#help-23
1 messages · Page 412 of 1
Consider, these tables were usually tabulated to about the millions in some cases in a time were most people didnt even know how to do basic operations
9k
true
This has to do with the functional definition of logarithms
Such that they are the inverse (aka, undo) exponentiation for the same base
On that note, there are usually some easy values for log base 10
ex.
1000 = 10^3
so log(1000) = 3
You basically dig up the exponent.
hmmmm
For the sake of clarity
log (without writing base) is in 99% of the cases log_10 / base 10
ln is base "e", or euler's number.
WAAAA THAT'S WHY I COULD'NT FIND IT
youll eventually see why this base has its own name
uhhh i dont know about these just now
and log_a is just logarithm base "a"
okay!
ln stands for natural logarithm. Has to do with the fact that the eulers number is a really reocurring constant in math
probably far more important than pi
Well, similar to how "log" undoes 10^n
"ln" undoes e^x
and for the general case
log_a undoes a^x
ion get it
yea yeah
so log_3 ( 27 ) = log_3 ( 3^3 ) = 3
They "undo" exponentiation, since, having 3^n inside a log_3
just equals n
.......
quick sec
uhhhh maybe am just too dumb 😭
,, \log_{\color{blue}3}(27) = \log_{\color{blue}3}({\color{blue}3}^{\color{red}3})
Do you agree with this step?
We are just rewriting 27 into 3^3 aka its prime factors
yes i get it till here
,, \log_{\color{blue}3}(27) = \log_{\tiny\boxed{\color{blue}3}}({\boxed{\color{blue}3}}^{\color{red}3}) = {\color{red}3}
Since the base of the logarithm, and the base of the exponentiation are the same
you re just left with the power 3
yes
What's the question
This can be justified with the core idea of the logarithm making multiplication into addition
ohhhhhhh
nothing, i just wanted to know what logs are..
log_3(3*3*3) = log_3(3) + log_3(3) + log_3(3)```
And when the base is the same as the number you take the logarithm of, you get 1
log_3(3*3*3) = log_3(3) + log_3(3) + log_3(3) = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3```
Ohh
hmmm hmmm yes yes
You get to the same result
i get it
Ya it has somebbasic properties w
how is the result the same ?..
3* 3 * 3 is 9 and uhh this gives 3
,, \log_3(27) = \log_3(3^3) = 3 \
\log_3(27) = \log_3(3^3) = \log_3(3\cdot3\cdot3) = \log_33+\log_33+\log_33 = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3
I meant the previous method
yes yes i saw these in my book
Theres a little bit of a problem tho.
Logarithms cannot operate with negative numbers
huh
why so
If you recall that logarithms are like the "inverse" of exponents
but the power can be negative right ?
there isnt a number n such that 10^n = -1
again, recall that finding n is essentially what logarithms do. But since there isnt an "n" which satisfies this equation, the logarithms of -1 doesnt exist
hmmmm so -1 just doesnt exist on the table
And that is true for all values less or equal than 0
ahhh okay!!
Youll eventually learn that they actually do exist but not in the real numbers :)
as in
we need to solve for x
,, \log_x \frac14 = - 1
Where the base is what youre asked to find
yes
Well, in this case you prob want to use the identity that makes logarithms into exponents.
@scarlet storm Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Heya
Is my answer.
-1 / 1 - e^1+ ln(2) - 1/x
equivalent to any of those answers?
I wanna know if my answer is correct to any of these
You mean $\frac{-1}{1-e^{1+\ln(2)-\frac{1}{x}}}$ ?
aPlatypus
@dreamy kestrel
yes
In this case, yeah it's correct
Really?
You have e^ln(2) = 2
I asked chatgpt it said it was wrong (though chatgpt is sometimes an idiot)
Yea
Closed by @dreamy kestrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont understand the step of taking out the E and how it turns 5.6 into In can someone explain please
ln(e) = 1, so taking the ln of both sides gets rid of the e
ln(e) is saying, e to the what power will give you e?
uh
ln(x) asks the question "to what power do I have to raise e to get x"
so ln(e^something) is something
$$\ln e = 1$$
$$\ln x^y = y\ln x$$
so
$$\ln e^{10r} = 10r \ln e = 10r * 1 = 10r$$
9k
but what operation happened for 5.6 to turn into ln(5.6)
were both sides divided by e?
ln is the natural log, or just a log with the base "e"
the operation of doing ln on both sides
chat gpt took the natural log on both sides
the same way we can go from a=b to a^2=b^2 or sqrt(a)=sqrt(b) we can go from a=b to ln(a)=ln(b)
i dont know what sqrt is
square root
$\sqrt$
Krish
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
9k
it’s just log base e
i dont really understand logarithms either
,tex log rules
Krish
,ask log rules
you gotta have a preamable or smth
bruh

nooo
try ,tex log rules
cant read math
anyways
chat gpt took the natural log on both sides and then used the power rule to eliminate the e on the right side.
because ln e = 1
!noai
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
the image Op started the thread with was a screenshot from chat gpt 

here
ic
blud thinks AI is going to take over the world for 30 more years
but really
AI could be wrong
beh
how long have you been using ai to help you with math for
way too long
why are ducks evil
but again its not like I have another choice I cant read math and I need someone to check answers otherwise I lose grade
they gang rape females
or something like that I forgot already
is it the notation that confuses you
certain ai's are better than others at math. geometry or anything that involves shapes or pictures is probably the worst thing to ask ai. regardless if you ask you should also know how to check if it gives you the right answer.
I dont even know I just cant read math and convert it into text in my head and without text I cannot understand it
I check if it gives the right answer by doing it myself first
WolframAlpha is never wrong, its not an ai it is basically a calculator. i recommend you start using that
when you study what do you do do you just read the responses ai gives you
i wouldn’t get too comfortable with chat gpt btw
I usually go through the videos while doing the quiz
and then check with ai
i also ask it to summarize the modules so I have a list of actual things I have to know
good use mhm
and I also ask it to explain formulas
and stuff like that
I havent had a teacher I actively learnt math from since the 7th grade
I miss pre-pre-pre-algebra
idk i just think it’s bad practice
like
part of learning a topic is also learning how to verify your work
it’s like asking to solve for x in $x+2 = 3$
x = 1
and then you plug 1 back into the original equation to check if you’re correct
9k
back when math class used to be called "math"
well i know that ofc
yeah 😭
yeah but that goes with every math topic you feel me
how about a quadratic
like if you got $(x - 1)(x - 2) = 0$
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
and some guy tells you that $x = 1$ is the only solution
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
i know quadratics its just for me to understand a topic very well I gotta go through a lot of practice questions so it sticks but I dont have the time for that
you can't just blindly plug in $x = 1$ and say that's the only solution
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
quadratic formula gives 2 solutions
sometimes
ya
whats it called the determinant
yeah
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
the holy triangle of death
part of learning quadratics is learning the zero product property
if ab = 0 then either a = 0 or b = 0
so it follows from learning about this that you have to account for both possible cases if a = 0 or b = 0
yeah
i agree so
Im good at quadratics
just not logs I started learning them yesterday

imagine giving $x^2 - 3x + 2 = 0$ and some guy $x = 1$ is the only solution, you trust them because you plugged in while you don't know how to factor
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
but i mean like the reason i say don’t get too comfortable with AI is because as you move on to more advanced topics it just makes trivial mistakes where if you don’t have a certain intuition you may not notice it and it’ll mess up your entire work.
like it makes really, really, really dumb mistakes sometimes
agreed lol
yeah
this goes for all subjects btw
but thats why i learn it first I use ai as a study tool
especially LITERATURE
and as a check
I dont like to use it as answer giver unless im really fucked on time
uni students are really fckd on time every second day :/
one time i told ai i needed to wash my car. i told it the car wash was 1000m away and asked it if i should walk or drive to the car wash
it told me to walk 
it's not like it's dumb
it just thinks that you're broke
💀
i recommend studying the topics in depth and knowing how to check your work
no time
once you understand a topic
then you understand what to expect when you solve a problem
if you know what to expect when u derive a solution
you will know how to verify your work yourself
yeah but i dont trust myself
and I dont trust ai either
so i just do best I can and then force ai to do best it can
Closed by @hoary furnace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!da2a
Asking the actual question right away is more likely to get responses.
Asking "Can I ask...?" or "Does anyone know about...?" doesn't give people enough information to decide whether they can help, and answering can feel like a promise to help with the actual question, which they might find themselves unable to.
Closed by @quiet plume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've been given this problem in Number Theory : Given a finite set P of prime numbers, prove that there exists a strictly positive integer x that can be written in the form a^p+b^p (with a and b strictly positive integers) for all p∈P but that cannot be written in this form for any prime p outside of P. I was able to prove existence but i'm really in lack of ideas to show uniqueness, do you have hints or do you know some tools / theorems which can help ?
@plucky marsh Has your question been resolved?
Study the structure of (Z/q^2Z)* to find residues that q-th power sums cannot hit then use CRT to create an x that lands on a forbidden residue for ever prime
every*
@plucky marsh Has your question been resolved?
@plucky marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Am I on the right track here?
Vortac
moving all of the terms with y to one side would be a good idea
So $5x^2z=5xy+3yz$
Vortac
Then would I divide?
$\frac{5x^2z}{5x+3z}$
Vortac
@faint glade
Don't I need to move y to one side?
$3x = -4$
Minus 4, not +4
(We subtract 4 on both sides)
Adding / subtracting on both sides is what moving really is
Where are you getting the 4 from?
It is an example
ohh
When moving terms, the sign changes
You didn't change the sign of 3yz
So first, $-5xy+3yz=-5x^2z$?
Vortac
then, $y(-5x+3z)=-5x^2z$?
Vortac
Sure
Then I do $\frac{y(-5x+3z)}{(-5x+3z)}=\frac{-5x^2z}{(-5x+3z)}$?
Vortac
Yes
Closed by @faint glade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Also
Probably useful to write restrictions
$x \neq 0, y \neq 0, z \neq 0, 3z - 5x \neq 0 \implies z \neq \frac{5}{3}x$
But no problem 🙂
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey there I was wondering how to solve this Riemann-Stieltjes integration problem, any help would be really appreciated!
We have already shown these two results before which I think are needed for this
The professors solutions are as follows but I really don't understand them:
Let $k_r \coloneq \lfloor \frac{-1}{r}\rfloor$, then $k_r \le \frac{-1}{r}<k_r+1$ i.e. $-\frac{1}{k_r+1} < r \le -\frac{1}{k_r}$, and $\alpha(x) = k$ if $k\le -\frac{1}{x}<k+1$, i.e. $-\frac{1}{k+1} < r \le -\frac{1}{k}$, $\forall k\in\mathbb{Z}$. It follows that:
$\int_{r}^{1}x^pd\alpha=\int_{r}^{-\frac{1}{k_r}}x^pd\alpha + \int_{-\frac{1}{k_r}}^{-\frac{1}{k_r+1}}x^pd\alpha + ... + \int_{\frac{1}{2}}^{1}x^pd\alpha$
By 2, we get that this is equal to
$\sum_{k=1}^{-k_r}\frac{1}{k^p}$, which converges iff $p>1$.
I really dont understand how use used result #2 here (like which value of $s$ did he use).
dan
also how does k_r \le -1/r < k_r + 1 even imply -1/(k_r+1) < r \le -1/k_r shouldn't the inequalities be the other way?
@lone shuttle Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @lone shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is sine used here instead we should be using cos
Both are sinusodial waves
Does it really matter
It's just a 90 degrees phase shift
i can give u the whole problem can u help?
For any possible stsrting point you could just write
[
y = a\sin\8{\4{2\pi}\lambda (vt-x) + \varphi}
]
Maybe
ok first thing i dont get that we are using the sine component still another thing that are notations all fucked here im so confused
Can you explain why not use sine here
Okay?
Like there is no notion of 'vertical' or 'horizontal' when using either of those functions on their own. The equation is just calculating magnitude NOT a particle's motion in space
calculating magnitude either way is calculating some value of x or y so it is calculating the position no???
The x here isnt meant to tell you the particle's current position
Yes but in a relative sense
I am trying to tell you that using either cos or sin does not matter because the difference between them is just a phase shift (cos(theta) = sin(90 - theta))
Phase shifts only result in a horizontal shift, which in time, is equivalent to you recording the function starting from different states (I.e., it achieves its maximum displacement at t = 0, when it could very well be its minimum if you start at a later time)
now i think abt it
y= sin(x) for horizontal displacement is same as y= cos ( x) by now sin(90-x) nono sorry aghhhh
leave it
maybe ill see my teachers
thanks fo rthe help and taking ur time tho
.close
Closed by @humble egret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In a certain lottery 10,000 tickets are sold and ten equal prizes are awarded.
What is the probability of not getting a prize if you buy (a) one ticket (b) two
tickets (c) 10 tickets.
The method I used was 1/1000 is the probability of getting the prize so thats the ans for a, so for b part you have 2/1000, and for c likewise ur having 10/1000. so just 1-P(x) to get the ans
but my book uses combinatorics and says for C part it is 9990C10/10000C10 etc etc and the answer is kinda the same of what i got
but its not EXACT, so i asked chatgpt (im sorry) and it said my ans wouldnt rlly be right?
am i missing something?
P(no prize) = 9990/10000 = 0.999 so thats right
you're assuming that the tickets you bought are 'with replacement'.
saying "2 tickets ⇒ P(prize) = 2/1000" is treating the probability as if it just adds up linearly
remember that after considering your first ticket as a loss, you only have 9999 tickets left to compare against.
and so on.
this is just the expected number of prizes you win, not the probability of winning at least one
which is why u got an ans thats kinda there but not really
just think about it, for 2 tickets, you want the probability that neither of your tickets is among the 10 winning ones. Out of C(10000, 2) equally likely pairs of tickets you could have bought, C(9990, 2) of them consist entirely of losers
so im guessing the book ans was 0.998001
or around there
9980009
yeah
yeah cause P(no prize, 2 tickets) = C(9990,2) / C(10000,2) = (9990·9989)/(10000·9999) = .998001
think about it
if you bought 1000 tickets, your rule would give P(prize) = 1000/1000 = 1, guaranteed. But that's obviously wrong since you could buy 1000 tickets and still have all 10 prizes land on the other 9000
so ur logic breaks down at n=2
you're assuming that there are still 10000 tickets to compare against after your first n tickets.
or as the other person said ur assuming with replacement
aka replacing the ticket back into the pot\
oh i see. still kinda confused but I do get what's happening with the thing im doing.
ty yall
ill just stick to combinatorics for everything 💔
.close
Closed by @distant storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-23 message
oh wait, mind helping me with this one too
Out of 100 students, two sections of 40 and 60 are formed. If you and your friend
are among the 100 students, what is the probability that
(a) you both enter the same section?
(b) you both enter the different sections?
I think I used the same logic of linearity here perhaps, assumed section A and B, P(A)=0.4 and P(B)=0.6, so a) 0.4x0.4+0.6x0.6, and with b) 0.4x0.6x2!
so what is ur issue
Uh the answer is apparently wrong 😭 but I don't get why. Seems pretty basic to me to add the probabilities
the two placements aren't independent cause once you're placed in a section, there's one fewer seat there for your friend
oh oops
P(you in A) = 40/100, and then P(friend in A | you in A) = 39/99 cause there is only 39 seats left in A out of the 99 remaining students
Closed by @distant storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I want plenty pings
<@&268886789983436800>
what?
this does not seem like a math problem
only use help channels for math problems 
.close
Closed by @lilac crane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for number 4, the clue there is that
its a factorial
1, 2, 6, 24, 120
i genuinely dont know where to begin is the problem
i guess theres a + 1 at the tail end of the formula
its a geometric sequence and its initial term is 1
its prolly n! + 1 but idk if im allowed to use that
yes that seems right
oh we're allowed to use ! ?
how else would u describe it
you dont wanna use a product
Maladroit
,w RecurrenceTable[{f[n] == f[n - 1] + 6*3^(n - 1), f[0] == 5}, f[n], {n, 1, 5}]
assume a_0 = 5
hell yeah
tbf you can make the sequence to be anything you want after the ...
wdym
5 11 29 83 1 1 1 1 1 ... is a valid sequence
.close
Closed by @twin prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
11111 ☠️
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is PI -2 for b
Ah yeah right I misread the equation
-2 works indeed
Well the easiest thing here is to search for v=constant, cause your RHS is a constant and v shows up in the LHS
And if you search for such a sol, you'll get v=-2
but how come
How come what
like isnt it like idk how to explain
like if u had 2x^3 on the right hand side
ud do
ax^3+bx^2+cx+d
as ur PI
idk what u do if its a constant
well
nvm i see now
but
yh yh
i get it
thank you tho
<@&268886789983436800> spam
.close
Closed by @fervent pulsar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This below is the probability of the complimentary event, but idk how to compute this
$\prod_{i=1}^{\infty} \left( 1 - \prod_{j=1}^{k} \frac{1}{(ki+j)^\alpha} \right)$
k
well not exactly the complimentary event, but the probability that in each separate block of k trials we get at least one fail
in separate intervals
@primal gazelle Has your question been resolved?
I think they just want you to leave it in product form
yeah computing it looks too difficult
I guess if you want to, you could use the fact that
$\ln(\prod a_i) = \sum \ln(a_i)$ to approximate it
MxRgD
so turning the product into a sum
thats what I was thinking about too, but then it still looks kinda bad and I didnt want to use approximations
okay then imma just focus on other probability stuff this is probably not the point of the exercise anyway
thank you
.close
Closed by @primal gazelle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what have you tried
since it's f(g(x)), try finding when g(x) is less than 0
since f(x) isn't defined for anything above 0
this will find you the domain of the function
plug in f(g(24)) [ignore the restrictions here]
the range will be $(f(g(24)), \infty)$
MarcoMa210
the range is basically where the output reaches
@stiff nest Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me solve for x
67
show what you have tried so far.
idk i js know x is 2017
but i tried it
have u tried taking eeverything to one side?
start by taking all the x's to one side and all the constants to the other side
ye
ok i'll try
@pastel crane Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how am i supposed to figure out whether if they r asking for bernoulli or exact differential question as they hv just given "solve" 😭😭
hmm
You should know by identifying the equation
umm is there like a trick or smthng to it? 🥀
Like the first one is obviouly more of a type of Bernoulli, right
the second one obviously more of a type of an exact differnetial eq
ohhhh yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhh umm can i ask one more doubt tho its regarding a question which i was solving rn but got confused lil
sure
over here in the first one they didnt divide y by anything rather they jsut ignored it but in the 2nd one they didnt rather they divided but whyy
nd in few places after making rhs function of x
the leftover y values in the lhs they took the substitution method nd solved
like which is the correct method then??
So by Bernoulli, you'd substitute t=1/y so I guess they tried to bring everything in the form of (1/y)
but it isn't necessary and division by y doesn't really change the methods
wait isnt both bernoulli?
soo we can ignore the y like we did in first right?
The left photo looks like an exact one
they are also talking about an integrating factor
ohhhhhhhh
btw thenkss for the helpp
(this sub aint for me frfr)
.close
Closed by @crisp swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
!helpers
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
kk
solve it
no. helpers dont solve stuff they guide you
i want quick method
for that type of question
Do you know what the eccentricity of an ellipse is?
yeah
for standard equations b^2 = a^2(1-e^2) if a > b
and change a and b for b > a
You would need to find a and b then, which you can do by writing the equation in the standard form of an ellipse.
oppenheimer saying reiman to solve meth 🥀
Don't be entitled
??
!vol
Helpers are just people volunteering their time to help you. Be polite and patient.
yeah i learned stand equations only
uh huh ,,,,patient
i am not patient
but i am polite
This isn't polite nor patient
well guess its time to learn 😭
Then go pay for a tutor
sir pls tell me any quick method for that pls sir pls ...for this i shall always obligef to you pls sir
already paying mann
Bruh
I don't see money hitting my bank account
Too bad lol
like mentioned above helpers aint getting paid theyre choosing to help
This isn't the place to ask a question that you need to be solved quickly, Ill say that
yk this repels helpers from helping you right, if you're being disrespectful?
so either suck it up and wait for someone to help or go ask ai for a quick wrong answer
ai is jst shit mann
yes i am aware of this
Yes which is why it's probably better to wait a few mins to get help
i have to get the quick method otherwise i am goona cooked in tommorow classrom
The quick method is writing it in standard form.
Which you do by sending everything to one side, expanding (y-4)^2 and completing the square appropriately.
can;t able to complete the square like we got 8/9 y^2
term
You can complete the square.
Just write $\frac{8}{9}y^2 - 8y = \frac{8}{9}\left(y^2-9y\right)$
uh
Azyrashacorki
u have to maintain 1 in rhs tooo
This isn't funny
iam not saying it is funny
Then you should have been more patient and polite
ban me
No one believes this besides you
I can mute or ban if you want?
my english is weak dude
Seems like it would be better for you to quit bickering though and focus on the math.
Closed by @polar lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need a little help with an exercise that in Nielsen and Chuang, its about adjoints. I'm trying to read through Axlers Linear algebra done right but I feel like the notation in Nielsen and Chuang is throwing me off. Here is the exercise, it uses dirac notation so anyone who is familiar with it would be greatly appreciated
I have attached only the definition that I am using which is the same as that in Axlers book
Here is the exercise
here $|w \rangle$ is a vector and $\langle v |$ is the dual.
Luke
What I have done so far is change the $|w \rangle \langle v |$ into a linear operator
Luke
I'm just wondering if there is a way to solve this problem by just using the definiton that is given at the start of the thread I made or do I have to use the fact that every linear operation can be written as a matrix representation and then somehow show that the RHS is true. I stopped working it out when I say "taking the adjoint" because I don't think that with the definition that is given that it is fair to just say that. I know that the adjoint is just the transpose of the complex conjugate but the definition that I am given here doesn't state that.
Does this suffice basically?
Except I'm not convinced by the swapping of indices just by the definition that is given
And that's my problem, if there is someone out there that is more familiar with linear algebra like this then I'd appreciate the help.
Thanks
@heady grove Has your question been resolved?
@heady grove Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with these 3 math problems they are Euler circuits i’ve been out of math because i had to be in the hospital i’m confused on these particular questions because anything i even put it says it’s wrong even if i beleive it’s “DNE”
i understand 0 odd vertices are a euler circuit and also a path and 2 odd vertices is a euler path but not a circcuit
<@&286206848099549185>
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
my bad
0odd vertices → euler circuit
2 odd vertices →euler path only
more than 2 →none........that quite simply is the golden rule
i guess i’m struggling to like formulate it onto the graph?? idk if that makes sense..
like for example question 7 you had to figure out what path that uses one doorway once i did what i thought it was and it wasn’t correct i did a bunch of other ways
idk i’m just confused on that pathway part stuff?
0 odd vertices → there is an eulerian cycle (starting and ending at the same vertex)
2 odd vertices → There is only an euler path (starting at one odd vertex and ending at the other)
more than 2 → here is neither a path nor a cycle
yes i understand that part, just how to apply it to the graphs in the photos above?
to the questions that were asked
sorry if i am confusing n
!
ok np 1 min pls
take your time!
Well actually its not that difficult each room or space represents a vertex and each door is a side connecting two of them... all u have to do is calculate the angle of each vertex then apply the golden rule I told u about n then choose the start n end points
can you send an image representation of that? sorry i am a visual learner
Oh sorry I'm really busy right now maybe later
no worries
Someone else can help you with this
do i @ another helper?
mmm maybe
which one are you working on?
right now the house floor plan one!
yea but like in terms of just vertices {A,B,C,D,E,F} and edges
sorry i don’t understand what you mean like
A has 2 vertices?
do you see like in question 9 here, there are points labelled A,B,C,D,E and they have some lines connecting to each other?
yes
in question 7, we could draw something like that, where each doorway between each room is like a line that connects those two rooms
we call those lines edges in the graph
the ‘points’ are the vertices in the graph
yes i understand that
a path through that uses every edge once in the graph is called an eulerian path
you’ve probably been given a theorem somewhere on when a graph has an eulerian path
pardon me, but doesn't that need to also end at the same point?
i don’t understand. an eulerian cycle does that, but the question doesn’t ask for that as far as i can tell
i thought we were supposed to see what letters you go through and you couldn’t repeat / go over the same one
idk if that makes sense
so lmk
because it’s asking what path it takes
and what letters of the path it is
ohhh okay
and you need to use every doorway once
you can try to just experiment until you find a path
np 
@astral gyro Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
server is being welcomed with lovely servers a lot today...
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im not sure what to do here
i can find the first derivative
Differentiate both sides
yh thats gives 1/1+x^2
Yes
Notice it's a geometric series
So you can say both sides have the same derivative
Now you only need to check if the antiderivatives differ by a constant
i dont get i
So if you differentiate both sides you get a geometric series but you have -x² plugged in
@fringe drift Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have the right angled triangle ABD, inside of which there is AMN.
Then i have the two trapezoids:
MOPN and OBDP.
For which:
Are aligned: A, M, O, B and A, N, P, D
MN // OP // BD
And eveything is right angled on A.
So, AM = AN, AO = AP, AB = AD
Etc.
We know that: AB = 12 and AM = 4sqrt(6)
I need to get the length of MO so that MOPN and OBDP are equal.
So I got the formula:
area MOPN = area OBDP
<=>
(AO×AP)/2 - (AM×AN)/2 = (AB×AD)/2 - (AO×AP)/2
But, from before we know that:
AO = AP = AM + MO
So we get the formula:
AM²+4AM×MO+2MO²=AB²
All fine till here
We define x,y,z such that:
x = MO, y = AM, z = AB
And we put the formula into its quadrstic form:
(-2)x + (-4y)x + (z²-y²)
And then I solve it and find: -2sqrt(30)-4sqrt(6)
Which isn't correct at all.
I don't understand where I made a mistake, I made one but I don't know where.
This is the scheme we had.
I think I overthought a lot during the process.
But I'd really like to know where I made a mistake (or maybe more).
Thank you a lot in advance.
Feel free to ping me for more precisions
I don't even think I need any quadratic formula.
What is the question?
Find the length of the segment MO in order for MOPN and OBDP to be equal.
That was the question asked which I tried to answer.
Do you have an original copy of the question by any chance?
It is exactly as I wrote, I did the translation, the original one is in french

So my questoom woukd be:
Where did I make one or several mistakes?
Where is O located? On MN?
Between M and B as stated
Are aligned: A, M, O, B on one side and on the other: A, N, P, D
Ah i see, the paragraph so long
Yeah, my apologies for that ^^'
I tried to be as precise as I could while giving ecerything I had
this ?
Minλ
My bad i am on bed so the handwriting ugly ☕
@olive atlas my quadratic different from yours
Yeah you multiplied by -1?
Why?
Yours is -2x-4yx+(z^2-y^2)
If you muktiply mine by -1 it gives yours no?
Oh yeah I js made typo
My bad
On ny paper I have written:
(-2)x²+(-4y)x+(z²-y²)
I made typo when I copied it in my paragraph ^^'
I'm very sorry for that ^^'
Yep!
Did you take the negative solution or the positive one?
Then maybe it's the other one?
The negative one 😂
Yes
That may explain it
Aaah damn I was correct but took the wrong answer... 🙃
But I think there is a way to solve thay without quadratic equations because were not supposed to have learnt then yet
Yeah
This is out of the question though
Thank you a lot!!
I'll check the pisitive one when I finish my meal!
I'm glad I found it 😆
I was afraid I overhought too much over this
@olive atlas Has your question been resolved?
Well, I have to calculate the positive answer now.
But yes.
Closed by @olive atlas
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help ?
bruh
JEE advanced 2016 rotational motion problem is one of the most difficult problems in the history of JEE. The problem requires understanding angular momentum and multi-axis rotation. Shashi Bhushan Tiwari (SBT) explains the problem in a easy to understand manner.
0:00 Introduction
1:06 Problem statement
4:47 Angular speed of Centre of Mass
32...
.close
Closed by @drifting spindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to prove gcd(a^n, b^m) = 1 if gcd(a,b) = 1 when a,b,n,m in Z
is there a simpler route?
bezouts maybe
@quiet plume
I wouldn't say it's not simple.
write a = gcd(a,b)*x and b = gcd(a,b)*y with x and y coprime.
how does that work
$a^n = gcd(a,b)^n *x^n$
Lin Xia
Lin Xia
Does this not just say that x=a and y=b or is this the point?
Prime factorization is honestly probably the easiest route
Like, gcd(a,b)=1 means they have no primes in common
Then what possible primes could a^n and b^m have in common?
probably but you have to master it a little bit. But prime factorization is not required.
Yes probably not the better start i agree
I guess, but this method seems like a lot more work for the sake of not writing down p_1 * p_2 * ... * p_k a bunch of times
Sure let's just use prime factorization then
@spiral saddle Has your question been resolved?
@spiral saddle do you know how to do it ?
I do not
if you can help me I would appreciate it
You wrote it down yesterday, it's the same argument
I dont want to use prime factorization tho
is messy and there is better way
trust me
you can do it without the whole factorization
Let p be a prime divisor of gcd(a^n,b^m) what can you say about p ?
If you're sure. But the prime factorization method really is just one more step past what I said up here
You can use Bezout and expand stuff using the binomial theorem, but that is what I would call messy.
suppose d = gcd(a^n, b^m) where d is not 1
then it follows d | a^n => d | a
similarly d | b^m => d | b
d | a^n doesn't imply d | a tho
not true unless d is prime
care to elaborate?
help me
@visual kraken @gaunt elk @quiet plume
@spiral saddle
this is not the same thing
basically if gcd is non 1 then there exists some prime that divides this gcd
yes
so let's take p be such a number
because then the prime factorization is filled with something
p is prime if and only if p|ab implies p|a or p|b.
yeah euclid lemma, what about it?
yes
yeah if p is prime then p | a^n <=> p | a
yes
similarly p | b^m <=> p | b
therefore we get that p | gcd(a,b)
and since gcd(a,b) = 1
we need that p | 1
and there is no prime that divides that shit @gaunt elk
basically we get an absurdity
yes so there is a contradiction
are you in highschool kid?
not really
you are strong for a highschooler
lost
Closed by @spiral saddle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have this problem and part a) has me confused. It would seem that the first equation, b/(B-A), is the one I should use, and b would equal 0. But then I would get 0 for my probability, but not if I have P(X<-1) or something similar, which does not make sense given this is a uniform distribution. Should I be using the third equation instead?
the first equation is wrong

that formula for P(X <= b) is not correct
should be b-A in the numerator
also needs to be piecewise
that's what i thought
ty
which then gives the intuitive answer of P(X<0) here being 1/2, since it's half of a uniform distribution
yes, for any interval symmetric around 0, like [-5,5] is here
does it matter if the probability is asking for X strictly great/less than vs. greater/less than or equal to?
he does not have any of this in our slides
@ebon grove Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ebon grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think I can reduce it to B u C u C' = C u C'. Which is equal to the universe we are working in.
Which means it's not correct? I am not quite sure...
Closed by @copper wraith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a number is purely real if z=z'

