#help-28
1 messages · Page 131 of 1
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What am I doing wrong?
this is the formula i was going off of
and 85/pi * ((4/5)pi)/2 = 34 so idk what went wrong
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @atomic zodiac
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@blazing dust Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @blazing dust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I get the radius is 24 in, and I think I can use the equation $\omega=\frac{\theta}{t}$ to solve this since t is one hour, but I have no idea what $\theta$ is
Matt
also I dont get why I need to be converting it to inches when its asking for it in radians
$\theta=\frac dr$
Garlik Bred von Friese
how does that work? theta can vary depending on the angle
theta can either be 1anything from 0 to 360 degrees wat
how can you get theta from dividing the diameter by radius
it goes 50 mph
ok but the question doesnt tell me how far the truck goes
so idk if i can use that yk
@twilit leaf
could i just use $w=\frac{v}{r}$ since it tells me the linear speed which is 50mi/h
Matt
but idk how id turn it into radians
the problem says "hint convert to inches/minutes"
but the final answer asks for radians
Dont worry about rads yet
$\omega=\frac{50}{24}$
Matt
dont know how this answers the questionn tho
Units
50 miles on top
and 24 inchs on bottom
$\omega=\frac{3168000}{24}$ ok both are in inches now
Matt
$\omega = \frac{50 \frac{miles}{hour}}{24 \frac{inches}{radius}}$
Garlik Bred von Friese
$\omega = \frac{3168000 \frac{inches}{hour}}{24 \frac{inches}{radius}}$
Matt
i converted it to inches but idk what else to do
Start cancelling and dividing things
$\omega=132000$
Matt
UNITS
$\omega = 132000 \frac{rad}{hour}$
Garlik Bred von Friese
why the units on the side tho?
do you think you can get it into rad/min?
wdym
nvm i get it
yes just divide it by 60 but how did you go from inches to radians?
thats what im confused about mostly
like it was inches, then it skipped to radians
How many inches are in a radius
for this question its 24
Yeah, so you plug it in
ohh since its in inches (and since the radius is 24 inches), the miles were converted to inches and divided by the radius amounnt which turned it into radians
hopefully the way im thinking about it is correct
Yeah
v is (distance unit/time unit) and r is (distance unit/radius) so v/r is (radii/time unit)
i see
and then when you divide it by 60, that would be the angular speed in rad/min
right?
You can imagine multiplying by the conversion unit (1hour/60min)
ok i see
and to convert this to revolutionns per minute i think id just divide this by 2pi right?
Yes, you can imagine multiplying by the conversion unit (1rev/2pi rad)
Closed by @atomic zodiac
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Youre welcome
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have no idea how to solve this or how to get started
I was considering using $v=\frac{s}{t}$ to solve this but im not given an arc length so i have no idea how to find v
Matt
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @atomic zodiac
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Knowing that now, how can I solve for the in/min
Calculate the circumfrence of the wheel.
the formula for that is $2\pi r$ so $2\cdot\pi\cdot6=37.6991118431$
Matt
how does that help me tho?
🗿 I said wheel not gear
Matt
@sullen parrot is that better?
Find gear ratio
Keep this aside
so its 2
2 to 1 yeah
To find Wheel rpm:
Wheel rpm = Pedal rpm * Gear ratio
Plug in the value and keep it aside
175 * 2 = 350
Good!
Next, Linear speed in inches per minute:
Linear speed = Circumference * Wheel rpm
350 * 50.2654824574 = 17592.9188601
what is this formula tho? i thought linear speed = arc length / time
Linear speed = (angular speed) * (radius)
Angular speed = (pedaling speed in rpm) * (2π)
and whats the formula for this?
how did you knnow wheel rpm = pedal rpm * gear ratio
so your steps were
- find the wheel circumference
- find the gear ratio
- find wheel rpm by multiplying pedal rpm and gear ratio
- find linear speed by multiplying wheel rpm and circumference
ngl now I am confused myself
Closed by @atomic zodiac
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
we arent doing calculus and its way above my experise but it kinda looks like the limit definition of a derivative
yeah i know but
i need help finding the function f(x) =
- was easy
oh wait
i think i can do something with the number 5
oh ok it makes sense now
since h is the change between two points
and the change is going away as h approches 0
so + 205 must be
9(5) - 10(5)^2
but since we're using f(5), we should change it to f(x)
and get 9x - 10x^2
.close
Closed by @tacit rapids
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
there's no B :(
i think it should be 1
That's correct
D:
cause if the ratio is 1, then the sum of some positive number by itself infinite times is arbitrarily large
if the ratio is greater than one, the sum is similarly arbitrarily large. thus divergence
why so :(
@blazing dust Shit i can't read, saw convegent and jumped to answer choices. Yeah, it's 1 wtf am i doing
oh. all good then. yay!
yeah it's wrong. Anime girl is right
May I know the reason?
good reasoning
anime girl haha. well the reason is here
In a series convergence and divergence can possible at one time?
You didn't mention convergence
no it's not possible. it's just they are saying given those conditions they will diverge instead. i think the question is worded badly yea
the convergence mentioned earlier is.. irrelevant.
They are talking about only one series
Yes irrevalent thing made it difficult
Un+1/un >=1 divergence by ratio test
Un+1/un<1 converge
yea just badly worded
Maybe in settings
.close
Closed by @blazing dust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
Where are you in the process?
bro i didnt do nothing
Well, I'm not gonna churn out the answer for you
Ok, so tell me the locations of the two points in the form (x,y). Then, can you remind me what step 4 stands for?
@junior veldt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Which book covers these topics?
Looks like differential equations
@blazing dust Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont understand what's happening in the second step
sir said it was via binomial expansion, but i dont get it
Context for this question?
oh also value of x is very small
i dont understand how that works
So here
What we generall mean by x is small is
It is very small as compared to the other term in addition or subtraction
So
Do you agree
(100000)²
(100000 + 0.001)² = (100000.001)²
Do not have much difference in them?
yes
As the second term is very small
Yes but option?
?
yea i understand how that part works. i didnt understand how the "power is being brought into multiplication"
Yeah so refer to the image
You must also know
When a number is less than 1
Its square is less than 1 too and also lesser than the original number
Positive integers im talking about
Discord glitch
so
(½)² = ¼
yea so x^n is even smaller, gotcha
Yeah
Now refering to the image
The second and third line is the correct binomial expansion
There
You see for the second and third term we get x² and x³
Now as you know x² is a very small value
The whole term tends to zero
And similarly thereafter
So all that remains (significant portion) is the first term
(1 +nx)
ohh okay i get it now
So all done?
Yep
Cuz they make the term very very small
Think of x as small
Then x² is doubly small
x³ is too small
They multiply to anything to just give a valuevery near to zero
Thats why we only consider till the x term
.close
Closed by @shell dawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could you say then when N>2 that the expresion can be represented where (5x5)^n-1 and any odd integer x another odd integer = odd integer and the only odd multiples of 5 are numbers that end with a 5?
um sure
but here it says ends with 25, not 5
also, and the only odd multiples of 5 are numbers that end with a 5?
youve to probably show this as well if you want to use it
oh, then could you just indicate the prime factorization of 25?
how would you show that other than using an example?
i also thought it said it ended with 5
well lets go back to the question
try showing it with induction
the base case being n=2
so 5 ^ 2 = 25
then you do 5^n+1
Im kinda lost
im thinking o expressing 5^n+1 = 0 ( mod 25)
and 5^2 = 0 (mod 25)
which could potentially allow us to sub in 25a somewhere therefore its a divisor??
OK use induction
Base Case n = 2
Inductive step n=k
Now prove for n=k+1
A big hint is
||5^k = 25 mod 100||
||multiply both side by 5 boom||
ahh
when yo multiply the right side by 5 what happens
does nothing change?
125 mod 100 is?
Closed by @loud moth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
👍
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
It’s just another angle, no?
I know it’s an angle but I just can’t solve this question
I believe you use conservation of energy here, alongside work
yes you do but I can’t get the right answer
to resolve the perpendicular you do 0.5g x cos angle
but in the workings they just do 0.5g x 24/25
Idk why
what is the numerical answer provided?
@pale fog Has your question been resolved?
What is the final answer to the question?
0/5586….
I’m lost here now and I don’t get the boxed bit
.close
Closed by @pale fog
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi can someone help me with question c plz i cannot figure out how to write it in that way
pure 3 in 8th of jan
scary shit
how did 4root192 become 32 root 3
root of 192 is 8 root 3
4 x 8 = 32 therefore 32 root 3
RIGHT
thanks man appreciate it 😉
@deep sinew Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm struggling with finding the upper bound and lower bound for x and y for y^2>2x>0
Do I draw a graph first?
anyone please help me with this question-Consider that a, b, c, d are positive real numbers satisfying (a + c)(b + d) = ac + bd.
Find the smallest possible value of S=a/b+b/c+c/d+d/a
@golden igloo the channel is occupied
Did u legitimately post this in every channel
Dude that's just rude
(and against the rules)
Wow did he?
yeah lol
😭
(also, very sorry, I'm not nearly good enough to understand your question, I just happened to be here)
It's okay I just don't know how to draw the inequality y^2>2x>0
I don't know how to find the region
so where to ask any question, actually I am new to this server
Closed by @limpid monolith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Encrypt in Z29 the number 10 with encryption function E (x) = 7x + 18. Then determine the decryption function D(y) and decrypt the number 8.
I think I already solved decryption but I’d love some advice on how to actually remember
Encrypting 10 with the function gives me d = 7*10+18
So the function becomes
[7*10+18] mod(29) =1
[88] mod(29) =1
[1] mod(29) = 1
Which should be the solution to encryption? But what about decryption?

Assumedly the decryption function is basically the inverse of E(x) and so you just need to work on "undoing" it, noting you're in Z29?
So any "division" is instead finding the multiplicative inverse mod(29)

Why the sad cat thumbs up 
sorry hijack but where does it say the D(y) is the inverse of E(x)? i remember that the professor said this but how would you prove it
[well here I'm assuming that it should be, else otherwise "it wouldn't be encryption" - the idea is that if you encrypt something, then decrypt it, you get the original "message" back]
[As for proving it's the inverse, you'd just want to show that D(E(x)) = x]
HOW should I know this 😭
Did they like not explain that before? 
No we have different teachers, my teacher spoke Bulgarian so I don’t understand him.

D(7x+18) = …?
vilken del är det du inte fattar?
Well, maybe let me "change" the question a tiny bit for a second
Forget modular arithmetic for a moment, and anything in it
Just as a real function, can you find the inverse of the function f(x) = 7x + 18 for me please?
x= -18/7
that's a single point, I meant more like
Rearrange y = 7x + 18 to get x by itself? 
Yep, that's it 
Now, remember how I said this here 
So if instead I asked you to find this inverse mod(29), rather than dividing by 7, you'd need the multiplicative inverse of 7 mod 29
I’m glad I know what Modular inverses is then
That's kind of what you want to find, so like in this case you want a solution $d$ to $7d \equiv 1 \mod(29)$
@devout valley
Why 7?
bc E(x) = 7x
That's pretty much saying you want to solve $7d + 29k = 1$ (but you don't really care about what $k$ is too much)
@devout valley
we need to find the coefficient inverse of 7 i guess
E(x) is 7x + 18
yeah but 18 is not important
the hard part is the coefficient in front of the variable
Remember it's 7 you want the multiplicative inverse of (luckily here actually solving isn't too hard!)
Ok..
I promise it'll make more sense in the end
remember that the multiplicative inverse of 7 is basically our "dividing by 7" in mod(29) - land 
but our professor was like
since [7*4]mod29 = [1]mod29
we want to find [-1] mod 29
so he just said it has to be [-4]mod29
is this really how one should generally approach these types of questions
Well I mean trying to solve this one with the Euclidean algorithm basically tells you that: you know that 29 = 7(4) + 1, so 29 + 7(-4) = 1 and then reducing that mod(29) gives you that [7][-4] = [1]
Assumedly they meant [-1] here? 7 * 4 is 28
but I feel like I would've done it like
29 = 4(7) +1 instead of putting the 7 there
it's the same thing i guess, but it's beacuse I don't "know" that I have [-4]mod29 yet if that makes sense?
i know im computing in base29 and i know 7 is my encryption key from the function correct?
As in you were trying to find [d] as [-4]?
Yep you do 
As long as you can get to finding the inverse, that's like the most important thing (is that alright at least?)
tl;dr can you e.g. solve that 7d + 29k = 1 from before?
yeah i understand it
solve for d or k?
i assume d since decrypt?
d = 1/7 - 29k/7
Well both, using the Euclidean algorithm, remember the stuff you were doing earlier
You want d and k as integers, so like remember how you keep doing the division and then reverse the steps at the end
dio equations ?
So like you know how e.g. 29 = 7(4) + 1 of course (and wow life is comfy!)
Where did you get 29k from?
sorry 
d(7) = 1 mod 29
29 = 4(7) + 1 <- thi remaining 1 is equivalent to 1 mod 29 when d=4
but since we are looking for inverse d=-4 instead of 4? so i just make it negative?
The idea is that you want $7d \equiv 1 \mod (29)$, so like you know, for example, the difference $(7d - 1)$ should be divisible by 29
@devout valley
Honeslty i can't even remember how to do that anymore..
And you know that 29 is equivalent to 0 mod 29, so you basically get $0 \equiv 4(7) + 1 \mod(29)$, so rearranging that gets you that $-4(7) \equiv 1 \mod(29)$
@devout valley
That's why you choose d = -4
damn how would i have known
but yeah i get it then
so i can 'move things' around as i like?
to see things more clearly if that makess sense
Yep, you can, rearranging mostly works "the same" as "normal" numbers
Awww
this one is a bit easier at least to deal with
oh yeah i see it now
let's say d = 4
4(7) = 1 mod 29
28 = 1 mod 29 (not valid)
-4(7) = 1 mod 29 (valid)

I'm attempting another to see if i can understand it that way
n = 93
E(x) = x^e mod(93)
Determine decryptionkey for d with encryption e = 43
I know that the encryptionfunction e = x^e mod 93
e * d = x^e mod 93?
Where e = 43
idk
i'm fucked
E(x) = x^43 mod 93
would be my only guess..
This is true, that is the encryption function
okay hold on
So if i want to decrypt
i'll require the inverse of encryption E(x)
D(x) = 43sqrt(-93) ?
Well you would be like trying to solve if I recall right e * d = 1 mod(phi(93))
phi..
like how am i supposed to know that
e*d = 1 mod(93)
where e was 43
43*d mod (93) = 1 mod(93)
Euler’s function
Yeah i haven't covered Eulers yet
wonder how they’re expecting you to cover RSA decryption and finding the decryption key then
From the way I covered it you basically needed it to find the decryption key from the encryption one
idk
The course book and my teacher went through RSA before eueler
so i'm required to know euler to get rsa ?
Well at least the way we learned it seemed to heavily imply you do, let me check 
Well I mean you don't strictly need it fully, seems like
how did they explain it to you?
did u watch the vid i sent you on rsa encryption? they showed you that to get the n you need to use eulers
My teacher didn't explain anything, we have to learn on our own
From online or coursebook
phi(n) = (p-1)(q-1) is that the part with Euler?
Yep that is
basically as long as you have that
pretty "wonderful" of them 
Hi!
Yeah like 2/3 of my class just stopped going to his lectures because he couldn't speak english and his swedish was awful
So i basically only could rely on online
the last part here
kollar om den atm
That's one way to teach independence I guess... not a preferred way imo 
that isn't phi, is it?
@devout valley
it isn't but at least the places I've seen it use that one haha
I'm glad my teacher depict phi as a straight vertical line through an o 
Doesn't matter its name, what it does is more important 
It does, all you really need to worry about at least here is that phi(pq) is (p-1) * (q-1) to be fair
(there are some other properties that it has, but meh
)
Okay so if i understand it correctly.
If we have the encryption key, e then we need to do a Extended Euclidean Algorithm?
Based of this
d * e = 1 mod phi(n)
That's like the idea, you pick the encryption key then use the extended Euclidean algorithm and then that gets you the decryption key
[This is a similar idea to the last question: d is the multiplicative inverse of e mod(phi(n))]
I don't get that last part
In my case
n = 93
E(x) = x^e mod 93
e = 43
d * e = 1 mod phi(n)
d * 43 = 1 mod (93)
that should be correct
Yea, that's what you're solving, you want to find d
Are you happy with them getting to d = -17 = 23 mod40, or was that the bit you don't get?
I don't get anything
i'm only guessing so far
only intuitive guesses
based of yt videos
like i'm supposed to remember all this as well by heart since nothing we go through right now will be permitted aid on the exam
so i have to remember
p =
q =
n = p * q
F = (p-1)(q-1)
d = decryption key
e = encryption key
d * e = 1 mod(n)
I think that's all?
Pretty much yep, you pick p and q randomly (and prime), find the rest, and then you pick your encryption key e and use that to find the decryption key d from d * e = 1 mod(phi(n))
n is pq, but phi(n) = (p-1)(q-1)
ok!
so when i'm given an encryption function
E(x) = x^e mod 93
uh
let me think
nah nu clue what i'm doing
lol
can't even guess myself to the answer
it is a bit pain 
runnning out of time aswell
so if n = 93 and i need F, how do i go about doing that?
Don't even know what they are
Well, 93 is 3 * 31, so then your F is then (3 - 1) * (31 - 1) = 2 * 30 = 60
definitely worth going over if you can
might make stuff much easier
Tl;dr they're basically the equivalent of "how you divide" as per before
ed = 1 mod phi(n)
where n = 93
e = 43
E(x) = x^e mod 93
phi(n) = F
right?
F = 60
Yep to all 
So uh
$ed \equiv 1 mod phi(n) \implies 43*d \equiv 1 mod(60)$
idk how to make the =
with another -
\equiv 
Merineth
Yep, that's the whole "multiplicative inverses" thing
Solving this
Pretty much, as per before, you're basically solving 43d + 60k = 1
$60 = 1 * 43 + 17 \
43 = 2 * 17 + 9 \
17 = 1 * 9 + 8\
9 = 1* 8 +1$
Merineth
How do you know this?
e.g. you want 43d to have remainder 1 when you divide it by 60, so for example you want 43d to be 1 more than some multiple of 60
That's then equivalent to trying to solve the equation 43d + 60k = 1
how do you know that
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
like it doesn't say that anywhere in the book
fml
what do they have in your book? 
honestly i woulnd't be able to translate it because i can barely read it in swedish
pain 
How does the video here explain it then? 
Asymmetric Part 2 - RSA includes tutorial on how to encrypt and decrypt as well as calculating the keys and euclidean algorithm.
as far as i could tell
she didn't cover it
but i prooooobably am worng
About 7:07 does it 
Well kind of, with "m" for message and "c" for ciphertext, so like c^d is the process of decrypting the ciphertext c under RSA to recover the "original message" m
ignore me then haha
But basically c is what you have encrypted, m is the original, and encrypting and decrypting are "opposites" of each other!
do you think if i remember those two formulas
i'll be fine?
to solve other similar quesitons with RSA
or do i have to remember the de = 1 mod phi(n) also?
You need these here too
But that alongside this, and...
...this, that's pretty much all you need!
p =
q =
n = p * q
F = (p-1)(q-1)
d = decryption key
e = encryption key
d * e = 1 mod(n)
c = m^e mod n
m = c^d mod n
so this total?
Yep 
it's CRAAAAAAAAAAZY that we aren't provided this info hahah
that we have to remember it by heart
Q.Q
I will try and find another RSA question and attempt it
one momendito
yeaa that's pretty pain
had to memorize that and damn, ouch 

I'm gonna do the first one then
Encrypt in Z29 the number 10 with encryption function E(x) = 7x + 18. Then determine the decryption function D(y) and decrypt the number 8.
Oh yea 
You should hopefully be a bit happier with solving something like $7m \equiv 1 \mod(29)$ hopefully!
@devout valley
Not for this one nope 
Remember you're trying to find an m such that you have the above
29 = 4 * 7 + 1
would be my solemn guess
so
1 = 29 - 4*7
1 = 29 -28
so m is 28?
how did you come up with this? @devout valley
that is not how i would've guessed
oooooh
Because that's what's in front of 7 
Yep, so then, to reverse it, you basically have like
$[y] = [7x + 18]$, so $[y] - [18] = [y] + [11] = [7x]$ (noting that 29 - 18 = 11)
@devout valley
So then because [7x] = [7][x], you "divide by 7" (which is of course multiplying by the inverse of [7], which is [-4])
I'm not sure i have enough time to process this, learn it before the exam tbh and fully solve an exam question revolving RSA
That then gets you that $[-4][y + 11] = [-4][7][x] = [-4 * 7][x]$, which is basically telling you that $[x] = [-4][y + 11]$ and all
@devout valley
Awww
can be quite a bit to learn, though of course worth noting that the inverses thing is kinda the same thing in RSA anyway 
Encrypt in Z29 the number 10 with encryption function E(x) = 7x + 18. Then determine the decryption function D(y) and decrypt the number 8.
If i were given this
i would probably
p =
q =
n = p * q
F = (p-1)(q-1)
d = decryption key
e = encryption key
d * e = 1 mod(n)
c = m^e mod n
m = c^d mod n
make this ^
and fill in what i know
and guess my way forward
Becuase honestly i have no idea what you are doing
I read it but it's not sticking
This one is slightly different to RSA
Which is a bit pain
of course if it's not too helpful may be worth focusing on the RSA stuff
yeaa, though of course does take some explaining and covering of a bit 
@next basalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @next basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, does anyone have any idea to prove pt(iv) using the previous parts because i am stuck
@wraith violet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wraith violet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me integrate this
use the substitution u = 4 - x
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is this property?
@blazing dust Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @blazing dust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Okay I'm cooked
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug)]
pub struct Vec2 {
pub x: i64,
pub y: i64,
}
impl Vec2 {
pub fn cross(&self, other: &Self, point: &Self) -> i64 {
let ab = self - other;
let pa = point - self;
ab.x * pa.y - ab.y * pa.x
}
}
So i have this cross function that is supposed to determine which side of an edge a point resides on.
The edge is from self to other which are points in space.
I would had thought it would be the cross product between the edge from self to other and the edge from the (origin) to the point
other - self and point - self but that does not seem to work at all.
I thought it was other - self because the edges(vectors) have to be (moved) to start at the origin.
But that doesn't seem to be the case 
picture
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
question: find the sum of all possible 4 digit numbers that can be made using the digits 2,3,4 and 5 exactly once. I found a way to approach this problem but i think there's a flaw in it. Break the 4 digit number in the following manner: 10³×a +10²×b +10¹×c +d. 'a' can take any of the four values (2,3,4,5) and that would repeat 3! times. Similarly, for b, c and d. So the answer would be 10³×(3! ×14)+ 10²×(3! ×14)+ 10¹×(3! ×14)+ 10⁰×(3! ×14). But i suppose the cases would be repeated. For example, consider the number 2345. It would appear once when a=2, once when b=3, once when c=4 and once when d=5, which means it has been repeated 4 times.
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to solve this one?
there's so many wrong things with this
what's m? is this supposed to be n?
I don't know either
did they mean to take the square root there?
oof
Yes
huh
i don't see the pattern then
is the last term supposed to be $\sqrt[n]{x_n}$?
artemetra
sorry but i really don't know how to tackle this. hopefully someone else will be able to help you
<@&286206848099549185>
@blazing dust Has your question been resolved?
its written incorrectly
ig yeah
Closed by @blazing dust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
solve for theta
can someone help me solve this pls
<@&286206848099549185>
say $$8a\sin\theta-\frac{9b\cos\theta}{2}-\frac{7}{16}\sin2\theta=0$$
magnusOP
do you know double angle identity for sin
sin2theta = 2sinthetacostheta?
good write that and you can simplify something
show me your work
i havent been able to simplify it past writing sin2theta as 2sinthetacostheta
but i dont know inverse trignometry
this is was actually a part of a bigger question, i had to find maxima of
so i assumed phi to be a constant and differentiated
which led to that eqn
but how
but we have cos also r8
u want me to write that in terms of sin and then solve?
are you sure phi is a constant here ?
how else wud u find maxima for that eqn
Chain rule, maybe. I can't help anymore now, GTG
Sorry
*right now
Sorry again
@hybrid nexus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there a curvilinear asymptote when the numerator is greater than the denominator by 2 degrees ?
is it polynomial function?
yeah
something like x³/x
yes
the rest is not important so much
so it is 2. degree
so is that when theres a curvilinear function?
and if higher by 1 degree its a slant or oblique asymptote?
Dude I don't know a quadratic asymptote
Maybe there may be point undefined
So it may be undefined at some point, but I don't think it's an asymptote
nvm i got the answer
this is a curvilinear asymptote
thanks i appreciate the effor though
.close
Closed by @lapis ingot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@tough blaze Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If we assume
a equation such as
4√2=4
here let √2=x
so
4x=4
x=4/4
x=1
this is not true why?
the original equation is not true
can you correct it?
no
it is simply not true
unless there is more context, there's nothing else to say about it really
so we just cat assume root as variable?
it's not a variable, it's a number
cant*
oh
thank you
what is your original question? what is the context?
Closed by @restive geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
in the middle of trying to apply feynman
and idk what to plug in for t
to solve for C
this is the original
i could prob do normal trig sub, but i want to do feynman
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
$\text{Note that for }b>0\\\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\ln\text{}x\text{ }dx}{x^{2}+b^{2}}\overset{\ast }{=}\\x=\frac{1}{t}\Leftrightarrow dx=-\frac{1}{t^{2}}dt\\\overset{\ast }{=}-\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\ln\text{}t\text{ }dt}{1+b^{2}t^{2}}$
Joanna Angel
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
i still dont see how this helps solve the integral using feynman
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
I give you a deeper hint:
$\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\ln\text{}x\text{ }dx}{x^{2}+b^{2}}\overset{\ast }{=}\\x=\frac{1}{t}\Leftrightarrow dx=-\frac{1}{t^{2}}dt\\\overset{\ast }{=}-\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\ln\text{}t\text{ }dt}{1+b^{2}\cdot\text{}t^{2}}\overset{\ast}{=}\\t=\frac{u}{b}\Leftrightarrow\text{}dt=\frac{du}{b}\\\overset{\ast}{=}-\frac{1}{b}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\ln\text{}u-\ln\text{}b}{1+u^{2}}du$
Joanna Angel
@torn jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @raven ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
thats (1^(1/n)+2^(1/n)+...+n^(1/n))/n, yes?
Yes
my hint is, what is the limit of 1/n as n approaches infinity?
0
what is 1^0, 2^0, n^0?
np
Closed by @blazing dust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok so for this one just to dobule check all we do is 84,000 * 0.75^3 ?
or do we subract that answer from the original 84,000
is the square around the brackets or the x is included?
$x \cdot (x-1)^2$
A Spoon
@worldly heron
@worldly heron Has your question been resolved?
,rccw
Oof
Closed by @worldly heron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me about the graph polynomial function? , I actually have an incomplete notes in my nb and it says :
**Degree of polynomial function :
- if the degree of the polynomial function is even, then the left........**
does someone know what's next? please elaborate thanks so much !
are you familiar with end behavior?
I think it's end behavior
noo, I was in another activity while my class having math T^T
okay but i hope you recognise the amount of variation "left something" can be describing
was this given to you in english?
opposite of right
yea
i think so too
you just said you werent familiar with end behaviour so how can you say that? But anyways, i wont play detective. If you want to go with the end behaviour we can go with the end behaviour
are you familiar with the graphs of functions like x^2, x^4, ...?
I did a search
not yet, i think we haven't discussed that
so you dont know what $\m fx = x^2$ is?
for example
ok so do u know how it looks like in a graph?
nope
what grade is this for btw? Its suspicious you would be considering end behaviour without knowing the graph of the function even
10TH
graphing of polynomial functions just got introduced to us
,w plot x^2 from -20 to 20
so like my teacher isnt really teaching us how to really graph
this is what f(x) = x^2 looks like
"looks like"?
it looks a parabola or a U
ohh so that's a quadratic function?
yeah it is
in which way?
? what are you talking about
will they look the same when graphing? T^T
this is graphing
I MEAN
maybe she doesn't even know what is a function's graph
does it apply to other quadratic functions??
?? she is studying end-behaviour. She needs to know what the graph is like
im so sorry im so dumb rn
you have to say to her that it is the set of point such that (x,f(x))
No. Not all of them
but its quadratic tho why?
wdym?
can you send me an image of your question without you typing it? Preferbly like the full paper if this is a homework
i really need to gauge what this is about
the questions imasking is on my mind........i really dont have like a literal paper to problem to solve
i just wnna understand
so like for example
f(x) = 3x^2 , it is quadratic right? so if you're gonna graph it will it look like the graph of f(x)=x^2 ?
how?
take a few points for example
oh so the graph will loook the same but abit larger?
for f(x) = x^2, you have f(0) = 0, f(1) = 1, f(2) = 4
but for f(x) = 3x^2 you have f(0) = 0, f(1) = 3, f(2) = 12
do you see how the second one is "getting there" faster than the first?
no the opposite
it will look thinner
this is a desmos illustration
well again think of what the other person said earlier
a graph is just a collection of points (x, f(x)) right?
do u agree with that
oh so the bigger thing the thinner in the graph??






