#help-13
1 messages · Page 414 of 1
You got it now
well done! 
Hm
But my high school professor is pretty strict
I don’t think she will accept that as a result
😔
You could explain how you got it, at least 
Sure
But we are doing algorithms
I mean
Idk
Is there another way to do the task ?
There isn't really many other ways to do it that are notably different from this way, tbh 
Wait
Imma check the results
On the book
I don’t usually do it since I try to practice on my own
But in this case it’s fine ig
@cerulean sail
That was the way

Ty
Hahah, told ya
it's pretty much like that 
It's been a pleasure 
But how do I practice that logic though
Because it isn’t like an equation
Where you just mindlessly calculate

Hmmm, that is a good question, one for which I personally don't have a good answer for
a good place to ask that one would be #study-discussion, for me I'm good at explaining how to do certain problems, but not so great at study tips and stuff like that, sadly 

It might just come from experience ig
My problem is that
I can understand topics
And classes
No problem
But I’m bad at tasks like these
Where
I have to come up with a way
Instead of learning it
😔
Anyways ty
For examples like these, it's mostly thinking a bit through what you've learned really, and trying to break things down backwards, like for this one, it's a bit about understanding how you get the mean, you add everything up and then divide it by how many people you have
So you know that there's a person in the group, if you remove them, the average changes but there's one less person you're considering, so basically thinking about the fact you can get the sum of everyone's heights from both of those, and whatever "extra" there is must be John 
And it's been a pleasure to help 
Ty
If I ever need more help I’ll hit you up
Kinda upset I didn’t get this one by myself though since it was pretty simple but oh well
Yea sure, or in these channels there are plenty of people who're happy to help and spend time with you 
If you can Ofcourse
I’m pretty tired tho so let’s say that’s the reasoning 
There are always things like that sometimes, you'll be fine 
I did a similar question by myself tho
If you’re interested
If not I’ll leave ya alone

I might have to get some rest soonish so I may be coming off, but if it isn't too long, I don't mind 
Average age of a football team is 25.5 out of 11 players , one player gets ejected and his age is 20.5 , what is the average age of the remaining players
I did (25.5 x 11 - 20.5 )/ 10
Divided for the second one? 
Divided everything by 10 yes
And you get 26
Thanks
Anyways I gotta go sleep
I’ll get 7 hours of sleep or so if I go rn so
Gn
Goodnight, sleep well 
.close
Closed by @split ice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i'm did it 
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not sure where to start
,rccw
im thinking to set a cost equation that would be like 2hl + 2hw + wl
yeah
but im not sure what to do from there
i dont wanna say anything but ur on track
i set the cost equation in terms of H, and derived it, now I find the critical points and check which one is the minimum?
.close
Closed by @cunning flint
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey im taking my asvab test tmr and i need help studying can any please help me i suck at math

@spare widget Has your question been resolved?
it's multiple choice, you could cheese it by just plugging in the point (0,-1) and noticing that only one answer is possible
i needa know the formula too
$\frac{y-y_1}{y_1 -y_2}=\frac{x-x_1}{x_1 -x_2}$
vικτιμιζερ
ngl this all look like gibrish to me
$$ $(x_1 ,y_1)$ and $(x_2 ,y_2)$ are two coordinates$$
so the x are the first number
Yes
vικτιμιζερ
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.CLOSE
.close
Closed by @sullen cipher
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
(it's case sensitive)
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let me translate the problem it follows as:
The dimension in meters of a rectangular room is the root of the following equation:
X² - 12x + 32 = 0
dimension?
Also a room would have three dimensions
oh you mean like the length of the sides
In order to cover all the room using 70cm each side how much tiles will be used to cover the room
yeah sorry for misstranslatio
you know how to solve the equation ?
Ahhh the floor, then it's fine
No, i know the result as i throwed it in photomath
but i wanna know how to actually do the equation
Well, basically first of all find the values of x
You know how to solve quadratics right?
no 😭
i have it written on my notebook rn
so let me see if this is correct
A = X² B= 12x C= 32
Whoa, well this question should only be attempted if you can solve quadratics ngl
What is the result you got from that, and what have you tried to solve it yourself?
4 and 8 both positive
im pretty sure for the form you are using its A=1 B=-12 C=32
Yeah seems fine
ill maybe try and learn and come back later
should i?
yea
Alright then, considering you now have the values of x it shouldn't be much of a problem now
If your question is about solving quadratic equations, you should definitely go learn that before asking about this problem
yeah also context im trynna pass on this really really prestigious college and math is my weakest subject
Tons of resources online that can teach you
and im pretty smart i have 9-10 on all subjects so they accepted me to do the exam
but the exam is all math and this is one of the questions the last year exam asked for
(except math) useless info
wish me luck
You're still gonna have to know stuff mate, if you're smart then you can learn it quicker, that'd be better and you'd understand it more
ok ill just wait the time and close this help channel ill come back when i learn the basics needed to this
Alright then, for this question, just learn how to solve a quadratic equation
It'll show two formulae, learn both of them
It just sounds better than formulas
Well, you can close this channel and open another one once you've learned the topic
No problem dude
how do i close it before the time?
.close
.close
Closed by @rapid temple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is differential calc easier than multivariable calc
uhh... you're comparing univariate/single-variable differential calc to multivar calc?
@dire radish Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what are the functions 7 and 9?
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
the assignment is to get the derivative
need the functions
for 9,
i thought it might be something like 1/x
but it looks different
and for 7 i have no clue
we’re supposed to match it to a derivative function
9 is S and 7 is O
on the key
but idk how to get
Well 9 should be easy enough, use the power rule
so 9 is it x + 1/x, becomes 1 + 1/x^2
Yep
what about 7 ? how do u know it has e so it stays the same if its a derivative, but why does the key say its O
It is o, don't forget the chain rule
Anything else?
Closed by @frigid shadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not sure where to start. I think f'(-10) has something to do with derivatives like perhaps using x^(n-1) to reformat to help find f'(-10)? Have to use f(x) = 15 to find f'(-10), perhaps some sort of solving where you divide or set something equal to eachother to find f'(-10).
What is f'(x)?
is there more to the question?
are they saying that f is the constant function 15, or it's equal to 15 at some x, or what?
.close
Closed by @burnt raptor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is the given graph f(x)?
Y= f(x) yes
What do I do in this scenario?
X would =2 wouldn’t it?
Or can we not assume that?
Btw each box is 4 units wide and 5 units high
What do you mean by this?
I retract that statement idk where I was getting that from
But what would the first step be?
Alright so, the first question is: Do you know how to translate this stuff into English?
What do you mean?
Like what does it mean, its definition etc
Well there’s a limit as x approaches 12
And to find it
You need to use the formula given
yes, anything else you find?
B it would be indeterminate wouldn’t it be?
Or it wouldn’t because
No it would be because X = 20 at that point
What's B?
But it*
Let's clarify, this stuff is basically asking for the limit when x approaches 12, right?
Yeah
Do you know the slope formula?
how about its denominator?
Use the slash 😭
it's only half done
The denominator would be x2-x1
This is sad 😢
Right?
We now replace $y_1$ and $y_2$ with $f(x_1)$ and $f(x_2)$
This is sad 😢
$\frac{f(x_1)-f(x_2)}{x_1-x_2}$
This is sad 😢
That's the basic definition of derivative
and yes, it requires the concept of slope
Do you find anything interesting?
Ooh that checks out why I was having trouble, I’m not great with definition of derivative problems
Mmmm think give me a hint?
Regarding this?
Sure why not
nah, you're too fast, lemme finish
Ok ok
So do you agree that this guy is telling you the slope between two points, if you remove the limit notation?
Yes
This is sad 😢
and for every x you plug in, this stuff tells you the slope between (x, f(x)) and (12, f(12))
got ya so far?
Yeah I’m following
Right
Let's take the limit notation back
So this stuff says "when x is very very very VERY close to 12, what would be the slope"
Yeah I understand that bit too
the slope between (x, f(x)) and (12, f(12))
But what number would I then plug in for (x,f(x))?
and yes, that's the definition of derivative, is there any provided piecewise function in the question?
You'll need the piecewise function, otherwise we have nothing to diff
Well here’s the whole problem, it just states that y=f(x)
Do you see where my confusion sprouts from now?
Well I used the graph to find (88,y)
And then i estimated the slope, which seemed to be -0.5
uhhh......doesn't seem to be a legit approach
but sure, given that your teacher didn't provide any function either
Find f(12) in graph by seeing the grid
If it's coming out to be 20
Then 0/0 form you can do lopital rule
Main question is how we gotta find the function by just looking at graph
I was gonna say
We haven’t been taught Lolita’s rule yet so we aren’t allowed to use it :(
I understand it could be helpful in this situation but we haven’t gotten there yet
you don't need that here
Oh
Ohk
I think Indian mathematics is a quite on higher side
All you need is a well-defined function
But we don’t have that
Absolutely true
Have you contacted your teacher for this?
No, it’s a common occurrence for the last question on our homework to be rather difficult or even impossible
But he’ll find a way to muster up an answer
Of the first derivative*
I presume this one falls into the second category
I’d agree but he always has an answer
With an explanation too, which makes it even more confusing because it puts me in awe that he would even know what to do
If that makes sense
LOL, uh I mean...sure
idk how would they excuse this
idk if we can take it as a quadratic function
It's definitely not the right way to do in normal circumstances, but why not give it a try
I suppose if there are no other options
Could you do something like
(20-10)/(12-10)?
Mmm idk about that actually
ok hit and trial fr
what does this represent?
The slope formula
(10,10) is a point on the function?
no, you cannot do that. Since the derivative of f is supposed to yield a slope that tangent to the spot
Doing so does not guarantee that
I would recommend this
Using the quadratic formula?
Setting $ax^2 + bx + c = 0$
This is sad 😢
Find three points on that goofy function
How do we know that it’ll = 0?
find a, b, c, and manually generate a function that looks alike to the curve
mb, autopiloted
Ohhh I see
Setting $f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c$
This is sad 😢
We haven’t learned this either, I may just go in early tomorrow during the professor’s office hours to ask what he wants me to do
Alright
I greatly appreciate your help though, thank you very much
Feel free to claim another help channel tomorrow if you're still confused
no worries, have a good one
I have a question, we can't use lhopital here?
Thanks, you too
You can, actually
Can’t use it because it hasn’t been covered in class yet
but not necessary
oh
It’s a very unfortunate series of events
Alright, I’m heading to bed, good night you guys, thank you very much, if I’m still confused tomorrow you’ll likely be seeing me again
Have a good one
its the limit definition of a derivative not sure how much that would help
Unless Webster has some sort of anomaly
It's like using an airplane to go to the grocery store
yeah, I've already mentioned that
It 100% is
Hullo Taylor Swift
The problem is that we lack a well-defined function
i have gathered that
I’m gonna head in early tomorrow, would you guys like an update after the answer is reveiwed in class?
Sure
Closed by @sullen pendant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Anything Xavier?
Nothing that hasn't been said yet no
nah, he can reopen himself if he has anything to say
Abusing power like it's going out of fashion
You were, this problem is just beyond difficult
...you are
It's just underspecified
Exactly thank you
Difficult problems are solvable still
Alright I think I’m heading to bed, if you guys think of anything and are curious to find out for yourself you can always DM me or send a friend request, thanks to all of you out there trying to help me, have a good one
.close
Closed by @sullen pendant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Good night!
hi
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, i know it's kinda late, but i've been stumped by this exercise that i have literally no idea on how to even start it, i've done some research and i got something called symmetrical integral, but my teacher hasn't explained it and it seemed a bit too cryptid for me to understand by reading it from the webpage, the most i got was to understand that i have to use sustitution but i don't really know, can anybody help me?
a symmetric integral means that the function looks as if its mirrored; in this case, its mirrored across the y-axis
with symmetry, instead of taking the integral from -3 to 0 and from 0 to -3, you can just calculate the integral from 0 to 3 and multiply it by 2 (since they should have the same value by symmetry)
(u can also get rid of the pesky absolute value that way too)
in my class we haven't got to graphs yet, but i assume that the -3 to 3 is what you mean by mirrored
that, and if i flip the function over the y-axis, it should look mirrored
analytically this mirroring's better stated as f(-x)=f(x), or something to that effect
oh, so, something like this?
oo
The limits for u aren't the same as the limits for x
Also your 1 looks like a 7, might wanna fix that
Whenever you're substituting you gotta be careful of that
Usually it ends up not mattering cuz you write it in terms of x at the end before plugging in values
But it's still good practice
that's odd but it kinda makes sense, bc i've done exercises where i have to substitute and i don't change the limits, but since i
yeye that
that's what i was noticing rn when i went to check for my previous problems
i almos had a heart attack thinking that i had to redo and rethink
40 problems 😟
ok, how do i do that?
Well when x is 0 what is u
yep through that
yep
so this
yup, i think that should be good
woil you could, but thatd just add more work; easier to just use the new limits with u, since you already went through the trouble of converting from x to u
it won't change the answer?
well i guess i can test that by myself, i don't want to add more work to you
so, please correct me if i'm wrong, but it should look something like this?
that should be the gist of it, yes
oh alr, thank you very much for helping me!, have a nice night/day (in my country is 12:35 AM)
.close
Closed by @craggy tusk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello can someone explain what the dirac delta function is i found somewhere saying it can be considered as the derivative of the step function but isnt that just 0 everywhere
Dirac delta function can mean a lot of things depending on what context you found it in
In physics, it's a function which is 0 everywhere and "infinity" at a point
And it integrates to 1
Don't ask
is it not 1 specific function
ask what
Well depending on the context it's not even a function
how can it be infinity at a point
Cuz physics
In measure theory, it's more well defined
The dirac measure is essentially
You pick a point, and if the set contains that point it has measure 1
If not it has measure 0
what are you even saying at this point
Hence me asking what context you found it in
in math
is it not defined the same for all math context
More specific?
Very few things are
differential equations
how is that the case
how can definition change based on the context
im refering to delta dirac function
so what is this function do we have a formula for it
Well the dirac delta function is quite literally what I said at first
It's 0 everywhere and infinity at 0
It's used to model point masses and stuff
Well that's δ(x)
why we write δ(t-a)
What about δ(2x+1) perhaps
Exactly, this is 0 everywhere and infinity when t-a = 0
so at a
Mathematically, dirac delta is a linear form acting on functions
but how is that possible
It's not, but it's helpful for physics modelling
arent functions defined from C->C at most
how can something be teached in maths if its mathematically wrong
It's not.. wrong. You just don't have the tools to properly define it yet
can I share a link here for OP to try to read, if he wants to try understanding the Dirac delta function?
Sure go ahead
I have been tempted to send the wikipedia link lol
whats OP?
the motivation behind the Dirac delta function.
It is the same idea I believe
electron trapped in a potential well
is like U(x)
where U=0 inside a domain
and U= +oo
outside
something like this
Yes, physics modelling often requires infinite values
so what does it mean to write down δ(0) = +οο
well actually better question is how we define infinity
cause so far ive treated infinity as a concept like i write lim f = +oo but i can never do arithmitics with it like write down 5 (+oo)
We don't.
Thata how you would think about it "intuitivly" and what we actually use are the properties of it.
Whenever you have a dirac delta function, you usually don't care about its value at a point
You care about what happens when you integrate it
i care about the point
That's interesting
Technically it's not a function and integrating it is just pretend shorthand
probably xy
Yeah this is xy territory
so how do we define infinity
Who's doing it
for example we can define 5 as the successor of 4
how can we define something that is bigger than any other number
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
idek if it is a number
there are all sorts of infinities
Well you can define ordinals
cardinal numbers, ordinals, one-point compactification, extended reals, hyperreals, surreals, etc
We have moved way too far from the original problem
Could you send your original question please
Cuz at this point we are just talking concepts
idc about the original problem
there is no problem
i solve everything
only problem is understanding what this is and why my source avoided talking about it
Most likely cuz you lack the tools to properly define it now
But it's still useful to have
Should we introduce measure theory?
I tried at the very start if you scroll up
what course do you learn that in
Measure theory
is that Real analysis or something
Exact course name would depend on your curriculum
After real analysis
Yes
this pisses me off
You can get a taste of measure theory
is there no way for you to somehow tell me what we "mean" when saying a point is at infinity
as to where it is
I understand that feeling
Okay fine I'll try
The dirac delta function integrates to 1 over ℝ
And we want the area where it's non-zero to be as small as possible
yea its same way it pissed me off some months ago when i was in highschool and they were saying the when you split an interval and choose ξκ is does not affect the result of the Sum
So we define it as a limit of functions
All of these functions have area 1
And we slowly reduce the area where they are non-zero
well so its not a point ?
At the limit it is
Have you done sequences of functions
we call it infinity but in reality its just that for every M>0 blah blah blah
Extended reals are very well defined
yea well which is it
is it at infinity
or is that that for every M>0 there is ...
?
ive finished calc 2 im in middle of calc 3 and ive seen all proofs of the stuff in those
and im like 2/3 in differential equations
so series go up to like taylor series
binomial
is there any specific sequence you want to refer to?
ive only skipped 1 ε,δ proof in sequences i think cause it got too complicated
so i should know what you need
i see the limit definition
$\delta_a(x) = \frac{1}{\abs{a}\sqrt{\pi}} e^{-(\frac{x}{a})^2}$
but the problem is this should only be valid for when lim converges
this the formula?
Xavier 🌺
yea ik what this function looks like
Now look at this as a goes to infinity
Gaussian integral looking
oh a not x?
It's a sequence of functions
From you saying this, I'm not sure you've done sequences of functions
yea i havent done this notation no
but i understand and can do it
i have done series represenation of functions
but isnt this only valid if it converges?
Wait as a goes to 0 my bad
ok lemme calculate it
I will once again say, some things are okay to use as black boxes since you don't have the tools to rigorously understand them. And I understand that this can be unsatisfying but you'll just have to be patient
i mean i dont want to rigosly
but like atleast
as an idea
What I have given here doesn't exactly work, but it is as close as I can get without having to teach you measure theory and distribution stuff
damn
this |a| is really annoying
cant even do DLH
case work ig
@chrome elk how do we calculate this
Heck if I know lmao
wtf man
bro got me struggling when not even he knows
DLH doesnt work just keeps bringing a down
well lets take easy case x=0
then its positive infinity
whats the point
I told you this is a bad idea given the tools you have rn
can you maybe
idk tell me what a point at infinity means in words
like is it with the limit definition
Literally nothing, all we want is the function to integrate to 1
is it that the point is >M for every M>0
And this is how we define it
is that it?
Sure if you want that
Like I said, you will never work with this function outside of an integral
that makes a lot more sense than saying its at infinity
why not
So all you care about is how its integrals behave
why will i not is it not allowed
this is so odd but ok ig ill leave it behind
for now
Essentially yes
The function doesn't exist per se
It's just useful to say it does and use its integral
ill leave it before i start asking questions that bring us to other theories
dirac delta is essentially the map $f \mapsto f(0)$
Pseudo (Cat theory #1 Fan)
at least this is how i like to think of it
Yeah the next question you ask I'm going to throw linear forms at you
Oh nvm Pseudo already did, thank you
what does f->f(0) mean?
the idea is that dirac-delta is a "higher-order function"
havent seen this notation
e.g. maybe the input to dirac delta would be the function "sin(x)"
then the output would be sin(0) = 0
that's alright
ok thanks for the help guys
appreciate taking your time with my annoying arguing questions
.close
Closed by @karmic field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It tells to find the integer solution of a,b,c
not enough information.
you have three unknowns to solve with one equation. unless there's more to this question, I don't think there is a unique solution.
All possible solutions
I see.
I get
2(a+b+c)=abc
Let a <= b <= c
How large can a be?
Oh wait do you want integer solutions or postive integer solutions?
I think the question means positive integer solutions
Yeah ok this is much easier
Can you answer this?
i mean probably if i use brute force
think about what happens if the fractions are too small
No need brute force
i dont get it
take a = 10, for instance.
do you see a solution fulfilling this?
Closed by @wise forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone pls help me understand goniometric inequations? my problem is when i have to pick the answer after i draw the circumference, like especially with 2nd grade equations i can give an example, im at a point ehere im left with •tanx<=-1 and tanx>=sqrt3/3, i draw the circumference but im just confused what the hell am i supposed to pick
,rccw
for future helpers, maybe: would it be fine if you posted the original question too?
Yep
yeah sorry
,rccw
maybe original, like the book this question came from?
it will help us understand how you got to this step.
hm, you are on the right approach.
if you know the graph of the tangent function, it would be easier to do this. are you allowed to graph?
like trying to get the solutions from y=tanx?
it wasnt how he taught it but im sure its fine
as long as the answer is correct
then you could try finding the base solutions by graphing tan(x) for 0 < x < 2pi first.
why 0 and 2pi specifically?
length of a period (though for tangent, you can technically get away with 0 < x < pi, since the period of the tangent function is pi radians).
Its the periodicity of tan
You have to convert it back to x and add the periodicity
like this?
Yeah
but in the inequation it would be x<=-pi/4+kpi and x>=pi/6+kpi wouldnt it
well, because of the period of tangent, we can rewrite -pi/4.
can you rewrite this to be positive?
the period of tangent is pi.
7/4
you can make this even smaller.
but if i did pi-teta wouldnt it be 2nd quadrant?
that's where the kpi comes in.
3/4*
mhm.
ok so uh
so what are your two inequalities now?
so id have x<3/4pi and x>pi/6
don't forget your equals.
yeah
but yes. can you now combine them into one inequality?
do i do like the graph like i did 2 years ago when i learnt ax^2+bx+c>0?
you don't have to. you're at the last step already.
(well, second last. there's one more step because you're dealing with tangents.)
good job. (don't forget the + kpi on both sides.)
wait is that it
now, there is one more step. because we are dealing with a tangent, we have one more restriction to consider.
right pi/2+kpi
that but adding the kpi and the x≠pi/2+kpi
so like
can i like ignore any graph and do the inequality with the graph like i wouldve did if there was no sin/cos/tan
sorry, what do you mean?
cus i did the quadratic formula and got tanx1=sqrt3/3 and tan2=-1
i know from the initial equation that a>0 and we have >
yeah, that's the correct strategy here.
so i know i do x<= the smaller one
and x>= the bigger one
i solve tanx<=-1 as if it were tanx=-1
I see your point, but isn't that what you've done here?
yeah but the teacher told us we have to look at the circumference to get the final value
but i domt see how that could make it any easier than what we did
I don't think that is necessary, but if your teacher forces you to use that method or you score no marks, then, well...
you don't exactly have a choice, do you.
he doesnt at least i dont think so
if the teacher allows other methods, then absolutely. I see this being a little more intuitive.
he always says do wtv u want as long as u get the right answer
then yeah, your method makes perfect sense. it's how I would have done it too.
my pleasure. is there anything else?
if not, please remember to close the channel.
Closed by @dawn narwhal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
That is absolutely amazing lmao
Thanks for pointing this out.
.close
Closed by @calm sierra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Right sorry for not tagging a mod
my apologies as well.
.We already got a ping so don't worry about it, you're fine
(cc @slender atlas)
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is dumb but from
x/x-1 - 1/x = 1/x-1
what is the common denominator?
$\frac{x}{x-1} - \frac{1}{x} = \frac{1}{x-1}$
This is sad 😢
yes
Alright so, I have a simpler question for you beforehand
Can you simplify this for me?\
$\frac27 + \frac{3}{11}$
This is sad 😢
I know how to find common denominators but i can't figure out how to find that one
7 is prime
11 is prime
yes i know
So you can simplify this right @formal crypt
Describe the process in which you do so
the least common denominator is 77 so i multiply 11 times 2 and 11 times 7
then i repeat with 7 on the other fraction
i get 22/77 + 21/77 = 43/77
Mhm
So in general
The common denominator of fractions $\frac{a}{b}$ and $\frac{c}{d}$ is $bd$ yes?
denzio321
yes
So we cycle back here
$\frac{x}{x-1} - \frac{1}{x} = \frac{1}{x-1}$
denzio321
Can you apply this
To this
x(x-1) right?
@formal crypt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @formal crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
bot
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
How to work on a standard quadratic equation
Is this what you're looking for?
What did you ask them?
The quadratic formula i have is
y= 3x^2 + 5x - 2
I need to fjnd the x intercepts
How do i do that? I was given the quadratic formula
How do i get the bot to work
!oringial
ididi
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Why do you need the bot to work?
This is sad 😢
So what have you tried?
Let me show u a oicture
Alright
whatd i get erong
Excuse my bad grammar ihave a phone and the meyboard is ass
the yellow part is supposed to be -2 not 2
it's alright
ohh
Ok let me rewrite the whole thing
Thank you
Can i work on my question than show u if its right
wait
comebakc im stuck
Yeah sure take your time
yes for sure
is it like this
the -24
Idk how to use iphone calculator its top tier ragebaiting
What's 25 -(-24)
looks good
Um so the negitive and negitive turns to a postive so is it 49
im stuck again whay do i do for the 2/6
should i shrink it to 1/3? or do smthing else
Yes that's one of your answers
oh so like i would seitch it up
Wait i rem doing this in grade 10 math let me try it
like this
Ts lowk so cool i rem doing this
guys whered u go💔
Ok so
now my friend shown me one way but i understand this way mor eeasier
Now i need to find the vertex
uhhh, what's the problem?
The vertex is the point where it has the lowest/highest value
honestly idk what the teacher means by the vertex
ohok wait let me showu what i need to learn
Are you familiar with differentiation yet
Ah cool I'll take that as a no
In that case you find vertex by completing the square
Do you know how to do that
8’ gna kms💔
Im in grade 11 math uni level prep Functions
if ts helps
canada to
so erm um
Is this a live test that you're doing right now?
WDYM
Caps sorry
This seems like im ragebaiting but idk how to use discord i only come for help with my classes
Is this a test, or is it homework or something?
Also please don't say that 
I have a math test right now so i skipped it to go study for math
Ok im sorry
I am studying my math work and i need help with the topics , i want to learn about the topics before i do my unit tests
Wait, you have a test for math, but you skipped the test to... study for the test?
yes
if only if only if onlyyyyy you knew my logic💔💔
Ok so i need to find what a vertex and stae the veryex is
Well, I'll take your word for it, for now 
Anyways you have this source here, does this help you a bit, comparing it to what you have in your question?
@idle epoch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i factor 2x^2-x-45=0
I js need help factoring quadratics with a coefficient on the x^2
$2x^2-x-45=0$
This is sad 😢
Alright, what have you tried?
Okay so i’ve tried multiply -45 by 2
And then divide it later
Although i had myselff guessing why i was wrong when i got x= -4.5 and x =5
Instead of x=4.5 and x=- 5
can't you just apply quadratic formula?
how did you get -4.5?
Factoring faster
I probably didnt turn x into -x
those are correct i think
I got the negatives flipped
,calc 2*5^2 - 5 - 45
Result:
0
I see
in that case, it seems like you were striving for sum of +1 while you should be going for sum of -1
your sum has to be the negative of coefficient of x
