#help-23
1 messages · Page 308 of 1
Closed by @heavy glade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Stuck on this problem
This is what I tried for what it’s worth
@lean nexus Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lean nexus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone please solve this question, i want to know if i got it right
oh
bruh
for area i got 13500 - 4225pi/2 and perimeter ig ot 330 + 65pi
am i right or wrong
my teacher put 350 +65pi
as the asnwer
and i didnt get that
?
this is correct
bruh what did i do wrong
i did 150 + 90 + 90 + 65pi
and got 350 + 65pi
not 330 + 65pi
i mean the other way around
you didnt do anything with the red part
your equation only added the blue parts
bro what
im so confused
OH
ahhh ok
150-150
150-130 = 20
20/2 = 10 on each side
so 330 + 20 + 65pi
350+ pi
ok i got one more though
correct!
65pi*
this ones only area
i got 42^2pi/6
my teacher got 1470m^2
i got 1764pi/6
what did i do wrong
thanks in advance
i did 60/360 * 42^pi
which is 1/6 * 1764pi
you calculated this blue part
ye
yes
this?
yes
wait meter?
no thats the answer ig ot
its 1470pi
1764pi/6=294pi
1764pi-294pi=1470pi
Closed by @sonic nexus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why does this work
the dxi + dyj
why and how does the dr split into components
i mean i sorta get why and how
but what does it mean really
say graphically
A small displacement dr
It's horizontal component is dx and vertical component is dy
yes but why is it performed in that manner
ive never seen anything actually interact with the dx in an integral
Because the force is also variable in x and y direction
U can always break any displacement vector into 3 mutually perpendicular vectors
ok also why are the vectors distributed that way
like the i and j just drops and the terms in force vector assume the terms respectively for the dr
@junior axle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
any other way to find for how many real values of p and q the equation is valid
You can factor it
Wait yeah they did lol
yea
Lemme think
I got an idea
Divide by q²
so now it's a quad in p/q
And it's D < 0
So no solution other than q=0
You need to factor
@wraith swift Has your question been resolved?


@wraith swift Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I've been going through the Khan Academy math and I've learned that to find a slope it's (y₂ - y₁)/(x₂ - x₁) but here it seems to be backwards. What is the reason for this? The context is seeing if two lines are parallel. Thank you.
By being backwards you mean they calculated (y1 - y2)/(x1 - x2) rather than (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)?
Yes. I think I'm seeing A as the first set and B as the second set so I'm seeing it as 1-7/8-2 . I must be confused
Take either fraction, multiply the numerator and the denominator by -1 and distribute, you will see that both expressions are equal
I see. I think I was just hung up on the initial presentation
Thank you for your help
.close
Closed by @raven lance
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does anyone have wolfram alpha? i just need help determining why my calculation for a 4x4 determinant is wrong. This is the matrix {{8,2,-1,-4},{3,5,-3,11},{0,0,4,0},{2,2,7,-1}}, and my answer is 8 * 4 * 4 * -300 = -38400. website said the correct answer is -600. Im doing the upper triangular matrix method rather than the long version and i feel like the steps that i took is correct. Please see my resulting matrix after the following operations:
1.) R2 = 2(R2) - 3(R4)
2.) R4 = 4(R4) - R1
3.) R4 = 2(R4) - 3(R2)
4.) R4 = 4(R4) - 139(R3)
you're doing operations that modify the determinant
your steps multiply by 2, 4, 2 and 4 respectively
@thick hamlet Has your question been resolved?
hmmm okay, can i clarify this then?
2) R4 ← 4(R4) - R1 this scales the determinant of by 4 right? whereas;
R2 ← 2R2 - 3R4does not scale determinant? why? arent we scaling r2 by 2 so it still affect the det? im confuzzled
both of those change the determinant
so i.e. if we manipulat the value of a row by scaling the row "x" and saving that value to row "x", we change the det?
.close
Closed by @thick hamlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do that
find their slopes and intercepts
Could i just have the answer?
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
Ok how do i find the slopes and exact intercepts?
to find the slope, find two points on the line
then use the formula for it
and the intercept is the y-intercept
read it off the graph
then the equation of the line will be y = mx+c
m is the slope and c is the intercept
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain to me the issue with the factorising method i highlighted in red? bcs it works for some old questions i did previously, but now im just confused
in method 3 and 4 if
x=2 (in method 3) then 2(5+3(2))=22 ≠2
The factoring only work when
something1*something2=0
either s1 is 0 or s2 is 0
ohh i see, so just to clarify, method 3 and 4 can only be used when it = 0?
yep cuz at least should be
x(5+3x)=2
x(5+3x)-2=0 but that doesn’t help us that much
okayyy, tysmm
@ebon plover Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @digital sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, folks. Can u help me to express x via a? P is the centre of face.
M N are centres of ribs
With whole solution please 😭
If you need prettier scheme I would like to remake it
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
could you please redraw it? I can't determine what i'm looking at
Sure. Hope it's better now
hi
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
I suppose you wanna find a basis respectively for span{u_1, u_2} and span{u_3, u_4, u_5}?
yes
What you can do then is check if u_1 and u_2 are linearly independent, the same for u_3, u_4, u_5
oh okkk then what should i do
i mean should i find out the indepency between all of these
or just between u_1 and u_2 and between u_3, u_4, u_5
Well that was my first assumption
you wanna find a basis respectively for span{u_1, u_2} and span{u_3, u_4, u_5} or not?
because there is an and
ok i see
Ok so I think I changed my mind
I think it really wants you to consider
span{u_1, u_2, u_3, u_4, u_5}
See which of these are linearly independent, those should be a basis for the subspace W
this yes
Since it's five 4-dimensional vectors, you can expect at least one vector to be linearly dependent
actually i found out span{u_1, u_2, u_3, u_4, u_5} linearly dependent
yes
what should i do with it
im sorry this question just confused me a lot
can you show what you got
but u4 and u5 dependent
you take these 3 as a basis for W
ohh
there are 3 possibilities for a basis for W
u_1 u_2 u_3
u_1 u_2 u_4
u_1 u_2 u_5
you can choose this possibility
Closed by @worn jewel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im having quite the hard time here
Now don't get me wrong, I see that this is ultra sketchy, but I don't really know why
Now visually, I think I see it? When you start picking point so close to each other, if the function isn't constant then it would eventually be greater than the difference of points square time the constant, but I'm not quite sure how I would do it
@rotund dew Has your question been resolved?
@raven vessel
If i'm being honest, my argument is bullshit I just didn't want to have nothing
(answered in another server)
@rotund dew Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @rotund dew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I get help doing these because I don't understand how to input them
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @devout kindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
algebra aye?
you don't really need to input these anywhere, all the info you need is in the graphs. remember that your domain here will be your possible x values and the range will be your possible y [f(x)] values. for the second row, it's asking along which x values is f(x) increasing, decreasing, or remaining constant. then the last row is just the value of f(x) at the given x. most of those points have been labelled for you, save for f(0) in 29 and 33. since the instructions are cut off, I'm not sure if your teacher wants set or interval notation.
don't forget about your asymptotes!
hopefully that helps if you want to give it a shot and check in if you get stuck lmk :)
also hello, I type too many words sometimes lol
ohh gotcha, so asymptotes are basically a line where the function gets closer and closer to it but never actually reaches that value
let's look at number 33 for example, see how the function gets closer to 0 as x approaches -infinity and positive infinity? (I'm on mobile so formatting is suspect)
it isn't ever actually going to hit zero there, so here you have a horizontal asymptote of f(x)=0
similarly, when x approaches 0 from the left f(x) approaches infinity, and as x approaches 0 from the right f(x) approaches -infinity. the function isn't defined at x=0, so that's a vertical asymptote if that makes sense
and while we're on the subject, since 33 isn't defined at 0, what you'll end up putting for f(0) on that one is DNE (stands for does not exist)
just in case you haven't come across that yet
asymptotes asymptotes asymptotes try saying that 3 times fast😃
lol
oh and the equation for number 33 is -6/x if you want to know. seeing the equation can help some people understand asymptotes a little more you know?
I can't even say it once right 💀
I can't even say it once right 💀
I can't even say it once right 💀
I can't even say it once right 💀
💀💀
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help please
,rotate
what have you tried
or can you explain a bit more why you're saying B
,rotate -90
I meant to send this
,rotate 180
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
3
I see, where you put the derivative it should be 2x+k=3 not 2x+k+x=3
that extra +x shouldn't be in the derivative there
why is that not a product rule if they are both variables
good question
k doesn't depend on x, so when you change x, k stays the same
it's basically a constant with respect to x
yeah that's what I'm getting, looks good
thanks
you're welcome
Closed by @noble bane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yo I'm doing imaginary numbers and i'm stuck on how to simplify a fraction with an imaginary number in the denominator. I understand that i need to multiply both sides by the conjugate but what would happen if i had something like 6 + 5i/-2i?
,, \frac{6 + 5i}{-2i}
cloud
this?
yeah
i dont really know cuz my teacher only taught me to flip the sign of whatever you're adding or subtracting
if it helps you can write it as 0 - 2i
Closed by @rough ledge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
ok so i got it to (6i - 5) / 2 would that just be the simplest form?
when we have a complex number we often want to separate the real and imaginary parts, which in this case you can do by splitting the fraction
and how would I go about doing that
,, \frac{a+b}c = \frac ac + \frac bc
cloud
so 3i + 2.5?
pay attention to the signs
Closed by @rough ledge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
excuse me how do I do part b?
I would guess it’s V=RI
And you already know R and I
27/11R and then the resistance of the parallel part of the circuit?
yes as that’s where the voltmeter is
oh ok
makes sense
would it be. different if the voltmeter was in series instead?
bc voltage is shared?
yes
how so
because the voltage is shared
oh but what would i need to do differently
if theres 2 resistors
do i just divide the voltage i found by 2
you would ratio it between the resistors
ratio?
depending on what their resistances are
if they have the same resistance then yes divide by 2
not a ratio situation
20/60 x 6?
how come
it’s not in series
series is square
this question is more of understand circuits in general
so do you know what the infinite resistance does
i think
the resistance is infinite so it takes the other pathway
with lower resistance
it means the voltmeter is perfect
oh
as no current can flow through the voltmeter
o
as if you imagine V=IR the R is infinite so the I is zero
i dont get the ratios
did they put 60 on top of 80 bc the voltmeter is parallel to the 60ohm resistor
no so
the battery supplies only a certain amount of voltage
all the components has to share that voltage
yea
So it’s V=IR again some components have higher resistances and current is a constant
so if A has a resistance of 5 ohms and B has a resistance of 1 ohm more voltage will go to the 5 ohms because of V=IR
so when you ratio it you divide it by the total reistianxe and multiply it by the resistance of the resistor you want
a voltmeter measures the difference in voltage between two points
so it’s only measuring the voltage split around that 60 ohms
np that was helpful for me too as I forgot most of it
lol r u in uni?
i’m in the british version of college
so the equivalent of specialising in 3 subjects at 17 years old for your country
wat does this mean
no here university and college is two different things
i’ll go to university in 1 year
waddaflip
so high school?
yes A levels
that’s peculiar
so I presume it’s not been helping?
no it sucks
i normally just use chagpt
Oh I actually have that
it has useful notes on momentum tho
somewhere in my garage
yea it sucks
ive used it like 3 times
.vlose
.close
Closed by @brazen parrot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What part do you need help with
Idk how to use a calculator for that
how are you going to use a claculator?
You can do it by finding its derivative rigtht?
Umm it says to do it by using a calculator
,w derivative of ln(x) at x=2
Do u guys think that is right
yeah ofcourse
Omg why does it look like that
In the inage
Inage
Image
liek what?
Delta log over x
its how a discord bot solves it ig
Okii
@indigo tundra Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @indigo tundra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Alex plays a note on his trumpet once every 7 seconds. Bob plays a note on his fiddle once every 5 seconds. Charlie plays a note on his saxophone every 19 seconds. If Bob starts playing 2 seconds after Alex, and Charlie starts playing 1 second after Bob, when will their notes coincide?
is this CRT or something?
<@&286206848099549185> just tell me what the concept here is
CRT kinda just says a solution exists. but there are methods to find the solution too
can i ask, whats CRT?
Chinese remainder theorem
oh
CRT is the theorem that gurantees that this thing has a solution
thanks
if you know a constructive proof for CRT you can use that to find it
based on 7,5,19 being coprime
x%7 = 0
x%5 = 2
x%19 = 3
i think that's the right direction, like it's not 0,3,16
the simplest way is brute force
ok this is pretty simple then
you satisfy them from largest to smallest
all i need to do is to do the vector thing my prof taught me
There are other proofs besides constructive?

so x = 0 (1,0,0) + 2 (0,1,0) + 3 (0,1,1)
oh hey that simplifies nicely
i only really need one set of bezout coefficients
there's a gross "closed form" I guess you could call it, 0*(5*19)^6 + 2*(7*19)^4 + 3*(5*7)^18 mod 7*5*19
so x%7 = 0 but x = 19n+3
3 doesn't work, 22 doesn't, 41, 60, 79, 98
x%5 = 2 but x = 133n + 98
231, 364, 497
,w 0*(519)^6 + 2(719)^4 + 3(57)^18 mod 75*19
ok we agree nice
ok got it friends. it looked like a hard problem at first but then i figured out that you only need one 'bezouting'
idk if any of you guys know the vector method, it's what my prof uses. basically you set it up as a matrix and then do row operations and such
so like you start with the identity matrix on the lhs and the coefficients on the rhs and then row reduce until you arrive at bezout's identity
i don't know exactly how it works but it does
i think that's what i had in mind when i said constructive proof
@still charm Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @still charm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Am I doing problem 23 correct?
yeah look slike it
Closed by @fair goblet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Is this how I do problem 27?
@fair goblet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fair goblet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Would anyone like to work on the Mathcord logic problems sets with me? #events message #events message
👁️
the answer for me is "probably not", but I'll download these anyways to take a look
the answer for me is that ion understand what im even looking at
@sturdy pilot Has your question been resolved?
@sturdy pilot Has your question been resolved?
@sturdy pilot Has your question been resolved?
@sturdy pilot Has your question been resolved?
@sturdy pilot Has your question been resolved?
This is what I have for 2.3, any feedback would be appreciated
Ahhhh I need to fix something
you know, Existentialistic
from what I have observed, it's pretty uncommon to get help with logic in the help channels 
you of all people should know better than to ask here >.<
😭
I was hoping this could act as a thread for people working on the problem set
fixed it
I suspect that everyone working on it wouldn't be in the help channels, for the most part
F

maybe I'll link to this in #foundations
Also I saw you posted a topology question in a help channel earlier
yes but I've actually gotten help with point set here before, and I've seen others get it too
meanwhile, out of the dozen or so logic questions I've ever seen asked in these channels, only 1 or 2 of them ever got answered, and a few days later at that 

I might close this then
.close
Closed by @sturdy pilot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i do this I don’t know how to find Sas or ssa and triangle congruency
For number 9
What does "AAS" and "ASA" mean?
And, you should notice both triangles share two equal angles, which should tell you all you need to know
angle angle side, and angle side angle i think
the side lengths might be very different
For example, here, clearly the sides are of different lengths.
Hint: if I label the two angles a and b, what would the third angle be for each triangle?
@livid bronze Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi sm1 pls help
wats the problem
how is it not right
for vertical i know its just where x has a value that the funtion cannot give an answer
here its just when the denominator is zero
cause u cant divide by zero
oh
so how would i fix it
bc its saying "The graph cannot be drawn. Please correct all mistakes."
you need to set the denominator part to zero and see what x value makes the denominator zero
so 4x+4=0
oh idk how to use the program ur using
ohh okay ty
i get it
maybe move the blue points so it makes a vertical line?
for the horizontal asympotote I actually dont know how to solve for that
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm relearning some euclidean geometry, eventually to take the CSET in california... I'm trying to understand geometric proofs... I just had a few things I wanted to ask and/or clarify.
- It seems like everything (can) start with Euclid's 5 postulates and the definitions of stuff (like points and lines and space). So it seems like there's a bit of a "flow chart" in the sense of Theorems needing to be proven in a certain order to prove other theorems down the line. I'm guessing there's certain conventions about what theorems it's acceptable to take for granted when proving certain other theorems, but in general is it safe to assume that all theorems are fair game to use when asked to prove something in geometry?
- It seems like (I havn't found a counter example yet, but I'm guessing they exist) most if not all of the most popular/useful theorems in geometry are both true for itself and it's converse as well. But it seems like the converse would often need separate proof; the converse would not usually be entailed by a mere proof of the theorem. Is that all fair?
- Continuing from that, is it convention not to use a theorem's converse when proving it? It seems like you'd have just as much justification (arbitrary) taking a theorem's converse for granted in the theorem's proof as you would taking any other theorem for granted for the proof.
I guess I'll stop here for now. Sorry for the unspecific questions, idk if this is acceptable this is my first time posting here 💖
Actually, with regard to #3 I just saw a proof online of corresponding angles theorem which makes use of it's converse (as if best practice might be to prove corresponding angles theorem converse first)
@sullen briar Has your question been resolved?
Others will probably have other answers.
From my point of view at least, 1. is fine. The "process" of mathematics, be it in geometry or any other field of maths, is to distill new truths from known facts (with, at the base of all of it, the axioms). Any theorem you've shown is fair game as this theorem itself is to some extent the result of the axioms.
-
=> and <= can be understood as different statements altogether. As in, if you see some proof that P <=> Q, then this is more or less just logical shorthand for P => Q and Q => P. Both of those need a proof to prove the statement "P <=> Q". I think maybe more "simple" theorems in geometry deal with more barebone concepts like angles and lengths that inherently have some sort of symmetry that allows for things to be true "both ways". (This is very rough intuition, there are probably better reasons.)
-
If you're proving P => Q, and it turns out that you've already shown that Q => P independently of P=>Q, then I suppose you could use Q=>P in your proof, but you have to be sure you're not be circular in your argument.
I don't want to tell you something that isn't true for this, so could just just show me the proof you're talking about for corresponding angles?
sure yeah, ill upload a pic
I'm still curious about conventions, in the sense that if I'm asked on a test to "prove corresponding angles theorem", from what I've seen so far, its the wild west in terms of assuming other theorems are true to prove the one being asked.
So both these i kinda paraphrased from online resources
This proof of coresponding angles makes use of it's converse
In general, there isn't a unique proof for a statement.
I guess the convention is that more elegant proofs are somewhat better but not truer than other proofs of the same statement.
Fair
I imagine that you could acquire a better sense of what theorems are further along the line so to speak
and try to use as few assumptions as possible, but it would be impractical to always derive everything from postulates right
"There isn't a unique proof for a statement" Is that always true? ive never heard that before thats rly interesting
seems for sure true most of the time, but is it always the case?
Ok yeah I think that makes sense.
See you can use the converse, notice how the "<=" direction is only used to prove the "=>" direction.
You can't do both though, because then your proofs depend on each other and that's no good.
right totally
also I find it interesting that the converse relies on yet another theorem, the externla angle inequality
which I then looked up how to prove and it relies on other stuff lol
The reality is that you can always add tautologies (statements that are always true) to a proof without invalidating the proof, so in that specific sense, proofs are never unique. (In other words you could go on "true" tangents in your proof, and while whatever you're saying adds nothing to the proof in terms of getting to the conclusion you want, it's still a different proof.)
So from this it just seems like I'd have already have known this "flow chart" so to speak, to know what theorems should and shouldn't be used for any proof
to avoid being circular without realizing
thanks for your help btw, appreciate it
gotcha
Is this difficulty im trying to describe somewhat unique to geometry or is this a practical concern in other fields as well?
The idea of practically needing to rely on theorems to prove things, simply due to the length of a proof otherwise
Like, ideally we'd prove things from the axioms
It's a concern that arises in any field of maths, since all of them rely on the (more or less) same logic system
fs fs
I don't think this would generally happen, because it's rare a statement will imply a "greater" statement on its own. So realistically, you would not have proven say the external angle inequality using the corresponding angle theorems, so these "lesser" theorems wouldn't go in circles
If that makes snese
no totally, that seems obvious now actually lol
like maybeeee you could get there a slightly different way, but its kinda impossible to go backwards so to speak
i reckon im good for now then, if u wanna close the thread or however that works 😌
Yeah ok!
You can just type .close and it'll close it
Closed by @sullen briar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Guys. For a truth table with two input variables and if the input variables are equal then the value of the output variable are true. Otherwise, false.
Is there a logical expression for this? I felt like conjunction is not enough for a logical expression, right?
Assume the input variables are A and B
i am not saying there is not
i am saying that a conjunction wouldnt be right?
because i cant find the logical expression for it
there's no shorter way than the obvious way
idk what you are saying dude
i just want to know what would be the logical expression for the truth table
afaik it is not A&&B
hello! do you mean in codeing?
no?
(A and B) or (~A and ~B)
whatever it is. coding or not. as long as it is a logical expression
aha that makes more sense. idk why that didnt occur to me
okay thanks!
maybe you can make it shorter tbh
probably, yeah
but im not adept at logical gates so meh, im happy with that for now lol
ok
Closed by @tall ledge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
v is basically something like (a1, a2, ..., an), it's one of those tuples 
sy it's been 72 hours.
im going for the 100h streak
SYREX
GO FUCKING SLEEP
WHAT ARE YOU DOING
IM JK JK
no you're not
I don't believe you 
sy i swear we'll put out a serverwide notice to stop helping you until you sleep
i.e.
v could be an element of R^n, not considered a vector space
wording had me confused 😔
ohhh
R^n is a very specific vsp
ren
oh this
i swear im not doing a 100h awake challenge 
sy this isn't funny
i'm not joking when i say that i am concerned for your well-being
i joke about it but dw 😭 i slept from like 4am to like 2pm my sleep schedule is messed up but i get enough sleep
frankly this isn't the type of question you'd ask
if you were completely sane
so i don't believe you
I wouldn't put it past you to get negative sleep 
im just new to planes and stuff like
english isnt my main langauge
so im a bit lose by wording sometimes
never seen you do that, but ok
yes
i'm actually fairly good at it
informal psychoanalysis ofc
one of my friends didn't talk to me for 3 days because he said it was scary how i could "lay out [his] thought process in front of [him]"
youre suffering from your own success
sleep
you need to sleep better
higher that applies to you also
guys how can i beat the allegation that im not a vampire and that i do sleep
- you are not an vampire
2.You do not sleep
you defo missed some of the chats i had
i say the most random stuff
which is most unlike you
- that doesn't matter
- go to sleep
Can actually verify this
she does 
wk
But if you really aren't sleeping @dense wadi... 
that still does not gives her the permission to stay awake rn
youre also manually breathing now
all of yall?go to sleep
Closed by @frozen marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help solving this question. I am unable to find the points because there so many different ways to put the same equation and so many different answers.
@crystal urchin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im sooo deaddd its asking to find the interval of length at most 10 grams that contains a break-even point for the sales of cheese, where the break-even point is expressed in kilograms, is in the following interval of length at most 10 grams... it says to use the intermediate value theorem but im LOST and dont know how to do it. pleasee help
also for the saleof cheese that will result in the lowest profit i dont know
@calm iris Has your question been resolved?
@calm iris Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove using vectors that the diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other
aint AB = DC not CD
Oh yeah mb just transcription error
Wait but the vector a is still the same tho right?
it’d be -a
Oh ok fixed
since its the opposite way
But same magnitude right?
yeah
Wait so what if I introduced a vector that bisects AB and DC as well as intersects p?
Would that work
@lunar roost Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@lunar roost Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm doing the june23 calc paper 2 question 22 iterations.
I worked out the iterations and got 22. a) right
x2 was 4.10(..) and x3 was 4.177(..)
- b) had me confused though
i did x4 and got 4.23(..) and x5 and got 4.27(..)
so I put x5 (4.27) > 4.25 and lost a mark on that question
mark scheme says it has to be 4.25 < value <= 4.39
why does it have to be like that and why is it 4.39?
@digital crescent Has your question been resolved?
@digital crescent Has your question been resolved?
@digital crescent Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@digital crescent Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I solve 2 b) using geometric series?
why are you using geometric series?
I'm not, I was at a lecture today and the lecturer said it can be easily solved using geometric series. But I solved it like this
Just wanted to understand how I could solve it using geometric series instead, which my lecturer failed to do.
oh I see
he meant this:
actually no, that shouldn't be a geometric series... did he specify which part could be solved using a geometric series?
bad image. but here's how he solved it
so, 2^3 and 2^4 tells us that we need 3-4 iterations
but I have no clue what he did here
oh I see
nope, not really
a geometric series is a series of the form
$\sum_{k=0}^n ax^k$
doaby
doaby
so if you plug in the numbers, you'll get
$\sum_{j = 0}^{k-1} 2^j = 2^k - 1$
doaby
and how is that applicable for my task? sorry, I'm having a hard time thinking right now hehe
Kalle skal slappe af
Good luck Joakim von anka
Thanks my danish broski!
du er velkommen
@steady nest Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @steady nest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i know its in french but question 2/a
prove that for x>=1, f(x)<=1
i feel like its really simple but my brain just cant figure it out
hello!!
alright!
Is x^2 + 1 > x^2
yes
So would that imply (x^2 +1)^1/2 > x
I think I don't need to proceed
yeah thank you so much!!
you too!
Pls .close the channel if you don't have anything else to ask
.close
Closed by @lyric monolith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't know how to solve this further
Hello @rustic whale
helloo
Could you kindly explain
What this is
log 10 2 = 1/b
I'm not too sure what to do with this either, sorry 😭
yess it does, tysm!! I was so confused
And I believe
For the answer
You would have to put log 10 2 as b
Not as 1/b
So either you have noted down the question wrong
Or the answer wrong
Please correct it @rustic whale
the question is correct, so the answer should be, but maybe the book has made a mistake
Answer is wrong then
It's 1/b-1
Not b-1
Anything else i can help you with?
It's alright
Closed by @rustic whale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
8.3.1
could someone just explain what's happening
first question just want s you to find the equation of the curve
Closed by @broken forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do you know how to find the distance between two points?
in this case, the midpoint's x value would be halfway between the sum of the x values of the two points, and its y-value would be halfway between the sum of the y values of the two points.
M_x = (A_x + B_x)/2
M_y = (A_y + B_y)/2
@wide basin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wide basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i joined this course late as i had to visit family back home and i really dont know where to start
bacc (unhelpful)
then I think it should work out applying distributive / De Morgan laws
okay
thats where i was going down
this is what i have so far where do u think i go next
bacc (unhelpful)
okay
,, (\neg s \land \neg q) \lor (s \land \neg r) \lor ( q \lor r )
bacc (unhelpful)
so thats my next step after what ive got
I would now distribute the 2 left
Closed by @wise copper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im having a problem with these 2 probability questions, the 7th question is a continuation of the 6th question. Im guessing the usage of Bayes' theorem could help with the first one if i persume that the whole sample space is worth 1 ( P(S) = 1 ) which would mean that P(S) = P(A) + P(B) + P(C)
The Rule In question
So I would get the P(B)
and then i could do P(D|B) = P(D union B) / P(B)
And since P(D union B) is the same as P(B union D) i would just implement my numbers into the rule
But all of this is still speculation because im not sure if there exists another rule that i should be using
<@&286206848099549185> It has been over 15 min since i've sent my question, can anyone help?
I was guessing that. I tried it and i came up with P(B) = 0.4.
I then took that to the P(D|B) rule and the end total was 0.475 which ive chosen as the third option (C) = 0.47 since its asking from approximation with 2 decimal spaces.
Im now currently facing the problem of the 7th question
oh i didn’t pay attention wait
@unkempt hawk Has your question been resolved?
Any luck ?
5 mins
sorry my writing is chaotic
but it’s none of the choices
if you’re wondering about the P(D) part, since A, B and C are disjoint and happen to cover the entire sample, P(D) is the sum of D’s intersections with A, B and C
you can visualize it easily on the figure
hope this helped
Thank you very much 🙏 (sorry for the late reply)
.close
Closed by @unkempt hawk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I was wondering how this could be simplifyed using surd and index laws
The answer is 3t^2
you can split the product
bacc (unhelpful)
ah okay
you can continue from here?
yeah i think!
ok good
i dont know how to type it on discord but the first part simplifies to 3
how is the second part simplified then?
bacc (unhelpful)
wouldnt it be t^3/6?
6/3
bacc (unhelpful)
thank you!!
np
Closed by @harsh sapphire
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi guys
Ive tried 4, 5 and 6 for this question
I thought the only thing affecting the order would the the order of the polynomial since e^-8 just means 8 is a root
Can you help me out please
@polar kettle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
i need help.
is this sol = 0 ?
how do i make a graph
with this
where would my variable go?
bacc (unhelpful)
but this seems like a contradiction
exactly, did i mess up my procedure?
it's a simple problem to look at
i just don't think this actually has a solution
i just need to make a graph with this (which is the result of the previous one)
this how it would look if you drew it
it being greater than 3 and smaller than 1 doesn't work
like you are having no intersections
yeah, i just have to make a straight, not a graph though
let's have a simple example
