#help-39
1 messages · Page 154 of 1
(with x >= 9)
ok
so their product
(x-1)(x-9)
is it gonna be greater than (or equal to) 0, or smaller?
greater than 0!
just a quick rule of thumb
a(x-x1)(x-x2)
is the sign of "a"
except between the roots
here you have 1(x-1)(x-9)
1 is positive (or non-negative if you care about greater or equal)
so (x-1)(x-9) is greater than equal to 0, except between the roots 1 and 9
(on your graph it would be "+ - +")
.close
Closed by @short orchid
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im so confused on mixtures
and ratinoal word problems
i really need someone to teach me it
@onyx helm Has your question been resolved?
Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing—and saving your progress—now: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/algebra-home/alg-basic-eq-ineq/alg-linear-equations-word-problems/v/mixture-problems-2
Mixture problems 2
Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/algebra/solving-linear-equations-and-inequalities/More-eq...
Closed by @onyx helm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can somebody explain why do get an orthogonal vector in cross products and what does that mean?
like dot product dhows how much the two vectors coincide right?
if A x B = C
then orthogonal means that C is perpendicular to A and B
similarly what does cross product signify?
it finds a vector perpendicular to the two vectors what are you confused about
it gives you a vector that is perpendicular to both your original vectors
only works in 3D
you can Google this stuff
i would say that its an operation that is just defined like that
and what exactly does that third vector do?
ex: in phy torque
we can:
- find the plane that contains any two vectors in 3D space
- find the shortest distance from a point to a plane
- find the intersection of two planes
and a lot of other stuff like this
yeah
there are many applications in physics as well
also the area of the parallelogram formed by the two original vectors
torque
.
is equivalent to the cross product
many angular stuff are defined using cross product
magnetism
how does area equate to a vector? like how does a 2d thing become a 1d thing?
yeah
wait! so we have two vectors r and p and cross multiplying them gives another vector L
the magnitude of the vector is the area
whihc is perpendicular to the previous ones
yes
how is angular momentum perpendicular to those two
you're missing the point, it's the length of the vector
its magnitude
not the vector itself
have you learnt rotation and all?
could you explain a little
if not then i dont think this is the right time
not even begun
imagine explaining exponents to someone who hasnt done multiplication
i was thinking of learning vectors first
then hopping onto phys
yk so that i could better understand the concepts
it’s defined that way, the moment arm or r vector is perpendicular to the linear momentum vector so that when you take the cross product you get angular momentum which is perpendicular to both
i would say just learn it now
learn the applications in phy later
bro if you are his secret twin
then why would you go around and tell everyone?
so how does that look like geometrically
like theres a circle
with radius r
is that for me
a bit
first learn about linear motion
then motion in 2d
work energy theorem
center of mass
then come to rotation
ok
but just help me with this one
sure if you want to think of it as rotating around a circular path
whats another way of thinking about it?
can you make a diagram?
of the third vector
think of it this way
things can rotate only 2 ways clock and anti-clock
now cross-product gives us perpendicular vector
so we just take its magnitude and sign
like one is +10 and one is -5
so net will be +5
we dont take direction into account other than sign
yeah i might have to do some physics first
lmao
but just make a diagram of how that looks like
i forgot how to find direction in cross product lol
lemme remeber
lol
yeah
why would torque be outside?
because cross product?
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @surreal sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yes instead of roots think of it as fractions then combine and solve
cotx^3/4 ?
crazy shit
good luck solving this integral @uncut timber
yea u can use u sub
not happening lol
what the fuck
cotx^3/4 = t
then
hmm
I don't think this is possible
its possible but I don't want to do this much work
oh wait the u sub doesnt work 😂
.close
Closed by @uncut timber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
that works for sqrt(cotx)
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was watching a lecture and I'm confused about what happened here
if this is by the assumption of x, that |x-c| < δ, then wouldn't 3|x-2| < δ? why is it 3δ?
Since we wanna pick a delta, so that |f(x)-L|<epsilon, therefore we can pick delta as epsilon/3 so that finally 3|x-2|<epsilon
not sure if this explains 🤔
I'm not sure if I get that 😭
how do we know that delta=epsilon/3 fulfilles 3|x-2|<epsilon
yay Denascite is here!
c=2. so |x-2| < delta is the assumption
and then the question is, what delta do we have to choose such that 3|x-2| is smaller than epsilon
and if |x-2| < delta, then multiplying both sides by 3 gives that 3|x-2| < 3 delta
so if we choose delta = epsilon/3, then 3 delta = epsilon
which makes 3|x-2| < epsilon
but 3|x-2| is just a simplification of f(x)-L, so why also multiply delta?
we have to show that if |x-2| < delta for some delta that we are allowed to choose, then |f(x)-L| < epsilon
that is the definition of continuity which we have to show here
Wait I think I got it, is this it?
yes
I'm so confused about the order of the work the professor is doing though
that seems like an observation I could only make working backwards, at what point am I supposed to catch this 😭
well solving things is not always the most straightforward thing
I guess I'm confused at what he's solving for
I thought we were proving that |f(x)-L|< epsilon, but he ends it with =epsilon so were we solving for what epsilon was??
he is trying to find a delta such that if |x-2| < delta, then |f(x)-L| < epsilon
why doesn't it end with =delta then?
if you read the whole inequality from beginning to start it says |f(x)-L| < epsilon
he is "solving" for delta in the sense that in the middle he realizes that if he chooses delta = epsilon/3, then the inequality works out
wait I think I'm kind of getting it
thank you for explaining 😭
have a good one
.close
Closed by @clear osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi guys any ideas how to do this limit where a is some constant
Is a constant?
Mb reading is not a skill I have 💀
lol
Can you use the formula
$$
\lim _{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{a^x-1}{x}=\ln (a)
$$
Alix
Have you tried taylor expansions?
[
e^{2ax} \approx 1 + 2ax + \frac{(2ax)^2}{2} + \dots
]
Alix
+O(x^3) but it vanishes as x->0
Also forget about this, it's way harder
@sonic rose you there?
[
1 - e^{2ax} \approx 1 - \left(1 + 2ax + \frac{(2ax)^2}{2}\right) = -2ax - 2a^2x^2 + O(x^3)
]
and
[
\left(1 - e^{2ax}\right)^2 \approx \left(-2ax - 2a^2x^2\right)^2 = (2ax)^2 + O(x^3) = 4a^2x^2 + O(x^3)
]
For the denominator
Alix
Like you do this again for the numerator and evaluate at zero and you are done
Well I am assuming you have seen taylor expansions
Have you? If you didn't then I guess we'll do something else, there is another method.
hi sorry was afk
So have you seen taylor expansions?
what in the world i wouldnt have thought of that
yes but we were never taught to use it in limits
did you see the O(x) notation?
wouldnt the 2nd degree approximation be not enough though, dont you need the full expasion?
No here it works
not sure what that is
It's a negligeable before x when x goes to 0
Meaning it decreases way faster than f(x)=x when x goes to 0 
i c
Here the rest of the expansion goes to 0 so fast compared to the beginning that they don't matter
let me try that then
@sonic rose Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sonic rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
^^
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don’t know the possible values of a
as in can someone help me work out the possible values of a?
What does it mean that the graph of y = f(x+a) passes through the origin?
If you plug in x=0, what should the value of y be?
it passes through the point 0,0
the value of y would be
12?
(0+3)(0-2)^2
@fathom oasis
If you plug in x=0 to y = f(x+a), you get 0=f(a)
I get it now thanks!
i’m confused now on this question…
question 8
is there a similar procedure
Not really
where should I start?
Consider the illustration of the graph of the function. You'd want point R to lie above the x axis and point Q to lie below the x axis. Then the function has three distinct real roots
yes
I understand that part
what’s next
Let g(x) = f(x)+a.
g(1) <= 0
g(-1) >= 0
Closed by @floral knot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
L'hospital twice?
French ?
,w L'hopital's rule
Still don t know how to do it
f(x) is the top function and g(x) is the bottom function
Alr
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm extremely puzzled here (this is geo A work)
why is A. incorrect? my teacher released our practice test answer keys to review and study, however A. is marked incorrect. i've recreated the rigid transformation so many times in so many ways and i still dont understand it
im genuinely thinking that it's an error from my teacher
It is
it's an error from my teacher?
Yes
Wait what
What if AB≠BD
Error from teacher probably
Imagine d was literally right next to B
huh
That's what I was thinking
Now I think I'm going crazy 😭😭
bro i understand nothing 😭
Ah right
Imagine u redrew the diagram so like D was right next to B
Can someone help me simplify trig expressions
New channel
im a visual learner 😭
vertical angles
👍
It is possible that the lengths are not equal
The arrow shows the location of the points after rotation by 180⁰
@hollow pond
my bad, i was checking something
i understand it now
your drawing was very helpful
Thank you
i didnt really understand why it was incorrect
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @hollow pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is problem 2 asking me to do?
Is it just telling me to find implicit differentiation
Like this
Sorry I’m kinda slow
Probably
For part a it's saying do it w implicit differentiation
For part b it's saying re arranged the equation to make y the subject and then differentiate
I think
And part c is make sure these r the same
I have no idea what this means LOL
sorry for late response
Could you clarify please
So for q 2
🙏
U wld write 6x to the four + y to the 5 equals 2x as 6x to the 4 - 2x = y to the 5
Then take the fifth root of both sides
And now u have y on one side
And x on the other
And then differentiate
And u shld get the same answer
Do I write it as $6x^4 + y^5 =2x \ as 6x^4-2x=y^5$
Bro what the flip
LOL
David
This
And then use implicit differentiation in the right
Equation
.close
Closed by @torpid schooner
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Can someone define explicit and implicit functions?
I mean
Implicit and explicit differentiations
Can someone give an example based off of this explanation
Explicit functions, those in the form y = f(x), you can differentiate “straight”, to dy/dx = f’(x)
Closed by @torpid schooner
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.,|+~*| X,@9/; Z,@9 ?49 Bro
It kept opening up the number section
Instead oof the word
Stupid keyboard phone
Not my fault
It’s keyboard fault
bots are out against you
keyboard killer
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this answer to this 2?
i think so but im not certain
use rank nullity theorem
The rank–nullity theorem is a theorem in linear algebra, which asserts:
the number of columns of a matrix M is the sum of the rank of M and the nullity of M; and
the dimension of the domain of a linear transformation f is the sum of the rank of f (the dimension of the image of f) and the nullity of f (the dimension of the kernel of f).
It follo...
Yes
Closed by @vivid pilot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@velvet wolf Has your question been resolved?
@velvet wolf Has your question been resolved?
@velvet wolf Has your question been resolved?
@velvet wolf Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ik how to do this q, i just want to ask what a triangular number is
the triangular numbers are the ones that follow the formula for Sn given there. They're called triangular because you can arrange the sum as a triangle
Closed by @sterile turtle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can I expain part b
$S_n = \frac{n}{2}(n+1)$
Sho
so the number will end in 4,9,5,0
4,9 for the n+1
5,0 for the n
is there a better way to explain this or nah
hmm i think there might be! if it's divisible by 5, either the n/2 term has to be a multiple of 5 or the n+1 term has to be a multiple of 5, so you just need to show what values of n work for either of those conditions
and likewise if it's even, at least n/2 or n+1 has to be a multiple of 2, so you could set up 2 equations to figure out which values of n work!
i can use thsi for the second one better, but the first one i just did like this
so
i said $\frac{n}{2}(n+1) = 2m$
Sho
then $n(n+1)=4m$
Sho
therefore n either has to be divisible by 4 or have a remainder of 3
ngl i hate these types of q
ah yes that works!
and if you wanted to use it to find which values of n make it divisible by 5, you just use the same logic but with a 5 instead of a 2
Closed by @sterile turtle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
would y_g = c1 (t) + c2 (t^2) + y_p, where y_p can be defined as t^3?
we're given t,t^2, t^3 are particular solutions
@abstract halo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone show how to arrive at that conclusion
What's statement II
its not gonna affect what i am asking
@rich jolt Has your question been resolved?
@rich jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I calculate this integral? The function is non elementary so I have to use a theorem instead
I dont think its integrable and the hint says to use a theorem instead
The only idea I had was Taylor approximating
I tried putting this in wolframalpha,first time I've seen it not be able to compute something
Said it needed more time, so yeah
Pretty sure you need a theorem
Yupp but no idea what theorem
The limit of the integrand to infinity is 2/pi, can I use a comparison test with that?
Yes I think comparison + squeeze
Does squeeze theorem apply for integrals
It applies for limits, which you have
Ah wait maybe I can use mean value theorem for integrals
Yeah I think mean value theorem is easiest. I guess we assume continuity and then we can take the limit of f(c)*(n+2-n) instead of the integral.
Where c is in [n, n+2],
Yeah thats a good idea
.close
Closed by @reef kestrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\int{\sec x(\sec x\tan x)}$
bush_tree_plant
If you let secx = t then we get sec^2x/2
on the other hand, if we let tanx = t, we get tan^2x/2
what is going on here?
are they the same thing?
krypton
@vapid bough Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vapid bough
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
140cos(a)+60cos(35+a)=160cos(a)
how would i get a here
is this in degrees or radians
Given the 35 + a it's most likely degrees
In either case the answer is the same
Apply the cos(a+b) identity to cos(35+a) and then isolate cos(a)
@lethal estuary Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lethal estuary
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I prove whether this integral converges/diverges?
If it has a diverging minorant, it diverges. If it has a converging majorant, it converges. Does this help?
Whats a minorant/majorant
Like another function that is in absolute value smaller or larger
Is it like supremum/infimum?
No, more like something that is smaller or equal to / greater or equal to, for all values of x.
But to be honest, I don’t know if the integral converges or diverges yet. This is just the way I would think about it
Ah okay so a comparison test right? I'm confused how to deal with it since its generalized
In the solution they first prove that the integral from 0 to pi converges, then they rewrite the integral as a series
So you have the solution to the problem already and are just trying to understand it
Yeah and looking for alternate solutions
If I was to solve it myself I wouldnt do it that way so im trying to understand how to think about these questions
I would just directly move to a comparison test, but this seems iffy since the function is not defined in infinitely many points when sin(x)=0 so I'm kind of stuck
Yeah I was actually thinking that the first question to attack would be this: Does the integral $\int_{\pi}^{2\pi} \frac{1}{x^2 |\sin x|^{1/2}} dx$ converge?
gautamdb
😅
Its generalized at pi and 2pi so we get two integrals to analyse right
Between pi and 3pi/2, and 3pi/2 to 2pi
What do you mean by „generalised“? The integrand approaches infinity, yes.
But why from pi to 3pi/2, and why from 3pi/2 to 2pi?
I mean, between pi and 2pi, the integrand is nonzero, I don’t get why you are trying to involve the midpoint 3pi/2
In that case we can set a limit as x approaches 2pi and pi
If we separate the integral
I think we should start by understanding the solution you have. After looking at the integral from 0 to pi, what i the next step there?
Also, is it clear to you how to prove that the integral from 0 to pi converges?
So first we prove that the integral from 0 to pi converges
Yup that proof is just using comparisons
So basically the idea is the same as what I said: You find a converging majorant.
But the details were complicated and I didn’t get it immediately
They look at these two integrals: Integral from 0 to pi/2, and from pi/2 to pi.
But you could as well have taken any other number in between other than pi/2
Only pi/2 is convenient because with the substitution t = pi - x you can make the second integral into the first
How does this help in proving the original integral converges? The bounds for integration are different
The original integral is split up into parts, integrating over k pi to (k+1) pi, for k from 1 to infinity
So you consider the integral from pi to 2pi, then from 2pi to 3pi, and so on.
Then you realise that for every integral from k pi to (k+1) pi, a majorant is given by
$\int_{k\pi}^{(k+1)\pi} \frac{1}{(k\pi)^2|sin x|^{1/2}} dx$
Oh, mistake
I think I get the rest of the solution
I‘ll edit the above integral
gautamdb
It feels unnatural because they started by proving the integral between 0 and pi, whereas when I would do it I would start by converting it to series form
Exactly
You are absolutely right
This happens often with proofs
The order one thinks about it is one, the way it is written down is often in reverse
Is it considered incorrect to write it in "thinking" order?
No.
I like it more when it is written in thinking order.
Only when the proofs get very long, it is sometimes more convenient to write it in reverse order
Because instead of having to prove each small result you need during the proof, you can just refer to Lemma xyz
Makes sense, but i would argue this wasnt that long that it would be inconvenient to do it chronologically
You would argue right
Anyways ill try to redo the question in a while to check ive actually understood
Thank you for the help!
.close
Closed by @reef kestrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to find the slope of
E (-2, 1), F(2, 5)
I have a formula which is
y2 - y1 / x2 - x1
yep
are E and F points? just plug in the values
where E and F are (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) respectively
so it's like this
based on the formula
yeah, that's right
okay thank you
Closed by @hollow halo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there an easy way to do this
what details can you notice in the graph
These are all the conclusions:||two distinct roots, one inflection point, constant term positive, even roots, negative leading coefficient,positive local maxima for negative x||
open this only after trying yourself first
a local max to the left
its got 2 x intercepts
and then
yeah thats about all i can find
idk why but are u australian curriculum, it just looks oddly similar to the typsetting style they use here
sry it is bit of a random question
yes this is the hsc
3u?
2u
ah i see
are u australian?
im prepping for hsc as well rn lol
lol nice
absolutely swamped by english advanced T=T
ya
sorry im getting off topic
u do 4u?
yeah
crazy that you identified an entire curriculum based off one question with nothing supporting the same
i mean its pretty easy to identify when youve spent hours practicing the same style of questions
hsc got a distinct font
so nsw kiddies would know
its kinda sad but ive done 500 or so trial papers and hsc papers os its become ingrianed into my mind
traumatising to some extent
anyhow i digress
distinct font??😭😭 I can't distinguish it with the discord font
anyways
back to the question
Closed by @wild fable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Cant just cant. Need to study questions like this for my upcoming olympiad
@sand geode Has your question been resolved?
consider sum of cubes
How do I even use the sum of cubes in the 1st one
(sqrta + sqrtb)^3 etc
@sand geode Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not particularly sure where to start tbh
expand (X - mu)^2
u need to know some properties
Edmund Cloudsley
Oh which one in particular
(sorry im a bit new to stats)
Edmund Cloudsley
How do I get rid of the Mu term and the 2?
do u recognise what can be immediately simplified
I don't think so
the mean
ok
yesh
therefore this would put mu^2 and the mu outside the expectation
but then how do we remove them after that?
it should turn to this $E[X^{2}] + (E[X])^{2}-2E[X]*E[X]$
Dootud
hmm but why so?
we just apply linearity again to the last term
ohhhh okay
so this simplifies into what u want
I woudl stuill have to look up this concept of linearity
but thanks so much for your assistance
have a good day
.close
Closed by @maiden stag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i keep getting -(ax+hy)/(hx+by)
@fathom saffron Has your question been resolved?
@fathom saffron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
in an arithmetic series, the sum of the 9th and 12th member is 15, what is the sum of the first 20 members of this series
do you know the formula for the nth term of an arithmetic sequence?
and the sum up to n terms?
yes
but the first member and the change are absent from the data
sorry
difference
you can write an equation for them
it is actually possible using only this information
yes
we have 2a1 + 11d + 8d = 15
great, that's correct
2a1 +19d =15
yep and now can you use the formula for the sum?
yes
n/2[2a1 + (n-1)d]
for the first 20 sentences that would be
10[2a1 + 19d]
oh wait
thats the same thing
10 time 15
thank you man
no worries!
🙏
yeah because the 1st term + 20th term is constant
so is the 2nd term + 19th term the same
so it's the (k)th term and (21 - k)th term in general
here we just have k = 9
that's how Gauss added up 1 + 2 + 3 + .... + 100 actually
indeed (; we have learned the proof for the sum of the arithmetic series formula, it is practically a re-written form of gauss's formula for integers
thank you once more you have been extremely helpful
Closed by @compact ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
"Express the side length of a square as a function of the length d of the square's diagonal"
what does it mean? does it want me to create a function like:
d is length of the square's diagonal and f(d) is side length of the square?
Lets call the side length a.
It would be like
d(a)=8a+3/a
(Not the solution ofc)
To find it, you can use pythagoras
And then solve for d
and d(a) is diagonal length?
d is the length of the diagonal
the (a) means it depends on the value of a
We say d is a function of a
Closed by @naive orbit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this a valid proof for proving that sup{A+k} = sup{A} + k?
@warm osprey Has your question been resolved?
@warm osprey Has your question been resolved?
@warm osprey Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
\textbf{3.} Let the subspaces $\ \mathcal{W} = { \mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^4 \mid x_1 - x_2 + x_3 = 0, ; x_1 + 2x_3 = 0, ; x_2 + x_3 + x_4 = 0 }$ and $\ \mathcal{H} = { \mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^4 \mid 2x_3 - x_4 = 0 }$.
Find, if possible, subspaces $\mathcal{S}$ and $\mathcal{T}$ of $\mathbb{R}^4$ such that:
[
\dim(\mathcal{S}) = \dim(\mathcal{T}), \quad \mathcal{S} \cap \mathcal{T} = \mathcal{H}^{\perp}, \quad \mathcal{W} \subset \mathcal{S}, \quad \text{and} \quad \mathbb{R}^4 = (\mathcal{S} + \mathcal{T}) \oplus \langle (1, 2, 2, 1) \rangle.
]
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
@stoic imp Has your question been resolved?
@stoic imp Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
what
exactly my thoughts
is this correct or wrong
idk 😭
@stoic imp Has your question been resolved?
What a predicament
May god send you someone to get you out of this
Although i want to help, i only understand half of the question
Anyways, gn
thank u for the kind words bachira
Anytime megumin
@stoic imp Has your question been resolved?
Unreal
@stoic imp Has your question been resolved?
I suggest pinging helpers
-
Both $\mathcal{S}$ and $\mathcal{T}$ must be proper subspaces, otherwise the sum $(\mathcal{S} + \mathcal{T}) \oplus \langle (1, 2, 2, 1) \rangle$ wouldn't be direct. Even more, $\dim(\mathcal{S} + \mathcal{T}) = 3$.
-
$\mathcal{S}$ contains both $\mathcal{H}^{\perp}$ and $\mathcal{W}$. It's easy to calculate that $\mathcal{W} = \langle (2, 1, -1, 0) \rangle$, and $\mathcal{H}^{\perp} = \langle (0, 0, 2, -1) \rangle$ (check that yourself!), hence $\mathcal{S} = \langle (2, 1, -1, 0), \ (0, 0, 2, -1), \ v \rangle$ for some vector $v$.
-
Since $\mathcal{T}$ contains $\mathcal{H}^{\perp}$, we see that $\mathcal{T} = \langle (0, 0, 2, -1), \ u_1, \ u_2 \rangle$.
-
From (1) and (2) we know that $\mathcal{S} + \mathcal{T} = \langle (2, 1, -1, 0), \ (0, 0, 2, -1), \ v, \ u_1, \ u_2 \rangle$. From (0) we conclude that $\dim(\langle v, \ u_1, \ u_2 \rangle) = 1$, hence $v=k_0 w$, $u_1 = k_1 w$, $u_2 = k_2 w$ for some $w \in \mathbb{R}^4 \setminus 0$.
-
If $k_0 \neq 0$ and $k_1 \neq 0$, then from (3) we obtain that $\mathcal{S} \cap \mathcal{T} = \langle (0, 0, 2, -1), \ w \rangle$, which obviously has dimension 2. But we want dim=1 so $k_0 = 0$ or $k_1=k_2=0$.
-
If $k_0=0$, we have $\mathcal{S}=\langle (2, 1, -1, 0), \ (0, 0, 2, -1) \rangle$, and $\mathcal{T}=\langle (0, 0, 2, -1), w \rangle$. We want the sum from (0) to be direct, so $w$ must be a vector linearly independent with $(2, 1, -1, 0), \ (0, 0, 2, -1), \ (1, 2, 2, 1)$. For example, $w=(0, 0, 0, 1)$.
-
If $k_1=k_2=0$, then $\mathcal{S}=\langle (2, 1, -1, 0), \ (0, 0, 2, -1), \ w \rangle$, and $\mathcal{T}=\langle (0, 0, 2, -1) \rangle$. Again, $w=(0, 0, 0, 1)$ works.
EQUENOS
@stoic imp the wait seems to be over?
I wanted to ask, how did you figure that dim(S) has exactly 3 vectors inside
still reading point 2, but was wondering about that in point 1, everything else is very clear
oh I see
dim(S+T)=dim(S)+dim(T)-dim(SnT
dim(S+T)=dim(S)+dim(T)-dim(SnT)
3 = 2dim(S)-dim(Hperp)
3 +1 = 2 dim(S)
dim(S)=2??
Oh, right, I forgot that they want dim(S)=dim(T)
Yes, in this case dim(S)=2
The whole argument changes if dim(T)=dim(S)=2
Look at (6) you said T = <(0,0,2,-1)>
Also I noticed there is a typo in the set builder
Yes, point 6 would've been removed if I remembered about dim(T)=dim(S)
Anyways, the scheme of proof still works
but I still need to find T
and is dim 2 somehow
also you say (0,0,0,1) works but if we are going to extend a basis, is better if we rref the column space and append the canonical vectors of R^4
.close
Closed by @stoic imp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is the red one wrong?
the 2 is for accounting CV and VC both
@supple citrus Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
😥
ples 😞
@supple citrus Has your question been resolved?
@supple citrus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone draw the new figure and explain to me 😢 Im on the verge of tears
@buoyant sigil Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@buoyant sigil Has your question been resolved?
NO 😡 OKAY LISTEN 😭 LIFE IS DIFFICULT ALRIGHT MAN? THANKS TO DISCORD I HAD TO GET MY DAD TO HELP 😰 HE HELPED AND I FINALLY FINISHED
THIS SERVER IS SO FAKE! 😡 When I was a little boy...my mama told me 🤫 Son, we gonna have to buy jewels for lit
😢

you just said your dad helped
cry more
dads are the best
yeah i need help on another question 😁
my dad is a tired man I want him to get rest
knief you better meet me at room 312 I am waiting for a boxxing session
.close
Closed by @buoyant sigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo
anyone know how to solve this ?
ik the first one is correct doing matrix multiplication
@elfin jewel Has your question been resolved?
@elfin jewel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how many similar triangles can be formed using n integer numbers starting from 1? (the numbers represent side length)
are repeated numbers allowed?
like can u have 111, 222, 333, 444...nnn
yes
The main obstacle for me to solve this problem is prime numbers.
Primes should be the easiest sides in the problem. If a side is prime, then the ratio of similarity is restricted to integers
For composite numbers as sides, the ratio of similarity extends to rational numbers.
You should count the triangles such that gcd(a,b) = gcd(b,c) = gcd(a,c) = 1, as they would encompass all the possible triangles with non similarity, and extend that set to include the similarity
Of course, that set isnt exhaustive of all possible triangles since it wont count triangles like 8,9,12 and so on
triangles with such conditions would have the most number of similar triangles
yes, and most easy to count similar triangles for
I tried to sort all prime number triangles first then triangles with one side having two factors and then triangles with sides having 3 factors and so on..
Not all three sides of the triangle have to have the same number of factor though
Is my method on spot?
But my worry is how can I detemine how many primes are there
@tardy reef do you have any idea?
By my logic, the number of triangles becomes a sum of totient functions, so I dont think thats a viable solution
number of primes in [1,n] and values of totient(k) in [1,n]; knowing either of them is pretty much impossible, without exhaustive calculations
ngl, only similar problem I have done is where the chosen set of integers was for the values of the three angles, and that is a pretty small number, easy to calculate
this problem on the other hand seems too beyond me to solve casually in small time.
@dense badger Has your question been resolved?
what does that totient function mean?
Euler's totient function counts the positive integers up to a given integer n that are relatively prime to n
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I see so this might be a problem that can be only solved using a computer
btw this problem just pop up on my mind while I was doing a similar type of problem
@dense badger Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dense badger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
trying to prove this
i went like
*by induction
(n+1 + 1) ^2 = (x + 1)^2 + 3
(x + 1)^2 + 3 < 2n^2 + 3
idk where to go after this
im thinking
(x + 1)^2 + 3 < 2n^2 + 3(x + 1)^2
3 < 3(x + 1)^2
(x + 1)^2 + 3 < 2n^2 + 6n^2
3(x+1)^2 < 6n^2
(x+1)^2 + 3 < 4*2n^2
ughh but thats wrong i needed n to be n+1
im stuck
16 not 8
Now we assume the premise
yes
So (k+1)^2 < 2k^2
yep
Ok expand both sides
k^2 + 4 + 4k < 2k^2 + 2 + 4k
The right sise is wrong
Ok
4k and 4k are equal so we can eliminate them from the inequality
2 < k^2 where k>=3
that works
i think going from left side and try to make right kinda makes things little tricky
straight up putting values on both sides
nice
@worthy lance can u help with this approach!
(n+1 + 1) ^2 = (x + 1)^2 + 3
(x + 1)^2 + 3 < 2n^2 + 3
is it possible to get the same proof
via this
.close
Closed by @fresh steeple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain this to me?
Closed by @barren sorrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is my height for this is 0m??
yea, i think it is 🙂
@copper lily Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @copper lily
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have been experimenting around with continued fractions and ended up with this one. Using code I managed to find out, that this series seems to diverge. How would I proof that x_n+1 > x_n for all n?
Have you considered an inductive proof perhaps?
I have, but it doesn't exactly feel very elegant. I feel like there should be a way to proof this using algebra
hmm I see.
btw did the inductive proof work?
$$\frac{n}{1 + \frac{n - 1}{2 + \frac{n - 2}{3 + ...}}}$$
Edmund Cloudsley
$$\frac{n + 1}{1 + \frac{n}{2 + \frac{n - 1}{3 + ...}}}$$
Edmund Cloudsley
well one argument could be
(and I am not entirely sure if I'm correct)
is that the numerator would be larger than the denominator in every single case
or iteration rather
therefore the X_n+1 must be larger than X_n
bit of an intuitive way to put it
Yeah that's what I got, but I don't know how I would proof that the numerator outgrows the denominator
Or since it seems to grow infinitely, what the growth would look like (in terms of a function)
To maybe explain how I got there: I stumbled upon this very interesting result
I then saw this in a stackexchange forum page:
So I wondered, since he came up with a way to turn series into a continued fraction, maybe the other way would be true too - turning a continued fraction into a series.
And maybe, using this series, it is possible to determine that it would diverge and therefore proove it?
Using some terrible python code:
hmm that is an interesting thought
or
you could also perhaps one of the iterations in terms of another iteration
like we do in integration sometimes
$$x_n = \frac{n}{1 + \frac{n - 1}{2 + \frac{n - 2}{3 + \cdots}}}$$
$$
x_{n-1} = \frac{n - 1}{2 + \frac{n - 2}{3 + \cdots}}$$
Edmund Cloudsley
@river oak Has your question been resolved?
This also seems like a dead end :/
Also it doesn't seem to be correct, for instance:
$$x{n-1} = \frac{n - 1}{1 + \frac{n - 2}{2 + \cdots}}$$
NinTobias
^ supposed to be x_n-1
@river oak Has your question been resolved?
I have made... a bit of progress. Consider the function
expanding it yields
where, if you take the limit as n->infinity, you get 20.
but adding more terms yields
So the more terms get added, the bigger the limit - and I think, x_n where n-> infinity diverges.
not at all rigorous - I'd be pleased and enlightened to know how to proof this rigorously (or even if it is possible to find a closed form for this).
@river oak Has your question been resolved?
@river oak Has your question been resolved?
I think I have a rigorous proof but it's not very elegant
Here I wanted to include the calculation of the senior coefficients of Q_{2k}(x) and R_{2k}(x) but to be fair that's not sufficient...
(Btw they're equal to k(k+1) and 1 respectively)
But I forgot that other coefficients might also rapidly grow with n... Nonetheless, I think it's very possible to show that other coefficients don't make much impact
Wow, this is quite dense. Gotta make a pot of coffee and work through it.
Btw, the bot might accidentally close the channel soon: #help-39 message
I suggest pressing the x while the coffee is brewing
thanks!
@river oak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
