=y$
00100000
same image means same input (different input means different image)
if there is an invertible function in between a domain and codomain
they are indeed seen as the same size
that's how we define "same size" in set theory in fact for the cardinal
oh and also
funnily enough, for infinitely large sets, their "size" is actually characterized by bijective functions between them and other sets
I should add that "size" can have different meanings
two vector spaces can have same cardinal size, but not same dimension size
cardinal size is characterized by simple bijections
dimension size is characterized by isomorphisms (linear bijections)
haha u have very interesting equivalent definitions. i always think of it as "bijective means same cardinality," but of course the existence of a true inverse implies bijectivity
yeah
yeah in cardinal size that's an example of functions that don't have the same size
one is bigger because you can draw an injection from the first to the second
but there is no bijection
R_n[X] and R^(n+1)
the diagonalization argument is just a demonstration that the reals aren't of the same cardinality as the naturals
$\bR_n[X] =$ polynomials of degree $\le n$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
$\bR^{n+1} = {(x_1,...,x_{n+1})\mid x_i\in \bR}$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
woah u type latex fast
im starting to think that I'm just slow asf at latex lmaooo
when domain = codomain, a linear map is then called an "endomorphism"
we have a lot of theory regarding endomorphisms
love that word 😁
that we don't have with usual linear maps
first interesting thing you can do when domain = codomain
is composition
so for endomorphisms, you can give meaning to T^2, T^n,...
second interesting thing: in finite dimension
if you have a left inverse
then it will also be the right inverse
and vice versa
category theory territory 🤤🤤
oh, i never knew it was the case for finite dimensions only
very cool
Closed by @naive marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yeah, in the general case, left inverse <=> injective and right inverse <=> surjective or swap I don't remember
so in infinite dimensions, endomorphisms can be injective but not surjective, and vice versa
simple examples in $\bR [X]$ (set of all real polynomials)
rafilou is not not born in 2003
the derivative endomorphism is surjective but not injective
the integral endomorphism $f(P) = \int_0^xP(t)dt$ is injective but not surjective
rafilou is not not born in 2003
anyways channel close Imma stop yappin
lmao i appreciate the yap
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey
you want to prove convergence? I guess you can use convergence theorems
$\lim_{x\to \infty} \frac{(\ln x)^\alpha}{x^\beta} = 0$, $\alpha,\beta > 0$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
use this property to find a comparison with a known convergent integral
so the problem is
in this property, you can use any value of alpha, beta > 0
what you want to do is completely get rid of the ln(...) thing
but you want to use a beta small enough
so that what remains is enough to get convergence
so say x = 1+t^2 to save trouble
okay I see
$\frac{\ln (1+t^2)}{1+t^2} = \frac{\ln(1+t^2)}{(1+t^2)^\beta} \times \frac{1}{(1+t^2)^?}$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
we can take beta = 1/4?
yes
okay and it exists a moment where ln(1+t²)/(1+t²)^beta =< 1
and I just have to multiply by 1/(1+t²)^smth and it proves the convergence
right?
yeah it proves the convergence of the integral on [that moment,+infinity)
yes but there's no problem at 0 right?
so it proves the convergence
thank you!
.close
Closed by @swift pilot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Since the function f(x) = Sqrt(x^2 - (a + 1) - x + 9) defined on real numbers, what is the largest range of values of a?
the solution said since the inside is positive the delta must be lower than 0 nd i dont understand why?
$f(x)=\sqrt{x^2-(a+1)x+9}$
devthemasked
Is this the question?
They said that the function should be defined on all real numbers
but square roots are only defined for non-negative real numbers
e.g. sqrt(-1) is undefined
so we want that inside of the square root to be non-negative, otherwise the square root would be undefined
that means we want x^2 - (a+1)x + 9 to be positive
and it has to be positive for all values of x
*non-negative
positive or 0
I understand that what i dont understand is why b^2-4ac must be lower than 0
because if it had 2 roots, it would be negative between those 2 roots
ah ic
yeah, just moving towards that
so it must have either 0 or 1 root
yeah makes perfect sense
and that happens when the discriminant is <= 0
When D<0 aren't the roots imaginary?
Yeah, they are, but presumably we are working in reals
and if we are working in reals, we might as well say there are no roots
What would happen if we werent working in reels and instead in complex what would change from this answer?
in complex numbers, square root is always defined
so a could be anything
but the question itself mentions we're working in reals
even values which makes the b^2-4ac positive?
Yeah, sure
sqrt(25) = 5
that wouldnt change
complex numbers dont exclude reals
Gotcha

