#help-13
1 messages · Page 131 of 1
Yw
And if I have another problem like that
Always one answer will be invalid?
Ohhh so the other x is the possible answers that won't be
No
Right???
Check all the cases
I don't understand your question
Second case is invalid because x has to be less than -1 and greater than 2 at the same time
If a have idk let's say
4>x
And
-4<x
in my first answer
But
3>x
And -3<x
In the second
4 > x means x < 4
-4 < x means x > -4
so x is between -4 and 4
It doesn't have a hole between 4 and 3?
4 > x
-4 < x
3 > x
-3 < x
All the same question?
Yeah
x is between -3 and 3
That's the only answer?
That's the answer
Why not 4
You are welcome
Closed by @edgy heart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This exercise deals with a self-generating sequence. The sequence, ${\map a n}$, is defined by[
\map a n = n- a(a(n-1)) \textss{for} n \ge 1 \textss{and} \map a 0 = 0
]
I have to prove that $\map a n = \floor{(n+1)\mu}$ where $\ds \mu = \f{-1+\s 5}{2}$
\vs{3 mm}
So far, I have only discovered the fact that $\mu^2 = 1-\mu$ but am unable to proceed. Any hints would be appreciated!
(Asking this again because I couldn't keep up with yesterday's channel)
I'm still stuck and don't see the proper procedure of solving this
Holy shit, this is one of the questions I've seen today
My only guess is that induction should work
Where? Haha
Someone did suggest me doing it
But, hoooow 😅
You just get like
k+1-a(a(k))
Okay okay no worries
In the definition of a(n) is it defined as n - a of a(n-1) as in function of function?
yes
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
really not :(
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
your sequence has a name https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hofstadter_sequence#Hofstadter_G_sequence
reading through oeis, it seems to be related to fibonacci
(which makes sense because of the golden ratio mu)
oh wow thats crazy
also, I agree with this ^ (strong induction probably)
might need to show that a(n) is nondecreasing first tho
still dont see it easily enough
at least with that floor
we want to show $\lfloor (n+1)\mu \rfloor = n- \lfloor (\lfloor n\mu \rfloor +1 )\mu\rfloor$
Toby
uh wait
i thought it was the otheer way around?
huh?
as in show n-a(a(n-1)) = floor((n+1)mu)
yeah
then we can sub in a(n-1) via induction
to get this ^
(provided that a(n) is nondecreasing)
hmm okay 
yeah, I basically got stuck here and called quits
I tried taking [n mu] as k and proceeding but didn't help
if we get rid of all the floors, its true via mu^2=1-mu
but idk if we can retrieve the floor form from that
yeah but then again there's no property that allows to simplify that
only thing we can do is somehow bring the n out
lemme try again
can anyone help me solving my equation doubt basics pls
tune, get your own channel pls
.
like y?did I mean something bad?
you can find free channels in MATH HELP (AVAILABLE)
Nono the thing is there's already someone here who is asking a question
You take an empty room
Like
thank you and sorry
It's okay 👍
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Sorry for the afk guys
How does one
Get rid of floors?
Is there a... Floor inverse 😅
wave wand
idk if its valid to literally ignore all the floors
My math bender!
I'd assume the error would be a bit too large 
yeah
floors are really weird to work with
if my working is correct, I've reduced it to $\lfloor -\mu^2n+\mu\rfloor = -\lfloor \lfloor n\mu + 1\rfloor \mu\rfloor$
Toby
so we need to show that there is exactly one integer between the two floored things

$\implies \lfloor -\mu^2n+\mu\rfloor =\lceil-\lfloor n\mu + 1\rfloor \mu\rceil$
Toby
so $-\mu^2n+\mu \leq \lfloor \mu^2n-\mu\rfloor \leq \lfloor n\mu + 1\rfloor \mu$
Toby
i dont follow, how?
pulling the negative sign out flips floor/ceiling
wtf?
i actually
never knew that
HUUUUUUUH
,w -floor(x)==ceil(-x) reals
oops signs got f'd up
should mu^2n-mu on left
what is the proof of that
like
just curious
of this?
yes
I think looking at the definition is enough
hmmm? 
- changes max to min and swaps inequalities
this is really interesting ty
the more you know with toby 
but how do we use this now 
somethings not right
desmos giving us wrong things 
but we should bound the difference between upper and lower bound to be <1
which gives us "exactly one integer"
and then we would be done I think
but that requires me to be capable of arithmetic, and my brain power is not up for it atm
yeah i am still not up for it with this question LOL
i will message you tomorrow toby about this if possible
after i
try understanding what have u done a bit more 
but thanks a lot
.close
Closed by @stray spruce
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\int_{-1}^{0} w^3 \cdot 8^{w^2+1} , dw$
Daniel H.
I'm trying to solve this, but I can't find a method to use. Any recommendations?
Use a^b = e^(b log(a))
Pull out the 8^1 first though
?
Don't h8 it
FTFY
Just a silly joke I think
smh I haven't unlocked the Dad Joke Detection ability yet
.close
Closed by @timber dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do this
those are different names for the same function, it takes a value and gives you back an angle with that sin
oh then yes i have come across
ok, can you use that to find a value of theta that satisfies that equation?
yes i found the value of theta is that all ?
that will give you one answer but there's infinitely many solutions to that equation, and more than one in the range they ask for
okay i see so how do i calculate the other ones in that range provided
here's a picture of what you've got going on, can you tell me another angle that has the same sine?
im not sure
Hint there are 3 of them
i am missing it i am confusing myself i think
There's one in each quadrant
no there isn't, there's just one more angle on there that has the same sin
sin can be thought of as the height, which is why I've drawn it that way
I usually construct this view as the triangle and shapes have positive sides :/
in this case we're working with \sin\theta = -0.05
Mm
sin is negative in quad 3 aswell right is that what you are asking
I find that locating more roots is significantly easier with the graph
yes
do you see how you can go from one solution to many solutions?
ohhh i see
(i put that 2pi label in the wrong spot; that's 3pi)
There are actually 4 values 🙃
in the range we want (-pi to 4pi) there are 6 i think
yes 6
do you see how the graph has a lot of symmetries?
yes
Closed by @teal echo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what can I do to solve this integro-differential equation on wolfram?, I need to check my answer :c
If you differentiate it the integral disappears and you get a 3rd order diff eq
couldn't you differentiate both sides?
Then WA can most likely solve it with ease and you can check the answer
Also checking whether the answer is right shouldn't be that hard, should it ?
looks like you could do method of undetermined coefficients after differentiating
since you'll only have an exponential term on the right hand side
It's 6e^t - 4 so it's not just exponential
But the exercise is about using convolution
you're absolutely right on that. misread it
but, the integrate is with dx, how can it dissapear differentiate?
Though you can guess that the answer is of the form k e^t + some polynomial of degree at most 4
Fundamental theorem of calculus
FTC baby
Never forget
yes, but, my function is y'(t) = dy/dt, if I differentiate using dx what happens with that dy/dt, thay is my question
Are you asked to solve the differential equation in a normal way
Or using convolution
??
Using convolution
Then use Laplace transform on both sides
If you did things properly you'd quickly realize there is no problem here
Yes, I did it, I want to check if what I did is correct
Oh, I see, nice!
Also maybe change your role to something other than pre-university
What did you find?
Eeeh, I'm not from USA, so I'm not sure what role I have to choose, I'm from Colombia
looks like a problem from an ODE class, which is undergrad
y(t) = 3*cosh(t)[cosh(2t)-cosh(t)] + [e^-t(cosh(2t)-cosh(t))][-2t-3]
Undergrad -> bachelor's
Graduate -> master's
PhD student / doctorate -> phD

Oh my god
I did not expect that
either way, i don't think any of us want to grind through this calculation lol
too much trouble to look up laplace transform tables and then apply convolution
makes sense to check it with wolfram alpha
Maria, it's false unfortunately
You should not get any cosh
You should get exponentials
In the purple underline I need to solve the convolution first and then solve the integral?
You do not need any convolution to solve this differential equation
Only Laplace Transform
Find Y(s)
Then its inverse y(t)
Why is with exponential? :c the inverse laplace transform of L^-1 (s/s^2 - 1) is not cosh? :c
My teacher asked us to solved it using convolution
Yeah, but convolution in the time domain
is equivalent to multiplication in the s-domain
in the laplace domain
that's what we are doing here!
if I had a paper and pen next to me, I would solve it for you and show you
what is time domain?
Okay okay, never mind
Let's just apply the Laplace transform on both sides
y''(t) becomes s².Y(s) - s.y(0) - y'(0)
Right?
right
Yes correct, but I do not see any s²-4
s^3 + s² - 4s - 4 gives real roots
-1
2
and -2
(s+1)(s+2)(s-2)
So you will have c1.exp(-t) + c2.exp(2t) + c3.exp(-2t)
I'm talking about homogeneous solution
For the general solution, it's a long tedious process lol
@heady spindle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @heady spindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey, trying to find young`s modulus here but i get 200mpa (2/0.01=200) , what am i doing wrong
.close
Closed by @finite badger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain part b for me please
If it’s perpendicular go the plane
Would I use the vector product if the 2 direction vectors and find the normal to the plane and make that the direction vector if line l ?
@ me if you know pls
@nocturne field Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given f(x) = tan(x) and g(x) = sin(x). What is (f/g)(x). State the domain and range of the combined function
I see, so then, it can go till 1 / cosx?
this can be simplified :))
And for the Domain, I wrote:
D: { X|X =/ pi/2(n), n e R, x e Z
ah I'm sorry I didn't him typing 😂
ikr
there's not much going on, we're all eager to help lmao
scarcity pretty much
why do you have
x in Z
So it can go till 1/ cosx then
U have a point... it would make sense for n, not x
usually $n\in\mathbb{Z}$ and $x\in\mathbb{R}$
XxMrFancyu2xX
just use the fraction properties $\frac{1}{\cos\theta}=\sec\theta$
XxMrFancyu2xX
Wait whay
tanx/ sinx = sinx/cosx ÷ 1/sinx
Wait...
I think I made a mistake
Yeah it's 1/cosx
$\frac{\tan\theta}{\sin\theta}=\frac{\frac{\cancel{\sin\theta}}{\cos\theta}}{\cancel{\sin\theta}}$
XxMrFancyu2xX
As for the domain, there was sinx and cosx in the process, so would we just look at the simplified answer for the NPV?
Non-permissible value
because both sin and cosine are in denominators
check when both cosine =0 and sine =0
yes but when either of them are 0
Sinx is 0 at pi
I see
So if we add by pi/2 each time for the npv, we would be getting them
So then the domain is
D: {X in R| x =/ (pi/2)n, n in Z}?
yep! :))
As for the range
from this maybe consider using interval notation rather then set builder
you may find it easier 😅
Is it this:
Y: { y | y =/ 0, y in R}
y=1/2 is not in range 
To the real numbers
nope, there is not $\theta$ such $\sec\theta=0$
XxMrFancyu2xX
so 0 is not in the range
remember $\sec\theta=\frac{1}{\cos\theta}$ is $\cos$ has it's maximums at 1
XxMrFancyu2xX
It's undefined at pi/2
alright back up a little, cosine goes from [-1,1] right?
Yes
so the denominator goes from [-1,1] then of secant, yes?
@twin flax Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\int_{3}^{7} u(2u-5) , du$
Daniel H.
I have to solve using Riemann sums.
I already rewrite it as:
$\int_{3}^{7} 2u^2-5u , du$
Daniel H.
Did they specify to you how many sub-intervals?
To divide the interval [3,7] into sub-intervals
No, I usually have to create the limit to the infinite.
But I can't get the answer to be 382/3
Idk, but when I evaluate the limit it tends to the infinite and not to the right answer.
Maybe I was wrong somewhere, but I don't know where
Show us!
Here
Awww 🫠 thankss!
Also, right after that, you have -15 - 20i/n
You distribute the minus sign on both!
Not only the first
other than that, your work is awesome
try again with those slight changes
and check
Closed by @timber dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find the star height of [
(((((\vb 0^)\vb 1)^\vb0)^)\vb 1)^
]
Whats star height 
hmmm i get [
\max(\max(h(((\vb 0^),\vb 1)^), \map h{\vb 0}) + 1, 0) +1
]
but how the hell do you progress from that:
Wtf
lemme give the definition one sec
I am curious in this star operation too 

it's a recursive definition right? start with the innermost things and work your way out
ie h(0) = 0 because 0 is an alphabet symbol
@muted bear
that took you a while
Oh is this language math?
yes
yeah it just gets too messy idk
lemme try again
apply the last step recursively
you shouldn't have any max in there at all
there's basically nothing for you to do apart from the last thing
O.O ...oh
oh what so i have to try and eliminate the max's right?
okay hmm
no you shouldn't have any max in the first place, that should never show up
h(0) = 0, yes?
er

i mean ok intuitively i think the answer should be 4 but im not gonna be able to justify that formally without any work
4 seems right 
I need to read up on this math
how are you meant to evaulate it otherwise? like wouldn't you need to use this?
yeah you will
no, why would you need to use that?
those are two...very different answers 😅
you will need it to split the expression
you don't have any concatenation or unioning in that regular expression
(0*)1 is (0*) followed by 1
max(x, 0) = x is also useful here
Forgive me if I'm wrong as I just learned this off a wikipedia page 5 seconds ago and what you're saying here but is h(0*)=1 then?
that's correct
Ok then I understand all this now neat! Have no idea what it's used for tho xD
oh okay i think i got it all down to max's
formal languages, pattern matching, linguistic pedantry
I think AMS had an article on this this month, or featured book I've been meaning to look into it
i have [
\max(\max(\max(1, 0)+1,0)+1,0)+1
]
looks right to me, now time to pretend to be a computer and evaluate it
use this wisely
becomes [
\max(\max(2,0)+1,0)+1\
\max(3,0)+1
]
Based off this wouldn't the first inner term be the max(h(0*),h(1))=max(1,0)?
dw about it u will never use this probably
im just obsessed with discrete shit 
Ahh yeah you have that just erased the h
i did it in-and-out basically
though i dont think it matters
anyways tysm @slate lintel and sir snow sir

Hmm wait

Logically
We have four *'s and everything is 0 otherwise
Hence you coulda looked at this and said 4 from the getgo
Since everything else involved is a normal letter
specifically four nested *s
Yeah
At each step you're deciding between the star of the previous thing or something with value 0
wait guys
follow up question
wait uhh
maybe i should reopen so people dont get lost
.close
Closed by @stray spruce
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
What exactly do you not understand?
I see
Okay so the thing is first of all we need to understand what we're working with here
Or rather how this is constructed
First there are 4 points M,N,P,Q
yep
which are connected so that MP is orthogonal to NQ, orthogonal meaning the angle between the lines is 90°
oh right
i dont know what orthogonal means but i searcehd it up
we didn't take it
i'm year 10/grade 9
Ok do you want me to give you some more examples on that?
you can do it
brio
if you help me get through this geometry
i will pay you 200$
not even messing around
even if you would i wont take it
we'll see lol
anyways
so back to the example
i just dont undersatnd like
the reasons of why
like why is AD parallel to BC
orthogonal
which would be the 90 degrees
right
right
it doesnt matter
so
i apply this theory
to find the answer?
not really
so what's this used for then
So the thing is in this case that you can just look at it and know whats going on. this might not be true for all cases however
Anywys
Lets talk about AD being parallel to BC because here our orthogonality will become important
yeha
As MP and QN are orthogonal, the triangle enclosed by M, N and the intersect between MP and QN, lets call it X, is the same triangle as the triangle betwenn M, Q and X
yeah
This is what I mean with X
right
Same goes for the Triangle NPX and PQX
Meaning that the midpoints A and D as well as B and C must be equal
So AD = BC
i get it now
tysm
ill use this theorem
and ill apply it to anything i dont understannd
because the object is orthogonal AD and BC must be parallel to one another
yeah
Because if they weren't MP and NQ wouldn't be orthogonal
ye
ok
how do i close this lol
Closed by @minor bear
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi so I would like to check if I've done this question correctly
I'll send my solution after I'm done doing it brb
ok, waiting
you could've opened your channel when you finished your solution 
Result:
42.5
did you maybe mean to ask "can you guys spot the mistake, if any?"
"can you spot the mistake" implies you know for certain there is at least one mistake
so are there any mistakes
there don't seem to be, except for the awful decimals
why not write (-1/2)^8 as 1/256..?
I mean yeah I agree it could be simplified but the way *
I did it is not wrong right?
I kept the decimals to minimise the room for mistakes because I got a differenct answer the first time I did it
i think decimals will NOT minimize room for mistakes
is it because there is a chance I will write the decimals wrong?
or something else
also, separate question, which one is correct
.close
Closed by @merry heath
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question related to Stats
Is this how coefficient of determination (R^2) is calculated?
<@&286206848099549185>
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @eager tusk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me understand where the 1/T normalising factor goes when taking the limit of the fourier series to turn into a fourier transform
there exists a derivation from fourier series to transform but what they do in it is derive the inverse fourier transform and they take the fourier transform as the definition
i cant find anyone showing the fourier transform as a direct consequence of extending the periodicity to infinity and the "disappearance" of the normalising 1/T factor
@sleek saddle Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@sleek saddle Has your question been resolved?
Can you write out exactly what math you're implying
the fourier transform
Yes you mentioned that
I'm asking for exact formulas
there exists a derivation from fourier series to transform
Show this resource you're talking about
this i will show
ok so this is the question
In physics and mathematics, the Fourier transform (FT) is a transform that converts a function into a form that describes the frequencies present in the original function. The output of the transform is a complex-valued function of frequency. The term Fourier transform refers to both this complex-valued function and the mathematical operation. ...
@sleek saddle Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
You need a little distribution theory to prove it rigorously, but that's essentially the idea
Closed by @sleek saddle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thanks for the help
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
suppose you are using the finite difference method to solve a PDE
and you are able to write it as a system of linear ODEs
like this
with your original PDE being
with the w vector being (del p)/ (del t) values
how do i find the values of (del p)/ (del t)
this might be a stupid question
but how do i find the value of $\frac{\partial p}{\partial t}$ for lets say p = 2 and t = 2
heavy
@red pumice Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @red pumice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do these problems?
recall that complex roots of real polynomials come in conjugate pairs
^ Consider reviewing the fundamental theorem of algebra to get a better, general idea too
Closed by @zinc stag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@fierce hound
Ah you’ve made progress. Good job man
Probably shouldn’t ping specific people unless you know the are fine with it tho
this guy told me to ask the verus dude he said he knows all about this
I found out that i have to put the details of the tiger too
So like the skin lines and colours
Get the general outline of it done first
For the stripes maybe you can get away with a single line cause you can change the thickness to make it bigger
Alright
Do u know what i got to change in the second equation to get the second ear
I feel like i can finish the whole left side but idk about the right side
Cause i can’t rotate it
You can try and use the same equation
But change to domain more left
So you get the left curve more
Also make the curve thinner
You could the the right ear with a quadratic facing down (negative) like an upside down u
Then join it with just the right side of a quadratic facing up
@halcyon spire Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello math flows, got a question about number theory, here is the question
The solution by textbook is a burtforce mode, checking all values of set S to tell if result is an even or odd
I'm wonder if there is better solution for that? here is my attempt, but I'm stuck at last part
I think my solution is not completed, any suggestion how may I come up with a conclusion to include those 3, and 4 values?! sorry I'm not smart
(6 calculations is small enough for brutforce to be a good solution)
one of n or n+1 must be divisible by 4
(follows from coprimality)
Yes I was thinking of that, so can I say
I dont like your notation
I think $8\mid n^2(n+1)^2 \implies 4\mid n \text{ or } 4\mid (n+1)$ is more clear
Toby
Oh, sorry may I should have used ∨(OR) instead edit: ∨.
yeah, be explicit that its 'or' and not 'and'
Awesome, yes, and one last question, about 4|n, and 4|(n+1) parts, proofing is required?
you could add some explanation
it follows directly from coprimality
you should have some sort of theorem/definition to help you
Thank you so much sir for your great help, explanation, and your time. Math bless us all
.close
Closed by @viral fox
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I need some help with this please. I'm trying to solve it with Divergence theorem but I cant find my variable change
I only see the definition of a function from R^3 to R^3, with the definition by cartesian equation of a certain plane S
There is nothing to be solved here
?
I have to use divergence to solve find the flow from F to the outside
maybe i'm translating something wrong
It's in spanish, so I tried translating it with google
@rich flint Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the given function f(x)=2x²+3x For what values of the variable x we have: f'(x) = f(x)
Closed by @slender dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so basicly i dont know what the tensor product is
i know that u can reconstruct the tensor from its components and the basis like so
okay so my question is, how would u reconstruct the tensor from its components and the basis using the tensor product
or if that question makes any sense
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
like a put option?
yes
why 41.7
thats wrong
41.7
Closed by @icy anchor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what formula should I use to solve this?
remind yourself what the cross product can tell you geometrically
@marsh pond Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.Ask
.close
Closed by @quasi jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone make any sense of part b? I just cannot understand what they have done...
@upbeat comet Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@upbeat comet Has your question been resolved?
@upbeat comet Has your question been resolved?
just take the limit from the left and right side of 0
and compare the two, their will be a 'hole' and you can say that the partial derivative of dg/dx and dg/dy doesn't exist at that point
I don't understand why they are introducing h & k in the third line of their answer for b
@upbeat comet Has your question been resolved?
@upbeat comet Has your question been resolved?
The same as you introduce h for the limit approach in 1 dimensional differentiation
This time you dont approach in 1d but in 2d
@upbeat comet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey math friends
I need some help interpreting this question
Would it be fair to assume that the function I'm being asked to use is sqrt(x + y)?
yep
And I'm using the linear approximation formula...
Awesome. Alright, let me try this
.close
Closed by @old monolith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why does $Σn - 2^i$ equal to $Σn - Σ2^i$?
Willow
this notation feels imprecise
do you mean
$$\sum_{i=1}^n (n - 2^i) \overset?= \sum_{i=1}^n n - \sum_{i=1}^n 2^i$$ maybe?
Ann (glomed)
let me watch the video
you can just watch the portion I linked, I think
right ok
you probably understand the rest already
this is a more general thing
$\sum_{i=m}^n (a_i + b_i) = \sum_{i=m}^n a_i + \sum_{i=m}^n b_i$
Ann (glomed)
a 'small' example of this would be:
(a_1 + b_1) + (a_2 + b_2) + (a_3 + b_3) = (a_1 + a_2 + a_3) + (b_1 + b_2 + b_3)
It's actually this: $Σ(n - 2^i)$
Willow
?
...yes? like you are still dealing with a single summation being split into two, the guy was just a tiny bit sloppy notation-wise in not putting parentheses around the summand
Closed by @scarlet ginkgo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
and thank you
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i find the domain for this algebraically?
What is the domain of the logarithm function
it's asking you to find the natural domain
Can't say I've ever heard of that do you have a definition
Otherwise I can only assume its the domain? Perhaps the domain restricted to $\mathbb{N}$?
KB0
question 22.2
or maybe the biggest possible domain
i think it's just asking what x values could this function accept
sounds more like it
Right, so what is the domain of log?
Sure
It's definitely not always >0 else you broke cubics
Okay so you seem to be almost there
oh but isn't a log graph assumed to have a positive base?
We just need to put your statements together
that's what the function looks like
The base of the log won't matter
yeah like idk what to do with those inequalities
like for log_3(x) = y, x>0 because 3^y = x and 3 to the power of anything has to be positive, right?
what do u mean?
Less than 0
yeah
Then what, necessarily, happens to the bracket with the degree 2 term?
Looking at the x bounds you have
I mean the bracket (x^2 -9), if that was unclear
oh so $$x>-4$$ AND $$x^2-9>0$$?
choufleur ❦
Well, ultimately, the thing on the inside (the factorised cubic) is always going to be defined right? It's domain is all of R you agree?
yeah
So the only way we can make this function not be defined, I.e. not have domain which is all of R, is due to the 'log' part
Because log is only defined for positive inputs
So the question is asking when the whole inside is positive
Which you can deduce from the inequalities you have
For example, if x<-4 as before, then it's definitely also <-3, so x^2-9 >0, but x+4<0, so the inside is negative... uh oh!
And from your plot you can see, the function is not defined after -4 and has an asymptote at -4
wait i'm still confused on this step
so x^2-9 >0
how did you conclude this
Well, we've picked x to be something less than -4, say, -5 (for example)
But now we've picked x
This is a function of one variablr
We can't have 'another' x
And you deduced yourself that x^2-9 >0 when x<-3
In particular this would be true for this chosen x=-5
oh ok yep
Maybe it's good for you to try to either convince me or yourself of why the function isn't defined between -3 and 3?
wait if i originally said that x+4>0 then how does it change to being less than 0??
You haven't permanently fixed x, you've said that in order to look at where the sign changes for the function on the inside
The fundamental observation is that if (x+4)(x^2-9)<0, then the function is not defined
i think it's because
if -3<x<3 then x^2-9 will be negative
and then x+4 would have to be positive because x<-4
so in the log function, there's pos x neg = neg which doesn't work
Yeah, your justification is correct
but i don't know how to get the asymptote at x=-4, and why it doesn't have a graph from x<-4
i think i'm kinda stuck on what i do with all the inequalities once i get them? like how do i know which bits don't work
It really is a casewise thing, you have three inequalities right? I would always start by checking the weakest bound, which in this case is x<-4
Then move in
so would i basically have to check these parts (non-purple)
like treat the values that i get as "reference points" and check in the intervals to see if it works?
@cunning loom
Yes that is absolutely what to do, you find some 'reference points' dictated by the particular functions in the question, and check around them to figure out whether functions are defined there
ohhhhhhhh ok thank you so much 🙇♀️ ✨ KB0
No worries! Feel free to come back if you have more questions.
@harsh plaza Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @harsh plaza
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is the inequality answee
first off consider how the region is being bounded by the x-axis and the parabola
this gives the y inequalities
but u know what i mean
my answer would be to solve the inercepts
and thats my inequality region
but thats incorrect in the answer
$−2≤x≤2 and 0≤y≤4−x^2$
wizrdhndrxx
your bounds are giving you a different region
think about it, you are refering to anything betwen 0 and 4 in the y-axis
but the area shadowed is more specific than that
so why can i do -2<x<2?
because you take x from -2 to 2, and for those given x you evaluate the function and get the area betwen the function and 0 (the x-axis)
Closed by @limber stone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m confused on how you do the notations. How do you do the set notation, interval notation and inequality notation? And what does IR mean?
,rccw
Set notation looks like this {}
Interval notation looks like this (a,b]
Inequality notation looks like this 3<x<=80






