#help-26
1 messages · Page 166 of 1
yea but that is not the reason, there i was just explaining the graph of g(x)
the reason is because the limits from both sides are different
so there is not definite limit
as x approaches 0
oh i see
yeah right so because from the left itd be 3
and then from the right itd be 1..?
ye
the limit doesnt exist right
yea
and then in the case for (b) i wouldnt be able to solve it considering that
yes
no issue
.close
Closed by @lusty ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
:333
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$f: A\to\mathbb{R}$
Good
Does this mean A is a subset of something, which is called domain, will give $x \in A$, a value in $\mathbb{R}$ with $f(x)$.
Good
Or does this just mean the set A is a subset of R?
And the result is a different thing to be discussed?
Well, “all sets are subsets of themselves”, but A can be any set, at least in general (say e.g. A is a set of students and f measures their height/weight or returns their age or something)
So could I express like this $$f: D_f \to V_f$$ Where $D_f$ means domain, and $V_f$ means range?
Good
I mean, you could 
Is this certain, or under some circumstances?
Alright, I guess this means certain.
Thanks
.close
Closed by @spare monolith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
post your question if you've got one
@hexed ravine Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Devil Wears Prada
did i do something wrong?
show your work
$$ \frac {(a + h)^2 - 2(a + h) + 3 - (a)^2 - 2(a) + 3} h $$
Devil Wears Prada
Devil Wears Prada
wait let me double check
yeah there is something wrong
at least, 6 should be divided by h
and the +3 at the end should be -3
ah nvm
why
why
because you're supposed to subtract f(a)
and f(a) = a^2 - 2a + 3
so if you subtract it, it becomes -a^2 + 2a - 3
Devil Wears Prada
is the solution
Devil Wears Prada
Devil Wears Prada
$$from (a + h)^2$$
Devil Wears Prada
but you don't seem to have divided 2ah by h
dont need to if it got canceled out
refer to this
where did the 2ah come from
Devil Wears Prada
its just 2ah on the top
but you're dividing everything by h
when distributing (a + h)^2
including 2ah
ok so then
so how can you have 2ah at the end
wtf
show me your work, this makes zero sense
you can't just cancel the denominator with one term of the numerator
$$ \frac {(a + h)^2 - 2(a + h) + 3 - (a)^2 + 2(a) - 3} h $$
$$ \frac {a^2 + 2ah + h^2 - 2a - 2h + 3 - a^2 + 2a - 3} h $$
how is first wrong?
you have -2a + 3 at the end, instead of +2a - 3
Devil Wears Prada
$$ \frac {(a + h)^2 - 2(a + h) + 3 - (a)^2 + 2(a) - 3} h $$
$$ \frac {a^2 + 2ah + h^2 - 2a - 2h + 3 - a^2 + 2a - 3} h $$
$$ \frac {2ah + h^2 - 2h} h $$
Devil Wears Prada
$$ 2a - h $$
Devil Wears Prada
there should be 3 terms
why
$$\frac{2ah + h^2 - 2h}{h} = \frac{2ah}{h} + \frac{h^2}{h} - \frac{2h}{h}$$
Bungo
$$ \frac {h^2} h = h $$
Devil Wears Prada
Devil Wears Prada
oh thanks a lot
sure, cheers!
.close
Closed by @eternal nymph
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
someone can help me i didnt know how to do this and by the way sorry my english is bad
@solemn tinsel Has your question been resolved?
Use Integration by Parts (IBP).
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What's the difference between f(x) and y?
f(x) is just function notation
in your context they’re the same because the output of f will be a value of y
on the cartesian plane
@left canyon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
.reopen
✅
you can only reopen channels that were yours
I was just trying to reopen this channel
to start a new channel just post a question
because the channel wasn’t available
I wasn't looking when I went to this channel mb
just go to any of the unused channels
alr
Closed by @agile harness
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help Me for #9
im just not sure on what to do from here?
what's it asking?
what have you tried so far
ive tried A = 2x * 2y
which is 4xy
then i find y and plug it in
@rose sierra so this was the work i have or atleast what my teacher wrote
but im confused on how he got = - A(X)
ok you don't want y
how can you express y in terms of x
yes so 4xy
then i put 4x and y (i isolated y) so 4x sqrt 4-x^2
and im just not sure which one to choose
@wise tundra Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
So we know that PQ+QR should be equal to PR right?
Yes
Try it then
Closed by @still bough
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Yep
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is more physics related but i really don't get b-d
b I used the formula but it is still wrong
what formula did you use?
@lapis swallow Has your question been resolved?
@lapis swallow Has your question been resolved?
(b) asks for 4.9 seconds after the maximum. So it wants you to find the time of the vertex, add 4.9 seconds to it, and then find the height.
for c, do you know something called a derivative?
for d, you should find when y(t) equals 0
Yes lol
How do I set up the equation to find derivative here
plug in the initial values and then take the derivative
as well as -9.8 for gravity
What is the equation for that? I searched up the problem and found the equation, but when I plugged it in, the answer was still wrong
@lapis swallow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lapis swallow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Ok ty
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please check if my answers are correct. Calculus 1
Both are correct i think
Just a note on notation
You wrote $\lim_{v\to c^{-1}}$
Edward II
Instead of $\lim_{v\to c^{-}}$
Edward II
These are different things: the first would mean the (two sided) limit as v approaches 1/c, whereas the second what is desired here meaning the limit to c from below
Emily
Oh yeah thank you so much
Why are you not sure?
Not sure whether "physically meaningful" would be the correct justification for not having the square root of a negative
Since L isn't even defined for v > c
So what should I say instead?
@ripe stag Has your question been resolved?
ig you should simply say a lefthand limit is necessary because the Lorentz contraction formula is undefined for velocities beyond the speed of light
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi everyone, I could use some advice. I'm currently taking Calculus 1 for Computer Science and I have only followed algebra 1, geometry and algebra 2 on Khan Academy.
Last week, we had a warm-up week covering these concepts:
1. Numbers and basic arithmetic operations
2. Powers
3. Fractions
4. Roots
5. Curves, functions and graphs
6. The function exp, ln and log
7. The functions sin, cos and tan
8. Equations, ineuqalities and system of equations
9. Differentiation
10. Antidifferentiation
11. Integration
12. Vectors
I feel pretty confident with topics 1–6 and 8, but I'm struggling with topics 7, 9, 10, and 11. We just started limits in class, and I didn’t understand much of it.
Could anyone suggest how I can catch up? Should I watch Professor Leonard's playlist, and if so, how far should I go?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYyARMqiaag&list=PLF797E961509B4EB5&index=2
https://www.patreon.com/ProfessorLeonard
Calculus 1 Lecture 0.1: Lines, Angle of Inclination, and the Distance Formula
These are my course objectives:
Hmm is your class coming to an end soon?
No it just started
Then isn't it normal to struggle on topics 9-12
because you're going to learn all of it in your current class
Oh really, I had these topics in the warmup week
and I thought it was a must understand topic before going into calculus
I mean i'm guessing "course objectives" means what you'll be expected to know by the end of the course
yes
oh
for 7) you can pick you trig yeah
its quite helpful for a computation based calculus class
helpful and important*
Did you watch any professor leonard lectures?
no...
u can just focus on doing some practice problems
after u learn from professor leonard or whatever
Do you need to know differentiation and integration for limits?
no
you have it backwards
Oh so I had differentiation and integration in my warmup week, but the first calculus lesson is about limits
I guess that's just a diagnostic test or something?
Or you're not telling us something
Oh cool so I can just start with a video like this:
No it was like a warmup week for students who never had math before in high school
But how is it a warmup week when they had you do everything you're expected to learn at the end of the course lol
sounds good yeah
I can show you some of the questions
yeah u could show them i guess
okay so did you learn differentiation in class?
not yet
only in the warmup week, but it was really difficult
lol idk what's going in your class
but yes you can do these questions after yk what differentiation is
alright so I can start with limits without knowing (anti)differentiation, integration right
limits -> differentiation -> antidifferentiation
u need to know things like: quotient rule, product rule, chain rule, etc. to do these questions
I know these concepts average (red box), should I revise more topics before going into limits?
ooh alright
yes you should do trig first
then you can do limits afterwards
so chapter 7?
yes
yes
yes I received limits homework for friday
but I need to catch up first
oh then you're good i guess
never had any math in high school related to calclus
i thought u received smth like that for hw
ooh
Thanks for the advice @urban barn @smoky sparrow
any more advice
good source of information
ummm not for now
Don't just watch professor leonard and expect to know everything
make sure to do practice problems

Closed by @patent quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello this is regarding x and y intercepts (rational function)
how do you find x^2 + 2 x + 1 / x
What is meant by you when you say, "Find [expression]"?
in finding the x - int
because you usually equate it to 0 right
x^2 + 2x + 1/x = y?
!nosols lmao
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
So it is about finding the roots of f(x).
yeah
x = 0
No.
wqaity sorry
Wait
Also note that the numerator is just (x+1)^2 so even easier.
x = 0 is indeterminate if I am not wrong
Idk
Just multiply by x both sides.
LHS and RHS.
if x = 0 what will then x become
-1?
yeah...
or i replied at the wrong mesg
patience broski patience
nono it's fine
😉
Closed by @obsidian dew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
welcome
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So, for reference, I know my answers are correct, but I'm trying to understand how I do something like properly test the asymptote section
I know as x approaches the VA, h(x) is approaching infinity
and I did a little sketch
but why do I know that? I'm sorry if that question seems dumb or obvious
but I don't know how I can put into words or properly prove this is correct..
I hope that explains my question.. because with other, simpler problems
I can just throw in a hypothetical test value and then plot it and go 'oh well look see that shows why it's like this'
or I guess I know that we cant have anything Less than 4/3 for an x value
I think I'll just use wolfram alpha or some program to graph a few of these functions, because it's really hard to picture in my head, or find words to explain how I know this
So just in general with a negative log function..
from the right side, h(x) approaches - infinity
and from the left it starts at infinity, right?
or well, the closer and closer it gets to the vertical asymptote, the closer it gets to infinity
infinitesimally close, right?
since it can't actually reach infinity..
@orchid agate Has your question been resolved?
@orchid agate Has your question been resolved?
yes
you could say in the limit as x -> 0, y -> infinity
right
it "cant" reach infinity in the sense that infinity is not a number part of the Reals
its """like""" saying that sqrt(-1) isnt i in the Reals since, well i is a complex number not part of R
sometimes when talking with limits you define a set $\bar{\mathbb{R}} = \mathbb{R}∪{\pm \infty}$ which is the closure of R, sometimes called the extended reals,
I think yoou're speaking a bit beyond my understanding, I'm sorry.. or I sorta understand, maybe?
woomy
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
basically sometimes you are trying to solve a limit and the answer is infinity
like in this case
the closer we get to the left, the bigger the number gets
but saying that its equal to infinity doesnt really mean anything since infinity is not a number
like if we couldn't graph it
is there any way to prove iit?
or some way to reason out that's how it is?
so we define a set R{infinity} thats basically R and the 2 infinities (plus/minus)
Intuitively you can draw a vertical line at x = 0
and say the 2 never intersect
Sure
to prove it you need to learn limits and thats a pretty complicated topic that if you havnt done yet you will eventually do
that line being the asymptote
I used to know how to tell stuff like
as x approaches from the left and as x approaches from the right
but to prove it we need to learn limits?
Ii'll look into that then
because I want to be able to prove it beyond just
'look at this graph, boom, you see it? yeah? there you go'
or at least for some reason it bothers me? idk
rigurously yes but currently you dont need to worry about it
with easier functions, yu know.. it's really easy
If you want a better way
just show that you can put smaller and smaller numbers instead of x and show that it grows larger and larger
Isn't it a lot harder with stuff like..
(-log(3x-4)+5)
too do stuff like that?
Like if we just say x is 1
(3-4) = (-1)
(-log(1)+5)
You know how else you could do it
but isn't that still a bit awkward and complicated?
yes
do that and basically the vertical asymptote becomes the horizontal and vice versa
.close
Closed by @orchid agate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain this step?
MæthIsAlwaysRight
but why can you move the negative sign to under
The negative can either be applied to the numerator or the denominator, and the result will be the same.
$\frac{-2}{4}$
USS-Enterprise
This is -1/2, right
yes
USS-Enterprise
This is also -1/2
Dividing a positive by a negative number (or a negative by a positive number) both result in a negative quotient.
thanks @winged moat @jaunty grove @prisma mesa
Then just use the distributive and commutative properties
To distribute the -1 through the parenthesis and then rearrange the terms.
And that's how you get from the first to the second step 🙂
is it wrong to have a negative quotient?
or bad practice
It is not wrong
It's just bad practice usually, yes
but the second step is more elegant
much nicher
nicer
thanks
.close
Closed by @patent quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey how can I solve this.
My first step is $$49^\frac{1}{ln7}$$ but after this I am clueless
!context
No context, but I am doing the chapter: "exp, ln and log"
,tex .exp rules

Use prime factor on 49
Frank
$$(7^2)^\frac{1}{ln7}$$
Frank
$$(7)^\frac{2}{ln7}$$
Frank
,tex .log rules

Now use exp rules to modify that
I have no idea
Switch the exponents
switch?
$$(7^\frac{1}{ln7})^2$$
Frank
what is the difference
And now simplify inside the parenthesis
the only thing I can think of is this right now but I don't think it is right
Down
I want you to use the power rule
I am not that advanced sorry
never heard of power rule
or do you mean multiply?
Do you know that ln(a^b) = blna?
yes I know that one
and why not the 2?
Ok look ar this
You have x^(1/lnx), forget aboit the other 2 ok?
If we apply ln to that
We get
Ln(x^(1/lnx)) = 1/lnx * lnx
That is lnx/lnx = 1
Now we apply the inverse function
e^1
So we can deduce than x^(1/lnx) = e
And we have x as 7
And raised to 2
(7^(1/ln7))^2
e^2
can I give another method?
ofcourse my friend
you can express 7 as e^(ln7)
then I think you can figure out the rest using exponent rules
the 7 from 7^2?
from the base of this
alright I will try
and ask for help if I don't get it
thanks
.close
Closed by @patent quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It is asking for F`(x)
And since the antiderivative of F`(x) is F(x), i just took t^2/(t^2+4) and changed the t to x's
but i don't understand why the t's become x
do you know the fundamental theorem of calculus?
yeah

oooh, there's a command for it
there is, although I need to rewrite it to use d/dx notation throughout
Leibnitz rule
anyway in this case b(x) = x and a(x) = 4
Hey , how do you remember all this
like all the commands? i don't remember all of them but I have a few that I use all the time
NGL , you re great Hayley, nd all the moderators too !
Where can i learn them ?
i no click in brain
can some1 explain this in really simple terms
Like I don't get why you can't just sub the t for x here just like in the previous one
apply the ftoc
idk how
,tex .FTC2
lol
grrrrrrrr 
i see it, i just don't know how to apply it
What's a(x) in your example?
0?
x^5
yes. so a'(x) and b'(x)?
0 and 5x^4
and f(t)?
no idea
5x^9?
no
what's f(t) in the problem?
yes
f(t) is sin(t^4)
yes
and u plug in x^5 for t
yes
no

sin(x^20) * 5x^4
yep, there's your answer 🙂
@lyric crypt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lyric crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@lucid cloak Has your question been resolved?
@lucid cloak Has your question been resolved?
@lucid cloak Has your question been resolved?
@lucid cloak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@wild whale Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What do you call this step in the red text? Not sure where that came from
multiplying by 1
multiplying by 1 in whatever form you choose, a common magic trick
Is there more info about the "multiplying by 1" step? that's my first time hearing that
not much to really say
its often useful to multiply by something over itself
we do it when we rationalise denominators for a common example
1/sqrt(2)= 1/sqrt(2) * sqrt(2)/sqrt(2) = sqrt(2)/2
yeah I remember the rationalizing denominators by the same kind
So you do that step to simplify it basically?
to get it into a more desirable form yeah
Thanks!
did more research, it's very similar to multiplying by the conjugate (i think it is that lol)
.close
Closed by @agile lark
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this particular step is confusing me
what property of the curl is being exploited here?
err cross product rather
@wraith acorn Has your question been resolved?
@wraith acorn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont understand where the +2 in the dominator comes from
Try writing it out for a few small m like 3,4,5
wdym
this is the original problem
im solving it with chatgpt help but im not getting from where does he get the
m(m+1) + 2 (m+1)/2
the 2 ^
Do you know arithmetic sequence?
no
Then it would be a bit difficult
First part means
1+2+3....+n
This is what we call an arithmetic sequence and it's sum is denoted by
n(n+1)/2
ohh okay yh i think i know what you mean
Cool then it should be ok
Main question is you need to find sum of
1+2....+m+m+1
1+2....+m = m(m+1)/2
So total sum becomes
m(m+1)/2 + (m+1)```
yeah i get that
but like then it becomes m(m+1) + 2(m+1)/ 2
but this "2(m+1)" is the thing i dont understand
m(m+1)/2 + (m+1) , you understood this ?
They just multiplied 2 in numerator and denominator
i read once again everyhintg
For 2nd part
Cool
@upbeat saddle Has your question been resolved?
Yea don't use chat gpt for math
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
1. How did they remove X? Did they factor X into X to remove it? And, if so, how does that work? What operation did they do (division, subtraction, etc).
2. I am generally confused about what operations they did exactly across the problem.```
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
bruh it boke
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Any ideas how i would solve (implicit differentiation) of a: $$ \frac{x-y}{x+y} = \frac{x^{2}}{y} + 1. I have tried this, but this is not correct: Please ping me on response :)
Pandora
Why does everytime I do calculation mistakes ahh
No, it should be $$ y' = -\frac{3x^{2}+2xy}{x^2+4y} $$
Pandora
Yap that’s the answer
Start by simplifying the equation
Then its easy
Subtract denominator by nominator in both sides
I definitely fucked up somewhere, but I'm getting closer
👍
thank you sir

sometimes i wonder why i havent gone to an optician
ait, how do i close this bad boy
.close
Closed by @still swan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have two separate but related questions:
- I am trying to find out if the complexified lie algebra of the Lorentz Group, which has commutator relations $[A_i, A_j] = i\epsilon_{ijk} A_k$, $[B_i, B_j] = i\epsilon_{ijk} B_k$ and $[A_i, B_j] =0$, has two ideals (subalgebras closed under the lie bracket) given by $\mathfrak{a} = \text{span}(A_i, A_j, A_k)$ and $\mathfrak{b} = \text{span}(B_i, B_j, B_k)$ as $A_i$ and $B_i$ commute and zero belongs to both the subalgebras. I'm not sure if this is correct, please help me if I'm missing something.
- Is there a way to calculate all the ideals of a given lie algebra? Like for example, for this complexified Lorentz lie algebra?
tensegrity
@normal urchin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @normal urchin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’ve been keep getting wrong answer
What did I do wrong?
Step 2 to step 3
When you write that as (x-2)^2
Look at the constant term. It’s not the same as the previous step
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
Where?
Yeah but converted it to 8/4 after that
the answer is right, but the step is not correct
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What does the probability of independence of event mean? how could one interpret the fact that it becomes P(A)*P(B)? if A and B represent rolling different dices, then what does P(A intercept B) mean?
i think you are talking aboutconditional probability
this one?
no P(A intercept B) = P(A) * P(B)
like if A and B represent rolling different dices, then P(A intercept B) = (6/36) * (6/36)?
yeap its the same see if by doing one event no changes on event B so we will see whats the probability of event 1 and then event 2 (it just becuase of independency) so the ways(probability ) multiplies
YALL PLS HELP
it feels like mixing apples with pears
like A is the outcomes of rolling a dice
BRO I HAVE TO DEAL WITH THIS
2 events are independent if intuitively "knowing about 1 doesn't affect knowing the other"
so for example, if i roll a dice and flip a coin
and 36 is a two dimensional outcome, no?
intuitively those are independent since knowing what happens about 1 doesn't affect what happens with the other
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
create a new post here in one of the non-taken ones
then if i ask what's the probability of flipping a head and rolling a 6
that should be 1/12
cus flipping a head and rolling a 6 have no impact on each other
it turns out that the better way of expressing this idea formally is to use that P(A)*P(B) = P(A and B) cus if A has probability 0 of occuring, then it is independent to everything
I think I get it. I was struggling because I was thinking about 'rolling a dice' instead of an specific event. So, they are multiplied because the sample space becomes the mapping of both event's sample space
thank youu
.close
Closed by @snow reef
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I don't understand this concept of conditional independence. What does P(A|C) and P(B|C) even mean in the example? the probability of rolling a dice given the sum of A and B's outcomes add up to 7?
or even like if A and B are both rolling a dice, then what does A intercept B mean in the conditional independence formula?
in simple words now you have the restriction that let say you rolled 1st dice and it showed 1 so the second dice must be 6 (se its now bounded to be 7-showed on dice 1)
ok, I think I get what you mean, but then when finding P(A|C) we have to calculate P(A intercept C) what does that mean?
all the outcomes of A involved in C?
also, without thinking in terms of probability, what does A intercept B mean when they are independent?
@snow reef Has your question been resolved?
@snow reef Has your question been resolved?
Also, what I dont understand is that is P(A intercept B | C) is defined as P(A and B and C)/P(C) isnt this 1?
isnt P(A and B and C) the same as P(C) in the example?
@snow reef Has your question been resolved?
@snow reef Has your question been resolved?
hellooo
.close
Closed by @snow reef
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone please explain this question?
i get how to do i, i just dont understand ii at all
Find HS
I don't understand the statement of the example above myself but ii is pretty clear
Then round to once decimal place
Like 25.73 becomes 25.7
63.48 becomes 63.5 etc
but i dont get how to find HS
Did you draw a diagram?
Can you share it
@summer saddle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have to show that this is true, how?
$\leftarrow$ it is due to the continuity of $f(x)=|x|$
everg
(what's your definition of lim(...) = 0 when n-> +infinity, it should be pretty obvious)
for the other direction you can do it by using the limit definition
can i get a bit more detailed explanation?
about which implication ?
of how i can prove it, like i understand it, but i don't know how i show it mathemataicly
now that you have the idea try to figure the proof out by yoursefl
we will be glad to read it and (perhaps) correct it
@viral anchor Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @viral anchor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So the question I'm doing has two parts. There are two series, c_n and a_n and then the "p-numbers". The first part is to prove that a_n converging towards A implies that c_n also converges towards A. The second part is to explore if that implication is just an implication or an equivalence, and i'm stuck on that part.
@mossy spindle Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @mossy spindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So I feel this should just be $\neg(P \land Q \implies \neg P \land \neg Q)$
which feels wrong
very wrong
Veni, vidi, perii
May help to remember that the statement "if $A$, then $B$" is the implication $A \implies B$
@vernal matrix
yes, I know that
but it’s not what you wrote
if not P or not Q, then , that doesn't imply that P or Q
right
oops
I messed up the negation of \implies
There really shouldn't be any negation of implications, really...
your assumption should be $\lnot P \lor \lnot Q$ yes?
knief
Veni, vidi, perii
Also this is not what your statement says - it says "...then not [...]", not "...that doesn't imply..."
so that doesn't imply
It implies it is false
Not that it does not imply it is true
Which can occur if unrelated
oops
Why am I struggling over such trivial things?
😭
thanks
so $\neg(P \land Q) \implies \neg (P \vee Q)$
chartbit who would you be without your emojis?
I know right 
What's wrong with this
Check the right hand side, and the original statement
it is not the case that P or Q
Veni, vidi, perii
This feels so wrong
it is not the the case that P or Q
that intutively doesn't mean this, does it
either that or it's just my bad english
"it's not the case that I'm either the fastest, or the best"
It does
Btw you’ll notice this is the contrapositive
Contrapositives look nasty with the negations
Just read the stuff more
Get familiar with it
Gaslight yourself into thinking it makes sense
It’s just a dictionary translation, the actual ability to manipulate the expressions is what counts
Rather than making precise statements out of natural language
That's easy enough, I mostly struggle with the english to logic translations
Thanks
This would just be $[P \implies (Q \implies R)] \implies [ (P \land Q) \implies R]$
right
Yes but uh
For reasons of non-associativity, you’d wanna say P -> (Q -> R) for this class
Once you get further it’s assumed to be bracketed like that usually, but the order of doing it matters
Veni, vidi, perii
Compare P -> (Q -> R) to (P -> Q) -> R
Yeah so just watch out there
5(d)
so to start, I compared it with a natural sentance
"I'll be fine only if you'll be fine"
but that's obviously not the case here
Like this should be $P \implies R$ but that's obviously false
Veni, vidi, perii
“Only if” is stupid, don’t worry too much about it
It’s false, but that is a well formed formula
Is that the right answere here
By stupid I mean no actual mathematician says it outside of it and only if
Dawg it’s been so long since I’ve seen “only if” used unironically idk, but I believe so yes
It’s the converse in iff I think
Thanks
The discriminant is negative only if the quadratic equation has no real solutions.
so this would be if the quadratic equation has no real solutions, then the discriminant us negative
right
Well, it's confusing at first glance, so I'm very likely to be tested on it
I think
Literally real, but only to never be useful
I have my qualms with logic pedagogy and PR
I mean I literally was yesterday
cool, thanks
So this would be
" if the angles of a triangle are congruent, then it is equilateral "
My classmates say it's the other way round, as did my teacher, I'm really confused now
*said yesterday
Yes
Look dawg I dunno, it’s probably the most worthless convention out there in logic
Like they say it's of the form P only if Q
Once you get past the intro stuff it’ll never show up again
@ivory sorrel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Aya
Maybe find the average in integral form
you can use feynman's trick to integrate this
I'mma try
@strong sable Has your question been resolved?
I'm cooked again I don't even have a clue how to analyze it
Aya
What's this..
Tried feynman for the avg in 0 to 1
Idk man this seems like out of my capabilites
<@&286206848099549185> Help him pls
!15min
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
it's been 15 min?
Oh you mean like no one answers in 15 min THEN
?
hllo?
What's wrong with you? We already discussed for more than 15 mins?!
yes but idt u asked or something
anyways if u did my bad
Your message is unhelpful, just stop.
Sure
@strong sable Has your question been resolved?
ok has anyone solved this yet? I tried
@strong sable Has your question been resolved?
What did you get
I sent you a dm
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
proof that (cos2alpha+cos2beta)/(1+cos2(alpha+beta))=cos(alpha-beta)/cos(alpha+beta)
im kinda stuck
for anyone who wants to help ^^^
ty
wait no
u did it wrong
its cos2alpha not cos^2alpha
@neon iron
$\frac{cos2 \alpha + cos2 \beta}{1 + cos2 (\alpha + \beta)} = \frac{cos(\alpha - \beta)}{cos(\alpha + \beta)}$
Sleepy
^^
i did L.H.S=$\frac{cos^2 \alpha - sin^2 \alpha + cos^2\beta - sin^2\beta}{1 + cos^2 (\alpha + \beta) - sin^2(\alpha + \beta}$
Sleepy
@ancient cloud Has your question been resolved?
Use this on numerator and for denominator, use cos2A = 2cos^2A - 1
then its a 1 step answer
can you try approaching the answer from this?
|| retrace your step to arrive at original problem and use my method
|| /s But honestly, if I see cos^2 x - sin^2 x I convert it to cos2x
tbf you have reduced it to primitives which doesnt go anywhere. I would try to reduce the right hand side to similar form if possible
so start from the rhs?
If you are hell bent on using this, then that would be my approach, yes

