#help-23
1 messages · Page 429 of 1
looks sus for a question
ok, so not the original
always post the original especially if people ask for it
anyway let's focus on the core property here
a(b - c) = ab - ac
do you have any issue with that?
im gonna be honest i dont really know what that means in this context
im shit at math i must admit
im sorry
this is the distributive property
gotcha
when you multiply into a sum/difference, you multiply into each term
yeah
which is what
a(b-c) = ab - ac
saya
i know the distributive property i just dont know how it relates to this problem
distribution is the process of going from
a(b-c) to ab - ac
common factor factoring
Is the process of going from
ab - ac to a(b-c)
The same property is being applied
@chilly condor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for d it says answer is semi eulerian
but the network is neither eulerian or semi eulerian
What, isn't it neither?
@fossil coral Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i don't understand what is wrong with my exam board why do they treat a standard high school a level like it's a university admissions test 😭
(i) was fine but
I0 = e - 0(...) = e, I1 = e - 1(e) = 0, I2 = e - 2(0) = e, J2 = e/2
r = 2 implies that sum is equal to 1/2
but (1/e)(1+(-1)^2(J2) = 1/e + 1/2
so 1/e + 1/2 = 1/2
?
cant even get the freaking base case correct
careful, it's indexed for only positive n
oh
so your base case is actually n=1
uhhh so true
what you mean is for the In bit in (i)
that is n >= 1 sure
but then how do i find I1
because the definition i got in (i) is not very useful
i mean i could manually work out the integral again
because it was just the integral of (x^n)e^x iirc
but idk if i want to do allat again
you could probably use the recurrence relation of (i)
it ought to be true that I1 = e - I_0
yes but then what is I0
same as I_n with n=0, just int_1^e dx
bounds
or directly you could do IBP on ln(x)dx
@formal wolf Has your question been resolved?
You can set K_n = (-1) ^n J_n if that makes the telescoping easier to see
Notably, the I only go down to I_1 = 1 > for reasonable purposes
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i give a specific bijection f:A∪B -> {1,2,...,a+b} if all i know about A and B is that they are finite ? the broader context is in the image attached to this post
More importantly, you have that A and B are finite and disjoint. Aka no element in A can be in B and viceversa.
For the first assumption that is
i'm not sure how that helps here. do i use a piecewise definition for f based on whether x is an element of A or B ?
something like that ?
wait, that's not quite right i think, what if b is smaller than a
that makes even less sense when i think about it more, writing it like that doesn't tell me what element x gets projected onto anyways
Tbh im writing a proof for it but its a bit of magic wand waving
im not happy with it
Resumes to:
Show that there is a f that maps injectively from AuB to Z
and there is an inverse f⁻¹ that maps bijectively from a restriction of Z to AuB
We call the restriction rZ for the sake of ease of writing
Now, from the definition of disjoint sets, we can show that there is some partition of rZ that divides the set into those elements who map into A and those who map into B
Now, we know that |rZ| = |AuB|
It's a typo, instead of b should be a+b
something like that could work ?
This was correct
Just in the last line replace b with a+b
And that |rZ_a| = |A|, |rZ_b| = |B|
|rZ_a| + |rZ_b| = |rZ|
Still, a bit convoluted
One question, aren't the sets arbitrary or why do they start from 1, 2 etc.
I assume it its some form of arbitrary counting of elements
yeah ok cause it would be silly with the case A n B = {}
I dont think so really cause you cant precisely assume that |AuB| = |A|+|B|
that's the definition for finite we were given
Really weird way to define finite sets.
Kannst du die deutsche version posten
i wanted to put the whole thing in english before as well but the formating fell appart when copy pasting
Oh ok
Dachte
So like A approx {1,2,...,n} means there is a bijection cause they have the same cardinality
is that not standard notation ? i've been told this lecture has weird notation last time i asked for help here
Anyway, can't you just say AuB={c_1,c_2, ... c_{a+b}} and then define f(i)=c_i
with index set {1,2,...,a+b}
i think so ? the way i did it also workd tho, right ? i'm kind of focused on the second part of the hint from the problem right now
btw, since you speak german, is it correct that abbildung is called projection in english ?
no we say map
oh, i see
@sturdy raven Has your question been resolved?
i mean, technically the initial one has but when i'm done with the whole task i'd like to ask if i did it right (also i'm pretty sure another question on this will arise before i'm done)
this is correct ? (other than that i accidentally wrote "mit" thrice instead of "mit" and "und")
f : A U B -> {1,2, ... a+b} makes no sense it should be the other way
A U B approx A U B is also redundant
also the notation xalpha is weird, probably means alpha(x)

I think your proof goes into the right direction but you have the same issue with g you did in f
Oh wait I think I am mistaken actullay bruh
I've been told the same last time I asked something here but that's the way we did it in that lecture and the prof said this was standard notation but analysis uses the "strange" notation f(x)
I went by the definition {1,2,...,n} -> A but the other way should still work by the assumptions
I think I might have misread that part in 3.1b (screenshot from before) by accident
i can’t read german but why is the proof so long?
It should work either way though
The proof in English is on the right side of the screenshot
Because both sets have the same cardinality anyways or why ?
Like if f : {1,2,...a} -> A is bijection then g : A ->{1,2,...a} as well (inverse)
and you stayed consistent, so I think your proof works
The steps are sound to me
I think I'll switch it around to match the definition anyways just to be safe tho
Sure
this is not right
yeah typo
It should be f:AuB->[im not sure here] ?
I would omit it but it should be technically something like A U B -> {1,2, ..., l+m+n} or something
you mean you would just cut out that whole line ?
ja, because it only states the goal of what you want to prove
it's like a note for yourself but not part of the proof
also, do i understand correctly that there are three variables l,n,b because the left part of the map has three summands (that sounds wrong but several translation dictionarries gave me that translation for the german "Summand")
yes
The partioning follows from your disjunct case
Now that I think about it, maybe you dont even need to reconstruct g
From the first case we know |A+B|=|A|+|B| so you would apply that twice basically and be done
what if we had something like |AuB|=|A|*|B| instead ? would we get AuB->{1,...,m*n} ?
do you mean |AxB|?
no but that case would also interest me
this isnt always true tho
{1,2,3} U {1,2,3} = {1,2,3} => |{1,2,3}|=3
but |{1,2,3}| * |{1,2,3}| = 3 * 3 = 9
I think your real question is how the index set is supposed to look like
and the idea is to have as many elements as the set you map on
i just noticed, it should be like this towards the end, right ?
ja but i dont think you need this
tbh, if the solution i have works i'm fine with that one even if something more elegant exists. we discuss different students' solutions a week after the due date anyways
I mean yeah it's mechanical but my point is you could use what you had already else why consider the disjoint case at all
i just don't want to rewrite it (plus i already get the logic of the way i wrote it down and kind of want to take a break for a bit before doing the next task)
thanks for helping tho

cool profile picture btw. i think i can close this thread now, or is there something more to be said ?
Closed by @sturdy raven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is it true that
cos(x) = cos(|x| mod 2π)
It makes sense and gives proper results, but my calculator says that "parameters are out of bounds"
Aight, thanks.
Do you perchance know what could my calculator mean by that error?
what did you type in ur calc
I assumed it is i who made a mistake
But maybe the calc just isnt equipped to handle things like that idk
Ill try on desmos
So in desmos i got scattered vertical lines for every x=π in both direction
And a warning that the plot may not have fine details
But ill presume the identity to be true, it works good enough for me.
!solved
!solved
.close
Closed by @exotic gull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
part b
i'm not sure how to go about this
Well, theta is assumed to be small.
Small angle approximations
do you know about the taylors expansions?
Only when theta is small does the equation turn into a quadratic equation, so that assumption must be maintained; extraneous solutions are exiled from the solution set.
@fringe dock Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
!da2a
Asking the actual question right away is more likely to get responses.
Asking "Can I ask...?" or "Does anyone know about...?" doesn't give people enough information to decide whether they can help, and answering can feel like a promise to help with the actual question, which they might find themselves unable to.
f(a) = b
f(b) = a
Determine the linear form f(x) = mx + b
I don’t rlly understand how to get it
What is meant by 'determine the linear form f(x) = mx + b'?
Oh the b just means y intercept
Closed by @vast pilot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
revisiting some linear algebra and I'm having some trouble with how to read this. Specifically what "G x G -> G defined on G" means.
AxB refers to the cartesian product of two sets, in this case, the same set.
The easiest way to showcase how it works is to do a basic example:
A = {1,2}
B = {3,4}
AxB = { (1,3) , (1,4) , (2,3) , (2,4) }
You take one element of the first set and one element of the second and write them as an ordered pair.
For instance, IR^2 (the set of two-tuples of real numbers, usual vectors) is in reality IR x IR
Now, if some function maps from
AxA -> A
We say that its a binary operation over A.
For example:
- : IN x IN -> IN
Is the "addition" function over natural numbers.
Take 2 and 4, as (2,4); and as we all know, 2+4 = 6.
So + maps (2,4) -> 6
Oh okay, so ⊗ is a binary operation defining the cartesian product of two sets?
No, it doesnt define it; it maps from the cartesian product of a set, to that original set.
The cartesian product is just a construction of two sets.
Okay so a binary operation that maps from the cartesian product of a set G to the original set
That's not so bad
Its just the formalization of what addition,multiplication,division,exponentiation,etc are.
If youve ever had a calculus 2/3 course, you technically already know how they work
f(x,y), f : IR^2 -> IR
is technically a binary operation.
Thanks man I appreciate the help
np.
.close
Closed by @wise lotus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im stuck on bi
@barren fjord Has your question been resolved?
I'm curious about it actually
I found 10+dx/dt (2+t) - d^2 x/dt^2
all evaluated in t=0 as the maclaurin series
how can I deal with the derivatives?
I quite literally dk what to do
I tried taking f(t)=5(t+1) cosht
But that got me 5 and not 6
Hello!
hello
not quite
Can someone help pls
you have 5(t + 1)cosh(t) - 0.5x + dx/dt = 0.5 d^2x/dt^2 and we know f is a solution to this. we want f(0) + f’(0)t. we know from before that f(0) = 6 so we just need to find f’(0). to find f’(0) you can just plug in t = 0 and x = f(t) to the differential equation
Hmm
Im a bit confused
Which part of the equation is f(t)
What does it mean by particular sol
they say x = f(t) is a solution
it solves the differential equation with the proper initial conditions
f(0) = 6
did you solve a ii
Particular integral is this right ?
youll need it here
never heard of "particular integral"
Oh ok
I thought this might like plugging x into the solution
yes wherever you see x write f(t)
$5(t + 1)\cosh t - 0.5f(t) + \dv{f}{t} = 0.5\frac{d^2f}{dt^2}$
knief
Ahhh
so let’s just put t = 0 in and figure it out
since this equation must hold if f is a solution
Ok
you know the definition of cosh t right
yes
Ye
e^x + e^-x / 2
Im allowed a calculator tho
i see
I see where it comes from now!
😭😭😭
Also for ci
When I subbed in 0.25 I got 4.57
Why do you subtract that from 6?
Noo I was able to do ci without doing b
I just noticed that 6-4.57 =1.43
i see
yes because f gives the displacement from O
it starts 6 meters away from O and starts traveling towards O
if after a quarter of a second it is now 4.57 meters away then it has traveled 6 - 4.57 =1.43 meters towards O
maybe draw a picture if you have to
if we are 6 feet apart from each other then after 0.25 seconds we are 4.57 feet apart
Oh i assumed it started at the origin
how far did i move in that time?
1.43feet
yep
yea there’s a lot to keep track of in this question
when is it
Thursday
is this ap calc?
Im not American
oh
A levels
😅not sure what ur referring to
maybe i’m thinking of A*
From an E to A*
Thanks
Do you have any last minute tips for questions like these
I tend to just get overwhelmed and confused I wasn’t able to get past thinking that f(t)=5(t+1)cosht
i don’t know that there are any tricks but a major issue for most people is picking up on the little things they say in these paragraphs and then translating it into whatever math they gave you beforehand
like you have to be able to read something then connect it to what they just told you
here the big thing was knowing to use x = f(t) in the differential equation
and knowing that since it’s a solution we can just plug everything in
yes this can be hard
just read it slow
read every sentence a few times over if you have to
if they say something it’s almost always important
they rarely give irrelevant information
That’s true
How did you know to do that
experience
😭
yea i mean unfortunately there is no shortcut
you have to familiarize yourself with these patterns of thinking
until it’s just natural
Guess I left it too late
A day
they are pretty much all the same format
I’ve done almost all of the past papers by now and I still got stuck
Probably
everyone i’ve helped with this subject has this habit
But I only started actually revising recently so I feel like I don’t have enough time to actually attempt the question
they don’t immediately know what to do and don’t bother spending more than a minute on a problem grappling with the words
Bc my exam is so close
yea this is unfortunate
being in the panic mindset of needing to get everything done quick is counterproductive
learning math requires a lot of focus
i would say spend more time on one problem
Im just hoping in the exam im able to see what i need to do
don’t think you need to get through every paper in such a short time frame
make sure you feel comfortable with a few after a lot of investment
But to be honest
Theres a couple topics that I spent ages learning
Like polar coords and de movires theorem
And I’m still not able to solve them even after like 30 mins
what did you use to study
So even with practice the maths doesn’t come naturally to me
My notes from class and the textbook
i can’t really comment much on your "studying technique" but i’m sure there is something there that is the problem
even if you don’t know it
math is hard to learn though
i can’t imagine trying to learn math if i wasn’t so interested in it
I used to enjoy it a lot
But it’s not fun when it becomes hard and I just struggle with the paper
Yeah if I don’t get an A I won’t get into uni
well
i don’t know about that
maybe you won’t get into the cambridge math department
but i’m sure you can still get into uni
Yeah true haha
what do you want to do
yea so youll definitely need strong math
are you doing better in physics
chemistry
Yh
so it’s not so bad then
you’re most confident in math?
I have four maths papers
I have 2 are core further maths like de movires, differential equations, hyperbolics etc
1 stats paper and one further pure paper with has number theory and group theory which I hate
I also have three standard maths paper pure, mech and stats
secondary school
But those should be easy enough
american education is terrible lmao
Sixth form
😭
16-18
yea so like 10th-12th grade for americans
Yeh
||-2||
where i live the only requirement was to finish algebra 2
but they actually set that back further i think
so you don’t need to finish algebra 2
you can just take some remedial algebra along with a financial math class to finish your math in high school
most kids took algebra 2
probably about a third took precalculus
and like a fifth took calculus
that was it though
and the curriculums for each of those courses covered far less than you do in the uk
i went to public school though
So do I
there are private schools that can be pretty intense
To be honest I just chose really hard courses
It’s only necessary to do maths up to a gcse level
yea you want to go to uni though so you pretty much have to do a levels
Yh
But I do further maths which is only needed to top unis
You get can get away with just doing standard maths for most unis
so you want to go to oxford or cambridge or something
Well I did but I was rejected
i see
Which is really stupid because they’re often inflated and based on ur teacher
🤣
Im having a crisis abt whether i should even do engineering 😭😭😭
what makes you want to do engineering
did you google careers with the highest paying salaries or do you genuinely like stem
Engineering isn’t even well paid in the Uk
It’s better than average but nothing like American salaries
Ib and medicine
ib pays well everywhere i’m sure
Yh true
Honestly I didn’t know what to pick
no lockheed martin huh
fair
most people don’t know what they want to do at 17-18
Yeah I had to pick my a levels at 16😭😭😭 I basically spun a wheel
😬
😅
become a vet
That would be kinda fun
Yk I regret not doing bio bc I feel like doing med would be cool
Yep
there’s a lot you can pivot to afterwards
My mum said that abt engineering
Like u can basically work anywhere after
But with med ur stuck in the nhs
yea this is true
you can work in a lot of different industries
maybe this isn’t such a bad thing
idk
I mean it’s better than the American system
Anyways ty for ur help it’s getting kinda late so byebye
@barren fjord Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
\textbf{Definition - Class Functional:} A \textit{class functional} is an L-formula $\varphi(x,y)$ with 2 free variables (might mention other sets) such that $\forall x \exists^{\leq 1}y \varphi(x, y)$.
\\
Fix a class functional $\varphi(x,y)$ possibly mention sets $b_1, b_2$.
\\
Slang: For any set $A$, the imagine of $\varphi$ restricted to $A$ is a set. i.e ${y : (\exists x \in A)\varphi(x,y)}$ is a set.
\\
Example ${{n}: n \in \omega}$ is a set.
\\
More formally, for all L-formulas, $\varphi(x,y,z_1, ..., z_k)$ we have an axiom.
\\
$\forall z_1, .., \forall z_k$ [If $\forall x \exists^{\leq 1} y \varphi(x,y,z_1,...,z_k)$ then $\forall A\exists B \forall w ( w\in b \iff (\exists u \in A)\varphi(u, w, z_1, ..., z_k)$]
toast
hi i just want to review, can someone explain what a class functional exactly is with examples, and possibly explain what the rigorous definition of replacement is doing?
well
in my opinion replacement scheme kinda just lets me make sets like
{x in X : f(x)}
a little different from separation scheme since a set generated from separation is awlays a subset of the original set itself
or maybe more accurartely its. {f(x) : x in X}
@tranquil geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tranquil geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
\textbf{Cardinal Exponentiation} \
Suppose $X, Y$ are sets, ${}^{X}Y = {f: X \to Y }$ (f function). So ${}^{\lambda}\kappa = {$ all functions $f: \lambda \to \kappa }$.
\\
\textbf{Definition:} $\kappa^\lambda = |{}^\lambda \kappa|$.
toast
I am having a tough time "understanding" this definition
Why?
We can talk about function spaces as sets as well
Elements of sets don't just have to be numbers (or similar items)
makes sense
We can talk about sets whose elements are entire functions
ye
This is the notation we need for such a thing, at its most base case
Well, the simplest way to consider a set of functions would be the set of all functions with the same input space and the same output space
e.g. the set of all functions f with domain X and codomain Y
i.e. the ^X Y definition you've just sent
Note this is a set
Again, notation-wise, we're denoting here Y^X to mean the cardinality of the set ^X Y
We essentially need some notation to discuss things like this, yes
else this shit gets unwieldy fast
hmm
everything makes sense here
it just seems like we consider elements of functions without providing motivation for it
or is just
really hard to define it otherwise
It's more that we can consider functions themselves as elements of a set
That's the sole motivation for now
Lemma to prove btw - check that such a "set" {f:X -> Y} is in fact a set
ye but why functions and not like relations or something
hmm
Relations are rather simple in comparison that this is almost trivial
functions are subsets of relations right
Any relation R comparing to elements X and Y results in a set some subset of the product X x Y
ye
and a function is a special subset of a relation right
ye
Because given x in X, there can be at most one y in Y such that f(x) = y, else it's not a function
But since functions are more useful in that regard, it might be more useful to jump straight to defining this sort of set instead
Incidentally, this sort of thing is called a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_space
In mathematics, a function space is a set of functions between two fixed sets. Often, the domain and/or codomain will have additional structure which is inherited by the function space. For example, the set of functions from any set X into a vector space has a natural vector space structure given by pointwise addition and scalar multiplication. ...
P(X x Y) by powerset axiom, then we can just use separation to create a set {f : X -> Y}
ah
ah okay i think here iis motivation
since we really cared about ordinals
a function like
f: 2 -> 3 would be like "combinations"
and ig a function is a good way
Also, I might be wrong, but I believe the restriction with relations is that the codomain IS the domain
You're talking about how two elements in the same set relate
But functions don't necessarily have that restriction per se
ah
x |-> x+1000 with input space [0,1] has a range far away from the domain, for instance
So I could let X = [0,1] and Y = [1000, 1001] to describe f
And then I could consider the set of functions with those two sets X, Y
hmm
That said, there is apparently something called heterogenous relations, where xRy requires x in X, y in Y, where X != Y
kk
i think this more or less makes sense
especially when considering ordinals
.solved
Closed by @tranquil geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do these
<@&268886789983436800> there's one more here.
is it normally purple
do PEMDAS
or rather GEMDAS
whichever ones you guys have
simplify the inside of the groupings, then do exponents, then multiplication/division then addition/subtraction
oh wait it's naming properties
nvm it’s been almost an hour and no one has answered the same question
I just used AI atp
ai bad
I know
No one in here was answered me for 10 straight minutes and some other dude was bringing me in 5 different directions at once
.close
Closed by @unreal mango
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with 7 and 8
if you take just any point (x, y) on the plane and reflect it over the line y=x, what happens to that point?
in other words, what are the new coordinates?
yes so if the points swap, then you can directly just swap x and y in the equation and solve for y
this is the same as finding the inverse, if you have covered that in class yet
what does that mean yo
so you have y = 2x + 5
yes
your points are being "inverted," right?
or "swapped"
that's all we're doing, just swapping x and y
^
that's all you need to do, and you have your equation y = something
no, say you have some equation 5H + 2J = 3K and i ask you to solve for H in terms of J and K
you would just isolate H by itself on one side so you get H = something, right?
that's all we're doing here
x = 2y + 5 is your answer, we just want it in the form y = something
close
its supposed to be 2.5 but wtf do i get 2.5 from
show your work step by step
instead of dividing by 2 first try to get 2y by itself on one side to start.
if you wanted to divide by 2 first you can, you just have to divide everything by 2
this is js an example but what would happen if i had to relfect jt over a y=2 line
reflecting over a horizontal line is a bit different from this, because you would keep the same x-values but different y-values
a rule you can use is that the new y-value would be 2k - (the original y-value)
where "k" is the number in y = k, in this case 2
well, what does a 180 degree rotation do intuitively
i think i can figure ut out
its just like rotating a regular point
thanks for ur help
yes
how do i quit
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @waxen prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the cofinality of $\omega + \omega + \omega$?
toast
I thought it would just be $\aleph_0$
toast
Well specifically the question is what is the cofinality of $\omega_1 + 5 + \omega \cdot 3$
toast
@tranquil geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tranquil geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Would it just be aleph 0?
Or just omega.3.?
Make sense there.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What’s going on with the yellow?
solving the system of equations above
first step subtracting equation 3 from equation 1 and then using that to solve for lambda 2
then substituting that value for lambda 2 into equation 1 to find lambda 1
since equation 2 was not used at all in that process, you still have to double check lambda 1 and lambda 2 values you found satisfy it
if they are linearly independent, yes
Linearly independent?
well for sets of two vectors they're linearly independent if one can't be expressed as a scalar multiple of the other
@hoary seal Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hoary seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Part c
Could someone please spot where I went wrong
Only consider the working above the red line
This is wrong for one
sin(pi) is 0
Also what happened to distributing the pi to the integral on the line above
etc
Hmm I forgot to do that…
How many marks should I award myself?
3 ig?
I see, and which marks did I get
The first three
Is it ok if I plug in the limits here to avoid writing a long expression in terms of trig functions?

If you do it correctly, then sure
Noted, thanks again!

.close
Closed by @daring sonnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-23 message
,pin
look d^y/ dx^2
=0
then d(dy/dx)/dx =0
now use that
and u will get the 2 points where maximum and minimum occurs
of dy/dx
@daring sonnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What’s this slide saying?
basically asking whether a multiplicative identity exists in the sense of vector dot product
can you find a vector x such that dot product of a and x is a
What’s multiplicative identity
if x multiplied by a gives a , x is a multiplicative identity
like 1 multiplied by a gives a , in the sense of multiplying in real numbers
I see
Yeah the identity vector of <1, 1>?
can you observe that , a definite “multiplicative identity” does not exist in the vector space
The main difference here is that a conventional product takes two objects and produces another object (all of the same type).
Notice that the dot product takes two vectors, but it’s doesn’t produce a vector: it produces a scalar. Then as they hint, it doesn’t really make sense to speak of some multiplicative identity.
But we can multiply a vector by an identity vector
thats scalar multiplication, not dot product
I mean compute dot product
Not multiplication
It should give us back the vector we started
notice how $\vec{A} \cdot \vec{X} = A$ only has 2 trivial solutions for X , which will depend on what $\vec{A}$ is, hence there will not be any special vector that will always satisfy $\vec{A} \cdot \vec{X} = A$
If there is 2 solutions then shoudnt a dot x = a be satisfied?
Mr. Smith
Wdym?
I don’t know tbh
What is it
Oh ur multiplying by 1
Which leaves the original object unchanged
@hoary seal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am doing C.A.T Math comp, and my questions are like this one, could someone please explain to me how I do it?
ignore the thing before the picture
there's no information there
no wait
it lists windows that don't count
still you can ignore it
at the beginning
So is the answer 4?
Since one window already got replace, and the others are next to 4.
it should be 2 at most
24 25 have 4 neighbors
ok i guess there's 2 interpretations, ignore the door or not doesn't matter
Wait, so how do I work this out?
k
it's unconscious
I think I got it
there are no steps to determining when a window has 4 neighbour
the answer should be 1
it's 24 and 25 but 25 is already listed
Closed by @scarlet mantle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
This what I did but it’s wrong because I remember school saying it was 6
Question is to find d btw
What is it?
do you remember the formula to find the sum of n natural numbers?
Yea 1/2(n)(n+1)
can we figure out a way to apply that formula for the summation on the right hand side?
can we break 11 to 14 into 1 to 14 minus 1 to 10?
Uhh wait 1s
Is it 10 instead of 11
Ok
To include 11!,
So the two summations of 1 to 10 cancel
Because r-1
but we are starting with r=1
Ah
not r=0
Wait it doesn’t cancel tho
?
yes
we did that so we could just calculate faster
we can directly apply the summation formula n(n-1)/2 now
Closed by @forest osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why’s there only one set of coordinates when x can = 0. AI claims it’s a mistake. Is this true?
Also is it wrong to calculate instead of simplifying like there
there only one point where x = 0, because only (x, 2 + (0)^2e^-4(0)) is on the graph of the function?
or do you mean something else
I mean in the mark scheme, the set of coordinates doesn’t include that point
Is there a reason
oh right okay sorry I misunderstood
no yeah that's just a mistake
Only one set of coordinates
Ahh okay, and in the exam how do u write out the two set of coordinates?
Is there a plus between them
You can never go wrong writing it out: "The stationary points are (a, b) and (c, d)"
Alr thank u and one last question
mhm?
Is this fine
It might want an exact value, because that's what the marking key has
In the worked answer they just gave the simplified terms no calculation
was left in the form of e
Some simplification
Substitution in values and evaluating usually isn't what they are testing for so it should be fine to do that
and that's as an exact value, because e is irrational so you can't really simplify it further without doing some rounding. Both can
Oh okay I didn’t know
I would check with my teacher if I were you. I don't know what your marking keys would look like
Alr tysm for helping
np!
Closed by @sullen orchid
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im confused why both 8v and 8x are -
shouldnt they be opposite
since 8v is a resistive force to 8x
they both should be -ve here
since your finding max speed
can u elaborate pls?
your partical would go ahead of point P
so your force would be in -ve dirn
and air resistance is in dirn opposite to dirn of motion
well actually the max speed would happen when partical is at point P
the partical is doing dampened occilatory motion
but max speed would still occur at P
oh wait your asking abt the intial time
mb i mesunderstood
im mainly asking about why theyre both -ve
point P is at x=0 and your partical is at point x=a
mb im struggling to process ur wxplanation
i dont do physics so all of this is so confusing 😭
i was explaining something different
ohh
so your force would be in -ve x direction
like how a pendulum moves
its attracted to the middle position (lowest position)
your partical is at the far right end
yeah
but still shouldnt the resistive force be opposite to it regardless
bcs its resistive
yeah it should be in the +ve x direction
wait lemme reread the question
i think the equation written is the correct one tho
elaborate
as in -8x-8v=2a is the answer
well
it gives u the correct DE to then find the answer
A bit late to the discussion here tbh
But, x is the position over the line, v is the velocity at any point, formally known as dx/dt
And the force translated to some acceleration, which we know is d²x/dt²
this is pretty much whats going on
the black ball thingy is the object
its in +ve x direction
at rest initially
Notably, consider that for us, the force doesnt immediatly translate to acceleration, since the mass ≠ 1
yeah
since its at rest initially and the force is applyed in -ve direction
so it gains an accel in -ve diretion which causes a velocity in -ve direction
which makes reistance force(air) be in +ve direction
right
ok
so -8x+8v where v is speed
but since the velocity is negative its like -8x-8v
wait
v is speed
it doesnt have a direction
its always positive
so to decide its direction you look at which direction the ball is going
and put it in opposide direction
tbh dwag all u can do now is just focus on makes the digrames correctly
and hoping you can do the math involved
yh which is why when its speed the resistive force is opposite
but then cause we know its direction we can change to -??
which direction is the air resistance in this diagram
@split kayak did i do something wrong here
Gimme a sec im literally in the gym rn
is that the final answer or how they assumed the forces?
This is gonna be the shittiest diagram ive ever done
lol
i useing a mouse n paint
it gives u the correct DE u need to get the answer so ye
the final answer
wuts DE
Differential equation
i think they did it wrong then
caus the force and resistance force would be opposite to each other unless they partical goes past point P
and the max speed would happen when Fnet=0 towards the right of P
@bright bough Has your question been resolved?
Mb i took so fucking long 🥀
Assume the particle P at some point is at rest, at the left of O
We measure its position as a negative, or, equivalently, a vector pointing to the left.
Now, since we know the force pulls it to the origin, then we know that the force (F) and the position (x) have opposite direction
Which we denote as the force being -kx
In our case, its F = -8x
Now, if we start considering movement in itself, we know that air friction acts as a force that opposes the movement.
If you consider the situation after some time (where the force has managed to accelerate the particle) Then a velocity vector appears, and with it, its air friction force (μ)
hmm pkay
i think its making sense so far
are you saying force us -ve and resistance is +ve?
They come up from different magnitudes
F = -8x
μ = -8v
It happens to be that v points opposite to x in this case.
If we define v = dx/dt
So, yes, they are both negative, but its because one of them "resists the particle getting away" and the other "resists the particle going fast."
As in, one relates to the position, the other one to the current velocity. If the particle is at "O", then theres no force of attraction since its already at the point of the attractor
If its velocity turns 0, then there will be no air friction
@bright bough u with me so far?
In this part of the diagram you can see that F goes opposite to x and μ goes opposite to v.
We ignore the fact that these are vectors cause they all are alligned to this imaginary line
i thinkkk its making sense
,tex Well, now, from here, we have that $\Sigma F = ma \implies -8(x+\frac{dx}{dt}) = (2)a$