#help-23
1 messages · Page 356 of 1
Civil Service Pigeon
the coordinates (x,y) of any point on the graph will satisfy this
and thus gives you an equation in a that you can solve
(also, minor remark: math is case sensitive, so a and A aren't the same thing)
so a doesn't necessarily matter?
what do you mean
what I said above is how you determine the value of a
Ohhhh okay thank you, how do you solve for a
(3,2)
-2= a|4-4|-2
I mean, the point (4, -2) always works no matter what a is?
I was going to have them figure that out and then generalise
Ah I see
but anyway the cat is out of the bag
you need to make sure that the point you pick to compute a
doesn't make the term with a equal to zero
ex. here, a|4-4|=0a, meaning the term with a vanishes
so we can't use this to solve for a
but any other point that doesn't make the a|x-4| will work
so pick another point
okay so (2,-4)
-4=a|2-4|-2
yes
alright I'll let you do that
i got a=-1
ah okay

can you do this yourself now
it's the same thing
just a different "type" of function
yes thanks for your help

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @mighty totem
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m looking back in pay homework and I’m very confused . How was I able to extend the fraction line without multiplying anything
where exactly are you talking about
5,6,7
The second step I took the first one in pencil I would just extend the line and I know this is correct because my teacher checked it but I don’t undestand how it is
Yes
that is multiplying the fractions
$\frac{a}{b} \cdot \frac{c}{d}=\frac{ac}{bd}$ for $b,d \neq 0$
Civil Service Pigeon
aka when multiplying fractions, you can multiply the numerators to get the numerator and same for the denominators
So u can just extend the line?
if you want to use that as a shortcut, then sure
but this is what is happening
Kk ty

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@soft lava Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a question regarding the creation of a formula for a puzzle. Its a game where the only move allowed is a jump, where a piece jumps over another piece horizontally or verdically adjacent to it. the piece must land on an empty space. So to the left, right up or down; jumping diagonally isnt possible. The piece that is jumped over disappears. For example the piece in the bottom right jumps over the piece above it and lands two spaces above its starting space. There is now one fewer piece in the game. A next move would be: the leftmost piece jumps over the buck to the right of it and lands two spaces to the right. At the beginning of the game, a certain number of pieces may be places in the white squares in the 'starting position' after all pieces are placed, they can only jump over each other. the goal is to get as far as possible into the gray area. My question is: How can i create a formula which shows the minimal number of pieces needed to go to each grey row.
yeah i guess, my teacher presented it as the goat jump game or sm
things like this often do not have nice "formulas"
(in fact you cant go arbitrarily far into the gray area, no matter how many pieces you start with)
yeah I know that the 5th row is unachievable, I'm just trying to optimize reaching the 4th row and was wondering if there's an approach that isnt pure trial and error
I dont doubt that such an approach exists, but the way you would discover it is by first doing trial and error a lot until you understand the problem well
which again, is very normal for problems like this
@orchid ibex Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @orchid ibex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me understand how they derived equation 2 here?
if you write d^2y/dx^2 = d/dx(y') and you plug in y' you just get d/dx(dy/dt/dx/dt) where nothing is a function of x
.close
Closed by @compact verge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
solved it
okay..
calculus textbooks are very confusing sometimes imo
is that thomas?
ye
😭
chapter 10
cause i understand that if y=h(x) and h is C^1
then we can use the chain rule
and then from algebra we get dy/dx
and then i was like what we differentiate both sides and nothing was a function of x anymore on the right since we had dy/dt/dx/dt
but if we just apply equation 1 without differentiating anything
then we basically plug in y' instead of y
yeah well it was just chain rule to switch from wrt x to wrt to x
d/dx = d/dt * dt/dx

i noticed that thomas / stewart kind of calculus books are a bit boring and very long with examples and things
im hyped to get to some shorter books that include trickier examples so i dont have to read as much but think more
yeah i guess you're supposed to skim those books
😭
because nobody's wants to work thru 1000 pages
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
tried solving it with the concepts of telescopic series but couldn't solve it.
this one does not telescope
it was kinda stupid i didnt get that lol
Its integration
Ye crazy ass question
can b done by converting infinite sum over 0 to 1 of x^(3n+1) and so on
@polar whale Has your question been resolved?
ye
Closed by @polar whale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
it was kinda long but finally did solve it
crazy fr
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i would like to find the demonstration of this. i've been looking for it on the internet and some books and i dont find it anywhere, does anyone know where can i find it or could do it please?
it mainly comes from the derivation of e^iz=cosz+isinz
e^(-iz)=cos(-z)+isin(-z)
recall some trig rules
cos(-z)=cosz
sin(-z)=-sinz
so, (e^iz+e^(-iz))/2=cosz
we can also get sin by substituting in the cos component for e^iz=cosz+isinz
so, e^iz=(e^iz+e^(-iz))/2+isinz
(e^iz-e^(-iz))/2=isinz
(e^iz-e^(-iz))/2i=sinz
Closed by @half sorrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the answer key says that it is an euler path and not an euler circuit, hence the starting vertex is different from the ending vertex. can someone please tell me why my solution does not work?
Your solution works
The graph only has even vertices so yes it does have an euler circuit
sure, here
so it is incorrect, right?
Those degrees don't match
Closed by @south lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What have you tried?
Okay
all i can really see is the fact 1/(nlnn) goes to 0 as n goes to inf
um i dont think so maybe
just the sum of 1/2+1/3+1/4....
what tests do you have available
theres this result i can use?
but how can i use that to show its divergent cause even if the integral is divergent since the sum will be less than or equal can i say for sure its also divergent
Then int f(x) dx is convergent if and only if sum f(n) is convergent
ahhh
infinity = int f(x) dx <= sum f(n) implies that sum f(n) = infinity aswell
Closed by @spring wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
hii i need help with this (9th grade maths btw)
can someone help me in solving it ?
How i can solve thus
is the answer 4 ?
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
@vague rain Has your question been resolved?
should translate the question if you want help
I need find limit
Is a whole part function
Lim x_>0 x[1/×]
You understand?
you just need ton consider values of x in (0, 1) and x in (-1, 0) separately
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is the theorem called where i can split a double integral up into 2 single integrals multiplied
i cannot find it in my notes
i just need the name
i keep thinking fibonacci but that isnt it lol
fubini
Fubini
is it fubini?

well, its not integrals multiplied
its iterated integrals
you can sometimes pull those apart
yeah like dydx = dxdy
but not always
Closed by @long igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, are these s.s correct
yes everything is right except in step 4-(one should always put modulus after taking a square root) hence here the correction would b to put a modulus arounf sqrt(3)/2
check with various 'theta' for even betr confirmation
Alright thankyouu
Closed by @pulsar notch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to do this
I'm guessing you're meant to calculate the areas
What's the formula for the area of a sector
bro
they dont mean find the literal area bro
How else would you "justify"?
"oh it just looks like grey is more"
"proof by using my eyes"
yeah but
bro
you arent doing area of sector for this question
you have to calculate the sector of blue x 6
and grey x 6
and then see which one has a greater area
...and you do realize you can drop the x6 right
no
...why?
i didnt realize
Just calculate both the area of sector and multiply by 6 and compare
Closed by @real imp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to do equation out of this?
there are multiple ways to do this,
depending on what the question asks for it may be better to approach it differently
did it the question ask for a specific form they wanted the equation in?
@frozen quarry Has your question been resolved?
No, out of pure curiosity
depending on what's given
you'd usually start with
factored form
or vertex form
for a parabola
here there is sufficient info for both, so you could start with either depending on personal preference
@frozen quarry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi gang, so this is basic trig but i dont get whats with the apostrophe at the end of the angle?
the base number is the same as i get on the calc but they changed the decimal and added the apostrophe
DMS
For a math test on quadratics algebra 1
1' = 1/60º
mm
so if i had this same 37.33
one sec
would i multiply the decimal by 1/60
no that cant be right
No, by 60
@slender depot Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @slender depot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @cunning kindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Pls help
Given the sequence 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, determine the sum of the first 10 terms.
I think this is the formula
Sn = An × r - A1/ r -1
the first one just gives the n'th term
the second one gives the sum of the first n terms
and in discord you have to type it like this:
S_n = (a_n * r - a_1)/(r-1)
anyway you have the formula in front of your eyes. so what's the issue?
ChatGPT has given me a result that does not match what I have calculated, and when I show it my calculation, it also tells me that it is correct...
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
HMM GTK TY
I just dont know what to do
the first step is to figure out what each of the parameters are and then the second step is to plug them into the formula
do you know what each piece in the formula stands for
and secondary to that, do you know what the VALUE of each of those things should be in your question
Ifinally understand tysm everyone
@thick sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @thick sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Where did i go wrong?
(I know its nit the most efficient way of solving)
Closed by @regal sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with the second part of the question. is there an easy way to figure it out, without assigning a colour to each vertex manually?
please ping me if responding
Identify cliques
This is a lower bound on the number of colours needed
The maximal size of a clique
sorry, what is a clique?
show your graph
and yes theres actually a direct formula
Full graph
if this is how you're supposed to do it
why is it directed
my bad
instead of names of cities. just put a dot (vertice) and make it undirected
okay, give me a couple of minutes
@south lynx Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
okay so this is the question and the formula for the first question is
TiWiLi=TfWfLf
(i: stands for initial, f: stands for final)
but my question here what is the initial? is it before going thru the first step or is it the first step or is it the step before the last one?
@umbral bobcat Has your question been resolved?
@umbral bobcat Has your question been resolved?
im assuming the initial dimensions of the slab are the ones stated at the beginning of the problem
though given the equation it shouldn;t matter whether you use the ones from the beginning or towards the end since they're all equivalent
you could express the final thickness and width of the slab as t=5cm(0.75)^3 and w=25cm(1.03)^3 and then solve for the length
@umbral bobcat Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone tell me how Im suppose to mathc and match
by js looking at the equation
cause i dont have that mind muscle connection
wondering if some1 can guide pls
ping if u can hep
try holding onle variable to be 0, suppose y=0 and change x around (so we're moving along the x-axis) then see how the vector evolves as you do so
yea
but how am i suppose to know what it like looks liek andstuff cause like
ok look
vector field for x, -y as x should go right when its positive and y should go down when its > 0
right
for the first one
If (x,y) = (1,1), what does (x, -y) equal?
Yes, so at point (1,1), there should be an arrow pointing right and down.
yes
but the other ones are too hard to do
they are being rly weird for no reason
yk what i mean
Your technique is already pretty good, which is observing when it is going up/down and left/right
Let's check number 14 first
Right
No, you shouldn't think about x
You need to think about x-y
x= y
What happens if x-y is positive?
Well the vector is <x, x-y>
If x-y is positive, that means it would go up wouldn't it?
yes
Because x-y here is the vertical part of the vector
Okay, now when or where in the graph is x-y positive?
above y=x
If it's below, the vector will be pointing down
yes
Now, with these clues and this one too
Try to figure out which graph it is
V
@fair goblet Has your question been resolved?
@fair goblet Has your question been resolved?
@fair goblet Has your question been resolved?
,w vector field (y, x-y)
I feel like it should be that tbh
Check to make sure there’s not another one that matches better
Cause my eyes can suck
@fair goblet Has your question been resolved?
Oh wait I just realized this is wrong 
It should be below
That means yeah, it should be V
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @fervent pulsar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-23 message
I think you should cool down and wait for a helper to arrive
yh
you here?
yep
show what youve tried so far
erm
litr alot
im on pc though
so cant take a pic
i jst tried simultaneous equations
in anyway
what thing is the work on
book
Im talking about the work you wrote down where you said you kept running in circles
if you can show all of the work you tried, there is a chance you tried something very good
it doesnt look like you can value how much youve done so far, because you havent said anything more specific about where you are or what you've figured out already
for one, you can use equation 1 and equation 2 to solve for c
you didn't say if you've reached the "I've solved for c" step or not
ok
well
it ried to write c in terms of logs
ive tried to make things equal each other
and then
try make it the same base
and susbistute
in the end
bc=c/log base a c
i had also reached
log base c a= a^c
or log base c b=bc
do you know what the change of base formula is
erm yh
its like
e,g
if i had log base 3 5
and i make it log base 2
it becomes
log base 2 5/ log base 2 3
you can use these log rules for more than just calculating numbers you know
it could make the algebra easier
you could simplify all the logs to use the same base instead of three different bases
it almost sounds like you should show your work
it does in fact end up somewhere
now how am I supposed to tell you why it ended up nowhere?
you dont have to worry
your text is already barely readable
but I can still understand it
it is readable enough
thats the correct quadratic
c must be 1/2
yes
you should solve it and be sure about it
youve now used one aspect of equation 1 and equation 2
you should try out equation 1 on its own and equation 3 on its own next
i get a=2^-b
knowing c = 1/2, its bound to simplify them
b=a^1/2
also correct
b^2=a
but ill solve for b but ill need to make sure
which one is a real solution
cos i jst created another by squaring
if you square both sides, you know the other solution would just be negative
yh
so no, you didnt create another solution by squaring
this is because the next step after this isnt to solve for b
but i jst end up with b^2=1/2^b
yes, the next step after this isnt to solve for b
you now need to consider what the question is asking
with this eq
i need tos ee
whether
if multiple solutions to this
although you cannot cheat, you can still do the next best thing and picture what the general shapes of b^2 and 1/2^b are
keep in mind we have b > 0, so its not the entire graph
thats correct
fortunately that is not counted as cheating
yes
i also have another question
you cannot solve for b unless you have more operators to use
i think this ones harder
alr
this is interesting
heres a question
can you find an example of a straight line with length 1/2?
yep, you can draw the line horizontally
well no nvm thats not true
the center O isnt halfway up the triangle
its 1/3 up the triangle instead whoops
sorry
wdym
not really
How dyk that
(1/2, √(3)/4) looks like this
you are supposed to memorize where the center of an equilateral triangle is at
one way to find it, if you dont remember it, is to draw three lines
each line starts at a corner and ends at a midpoint
if you do that, the center looks more like this
yh
i got that
so
what do u think we do
shld we
graph it
make 3 lines
y=0
y=x
its not y = x
why not
theres an easier way to go about this
first off, you can see the slope of the white line is not 1
a slope of 1 looks like this
also a slope of 1 would mean this is a 45-45-90 triangle
that is not true
there is an easier way to go about this
take a look at this picture
it is clear the six smaller triangles are all congruent 30-60-90 triangles, right
yep
you can see that because the shape is symmetric
so all three of these Ts should have the same angles
and since those Ts are isosceles and have a perpendicular in the middle,
yh
that must apply for all of them
ok now for something harder
pay attention to the center line
yh
be more specific
and the other triangle is at?
it sounds like you havent had all the words fully thought out yet
heres a more enticing picture
thats not an ideal solution
you dont need to
with our first triangle
wdym
is it cos
the height of all triangles
make up one big triangle
so the height of the bottom one aka green line
must be 1/3 of total height
why 1/3?
first off, no
you can see the second triangle doesnt contribute any height to the center line
only the bottom and the top triangle do that
second off,
you need to use that these are all congruent 30-60-90 triangles
you said you only needed one 30-60-90 triangle to solve this
this is correct
look at the 6 segments that eminate from the center
how many different lengths do you see in these segments?
2
lengths that combine other lengths do not count
30-60-90
you dont
30-60-90, what do you remember with 30-60-90?
surely it cant just be the angles
what about the sides? the ratios?
yep
what about sin 30 or cos 60 can tell us that the purple length is 2 x the green length?
cos
u have like
CAH
and SOH
so like
they both match
so like sin30= green/purple
and cos 60 = green/purple
alr, so sin 30 = cos 60 = green/purple = 1/2
purple=2green
there we go
and with that youve seen the ratios
the ratios of a 30-60-90 triangle are 1 : √3 : 2
in other words, the sides are always:
shortest side, √3 * shortest side, 2 * shortest side
in this case you can see we're comparing the shortest and longest side
the ratios tell us the longest side is 2x the shortest side
and with that,
we know that the center must be 1/3 up the triangle
i dont get it
how
did we get this
this is something you are supposed to memorize
for a 30-60-90 triangle,
hypotenuse or purple side = 2 * green side
white side = √3 * green side
you can figure out that this is true, because
green/purple = cos(60) = 1/2
white/green = tan(60) = √3
now with that, the ratios of the sides are 1, √3, 2
often written as 1 : √3 : 2 to represent that theyre in proportion to one another
doubling one side requires that you also double the rest too
2 : 2√3 : 4 for instance
yh
ok with purple = 2 x green,
we know the center is 1/3 of the way up the triangle
instead of 1/2
in general youd memorize this information
a centroid is "1/3" up the triangle
in that if you drew the line from the midpoint to the top, the longer segment from the center is always 2x the shorter segment from the center
yh
ok now with that,
consider this line again
what do you think the length would be now
i tried to find that distance initally
well it should be obvious if you look at the picture the right way
think about how you got the 1/2
if you need a hint, heres a different picture of the same line
youve only looked at the picture for 5 entire seconds
please look at the picture for a more substantial amount of time before giving up
heres a more enticing picture
is it some sort of ratio
yes
you need to be more specific
the vertical spaces between the lines are evenly spaced
rotated?
like
all I did was cut it in half
I didnt rotate it
as in
like
the height we knew
the ratio
was
1:@
1:2
it must be the same
you need to be more specific
that isnt true if you phrase it wrong
shouldnt the number 3 have something to do with this?
its three evenly spaced horizontal lines
the 3 is from 2 + 1
and we need to find the ratio of middle line / bottom line
yh
thats
what i was trynna say
shldnt the spacing between the horizontal lineds
wait nvm
idk what im saying
theres something more interesting here
back when you thought the centroid was halfway up the triangle,
occupied
you figured the length was 1/2
In neat handwriting on paper 😭
and youre saying
you cant just do the same thing but with 3 instead of 2?
its not a midpoint anymore
but its still of 1
can you find the ratio of top horizontal line : bottom line?
that doesnt give us
horizontal distance though
jst the distance
between each individual line
1/3
thats correct
so the top horizontal line is 1/3 the length of the bottom line
you just said that
yh
so the middle horizontal line : bottom horizontal line, what ratio is that
correct
i guessed that
no you didnt
its the literal number between 1/3 and 1
and it cant be 1/3
put it this way
we agreed the lines were equally spaced
now looking at the picture, that equal spacing means more than just vertically
yh
it has to mean horizontally too
yh
if you need to use proof,
consider drawing these lines through the triangle
then count the number of red segments on each horizontal line
1 2 3
the green lines are made to be parallel to the left diagonal
this also works if the triangle isnt equilateral
equally spaced red lines also have equally spaced lengths
if you want a boring general reason, its because you can form similar triangles that can show that the lengths scale like that
@fervent pulsar you here?
@fervent pulsar Has your question been resolved?
I gtg
you have that 2/3 is horizontal and √3/2 is vertical
proving this more rigorously is not easy to expect, if you want to try reading my mind you can refer to this picture
but for now, you just choose whichever of 2/3 or √3/2 is smaller and thats good enough
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i calculate this.
I know theres a rule, where u can splitt them in different prime numbers.
$&\phi(15) = \phi(3) * \phi(5) \
&\phi(77) = \phi(7) * \phi(11)$
Can someone calculate one and explain me what you did.
Imma try to solve the rest on my own.
Also if you know a source for these tasks, id also appreciate it
Darknesslion5|Christian
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
@acoustic zealot Has your question been resolved?
youcan use l’hopital’s rule
Wrong question
This is the question
No the question isnt incorrect it is correct I have written it correctly and also solved now
!nosols btw, on top of answering the wrong OP
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
oh thats my bad im sorry
Still you cant just overwrite my question
What do you mean ?
it's okay, he got his own channel already, and has his channel answered there
Ok
but as a heads-up, do not post your question in an occupied channel next time please.
if you see the channel has a "| {someone's name}" on it, don't ask your question there.
Sorry I was new so I didn't knew
How do i calculate this.
I know theres a rule, where u can splitt them in different prime numbers.
$&\phi(15) = \phi(3) * \phi(5) \
&\phi(77) = \phi(7) * \phi(11)$
Can someone calculate one and explain me what you did.
Imma try to solve the rest on my own.
Also if you know a source for these tasks, id also appreciate it
Darknesslion5|Christian
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
if $n = p_1^{a_1}p_2^{a_2}p_3^{a_3...}$ then\
$\phi(n) = n(1-\frac{1}{p_1})(1-\frac{1}{p_2})(1-\frac{1}{p_3})...$
I have solved your question hope YOU got it ...
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Darknesslion5|Christian
@acoustic zealot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anyone know how to simplify a radical
.reopen
Yes, what's the question?
Radical 67
lol
radical 67 = 67 who believes in harsh change
so sqrt(67) is not simplifiable
Yes that’s the question
$\sqrt{67}=\sqrt{67\cdot 1^2} = 1 \sqrt{67}$
Περσυ
Yes it is
what’s there to do tho

do you need help with anything else for now
sounds fair
close this channel for now then
@wind halo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont understand how to get what the question is asking
i kinda didnt understand it well i think
Draw a circle and a line tangent to the circle
The circle is the path the horse is running on
The line is the fence
There is a light source on the center of the circle
