#help-26
1 messages · Page 179 of 1
Professor Sucks cancelled class on Monday and threw us 2 new Chapters to cover on our own
This video tutorial explains how to perform long division of polynomials with remainder and with missing terms.
Introduction to Polynomials: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rxx4HepHI_E
Polynomials - Basic Operations:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvL9aDGNHqA
Dividing Polynomials By Mo...
Mind you it takes 2 days for us to cover one
just go down the rabbit hole of these videos
Wdym
Bet that up lil bro
@arctic sundial Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @arctic sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
Close
what is your question
I wanted help in understanding this logic problem
...
.close
Closed by @sweet shard
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got a as 4
from this, is there an easy way to find part b?
?
hello??
<@&286206848099549185>
so <@&268886789983436800> , trolled again
lol
.close
Closed by @deft holly
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is arctan(1)
pi/4
no
😭
cos = 1 and sin = 1
That's not the definition of arctan
oh
nope
that's the definition of cot(x)
lmao
tan(x) = sin(x)/cos(x)
cot(x) = cos(x)/sin(x)
oh
wait
then whats arctan
inverse tan
what does that mean
1/tan(x)
probably they thought $\tan = \frac1{tan^{-1}}$
if $\tan x= a$, then $\arctan a = x$
oh
no that is not true
oh right-
in more technical terms, arctan is the inverse function of tan, just like you said
arctan(1) = tan(u) where u = something that would make tan(u) = 1????
arctan(1) = u is what you probably meant
and how would you know that the answer is pi/4
ok thanks also how do i make my calculator not give the answers in degrees
and radians(i think) instead
What's your calculator's type/model?
ti30x
Closed by @sonic belfry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me find pb
helloooooo\
tbh im not really sure how to start this problem
the question is like this
let P be a point inside rectangle abcd. if pd = 12, pc = 7, pa = 10, find pb
i think u should use trignometry
https://brilliant.org/wiki/british-flag-theorem/ @sinful harness
I think this it it
use the British flag theorem, which states that for any point inside a rectangle, the sum of the squares of the distances from that point to two opposite corners is equal to the sum of the squares of the distances to the other two opposite corners. the formula is like this PA^2 +PC^2 = pb^2 +Pd^2
i was typin that
ohhhh wait ill try to understand let me see ill studyyy it thank youuuuu so much
.close
Closed by @sinful harness
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me solve this question ?
hold up gimme one minute
ok thanks
no
is it 90?
by using the fact that the opposite andles of cyclic quadrilaterals are supplementary
I get what you mean, but since PR isn't the radius it isn't 90
oww ok
hmm wait you're Malaysian aren't you
ya
so you got the answer?
98?
hmm yeah seems like the 74 degrees is QPS
np
.close
Closed by @hushed cliff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Another weird one
There is a c part but that part is just pure word choice

oh way lemme fix b part
What have you done till now?
part a?
is this done
nah not yet
i'm trying to prove f(x)>2024|f'(x)| wrong
if that is wrong
then part a is done

@dire mural Has your question been resolved?
@dire mural Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @dire mural
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone explain
caught the translation uptil here
do you know what natural numbers are?
Yep!
nice
Positive integers
they are represented by the Alphabet N
similarly we are now introducing a new set of numbers called rational numbers
they are denoted by Q
they are defining(saying saying that)Q as any number which can be written of the form p / q
$p/q$
Cnidarian
where p can be any integer
and q is any integer except 0
this is what they meant over here
q not equals 0
they are also saying that all rational numbers can be added,subtracted,multiplied and divided
I See! Thank you a lot!
@jolly urchin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain to me why at step 3 we dont just get rid of the +9/16 and -9/16?
so that it would become 2(y^2-3/2y)
to make it a perfect square
i still dont understand, normally with a completing a square we add the number outside the brackets?
c=0
ohh its just invisible so to say
yeah
is it possible to use completing the square to simplify an expression?
such that we try find out what x is equal to?
i figured id use that sheet and try again from the start of one of my lines.
4x^2-x+0
4(x^2-1/4x+0/4
but its known that 0 cannot be divided with, right?
so instead would we try
4(x^2-1/4x)
0/4 = 0
4/0 = undefined
oh...
yeah so here 0/4 would become 0
so it would then turn into 4(x-1/8x+0)
here u wrote 1/4
ill get it up
4x^2 - x?
5X 2 −3X+4Y 2+2XY−6Y+7X 2
To simplify
12x^2-3x +4y^2 -6y +2xy
3(4x^2-x) +2(2y^2-3y) +2xy
To solve first part of x we should take
4x^2-x+0
4(x^2-1/4x+0)
4(x^2-1/8x+0)
4(x-1/8x+0 -1/64)
I added 0 in as the placeholder for c in the previous picture
but this is in the question and it is asking us to simplify completely
is it 7x^2?
yes
@rocky sky Has your question been resolved?
4(x^2-x+0)
when attempting to complete the square
turns into something like 4(x-1/8x+0-1/64)?
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @rocky sky
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hp

are you sure about the sin3x
use angle sum then
sin(2x+x)
expand
sin2xcosx + cos2xsinx
then expand the double angle
heklp
@willow nest Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what did i do wrong here?
<@&286206848099549185>
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
,w sin 30
yeah i mean i'm failing to see the error here
both questions are different right
it is quite right
the first pic is the problem, the second pic is my work
the online software's marking wrong idk why
Your solution seems right
@wintry crater Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Bro your answer is correct

I even read vectors again to rechecked it
would you say there's something wrong with the software?
let me check
it is correct
the engine is shitty
<@&286206848099549185>
Shit your system is shit
pls help me why the computer favors 2√27 over 6√3
If you take the root of 27 if will be 3√3 and multiply it with 2
oh so they're equivalent?
Nothing will happen your answer is correct
Yrs
No problem
.close
Closed by @wintry crater
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone pls help me with this question
I'm struggling
<@&286206848099549185> 
which one
can you type it pls cause im blind without my glasses
nvm
which question
for b
it is a geometric series with a constant ratio of 1.02 (from the 2% interest). You can apply the geometric series formula to prove the total value of Phil’s savings after 20 years.
for c use the equation from part b and solve for P by equating the total value of his savings to the amount he owes after 20 years.
d.i use present value formula for an annuity
d.ii use perpetuity formula
these are hints btw not answers
thank you!! i prefer hints so that's really helpful
what is the perpetuity formula?
Present Value (PV) = Cash Flow (CF)/Interest Rate (IR).
oh, I haven't learnt about cash flow
but this question was in my test 
ig its extra knowledge
is that the only way to solve d?
Wdym
you mentioned that i should use the perpetuity formula to solve dii
and the present value formula for di
probably not but its the simplest way to do so
@quasi prairie Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I go on about turning this into standard form? (Nvm, I think I got it)
.close
Closed by @honest musk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(lemme see if I just forgot the bases
the x^2 should be in the same log as the y and z terms
log(A) + log(B) = log(AB)
and yes, it should be log_7
like this?
oh, you also need to distribute the 2
Wdym
that 2 in front is multiplied onto everything. not just the first log
ohhhh
so would it just be x? and 2 next to the log
no, you need to distribute it, and then use the power rules, and sum/difference rules
or use the power rule at the end.
ohh
There we go it worked, Thanks!
.close
Closed by @high quail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you find an equation for 3.) a.) ?
Is it not 2x(16-x^2)?
What is this question talking about
Wait why 2x
Why not just x
Explain your Reasoning
Oh I See
The area of a rectangle is base times height
It seems to me that you wrote 2 times base times height
Remember
Rectangle is base times height
And triangle is half base times height
Very Imporant Theorem
@neon iron do you understand?
It’s a little complicated
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So I have to find the derivative using the chain rule
So from my understanding for exponents
Its supposed to be (e^tsin2t) * g'(x)
So when I did the work, I got (e^tsin2t) * (tcos2t)
But the textbook answer shows this:
I'm just curious as to what I did wrong here
Since the derivative of sin should just be cos
Pls help
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Lemme check the textbook
I didn't see a product rule being mentioned
Yeah theres no mention of a product rule
And the prof didn't mention it

Yeah I went back to doublecheck to make sure.
Maybe I missed it because I was braindead from all the exams. 
I'll ask them tomorrow and come back later.
Thank you.
.close
Closed by @vernal dawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@proven narwhal Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
Yeah
.close
Closed by @proven narwhal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Heeeelp with this again
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Hint 1: area of APD + area of PBC = half the area of the paralleogram ABCD
can i prove it?
sure
draw a line BD, compaer
area of APD + area of PBC
and
area of ABD
e.g. they are of same height with base on AB
ooh i see
Hint 2: area of QBC is half of the area of parallelogram ABCD
oooh so APD +PBC=QBC? and QBC=QPB +PCB?
it would be all But how i can prove this ?
same base length, same height
just that one is parallelogram, one is triangle
oh nicee i get this
Closed by @tranquil birch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m supposed to find the slope of the graph at (3,1). In another problem I did previously, I differentiated every term with respect to x, and then I isolated dy/dx terms to solve. However, I’m very stuck on the calculus portion and I’m confused on how to further differentiate this equation.
,rotate
Everything you have done is fine so far
Implicit differentiation?
Yes
Which term do you have trouble differentiating?
Yup
Yea
Would I represent (x^2 +y^2) as one variable or would it be as a function of x
Function of x
The latter i think
So it would be u(x)= x^2 + y^2
It's similar to (sin x) ^2
Uh yes
Yup
Doesn't matter
I just keep on doing it?
I’m confused
Every time I use the chain rule on that term it’s just giving me the same term
I keep getting d/dx[(x^2 + y^2)^2] and d/dx[x^2+y^2]
Would it be correct if I wrote that d/dx[(x^2+y^2)^2] is equal to 2(x^2+y^2) because of the power rule
This is correct
Sorry this was wrong didn't notice it wouldn't be whole square and it wouldnt be the derivative
2(X^2 + Y^2) * d/dx(x^2 + y^2)
Can you send where you are stuck
You'll have to multiply but before that take 2 common and cancel with 100
I can take 2 out of dy/dx[2y] ?
Yup
By 4
So leave the coefficient of 3 alone then?
Yup
Ok
I will distribute and try to isolate now
Nevermind I will not the polynomials are too big
Or
I am confused how to get dy/dx out since there are added terms in the parentheses
You could put x = 1 and y = 3
It wouldn't be that hard to distribute
,rotate
You'll be able to take dy/dx common between two terms
,rotate
This looks really weird I don’t know if I did it right
Correct, my bad
I think I did something wrong in the last few lines
I used a calculator to get this answer
,wolf f(x,y) = -(3xy^2 - 25y + 3x^3)/(3y^3 + 3x^2y - 25x) for (x,y)=(3,1)
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ionic zenith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do they take it as an arithmetic sequence without any mention of it being one?
Can you see the pattern?
123 then 130 then 137...
@quasi prairie Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @quasi prairie
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does this come from? It looks like dot product but how can we turn g(x,y) into a dot product form like this?
in this situation $\langle a, b \rangle$ just denotes a vector with components $a$ and $b$, similar to $(a,b)$ or $\begin{pmatrix} a \ b \end{pmatrix}$
cloud
then how did they decompose g into a vector like that?
Closed by @strong sable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yup yw
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@strong sable Has your question been resolved?
@strong sable Has your question been resolved?
@strong sable Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i don't know, that's why i asked.
can you type it? Does it say 5*pi/9 + 5*pi/18 (in radians?) + mcc(?) = pi?
i think it's m (for measure) of angle c
measurement of angle C
Ahh, alr
and the is s = 5
then it is just simple subtraction, after you move all the known angles on one side
Closed by @placid crag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello guys, have a question about solution of this problem, recently found some explanation from one of the helpers towards my classmate, but I couldn't get to solution after reading and understanding of this explanation (will send it after this massage)
@fiery bluff Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
hi
Hi
okay
I can't see a thing, zoom it in or type the question please
assignnment
Ok, give a sec, will send it as a text
We have a rectangle with dimensions of m x n meters, on the surface of which there is a satellite at the initial position with coordinates (x, y) (where the initial position is not on any of the sides of the rectangle). It can move around the inside of the rectangle and bounce off its walls (see picture). Assume that the satellite has negligible dimensions and consider the angle a V in the range 0 < a < 360°
- We have specified the maximum distance D that the satellite can cover. As a function of D, determine how many different pairs (d,a) exist, where d < D denotes the distance traveled by the satellite at the angle at which it begins to move, such that the satellite stops at exactly one of the corners of the rectangle?
- We have specified the maximum number of reflections of the satellite N. Let us calculate that the reflection by the corner of the rectangle is counted as two reflections. How many different pairs (n,a) exist, where n < N denotes the number of reflections of the satellite on the edge of the rectangle and and the angle at which it starts to move, such that the satellite stops exactly at the corner of the rectangle after exactly n reflections?
As can be seen in the image below. if we have a 3 x 3 kilometer square, starting position as in the picture and allowing at most one bounce, there are 12 different solutions. The answer in this case is V, so 12.
This task is purely theoretical, in addition to the correctness of the solution, pay attention to the procedure and justification, why your procedure is correct - why the model can be described in a certain way, why some property or algebraic modification applies, etc. Without a proper explanation of the important non-trivial steps, you will not be awarded full points.
Since this assignment in not basically written in English but was translated by me from Czech, just in case something not gonna make sense feel free to ask I will translate it separately
And yeah r u still here ?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
Please don't ping helpers multiple time, It's a good idea to ask in one of the advanced channels too I think
Okey sorry, just followed instructions that was given to me by bot, can u recommend some please?
I think #geometry-and-trigonometry might be fitting here
Thanks, will ask there, appreciate it
@fiery bluff Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
there is no progress WHATSOEVER
Draw diagram and send
okay
this should be visible
any direct aproach is not helping
Angle bisector theorem
what is its statement?
you can search on YouTube if you dont know how to use it
its best to learn early
,w angle bisector theorem
yes
we have to find angle>
jee thanks didn't realise
Linear equations?
Here are those:
sin(2A+B)/(sin(B)) = 2cosA
3A + 2B = pi
yes
You can't use trig lol
well these questions won't be asked in my exam
Send you calculations
the third case only gives positive values of A and B both
which is 0.2 pi and 0.2 pi, this implies A = B
now I think I am done
Okk
which gives our answer as 72 deg / 9 = 8
how fun
i didn't know geometry can be this non-ambiguous
That angle bisector theorem helped me
thanks
.close
Closed by @rough narwhal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
She used some AI lol
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wolfram alpha
Closed by @rough narwhal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help solving week 5 and 6 of this time series table using 0.2 to find smoothing values
show the rest of the problem. nobody but you knows what alpha is supposed to be
The whole problem
show the formula with exp. smoothing parameter you were taught
The formula is up top
can you just type it here
how did you get 15.38
seems like you already know how to calculate it since you got the first few weeks right
Yea but what I think is the right answer isn’t right
15.38 is just a guess, I’m just trying to put different numbers in there at this point. I’m on submission 5/10 and it’s still not working
I did it by myself but I messed up the table trying to figure out how to do week 5 and 6
Chatgpt getting it wrong too
Formula I used is up top
PotatoCaleb
Brb
@livid fox Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a question again about fourier series. It's about calculating the sum of an even function
And I have a given fourier series
The function is even
This is the given fourier series
Now the question is to calculate the sum of this fourier series for t=0 and t=2
My first question, how do I confirm if the function is discontinous at t=0 or t=2?
why do you think f(t) is disctoninuous at t=0?
I mean it seems like it's not connected with the other part
0 at t=0
and -t + 2 between 0 and 2
oh right
indeed it is
So for t=2
for t=0
It's continous?
t=2 looks continuous
okay, now the question is
How do I calculate the sum of the fourier series
for t=0
and t=2
do I just do it manually, plug in t=0 in the fourier formula and t=2?
and add them together?
why are you adding f(0) + f(2)
I'm realizing that the question is not asking for that
So I need to calculate each seperately
,w sum k=1 to inf (1-cos(2k))/k^2
pain
i doubt you're supposed to actually find the exact fourier series value at t=0 and 2
,w sum k=1 to inf (1-cos(2k)) * cos(2k) /k^2
maybe t=2
What do you suggest I do?
show the original question
It's in a different language
hence why I translate it
But it says
''Determine the sum of the series for t=0, and t=2''
you just use this
What do I do with it?
wait a sec, the second line says -t+2 if 0<=t as well
isn't there a theorem that the series converges to the average of the discontinuities
That's what I was about to ask
so thinking it'd be 1
If there is something we need to consider due to it being discontinous?
how do you find the average value of an ill-defined function
or does it not matter that f(0) is both 0 and 2
I've seen part of a classmates solution, apparently he said something about due to it being discontinous we need to take the limit from both the positive and negative direction of 0
and add them together over 2
yea do that
But I don't understand really why? if so is there a theorem for it?
In mathematics, the Dirichlet–Jordan test gives sufficient conditions for a real-valued, periodic function f to be equal to the sum of its Fourier series at a point of continuity. Moreover, the behavior of the Fourier series at points of discontinuity is determined as well (it is the midpoint of the values of the discontinuity). It is one of man...
so yeah, they definitely messed up in defining f there
but the series is good enough to define if we just assume what they probably meant to put like < there instead
The reason I'm confused is which part I'm supposed to consider? it's a split function
So at f(0)
is it 0 or is it 2?
since it says at t = 0 then it is 0
but between 0 and 2, it is 2
the fourier series itself doesn't care
What do you mean?
it just converges to the average of the left and right hand limits to that discontinuity
there are really two fs here
one is the piecewise thing they defined (incorrectly at t=0) and then the other is the series
these aren't the same thing really
kind of like how 1/(1-x) and 1+x+x^2+... are not the same, they don't converge at the same points
the piecewise function probably should have been defined to have 0<t<=2
I assume they then assume that f(0) = 2
wait do you mean (0+2)/2 ?
since the left side is 0 and the right side is 2
that left hand limit is wrong, you agree with that?
hmm it's approaching from negative
so it should be 0?
but if it is approaching from positive it should be 2
okay I think it's beginning to make sense to why they defined it wrong, should've been 0<t<=2
I should email the teacher and ask about it
But I mean, since it is defined as 0<=t<=2
yeah yeah exactly
Isn't it 2+2?
I would assume that it should be 0, if we used the definition you said
if you draw a graph it should be more apparent
Stealing my classmate's graph
well it's periodic so that section 2<=t<=pi is where it's 0 should be on the left
no that's a different graph
hmm, let me graph it on desmos real fast
hmm okay
So you're stating that approaching from negative direction
it should be 0
looking at the graph, the evidence is strong that it is true yea
yeah
hmm
I'll email the teacher
Thanks for the help
But would it be the same even if it's continious on t=2?
i don't get it, why are you asking if you know the whole solution
I am avoiding to look at the solution
And I don't know
maybe I am missing something
if it is right even
you're looking at it anyway
it's just a classmate's solution
oh i see
I missed the part where you said it's an even function
yea i thought you meant your teacher's solutions
Does that change it?
yeah I was assuming the function had a period of pi
and we were repeating this section every pi
is this your work or your classmates'?
but if it's even and they're saying it reflects across the y axis and this is the 2pi piece that's repeated, then this is correct
This was in the assignment
i assumed it was right since you didn't ask about it
there are no discontinuities at all
it'd be better next time to just show the entire given assignment
related to the problem
I can, but it is in swedish
doesn't matter
is this 100% clear why this is now
But how is it not discontinous?
so you just typed the assignment wrong?
well once you know it's that reflected piece then it's just a bunch of triangles
this is doubly true now
I just flopped hard💀
just graphing the first 10 terms of the fourier series you gave lines up, now that we know it's supposed to be even of period 2pi, then this picture I drew is wrong cause it missed that extra info
Makes sense yes
But is there still not some discontinouty? even if it's 2pi period?
should still be some hard cut in the middle
where
Wait
the derivative is not continuous (or defined at every mulitple of 2pi)
but the function itself is continuous
So that's its shape?
so why do we use that theorom? of (2+2)/2, I thought that is only used when we find the function to be discontinous or maybe I misunderstood why we use that theorom?
well it's true when it's continuous as well
it's really more of an added benefit that it gets you the value when it's discontinuous too
no but it must be discontinous at t=0
because it jumps straight from 0 to 2 there and then it's -t + 2
lol looking at it now I don' tknow what I was saying, I got mixed up at some point
trying to multitask my bad
okay so let's repeat the same question, after I cleared up that I had copied my teacher's assignment wrong
if we approach the limit from negative direction of 0
do we get 0 or 2?😭
you have to use this to find f(0)
Yea that's when we do this
That my classmate did
But is it really 2? for t-0 from negative direction
Shouldn't it be 0?
and from the positive direction it approaches 2
@mortal patrol Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mortal patrol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Linear algebra question
Hey so I have really problems understanding the change the basis/coordinates in linear algebra. So I have this slide. Can someone help me with understanding this with maybe some example?
@patent quest Has your question been resolved?
@patent quest Has your question been resolved?
@patent quest Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For question 3, why would there be no zeroes?
There should be one zero for 3. If I'm understanding the graph correctly
would it be (5,0)?
Yea but I think there are 2 zeroes
one on the right of the asymptote and one on the left of the asymptote
Oh I am dumb I missed the left of the graph entirely
@neat mist Has your question been resolved?
in my teachers answer key she puts "no zeroes"
idk how she got to that
👍
wait so how would i algebraically find the zero on the left?
you dont have equations, so you can do it algebraically
Idk the rules entirely about that but it might not have zeroes if it's not a function
technically speaking
oh wait
your best bet would be to look that its somewhere between -2 and -4 and guess something like -2.5
maybe she put no zeroes because the graph isnt a function?
I think so
surely a sensible definition of "zero" for relations would just be places where the relation intersects the y-axis
doesn't need to be changed from the way its defined for functions
If the relation is not a function then the concepts of functions don't apply. The graph in diagram 3 does not form a valid function
so because it isnt a function, there would not be any zeroes?
I think your teacher is doing something very nonstandard here because they're asking for the domain, range and zeros of a relation but those concepts don't typically make much sense for any arbitrary relation
idk
shes a terrible teacher so im not suprised
when i was first taught the concept of a relation they defined said terms
but could be different
not zeroes admittedly
Sorry, the domain and range of a relation are well-defined and standard concepts
but the zero probably is not
i think this is a very silly question if the answer is "there are no zeroes since its not a function" when the definition of a zero extends so obviously to arbitrary relations but i guess so
bro is cooked
I think it's an okay question because it forces the student to think about whether zeros do extend to arbitrary relations or not
and funnily enough I don't see at all why you would define such a concept
or actually
I don't see how you could
because even at best you could only define it for subsets of A x B where B contains some zero element
Would not a zero in a relation be an element (0,x) in the relation?
but there's no guarantee that that would be the case in general
but we're looking specifically at relations on R here
the definition of zero for a function makes just as little sense if you dont take the function to be on R
With functions it's very standard that the codomain is some "numeric" set
With relations, not so much
like {(a,c) (b,d)} qualifies as a function on the alphabet, but certainly there's no sensible notion of a zero
idk, for me there's not a difference enough to think this is some useful distinction
but you're right that the zero of a function doesn't make sense for any general completely arbitrary function
I mean, the zero of a function is a useful concept for obvious reasons
because it allows you to standardize the procedure of solving polynomial equations for example
But there generally just is no need for a super niche concept that would only apply for all relations over R
Because for those relations that are functions, well you have the zero of a function
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
and for those relations that are not functions, whether or not one of the elements is 0 is not usually so interesting that the concept should warrant its own terminology
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.So maybe in some sense -1 is a "zero" of <= because -1<=0 but how is that special at all, I don't know
but its not its own terminology, and despite the fact its not something you'll talk about a lot, there's no reason not to just have the exact same definition extend more generally for zero effort, it certainly holds nonzero utility! but this is more of a philosophical thing now lol
I think it holds negative utility because teaching something that no mathematician would ever need or use is a waste of everyone's time
I guess so
But in the context of the question i still think asking the question is not right, i.e. "there are no zeroes" would be a sensible expected answer to a question where zeroes was a concept that doesn't make sense, rather than one where it just doesnt hold usefulness
A definition (of this kind) is itself not math and thus a definition (of this kind) should only be taught if it helps you to reason about mathematical objects
True
Well it doesn't make sense if no one's defined what it means
in the context of being surrounded by three functions, I don't think its fair to say it doesn't make sense. It doesn't fit exactly to a definition, but that's purely because we are working on a superset of something where it does work. I think to say this is a sensible question is bad pedagogy, if I see "find the x of y", but I only know how to find the "x of z", I'm gonna look back for where we defined the "x of y" in class, and go ask the professor if something specific is the definition failing that, and maybe try to extend the x of z to x of y - the language of the question has some degree of implication that "the zeroes of relation R" is a concept that makes sense imo.
@snow basalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @snow basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you find the least possible multiplicity of a root/zero by just looking at the graph of the polynomial
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Answer the following questions about p(x).
(a) What are the end behaviours of p(x).
(b) How many turning points does p(x) have?
(c) What is the least possible degree of p(x)?
(d) Write down the roots of p(x) and their least possible multiplicities.
(e) Use the roots and the y-intercept of p(x) to write down a possible equation
for p(x).
I'm confused about question d
would it just be multiplicty of 1 for all the roots except 4 which would be 2?
probably
this matches and you can't reduce the multiplicity on any of them
Thank you so much
been stuck on this forever and had no clue what the graph equation even looked like
well you need a factor of (x+5) to have a root at -5 etc
just experimenting until it matches
Closed by @undone sluice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
Closed by @tacit turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

