#help-36
1 messages · Page 10 of 1
Now you need to repeat the same for the other answers
Btw this procedure is exactly what you used to find that the third option was correct
@raw burrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does anyone know what should be the approach?
we want maximum of that
i’m stuck on it
the solution is very not solution
this is what i mean
this is one of exam olympiad question
@ancient violet Has your question been resolved?
@ancient violet Has your question been resolved?
i think the best way to approach this solution is to first leverage it on the assumption that the median has to be either 100 or 0 to get the maximum difference between the median and mean, because that maximizes the range of the dataset and the difference between the median and one lower/upper bound
yes the solution is bit intuitive, but how do i prove it algebraically
i get your point
i mean, after the assumption that the median has to be 0 or 100, the rest is proved easily. but i'm not sure there would be a straightforward way of proving algebraically that the median has to be 0 or 100 (at least, i'm not coming up with any)
The best approach I can think of is:
-Isolate the lowest three values: a,b, and c. c is our median, and a<b<c.
-We know that the maximum difference between mean and median will scale proportionally with the size of our range, so a=0 and e=100, utilizing the maximum possible range (e is the largest value from the dataset). this means our mean must be between 20 and 80.
-Then, the maximum possible difference between the mean and median will be achieved if and only if b=c,d=e or b=a,d=c (giving the highest weights to the mean). Using b=c and d=e, our dataset is now [0,c,c,100,100].
-The difference between mean and median with respect to c can now be represented by the linear expression c-(2c+200)/5. Simplifying gives us 3c/5-40. In this linear equation, the extrema are at c=100 and c=0, so the range of possible differences is from 3(100)/5-40=20 to 3(0)/5-40=-40.
-Because -40 has the greatest magnitude, we can conclude 40 is the greatest possible difference between mean and median.
It's not the most clear or intuitive solution (nor is it that well written) but i think it gets the solution concisely and, more importantly, algebraically
a perturbation argument might work...
suppose you have five sorted numbers a,b,c,d,e
and suppose c is not 100
then I can increase the median by delta if I increase c by delta (and if necessary, increase d and e to keep the numbers sorted; at most you would have to increase them by delta)
and that only increases the mean by at most (3/5)delta
so it increases the difference
similar argument if c is not zero, you can make it smaller (decrease a and b if necessary to maintain the sorting) and thereby increase the difference
therefore the best solution must have either c=0 (and hence a=b=0), or c=100 (and hence d=e=100)
alr
@ancient violet Has your question been resolved?
ohhh
i understand it now ig
thanks @smoky shore and @tiny gorge for your remarks 

.close
Closed by @ancient violet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @lean dawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have to determine the pairs (n,m) for which f is holomorphic
throw cauchy riemann equations at it?
you want $nx^{n-1} = my^{m-1}$ to hold for all $x, y \in \bR$
Ann
yes
this means that the exponents on x and y have to be zero
otherwise one side is not constant wrt x while the other is, or vice versa
u can do that???
of course you can reason like this. why couldn't you?
sry I'm studying physics and I always think that something complicated has to come out of something like that
Thankss
.close
Closed by @radiant tundra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What's the highest power of 18 that divides 672! . I thought about using this formula but I think it's only for P prime
@lament mirage Has your question been resolved?
yeah that's what i meant
but why
A friend sent me that, sorry. got the same
no problem i don't know how to explain though
like the factorial of 5 is (2)(3)(2×2)(5)
it can be divided by 2³
or 6^1, or 5^1
there is enough 2s to make three 2s
there's only enough 3s to make 1 six
the formula tells you how many of the prime there is
and then 18 requires two 3s and one 2
if there is enough 3s there's def enough 2s, so we focus on 3s
Ok, got that part
ok
but how you get the 18?
but how do you know it's the half? it's like a pattern?
yeah
I think i got it. If you need 332 for 672! and every 2 (3) you get 18, then you need 332 (3) for 166 (18) ?
i guess
i don't know how to solve it in general, if it was something more complicated than 2×3×3
here it's obvious that you can make 18 out of two 3s
so half the exponent of 3 in the factorization of the factorial
Ok. I understand it know. Tysm
It was kinda difficult to figure it out by myself
.close
Closed by @lament mirage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If $A\in M_n(\mathbb{C})$, prove that there is an upper triangular matrix $T$ and an invertible matrix $P$ such that $P^-1AP=T.$
ohNoiAmHere
I was thinking to do some sort of induction or maybe try 'n mimic a proof of the spectral theorem
but i just don't know how to start it
any tips?
@formal flicker Has your question been resolved?
Let x = v bar , v / ||v bar , v||
Take u = x - e_1
Let Q be the householder matrix associated with U
yea i think i can come up with something
By above
X is the first column of Q
And thus Q is hermitian and unitary
Ok if u need further guide I can pm u the whole thing once I’m done
oki thanks
i was just struggling with the start
which happens all too often
once i get into it usually it works out
The first sentence here
The denom is “ || v bar , v || “
Zzz
Double lines
| | v bar , v | |
Ok
wait so i showed that the eigenvalues of A are in the diagonal of the upper triangular matrix
that is correct right?
.close
Closed by @formal flicker
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What’s the formula for the area of a rectangle?
ye gimme 1 sec to send what ive done so far
Oops
And u put it in the formular
Wdym
Should be -4.31971…
usually its one minus and one plus but both are positive
Ye
alr lemme try
,w solve 2x^2 -x -33
And the one that is positive is the right one
+x
it was wrong when i rounded it
and it gave me a new question D;
you had an issue with signs
D:
doesn't hurt to solve this one properly
Lol
initial approach is alright, just be careful with signs this time
ok gimme a minute to work it out
so its just 5.1?
since u round to nearest 1 dp and thats the positive one
ok it was right
,W (2x+7)(x-3) where x= 5.141
ty guys
cya
uh actually, if i have another question can i just ask it here
cos this next one is harder than the previous
@grave tundra Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @grave tundra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I understand if given a point that I can substitute f(a) and a in this equation. How do I manage this if not given any point?
Closed by @ornate sun
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
question 23
can someone help with what i need to do in the beginning so i can solve it?
Can u plz translate into English?
The ratio of the large base to the small base of a trapezoid is p. The ratio of the largest upright side to the smallest upright side is q. If one draws the two diagonals, then the ratio A/B of the area of the two triangles is which do not certain the bases (see figure) equal to
Thank you!
What does this part mean “which do net certain the bases (see figure) equal to”?
Yes. Just having trouble solving it lol
I thought if we use q = 1 we have a isosceles trapezoid so A = B
the ratio should be 1
can u justify ur answer?
first off, what can you say about the altitude of A and B?
idk
draw the altitudes for them and see what it could be
uh i really dont know
if you look at this image, the two altitudes would be h1 and h2, what can you say about them?
idk how to say it in english
is this q?
there's no need to involve q or p into this
oh
it turns out that both h1 and h2 are the same
yeah
so using that info and the base DC, what can you say about the areas of ADC and BCD?
they are = ?
yep, and we can see they have an overlap area of DPC, right?
yeah
so what can you say about the areas of APD and BPC?
equal too? idk sorry
yep, since area(ADC) = area(BCD), and they have DPC in common, we can see that area(ADC)-area(DPC) = area(APD) and area(BCD)-area(DPC) = area(BPC) and so area(APD) = area(BPC)
so going back to your question, what does that mean for triangle A and triangle B?
that they are equal too so the ratio of A/B is 1?
there you go
note that the only property we used in this entire thing is that the top and bottom bases are parallel, which is one of the properties of all trapezoids, so this will apply to any trapezoid
should i give the corners a name on the figure?
if you need to prove it, then yeah it could be helpful to give them names
Closed by @steady trout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont know the steps to solving
@mellow fox Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do you know calc?
this answer key doesnt make snese to me
because my first though would be to use product rule but that answer doesnt make sense to me
Using the product rule is right, which is what they tried to do here, but incorrectly
can i show you my work to check real quick?
sure
ok give me a sec sorry dont wait up for me if you have others to help
It's all good I'll see it
Looks good
photomath gives me some weird shit
The goal is just to find the derivative?
ye
Then I'd say you're done
I mean, you could distribute the 5, or factor out a sec(theta)
But neither form is better than what you've already got
alright thanks
Sure thing
im all good now
You can use .close to close the channel if you want
Otherwise a bot will bug you about it later lol
.close
Closed by @unique tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't even know how to start here... seems like there is missing some important information
it might help to know that the sample is hypergeometrically distributed
since its sampling without replacement
I've never heard about that...
But lets assume i'd know what that is, what would the parameter K be in my case?
alright so
this is an example from wikipedia
wait are youre x_i's bernoulli?
i might have made a mistake
idk maybe...
Gijs
Is there a simple definition of "one dimensional marginal distribution"?
@worthy briar Has your question been resolved?
@worthy briar Has your question been resolved?
@worthy briar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, i just need clarification on quadratic equations, any trick so i cant forget the quadratic formula?
aye aye
wassup
practice
secret formula
is that
or
wanna listen
to a song?
I got a catchy one
No?
Oh ok
A song about the quadratic formula. You can memorize the whole formula and also understand the proof.
Also on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/track/58wC7hkQ7qoyXkZh3Rivkm
For more content in English subscribe to "TheGermanFox": https://www.youtube.com/TheGermanFox
This is my first attempt to write a song about mathematics in english. I alre...
Woah
Closed by @quaint crescent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can somene tell me if I'm missing something. is this factor incorrect?
Why are you doing -2 + 4?
When you expand, it's 3x * -2 + 4 * x = -2x
what is the $?
Supposed to be x, opps
and how did a -2x get on the other side
By simplifying the left side
This algebra video tutorial shows you how to factor trinomials in the form ax2+bx+c when a, the leading coefficient, is not 1. It shows you how to use the ac method to factor such trinomials that contain 3 terms which involves factoring polynomials by grouping. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems for you to work on. E...
oh I see, is their a different way of facotirng when a does not equal 0?
Here's a good video to watch for factoring when a is not 1
Closed by @pastel roost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so if the denominator is neg and im trying to equal equations on both side would i need to m8ultiply by a neg denominator both sides?
example 2= 2/-4
yea
Actually here’s a better example
x/-6 = 3
To solve for x, multiply both sides by -6
so yea, muti by a neg denominator right
Ye
Or u could just multi by pos denom then in the next step, multi both sides by -1 but that’s the same thing
@fickle remnant Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
are tangent lines intersecting?
helloooo
so if two parabolas are touching at their vertexes
are they considered intersecting
it's another question but I was just wondering
I can close it and it'll reopen
or you can use another free channel
thanks @summer vale
.close
Closed by @eager finch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
npnp
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ik this is right but why? according to discrete math rules
@nimble frost Has your question been resolved?
@nimble frost Has your question been resolved?
@nimble frost Has your question been resolved?
In classical logic, a hypothetical syllogism is a valid argument form, a syllogism with a conditional statement for one or both of its premises.
An example in English:
If I do not wake up, then I cannot go to work.
If I cannot go to work, then I will not get paid.
Therefore, if I do not wake up, then I will not get paid.The term originated with...
@nimble frost Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Whats the asymptote of the blue function?
what are your thoughts on it?
sth. like -0.5x+0.5
didn't you get the equation of the graph earlier?
oh the diagonal one
a line that the function never touches, it can be upside down, left to right and diagonal
yea
misonception
function can touch/intersect with stuff like horizontal and slant asymptotes infinitely many times
anyway
didn't you get the equation of the graph earlier?
yes but I didn't got the explanation of the equation
were you told the equation in the book?
What would be a function that touches an asymptote 10 times?
no from a forum
,w graph sin(x)/x
whats the asymptote here?
has an asymptote of y=0 but the graph crosses the x-axis infinitenly many times
yeah it is
its easy to find with polynomial division
if u do polynomial division on f(x)
youll get some linear function + remainder
and the linear function will be the asymptote
works for this where the degree of the denominator is one less than the numerator one
whats with the rest?
\polyset{%
style=C,
delims={\big(}{\big)},
div=:
}
[
\polylongdiv{6x^2-7x+6}{4-8x}
]
whats with what rest
/\
you leave the remainder
the asymptote will be the quotient without remainder
so see how the linear function formed by the first two terms there
and how do I get from -0.75x + 0.5
plus the informations that f(0) = 1.5
and 1 vertical asymptote at y = 0.5
to this:
what have you managed to gather from that info
I don't understand that function
wait I know that that the demoninator for x = 0.5 has to be 0
yeah
and the function has to be f(0) = 1.5
6/4 = 1.5
or 3/2 = 1.5
but why does this function not work?
the line isnt an asymptote
because it has to tend to -0.75x+0.5 as x tends to infinity
two informations
f(0) = 1.5
and vertical asymptote at y = 0.5
third information is -0.75x+0.5
considering
its relatively the intended asymptote of the blue graph will be y= -3x/4 + 0.5
the greatest power terms on the numerator and denominator of this function have to have a ratio of -3x/4
now they have, but why -7x ?
<@&268886789983436800>
from drawing the asymptote the slant asymptote on the graph, it would be safe to assume that the slant asymptote will be $y= -\frac{3x}{4} + 0.5$ \
from the vertical asymptote, you function can be expressed in the form
$$y = -\frac{3x}{4} + 0.5 + \frac{c}{2x - 1}$$
from the $y$ intercept of 1.5, the value of $c$ can be determine to be $-1$, hence
$$y = -\frac{3x}{4} + 0.5 - \frac{1}{2x - 1}$$
ℝamonov
its fine to just leave this as it is
combining these three terms into a single fraction will result in what they had
no its not fine, i need to know how to get from this
to this
combining these three terms into a single fraction will result in what they had
very simple
basic fraction addition, lcd etc
i see
yeah, i can confirm that these terms combine to get the f(x) there.
seems to be about it for the blue function
Closed by @cedar quarry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I do this
i first tried using expansion fo the cubic on the top
and I got (sinx + cosx) ( 1 - sinxcosx) all over sinx + cosx
but that's no tthe answer
i need to prove the identity
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
im trying to prove the identity
how can I prove this?
Yes, i know, $\frac{(\sin x +\cos x)(1-\sin x\cos x)}{\sin x +\cos x}=1-\sin x +\cos x$ is true for $\sin x + \cos x\neq 0$
waler
You were heading in the right path home, but you suddenly decided to stop right at the door of your house and ran away
ok
look
it becomes 1 - (1-sinxcosx)/(sinx + cosx)
right
what does the left side simplify to
No, of course not
To the right side.....
$\frac{ab}{a}=b$ for $a\neq0$
Where a and b can be any kind of expression in any terms
Not just numbers
waler
ok
Typo there, be careful
but i get rid of the denominator
and the left side of the numerator
im left with 1 + sinxcosx != 1 + sinx + cosx
Huh?
Take a really careful look at what im writing here
$\frac{(\sin x +\cos x)(1-\sin x\cos x)}{\sin x +\cos x}=1-\sin x \cos x$ is true for $\sin x +\cos x\neq 0$
I get it now
This is what I meant, excuse me
Oh wait i fixed the wrong bit
waler
Right, excuse my attempt to latex on phone 
idk prob start with the sin^2 +cos^2 =1
where do u get the sin^2x + cos^2x
Did you mean cos^2(x)?
Because that equation is not true in general
isit idk i always assume its true when ppl said to prove
do u memorise trig stuff T.T
Well not everything, that's a common identity to remember
yes
how do I do it
or is there no way
i can only manipulate one side of the equation
im not allowed to do both
Like i said, was there a typo?
If not you can not prove that it is true in general
God my head is not working right
yea its prob not always true
It is not, like i said
Ah, indeed so, it is not cos^4(x)
Yes everything looks good
(Note that you wrote sin^4(x) here, and not sin^2(x) like above)
I need help on (cotx - cscx)(cosx+1) = sin(-x)
I got -sin^2x/sinx ultimately
but that equals to 1, not sin(-x)
a^2/a=a assuming a!=0
Sin^2(x)/sin(x) is sin(x)
bri
bRH
but it's -sinx tho
that's not even
even function is f(-x) = f(x)
not f(-x) = -f(x)
nvm
There is a - infront of that....
why did this skip to pi(n)
Are you familiar with the general solutions form of trig equations?
Yes, now for sin(x)=0, this is quite a special case
So technically, our two general solutions is x=2kpi and pi+2kpi, where k is in Z
ok
But, we can also simplify this, as in, rewrite the set of solutions
Note that 2kpi is just a full rotation around the circle, starting at 0 rad, as for pi+2kpi, its pretty much the same thing but starting from pi rads
So this is technically just us starting from 0 rad and doing half a circle rotation
Which means, we can write it as npi, where n is another parameter in Z
Also note that it does not matter what we use, k, n, a, b, c, just as long as you remember to say they are integers
can u explain how this equals to the bottom?
sin^2(theta)=1-cos^2(theta)
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
i don't understand symbolab's explanation
why would 1-cos(2x)/2 be equal to sin^2x
which identity is this
Double angle formula and then Pythagorean identity
I think so
yes
how else do u write it
If you use the definitions csc(x) = 1/sin(x), cot(x) = cos(x)/sin(x) and sec(x) = 1/cos(x), you can plug them into the LHS of the equation, rearrange terms and easily get to the RHS
Do you want me to show you the calculations?
i got it
@tranquil pine
make all the terms in sin and cos
u will get ur answer in 1 sec

I think the difficulty of this problem is knowing the definitions of csc, cot and sec, but just ask WolframAlpha for the definitions (I did so too)
but how do u write it
bruh
csc(x) = 1/sin(x)
yes
pi means its in radians
bro i know
then?
that's not the question
why is it just pi/2 + 2pin
there's another one at 3pi(n)
it didn't include that in part A
because that's equivalent to what you said
yes
pi/2 + 2pi(n) is the same as pi/2 + pi(n)?
its hit and try bruh
No like every term of the form pi/2 + pi(n) is either expressable as pi/2+2pi(n) or 3pi/2+2pi(n)
It's right so far. Now notice the nominator to be (1-cos(x))/sin(x) and the denominator to be (1-cos(x))/cos(x). Then you can just divide the two fractions and arrive at the answer
Sorry that I didn't TeX it, I was too lazy to type backslash and dollar symbols at my mobile keyboard
Swap nominator and denominator of the second fraction and then multiply
nice
how do I make a triangle for this
i need to use this to solve for sin(2x) so i first need to make a triangle
which quadrant do i kniw this will be in
The first one because both cos(x)>0 and sin(x)>0
what are these called and where acn I learn this?
You know the definition of sin and cos on the unit circle, right? Then you can just picture it
If you want to do trig graphically, always have the picture of the unit circle in mind
But I don't know whether this has a name
But if you want to solve this equation for sin(2x), you don't need to picture it. You can just use double angle formula and trigonometric pythagorean theorem
yes
ik
i just need to know where the quadrant is
is there a pattern that I can memorize?
i forgot what it's called
it's like sin > 0 cos > 0 = 1, sin <0 cos <1 = 4
or something
sin>0, cos>0 => 1st quadrant
sin>0, cos<0 => 2nd quadrant
sin< 0, cos< 0 => 3rd quadrant
sin<0, cos>0 => 4th quadrant
what is the sine and cosine in this case?
What do you mean?
im stuck on cscx = 5/2
if tanx < 0
like
where's the cosine and sine
there's only 1/sine
where's the cosine
i don't get it
what's this type of problem called so I can go watch Youtube?
Do you mean this problem?
If $\frac{1}{\sin x} > 0$, then $\sin x > 0$
Mathemaddict
Yes because it's $\frac{1}{7}$, that's greater than zero
Mathemaddict
Then it's either the first or the third quadrant because tan is sin over cos
But to solve the problem from above, you don't need this
Right
It gives you a unique solution. Normally you have infinitely many solutions because of periodicity
how do I draw my triangle
Why would you do this with a triangle?
which quadrant is the triangle?
how do I tell??
Mathemaddict
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
im so confused
ok this is 3rd quadrant but how do i put the points
tanx = 1/5
it becomes sinx/cosx = 1/5
how do I put that on the triangle to get the 3rd side?
If you have angles $x \in [0,2\pi]$, then the first quadrant is $x \in [0, \frac{\pi}{2}]$, the second is $x \in [\frac{\pi}{2}, \pi]$, third is $x \in [\pi, \frac{3\pi}{2}],$ and the fourth is $x \in [\frac{3\pi}{2}, 2\pi]$
bruh lol
Sorry, I always accidentally hit enter
You have $\sin^2 x + \cos^2 x = 1$ and $\cos x = 5\sin x$. You can plug in the second equation into the first one to get the sine.
wdym 2nd equation
where's the 2nd equation
I mean $\cos x = 5\sin x$. You get it from $\cot x = 5$.
Mathemaddict
And where's the problem? It's correct
do i need to do one for cosine too?
If you have $26 \sin^2 x = 1$, then you have the sine, you can get the cosine by taking 5 times the sine, and then you can just use double angle formula for getting $\sin 2x$ and $\cos 2x$.
Mathemaddict
I think you should try it yourself and I should not give away a complete solution
Weird, I don't see the mistake
Oh, I didn't write anything up, but it might be because you did not consider the fact that we are in the third quadrant, so sine and cosine are both negative
Oh
Anyways, I don't have time now, need to leave
@tranquil pine Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @radiant yew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yeah
ah
Don't know why, or how
nah
alr so
ig u just subtract them
u get
for starters
I THINK
$-x^2 +3x -(2x^3 -\frac{1}{4}x^2)$
Springsskateboard
Yeah, I think I can do that
but how'd you get this is what i'm confused about
so
I just took the first polynomial
and subtracted it using the
second one
they didn’t exactly
specify
so ye
npnp
@zinc dune Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, can someone help with this? I've been learning about it but this problem is kinda different from the other ones I have completed and I'm a little confused on how to start it
Closed by @unreal hemlock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Where did I go wrong here?
@patent flame Has your question been resolved?
@patent flame Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @patent flame
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I show that this converges?
I'm guessing that it's with monotone-bounded, but idk how to show that it's monotone
a1=1/2
obviously its bounded but idk how to get it to be monotone
study this :
$$f(x) = \sin\left(\frac{x\pi}{3} + \frac{\pi}{6} \right)$$
Herels
derivative, variation, blabla
huh
I guess I can use monotonicity of sin and prove it by induction
sin monotone on x in [0,pi/2]
But that feels like cheating, since we haven’t defined trig functions yet
Any ideas outside of that?
@unique jolt Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @unique jolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anyone have any good resources to understand vector spaces? Just reached that section in the textbook and not rlly understanding much
if I recall correctly a vector space just needs to satisfy scalar multiplication and vector addiction, yeah? And they have to be closed under those operations.
So for example, you would need to be able to do a in V, b in V, and show that a + b in V and for a in V, then ca in V for some real number c
@fathom walrus Has your question been resolved?
Hmm, that’s what I didn’t rlly understand. “a in V” and “b in V” and the other highlighted texts
It also had some 10 rules for vector spaces or smth that was kinda confusing
Yep that’s it
yeah so they just stem from those addition and scalar multiplication properties
So let's take an example here
let's say we set our space to be the following:
$V = {<x, y> : x \geq 0, y\geq 0}$
MellowDramaLlama
here <x, y> is a 2 by 1 matrix like so:
| x |
| y |
so would this be a vector space?
well no
we can tell because scalar multiplicaton is not closed for all c in the reals
since, let's say that c= -1, then our vector would be <-x, -y> ,but x and y have to be positive or 0
Wait a second, sorry to interrupt but I haven’t don’t anything with vectors being matrixes
We just started the vector unit
well a vector is a 2 x 1 matrix 🙂
O
but 2 x 1 is easy to play with
So what differentiates a vector from a vector space
Is a vector space like a plane or smth
Where many vectors can exist
Or am I totally off
so a vector space is where vectors can "live" if that makes sense
So like a 2d plane?
Your intuition is good
yep!
it's not as bad as it seems huh? The vector space will be defined in some way, and you have to ensure that it's closed under vector addition and scalar multiplication
oh and it must contain the 0 vector
or <0, 0, .... , 0> depending on how big your vectors are 🙂
Got it
so closed means that you do something to two vectors and that something is still a vector
for example
the integers are closed under addition
meaning
if you take two integers, say a and b and you add them together
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
....okay lol
.reopen
✅
do you get a non-integer or an integer?
Integer
bingo!
so integers are closed under addition
there's no way to add two integers and get a non-integer
So what would be a case in which u would do something to 2 vectors and it’s not a vector anymore?
so, let's say for example we had something like this:
$V = {<x, 2> : x \in \mathbb{R}}$
how take two vectors in this space and add them together
what do you get?
MellowDramaLlama
MellowDramaLlama
<x1 + x2, 4>
Yes, bc still a vector
no
O
because vectors of V are of hte form <x, 2>
we can't have 4 in the second row
it has to be 2
so this isn't a vector space since we can't add two vectors and be closed under addition in V
Wait a sec
yep! And a 4 is not a 2
O wait that’s not a vector
O
it's still a space, just not a vector space
Why must this be true
because we defined it so here.
Ohh that’s what that meant
yep!
I thought that was u accidentally not completing the problem lol, mb
yeah no worries
V can be anything that involves playing with vectors
but it just has to hold the addition and scalar multiplication and those to be closed to be a vector space
also, <0,0> is not in V
Because 0 is not 2
If we had <x,y> XER would this be in our vector space
MellowDramaLlama
since this is R^2
R^2 means 2D right
yep 🙂
So why isn’t <x,y> 2D
aka dimension
Ah ok
So then what’s the reason for this
Was it what I said abt being too broad and not specific enough?
nah it's not so much broad, it's just trivial because it's a natural vector space to work with. You've been doing it this whole time whether you realize it or not lol
trivial in this case means kind of "oh well duh yeah of course that's a vector space"
Oh gotcha
<0, 0> is in it, <x, y> + <a, b> = <x + a, y + b>, and c<x, y> = <cx, cy> for some real number c
yep! it meets the 10 conditions above
So what would be a case in which u would do something to 2 vectors in the Vector space and it’s not a vector anymore?
Or is it solely that vectors will stay vectors, but vector spaces may not stay vector spaces phylactery
hmm
good question. I can't think of anything that would kick you out of being a vector from just addition and multiplication
so I'll say no
vectors will stay vectors in their spaces
now if they go through some kind of function/transformation, then yes they can turn from vectors to just plain matricies and change rank
which you'll learn about later
like you can turn a 2 x 1 matrix into a 2 x 2 matrix with a function, but that's outside of the scope for now
I see, yea that sounds pretty interesting
which is just a linear combination of vectors at that point
