#help-10
1 messages · Page 400 of 1
yes
The discriminant is -4k + 16?
,rotate
-4k/-4 = 16/-4
k = -4 (?)
oh
Oh positive 4
Alright thanks so much everyone I can finally submit this atrocity 🙏🏽🤍
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @storm ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
am i allowed to ask for help please
well the top of the garage roof is 1.5m above the ceiling and the distance from the top of the roof to each gutter is 3.5m and I'm meant to calculate the width of the garage which I know the answer is 6.3m but I need to write how it got It but that's the thing someone already told me that answer but didn't write how they got it and i have to use the abc formula
Can you find half the width of the ceiling?
Do you know SOHCAHTOA
yes
do u know pythagoras
Could you use it to find the missing side length of the right side triangle
Oh right, it is just pythagorean theorem, no need for SOHCAHTOA here
thats what im mean to do
yeahh thats what im doing
but i dont know where to put what?
is it plus or take away
because i did √(3.5²+1.5²) and it came up with 3.8m
but the answer im looking for is 6.3m
o
alright look at it this way
you have c
you have a
you are not solving for c
you are solving for b
this means b^2 = c^2 - a^2
plug in the values for c and a you get:
b = sqrt(3.5^2 - 1.5^2)
aka b = 3.16227766017
this is half the wdith of the garage
so the width of the garage is 2b
2b = 2(3.16227766017)
2b = 6.32455532034
^
oh okay thank youuu!
aka 6.3 rounded to the tenths
ahh okay
thank you!!
remember to use .close to close
close to close?
ahh
@mild kernel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mild kernel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi please help? Idk how to approach this question, thanks.
can you write it in modular form?
I'm supposed to work it out using hcf and lcm
im not so sure what that means.
I'm not too advanced, im almost 14
by the division theorem, a number q can be expressed as
q = ma + b
b is the remainder, 5 in this case
q = ma + 5
im not so sure what the division theorom is sorry
multiply until it's 4 digits long
true ... ._. nvm
modular form isn't really needed lol
it's alr lol
yeah
600
yep
Then what do I do, from there?
Ok
aka find a multiple of 600 four digits long
I jst hve a question
Am I supposed to use a method likethis?
my teacher was saying that he cares about the working out more than the answer or sm
so like do i do it with variables do u think?
no
Ohk thankyou
ur method is perfectly fine
i remember not knowing the fact that something like the top can do that, so i plugged in small numbers and basically hoped it worked lmao
yep
Oh lol ok
@warped hearth Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @warped hearth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Find du
2
du = 1/(x-1)^2
ye
then sub u and du into the integral
and then simplify and yada yada
gtg for like 20mins so ask yakubros or something if you get stuck again
! Occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
@granite dragon Has your question been resolved?
@granite dragon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
Please could I have some help understanding differential operators
And how they are shown as a matrix
Is it just a matrix with d/dx down the leading diagonal and zeroes everywhere else
Try asking in #linear-algebra or #odes-and-pdes
Ok
You'll likely to get better answers
Closed by @devout warren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have answer but not sure how to get? i understand that to find the 'chance' we find P(ideal out come)/p(total possibilities)
so it's not P(...)/P(...) you're looking for, it's number(...)/number(total)
so suppose you have to sit M1,....,M5 and W1,...,W5 around a table
make M1 sit anywhere you want, it doesn't matter where since you can rotate the table
if you want to separate the men
what is the "sequence" of M and W that will ensue?
like is MMWWMMW... possible
ok
so forgetting about the number of each person
like M4 becomes M, etc
what are the possibilities?
(for reference you're starting with M since you start from M1)
alr
.close
Closed by @ruby nimbus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @wooden narwhal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I wanted to make sure this was correct
I wanted confirmation that this is right
I thought it should be
Or not
I think i had to divide by 2, not by 4
u were supposed to take the square root of the area
@dense tinsel
or better yet just divide 4.1 by 4
@dense tinsel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've been stuck on this matrices questions for a while, it has to be solved using the gauss-jordan elimination method, could anyone help me out
8 6 4 | 148
6 10 4 | 160
6 10 8 | 180
Did you have any ideas that you tried?
R1 - R3
R2 - R3
R2 = R1 - 4R2
R1 = R3 - R1
and that didnt work
I got the bottom row to be one, but it didnt match the answer at the back! 😢
I see
well, I mean, row operations can be done in any order, which might make things easier if you choose a certain choice first 
In particular, those last two rows, almost look the same 
ooh, ill try something about that, thanks!
You might find that much easier
it'll get rid of things in a different order maybe than you might be used to, but it could be more convenient (imo it is
)
I solved it, thanks!!
@jade leaf Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need to make a piecewise function word problem that when is graphed shows a certain shape. I need help we've been trying all day
What shape?
anything, as long as it draws something
and compatible with a word problem that can be used on a piecewise function
Like when someone solve the riddle or sth, it yields a shape such as star, am I right?
not riddle, rather the word problem
but yeah something like that
World or word?
It’s ok, you’re good
thank you
something like this
but it has to be, a shape when you graph it
we can't seem to make values that matches with the word problem
that can make a shape
Looks interesting
First construct the shape, then the problem.
wait, we tried to do that earlier
Well yeah, lunatic has basically given the main approach
but i don't know how to make it match to the world problem
wait
here
wait actually
i just found out how
thanks to my team
since its negative, we'll do a debt word problem
ill try hol up
@languid mirage Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @languid mirage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is it possible to find the number of Hamiltonian cycles in a tournament graph given that it is strongly connected?
@fierce glade Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
yes
.close
Closed by @fierce glade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @inland thicket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
seriously
cuberoot(x^3) = x^3^(1/3)
and i need to wear a very warm one
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let me think about it for a second
yay sure
a = 3 b = 17
... ik i have the answer, but i need the steps
Since it is not said to divide 20 into 2 EQUAL parts, we will use 2 different variables x and y.
So x + y = 20.
And now just follow the second sentence:
3×x² = y + 10
You're welcome
.close
Closed by @torpid topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to solve x^x^3 = 3
Log that evil expression
Or let y = x^3
Yeah im more into the second
Cuz would be $x = \sqrt[3]{y}$
YakuBros
need lambert W function probably
I have a way without
Exponentiation is not associative. You need parentheses
you mean $x^{x^3}$ yes?
knief
so $\sqrt[3]{y}^y = 3$
YakuBros
$(y^{\frac{1}{3}})^y = 3$
YakuBros
YakuBros
Pretty forward now, remembering y = x^3
Ty bro
@kindred saddle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @kindred saddle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help I’m lost
do you know how to find taylor/maclaurin series?
no idea
well have you been introduced to taylor/maclaurin series yet?
@tall owl Has your question been resolved?
ok. well for now you can use the fact that the "best polynomial approximation near x = 0" should have the same value, first derivative, and second derivative as the function at x = 0
should i. try to teach myself the taylor/maclaurin series or is that something ill learn later in calc BC?
it should be covered by your class
Closed by @tall owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm having trouble with this problem. I'm not sure how to get the sin out the denominator
right, my bad\
But recall that $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x}=1$
Civil Service Pigeon
That’s really all you need
Yeah, but how do I manipulate this into that form? Sorry if this if that's a dumb question, I'm struggling here 😭
You don’t have any factors of x, so add them in yourself
Where it would be beneficial to do so is for you to figure out
Just make sure that you keep it as an equivalent form
So for my first fraction, would I multiply it by 7x/7x?
Yeah you could do that
I guess where I'm confused is what happens to that extra x in the numerator?
Hint: You have two fractions with a sin that you need to “force” this into
what do I do with these extra x's?
oops that should only be x in the second fraction
hmmm okay
$\frac{7}{3} \cdot \frac{\sin 7x}{7x} \cdot \frac{3x}{\sin 3x} \cdot \frac{1}{\cos 7x}$
Civil Service Pigeon
It should be this
I mean that’s what the original question says
So I just end up with 7/3?
Yeah
whooof, calculus is confusing. Thanks for the help
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@rocky mesa Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, basically I'm trying to find the perimeter of this parallelogram but I'm not sure how to find that missing side. The problem gives that triangle for extra info but I'm not sure what to do with it
Thank you
And for clarification, the line of at extending from (a) to the right side of the parallelogram is supposed to be one single straigbt line
Similar triangles adb and cde
With a coefficient of 1/2 => cd = 1/2ad=6
@shell fulcrum
Closed by @shell fulcrum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
dont u have to flip the inequality sign after dividing?
or is that something else
only if the number you divide by is negative
Closed by @odd mortar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
well technically reciprocal also requires flipping
to be fair its just simplifying both side, you dont do any "dividing both sides by xyz" here
He was referring to flipping the inequality sign
yes iirc if you get the reciprocal of both sides you have to flip the inequality sign as well, not just negatives
5 > 3
1/5 < 1/3
good to know
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain to me what is wrong with my proof for de moivre's for rational numbers?
@woven urchin Has your question been resolved?
@woven urchin Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@woven urchin Has your question been resolved?
You need to separate what properties you're given and what your work is
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i ask for help here
apparently at least one of these are wrong
im like 99 percent sure the first three are right
it said the fourth one was wrong and that didnt even maje sense to me
8
5, 6 , and 8 are wrong?
4 seems right
i think yes
5, def not approaching -4
6, same thing
and 8, it does exist (it's asking for the limit not the value)
there could be others wrong idk
Lim x approaches 3 definitely approaches a value
i put dne because i thought it was a double sided that are both different values therefore dne
we're talking about 8 right?
Yeah number 8
yes
both are approaching 0 as x->3
It approaches 0 from both sides like he said. It doesnt need to be defined at the point for the limit to exist
do you always start at the closed dots when moving from left to right or vice versa
u start from wherever
i guess i was just tripping out and i was doing it like this
hold on ill send image
Also 5,6 are wrong, im not sure where you got those answers from
As x approaches 1 from the positive side, ie from the right, what does f(x) approach
is this question 2
No 6
six says positive one approaching from the right
x approaching positive 1 from the right
is it also 3
Where did you get 3 from
Dawg look at the graph if you need help
You legit circled the point
What did you put
-1
Yes
oh wait nvm its right i accidentally added a space after and it doesnt accept that
🤦
my b
No not ur bad
Whoever made the website’s bad
Ok now use the same logic approaching from the left for number 5
so if not 4 then 3
No dont go guessing again😭
im not guessing i just seriously dont understand
Ok, same logic, as x approaches 1 from the negative side, ie from the left, what does f(x) approach
So look at the graph as it gets close to 1 on the left end
if its not 3 or 4 idk
The y value dawg
like im starting from that closed dot then moving from there to the right, and the function ends at 4 from what i see
o
0.5
the y value of the closed dot?
First thing is that the graph never even goes to y=4
Second, dont think about the endpoints too much
We are talking about just the limits from one side
So look at the graph and scan across it starting from the left and stop at x=1
this is how i thought im supposed to look at it
ok
A point like (0,-2.5) is to the left of the (1, -1)
When i talk about “from the left”, i mean to the left of x=1, not starting from x=1 and moving left
You need to understand that the x approaches 1 doesn’t mean where you start, but rather where you end up
but doesnt the - mean from the left then to the right
oh
Until you end up at x=1
so i can start from anywhere at that function but must end up at x=1
so i actually dont even worry about that function on the right side and look at the other one instead
Yessir
Yep👏
awesome thx man
Np
i was looking at it completely different and didnt realize it bc somehow i was getting like 85 percent of the problems right
It makes much more sense once you understand what its asking for
I mean you dont have to sketch it once you understand it, but when you’re starting out it can be helpful just to visualize your work
I would stick to the graph they give you though; it has all the necessary information
well i mean in this problem its not me willingly using it its asking me to use desmos and graph it once i solve
Once you get the hang of it the graphing will practice get more tedious. They probably wont ask you to graph for most problems though; they only ask you to do this for your understanding.
ok well idek how to do that so im gonna watch org chem tutor on yt
Ight
thx for the help it really made more sense after you explained
Ofc, thats what we’re here for
do you hagv
do you have any video explaining how to do this
i cant find a video on yt
@tawdry lark
Idk i never did it before
am i allowed to ping helpers role\
<@&286206848099549185>
@brittle holly Has your question been resolved?
@brittle holly Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @brittle holly
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
I've been having trouble with this problem on my test
this is my progress so far
I think I did something wrong?
Idk how to keep going 😅
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @ember dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
!15min
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am absolutely lost and have made no progress, ive tried all i can but all my answers have been wrong
What did you get for du?
-2r dr
6 to 375, it said to order them so “that the lower limit integration is less than the upper limit of integration”
,calc 631-25^2
Result:
6
,calc 631-16^2
Result:
375
Are they swapped or did you already swap them because of the -sign on -2rdr
i swapped them already
i got -1/2 (u)^1/2 du
i cant do square roots so im just doing to the 1/2 power
Why is there a -sign
is there not supposed to be
.
that was my last attempt
When you swap the limits, you pick up a -sign
ok maybe i didnt swap like i thought
i see that was the issue now
thank you😭
will not make it again, i was stuck on that for too long
thank you again, how do i close this
Type .close
Closed by @unique storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If I have a plastic cup that's shaped like this, how would I use optimisation to find the minimum surface area of plastic to hold a specific volume of liquid V? I was trying to use surface of revolution (integration) and then differentiate to find minimum point, but then there are 3 variables - the radius of the base r, the height of the cup h, and how slanted the sides are (difference between the x coordinate of the top corner and the x coordinate of the bottom corner is t, in the image of the graph). I can't figure out how to do this without having to reduce the number of variables down to 2. I am ignoring the thickness of the plastic (assume it is negligible).
@zenith marten Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
hi guys
"shaped like this" is too vague to not use two variables
should i just set radius as a constant then
It's your problem I dunno
no but is there a way to do it without having to set radius as a constant
@zenith marten Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i ask mat questions here
go ahead
If it is related to maths then sure
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
do you have any more information? Like a description
It looks like the differences of the corresponding top and bottom numbers are taken. This works everywhere except the first 5 in 551
Yeah it just looks like | top nunber - bottom number |
Closed by @neon gazelle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im having trouble with this question
i looked up this solution but heres the issuehttps://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1180601068799918220/1279757359828307999/image.png?ex=66d59a6b&is=66d448eb&hm=f7cb6b0f4346d00f39db9e9d32cd49429f8af1b1266756d698d55e3e018a32c1&
they are dividing the quotient successively, not the number
thats my problem
10 works
Consider the number 10
oki give me a moment
wait
thank you so much wth
this is way easier
i got the ans 0,0,2 as remainders instantly
@small sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
"Let there be a square with sides a + 6, if we cut out an inner square if sides a - 1. if the shape we left with has an area equal to another square with sides k, find the minimum of a + k (a and k are positive integers greater than 1)
i got that 14a + 35 = k^2 and the possible (a,k) are (1,7)and (29,21)
but a > 1 so a + k = 50?
im wondering if i missed any a less than 29
can i ask this chapter is based on differentiation or other topic? since finding minimum can have many ways depending on the topic of that chapter
this question was included in a standard math education test for 8th grade
ok
so i dont think differentiating is used
but id still want to know how to do it with differentiating
cant a be 1?
wait nvm
iam dumb lol
i think u need other ppl to help you, i have no idea on this question
this is probably correct
its thai
is there any faster way to get to the solution than what i did? (testing different a's and so on)
well
if you rewrite your equation you get a=(k^2)/14-35
and since a and k have to be integers
and 35 is an integer
than k^2/14 must be an integer
oh
It's a quadratic so you prolly have all of them
then k must be a multiple of 7
thanks
i think this question would be too hard for a standard math test, no?
cause most people arent even taught (a + b)^2
it is quite methodical
then this question would be quite difficult, yes
Closed by @ionic oar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is (1/k) from 0 to infinity a diverging sequence?
So 1 not 0 becareful
k can't be 0
i think a common proof is to take the series and group the terms 1 + 1/2 + (1/3 + 1/4) + (1/5 + 1/6 + 1/7 + 1/8) + ... and you can see that each of the groups are greater than 1/2 and thus the series is divergent
yeah sorry my bad
but the series is bounded from below right?
don't conflate sequence with series
im sorry, im pretty new to the concept
Sequence is the "list" of the terms
No prob you're here to learn, don't be sorry
okayyyyy
so, the sequence is bounded below right? like it cant go below a certain point. also the limit of the inifite'th term is 0
and the sequence is monotonically decreasing, why then is it not considered converging?
Its bounded above too, by 1. And it is converging
The sequence is converging, but the serie isin't
Yes
And btw
If you want a different case, where both converges (sequence and serie), you have for integers k non zero, 1/k^2
To pi^2 /6 indeed
That the sequence converges or the serie converges ?
It is known as basel problem, if you're interested you can look into https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basel_problem
The Basel problem is a problem in mathematical analysis with relevance to number theory, concerning an infinite sum of inverse squares. It was first posed by Pietro Mengoli in 1650 and solved by Leonhard Euler in 1734, and read on 5 December 1735 in The Saint Petersburg Academy of Sciences. Since the problem had withstood the attacks of the lead...
okay thanks
You're welcome
.close
Closed by @surreal pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain how to get to this answer
| x − a | is distance between x and a
so it's points that are equally far from −321 and 750, so there should be one like that
but why equally far between -321 and 750
,, \abs{x} = \sqrt{x^2}
bacc
wut
what
Then you can square both sides and solve the quadratic equation
oh okay
there's no need to apply |x| = sqrt(x^2)
you can square directly if you want to go that route
nvm, just thought if it differently
How is |x| injective
What about x=-y
It isn't
Yes
Let x+321=-(x-750)
x+321=x-750 is not a valid option I think 🤔
I am thinking but have no idea
Absolute value gives the same output for -z and z (z is a number)
So I picked the negative value
id say the easiest way is to draw a quick diagram to see which branches u need to equate
doesnt have to be to scale
but what should I do with this
let x+321=-(x+750)
Solve for x from here
Yes
Hmmm what do you mean? 🤔
nah like there are multiple solutions right
so like a quick graph of the two graph will show u where they intecept
so u know what branches of each graph u take
I re checked the question
It says|x-750|
Not |x+750|
MB
😭
I corrected the error 😞
😞
Now try it again @restive coral
😅
Yay ✋
Well |-x| is...
|x-750| translates TO -(x-750) ??
No
Whaaaaaaaaaat
If you consider the cases where both are ++ or -- then you got no solution but a wrong statement cause x falls off
.close
Closed by @restive coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
bacc
How did u get this inside the log
Actually
The more I look at it the more it confuses me
Either it's expressed bad or it's just wrong
bacc
The step is just wrong, judging by the next lines
pls don't ping me
no thx
Alr
I'm sorry
I would consinder a substitution
,, \lim_{x \to 0} = (1+2x)^{\frac{1}{2x}} = \lim_{u \to \infty} = \left (1+\frac{1}{u} \right )^{u}
bacc
This should let you understand whats going on in the numerator
Thats literally the limit definition of e
The way I wrote it
You basically have 0/0
<@&286206848099549185>
Now I understand south
Wdym ?
@chrome arch Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @chrome arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi so can someone explain what is inverse functions such as arcosine and artan and arsine?
idk really get those
yes so
we know that
for eg.
sin(π/6) = 1/2
so now understand like
arc sin (1/2) or sin inverse (1/2) = π/6
in short arcsinx or arccosx is an angle for which you get x
so if,
a ==> some constant b/w [-1, 1]
sin x = a
arc sin(a) would be equal to x
(there could be multiple solution, but we take principle values)
When trying to solve sin(π) you are trying to find what sin is at the angle π
When trying to solve arcsin(0) you are trying to find what the starting angle is if sin is equal to 0
Since there are multiple places where sin can be 0 you COULD have multiple solutions. However, it depends on the range you are given, but more likely than not for arcsin it will be between -π/2 and π/2. This means the only solution within this range for arcsin(0) would be 0.
TLDR: for sin you are just trying to find what sin is given the starting angle and for arcsin you are trying to find the starting angle given what sin is.
@prime imp Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @prime imp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain how this is even possible
Alright so you need to know how radicals work first
rad(3x^2) is the same as rad(3) * rad(x^2)
and rad(x^2) is just x
so they just took out the x
ye, it matters what the line is above
you can see that it isnt covering the x, only the 3
i think he was just asking how rad(3x^2) turned into rad(3)*x
but he didnt realize it was rad(3)*x and instead thought it was rad(3x)
hence underlined part
But sqrt(x^2) is not generally x
But |x|
That is why i was asking for more context
this is the context Write the following expressions, in which x represents a positive real number, as simple as
possible:
(sqrt(3x) - sqrt(x))/(sqrt(3x) + sqrt(x))
Perfect
don be to pointy
Positive was the info missing for me
Accurate
I dont understand what just happened
hahah right
I understand what @haughty stump said but not what you (@samuel) said
Oh hes just being technical
Sometimes sqrt(x^2) can only be one thing
if x was given as either a positive or negative integer
When you have only positive numbers, you can indeed say that sqrt(x^2) = x
But nor when you have whole domain
Because for example, sqrt(3^2) = sqrt((-3)^2)
But -3 is not = to 3
Instead |3| = |-3|
Closed by @restive coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm currently trying to learn the delta-epsilon proof (which is killing my mind), and in this example with quadratics, I think I loosely understand everything up to the part where I highlighted, which I do not see the logic behind "bounding" |x+3|, what does bounding even mean in this situation? Also if I can get help with the rest of the proof after that, that would be great too
You want the |x + 3| term to be at most "something", so that you can "ignore" it
You can then replace the |x + 3| in |x + 3||x - 3| with its upper bound (with the appropriate inequality), and then just deal with what you end up finding, which'll only have the |x - 3| to work with
In their case, they choose to force delta to be at most 1, which means that |x + 3| < 7, so you then can say that |x + 3||x - 3| < 7|x - 3|
how did they go from delta <=1 to -1 < x-3 < 1?
|x-3| < delta
and delta <= 1
imply |x-3| < 1, which you can rewrite as -1 < x-3 < 1
They did the inequality chains here: the fact that x + 3 is strictly greater than 5 means it's [x + 3 is] positive, so x + 3 = |x + 3|
so they took the |x-3| < delta from the 0 < |x-3| < delta and kinda just ignored the 0 part?
they didn't ignore it, they just rewrote the second inequality
@limpid eagle Has your question been resolved?
(as an alternate way, you can use the triangle inequality to say |x + 3| = |(x - 3) + 6| <= |x - 3| + 6 < 1 + 6)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do u do this
i just dont get the pi thing
The bounds indicate the quadrant. sin theta indicates the ratio of the opposite side to the hypotenuse of a supposed triangle. Use Pythagoras to find the last side and then solve for tan and cos theta
the values of sin cos and tan change depending on the quadrant they are on
yes
you're supposed to make a triangle in that quadrant of the unit circle
and then use the information to make a right triangle
solve for cos theta and tan theta
@fresh bay Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Quick question:
If the derivitive of 0 is 0 why is it und at that point?
Like i understand it graphically but idk the mathamatical reason
The 3rd x in the first piece wise is = 0 btw this is just modeling abs(x)
because the derivative at 0 isn't 0.
If you look at the limit definition of the derivative at x = 0, then you get different values for the left and right limits. So the limit is undefined, and thus the derivative is undefined.
ah
Ok wait do you have a resource that defines differentiability?
like rules and such
This is the classic example for why differentiability says a function must be smooth and continuous to be differentiable.
stuff like this lol
I cant find one
any calc book would have it.
Closed by @late roost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
Wont you get 0 coming from both sides?
Limit as x -> 0 of -x is 0 (left)
and of right is also 0
for |x|, yes. Not the derivative limit though.
you basically get $lim_{h\to0} \frac{|h|}{h}$ which goes to 1 for h>0 and -1 for h<0
So the left and right limits disagree.
Zybikron
Ok but whats the reason for even taking the limit, for a function to be differenciable does the limit need to exist at that point too?
Or is that just continunity
if $f(x)$ is a function, then the derivative of $f(x)$ at $x=a$ is $f'(a) = \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(a+h) - f(a)}{h}$.\
here we have a = 0
Zybikron
h is just deta(x) right
yes
the value we're taking to 0 for the limit
yes
since we only care about the x = 0 point, you can just plug in x=0 into that fraction
yes
forget i said that
I plugged it in for x
by mistake lmfao
ok it would be 0/h
or 0/0
so just 0 / 0
which is indeterminant. That doesn't tell you anything.
you cant h'lopitals it
you'd need to do the derivative of |h|, which is the problem to begin with.
ok sorry im more lost
just to break it down
The def of a derivitive is this:
so we are trying to define it a f(0)
yes
which leaves us with this :
we cant h'lopitals it because it would just keep being 0/0?
you'd need to take the derivative of |h| at 0, which is the problem you're trying to solve.
yes.
I'm saying, to do l'hopital. You have to do the derivative of the top and bottom of |h| / h
So you'd need to find the derivative of |h|, which is the problem you started with (finding the derivative of |x|)
no
oh

thanks
