#help-10
1 messages · Page 421 of 1
that lets you "cancel the powers"
here we "cancelled the base"
i.e. we went from 3^(3x+1) = 3^(2x) to 3x+1 = 2x
so it's one to one because? Sorry I'm pretty slow
I'm saying that we can do the cancelling because f(x) = 3^x is one-to-one
Ohhh
wait but why 😭 how do you consider something one-to-one again? Sorry it's just our teacher focused on solving more and she didn't tackle on this one that much
one-to-one means f(x_1) = f(x_2) implies x_1 = x_2
we use that here with x_1 = 3x+1 and x_2 = 2x
ohh
Ohhhhhh Thanks!
I at least understood it now I just hope I remember... Considering how our gen bio that consists of 1000 things to remember I'll probably forget abt this 😭
Anyways thank u so much ((: Have a wonderful day!
.close
Closed by @left mesa
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Proof by induction: 2^n>n^2 for all integer n greater than 4
This is the inductive step of the proof
I'm having trouble understanding why (n-1)^2 is used. And what exactly are the first and second inequalities here?
I think you have a typo
oh
2n > n^2 is false
yeah
sorry i changed it
i just took it from stackexchange
still having trouble with understanding what they did
Proof by induction: 2^n>n^2 for all integer n greater than 4
ah got it
that is the problem statement
i suspect that when putting the proof together, they started with 2n^2 > (n+1)^2 and worked their way backward, and found that it reduced to (n-1)^2 > 2
that's usually what happened when someone pulls a fact out of the air like that
can you explain this
this is what i pieced so far for what they meant for inequality 2
in the highlighted line, they claimed that 2n^2 > (n+1)^2 for n >= 5
since it's not obvious why that is true, they need to provide a proof
they probably started with 2n^2 > (n+1)^2 and rearranged it to get (n-1)^2 > 2
and said aha, but that is true
then when they wrote the proof, they did it in the reverse order
i'll probably take a minute to process this and then reply to you
ok now i am confused as to where did 2*n^2 come from because
I am looking at it from this inductive step
and how did he get that whole inequality to equal 2^(n+1)
is he assuming that 2* 2^n> 2*n^2 as 2^n >n^2?
In that case it does make sense
but why is there an equal sign
that makes no sense
oh
nvm
i think i got it now
yea that should be the least controversial part haha
it's very confusing to wrap my head around this
it's not a very clearly written proof
can you show me how they reduced it to to (n-1)^2>2 or provide some insight
like how did they come up with (n-1)
just reverse these steps:
i.e. start with the last line and do the opposite manipulations
all four lines are equivalent
@thorn marsh Has your question been resolved?
yes
Closed by @thorn marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this correct
Light
$x* -2e^{-2x} + e^{-2x}*1$ isnt that what i did
Light
can i remove e^-2x
i dont think i can
so thats just it right
oh ok
,w diff of ln(xe^(-2x)
,w diff of ln(xe^(-2x))
Closed by @sinful falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Closed by @sinful falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is derivative of that first part
my last part
is that righ
im nots rue
obut i think im right
derivative of arscosine is negative of 1/sqrt{1-{thing}^2}
thought it was this
yeah
hea so i took derivative which is 1/2sqrtx
and then over that
which is sqrt 1- sqrtx^2
Closed by @sinful falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
find derivative of $e^{sin^-1(z^2)}$
Light
am i righ
how the heck that extra "e" came to existence?
the way you factored out that "e" is scary tbh'
it would just be 2e right
here
i wil show
huh?
$\frac{d(e^{f(x)})}{dx}=f'(x)e^{f(x)}$
Closed by @sinful falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thank u
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help figuring out how to solve these
If anyone helps can you @me?
Give a number or letter you wanna solve first
2
@quiet plover Has your question been resolved?
Read about parallel line angle theorems, ive attached a page that discusses some which I assume are all that are needed for your questions. https://thirdspacelearning.com/us/math-resources/topic-guides/geometry/corresponding-angles/
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This type of questions, here to proceed i squared both of the sides( sinalpha + sinbeta + singamma )^2 = 0 then i'm stuck, How do i use the x= cosalpha + i sinalpha
Which part are you workkng on?
Did you try double angle identity?
Yes and then i squared the given equations, but how do i proceed
we do the sin^2 terms and cos^2 terms, but 2(sinalphasinbeta+ ... )
Can you do me a favor and write it expanded from the identity
Don't do any additional algebra just invoke the double angle one
You mean like
cos^2 alpha - sin^2 alpha + cos^2 beta - sin^2 beta + cos^2gamma - sin^2 gamma?
Yea
I'm using laptop is it okay if i just type?
It's fine I'll try to see it in a sec
okayy
I'm out rn hard for me to think about it
Oh
( sin alpha + sin beta + sin gamma)^2 = 0 (1)
sin^2 alpha + sin^2 beta + sin^2 gamma + 2(sinalphasingamma + sinalphasinbeta + sinbetasingamma) = 0
( cos alpha + cos beta + cos gamma)^2 = 0 - (2)
cos^2 alpha + cos^2 beta + cos^2 gamma + 2(cosalphacosgamma +cosalphacosbeta + cosbetacosgamma) = 0
subtracting 2 from 1
cos^2 alpha - sin^2alpha + cos^2beta - sin^2beta + cos^2 gamma - sin^2gamma +2 ( cosalphacosgamma +cosalphacosbeta + cosbetacosgamma - ( sinalphasingamma + sinalphasinbeta + sinbetasingamma ) = 0
@hidden river Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i know the volume is 2970meters cubed, just dont understand the second part
demn
.close
Closed by @final light
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
$\log_2(5) - 3\log_2(a) + \frac{7}{3}\log_2(9)$
Is this the question?
it’s supposed to have 5
she stole the question from someone else
Ohk
What is your answer?
knief
Log2(-5xa^3x9^(7/3))
please don’t use x for multiplication
Use * or •
Yeah
log2(-10935*a^3)
No minus
No
Log of negative numbers isn't defined
$\log(a) - \log(b) = \log(\frac{a}{b})$
knief
ohhhh
Similarly for addition it's *
,w 9^(7/3)
2187?
,w log_3 2187
,w 3^7
Nice
Nice
no
How do I do it??????
7/3 log_2(9) becomes?
yup
ty guyss
what’s your final answer
168.49*x^3
@dark agate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
e
Is the theorem able to have wlog because proving for y=2k is the same thing as
proving for x right
gotcha
ty
.close
Closed by @cunning parrot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ooo
similar triangles
but d = 2r
h = 4r
so r = ..
put that here
or h^3 / 16
knief
that's simpler
smeagol
smeagol
Yay that's what I was supposed to get :)
ty!
somehow in my previous attempt I got
16/45pi
dv/dt and dh/dt*
you’re welcome
just make sure to write dv/dt and dh/dt
not just dv and dh
gotcha
(because I did 2r = h instead of 4r = h)
.close
Closed by @near saddle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what do you need help with
what have you solved so far
Nothing 🙂
I can't solve this problem so i need help
Yes all the problem
ok well
when you divide a fraction by another number
that dividend comes up and gets multipled
so in the case of 544 you can bring it up to multiply with (6/11+2)
from there onwards just use pemdas/bodmas/bidmas whatever it is you use
sorry i mean divisor
you can convert 2 into 22/11
and then add
then multiply the 544
in the numerator
and then multiply the 10/816 to the -6/11
add (28/11)544 to the product
and then you'll get a new denominator
btw do this with the numerator you already have
and then multiply the new denominator to the numerator you already have
im sure you could also just simplify
Thanks bro 🙏🙏
np
.close
Closed by @south star
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$A,B,C \subset E \$Prove $A\Delta B=A\Delta C \iff B=C$
what does delta mean here ?
Adam Ch.
what does the sign delta mean in the question
scalar product ?
oh a logic problem
@fierce vale Has your question been resolved?
@fierce vale Has your question been resolved?
@fierce vale Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @fierce vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
My brain is fried, simple thing tho
4 whole numbers must equal 140
- numbers 1-8, one time use
(multiply only)
hint: 140 = 20 x 7
Closed by @arctic sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@bronze flame Has your question been resolved?
@bronze flame Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @bronze flame
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let f(x)=x^3+x+1. Suppose g is a cubic polynomial such that g(0)=-1, and the roots of g are the squares of the roots of f. Find g(4)
I can't find a good approach to this problem
I think that if I figure out the first step I can do the rest, any ideas?
@fleet dock Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@fleet dock Has your question been resolved?
@fleet dock Has your question been resolved?
@fleet dock Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i have some help with 20b i keep on getting y=7
Closed by @vital verge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I get better at 3D trigonometry just the basic stuff with the sine and cosine rules etc.
<@&286206848099549185>
3d and trigonometry?
Anyway what I can tell you is simple. Noone can make you better at anything, only you can do that. Just keep practicing that's the cure.
Yeah I mean where do I practice
You must have questions in your books right?
I'm relatively good at maths compared to my year group anyway I just feel like I want extra practise
yeah I was thinking something more on the digital side
You always need practice dude dont think you are good at maths. Maths is never ending.
Use books
Yeah that's why I'm here
Well alright then
Thanks
@lime venture Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lime venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
found the domain is [-4,2) union (2,4]
but how would i determine the rnage of it
little confused
you can differentiate the function to find the maximum and minimum
that is one way
another way is to do it intuitively
another way is to do it graphically by plotting it and seeing where the value is maximum and minimum
,w plot y = (sqrt{16 - x^2} / (x-2))
it doesn;'t seem like this function has any specific maximum or minimum
look at the points of discontinuity ig
wait is my domain answer right
this
yup yup
alright
at -4 the value of the function is 0, and it will decrease after it
because sqrt(16-x^2) is gonna be always positive
yep that's how i got my domain
and x - 2 is gonna be negative for x around -4
range looks like il just have to do it intuitively
yeah
next point of discontinuity is 2
at that point, the function jumps from -infinity to infinity
and then the last one is 4
where it's 0 again
so it's gonna look approximately like this
very approximately
(you could also make a trig sub to figure out the range, imo it'll be a bit easier to transform this function into something that know the range of than analysing the function in its base form)
@wintry lark Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wintry lark
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm not sure if this is the right channel to ask in, but I wanted to ask if someone would be willing to explain to me what the XOR operation does and how it's defined inside of Set notation? I'm a little lost
In bitwise arithmetic, I understand what XOR does, but I have no idea if that carries over to the topic of sets.
like if you perform S OR T, it returns all elements in S or in T but not both
ren
XOR returns all elements such that they are in either S or T but not both
Closed by @fierce ice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got 14x-1 for 15, which sounds right but this is such a weird question
it's just an irregular one
And then share each side length?
i'm going to be honest, i haven't done this in awhile
Like ABCDE

i have no clue 😞
I am saying something just like this
(tu ru ru tu ru ru)
not that i can remember
@violet yarrow ?
i do
this just made so much more sense 😭
glad to hear that
you would add 5x-3 + 3x, giving you 8x-3,no?
Yes!
yay!
8x-3+3x+2x+4x+2
there's one more side left
for now
it would be another 4x+2
i split it
ignore the 3x, i erased it
Yes!!
so then just add the other 4x+2 and 2x?
Correct!!
okay!
oh you also forget the 5x-3 side
it would 28x-2
okay! so area is a=w•l
yes, this is the equation for rectangle
for the perimeter what would be the width?
try spliting the shape to small rectangles first
so 6x+6x+2x+2x
i don't understand
For example, you could split it like this
@violet yarrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
anyone got any pointers on how to solve this?
i'd start by converting 0,2 and 0,04 to fractions
if not, where should i start?
.close
Closed by @hard imp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So I have a type of questions saying
[Translation] find a generic (/general) term of numerical sequence {x_k}, which is defined
x_1 = A
x_(k+1) = B*x_k+C
(A B C depend on the problem but they're integer constants)
And calculate their sum, s_k, of terms from 1, to k.
I don't really know how to go about solving it
I didn't really do well in a school so I'm trying again but it's really hard
@left lotus Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> hii
What does that even mean
I didn't specify A B and C but the answer turns out to be a constant?
.reopen
Try summing the equation on both the sides from k=1 to k=n
Wait, whats about the first question of finding a generic term?
Oh ok I misunderstood and thought that was a translation problem
But yes you'd need that too to solve the s_k
It means we have to find x_k in terms of A,B and C (and k)
Oh translation means I translated it from my native language
x_1 is A,
x_2 is BA + C
x_3 is B(BA + C) + C
= BBA + BC + C
x_4 is B(BBA + BC + C) + C
= BBBA + BBC + BC + C
So, um let me think
Do we use Σ? Like
k-1
Σ B^n
n=0
Then multiply that by C, and add B^k * A?
Umm but it mismatches if I put k=4
Yes we use summation
Separate the first term from the rest and then see if you can see any pattern
First term is easy to guess for x_k I think
Do you know sum of a geometric series?
Like C + CB + CB^2 + CB^3 + ... CB^(n-1) = ?
are you asking if I can write it with sigma?
Hmm?
Ok do you have any idea of
There is a shorter way to write it?
What would be the sum of 1 + 3 + 9 + 27 + ... upto 10 terms?
I think I got it, let me write it down
Yes, it solves out to a single short formula
In base 3, it would be
1, 10, 100, 1000
Then adding them results in
1111
Add one more 0 to the biggest term
10000 then subtract 1
So it's 2222, divide by 2 and it's the answer
It's embarrassing if it's wrong :p
For base b, sum up to k is
(b^(k+1) - 1)/(b-1)
Oh thats a rather cute / unique way to do it XD
But yes!
That formula is right
Except
For 1 + b + b^2 + ... b^(k-1) = (b^(k) - 1)/(b-1)
Ok!!
ok now do you have any idea for how you can simplify this?
For k = 4, I can separate to BBBA and BBC + BC + C, then bring C to the back (BB + B + 1)*C
Then it's just what I did earlier
The biggest exponent is 2 (= k-2)
(B^(k-2+1)-1)/(B-1)*C
The first part is A*(B^(k-1))
So the sum is (B^(k-1)-1)/(B-1)*C + (B^(k-1))*A ?
Yesss
Except I don't get why you wrote it like (B^(k-2+1)-1)/(B-1)*C
There are n = k-1 terms and the formula puts the n as the exponent so u can directly write it like k-1
But maybe you meant it like the highest term exponent (B^2 = 2) + 1 = 3
I just used this one
Here k is the biggest exponent
That's wrong tho
Notice how there's k here
I'm talking about 1 + b + b^2 + .. b^(k-1) aka k terms
Maybe you're talking about k + 1 terms like 1+b+b^2+...+b^k ??
Because your final answer here is correct
Oh sorry I named the variable k too
For k terms highest exponent is k-1 so your k-1 corresponds to my k
Oki
But I think I got the main idea!
Yupp
So you already found the x_k
Now try summing the equation on both the sides for k=1 to k=n and you'll find s_n
It's getting late so I'll do it in tomorrow (actually todays) morning
Nice help <3 I appreciate your kindness
But I'm just happy I've made some progress
.close
Closed by @left lotus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
I have a question about vectors.
Assume we have two vectors:
u = (1;1;1)
and vector v
I want v to be parrallel and equal to vector u but not on the same line.
What do I need to have?
wdym not on the same line ?
also for vectors we do not say parallel we say colinear
it means the points of the vector are not on the same,
like AB and CD are two vectors that have to be colinear and equal
not on the same what ?
Suppose we have a line AB,
and we have another line CD
They need to be equal and colinear
well
if you want to find a parallel vector that is not equal
you can multiply the three coordinates by a same number
for ex if you have v(1,1,1) ; u(2,2,2) is colinear but with unequal coordinates
idk if that is what you are asking for
but their length is not equal
they need to be equal
vector AB has to be equal to vector CD
wdyouwant then
then they are the same vector
if vector AB = vector CD then the vector is the same
a vector is not static
so how do I find it?
I have vector u(1,1,1)
how do I find vector v that's equal and colinear to vector u?
it can only be u then lol
<@&286206848099549185>
listen to me
if the vectors have the same coordinates then they are the same vector
@hot hazel
Please do not ping individual users for math help
The response you've already gotten is correct in any case
Formally vectors have no "placement" on the plane; by convention we often position them at the origin
But we could place them anywhere
And they'd be the same vector
but say I want a vector that is equal in length and colinear to another vector
how would I find it?
It's the same vector
Idk what else to say
Those two conditions imply the vectors are equal
there's only one vector on a plane that has the same length and is colinear to a vector?
Oh I guess you could have a collinear vector in the opposite direction
Like (1, 1) vs (-1, -1)
Closed by @bleak chasm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
There were 48 students from different classes. 6 of them had 1 friend from their class, 9 of them had 2 friends from their class, 4 of them had 3 friends from their class and the rest didn't have any friends from their classes. How many classes were there?
is this an actual problem or did you like find this from tiktok and want an answer

I mean it is a problem in combinatorics techincally
Let me solve it
So if 6 of them had a friend form their class that means there was 3 pairs of people from same class
/shrug
I agree with this
The rest i.e. 48-6-9-4=29 were solo
So 29+4+3+1=37 classes
But looks like some tiktok fr
Or instagram reels
Answer is sus
@opaque mesa Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could anyone check if those derivatives are correct please ? 🙏
@fossil raven Has your question been resolved?
@fossil raven Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was finding the gradient of F to get the normal vector and everything was right except the Z part of the gradient, which apparently is -1. Can someone explain why that is? I checked the answer and apparently we subtract z in the original equation?
@flat shell Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you do this one?
Do you know the formula for the derivative of the inverse function at point x?
(f-1)'(x) = 1/f'(f-1(x))
well is there even an inverse?
I think the inverse of this function is a little annoying though right?
you don't even need the inverse
if you have a point (x,y) on the graph f
dont find the inverse
f^-1(y) = ?
oh
@plain tiger Has your question been resolved?
@plain tiger Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @plain tiger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don’t need an answer I just wanna know what type of math is this and does anyone recognize it
It's just the graph properties of x^n and -x^n
How does it work?
So you know if you square a number it's always positive, yes?
Yea
That works for every even power
And odd is negative?
thats why it says that for x^n (even) the graph is only above Ox (the result is always positive)
Odd powers dont change the sign
- * - = +
and if you multiply it again with a minus you get a minus back
It's just a game of signs
Closed by @idle patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is 17 false?
it makes intuitive sense
because if they have the same vector field
then at each point on that vector field the derivates must equal each other
meaning that the two systems would need to be equal
and 18 would be true since it does take into account the magnitude?
@bitter terrace Has your question been resolved?
@bitter terrace Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
quick question on rationalizing denominators
lets say for example i have a cube root in the denominator, could i multiply it by that expression squared to rationalize the denominator
Sounds like it could work. Have you tried it?
not yet
Maybe you could try it for yourself :)
,rotate
Does that seem right?
I was gonna show that they're not equal by plugging in t=0 but they have the same value at zero 😂
,rotate
t=7 gives 2/6 from the first expression
t=7 gives 4/6 from the second expression
so something's wrong
How to I rationalize the cube roots?
Your issue is that a cube root would need to be multiplied by itself three times to give back what's inside
so cbrt(t+1) * cbrt(t+1) is not sufficient to give t+1
i understand but how do i multiply a cube root by itself 3 times
you could do what you did here but do it twice
why twice?
at first there's one lonely little root
then you give the root a friend
then you give it another friend
so if it was an expression raised to 1/4 and i wanted to rationalize the denominator i would multiply it by itself 3 times?
sounds like it could work
There's also a shorthand for multiplying it three times
you can multiply by the third power of whatever you want to multiply three times
@eternal monolith Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @eternal monolith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
allo
are t and n both variables?
yes
alrighty, what have you tried
i tried the quotient rule
you can do that though i dont think its the most efficient
and i also tried splitting the nominator and demominator then using product rule on the bottom
whats the most effecient way?
how can you use them both?
well, youre first using the chain rule
but youll have a (t^4 * n)' which needs the product rule
shouldnt you distribute the power to whats inside the brackets then use power rule for each one?
even if you distribute the exponent it still needs the product rule
t^(-12) * n^(-3)
every single time i have a variable times a variable i MUST use product rule?
yeah, essentially
t^(-12) * n^(-3) so i just use product rule on this and thats it?
yup
in that case chain rule wasnt necessary right?
youre still technically going to be using it
since we're diff with respect to x
so eg n^(-3) goes to -3n^(-4) dn/dx
chain rule
these technichalities confuse me
i just use product rule right?
whatever technicly comes let it come
we usually call this implicit differentiation, but it is just the chain rule
how is this implicit when implicit is when we differentiate with respect to a variable thats inside the finction and we just add a derivative multiplier of it next to its normal version
this is implicit differentiation, and implicit differentiation is just the chain rule
eg if i have y^2, my outer function is u^2, my inner is v=y
so i do v' * u' which is dy/dx * 2u = dy/dx * 2y
its the chain rule, youre just not thinking of it as doing the chain rule
alright
well like i said lets keep it uncomplicated
i basicly just
remove the division by making the power 3 a negative
then distributing it to remove the brackets
then use the product rule
all done?
yeah, its a valid approach
if i write that in the final exam it will be correct?
Closed by @bold junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given the equation of the line 𝑥+𝑦+8=0. Determine the equation of the line equivalent to this
in a coordinate system with the origin at (3,4).
what is about to do with it, what kind of formula does exist to it
what does it means
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help making this function so that it outputs the exact same value but so that h is defined as any integer >=1,the only issue is h=1 as it creates a singularity, I would preferably like it to be a "discrete" function per se ie,. it doesnt have any domain restrictions and doesnt have any other external definitions
@final ledge Has your question been resolved?
@final ledge Has your question been resolved?
@final ledge Has your question been resolved?
ion think its gonna get resolved
can you not just make it piecewise
no, not for this certain problem as this was originally intended to be apart of a much larger function
i don't understand what you expect instead
a way to rewrite or a different form of the function that still has the same output values at each integer input >=1 that doesnt have a singularity at h=1
but what should it be instead at h=1
if it would be helpful i can provide a table of values if reconstructing a whole new function would work
any integer >=1 works
what does that mean, you want a horizontal line?
no, I want when you plug in 1 for h into the function to not get an undefined term, however dividing by 0 gives that
make it lim g(x)?
i had already considered a limit but as the function only takes integer inputs, unless this would work
ill provide a table of outputs to the function in case that might be helpful to construct a new one
im not sure how a limit could be applied to this but if it can im well open to this
just do like lim g(x) as h-> c and replace all the hs with c in the equation
if this were applied to a sum for example, this would still give discrete integer values
I also need to prevent it from going to infinity at h=1
?
i meant this
no like this
still giving non integer outputs, but its closer than the latter
what do you mean mod inside?
well dang
thats alot messier of a function than i originally intended but it does what i need it to
i guess then
is there any way to simplify it?
if not thats also fine, just wondering
im not familar enough with the modulo function to know if its possible
@final ledge
Closed by @final ledge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this correct?
10^2^2^2
times
10^2^2^2
equals
10^4^4^4
Simplify
10^2^2^2 as 10^x then multiply 10^x with 10^x or square them
Same thing
cant
i cant do that
i need something that works for any amount of exponents
so like 10^10^10 times 10^25
my original question is a little too much-
but i guess
my question, how to represent a number?
where you may represent ludicrously large numbers
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @lime grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not sure how to answer this using cosine rule. Do I have to rearrange?
cosine rule solves for the side opposite angle
so in this case you have a, c, y and are looking for b
= yes rearrange
you can calculate all through sine rule which for me is easier, but whatevs > takes 1 more step
ok i did:
let unknown side = x
19^2 = 12^2 + x^2 - 2 * 12 * x * cos70
and struggling to rearrange for x
do you mind showing me how you would do it using sine rule?
just so i have an alternate way to view the problem
shakes sine rule* $\frac{a}{sin(\alpha)}=\frac{b}{sin(\beta)}=\frac{c}{sin(\gamma)}$
whats the problem with that
just simply look for the angle opposing 12cm, and then find the other angle, and do another sine rule
zzz0nnn
looks to me like a quadratic
a little bit cursed of a quadratic, but yeah
uh huh
yeah this is good
quadratic formula is the way to go
redid equation using sine rule, found it longer but easier then struggling to rearrange cosine rule
Closed by @tardy kestrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So.. Another off topic no math subject. I don't know what the hell am I doing in research..
What?
just ask
It turns out they didn't do anything yet
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @solemn wadi
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to get access to topology channel?
#point-set-topology to be exact
thnx buddy
@floral bramble Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @floral bramble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what have u done alrdy ?
sta1 as I said
ye but idk what stat1 mean
basically no clue
ok
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
this 1 i think
doesn't matter
if u are like 4 grade above me, i dont think i can solve so we will both loose time on it
even just 1 grade above
@heady turtle Has your question been resolved?
are u allowed to do the limit in the integral, and after, calculate the integral ?
wait im gonna delete and ask another q cuz I feel that no one can help this q for now 😂
@timid silo ty maybe I'll ask later
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
wait im trying rn
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! I need a little help studying for an exam, when dealing with transformations like stretches, and you want to find the mew coordinates of a specific point, what would you do?
Would you like sub in the point in x and multiply for the streches and add for translations ect?
Simply yes
but mostly people mess up in rotations and reflections
@lapis spire Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me
You want to get the equation in the form ax^2+bx+c=0, with no fractions
Ok so following that, how can you get rid of the /5 and /4
You don't necessarily need to do that but I guess you could
Nope you're good
By the other denominator
i divide
then miltiply
thx
holdup let me check if ingot it righ
how do i get the bx?
bx is whatever the 5x turns into after undoing the fractions
just times everything by 20
Yea
.close
Closed by @raven kettle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
