#help-23
1 messages · Page 66 of 1
<@&286206848099549185> its been more than 15 mins
im in desperate need
for help
exam in a fwe days
and i barely understand this topic
If it is proportional to the square of the initial speed
That means
When you double your speed
Your minimum braking distance will quadruple
isn't that what i said here?
ah
Yh you did say that
i misunderstood
my bad
but its asking
wait
so i would choose one point
then quadruple it
?
@humble grove pick a speed
20
Find the minimum braking distance that corresponds to that speed
Then pick a speed that is double the speed you already took
sorry
how do i find this
The graph
yes
Yh
and do the same?
Yh
60x4
OH MY GOD
BRO UR SAVING MY FUCKING LIFE
HOLY SHIT
bro i literally
last quarter
studied
at least 80 hours in 1 week
before the exam
and got a 9/30
Ooof
can u please help me on another question
Sure
wait i did the same thing in the exam
she marked it was wrong
is it bc of the messed up shit that i wrote around it
"Explain why, if the braking force is constant, you would expect theoretically the braking distance to depend on the square of the speed."
no i dont think i did that purposely, i think i just picked 2 random points istg
she circled it
not me
Yh
nicee
If the braking force is constant, the braking distance will depend on the square of the speed because when you double the speed, the minimum braking distance will quadruple?
Do you know your Suvat equations
yes
@humble grove do you know the one that relates acceleration distance and speed
yes
Which is it
Yh that's right
yes
So now just say u² = 0
How much for you to tutor me for 1 hour everyday
or 30 minutes
whatevers food enough to u
physics
i can do physics and maths. Don't ask me about chemistry though
nah i dont take chem
but pls dont charge too much
im still a teen u get me
paying w my own money
lol
@humble grove Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @humble grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can u solve this?
Closed by @tardy mango
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How on earth would one calculate the nth digit of Pi with code? I'm seeing all of these super confusing formulas and Idk what they mean or how to implement them. I'm a programmer not a mathematician ;-;
If that formula works, you can just rewrite this into code
If there is some symbol you don't understand I will explain it
The only thing I don't understand is B_2n
lemme search it...
I don't understand much of it, the context is confusing
And yeah the B_2n I don't get
Are the (1 - something^-n) terms exact, or do you add more of them to increase precision?
It looks like some sort of series to me but idk how it works
It looks kinda like this, but there are only 4 terms, and no dots
So I suppose it's not meant to be infinite product
or it's just wrongly written
What's the source of your formula? I cannot find anything similar
An algorithm which allows digits of a given number to be calculated without requiring the computation of earlier digits. The BBP formula for pi is the best-known such algorithm, but an algorithm also exists for e. Plouffe (2022) gives a particularly simple digit-extraction algorithm for the decimal digits of pi by defining pi_n=((2(-1)^(n+1)(2n...
I need to calculate pi to n base-10 digits
If you just need to calculate pi, you can just do 1-1/3+1/5-1/7+1/9..... and multiply by 4
what's the point of the formula? there are expansions of pi you can just download
That's the Leibniz series
It only converges on pi, you can't trust the results to be precise for any given n
that's what the remainder theorem is for
I have an implementation of it but it takes a crap ton of n to even get a few digits
// Gets the first n digits of pi using the Leibniz formula
fn digits_of_pi(n: u32) -> f64 {
let mut pi = 4.0;
// Start with subtraction for the first term
let mut parity = false;
for i in 0..n {
let term = 4.0 / (i * 2 + 3) as f64;
match parity {
true => pi += term,
false => pi -= term,
}
parity = !parity;
}
pi
}
I've not heard of that
The Chudnovsky algorithm is a fast method for calculating the digits of π, based on Ramanujan’s π formulae. It was published by the Chudnovsky brothers in 1988.It was used in the world record calculations of 2.7 trillion digits of π in December 2009, 10 trillion digits in October 2011, 22.4 trillion digits in November 2016, 31.4 trillion digits ...
B_n is bernoulli number
if your n is less than $10^{10^{12}}$, then just download a file
riemann
It's for an assignment I don't think that my prof would like that
Pi is actually a rational number
I really don't have any idea where to start with this
All I know is that I would need a for loop for the summation
I have a factorial function
So what's the problem
Well what are the first two fractions? What do they represent? It looks like just a ton of arbitrary numbers to me
I am not sure about this, but I think that you compute the infinite sum to some precision, and then you look back
no
they meant all with respect to the world record
Also, I assume q has to do with the precision, but how do I convert an n (as in the nth base-10 digit) to a q
Once you find the infinite sum You use this and compute the fraction on the last line to get pi
S is the infinite sum
Is it correct @plucky elk ? I am not sure if it's how the algorithm is meant to be implemented
lots of different public implementations online
e.g. just on github https://github.com/topics/chudnovsky-algorithm
no and don't interrupt people's help channels
@unique citrus Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @unique citrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im just starting this kind of math can someone help me understand this
$(3x-4y)-(4x-3y)=3x-4y-4x-(-3y)=3x-4y-4x+3y=-x-y$
Duh Hello
?
the only real step here is that the 2nd parenthesis has a - in front of it that you need to distribute, so $$-(4x-3y)=-4x+3y$$
Duh Hello
oh ok
so you get $$3x-4y-4x+3y$$from here you can just subtract the ones which have same variables
Duh Hello
can you see how the answer comes from there?
@jaunty echo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @jaunty echo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain this question?
u know the difference between the 2 given intervals(the "universes")?
a) says for ALL x there EXISTS such y, that x>y
would the correct answer be true, true?
oh so y can only be between 0 and 1
aka the answer is false for both
x too
no
dangit
for (0, 1) i can always pick a y closer to 1 or 0
so that must not be in the universe?
hm? the question in which universe is the given statement true
think im dumb dude
and yeah, in an open interval, u can always find a smaller number, for example 1/n is all in the universe and it gets smaller than any given number from the universe after a while
no, but so that must not be in the universe? made no sense for me here
okay so, (0, 1) is true but [0, 1] is false
@potent bay how about this one tho
on the [0, 1]
@spiral pine Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @spiral pine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I convert an if then statement in discrete math to a representation that uses AND or OR
Yeah, sorry!
If p then q
How do I represent that without the arrow
I know it’s possible but I can’t find any resource on it on google
Thank you
no problem
@idle cave remember to .close
Closed by @idle cave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
sorry i know thisll be a real long explanation and i keep asking questions ksjdksjd, but i have no clue how to do this because the 2nd image is the only thing in our notes and i dont get how they started (like how they knew to divide by x+2) so if someone could walk me thru the steps or even just knows the keywords i could search for something on yt thatd be 
@rose tapir Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i find the horizontal asymptote for x-5/x+4
scroll up
Closed by @inner shoal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just part 2 please
What I have so far
@gleaming juniper Has your question been resolved?
When is that going to be real
when it equals zero?
When what equals 0
the solution 🥹
When the imaginary part equals 0, the whole complex number is real
So you want to find the value of n where isin(n theta) = 0i
There is 75 so just find the lowest value of n for sin(75n) = 0
oop
If you don’t understand why I can try to explain
Oh well I’m English and I’m doing further maths a level so maybe it’s similar
Anyway
Basically when you have a complex number what sets that apart from a real number?
the i
mhm
So with your example of r^n(cos(75n)+isin(75n) you want to make the imaginary component 0
So to do that you can ignore the rest of the question and just focus on isin(75n) = 0i
So then we get sin(75n) = 0
We know that sin = 0 in multiples of 360
So if n can only be a natural number (positive integers >= 1) we need to find the lowest number where 75 and 360 meet in their multiples
You will find that 1800 is the lowest point where that happens
So then do 1800/75 to get 24
You can then check that by doing sin(75 * 24) = 0
So does that make sense?
i get what youre saying, its just ive never seen this bit before
😭
Oh
Just imagine a sin graph
if i could just understand that id say i have it
Oh wait I might have made a mistake
It should be in multiples of 280
180*
Tho k of your sin graph
It touches 0 at every 180 degrees
yes
Which means if you have 75 theta you want that to be equal to a multiple of 180
You with me so far?
Ok so if 75 theta is a multiple of 180 then sin 75 theta is also 0
Now we just need to find the lowest theta that does this
So if you remember back to your primary school days when you did LCM and HCF for the first time
Try doing the LCM of 75 and 180
I don’t blame u if u forgot it lol
Uhh
900
yes
😩
LCM is lowest common multiple
So like for 3 and 4 it’s 13
W
Because multiples of each are
3, 6, 9, 12
4, 8, 12
12 is the first multiple where they are the same
So we are doing the same for 75 and 180
Anyway
ahhhh
i seeeeee
Do u have the answers so we can check if it’s right?
i dont 
Np
Closed by @gleaming juniper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im trying to find the derivitive of this using natural logs rules
But I dont know what Im doing wrong
What other way?
I think that when you differentiate ln of something, it gives you 1/that something and then times that by the derivitive of the something
Well d/dx ln(f(x)) is what
f'(x)/f(x)
Ok I’m just not awake enough today
That's ok
It doesn’t look wrong
Have you tried simplifying it further
Like cancelling out the 2’s
I can get this
But photomath and mathway give me really different answers and they dont look like theyre the same
Is that when you distribute the outside to the insides
ab-ac ≠ b-c
?
Factorise first
How do I do that
Factorise the thing you drew red over
What does that mean
I dont know the ba ac thing but
I see that theres some things in both fractions that look similar
If i multiple e^x by itself does it give me e^x^2? Like the x is squared?
I understand the a b c breakdown now
But how do you even come up with the thing on the middle of the page
Also in what you wrote you have two things in the denominator but mine has three
This is confusing
I squared it
Oh ok
So first thing I'd do is combine the two fractions
Cause they have the same denominator
And then I would pull out a common factor
@frozen harbor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yep
but then i get a decimal
I don't think that's right
I'm pretty sure it's opposite angles are equal to each other
That's not a circle?
Yea but I thought it was in one
so was i right?
Sure
damn
In that case, sum of angles equals 180, so angle y + angle x = 180
what abt this one?
Opposite sides are equal
What?
.
Closed by @edgy cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi can someone tell me if my approach makes sense?
@opaque sorrel Has your question been resolved?
@opaque sorrel Has your question been resolved?
@opaque sorrel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what have you tried?
plugging in
and you got infinity over infinity after you distributed?
dont know
$\lim_{x\to\infty}\f{x^3}9*\f{10}x$
monikanicity
the answer would just be infinity
cause the top power is higher than the bottom power
distribute?
ok what now
i got 10x^3/9x -10x^3/9(sinx10/x)
right
yeah
when u plug in inf dont u get 0
like the limit for that part
the sin part
because 10/inf is just 0
right
so is this answer just infinity?
Ah damn does this become infinity minus infinity
I should have thought about that, that's indeterminant
why inf minus inf
if sin 10/x is mult by the other part
and sin 10/x kinda reduces to 0
x^2/9 - x^3sin(10/x)/9
oh you have infinity*0 on the right then
ah I messed this up
yeah
it's indeterminant whenever the two parts aren't working in the same direction
0*infinity, one is small and one is big
infinity - infinity one is positive and one is negative
you don't know which one is more important
we'd need to get it in the right form first
This one is really cruel
I don't suppose you'd know the Taylor series for sin(x)?
no
This isn't a hw problem surely, right?
sure is
its like the final boss
breezed through the others
then i reached this monstrosity
well you could write it as x^3 / everything else and apply L'hopitals 3 times in a row
as in x^3/ (9 * (10/x-sin(10/x))^-1)
would take a long time
howd we get there
without a calculator
You can rewrite x*y as x/(y^-1)
I.e. don't just plug a large x into a calculator?
it seems like to do this without great pain you would need to know Taylor series
bruh
limit as x->∞ of (x-sin(x))/x^3
maybe solving this would help somehow
though it's not lhopital-able
yeah you'd use this expansion. The first term cancels with something else, the second one becomes relevant, and all the rest are too small to matter
this is unbelievable
I think my lhopital method might not work anyways so
lets say the /9 didnt exist from the original problem
a simpler way to solve (1-cos(x))/x^2
if I have a way to solve that without Taylor series I can work from it
this /9
ye makes sense
if i could solve the problem then
would i be able to divide the answer by 9
and get the answer
yes
since lim cf(x) = c*lim f(x)
If you want to simplify the starting problem to the same thing I'm working on now
This is a bit absurd
im trying the x^3 approach that 9 looks intimidating
But you can apply a substitution like u = 10/x
@lean otterow help 
shoot
@toxic stratus
sorry random person for the ping
nani
best I can do is u=10/x followed by 1 application of L'hopitals which gets you to something like this which I believe has some kind of squeeze theorem solution
is there better?
and when I say "some kind of squeeze theorem" solution I mean pretty sure I vaguely remember this as a Mr Ou problem 
wait putting the x^3/9 on the bottom is allowed right?
/(9x^-3)
i just saw a rule about that but i dont see how that helps anything
like that it would be
yeah sadly it doesn't eventually become a constant if you keep deriving it
yeah gg
@dreamy mirage Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dreamy mirage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone tell me how to derrange 5 letters in such a way that first one occupies the 5th position
.close
Closed by @hallow surge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@zinc vale Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@zinc vale Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@zinc vale Has your question been resolved?
@zinc vale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
would it just be X squared -5 squared
no
can you explain how to do it pls
you have to use the (a-b)^2 identity
(a-b)²= a²- 2ab+b²?
yup
just plug in x= a and 5 = b
(a-b)^2= a^2 -2ab + b^2
(x-5)^2 = x^2 - 2 * x * 5 + 5^2
x^2 -10x + 25
I’m a bit lost
(a-b)²= (a-b) * (a-b)
where do you get -2ab from
oh so you do -ab but since it’s squared you do it twice?
so is this right? this is the next question
Yes that's right!
so surely almost every answer is the same just the signs is different?
Yep if there is a +, then it's "+2ab". If it's a -, then it's "-2ab"
Closed by @atomic totem
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm so confused, a calculator is telling me that the antiderivative of :e^x-3x^2+sin (x) is e^x-x^3-cos(x)+c...
I thought it would be e^x-3x^3/3-cos(x)+c..
and what is 3/3 ?
Wow this is embarassing
happens
@leaden scaffold Has your question been resolved?
One quick question, why would this be the answer to this:
Why would 4sin(2x) turn into -2cos(2x)?
try differentiating -2cos(2x)
How would I know intuitively though with 4sin(2x)?
I know the antiderivative of sin is cos, but Idk how we get -2 and (2x) from 4 and (2x)
well first, the antiderivative of sin is -cos
so that takes care of the minus
and like you hopefully noticed, when you differentiate -cos(2x), you have to multiply it by 2 from the chain rule
so if you are integrating you have to do the reverse and divide by 2
so you get 4-cos(2x) because the antiderivative of sin is -cos, then divide by 2 because you have to multiply it by 2, and get 2-cos(2x)?
please dont write the numbers and the minus in that order without brackets
but yes that's the idea
Why would this not be (sin^3/3)-sin(x)?
This is for calculating anti derivative btw
@leaden scaffold Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
The answer to this is (sin^3/3)+C but not sin^3/3-sin(x)+C, why is that so?
@leaden scaffold Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @leaden scaffold
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
am i right with D**
okayy thank you i alr solved it i jus wanted to make sure
i forgot to write this before 😭
Yup
yuh
kk
wish i could give medals on here
am i right wit D here
@shadow sparrow are you still here?
o ya
uhhhhhhh
i think so
i dont wnana do the math but B is definitely taller
and definitely not by more than 60 ft so must be D
okay yea
am i right with A?
@shadow sparrow im srry i dont want to bother you but what abt this one 😭 am i right with A?
.close
Closed by @plucky elk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello can anyone verify if I am correct the wording is tricky
you need to → both ways to express "only if"
Both ways means it goes both directions
1 "I'll see you at dinner if i have time"
2 "I have time if i see you at dinner"
Oh ok you can say 2 since it says only if
or you can like, "(q & r) or (~q & ~r)"
so the one directional arrow changed to a both bi would be correct?
I don't think so
It doesn't say "only if" at the raining part
So there's a chance i am seeing you at dinner but it isn't raining
right, i got confused
i thought if and only if was <->
I don't know the notation
Does "a -> b" mean "if a, then b" or the other way
yes
yeah a->b would mean if a then b
pretty certain it means if a then b
Closed by @white basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thx
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Minus 2?
Show your work
basicly i have u' = 2x and v' = 2
so its
2x * 2x - 3x^2 - 1 * 2 / 2x^2
like this
and then this
and this is my solution
Umm
Sooshon
you forgot to square the coefficient in the bottom, that maybe cancels out with the one in the numerator? Haven't checked your whole solution but that's first thing i caught
$\frac{(2x*2x)-(x^2 +1)*2}{4x^2}$
Fucktalogist
i looked at b)
but i was doing d)
guess that solves the problem
thx guys
.close
Closed by @tawny path
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
This is your work?
yep
could it be that it should be -2 instead of +2?
then everything would make sense in my head
because the brackets had a - before right?
am i correct?
im just so unsure if im doing it correct
.close
Closed by @tawny path
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont know where my mistake is ?
why do you think you're wrong
i dont see how you can go from the top half to the answer
this i mean
oh wait
mb sorry
just to clarify, have i broken any rules this time, i dont mean that in a satire sense i genuinely want to know.
multiply the x^(x-2) through and you'll get your expression
you can check by plotting them both using desmos
thank you, ye it matches
ooh i didnt think of that, thank you
.close
Closed by @hidden merlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is 3(t)^t in a(b)^c form ?
yes
Closed by @turbid path
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How many times does the graph f(x)=a(x-h)^2+k and g(x)=a|x-h|+k intersect?
i need an explanation
in
an 8th grade to 9th grade
way
please help
i need a simple way
to find
it
without graphinh
graphing
please
help
yes
ty
question
If you want to simplify it algebraically, you can set f(x)=g(x)
could u explain
i never learned partial factoring
In your problem?
wdym
Is the "a" variable in f(x) and g(x) the same?
Gotcha
Can you simply a|x-h|+k = a(x-h)^2+k up until you get stuck?
I'm still here
ok
So, do you know how to make two algebraic equations when you have absolute value?
Let's rewrite the right side first
(x-h)^2 side
It just makes it easier to see
Would you agree that (x-h)^2 = (x-h)(x-h)?
Yep
Working on my own hw, don't mind my slow responses
So, let's work with the absolute value side
ok
is this correct
Do you remember how to create two equations when you have two abs value?
Correct
Yes
ok
Can you write it out?
Not quite
Here's an example
The side opposite to the side of the absolute value side is what changes 👍
yeah
x-h = (x-h)(x-h)
x-h = -(x-h)(x-h)
whats next
Would it be more clear if I wrote it out as x-h = -[(x-h)(x-h)]?
Basically you make one entire side negative
Do you notice what both sides have in common?
Mhm!
So what you can do is cancel a (x-h) from both sides
x-h = (x-h)(x-h)
I am going to use the positive equation as an example
When you simplify that, what do you have next?
Wait actually, is this equation solveable?
God I would feel bad if this can't be taken further. I think there are equation has two unknowns tho so it should be
Oh yeah it definitely is, carry on ^^
so (x-h) would be remaining
Like, what's left on the x-h side once you divide both sides by x-h?
what about the negative one
like
By my question, or how to continue?
what u ment
by canceling
i do that to both equations
too
so
what would be left
Once you understand how to do it to the positive side, you'll pretty much be able to figure out how to do the negative side too
I was saying that after you simplified it, you could eliminate x-h
Until you got 1 = x-h
Mhm?
would be remaing
So, given the equation
x-h = (x-h)(x-h)
Looks right except that on the negative side, it should be -(x-h)(x-h) = x-h
Would you agree that the equation 1(x-h) = (x-h)(x-h) is the same as x-h = (x-h)(x-h)?
then
yes
And you have an (x-h) on both sides, right?
So how would you simplify it so that you can eliminate the (x-h) on both sides?
skitten
i did this
i gtg eat
dinner
so
could
u just explain
the steps and the answer
?
that will be nice
thanks
@glass terrace
SKitten
u there
please
dont bail
when we are this close
@glass terrace
<@&286206848099549185> could someone help me continue the work so far
this is what i did so far
and
i need to continue it'
please
<@&286206848099549185>
yea idk
my best guess would just be 2
because u have two solutions
-(x-h) and (x-h)
yeah
