#help-23
1 messages · Page 414 of 1
anyway i dont need rigor that much, sorry if that was unclear
im just doing this for the fun
f(x) equals to g(x) over some constant that gives fx , sorry but isnt that it 😭 ??
what are u confusing this for
again, counterexample is translation
bois??
What?
read the first paragraph
I dont get it
what does 'all the bois' mean
what the hell does 'all the bois' mean then
ive never heard anyone use 'bois' like this
@simple galleon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am unsure of what to do as that matrix can't be multiplied
You wrote A as rows and used the formula for columns
A should have the vectors of the subspace you're projecting on in column form
so transpose your A
@vernal tree
@vernal tree Has your question been resolved?
Huh?
Oh shit
Sorry
but then the determinant is 0?
so there's no inverse?
?
The subspace spanned by (1,0,0) and (0,0,1) is just the xz-plane, since every vector in it has the form (x,0,z).
So the orthogonal projection of a general vector $(x,y,z)$ onto that plane is simply
$(x,y,z)\mapsto (x,0,z),$
Paul Dirac
see in the class I am taking it was explained as just using A(AA^T)^-1 A^T
Paul Dirac
Finally . . .
?
This is the orthogonal projection matrix
You can also dont use formula
Are you just saying that they gave a formula in class and you are trying to use that?
yes
he didn't explain what it does
or what it is
Did you understand my procedure?
just this formula
yes
Then I would focus on the geometry first, because the formula makes more sense once you know what the projection is doing
I understand that it is projecting the x and z vectors
what's the geometry?
it is projecting onto the plane spanned by the x and z directions, not “projecting the x and z vectors
The geometry is: the span of (1,0,0) and (0,0,1) is the xz plane
Paul Dirac
So it's projecting something in 3D to a 2D plane along XZ?
Just a sec...
Paul Dirac
@vernal tree Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vernal tree
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for part b, how would u know when u should expand the brackets first before integrating and when to dive straight into using by parts or other strategies?
in the second pic, i initially did by parts but it looked a bit too complicated for just 4 marks
if your denominator is a single term, usually just expanding it works well
also the whole point of integration by parts is to make your new integral simpler than it originally was
your new integral is simply
ya know
worse
yeah 😭
so that wasnt a good idea
whenever i see a product or something where i can turn it into a product, i just jump into doing by parts
i mean try to make sense of it right
usually ibp is good if differentiating a term makes it vanish or reduce its order
ahh i see
Closed by @obtuse kettle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ofc
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
theres like 2 more channels with this too
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
Well no because your graph isn't a function at all
it fails vertical line test?
in certain cases, a fixed x corresponds to several y's
in limits i assume
whats this have to do with it? sory for askng
for example at x = -3 does the function you drew return only one value?
oh crap it fails the vertical line test
yes
Show the entire question. Looks like you're supposed to graph a different function for each limit option
no
this is like all in one
the bullet points are properties of the function f(x)
why is there a vertical asymptote at + infinity at -2^-?
It looks like you need to delete some unnecessary parts
the question or the graph?
oh woops
ill restart it, i got the asymptotes right at last
least
@twin prawn did you manage to solve it?
im stuck :/
why?
mark the conditions you have now and see which ones you are missing
try to finish the vertical asymptotes
but i dont know how to do the vertical asymptotes tho
the -2^+ seems like an imposibility
why?
i cant think of how to draw it
however you can also delete the horizontal asymptote at y=0
yeah, it shows na 0 is the ha
whats the problem?
Then show the entire question
this is from a friend and i think theyre asleep
i decided to do it as well for review for finas
finals
I think this works now
i see
,w plot -x/((x+2)^2(x-2)) for -3<x<3
@twin prawn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Particle P travels in a straight line from A to B, the velocity of P at time tS after leaving a is denoted by V ms^-1 where V =0.04t^3 +ct^2 +kt. P takes 5s to travel from A to B and it reaches B with speed 10 ms^-1, the distance AB is 25m
i) Find values of the constants c and k
ii) Show that the acceleration of P is a minimum when t =2.5
I checked the marking scheme and for some reason they omitted a constant of integration when going integrating velocity to obtain displacement
My guess is that since c and k are already constants, c +k + C(constant of integration) is just another another so that's why they omitted it but that logic doesn't really sit right with me and I am very unconfident, could someone please explain why they didn't add a constant of integration?
what is the integral of f(x) from A to B equal to, in general?
general
no, any function in general
Area under the curve?
Idk
ok ok, you know that f(x) represents the derivative of F(x), yes?
if 2x = f(x)
then F(x) = ?
I am used to writing it in a slightly different way 🤷♂️
writing does not matter, it's the idea
?
x^2 +c?
very good
we call F(x) an antiderivative of f(x)
the same way we call f(x) a derivative of F(x)
now question
how do you express the integral of a f(x), from A to B
using F(x)?
integral(A to B)?
yes, integral A to B of a function f(x)
do you know what that equals
in terms of the antiderivative F(x)
we have $\int^{b}_a f(x) dx = F(b) - F(a)$
Jun
are you familiar with this?
great
Upper limit - lower limit
now you may ask me "Jun, where is the constant of integration?????"
easy.
you add a constant of integration to both sides, it simply disappears!
Nah it goes away with definite integration
😨
What
we have $\int^{b}_a f(x) dx = (F(b)+C) - (F(a)+C)$
Jun
I see I see
this why you hear people say "definite integrals means no constant"
its not that it doesnt exist
it DOES exist
but it just cancels out
now back to your problem
were you asked to "Give an antiderivative" or "calculate a definite integral"?
"giving an antiderivative" = there are many solutions, we denote all of them as "+c"
"calculating a definite integral" = using any given antiderivative and substituting the bounds, making the constant cancel out, so we end up with a clear value
i hope that clears out the difference
Right
Is my question one with definite integration tho? Would the bounds be 0 and 5?
And since theres no constant I guess we can just ignore the lower limit 0?
of course!
you have bounds, A and B
that makes it a definite integral
I seeeee, thank you. I will re-solve just give me a moment
@dry pivot Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dry pivot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
dont advertise your server here
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
construct a triangle given two sides are equal to 6cm, 5cm with an enclosed angle of 30 degrees
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
4 6 7
1
Do you know anything about trigonometry?
@real imp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to solve this question? I tried with method of multipliers but still not getting the answer.
@dark widget Has your question been resolved?
@dark widget Has your question been resolved?
why do I feel like this question was typed incorrectly
Where's the PDE
Is PDE partial differential equation?
I have tried this one, and i believe that certainly the question has some error.
Where is $\frac{\partial}{\partial x}$?
YeetusDeletus5
p= del z/del x, q= del z/del y
Amazing context
@dark widget Has your question been resolved?
@dark widget Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
?
looks lowkeyuinely incorrect qn to me
i solved a similar qn and it was x+y instead of x^2 + y^2
Due to the non-linear term on the right, the solution is typically expressed as: Φ(u,v) = 0 Where u and v are the constants of integration C_1 and C_2 obtained from the auxiliary equations....
I dont have much knowledge about this tho
I might be incorrect too
@dark widget Has your question been resolved?
ts unsolvable 😭
tried to do it, it was impossible. ask prof or whoever u got this question from about it
@dark widget Has your question been resolved?
.close
.close
Closed by @tardy mango
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is for part a
Lower bound for second integral is 0?
should be no?
wait which second integral are you referring to here
After the plus
are you saying it shouldnt be 0?
I think it would recount area otherwise, no?
well im also only spreading the slices all up until the red line with the outter integral
thats the goal
<@&286206848099549185>
Ok, so when you set up your inner integrals, you seem to be doing it correctly, but when you do the outer ones you are including an extra variable term when it should just be evaluated from two different points.
The inner integrals take care of the equations while the outer ones just set the bounds essentially
Plus when its an area integral like this the f(x,y) should just be 1, I believe. Im not sure if the problems exactly saying that it should be f(x,y) in the integrand though
yeah true they should be constant
so the inner integral slices the region with slices with respect to one variable which then finds each slice's area
and the outer one is just supposed to sum them up
my issue is that i was treating the outer integral the same as the inner one
yes that sounds right
thinking that because its an integral it must also be summing up rectangles
but turns out that thats not necessarily the case and it just happens so the operation of summing all those slices is a sum that resembles the riemann sum
which can be rewritten as an integral
if im not mistaken
i mean i lowkey dont understand the bounds tho
like i get the intuition visually but not the evaluation
its kind of like a regular integral with its bounds. area integrals are kind of a fancy way of writing normal, single integrals. for example, the inner integral, along with the fact that the f(x,y) term is 1 just creates the function in which youre finding the area, then you integrate across the bounds as you would any single integral
i like to think of it as calculating area between two curves. when you do that, you have to subtract the bottom curve from the top curve. in area integrals if you have a function like x = y^2, you could solve for y and set up a double integral as shown in this image. the bounds of the inner integral would essentially create the difference between those functions, then the outer integral would just be the bounds themselves.
@median sleet Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
can anyone teach me how to solve normal parabola?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do you have a specific question in mind?
I havent even started but my private teacher told me I should start today, but dont know where and how
I have some example exercises tho
show a question you need help with
I mean the question is if someone can teach me from start to finish, or at least show some resources so I can start somewhere
khan academy
people are unlikely to teach you from scratch
but they will guide you along if you put the effort in
they dont have this topic
ideally post specific questions or
note you want explained more clearly
I see
search quadratics
found some videos thank you!
its unfortunately the hardest topic of my finals so mastering this would free up alot of time
if you have more resources please send it
organic chem tutor on yt
@upbeat swan Has your question been resolved?
yes
youtube is great
especially organic chemistry tutor
just watch those videos and do the exercises and come back if you are stuck somewhere
Closed by @upbeat swan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
excuse me
What's confusing
Well you have two identical conditions
yerr
x + y = 1
yes
No
oh..
it's a set of candidates along the line
withtin that square region
y=1-x with 0=<x=<1
for example x=1/2 is also valid
what... so theres like 100000 solutions it just needs to be on the line???
like 0.49 and 0.51
I think you need to parameterize the curve
wurt u mean
No it just means you have the same local minimum along that line
these are only candidates for the absolute minimum
o
Now'd you have to check the boundaries too
yes, since it's asking for the absolute minimum, not where it lies
ahh
also since you have a region your function is constrained on, you need to check the boundary too
x=0, x=1, y=0 and y=1
ok thank u
@echo gazelle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @echo gazelle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a small question about constant speed and constant velocity that I'm hoping someone here can clear up for me.
So if a car is moving at 30km/h North and then after 5 minutes it makes a turn when it makes the turn the velocity is changing but the speed is constant right?
My current definition of constant speed and constant velocity is:
Constant speed = Speed that stays the same during the change of motion, direction is irreveant because its a scalar.
Constant Velocity = Same speed and direction throughout the change in motion.
Please correct me if I have made any mistakes in my statements or observations.
yeah speed= magnitude
velocity = magnitude + direction
Yes, speed is a scalar and velocity is a vector
needs to remain same
constant means pretty much that right?
yeah
That the speed/velocity should stay the same during the motion
Yeah, what you said is correct
Closed by @lavish magnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-23 message
In this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJphJVezld4&list=PLEs_zKbA7sG-GK4Xorc-UWYruQDqVMDYT&index=2 at timestamp 9:00 to calculate the gradient of the displacement time graph he did (5-20)/10-0, I'm confused as to why he did that, I know he used the y2-y1/x2-x1 formula to calculate the gradient but i did the same thing and I got (20-5)/10-0. He gets a negative value as the result and I get a positive value as my result, can someone help me find where I'm making a mistake?
- Lessons on Speed-Time, Velocity-Time, and Acceleration-Time Graphs
https://youtu.be/VsIqzJ0tFHk - Homepage for all Unit-1 Past Paper Discussion
https://youtu.be/Pexar9j9h4c - Homepage for all Unit-1 Lessons
https://youtu.be/mRzGM0GByTU - Homepage for all Unit-2 Lessons
https://youtu.be/QIVXKVzVd4o - Homepage for Unit-2 Past Papers
https:...
make sure the x2,y2 corresponds to the same point on the graph which in this case maybe either of (0,20) or (10,5)
here is the graph in question, im still struggling to see how my values are incorrect
when t=0, notice where the graph actually is
the graph is not the dotted line, if that helps clear the confusion
ohhhh i see it now
when x is 10 y is 20, when x is 0 y is 5
final value of x is 10 which corresponds to the final value of y
i see where i messed up
thanks for ur help
.close
Closed by @lavish magnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
😭
when x is 10, y is 5
shi ts is wrongerer (not a word though but you get the idea)
wait what
ohh
bruh wtf did i just say before 🤦♂️
yeah yeah ur right idk what i was yapping
lol its okay
i got it the other way around
yup
when x is 10 y is 5, when x is 0 y is 20
y2 = 5, x2 is 10, y1 = 20, x1 = 0.
y2-y1/x2-x1 is hence 5-20/10-0 thus gives a negative gradient
okay double checked it this time so i dont look like an idiot
yeah
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there another way rather than considering many cases?
4x <= 5y is almost equivalent to x <= y for such low numbers
there is a very small number of exceptions
Yes I considered that
have you found the exceptions then?
In mind I calculate some numbers will satisfy this condition but some will not. I didn't find then
I'll check tho
Rn am eating
alr, lemme know once youre done
the basic idea is that once you find the exceptions, you can basically solve the question for the relation x <= y (which is much easier) and then deal witha those exceptions separately
<@&268886789983436800>
@graceful lichen Has your question been resolved?
oh well
since youve already written it all out, you could just count it
4x <= 5y
is also true at (5,4) btw
otherwise its true where x <= y
5<4 then how?
yeah, (5,4) is the exception
Yes exception
these should be the ones where 4x <= 5y holds
so you can just count them now and get m
Now n
its even possible to do it without writing it all out btw, if you can identify the exception (5,4), it remains to count the number of pairs where x <= y.
x <= y iff x = y (which is 5) or x < y.
There are 25 total pairs, 20 of which are such that x =/= y. Half of them will be x < y, so there are 10 with x < y.
5 + 10 is 15 x <= y pairs
Now add the exception (5,4) and you get 15 + 1 = 16
but in this case, its only 25 pairs, so you can afford to list it all out
for n, you need to make the relation symmetric
symmetric relations are symmetric around the diagonal
so how many red dots do you need to add to make it symmetric
26 is answer then
not quite
i think you forgot about the (5,4) dot which is already there (its in the relation, because 5*4 <= 4*5)
11 dots?
Yes got it 9
the total is then 25
retrospectively, there was an easier way to solve it
instead of focusing on m and n alone, you could realize that to make R symmetric, you'd need to add all the remaining pairs
and so m + n is just gonna be the total number of pairs in A x A
which is 25
Yes, That will be all elements in A x A. Then Which remaining pairs are you talking about about?
by remaining pairs, i meant all the pairs that arent in R but are inA x A
So we remove those pairs from A xA that are not satisfied by the pairs in R
i mean that m is the pairs that are in R
n is the pairs that you need to add. Which is all the remaining pairs in A x A, which are not yet in R.
Either way, the total is just the pairs in A x A
Yes because R is subset or equal to A x A aswell
So R will contain all elements of AxA
yeah and R surely contains all pairs with x <= y, so youll have to ad all the remaining pairs
after you try to make it symmetric, yes
before that, it only contained 16
Yes symmetric with the given condition 4x<=5y
So we can conclude that our condition is 4x<= 5y(initial), it says n is from A x A and that R to be proved symmetric. For this we can add all the pairs which do not satisfy the initial condition after adding set R is ready to be called symmetric
Therefore 25 elements of A x A
@brave wolf
there are 25 elements of A x A because there are 5 elements in A, so you do 5^2
i think youre confusing a couple of things here
R contains all the pairs (x, y) which satisfy 4x <= 5y (there are 16 of those, but you dont need to know that)
m counts the number of pairs in R (so m = 16)
then n counts all the pairs that we'd need to add to make R symmetric
but since R contains all the pairs with x <= y as a subset, we will need to add all the remaining pairs with x > y to make it symmetric. So to make R symmetric, we'd need to add all of A x A - R (i.e. all the pairs, that arent yet in R)
but then n + m is just |R| + |AxA - R| = |AxA| = 25
and we dont even need to know what |R| itself is
but this approach is a bit complicated, so its also okay if you just list it all out as you did
but i gotta adapt this conceptual method to rise my thinking
ill try to explain it with pics then
thx you
so R is the set of all pairs with 4x <= 5y
notice that a subset of this are the pairs with x <= y, do you understand why?
if we just imagine drawing it (you dont actually have to draw it, just the mental picture suffices), this would be a subset of R
and the size of it would be m
but then to make it symmetric, youd certainly need to add all this. Otherwise it cannot be symmetric
and in total (so m + n), it makes all of the pairs
and how many pairs are there?
5 x 5 = 25
so the answer is 25
Closed by @graceful lichen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone help me with this?
(BC=12√3 also, not 12/3, the translator just sucks)
Try to find all the angles and use trigonometry
Closed by @lofty viper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @rich dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if a function is not differentiable in any of its points does it lack a derivate or does it have a derivate but its domain/the original function's differentiable domain is the empty set?
Well, if the domain is the empty set there is no application of the function, i mean, there are no inputs
Yeah, you could say it has a derivative that isn't valid anywhere, but that's essentially the same as just not having a derivative
id say its more correct to say the derivative doesn’t exist but depending on the context theres no reason to not say the second
it's more useful to say the set of all points at which the function is differentiable is empty
functions on an empty set are not very interesting objects
Closed by @rare haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why can a loan of 10 thousand dollars with 20% interest for 46 months turn into 43 million 887 thousand dollars?
exponential
Is that 20% per month? That's 791% interest per year, which is how we usually express interest.
And yeah, 791% interest can make anything happen
You likely did not mean to use 20% per month
Well, you start with $10,000. Next month you have $12,000. And then you get 20% on this new balance, so + $2,400 = $14,400. And then 20% on 14.4k, and so on. Notice, each month you get interest on the previous interest, not the original amount. Which ends up skyrocketing fast
But yeah, 20% interest per month is ludicrous.
I dont wanna borrow from this mafia
I would be happy to be the owner of such an organization, lending out these loans
Yea drug dealers be like
But how? It’s just 10 grand
And it’s not 43 mil?!!!
I don't understand, did you read my message?
You begin with $10,000. You end up with approx. $43,887,144 after 46 months
,w 10000(1.2)^46
that high a monthly interest works wonders.
now if a bank would offer this interest on FD accounts...
alright, sorry, sidetracking.
Don’t be passive aggressive
so do you still have any further questions?
@pearl field Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @pearl field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone tell me the rules to know if a nubmer can be divided by :
2
3
4
5
9?
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
That's like three wildly different questions within 5 minutes lol
respectively:
- last digit is even
- sum of all digits individually is a multiple of 3
- last two digits is a multiple of 4
- ends in 5 or 0
- sum of all digits individually is a multiple of 9
2: last digit even
3: sum of digits divisible by 3
4: sum of last two digits divisbile by 4
5: last digit 0 or 5
9: sum of digits divisible by 9
also 8
sniped 😔
i need also 8
actually 2 is if the last number is 2, 4, 6, 8 or 0
last three digits divisible by 8.
in general, write (a_0a_1a_2\dots=a_0\cdot 10^0+a_1\cdot 10^1+\dots) then reduce (\bmod D)
ΠαϳαμαΜαμαΛλαμα
but 6?
.close
Closed by @clever tinsel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
pls hint for this problem, topic is pigeonhoe principle
I'm guessing you should look at the number of arrangements of 2x2 squares and then the number of possible arrangements of colours in those squares
theres 81 ways to color a 2x2 square
and 54 2x2 squares in total
so at least 2 of them have the same cooloring but idk how thats useful
I think you can also maybe discuss the relationship between squares as squares share boundaries
hmm, could you elaborate a bit more i don't understand
Look at the strips of 4
Each strip must have at least 2 squares of the same color
yes
Define a strip to be red if it has at least 2 rep squares,... etc
oh
What can you say about the number of red, blue, yellow strips (by pigeonhole)?
oh i see it
There must be at least how many strips of the same color?
Closed by @ancient kernel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
WHO SNIPED MODS
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
. @hazy vault
#help-12 message is this how you link message?
yes I do understand. it was why I was skeptical with the proof in the first place
Ok now can you at least use double integrals?
I can use it personally but the lecturer doesn't want us to use it
Ok
Is there any other method other than double integrals?
I am trying to think of how we can justify the limits
when you use IBP
I mean
but ok wait
we dont know if lim a and lim b exist that's the whole problem
ah yeah it's kinda cooked
then doesn't it depend on F_X(a)? fubini oesn't come across that problem
well you have 0 * oo
I can't think of anything other than F_X(a)-1=-P(X>a) and it's<=E(X^n)/a^n in the discrete case
but that's the discrete case
and we're trying to prove it in the continuous case by using limit
ahh
oops I mean greater or equal in the last inequality
But yeah this should justify it rigorously why it has to go to 0, since we also know IE(X^n) exists
ahh tysm
You should have encountered the squeeze theorem I suppose
Closed by @hazy vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this again about induction?
ye
What have you tried and where are you stuck?
say for example that
the side is of length 2^n
and the other side is 2^n - 1
then we need to prove that 2^n / L is a integer
and that (2^n-1) / L is an integer
Knowing this is induction, have you tested the base case?
okay, in the test case, it perfectly fits one piece in L right?
ye
okay, have you tried the inductive step?
its hard
@spiral saddle Has your question been resolved?
This is what I thinked
You subdivide this in 4, each of the 4 subdivisions has one corner without the piece, you take the corners that are colliding in this 4 subdivisions, and you could introduce a L piece, the unique thing I'm missing is one square
can you make a drawing with a down to earth example
btw, the exercise is tricky, I am spanish,and I don't know if:
"Probar que es posible cubrirlo usando fichas en forma de L"
Refers to, prove that you can to cover the board leaving one edge without a squar, or if it means, that you have to prove you can cover the little square.
I don't know If I'm explaining myself
I'm pretty sure that you cannot cover just a square using Ls without putting one above the other
Let me draw it for a 4x4
I'm still drawing xD
Something like this
The red L is to clarify that is the last L you need
you are spanish?
Yes
the third one
So, for a 4x4 it's possible to fill a board leaving that corner empty
That's what I think of the exercise, I don't think it's possible to fill just one corner with Ls
So I think what is asking is to prove that it's possible to cover a board leaving one corner empty using Ls
yes of course
So that drawing is the main idea,that you can use Ls in the subquadrants, rotate them and use more Ls
help
You already had that idea?
visually is simple but with math is hard
You may already knew that and only ask for the math
correct?
well there must be a pattern somehow
yeah
prove this mathematically is going to be another thing xDD
any ideas?
i mean, as long as we can do it like you did
divide the square into subsquares of 2x2
the solution will always be possible
yes something like this, but with math
well, you divide it into subsquares 2^n to prove it for 2^{n+1}
I'd first try to setup the board mathematically
I mean
I'd say that the board is something like T = { 1,.., 2^n } x {1, ... , 2^n}
and the elements are the "tiles"
are you following_
this is kind of hard tbh😅
With this, the Ls occupies 3 tiles of T, this Ls are disjoint from each other, and the union of the Ls has to be T \ { c } being c the square we don't have
You dont really even need induction
Like, by showing that the "n+1" grid is just a collection of 4 "n" grids.
mb
trinome?
I came to the help but got outplayed :/
oupss, I meaned Ls
It's part of a section they're doing on induction but the issue is that the problems they've chosen to put in there are almost easier to frame with without induction kek
can you help
You've done the base case haven't you?
i got stuck with the base case
3 squares
Can you cover three such squares with a three-piece L?
with am L
ye
So your base case is done..
For the inductive step, you have a 2^(k+1) by 2^(k+1) grid. This gives you four 2^n by 2^n grids. One of the corners is removed from one of those 4 grids, so we can deal with this one with the induction hypothesis.
What about the other three? We would like to place an L somewhere such that what you're left with is three 2^n by 2^n grids with one corner missing.
You can draw it to try things out.
idk how to say it formally
If you don't have an intuitive understanding of how you can do this by drawing it first, then how do you think you'll write something that is formal.
Again formal doesn't mean a syntactic logic proof. It mostly means convincing. Demonstrate that you're able to do this for smaller square. Argue why this process can also be done in the general case.
is like what @plush spruce said, but formally is hard
how?
Argue why this process can also be done in the general case.
is hard
- Why was this specific L chosen in particular as opposed to another L you could have chosen?
- Why does this simplify to 4 smaller cases of 2x2 squares missing a corner?
- How does this relate to 4 smaller cases for a general grid like the one you have to deal with?
- If you have a 2^(n+1) by 2^(n+1) square can you do the same? Is there a "middle" 2x2 square you can place an L in in the same manner?
- Would this also reduce to 4 smaller cases that the induction hypothesis can deal with?
If you answer those questions you'll have your proof.
Now that you zoomed in I'm embarrassed about my artistic habilities xD
- i am not sure
- i am not sure
- because its the same except here we have n = 2
- maybe
- not sure
Then you have to think about it and sketch things until you can answer those questions.
If you're not convinced yourself because someone has done the work for you, how are you meant to write down a proof to convince your professor?
you can prove via induction that any L shape that consist of 3 squares with sides 2^n can be filled with small L triminos
- because otherwise is impossible to make it work
- not sure
- because is the same except we have here n = 2
- if its n = k + 1 we need to do something similar notice that in that case we have one 2x2 square and 3 of 3x2 recrangles, then we can intercake the Ls put them one upside fown obe upside up and fill the entire 3x2 blocks
-unsure
@quiet plume
because otherwise it's impossible to make it work
Alright, but what about choosing this specific L made it so you get 3 other 2x2 squares missing a corner?
If the initial missing corner was different, how would you change the L accordingly for instance?
In the 2^(k+1) by 2^(k+1) grid, do you have a middle 2x2 square? Can you place an L like in the 4x4 case? Does this result in the same thing as in the 4x4 case, namely 3 other smaller squares with a missing corner?
Again answering all those questions with certainty will give you the proof.
i already explained the k + 1 case
You talked about 3 3x2 rectangles.
Draw it again. Try for an 8x8 square.
Try to do the same as in the 4x4 grid.
The goal is to break it up into smaller squares that you know you can deal with using the induction hypothesis.
You don't need to cover the whole 8x8 grid missing a square, but just to see if you can use the same argument as for the 4x4 case.
If so you've got two good examples that seem to generalize to each n, saying that by placing some L, you can reduce the problem to smaller cases. This is exactly what you want to do for induction.
And again, you don't need to cover the whole thing.
The important part is for you to see that you end up with four 4x4 grids, each of which is missing one corner.
And that in general, if you do this with a 2^(n+1) by 2^(n+1) grid, you end up with four 2^n by 2^n grids , each of which is missing one corner.
it's still impressive on it's own, no?
why
Because you're concerned with square grids that have powers of 2 as sides.
The argument you're currently working on doesn't apply to a 5x5 grid because there is no middle 2x2 square.
how to formalize
Well now that you've seen it work for 2 cases, think about the questions I sent above. Why does choosing to place the L in this specific way give 4 smaller grids that all miss a corner?
idk how to explain it you just rotate the grids to form L with the empty spots
@quiet plume
It's again important that you think of those examples not as exhibiting how you can cover the 4x4 or 8x8 grids with Ls explicitly.
They should exhibit that from such a grid, the placement of an L strategically in the middle 2x2 square ensures you get 4 smaller square grids missing a corner.
This is how you prove things using induction.
@spiral saddle Has your question been resolved?
ok
but idk how to describe it with math
@spiral saddle Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @spiral saddle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
im not sure if you have to completely describe it with math alone, im pretty sure it is to get you to do it in that inductive process (start with base case --> assume true for n = k --> show true for n = k+1 --> if true for n = 1, then it is also true for n = 2,3,4 ... )
this is a very nice one its quite well known
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is 2a+ 2a
4a
we get 7x=8 correct?
I don’t understand
You can combine like terms, since we have 2 and 5 times x that is equivalent to 7 times x =7x
Oooo thank u
No problem!
How would you solve this for x from here?
we can divide both sides by 7 to get $x=\frac{8}{7}$
pinkishnova cgt queen
do u have a specific question u are doing? like is it a triangle and if so what kind
Like a alternate extriror angle
Like a two parallel lines inside the lines there are two angles that both equal 65
And there is one big angle
That
Is 180
Is it like this?
No how to solve x
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
don't make helpers draw it for you, please provide your question so its easier to help
to solve for x we need to know what x is representing first
or draw it yourself so we dont have to keep guessing
ok 👍
ok no problem
angles around a point add to 360°, so x is 360-180-65=115°
also, 180° is half a circle
so the other half must also be 180°, meaning 65+x=180
x=180-65=115°
how many degrees is a full circle ?
360
a reflex angle is between 180° and 360°
great
no problem
Bye
bye!
Talk next time
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@hallow agate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
question is : The number 916238457 is an example of a nine digit number which contains each of the digits 1 to 9 exactly once. It also has the property that the digits 1 to 5 occur in their natural order, while the digits 1 to 6 do not. How many such numbers are there?
why cant i do case by case basis where:
- i have 2 together 1 seperate first make sure the 6 is behind the 12345 therefore 5x(7x3C2x6x3P3) because u pick 3 out of 2 and put them into either 7 slots and then u have the final where u can pick the last number in 6 and then u order them
- 789 are altogehet 5x7 x3P3
- 789 are seperate 5x7C3x3P3
altogehter cases is 5040 and the actual answer is
2520
any combinatoric masters that could possibly debug my solution ik there is a faster solution but i couldnt think of it cuz i gaslighted that my solution is correct
Here’s how I think about it
? 1 ? 2 ? 3 ? 4 ? 5
Here’s where the 6 can go
So there’s 5 slots for the 6
After you put the 6 somewhere, there are now 6 numbers, and the next number can go in any of the 7 slots (7 slots because now the numbers can go after 5, but previously 6 couldn’t go after 5)
After this there’s now 7 numbers and 8 slots for the number 8
Similarly again, after this there’s now 8 numbers and 9 slots for the number 9
,calc 578*9
Result:
2520
@merry grove Has your question been resolved?
<@&268886789983436800>
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
please do not open multiple channels with the same question.
I am sorry
Can you open multiple with different questions?
no
Oh
the official stance (as in via #❓how-to-get-help) is no. but if you are not sure just ask the mods.
@misty ice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have completed parts a) and b), but I am unsure of how to approach part c).
From the last two parts, I know that the general solution to the PDE, excluding the boundary conditions (which I frankly do not understand the purpose of for this problem), is u(x, y) = f(y + 4x) + g(x - y).
The PDE can also be factored as (u_x - 4u_y)(u_x + u_y) = 0, from which one can solve the two first order equations separately.
The characteristic curves I found from solving u_x - 4u_y = 0 were of the form 4x + y = C, and the ones I found from solving v_x + v_y = f(y + 4x) were of the form y - x = C.
I suspect that part c) has something to do with these curves, but I cannot see what.
@trail gust Has your question been resolved?
I mean those are initial conditions
Not boundary conditions
Yes you don't need to actually solve for the exact equation using those, but their existence establishes that information is propagating outward from the x-axis as y increases.
Well yhe characteristic curves are gonna be y = x and y = -4x if you plug in those initial conditions
Do you know of d'Alembert's principle?
I do know of it, yes.
I.. am afraid I do not understand how it will help me for part c) though.
Well like
If you pick some arbitrary point (x,y) in the plane, the value of your solution at (x,y) is determined entirely by the initial conditions on the segment of the x-axis between where its charactristics intersect the x-axis.
Then is it the case that the only points on the plane that are affected by a change in value at (0, 0) are the points on the curves that pass through the origin?
Specifically, the ones on the curves 4x + y = 0 and y - x = 0?
I think that depends entirely on what values you change
Hm, I'm afraid I do not follow what you mean.
Well like
I agree if we are talking about u(x,0)
Changing the initial 'velcoity' aka u_y(x,0) would not agree with your statement
Because the function lives inside the integral, so the integral will 'catch' any disturbances at x = 0 as long as 0 falls within those integration bounds
Ah, I see.
Maybe i misinterpreted your question sorry
Well, it is certainly a bit ambiguous.
This is a bit troubling. I think I will skip this part for now, and perhaps come back later on.
Ah understandable
I do not want to spend too much time hashing out something that may not be extremely important anyways, so I will put this on the shelf for now.
Seems fair enough
There is a lot of other review questions I need to get to as well, after all.
In any case, I appreciate your help as always, Lex.
You bring a lot of interesting questions here 
Thank you for your time and effort. It means a lot to me.
Of course! Anytime 💜
In that case, I will close this channel for now.
But expect me to ask plenty more in the coming days, for my exam is next Tuesday.
.close
Closed by @trail gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
And expect me to be there to help you with them :D
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
@upper forge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Hint: for the first equation first exponentiate both sides then spam log(a)+log(b) = log(ab)
Hey this is irrelevant but what's the best ai for maths doubt ??
My guy ?? Sorry for ping but it's urgent @dusky totem
ook lemme try
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
No but AI can be seriously big brain quite a few times
@upper forge Has your question been resolved?
for a learner who cannot verify their output I'd still recommend against it.
.close
Closed by @upper forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please tell me why the following inference rule is logcally sound?
The ansswer sheet is the following:
oh
no Ij ust realized
the logical conclusion can be true, even if the premise is false
F -> T yields true
oh nvm
.close
Closed by @novel iron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hlo i need help
guys
in hcf and lc
lcm
in theri word problems
their
how to know which is hcf and lcm
hcf refers to higest common factor while lcm refers to lowest common multiple
try to look for keywords maybe
