#help-36
1 messages · Page 157 of 1
he never really taught us how to treat dy/dx as part of the equation that I remember, I just know it as a sign of what to derive :')
and to separate stuff
from ~constants~
yes which is just cos^2
fair
so we can now express cos^2 y in terms of x
so if tan(y) = x, can you express this in a triangle
draw a triangle with one angle being y
then the opposite side is x
adjacent side is 1
then find what cos(y) is
and just square it
x^2?
I did not draw this thing with a hypotenuse :')
hypotenuse is not 1
waitwhat
use pythagorean theorem for hypotenuse
OH YEAH
I forgot it's spelled sohcahtoa xD
why am I blanking. This stuff is so easy- sobbb, sec
x^2 + 1^2 = hypotenuse^2
you can but the point was to express cos^2 y in terms of x
I'm sorry, I'm mostly a visual learner. I appreciate your patience xD
Isee
ok I'm pitifully stumped
and very tired
how is it almost 7
ooomg I'ma hafta pull another all nighter. I can see it now -.-
happens
caffeine
🙏🏻
the test is tmr tho, I can't afford this. :')
oh
mmm I do have some instant coffee
that’s not good
no, no it is not
it's ok, I got a 48/50 on the midterm and the homework is completion, so I can definitely pass. I've kinda given up on an A tho xD
that’s good
I mean wouldn't that just be x+1=h
no
well frick
$\sqrt{x^2+1}$
knief
$\sqrt{a^2+b^2} \neq a+b$
knief
oh I was doing them separately oops
brb a min, I am being called
by father dearest
baaaack
hello
helllo
so this is our hypotenuse
$\cos y = \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2+1}}$
knief
knief
makes sense
knief
ahhhh
problem solved
ok, I see! :o
need to touch up on my trig :')
I appreciate your help and patience <3
I should probably go speedrun now :<
calculus is only hard if you haven’t mastered algebra/trig
yep
yeeeeeeeah
good luck
I thought I was good at algebra, but I think covid kinda whacked me in HS :')
thank you! :)
have a lovely day/night o/
.close
Closed by @proven lion
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you too
<3
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
lets say i get a linear system like this
its 0 solution right? since it contradicts
what does it contradict?
you mean it's inconsistent?
oh 0x + 0y + 0z = -17.83333?
yeah no solutiion
Closed by @gray acorn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi i need help with functions and their equations
what's $\Delta$? The change in $y$?
ƒ(Why am. I here)=I don't Know
@drifting harness Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @drifting harness
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It gonna be simple question
Is a time complexity of O(exponential) classified as an NP problem rather than a P problem?
I have tried to check the difference between definitions of NP problem and P problems, but I am confused due to inconsistency of information.
P problem
Why is that?
NP problems are basically problems which you don't know how long it will take to solve deterministically, while P problems can always be solved in a given polynomial time order
Definition
P is polynomial time, NP is non-polynomial time
So big O (k^n) is regarded as polynomial.
Yes
I didn't know that O(2^n) is even polynomial-
Thank you
Then what are not polynomials for time complexity?
Given a number, find prime factors
I actually forgot why lemme check rq
Since we can always find prime factors in O(sqrt(n))?
im sorry
Closed by @tight lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Quick question regarding transitiveness in set theory.
Wouldn't a point being related to itself fulfill the transitiveness definition?
Not necessarily.
Transitivity of a relation R on a set A means:if a, R, b and b, R, c, then a, R,c for all a, b, c an element in A.
On the other hand, a point being related to itself refers to reflexivity, where a, R, a for all a in A . Reflexivity by itself does not imply transitivity unless the other conditions of transitivity are met. Does that make sense?
To add, all 3 conditions for an equivalence relation are completely independent of each other, we can be any combination of reflexive, transitive, and symmetric
Exactly
It's not intuitive to me where the lines are drawn so to say, because an element can be related to itself as part of being transitive? For example (1,1) (1,2)
I get it.
transitivity can involve self-relations, but remember that self-relations are neither required nor sufficient to define transitivity on their own.
A relation R on a set A is transitive if, whenever a, R, b and b, R, c, it follows that a, R, c.
Self-relations like (1,1) can participate in the logic of transitivity, but they are not “inherently” what makes a relation transitive. Instead, remember transitivity depends on the chain a, R, b and b, R, c.
Good explanation, I follow up to this point.
What I don't quite get is, can a and b be the same element?
I believe yes, then can b and c be the same element? I believe no?
And when you say participate I assume that (1,1) can be part of the logic, it can EITHER be a R b or b R c?
There’s no restrictions, so I don’t see why not
Then wouldn't it just be (1,1), (1,1), (1,1) is a transitive relation?
If 1 R 2 and 2 R 2, then by transitivity 1 R 2, which you already know
Yeah it’s just a stupid one
okay one last question
Which one of these two would a (1,1), (1,1), (1,1) relation be?
Is the 2nd case even possible
Yes, a and b can absolutely be the same element in the context of transitivity. For example, if (1,1) in R and (1,2) in R, the transitivity condition asks whether (1,2) must also be in R and it already is. So this works fine.
Actually it must be the 1st one, but then every reflexive relation would be transitive which doesn't make sense
Something is wronnngg
If you think of a relation as a subset of A x A, then the left is {(1,1)} and the right is {(1,1), (1,1)), (1,1)}, which is an equality of sets
Sets don’t care about duplication
It's all good gang I'll just tell me professor im not made for this life
Actually my book touched on just this question just after where I was 💀 I think I got my answer, thanks !
@soft cave Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @soft cave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
but must the eigenvalues of a matrix be arranged in the diagonal matrix in a certain order, or does it not matter how I arrange them?
Bonk
You are diagonalising, so the order will affect your P matrix
[
\begin{bmatrix}
-1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 3
\end{bmatrix}
]
Task Bot
For example, if the eigenvalues are -1,1,3
For example, I can now exchange the 3 with the -1
[
\begin{bmatrix}
3& 0 & 0 \
0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & -1
\end{bmatrix}
]
Task Bot
You can but then you will need to swap the columns in the P matrix
And how do I know in what order I should write them
In the same order of the respective eigenvalues
So first column of P is the eigenvector associated to the first eigenvalue appearing in the matrix D
And so on
In some context (such as PCA) eigenvalues might be usually written from highest to smallest
What I wrote is my D matrix
Yes
Task Bot
Of this matrix I found its eigenvalues to be -1,1,3
Now I want to arrange them on the diagonal matrix
[
\begin{bmatrix}
? & 0 & 0 \
0 & ? & 0 \
0 & 0 & ?
\end{bmatrix}
]
Task Bot
Do u know what diagonalisation achieves
But I don't know what order to put them in
hi
@mortal berry
jandro0103
Is this chatgpt 😭
it doesnt matter, as long as the eigenvalue is in the same column as its eigenvector
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
is this what you mean?
I think you are really trying at something without actually looking into what it is you are achieving
Again, the order doesn't matter
Why r u putting Eigenvalues onto a diagonal ?
If u answer what u r achieving with diagonalisation itself, then ur answer becomes very clear
Because that's how you construct the diagonal matrix D !?
To find the diagonal matrix D
I'm asking taskbot
Ah sorry
Right, what's the point of finding D
Why r u finding D
To find the diagonal matrix D
Bro, what is the purpose of the diagonal matrix is what I'm asking
The text asked me to find the diagonal matrix D
Read the text further, the idea is diagonalisation
So the matrix D inherently depends on the matrix P
We are trying to break a matrix A into 3 matrices
Now I have to find the diagonalizing matrix P
We diagonalise in order to make computations easy
So don't you think D will depend on P ?
Or vice versa
So D will have eigenvalues, and P will have the corresponding eigenvectors of matrix A
See why diagonalisation works
I think that's a way better way of answering ur question
Because it's a really good question
So it will be rewarding to see for urself
See how and why it is that diagonalisation works
What we are essentially doing in diagonalisation is we are changing the basis from standard basis to the eigenvector basis
And in that basis the matrix operation is a simple stretching
Hence the diagonal matrix
P changes the basis
Diagonal matrix just stretches space
And P inverse gives back the standard basis
@mortal berry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
@gentle zephyr Has your question been resolved?
fkk im so tired of this algebra stupid exam
if I manage to pass this exam I will never look back
dim(W) = 2 -> dim(S) >= 2
So maybe try finding a basis for S then the basis for W must be linearly independent to at least two of the vectors in the basis of S
dim(S+W) = dim(S)+dim(W) - dim(S ∩ W)
Is <> span?
If the intersection of S and W is strictly a subset of T then it can it can only be either (4,1,0,2)t or (4,1,2,0)t right?
No nevermind
Because it’s span of T
is there somone who understand frensh
@gentle zephyr Has your question been resolved?
@gentle zephyr
Basis of S, B = {(1,1,0,0), (0,0,1,0), (1,0,0,1)}
One of these vectors, p, will be a basis vector of W, thus S n W = {pt for some t in R | p in <T> }
So p is a linear combination of (4, 1, 0, 2) and (4, 1, 2, 0)
yeah
Hmm, none of them can be, so I may have miscomputed B
S: -x1 + x2 + x4 = 0
S: x1 = x2 + x4
(x1,x2,x3,x4)=(x2+x4,x2,x3,x4)
x2(1,1,0,0)+x3(0,0,1,0)+x4(1,0,0,1)
S = <(1,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(1,0,0,1)>
Yeah
basis of S is correct sir
we are looking for W
we know
S ∩ W ⊂ T
then
S ∩ T ≠ {0}
S and T have a nontrivial intersection
By the inclusion-exclusion thm, one v in B must also be in W
dim(S+W) = dim(S)+dim(W) - dim(S ∩ W)
S + W = R^4
dim(R^4) = dim(S) + 2 - dim(S ∩ W)
4 = 2 + dim(S) - dim(S ∩ W)
dim(S)=3
2+3 = 5, 4 = 5 - 1 -> dim(S n W) = 1
dim(S n W) = 1
Yeah, we’re missing something
w1 = a(4,1,0,2) + b(4,1,2,0)
= (4a + 4b, a + b, 2b, 2a)
yea
S ∩ W ⊂ T
S = <(1,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(1,0,0,1)>
W = <w1,w2>
T = <(4,1,0,2),(4,1,2,0)>
<(1,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(1,0,0,1)> ∩ <w1,w2> ⊂ <(4,1,0,2),(4,1,2,0)>
(1,0,0,1) = (4a + 4b, a + b, 2b, 2a)
a + b = 0 -> a = - b, 2b = 0 -> b = 0 -> a = 0 which doesn’t work
this is saying that w1 ∈ T, is it true?
Yes
could be a combination of various vectors from S
not necessarily only (1,0,0,1)
lets find SnT
Ahhh yeah because then it would be l.d.
It only has to be linearly independent to w2
yeah
T : a(4,1,0,2)+b(4,1,2,0)
T : (4a+4b,a+b,2b,2a)
S : -x1 + x2 + x4 = 0
(x1,x2,x3,x4)=(4a+4b,a+b,2b,2a)
S∩T: -(4a+4b)+(a+b)+2a = 0
SnT: -4a-4b+a+b+2a = 0
a(-4+1+2)+b(-4+1)=0
-a-3b=0
a = -3b
(x1,x2,x3,x4)=(4a+4b,a+b,2b,2a)
(x1,x2,x3,x4)=(4(-3b)+4b,(-3b)+b,2b,2(-3b))
b(-12+4,-3+1,2,-6)
SnT=<(-12+4,-3+1,2,-6)>
SnT=<(-8,-2,2,-6)>
dim(SnT)=1
(-4, -1, 1, -3) = a(1, 1, 0, 0) + b(0, 0, 1, 0) + c(1, 0, 0, 1) -> a = -1, b = 1, c= -3
Yeah that works
For w1
Now just need w2
provlem is
we need
S + W = R^4
dim(S) = 3
dim(W) = 2
W = <(-8,-2,2,-6), w2>
S = <(1,1,0,0),(0,0,1,0),(1,0,0,1)>
Just need a vector in R^4 linearly independent to vectors in basis of S
yeah
(0,1,0,0)
standard basis vector?
I believe it works
it works I think
Another one solved then
W = <(-8,-2,2,-6), (0,1,0,0)>

exercises are nasty man
maybe not so much, but sometimes is tricky
Yeah some of them can take a while to get started
Closed by @gentle zephyr
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
2x^2 - 5 = sqrt((x+5)/2)
How would I solve for x
Square both sides, you get a quartic
Quartics suck 🙂
,w solve(2x^2 - 5 = sqrt((x+5)/2), x)
i think we need to search a trivial solution
It probably isn't nice, there are techniques you can use to get a closed form solution, but
They're not really practical in most cases
Failed to get a response from Wolfram Alpha.
If the problem persists, please contact support.
And if you know how to do it, you can do a euclidean division of the polynomial $2X^2 -5-sqrt(X+5/2)$ by the polynomial $X-alpha$ where alpha is the trivial solution we found
ss
notice that you have f(x)=f^-1(x)
Oh! Nice catch
all solutions to these problems are f(x)=x
There is a second solution to the problem at around -1.77, but I'm not sure how you would obtain that.
,w 2x^2-5=x
Failed to get a response from Wolfram Alpha.
If the problem persists, please contact support.
darn it looks like the bot is down
(1 + √(41))/4 if I mental mathed the quadratic formula correctly
start here
Closed by @elfin glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
kinda confused how to graph this (precalculus rational functions review)
why does it say decreasing on the intervalS when they give one interval
idfk
did they mean decreasing on each interval separately
presumably
Failed to get a response from Wolfram Alpha.
If the problem persists, please contact support.
Closed by @signal sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
complain to your teacher about the wording
okay LMFAO
math teachers love pedantic students
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how the hell do I find points Q and R
<@&286206848099549185>
How do you find the equation of a line perpendicular to another
like
I done part a
ok
I need to do part b
so you have shown QS has equation x+3y = 22
yes
22
AND R IS 2 ALONG SO ITS (24,6)
I get it now
thank you
bit of a brain fart
but tysm 🙏🏻
.close
Closed by @fringe quarry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone possibly double check my work?
What were you doing here ?
@rustic finch Has your question been resolved?
compound angle formula
i get you but why is it a split fraction
it should be 1 big fraction
no
so, can you show me how to do it?
ok
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
just reopen the channel
.reopen
✅
Here
don't forget that you should multiply by the conjugate
(when writing the final answer)
@rustic finch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rustic finch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Someone help me with this I really do not understand I am so lost…my teacher doesn’t know how to explain it to me properly
you might be interested to know that $\int _a ^b f(x) \dd x = \int _a ^c f(x) \dd x + \int _c ^b f(x) \dd x$ if $a \leq b \leq c$ and other assumptions
jan Niku
can you think of how you might use this fact
can anyone help me with this question?
wait im thinking
i know the answer is (B) but i do not understand why
go make your own help post please
i did
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
this is not your channel bruh
how do i make my own channel
Go to that channel in the message.
um do i add the integral from 0 to 10 and then add the one from 3 to 10??
idk im very slow im so sorry
oh
would integral of 0 to 3
for f(x) be 19
and then g(x) is 16
so u minus? and then get 3...?
we should prolly make a better notation
maybe
or a better way of writing this
i think the idea is that, if we want $$\int _0 ^3 h(x) \dd$$, and we know $\int _0 ^{10} h$ and $\int _3^{10}h$ then we might think $$\int _0 ^3 h = \int _0^{10} h - \int _3 ^{10} h$$
jan Niku
if youre confused about the last line, try adding $\int _3^{10} h$ to both sides, and then using this rule to figure they really are equal
jan Niku
okay i kind of understand
that is what i did to find f(x) froom 0 to 3
i do the same with g(x)?
jan Niku
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\int _0 ^{10} f = 21$ \\
\item $\frac 12 \int _0 ^{10} g = 8$ \\
\item $\int _3 ^{10} (f-g) = 2$
\end{enumerate}
jan Niku
@wanton trout can you find the value of $\int _0 ^{10} (f-g)$ using facts 1-3?
jan Niku
yeah
what do you get?
youre close but youre missing one thing
the 1/2?
so 17?
hmm?
or do i have to half the 13
so lets look at 2
$\frac 12 \int g = 8$ then $2 \qty( \frac 12 \int g ) = 2 \qty( 8 )$
jan Niku
why do we do 2 times 1/2 of g?
because we want to know $\int g$ not $\frac 12 \int g$
jan Niku
yea, to be more specific
well, lets not clutter up the chat too much math, can you just fix your answer here?
21-16 = 5
yea
so 5 - 2 = 3
jan Niku
yea i think you got the idea
if i had something else would it be the same thing?
hmm? something else?
yea, but you need one more property
jan Niku
ohh okkk
can you help me with um another question
or do i have to make a new channel
Closed by @wanton trout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
let there be a non-convex quadilateral ABCD, with angle B=C=60 and angle A=30, line AB and and CD intersect at E, AD and BC intersect at F, and EF and BD intersect at P. If CF=AE=1, find EP^2
∆BEC is a equilateral triangle because of b= 60° c= 60°
yea
oh yeah
BEC is 60
mb
Let me try to work it out
damn this is ugly did i do anything wrong
wait hold on what if mass of points
so EP=3/7 EF
wait im a dumbass ptolemy doesetnt work here lmao
EF is sqrt7
so EP=3/sqrt7?
yes
Closed by @jagged flare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How are these two equivalent?
And how are you able to get rid of 1/(n+1000) after n = 1000?
i'm still a little confused, once you say u = n + 1000, you can replace the demoninator so that it is 1/u
but how does that affeect the index
the sum is summing from n = 1 to infty, right?
yes
let u = n + 1000, since n = 1, the lower bound is now u = 1 + 1000 = 1001
the upper bound stays the same, because infty + 1000 = infty
Closed by @waxen jay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have a final exam tomorrow and i have 0 clue how to do this pls help
@sour seal Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sour seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
1e+308K ×3 =
<@&286206848099549185>
Click 🎉 button to enter!
Winners: 1
Ends: <t:1736961168:R> (Timer)
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont understand how the area of the side triangle in a pyramid is 1/2 * height (thats perpendicular to the edge of the base) * perimeter of the sqaure (the base of the pyramid)
soo the law for a triangle's area is 1/2 * base * height
i understand the height in this
but how is the 1/2 base of the trinagle equal to 1/2 base of the square
I might be misunderstanding you but the side triangle has the base which is equal to the side length of the square present below in the pyramid
yeah i mean, they are equal so
height * 1/2 base = 1/2 height * perimeter of the square
so base of triangle = perimeter of square
It shouldn't be perimeter
that is a war crime
oh wait
ahaaaaaa
so the base of the triangle is equal to one of the lengths
aka 1/4 of the perimeter
Yes exactly
ok then wtf is this
I wonder the same
i cant wrap my head around it tbh
the law is 1/2 * perimeter of square * the perpendicular height
that means that the perimeter of the square is equal to the base of the triagle... ist somethings wrong
Its bc the area of the triangle is (1/2)(base)(height) but we know that the base is 1/4 of the perimeter of the square below so we can say (1/2)(1/4 perimeter of square)(height) but they there are 4 triangles so (1/2)(perimeter of the square)(height)
the LAW is not wrong, this one
so what am i doing wrong
That is for 4 triangles I believe
OOOOH
THE RULE IS LIKE
THE VOLUME OF THE PYRAMID
NOT THE AREA FOR THE SIDE TRIANGLE
💀 mb
You sure?
Volume of a pyramid's formula looks quite different
holup
The law you stated is actually the lateral surface area of a square pyramid
Meaning area of all the triangles present
oh so we divided by 4
If square has side a and slant height is l
for one triangle it's 1/2 × a × l
for four triangle it's 2×a×l
Your law states it's 1/2 × perimeter × slant height
1/2 × 4a × l
= 2 × a × l
okay i think i get it now, you're saying my problem is that i thought the law was for ONE triangle, not FOUR
Same thing
Yes
yeaaaah
makes a ton of sense now
much appreciated sorry for me being
slow
uhm my finales are tomorrow 😊 bye
nah man it's all chill
all the best
.close
Closed by @next thorn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Idk what to do about the 1/3 exponent
no
start with quotient law, then continue from there
do i do it normally or do I apply 1/3 to all the g
OK do i divide by g^2/3
ok
you'll have g^(2/3) in the denom after the initial application if that's what you mean
Im at this idk if it's right so far
no
don't sub in anything yet
start with just the quotient rule
get that sorted before attempting to evaluate
Dx ( cube rt g) = 1/3 cube root g² not g'
Yea do this first dont plug any values yet
So u dont get confused
IDK
do you know the quotient law?
let's change the g in quotient law to h, so we don't mix it up with the g in your question
(f/h)' = ?
your denominator seemed ok
what would the numerator be when applying that law?
f'h-fh`
Open a new help channel
wdym
like all the g have 1/3 on them
Closed by @grim imp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi yeah so i dont understand e is not a function right
so
i dont get thi
im learning calculus for the first time and i dont understand if this is a composite function or not
because e is a constant no
e is not
but e^x is
just like 3 isn’t a function
and what would the inner and outer function be
so i understand that
e^x is one
is the outer
-x^2
yes it’s the composition of e^x and -x^2
huh did you express it as a composition first
i dont really know how to lmao
its -x^2 and e^x right
apply this
f(g(x)) is a composition where you pass as input g(x) to f
no flip w(x) and u(x)
3x^2 right
yes
now compute w(u(x)) here
w(x) = e^x
u(x) = -x^2
w(u(x)) = w(-x^2) => w(u(x)) = e^(-x^2)
wrong or right
good
yesss thank you so much
so wait
now lastly
differentiate
i know how to differentiate
-x^2
thats -2x
but i dont know how to differentiate e^x
is it just
xe^(x-1)
so how shall i differentiate this
not yet im new to calculus
so far
i have learnt normal differentiation so i can like differentiate like a^x
but i dont know the rest
this is a big deal in the calculus storyline lol
okay then same thing
my friend said to learn chain rule first
how do you differentiate a^x
xa^(x-1) no
it is chain rule but if u don’t know how to differentiate e^x itself then whats the point
no
a^x has derivative a^x ln(a)
what you’re talking about is the power rule or something
when i say a i mean just any like real number
yeah that
the derivative of x^2 is 2x
yeah
yeah i’m aware but that’s not how it works
so what do you think i should learn after the power rule cos im kind of lost
learn the derivative of e^x
u can google it
or just “exponential” or whatever u call it
This calculus video tutorial explains how to find the derivative of exponential functions using a simple formula. It explains how to do so with the natural base e or with any other number. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems including those using the product rule and quotient rule for derivatives.
Derivatives - Free...
watch this
your question is very similar to the exercises in that video
u see there’s even an e^(x^2) there
@golden coyote Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The base of a right prism is a right triangle with a hypotenuse of 8 cm and an angle of 30 deg
The volume of the prism is 48sqrt(3) cm³. Find the lateral surface area of the prism.
Closed by @velvet frigate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
The function F(x) = 2x ^ 3 - 1 is an antiderivative of the function f(x) Specify the function f(x)
i believe the answer here is the last one
f(x)=6x^2
is this correct?
Yep
That is how you're meant to solve it
F'(x) = f(x) by the definition of antiderivative
alright
then I've got another question one sec
Which of the following functions is an antiderivative of the function f(x) = x^-4?
You gotta integrate
the thing is we weren't really taught how to
so in that case I'd have to take each F(x) and take the dash of them?
Ok so you don't know anything about integration
in that case, i guess that is the best approach
one way to think about is like this
do (x^n+1)/n+1
"what function, if i differentiate it, gets me x^(-4)?"
differentiate it being the dash thing?
yea
do x^(-4) is the result of differentiating another function you dont know about
or doing the "dash thing"
yea sorry i study in my native language I didn't know it's differentiating)
so give it a think
what function, if you differentiate it, gives u x^(-4)?
remember that if f(x) = x^n then f'(x) = nx^(n-1)
theres a seperate formula for fractions right
oh it is called the quotient rule
no don't worry about that here
it is not relevent
this is what u need
so do i just need to find the dash of (x^-4)
No, you're misunderstanding
a would be -3
Aero
yes, thats almost right!
but issue is that if you take it as F(x) = x^(-3), then f(x) = -3x^(-4)
NOT f(x) = x^(-4), which is what u have
how do we get rid of the -3?
f(x)
erm
idk im a bit confused about that part
so, do you understand that this is what you're trying to do to be clear?
yea
so you were correct that the exponent ??? is meant to be -3
Aero
what is the remaining ??? meant to be though
so you are saying it should be -3x^(-3), yes?
yea
well apply this
ok so -3*-3^-4
you missed the x
-3*-3x^-4
it's 9x^-4 right?
yes
ok so no
issue is you want it to be x^(-4)
try the opposite
you are trying to get rid of the -3
how do you cancel out a -3?
i need to rid of which -3 again?)
here?
so you see how when you differentiate it it brings down a -3?
you want to get rid of it to get only x^(-4)
or well just divide both sides by -3
we have an equation right 😅
you are very close!
Aero
the question is what must ??? be here
-3 is not the smae 1/3^(-1)
-3 is -1/3
yes
Aero
Is there any way you'd be able to go over this in voice chat? If not I understand it's just I really want to recap everything we did
Yes the server doesn't have them but dms should work
If you're not up to that totally get it
@velvet frigate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me understand why hermitian matrices can always be diagonalized with unitary matrices? I know all eigenvalues of hermitian are real and eigenvectors are orthogonal but I am not sure how to use that info in this case
this is (one form of) the spectral theorem
have you proved that?
if not then you have most of the pieces you need
eigenvectors corresponding to distinct eigenvalues will be automatically orthogonal
and for any eigenvalues that have geometric multiplicity > 1 you can take any basis for the eigenspace and orthogonalize it using gram schmidt
so the remaining piece is to show that the eigenspaces have full geometric multiplicity (equal to algebraic multiplicity)
No
is gram schmidt like u = (A-lambaI)w where w is known non eigenvector so u(A-lambaI) = 0 as (A-lambaI)(A-lambaI) = 0
thus u is eigenvector to A?
gram schmidt is just a simple algorithm for making an orthonormal basis given an arbitrary basis
the hard part of the proof is showing that a basis of eigenvectors exists
for that you should read a proof of the spectral theorem, one way is to show that if A is hermitian (or more generally, normal) then A and A* have a common eigenvector
and then you use induction by looking at the space orthogonal to that eigenvector
thx
@ivory bough Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ivory bough
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got one simple question. How come the restrictions include positive 2?
You are starting off with a fraction where you divide by x²+x-6 which gets 0 if x = 2
you mean factor?
oh
Yeah, I see it
I usualy just factor and find the restrictions through that
So the restrictions is any value that when subbed into X, will make 0 in the denominator while simplifying?
@drowsy epoch
yes
never forget from where you came from
if this is your starting point, then find first the domain from here
alright, thanks
and as you progress you might find more restrictions
(dont mind the bunny)
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
@knotty night Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @knotty night
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello I need help with a question, I suppose I hsould just post it here?
suppose I have a degree 4 polynomial in say 10 variables, and I know that for its positive semi-definite for all real values, so its at least \geq 0.
The question is: is there a normal form for the polynomial? For example, does it mean f = f1^2 + f2^2 + … where fi are all degree two polynomials?
For example, suppose f is degree 2, then this follows from the diagonalization of bilinear pairings.
maybe we should just consider the say in 2 variables
if we know that ax^4 + b x y^3 + c x^2 y ^2 + d x^3 y + e y^4 is positive semi-definite
okay appearantly this is Hilbert's 17th problem LOL
and appearantly this is the answer
@fiery hedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fiery hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Would anyone be able to help me remember why I've done this? (Or rather why I copied it from the blackboard) How did we get rid of arctan(1-x)?
Yes? Though I still don't see it
It is true for arctan, but that wouldn't that leave us with (pi/4 + arctg(x-1))/-x?
No, sorry
it would be (x+1)
$\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{\frac{\pi}{4}-\arctan(1-x)}{x}=\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{\frac{\pi}{4}-\arctan(1-(-x))}{-x}$
Axe
Closed by @prime forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this the integral symbol
Could be but i dont know
I don't think so. Probably the one for like 3/2 but written as 1 1/2
no
is this channel still occupied?
nah
May ABCDE be an unregulated pentagon, and M,N,P,Q,U,V midpoints of AB AE ED BC MP NQ in this order. If UVvectotial = a* DC vectorial, find a(a real number) 9th gradr problem