#help-13
428200 messages · Page 497 of 429
That's already solved for x.
But 6x - 7 = 0 doesn't tell us what x is yet.
So, we have to solve for x.
What do you get for x?
Well, you know how in some movies there are different universes where history was different in the different universes?
OK, so the different or things are like different universes.
Like in one universe, x = 0, and in another universe, 6x - 7 = 0.
In the x = 0 universe, x is exactly the same number as 0.
Because that's what = means.
ye
Right, so let's use algebra to solve for x.
it equals to 0 because it isn't solved
continue
Oh, I mean that you should solve 6x - 7 = 0 for x.
6x - 7 = 0
What's the next line?
6x -7 =0
6x= +7
x=7/6
x=1 1/6
Good, except they say to leave it as an improper fraction.
So, x = 7/6 is the last line.
Almost.
oh
So, if this was on a paper test, you'd write x = 0 or x = 7/6.
ye
I have time for one more if you want.
Or if you want, you can try them on your own.
Sure.
What do they want you to do with that?
factor
wait lemme try reading my notes from class
Chai T. Rex
If you don't remember seeing that, we'll use the other way.
I'm just reading my notes rn
my buddy showed me how to solve this 1 but I don't understand how to get these numbers
Oh, I'll show you a way.
No, that's incorrect.
If you multiply that out, you don't get what you started with.
it's -37p+15p**^2** not -37p+15p
Right.
good
That's a good one.
I understand this 1
this 1 I don't understand lol
So, you take the ² coefficient and the constant term.
I was trying to figure it out
The coefficient on y² is 1, right?
can I show something and you tell me if I did it right?
OK.
Right, the factor pairs.
ye
ye
So,
2 × 150
-2 × -150
no good
still no good
Right, what about 4?
nope
nope
What about 6?
nope
What about 7?
nope
What about 9?
nope
What about 10?
nopw
Getting close, though.
yup
nope
15p² - 12p - 25p + 20
15p² - 25p - 12p + 20
No, that's not correct.
We have to write it out with the p term separated into two.
We don't know which order is right.
Does it make sense how I wrote them?
OK, so, the first one:
(15p² - 12p) + (-25p + 20)
We take out the largest common factor of both parentheses.
3
Almost.
What about the p part?
p to the what power?
Which power is the smallest?
3p(5p-4)
5(-5p+4)
Right, and the smallest p is p to the zero power.
Which means no ps.
OK, are the parenthesized parts the same yet?
3p(5p - 4) + 5(-5p + 4)
ye
Almost.
You just have to take the negative out of the last one.
15?
See how one has (5p - 4) and one has (-5p + 4)?
They're the negatives of each other.
Because all the signs are opposites.
5p and -5p, -4 and 4.
So, you can pull the negative out of the second one.
how
3p(5p - 4) + 5(-5p + 4)
3p(5p - 4) - 5(5p - 4)
Now the parentheses are the same.
yeh
oki
Or (b + c)a = ba + ca
So, we have 3p**(5p - 4)** - 5**(5p - 4)**
yup
ye
We can get the (b + c)a = ba + ca side from that.
(3p - 5)(5p - 4)
3p(5p - 4) - 5(5p - 4)
Sorry?
nth keep going
ye
I did the distributed property backwards.
That's a way to factor.
OK, so that should be the answer.
We just have to check it.
The way to check it is to multiply it out.
See if it's what we started with.
(3p - 5)(5p - 4)
What does that expand to?
15p^2 - 12p - 25p +20
OK, now combine like terms.
15p^2 -37p +20
And that's what we started with, so that's the right answer.
omg that's so cool
any chance you can summarize what we did
like the steps
I need to write this down to practice
OK, so we get it in standard form, where the exponents go from highest to lowest.
Then we multiply together A and C.
ye
Then we try the factor pairs to see which add together to get B.
Then we don't know which order they come in, so we try one order. If it doesn't work, we try the other order.
So, like:
15p² - 12p - 25p + 20
15p² - 25p - 12p + 20
We separate that old -37p.
It separates two different ways.
So we try both.
When we try one, we put parentheses like this:
(15p² - 12p) + (-25p + 20)
Then we factor the GCF out of each parentheses.
3p(5p - 4) + 5(-5p + 4)
And we see if the parenthesized parts are the same or negatives of each other.
If so, we continue. If not, we go to the other way of separating them.
But these are negatives of each other.
So, we just take the negative out of one of them.
3p(5p - 4) - 5(5p - 4)
Now the parentheses are the same.
Then you put the parts in front of the parentheses together.
(3p - 5)(5p - 4)
And then you check your work with FOIL.
See if you get what you started with.
If you want to get good at doing this, do a lot of problems.
If you run out of problems and you want to do more, here's how to make a new problem:
Fill two sets of parentheses with a number times a variable plus a number. Same variable in both:
(10p + 6)(8p - 7)
Use FOIL and combine like terms:
80p² - 70p + 48p - 42
80p² - 22p - 42
Now, start with 80p² - 22p - 42 and see if you get the parentheses you started with.
gimme like 5-10 min
OK.
Breaks are good.
@left hound Has your question been resolved?
@left hound Yes.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
back
Hello.
hb dis 1
is this right?
I don't seem to understand how he pulled all these numbers from
unless he's wrong again
It's mostly right.
Line 5 is wrong.
Notice how all the terms have a factor of -4x²y².
You can undistribute it.
-4x²y²(2x⁵y⁶) - 4x²y²(x⁴y) - 4x²y²(-3)
-4x²y²(2x⁵y⁶ + x⁴y - 3)
alr
starting from the question
he changed the format
then he divide everything by 2?
It's put into standard form on the second line.
-4x²y² is factored out of the first two terms on the third line.
-4x²y² is factored out of the third term on the fourth line.
Then you can just undistribute from there.
OK, they have + 12x²y² on the end.
They change that to - 4x²y²(-3) by factoring out -4x²y².
oh oki oki
hb 5th line?
collect like terms?
how he write line 5?
looks weird at the end of line 5
The fifth line is wrong.
alr
what should the 5th line look like?
Well, you have:
-4x²y²(2x⁵y⁶) - 4x²y²(x⁴y) - 4x²y²(-3)
Notice how the part in front of the parentheses is the same on all three.
So, how would it look undistributed?
what does undistributed mean?
Well, the distributive property is a(b + c + d) = ab + ac + ad
Notice how you have the right side.
You have the same thing times three different things, just like the distributive law has the same thing times three different things.
ye
a(b + c + d) = ab + ac + ad
So, we want to start on the right side and get to the left side.
So, a is the thing attached to all three.
And -4x²y² is the thing attached to all three in your problem.
And it's in front of the parentheses on the left.
-4x²y²(…)
ye
And then, inside the parentheses, you have the three things -4x²y² was attached to.
Just like in the distributive law, you have the three things that were attached to a.
-4x²y²(2x⁵y⁶) - 4x²y²(x⁴y) - 4x²y²(-3)
-4x²y²(2x⁵y⁶ + x⁴y - 3)
Another way to see it is that the things in parentheses get added together in new parentheses.
5x(2y) + 5x(-6) + 5x(7x)
5x(2y - 6 + 7x)
Does that make sense?
So, this is the factored form:
-4x²y²(2x⁵y⁶ + x⁴y - 3)
It has the GCD of the three original terms in front.
And then it has what the GCD was multiplied by on each term in parentheses.
So, like if I have 20 + 60 + 12.
I get it now
Oh, OK.
Well, he factored this part 2**(-x - 6 + x²)**.
The 2 is done.
It's a coefficient or a linear factor.
But the part in parentheses isn't linear (degree 1), it's quadratic (degree 2), so it can probably be factored into two linear factors.
And that's what he did.
yes but how did he do it
With that method from before.
-x - 6 + x²
Put it in standard form.
x² - x - 6
Multiply A and C.
I mean from the second last line to the last line
Right, that's how that was done.
ye
So, the factors have to be two numbers that are right next to each other.
oki
Like -20 and 19.
Because that's the only way to get -1.
And AC = -6
So, it can't be 1 and -6 or -1 and 6.
But 2 times 3 makes 6.
true
that's why I didn't see that
he didn't write down that step
2 & -3
make 6
dis 1?
That looks fine, but check it by expanding to make sure.
alr
Hey I have question
when I was doing the AC
he didn't get the right number I don't think
should be 3 and 6
Right, 3 and -6.
So, we have either:
(9x² - 3x) + (6x - 2)
(9x² + 6x) + (-3x - 2)
Depending on whether -3x or 6x comes first.
OK, so:
(9x² + 6x) + (-3x - 2)
ye
So, take out the GCD of both.
3(3x^2 + 2x)
Don't forget to take out the lowest power of x.
3(3x^2+2x) (-3x-2)
That's part of the GCD too.
Yes, that's right.
And then you have (3x + 2) and (-3x - 2), which are negatives of each other.
So, you take the negative out of one of them.
3(3x+2) -(3x+2)
No, you have to undistribute.
how I do that part again?
Right now, you have subtraction as your main operation.
ye
Factors are things you multiply together, so you should get multiplication as your main operation.
A bunch of things multiplied together.
So, you have 3x(3x + 2) - (3x + 2)
The parts outside the parentheses are 3x and -1.
Do you see why the -1?
ye
OK, you just put the parts outside the parentheses in their own parentheses.
(3x - 1)(3x + 2)
So, you have
-3(9x² + 3x - 2)
-3(3x - 1)(3x + 2)
And notice how you have three things multiplied together.
Factoring gives you a bunch of things multiplied together.
And that's what we have.
We also have a number and two degree-1 polynomials.
So, we're done factoring once everything is below degree 2.
Some degree 2 and above can't be factored nicely.
Like x² + 5.
So if they can't be done, you just leave them.
But try to get everything below degree 2 if you can.
From the problem we just did, no.
You dropped the +
You also forgot the x.
3(3x + 2)(-3x - 2)
should be
3x(3x + 2) + (-3x - 2)
3x(3x + 2) - (3x + 2)
If you can, have a piece of paper you work on.
When you go to the next line, change one thing only about the previous line.
Like if you have
(9x² + 6x) + (-3x - 2)
You can factor the first parentheses
3x(3x + 2) + (-3x - 2)
Only one thing was done and everything else is exactly the same.
That way the + doesn't disappear.
Well, then you factor the second parentheses, but that's done already.
You forgot the + again.
If that happens a lot, when you're done writing a line, make sure it's exactly the same as the previous line except for just one change.
That will make the paper keep track of everything correctly instead of your head.
Which can make it easier to get the correct answer.
where do I go from here tho
The second parentheses is factored.
So, you check whether the parentheses are the same or negatives of each other.
If it's either one, that's good.
If they're negatives of each other, take the negative out of one of them.
So, do that.
3x(3x+2) - (3x+2)
Good, now take the parts outside the equal parenthesized parts into their own parentheses.
Nope.
3x(3x + 2) - (3x + 2)
The parts before each parentheses are 3x and -1.
So, you add them together in their own parentheses.
(3x - 1)(3x + 2)
-3(3x-1)(3x+2)
Right.
And everything is below degree 2, so you're done except for checking it.
Just expand to check.
See if you get what you started with.
It's the difference of squares technique.
(a + b)(a - b) = a² - b²
Notice how the right side is two squared numbers subtracted.
Called the difference of two squares.
So, whenever you see that, you take the square root of both of them.
In one parentheses, you put them added. In another, you put them subtracted.
a² - b²
(a + b)(a - b)
Does that make sense?
Yes, that would work because it doesn't matter what order you multiply things in.
So, like 3 × 5 × 6 = 3 × 6 × 5
You can rearrange them.
So, you're just rearranging the two parenthesized parts.
Yes, but put the Ts in order of the subscript.
h = 100T₁ - 100T₂
Like variables are alphabetical order and then if they're the same letter, you do what's attached to them in order.
Looks good.
Fill in -15/7 in the original equation for z and see if the sides are equal.
That's how you check solving.
Yeah, a fraction times its reciprocal is 1, so it gets rid of the fraction.
Subtracted 3 from both sides.
alr
-7z/5 + 3 = 6
-7z/5 + 3 - 3 = 6 - 3
-7z/5 = 3
Yeah, it's not well-written.
Chai T. Rex
Does that make sense?
The answer is at the bottom: -5/7
ik but how he get that
Do you understand why they multiply by both denominators?
where he get the 7x?
I understand the 4x(3x+1) part
Why do they do that?
common demominator
It gets rid of both denominators.
Chai T. Rex
Do you understand these steps?
cross multiply
Well, distribute.
The 4x(3x + 1) gets distributed to both fractions.
And then the denominator cancels one of the factors in 4x(3x + 1).
For the first fraction, the 4x is cancelled, leaving 3x + 1 multiplied by the 5.
For the second fraction, the 3x + 1 is cancelled, leaving 4x multiplied by the -2.
Chai T. Rex
Well, I have 5(3x + 1) - 2(4x), right?
ye
What does that expand to?
15x+5 - 8x
Combine like terms.
It's incorrect.
from where is it wrong?
Line 6 should be -5/(2y) = -29/24. It's missing the - on the right.
And then they multiply both sides by 24y.
So, the left side becomes -60.
The right side becomes -29y
I have to go in five minutes.
Yes, -60 = -29y is correct.
They forgot a minus sign on the sixth line.
Other than that, it's correct.
The 24y line is a bit misleading, since it's not an equation. It just tells what they're multiplying both sides by.
alr
-5/(2y) = 29/24
should be
-5/(2y) = -29/24
Make sure you don't just review how someone else did them.
That'll help you to understand a little, sure, but you need practice to really get it.
y= -9/20
Like people can tell you how to ride a bike, but you don't really get it until you ride it a while and learn how to stay upright.
No, 29 is prime and 60 isn't a multiple of it, so it's a reduced fraction already.
oh yeh
sorry my head is everywher e
I woke up at 8:00 for work and it's like 5:33am rn
tryna study before the test
Oh, OK. I'd recommend sleep.
It'll help on the test and you solidify what you were just learning before sleep when you sleep.
aww fr?
alrr
wait a sec
nvm
I understand how to do #17 18 and 19 lol
only #16 if that's ok with you
Yeah, my room is dirty and I have to have it clean in about 2.5 hours.
OK, I can do one more.
They skipped some steps.
They multiply both sides by 8x(5x - 3).
[\frac1{8(5x - 3)} + \frac1{2x} = -\frac5{5x - 3}]
[8x(5x - 3)\qty(\frac1{8(5x - 3)} + \frac1{2x}) = 8x(5x - 3)\qty(-\frac5{5x - 3})]
Chai T. Rex
Try the expansions on both sides.
Don't expand the small parentheses.
Distribute 8x(5x - 3) to the things inside the big parentheses.
on the left side it would just cancel out
left with 1/2x = 40x-24
On the left side, yes it does somewhat.
No, it can't cancel out that way.
Distribute 8x(5x - 3) to 1/(8(5x - 3)) and to 1/(2x).
What do you get for both of them?
not too sure
Well, just multiply.
oh oki
Chai T. Rex
ye
So, what do you get for the first term after cancelling?
first fraction ends up with 0
left with just 1
What about the second term?
Well, you just multiply the part in front into the top.
8x(5x-3)/2x
Chai T. Rex
4x(5x-3)
Chai T. Rex
The 8 cancels the 2 leaving 4 in the top.
oh
The x cancels the x getting rid of both.
20x -20
Almost.
What do you get before combining like terms just after you expand?
No, that's further off.
x + 4(5x - 3)
What does 4(5x - 3) expand to?
k
Chai T. Rex
What cancels?
this 1 more tricky
Well, you can first multiply the part in front onto the numerator.
What do you get from that?
40x^2 -24
40x
What is that referring to?
8x times 5? you mean?
What about the (5x - 3) in front?
It's not a bad thing, I just think you're tired.
It's hard to learn when you're tired.
40x(5x-3) then 200x^2 -120
No, but you don't want to expand.
Notice how you have (5x - 3) on the top and bottom.
Leave things factored.
40x^2
Almost.
Chai T. Rex
So, we have 21x - 12 = -40x.
For the steps we've done?
ye
It'll take a few minutes.
Chai T. Rex
@left hound
You're welcome.
Because that's the GCD of all the denominators.
Multiplying both sides by the GCD of all denominators gets rid of the denominators.
question.....
why not do greatest common denominator first
like uhh
8x(5x-3) / 8(5x-3) = 8x
then 8x multiply the top would be 8
first the first fraction
etc
I don't understand what you mean.
I send you picture
That's essentially what we did.
But it equals x instead of 8x.
And that's what we got for the first term.
I don't understand what's going on there.
I did the GCD
the first divide is the first fraction demoninator
2nd divide is the second fraction demininator
3rd divide is third fraction demoninator
OK, but you also need to put their numerators.
yup
The numerators aren't all the same.
oki
1 times x = X
1 times 4x(5x-3) = 4x(5x-3)
5 times 8x= -40x
so it would be x + 4x(5x-3) = -40x
yk?
Yeah, but that's still not quite right.
I mean, if you can do the cancellation in your head, that's fine.
But it's easy to make mistakes.
Yes, if you do it correctly, but the second term is wrong.
You're essentially doing the cancelling in your head rather than on paper.
But it's easy to make a mistake that way.
whats wrong with the 2nd?
It has an extra x.
ohhh
4x(5x - 3) should be 4(5x - 3).
When I was learning this, I had a way to avoid errors.
Just change one thing from the previous line, and make sure everything else is exactly the same.
That way, you can focus on getting the step you're doing on that line correct.
OK, have a good rest and test.
6 hours lol
You're welcome.
Thankss!!
No problem.
.close
Closed by @left hound
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone double check this for me?
Or if i did something wrong (dont wanna lose points cuz teacher grades hw harshly)
Looks good
uhh this homework is graded?
ok then you shouldn't be asking for help then
am i not allowed to?
Oh yeah
i thought as long as im not asking people to do it its fine?
Depends
Does your teacher forbid asking for help, i.e do they want you to do it by yourself
okay well, im going to be studying for this calc exam very soon, i plan on doing a ton of practice problems on my own
in that case is it fine if i ask to double check
academic dishonesty is not highly encouraged, since homework are being graded for a reason
It’s common sense
oh well, dont know, will let the <@&268886789983436800> deal with this
If you’re supposed to do it by yourself, you can’t get help
okay i'll avoid asking homework questions here
but i'll ask for help for my own personal studying
give him a chance first
If you’re allowed to consult other people, it’s okay
he said we are allowed to discuss with classmates
but no copying
idk if he grades homework for completion or for every problem
and correctness
Closed due to the original message being deleted
The sort of thing that’s banned if when you can’t discuss it with anyone, i.e it’s for you and you only
that seems much more like a test
online exam or something
thats definitely not what this is
definitely have received a lot of help when doing even problems in the book that dont have answers in the back
so i'll mainly utilize this discord for that use then
thank you :)
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
use one channel for question, dont ping helpers from the beginning and ask your question
are you a helper?
It doesn’t matter they’re right
1 channel, and don’t ping helpers immediately be patient
close one of the open channels
why does it matter
Read the message above yours…
can i become helper?
Read the rules maybe
shush peasent
So helpers know where to look for people who’ve actually been waiting a long time
Contact a moderator
how did you become?
I contacted a moderator lmao
sorry @remote dust for using your channel but we are here
ok lol
Just be patient
@remote dust Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this right?
yes
alr
I got question about that 1
when it comes to this type of question
I ignore the outside 4x and just use the bracketed number?
If the product of two things are zero, then either the left one or the right one must be zero
Then you can essentially split the problem into two
Looks right to me
using the quadratic roots formula
can you guild me on how
if you have an equation that cannot be easily factored and is in the form ax^2 + bx +c = 0
Then you can use the formula and substitute the values of a, b and c in it to get the answer
I looked it up and it's still confusing me
A= 2
B= 4
C=-1
I understand that part
but idk what to do from there
ye
fr?
yeah
look for the "equations" section on the calculator and choose the one where the function has the form of ax^2 + bx + c = 0
its usually from menu, and option 3 on a casio calculator
could u send a picture of your calculator lol
@left hound choose unknowns as 2
alr
and uh go to the place where it said unknowns
and
press right on the big menu thing
so that it says "degree"
and then choose 2
and do the same thing
oki
how do I type it tho
wait
I got x1= 0.22474
-2.2247
so what's my answer?
they want it in p= something
@left hound Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is a hexagon in an isosceles triangle.
Can anyone give me a hint to solve the area of the hexagon myself?
Sure it's really obvious that it's not solvable without that!
maybe split the hexa into triangles
How can I find the side of it?
Doesn't look doable. You can grow the hexagon and just make the triangle taller to fit
However you can relate area to height, that'd be cool
@ripe hamlet Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @ripe hamlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I have that type of expression and I need to find n, is there any way to actually calculate it instead of just guessing numbers which will fit in? (I'm asking in general, for instance, with higher numbers it would be impossible to guess that number) Thanks.
2^(n/3) = 2^(5)
n/3 = 5
yea
okay, and how would you get the factorise (5) if there would be bigger number
i don't know how it's called in english
factorise
okay
$\left(\sqrt[3]{2}\right)^n=\left(2^{\frac{1}{3}}\right)^n$
Big xdddd
$log_{2}(32)=5$
Big xdddd
oh
if you exponent both sides you get $32=2^5$
Big xdddd
no problem
should i close it now?
if you dont have any other questions sure
Closed by @static valve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is time the derivative of distance with respect to speed?
wha
@empty parrot Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @empty parrot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello i need some help getting the volume and surface area of this triangular prism