#help-23
1 messages · Page 357 of 1
yea
As the horse runs, the shadow also moves
The question is asking what the speed of that shadow is, the moment the horse ran 1/8 of the circle’s circumference
ye
Which part still isn’t clear to you?
how do i find the speed of the shadow
the more distance the horse travels, the shadow travels much faster
This is calculus right?
yeah
Draw a line from the light source passing through the horse and hitting the fence
uh ye
Draw another line perpendicular to the fence from the light source
The point that hits the fence is the shadow
Since you already know the speed of the horse, you can find the position of that point as a function of time
yea thats what i dont get how to do
Let’s first look at what values in the triangle we already know
we know the speed of horse n the angle made by it
so for the triangle we already have the base and the angle, we can find what we want
Yeah, we have one side, and an angle, so we can make a function for the other side using trig
how do we make the function
Let me draw the diagram
yeah
Which is tan(AOB)*r
uh yea
r isn’t given in the question
So we can assume that the answer would be the same for any value of r
the angle will be pi/4
oh i see
so we put in the values at last ?
The angle is pi/4 at that moment yes, but we’re finding the speed, so we still need ab as a function of time
We can do this by first writing AOB as a function of time then plugging that in
No, that’s still our original equation, we need to find the way to replace 0 with some operation of time
The horse moves 20km/hr that’s 20/2pi*r of the circle per hour
Oh okay
i got what u mean
but then how do we progress further
.close
Closed by @north dragon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to do this
cos420
cosine is \textbf{periodic}; specifically $\cos(x+360\dg) = \cos(x)$ for any $x$
Ann
or to put it in words: cosine repeats itself every 360° (every full turn)
is that the same for sin and tan
yes
though with tan the repetition is actually twice as frequent
tan repeats itself every half-turn
so if they gave me the question with tan i would do same thing as i did with cos but sometimes the answer is postitive and sometime is negative
when do i know which one is which
no, you're overthinking it and also going in like
exactly the wrong direction
the angles 420° and 60° are a full turn apart
therefore their cosines are the same
whats the method do this questions bc i need to do alot of them for hw
is there no specific formula
then what do i do
the angles 420° and 60° are a full turn apart
therefore their cosines are the same
i mean if you mean questions where large angles are given
yh
- try to keep subtracting or adding 360 degrees until you get an angle between 0 and 360\
- if you dont get an angle between 0 and 90 degrees then use required formulae such as\
$sin(x) = sin(180 - x); sin(180+x) = -sin(x)$\
$cos(180-x) = cos(180+x) = -cos(x)$\
$tan(x) = tan(180 + x)$ (that is, subtract 180 degrees from angle once again)
yup
no..
cos of angles between 0 and 90 would always be positive
same goes for sin and tan
so 1/2
yeah
make sure you remember the actual values for the angles between 0 and 90 degrees
it would be given to you
here we change angle by 360 since all basic trig functions repeat 360 degrees
is that the only doubt you have
yh
you could close using .close if youre done
.close
Closed by @lime ocean
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do u do part c? i think i got it wrong somehow
wouldnt g(f) being one to one immediately imply that g is one to one?
and from that you can conclude that f is also one to one
Just assume its not one one and arrive at a contradiction
@verbal vector Has your question been resolved?
no, part (d) very much hints that's it's not the case
the f is onto part is important
think about what could happen if it isn't
if f:A-->B and g:B-->C that means the range of f is equal to the domain of g?
no
all functions would be onto in this case, it wouldn't even make sense to give it a name
i thought B was the range
ok i get it but how do i show part c?
f(a)=f(b) implies a=b
yeah
we're given g(f(a)=g(f(b) implies a=b
indeed
i cant assume g is one to one
do you really need that ?
so i cant assume g(f(a))=g(f(b)) implies f(a)=f(b)
probabaly not
that's not a direction you need
im not sure how else to do it
i guess so
why so?
yeah g is a function so we're good
so we're done with part c now
right?
how exactly are we done ?
[not a trick question, we've just been throwing ideas off the wall, that's not a coherent proof]
but how does this help tho?
well we better involve g°f in the proof, if we're told g°f is one-to-one
from that we have g(f(a))=g(f(b)) implies a=b, what else?
yeah right
we also have f(a)=f(b) implies g(f(a))=g(f(b))
right
we supposed f(a)=f(b). then you apply g to both sides which gives g(f(a))=g(f(b)). and since we're given g(f(a))=g(f(b)) implies a=b
this means f(a)=f(b) implies a=b
this means f is one to one
.close
Closed by @verbal vector
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that P(2n, n) is divisible by 2^n
I can tell I’m on the right track I just don’t know where to go next
Hmm.. do you know how to find power of a prime number in n! ?
Uhh I don’t think so
I don’t know many properties with factorials haha I just know how they work 😂
K
I don’t know if I can do this, but can I factor out the 2 of numerator and then leave it to be 2(k+1)!/(k+1)! ?
nope
no
Ok I figured not
(ab)! isnt equal to a! * b!
Good thing I didn’t do that 😂
from your inductive hypothesis, you have $\frac{(2k)!}{k!} = t \cdot 2^k$, right?
mmmm7
I’m not sure, what is the t? And the denominator looks different
t is some integer
I can't really read
$P(2n,n) = \frac{(2n)!}{(2n - n)!} = \frac{(2n)!}{n!}$
What does it say?
mmmm7
I’m proving P(2n, n) is divisible by 2^n
wdym?
yes if a is divisible by b then a = tb for some integer t
Ok yeah this is right then
yeah so the inductive step requires you to show $\frac{(2k + 2)!}{(k + 1)!}$ is a multiple of $2^{k + 1}$
mmmm7
which is almost trivial
From there, we have that P(k+1) = (2k+2)/(k+1) * (2k+1) * (2k)!/k!
(2k+2)/(k+1) is just 2 because 2(k+1)/(k+1) = 2
So it becomes 2 * (2k+1) * ((2k)!/k!)
But the factorials don’t let me take out the 2 right?
Oh you wrote out the first few factors of the factorial
Yes
It helps a ton
So it can relate to P(2k, k) which we have already proved is a multiple of 2^k
Yeah that makes sense
I’m still reading and understanding the last few lines one second
How come we can do 2*(2k+1) and it doesn’t become 4k+2 if that makes sense
Wouldn’t you need to distribute that before you move it around
No because a * (b * c) is equal to b * (a * c) and that's equal to c * (a * b)
"Associative Property: The way in which numbers are grouped does not change the result"
@bleak notch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @bleak notch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help solving this using matrix math. I am told to do it by finding the matrix Q where each column vector is each eigenvector of A.
this is the work I did so far
But I get a det(Q) = 0?
btw v = <x(t), y(t), z(t)>
the eigenvalues are λ1 = λ3 = -2 and λ2 = 2
@fleet zephyr Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain Eulers method to me. I guess I'm just not understanding what exactly is happening.
Show a resource you're not understanding
I might actually close this
I figured it out
Great
.close
Closed by @solemn anchor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont understand this slide
a random variable is a function that takes as inputs outcomes from a sample space
especially with the X and Y
and outputs numbers
well those are examples of random variables
you take a random event such as "tossing a coin"
consider its sample space S = {H,T}
and now, a random variable X for this event can be any map from S to the real numbers
so X is defined here by X(H) = 1 and X(T) = 0
Im confused from here
it's called a random variable only because it interprets a random event
can you explain what you're confused about?
I got confused with "can be any map from S to the real numbers"
It's not about probability
Imagine we're playing a game of coin toss
And I give you 1$ if you get heads
And 0$ if tails
@hoary seal Has your question been resolved?
no, it's a function that depends on the result of an event
it's an event interpreter if you wanna see it like that
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i tell if a vector field is conservative
by looking at its graph
im unsure of the rules
can someone guide me
@fair goblet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ik thats not math but can someone help
Thank you
@junior bobcat Has your question been resolved?
@junior bobcat Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
proving by induction here, the a shouldn't get a value right? what am i meant to do with it otherwise?
What does "the a shouldn't get a value" even mean
i am unsure of what to do with a in my proof, the a /= 0 and a /= 1 implies a value is assigned to it at some point for the purpose of the proof
do i work with a value of a while proving n and n+1 hold?
Same as you would for 3
so to be clear, if i do the proof with a = 3 is that only for the base case or does the proof for n and n + 1 hold with a = 3?

you're misunderstanding what the base case is
a is an arbitrary real number not equal to 0 or 1
you don't assign it a value
maybe if they wrote for all a in R such that a \neq 0, 1 at the beginning instead of "where a is in R, a \neq 0, 1" it would make more sense
i think that's what i was looking for clarification with, thanks, a stays fixed and i do induction over n, right?
yes
Closed by @merry stag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i think you’re confused
you want to show p has a root
Yeah a bit
whats 1+1
not that p’ has a root
So I should consider a function?
rolles theorem tells us that f’(c) = 0 for some c in the interval so clearly we want f’(x) = p(x) yea?
Yeah
so integrate p
holy fuckin dorks
you’re playing roblox mate
ikr
So let's say
h(x)= integral of p and analyse h
ok math wiz
thanks
zip it up when your done
yes
Let me try
,w 2323/101
Closed by @deep depot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm not sure for b) how the answer is 1 (graph theory)
do you know what the degree of a vertex is
how many edges a vertex has
and how many vertices in this graph have exactly 2 edges going into them?
sure so how many vertices here are only connected to two other vertices
sorry how can I tell
just v1 seems like its connected to v2 and v3, so two edges there?
Closed by @analog arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got 21 but idk if it’s right
can anyone check? pls
show work
that is correct
its messy haha but i can write the solution again neatly
actually — maybe i misunderstand but — in these cases we can just check the work, or should we enforce showing work?
in most cases, its better work is shown if it exists
minor mistakes can be corrected
flawed logic may have been applied to reach the correct value
helper doesn't necessarily have to go through the process of solving it
etc
(nice handwriting)
i see
looks good
++;
i checked the answer on multiple AI but they all gave different answers
AI is unreliable
you also got an answer for us to check for this or you want a hint?
just to check
ok, so what you got?
there are two ways to solve this problem, the intended way and the fast way, which one do you want lol
ok, a small hint would be ||connect EF||
i would love to know the both actually
ah i see
(and see what you can get from there)
@carmine jay Has your question been resolved?
ok so area( tri CDE) / area(CBA)= 1/4…i can’t go further after this lol
idek if that’s helpful
explain — why?
[note for anyone who's noticing — im trying to fix this issue with my gender roles being completely screwed over, disregard it for now; my pronouns are they/them] edit: resolved! hooray
when two triangles are similar with corresponding sides then that ratio is valid so here it will be equal to (CE/CB)^2 which is 1/4 as CB=2CE
and how are they similar? you got a proof for that?
++;
oh yea lmao
then how do we do it chat
i just saw that theorem in my book and applied 😂
whyd you claim them similar if you dont know lol
tbh i’m tired by that q, i tried it for hours last night. i don’t wanna put more brain to it now
i’m dumb
sure — feel free to .close it off
take a rest, have a bit of fun and return to the problem with your head refreshed
that helps a lot more than people think
yep! may i suggest tetris
ok
thanks everyone
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @carmine jay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-23 message
sorry for reopening but i want a solution for this
i wanna move ahead of my homework lol(this is keeping me stuck)
the short solution: since it doesnt actually say anything about where D and G are, we can just move D to the midpoint of AC and G to A, degenerating the problem
under this case, you now can use this logic, and since tri CDE = 1/4 tri ABC, ADEB = (1-1/4) tri ABC, the rest should be easy
thats not very mathematically rigorous
this one I mean
i know (and perhaps i should make it clear that this is math comp logic lol)
you got a nice pair E and F as midpoints, why not use them to form the similar triangles?
i don’t think the degeneration works here.
moving D to the midpoint of AC and G to A actually changes the geometry, because DE ∥ GF must still hold in the original figure, not in a collapsed version. right or am i wrong?
have you heard of the mid point theorem?
you're right — but im applying the trick that, if it works for a general case, it must also work for a specific case, and so we can get the answer off of a specific case
You can just construct a line from B to AC (let's call point M) parallel to DE and show that CBM is similar to CDE, and AGF is similar to ABM (by two angles), with a linear scaling factor of 2
And then you immediately get that white area is 1/4 of the area of ABC
so purple is 3/4
then 60 * 4/3 = 80
Closed by @carmine jay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am up to checking a question where 3 = rootx^2+2x, and the current answers I have for x are -1 +- root 10.
Current working out (for -1 + root10) is:
3 = root(-1+root10)+2(-1root10)
I know this is solvable by a calculator, however, this does not mentally make sense to me. Is there a way to make sense of the question, or is this a question where I use a calculator and not think so much about the question?
making sure, the question is
$$3=\sqrt{x^2+2x}$$
ihave<skissue>
yeeep
okay, and you got $x=-1\pm\sqrt{10}$ for the solution
ye
ihave<skissue>
and what are you asking specifically? you want your answer checked?
Closed by @old root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
22(ii)
what have you tried
you should make certain horizontal fraction lines longer and/or use () to clearly indicate the order of operations
Yes waiy
Thanks
would you be able to simplify something like
$$\frac{p}{\br{\frac qr}}$$
ραμOmeganato5
but you don't have that present,
that identity doesn't really help here
note that you have a common denominator now
combine your fractions
and consider what identities would be applicable to the numerator
what is a^2-b^2
.close
Closed by @teal matrix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me this? I also translated this (it deleted some vector symbols)
Closed by @strange cloud
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can somebody help me with cardan's method of solving cubic plynomials?
yes?
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question!
@midnight salmon Has your question been resolved?
pls explain with this eqn: $2x^3 + 5x^2 + x -2 = 0$
Professor Uchiha
@wary python
have you ever heard of rational root theorem?
whats that
i might have heard about it
but not exactly as "the rational root theorem"
no i have not heard of it
basically a smart way to guess the first root of a polynomial like the one we're solving
The Rational Root Theorem is a rule that gives us a small list of all the possible rational numbers that could be a root (a solution) to a polynomial equation
Think of it as a set of rules for making the most educated guesses
@midnight salmon
ah i see
so i can narrow down the roots of the polynomial
and since its a cubic polynomial
one of my roots HAS to be
a rational root?
Not necessarily
why not
a cubic polynomial does not have to have a rational root
dont irrational and imaginary roots occur in pair
i dont understand
If there is a imaginary or irrational root, then they have to occur in pairs right?
doesnt that mean the cubic polynomial has to have a minimum single rational root?
@wary python
yes, we are guaranteed to have at least one rational root
like this
$2x^3 + 5x^2 + x -2 = 0$
aslx
so defenitely one rational root right?
as coefficients ($2, 5, 1, -2$) that are all rational numbers
aslx
and using the rational theorem we guess the roots?
ok so if we sucessfully guess the roots
cant we just
the rule of conjugate pairs guarantees that at least one of the three roots must be a rational number
you got it right
factor $x-\alpha$ out of the cubic polynomial and then get the other 2 roots?
Professor Uchiha
good ot know
you got it
ah but is this cardan;s method?
related but like i shorten most of the part, if you use the original cardan's method things would be much complicated and long
cardan's method used the cubic formula
while we are currently using factoring
cubic formula? Ig the way it was taught to me was through a series of steps
when all three roots are non-rational, or you just need the exact algebraic solution for any cubic (if the rational fails)
Reduce the cubic equation from$x^3 + lx^2 + mx + n = 0$ to $x^3 + ax + b = 0$
Professor Uchiha
something like this
i was taught in a different way
hmm
from this we take $y = u + v$ then compare the above equation with $y^3 = 3uvy -(v^3 + u^3)$
Professor Uchiha
then we find $u^3 v^3$ and $v^3 + u^3$
Professor Uchiha
then find a quadratic that corresponds to the above roots of $u^3 and v^3$
Professor Uchiha
then solve for u^3 to get some $(\lambda) ^3$
Professor Uchiha
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Professor Uchiha
this was how it was taught to me
yes you can use that but like i perfer to use (RRT + Division) when you do have a rational root
its easier to do
i agree
but what if my dumb ahh cant guess the roots
?
- when i solve the quadratic for the cubic i gave you earlie
r
i get like 2 imaginary roots
whatt he fuck do i do after that
im genuinely confused
should i multiple by omega
or something
im sorry i typed that like i have asthma
Since we proved that our polynomial must have a rational root, you only have to check the 6 numbers on your $\frac{p}{q}$ list ($\pm 1, \pm 2, \pm \frac{1}{2}$). One of them has to work.
aslx
how did you guess thos enumber?
probaly smth wrong
but what if they are of the form $\lambda \omega$
Professor Uchiha
Professor Uchiha
following the rule $\frac{p}{q}$, where $p$ comes from the end of the equation and $q$ comes from the beginning
aslx
you are mixing up the final answer with wrong formula with this one tho
this thread
wdym
The idea of multiplying roots by $\omega$ (omega) is only part of Cardano's method. Those terms ($\lambda, \lambda\omega, \lambda\omega^2$) represent the three final solutions derived from that complex formula
aslx
they are the solutions of u no?
Roots are solutions; you don't multiply solutions to get other solutions. You can't multiply $\lambda\omega$ by anything to magically turn it into the rational root $\lambda$. For our problem, we find the roots by factoring the cubic into three parts: $$(x - a)(x - b)(x - c) = 0$$ Since we are doing the easy method (factoring), $\omega$ is totally irrelevant.
aslx
uhh yes
factoring
but what if i dont know the rational root?
wait
is u^3 supposed to be rational
?
Hey
No, $\mathbf{u^3}$ is not necessarily rational. In Cardano's method, $u^3$ is a root of the auxiliary quadratic equation (the resolvent). Those roots can be irrational or even complex
aslx
hi
okay are we done?
How are you?
ok what to do if complex
im rlly sleepy rn
its okay you are the last case of today
Are you in thailand
lol k
we'll talk somewhere else pls
Alright bye
@wary python
The original cubic equation has three distinct, purely real roots
pretty amazed right?
woah
hows that
possible
well never mind that
how do i solve for u then
i have u^3 = some complex stuff
how do i compute u
can i sleep 😭
i mean one more
Have a good nights sleep
??
in that case you probably have to use trigonometry
cis theta thingy?
alright
thanks for the hint
gn lol
i am also gonna sleep lmao
i mean you can do polar conversion or de moivre's theorem
but yeah
cya
try .close
Closed by @midnight salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i get help understanding how to prove congruency and parallograms
any example q you can show so i get an idea?
yep
something about th e diagn=onal
the diagonals bisect each other
meaning they cut eachother in half at their point of intersection
and now for the 1st q
so have you tried anything else?
or could think of anything else here?
that’s all I’ve done
i see
so these points make a parallelogram right?
and from what you mentioned earlier, the opposites sides are equal
so can i say AD = BC?
you want to prove that opposite sides are equal?
i can’t prove things in general
ic
here consider AEB and CED
for
ic
so a property of the diagonals is that they bisect each other
so here AE = EC and BE = ED
AE isnt equal to BE btw
the point E cuts the diagonals in half
and now here
those 2 sides are equal
we got that
and now for the angle
angle AEB will be equal to angle CEB because they are vertically opposite
so now we got 2 sides and an angle
so with the SAS criteria we can show congruency and prove that AB = CD
didnt understand....
isnt congruency new probably?
ye
they are also congruence criterias
if you find out that all 3 sides of a triangle are equal
then you use the SSS criteria
does sas help prove parallel
oh also how do I or I’ve tht something is perpendicular
no
oh
perpendicular meaning at the meeting of the lines an angle of 90 degrees is formed
if i draw something like this (its very rough rn) it means that the 2 lines are perpendicular to each other
so now can you try attempting this?
first part has nothing to do with GH and FH btw
nor it got anything to do with congruency
if you find out that one pair of sides is equal and parallel then its a parallelogram
as easy as that!
depends on the question
for this one, forget congruency and just observe the diagram
ok
you making progress?
i still don’t get it
so congruency is h=just for congruency right?
yes
so when proving parallelogram I don’t use congruency right?
or do i for some
it purely depends on what info is given to you
you'll have to figure out accordingly, what to apply
of?
when i use congruency
for this question
you can use congruency of triangles in that one btw
isnt 'x' the length of GF
?
might be wrong but from what i see
gf?
yea
i still dk how to work it
dont look at X then
look at the sides of the parallelogram
lemme show this one then
ok
these points make a parallelogram
and its given that line AD = DE
well its split into 2 parts
and acc to the property of a parallelogram, AD = BC
so since AD = DE and AD = BC, DE = BC
and they are parallel too because AE is a singular line
so one pair of equal and parallel sides
hence proved that DECB is a parallelogram!
you got it?
was that too much to take in?
what does this have to do to do with it tho
i understand for making the first parallelogram
your first subq says that you have to prove that DECB is a parallelogram
by seeing the diagram, this was the easiest method to prove it
ok wait, how about AD = DE and AD is parallel to BC
hence DE is parallel to BC
is tht how you do it?
well AD and DE is a single line afterall!
just that the point D is cutting it into half
so them being equal doesnt exactly have to do anything with it being parallel
but since it is a single line
thats why its parallel
huh
what about angle d is equal TO C
yes
now well ignore the point for now
ok
wouldnt the entire line be parallel to BC?
yes
exactly
and thats why DE is also parallel because afterall, it lies on the line AE too
ohh
D is just a point on the line
oh im not but ty lol
what about them being equal
DE and BC?
oh just practice more qs
my exam is tomorrow🥀
AD and DE are equal right?
dang
^ well its given, nothing to prove in that lol
ye
and AD and BC are also equal right?
because its also given that ABCD is a parallelogram
yes
yes
ic
tysm
i got another question
for measurements
uh when two or more diff shapes are added does it only affect the sa
surface area
(going to brush my teeth rq)
no it affects both, the volume and surface area
?
thts what they teach here
then mb
formula
uh
added the volume of the shapes
dirt one is sphere i think
second isa cone
mhm
and same for the surface area
!
they added because the figure is a combination of a cone and a hemisphere
ic
and yk pi
but some of the main formula isn’t there
which?
so which of this they missed?
For sa
They missed the parts w the circle
well nope they didnt miss anything
I have to go
Are u sure
yes because pi * r * l is the formula for lateral surface area
and not the total surface area
sure ig
no dw
the pi * r^2 is coming from the base
and here the hemisphere is covering the base
you cant include that
so they just excluded the pi * r^2 part
so just directly add the rest
midnight 1:30
Dang
Same
So ur like 3hrs ahead of me
lmao
prob
Will u be awake at 5
no 💀
It's 10:03 fo me
Oh ok
Closed by @fickle mantle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
Carlos has two younger brothers.
The sum of their ages is 30, and the product of their ages is 720.
If Carlos is the oldest, how old is Carlos
How can I solve this?
what have you tried so far
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
What if the problem it's in Spanish?
Carlos tiene 2 hermanas más chicas que ella, la suma de las 3 edades es 30 y el producto es 720, cuantos años tiene Carlos?
What equations can you create from there?
I tried linear equations but I couldn't
Tell me the equations.
{a+b+c=23
a(b)(c)=396
why 23 and 396?
Teacher also said that we can use Least common multiple
you said 30 and 720
