#help-10
1 messages · Page 394 of 1
its linear algebra
okay yes sorry what is a system
at least the basics of it
in linear algebra
i thought matrices was linear algebra
you can solve it using matrices or adding/subtracting the equations from each other
hmm
okay so 2h+c = 30, 2w+h=20, c+w=15, h+c+w=x
for matrices would it be better not to add them together
for this system id leave the last equation out until you find the value of each variable first
if i wanted to do this with matrices what would be the point of doing the system
dont i just get an answer from the systems
to set up the matrix
but if i had the value of each variable
i could just add h+c+w
i thought i could use a matrix to get to x
is that wrong
like without having to use the systems
the matrix helps you find the value of each variable
matrix is used to represent the system
mmm mmm okay
row reduction operations is essentially elimination
2h+c = 30, 2w+h=20, c+w=15
so could i put these into rows or something
im sorry i am a total stranger to matrixes
or linear algebra
equation systems i get and can occasionally do but i am not very good at them
you're pretty much representing the same thing with a matrix here, just without explicitly writing stuff like the variables
keeps stuff more organised and makes the next step of elimination clearer
i think maybe i have been unclear in how unfamiliar i am with a matrix
i know there are rows in a matrix
and columns
i have seen a matrix
i have no clue how it works or what it is used for: I guess it is related to systems as you said earlier
once I have turned the picture into different equations
how would i go about putting it in a matrix
like what goes where, what part goes into what row/column combination
if anyone wants to explain in laymans terms what a matrix is used for it would be greatly apprciated
i disagree with this claim (or at the very least, find it misleading)
minimal knowledge of linear algebra is required to effectively solve a linear system of 3 equations in 3 variables
Okay
Yes I do not have minimal knowledge beyond there are rows and columns
I heard you could multiply them
That's all I know
yes okay
i got these
2h+c = 30, 2w+h=20, c+w=15
how do i determine which number goes where
or variable i mean
to clarify, by "minimal knowledge" i mean "zero knowledge" *
You can write them vertically aligning the same variables on the same line
i already solved this both intuitively and by using systems
i wanted to explore matrixes
i havent done anything with matrixes before
okay yes
$0w+2h+c=30$\newline
$2w+1h+0c=20$\newline
$1w+0h+1c=15$
Bendover
you can scroll to the very bottom to see examples on how it's done
that make sense
and then youll divide the terms to matrices and vectors
$\begin{bmatrix}
0&2&1\
2&1&0\
1&0&1
\end{bmatrix}$
Bendover
the variables dissapear
and you can make the varible vector and multiply both
we dont need them here because each column represents a variable now
oh yeah
oh okay
wait
so a matrice could be used in a 3d coordinate system
like to get a vector going in any direction
i have only used vectors in 2d planes so far
mainly in physics
$\begin{bmatrix}
0&2&1\
2&1&0\
1&0&1
\end{bmatrix}$
$\begin{bmatrix}
w\
h\
c
\end{bmatrix}$
Bendover
then set this equal to the solution vector
let me google what a solution matrix is
$\begin{bmatrix}
0&2&1\
2&1&0\
1&0&1
\end{bmatrix}$
$\begin{bmatrix}
w\
h\
c
\end{bmatrix}$=
$\begin{bmatrix}
30\
20\
15
\end{bmatrix}$
Bendover
oh
then you can use any method you want
30
20
15
is the solutions matrix?
I meant vector(it doesntt have a foemal name, i just like to call it that)
can you finish it by your own or you need help
i dont think i can solve it by myself from here but at least i know more about matrixes now
*using matrixes i cant solve it
like i said i already solved it through other means
okay well go through it, i love the elimination mathod so we will use that
just to be clear
the rows are the variables here
or is it the columns
i assume rows
no its just a representation of the system of equations, when you multiply it you get the first thing we started with,
when you say multiply it
what is it
multiplying the matrix with the numbers with the matrix including the variables?
when we multiply it we get
$\begin{bmatrix}
0w+2h+c\
2w+1h+0c\
1w+0h+1c
\end{bmatrix}$=
$\begin{bmatrix}
30\
20\
15
\end{bmatrix}$
Bendover
and thats the equation we started with, no?
yes that's how i meant
yes
yeah i wasnt disagreeing i was just confused about what you meant by "it"
so do you know how to reduce the matrix
i do not know how to reduce the matrix or what that means
also i noticed that that once you multiplied "it" that the variables went from being sorted in rows to being sorted in columns
that confuses me a little bit
here the variables are aligned nicely in columns
here they are aligned in rows?
i dont understand why that is
or if it is important or not
what are the prerequisites of using matrixes
maybe i am missing something more fundamental
wait im trying to show you how its done
ok yep
first we wrote the givens like this 2h+c = 30, 2w+h=20, c+w=15
and then you showed me that yes there is 0w in the first one, 0c in the second and 0h in the last one
2h+c+0w = 30, 2w+h+0c =20, c+w+0h=15
seeing that makes it easier to understand where to put/align everything within a matrix
you aligned them in columns instead of rows and i was just not sure if that makes a big difference or not
2h c 0w
h 0c 2w
0h c w
but kind of pointless with the variables
2 1 0
1 0 2
0 1 1
but now i think i got the order wrong
so i am lost here
This is the reduced form step by step$\begin{bmatrix}
0&2&1\
2&1&0\
1&0&1
\end{bmatrix}$\rightarrow
$\begin{bmatrix}
2&1&0\
0&2&1\
1&0&1
\end{bmatrix}$\rightarrow
$\begin{bmatrix}
1&\frac{1}{2}&0\
0&2&1\
1&0&1
\end{bmatrix}$\rightarrow
$\begin{bmatrix}
1&\frac{1}{2}&0\
0&2&1\
0&-\frac{1}{2}&1
\end{bmatrix}$\rightarrow
$\begin{bmatrix}
1&\frac{1}{2}&0\
0&1&\frac{1}{2}\
0&-\frac{1}{2}&1
\end{bmatrix}$\rightarrow
$\begin{bmatrix}
1&0&-\frac{1}{4}\
0&1&\frac{1}{2}\
0&-\frac{1}{2}&1
\end{bmatrix}$\rightarrow
$\begin{bmatrix}
1&0&-\frac{1}{4}\
0&1&\frac{1}{2}\
0&0&\frac{5}{4}
\end{bmatrix}$\rightarrow
$\begin{bmatrix}
1&0&-\frac{1}{4}\
0&1&\frac{1}{2}\
0&0&1
\end{bmatrix}$\rightarrow
$\begin{bmatrix}
1&0&0\
0&1&\frac{1}{2}\
0&0&1
\end{bmatrix}$\rightarrow
$\begin{bmatrix}
1&0&0\
0&1&0\
0&0&1
\end{bmatrix}$
Bendover
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
do you understand whats going on
mmm no sorry, i see that the numbers switch places after the first step
but i cant determine why
if you dont understand this you should probably take a linear algebra class
$\begin{bmatrix}
1&0&0\
0&1&0\
0&0&1
\end{bmatrix}$
$\begin{bmatrix}
w\
h\
c
\end{bmatrix}$=
$\begin{bmatrix}
5\
10\
10
\end{bmatrix}$
Bendover
so this is the simplified form, they are equivallent
and at last to find the solution you just multiply rhe matrix and the vector
Then this is the last answer, the matrix is an identity matrix so its like multiplying by 1;;;;$\begin{bmatrix}
w\
h\
c
\end{bmatrix}$=
$\begin{bmatrix}
5\
10\
10
\end{bmatrix}$
Bendover
so w=5, h=10 and c=10
you mentioned a vector
that is the matrix that has w h c in it
right?
I meant the variable vector
yes
OK
so was that helpful
i wont ask you to explain this entire thing
yes it has been
but would you mind explaining the first step
how you went from
0 2 1
2 1 0
1 0 1
to
2 1 0
0 2 1
1 0 1
or is that still too complicated
as long as i do it to the solution vector
its just to make things simpler
and when i transformed the matrix, the solution vector also got transformed the same way, it was not shown but you notice it was changed at last right
its like adding, multiplying, and stuff, you will understand it when you take linear algebra
its a pleasure helping you, thanks
np, i just woke up and wanted to help people, you really made my day, gotta go to school
Closed by @plucky trail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @obtuse ginkgo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is it okay if I didn’t arrange the variables with the exponents?
yes
All u did is right mb
@mystic tulip Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mystic tulip
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me understand this problem
A rectangle has a length that is 4 times its width. If the area of the rectangle is increased by 200 square units by increasing its length by 5 units and its width by 2 units, what are the original dimensions of the rectangle?
@uncut lodge Has your question been resolved?
construct two equations
oh
actually no sorry
before it increases its units
the length is 4w and its width is w right
so what should the area of this rectangle be?
before it increases its size
@uncut lodge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @uncut lodge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with part b
Waves and motion?
@lament heart Has your question been resolved?
No it’s about hook’s law
.close
Closed by @lament heart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is y=|x| continuous at x=0
Closed by @silent spear
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would one use these facts to show that the sequences converge to pi?
I skipped this question previously while working through this book but it looks interesting.
lol i've done a similar problem but it was for AM and GM instead
I think I would show "bn <= an, an+1 <= an and bn+1 >= bn" by induction
a_n and b_n are defined recursively, meaning they depend on the previous values
as an example
fibonacci is defined by "first numbers are 0 and 1, then the next number is the sum of the two previous ones"
if the next number is a_n
then the two previous ones are a_(n-1) and a_(n-2)
so a_n = a_(n-1) + a_(n-2)
@grizzled orbit if you don't see how to prove induction I can give you more hints, just ping
@grizzled orbit Has your question been resolved?
oh okay sorry about that
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi can anyone help me with question related to backpropagation?
Lets say in the case of a simple network like above, where:
L = Loss
a = activation of a cell
z = sum of linear operation at the cell (without activation function)
w = weight
and i want to calculate the partial derivative dL/dw2 (how much L changes with respect to w2). I can use of course the chain rule like so:
dL/dw2 = dL/da3 * da3/dz3 * dz3/dw2
that makes sense to me, but now i want to calculate dL/dw1,
Based on the computation graph, i would need dz3/da2, da2/dz2 and dz2/dw1 to finally get dL/dw1 by chain ruling with my previously computed derivatives when calculating dL/dw2.
My question now is do i need to compute dz3/da2, da2/dz2 and dz2/dw1 manually or is there some way i can use the chain rule to get these as well without manually evaluating the derivative?
@spare needle Has your question been resolved?
@spare needle Has your question been resolved?
@spare needle Has your question been resolved?
@spare needle Has your question been resolved?
@spare needle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi. Can anyone tell me is this enough to conclude f(x) is an odd function?
@slim surge Has your question been resolved?
if for every t in R there is an x such that xf(x) = t, then (combined with the above) f is odd
can you prove it now, or come up with a counterexample now, knowing that a counterexample needs to NOT have that property?
on second thought this might not be helpful and you should consider ignoring me
on third thought i have solved the problem and can confirm it is helpful and you should not ignore me
i have also solved the problem and can confirm this is helpful
@slim surge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How many elements in this powerset
do you know the formula for the cardinality of the power set of a finite set?
2^n
right
Closed by @ionic parcel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi can anyone help me with question related to backpropagation?
Lets say in the case of a simple network like above, where:
L = Loss
a = activation of a cell
z = sum of linear operation at the cell (without activation function)
w = weight
and i want to calculate the partial derivative dL/dw2 (how much L changes with respect to w2). I can use of course the chain rule like so:
dL/dw2 = dL/da3 * da3/dz3 * dz3/dw2
that makes sense to me, but now i want to calculate dL/dw1,
Based on the computation graph, i would need dz3/da2, da2/dz2 and dz2/dw1 to finally get dL/dw1 by chain ruling with my previously computed derivatives when calculating dL/dw2.
My question now is do i need to compute dz3/da2, da2/dz2 and dz2/dw1 manually or is there some way i can use the chain rule to get these as well without manually evaluating the derivative?
@spare needle Has your question been resolved?
@spare needle Has your question been resolved?
@spare needle Has your question been resolved?
@spare needle Has your question been resolved?
@spare needle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @spare needle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is this wrong?
Yes.
Why is this incorrect? I did everything by the rules
@mystic cypress Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> Is something wrong with my question?
Hello?
@mystic cypress Has your question been resolved?
@mystic cypress Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me out with the solution to this problem
@signal fractal Has your question been resolved?
use ratio test to find interval of convergence
I have
what did you get?
and what does the ratio test say if the result is greater than 1?
It diverges
But what about the interval
there is no interval
🤨🤨🤨
that shouldn't be correct, since n! grows faster than x^n
which means that no matter what value of x, the series should always diverge, with the exception of x=0
So how would you write it in an exam
np!
Closed by @signal fractal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
on the integral -inf to inf of cos x/(x²+1) why dont we take the residue of lim z->- i (z+i) f(z)?
assuming you're integrating over a semicircular arc (positive imaginary components), the complex number -i falls outside of the contour hence its residue is not needed
I kind of missed the concept of this contour thingy. Could you please brief it just enough so i can solve the questions(i dont need proof)
Id be very grateful 🙏
do you have class notes/textbook?
I missed the class 😦
And i dont have any friends in class
To take it from
@grand relic Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey there I'm doing some precalc problems, im with the one on the image:
Doing my calculations I get 18 minutes, chatgpt says its 57 minutes, and the book does not have this exercise resolve.
Thanks in advance!
Why tho?
Because if you start with 2 instead of 1, you need one fewer split to get to the same amount
1 fewer split = 3 minutes
But, I thinked of this problem as, If i got 2 amoebas, I got the double of duplication
I mean, if I start with two, at the first 3 minutes I'll have 4 amoebas, instead of 2 amoebas if i had started with one
Or not?
just a guess
that's right
yes
haha
The idea is you're one step ahead if you start with 2 instead of 1
and one step takes 3 minutes
yess
so you only need 60-3=57 minutes
did it in my head
:(
buddy I'm just saying if someone's asking for help on a math problem you don't need to be gloating that you solved it mentally 💀
If i need 2^20 amoebas for filling the jar, If i had 2 amoebas, i just needed 2^10
mb
not 2^10
did not mean to
thinking 2^10 its the half of 2^20 💀
np

.close
Closed by @valid temple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
chatgpt is ryt here , i am also getting 57 min
@fallen pine @valid temple
Soln
2 * (2^n) = 2 ^ 20
n=19 splits
for every split , it takes 3 mins so 19 spilts means 57 mins. 👍
ANSWER
@wraith lake Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
any hint
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@west delta Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @west delta
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you prove that, if f:R -> R is continuous and invertible, then it is strictly monotone?
@wraith hornet Has your question been resolved?
Hint: Invertible implies it's injective.
yeah that's true
https://homepages.math.uic.edu/~marker/mtht430/c11.pdf
took me a while to find a proof of this online but this is the only one i found that makes sense to me
.close
Closed by @wraith hornet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whats the parametric equation for the surface of a torus?
Closed by @silk maple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Problem 58. Let p_{n} be the nth prime number. Prove that p_{n} < 2 ^ (2 ^ n)
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
are you familiar with bertrand's postulate
@night idol Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
\
Hey I am sketching this graph
and I found the end points and y int
im just very confused how do I know how many x intercepts there are?
@rose ferry the function is periodic, there are either infinity or exactly 0
Ah, first you need to find the period
2pi/3
Next, find the x offset
That is, the offset from the normal cosine function
yep
3π/4
where is that from?
cos(3(x -π/4)) = cos(3x - 3π/4)
So where you'd normally have cos(0) = 1, instead you have f(3π/4) = 1
And instead of a period taking 2π it takes 2π/3
Where do the zeroes normally fall?
zeroes?
As in what are the x values of the x-intercepts?
i dont know
For a normal cosine function?
And the rest are offset by kπ where k is an integer
right?
So, we know the x-intercepts for cos(u)
And we know that u = 3(x-π/4)
We can solve for x
And plug in values for u that we know are zeroes
And see if they're in the range
ahh i think someone told me something like this in the server before
like 2pi would = 6.blahblaj
and pi = -3.1415
Well, not quite
so when we find the points we keep addind a period until it is out of the range
right?
Maybe? It's a little muddled, and I'm not sure if I'm understanding what you're conveying
You don't need the decimal expansion of pi
example
if we find the point when y = 0 x = 5pi/12
we can find 5pi/12 as a decimal
and see if it is between -pi and 2pi
Oh, no need for that
that makes sense for me
like seeing it in numbers
i dont really understand the range not in a number
If 5π/12 is in the range -pi to 2pi, then 5/12 is in the range of -1 to 2, right?
probably lol
the only problem is my test is tech free and i will have no access to a calculator
ok
And if 5/12 is then 5π/12 is between -π and 2π
can you show me how you would find all the points
just explain your working out and ill watch
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
i wont copy this
it helps me more to just watch what you do
then i can apply it to another question like how they do in examples
Then I'll do a slightly different problem, changing the numbers and function
its okay please do this one
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
I can walk you through an example
alright i guess you can change the numbers
But I can't walk you through this problem
So let f(x) = 3sin(5x - π/2)
From here I can tell the period is 2π/5 and the offset is π/2
So we have u = 5x - π/2, and I want zeroes in the range [-π/2, π/2]
Solve for x, x = u/5 + π/10
A variable yes
when you do u = 5x - pi/2 what happens to 3sin
This is why I used u
f(x) = 3sin(5x - π/2)
f(u) = 3sin(u)
I want f(u) = 0
So 0 = 3 sin(u), 0 = sin(u)
Then I solve for u, I know that sin(u) is 0 whenever u = kπ for k in Integers
So, x = kπ/5 + π/10
Or x = (2k + 1)π/10
We want x between -π/2 and π/2, which is -5π/10 and 5π/10
We can see this is satisfied for k = -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2
So our zeroes in the range are -5π/10, -3π/10, -π/10, π/10, 3π/10, 5π/10
The end
@rose ferry
back to the start
where does 3 sin go
when you do u = 5x - pi/2
I explained from here #help-10 message
I'm asserting that u is equal to this. This is my definition of u
why do you want f(u) to = 0
Because we're looking for x-intercepts right?
so is u the y value
No
f(u) is the y value
f(x) is as well
I'm kinda punning the function f a little
Using it to mean two different but very related things
i understand if you want to move on to someone else
my teacher has never explained it like this
This u stuff is just me trying to be very structured with how I approach the problem
using different variable and taking out the bracket into a new function
Think of u as a convenient variable that means what I want it to mean
I want f(u) to be easy to solve
Because f(x) is slightly tricky
And then I solve f(u), and then convert the solutions in u to solutions in x
And this way I solve f(x)
It's like
and to find the endpoints you just substitute in the values they give you
You go up to your house, but your door is locked.
Now you know there's a key, but the key is under a flower pot in the backyard.
So you jump the fence, and check under the flower pot, then go in through the backdoor to open the front door
You got the front door open, a hard problem, by solving a series of easier ones
ok
how did you know when to stop adding a period
oh ok
would this kind of question be on a tech free test
with just your own knowledge
fck
@rose ferry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you obtained the decay equation. Can you tell what is m in the left hand side?
Closed by @shrewd comet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
question 6 (c) chapter 1 principles of mathematical analysis by walter rudin
i am a bit confused whether i am on the right track or not
i first defined the set of all numbers b^t where t is rational and t <=r. Im not sure if this requires proof but since b>1 i said that b^r>=b^t for all b^t in the set. i then i assumed that b^r was not the supremum, then there exists another rational r where s<r and b^s=supB(r). but then there exists a rational q st s<q<r and hence b^q>b^s a contradiction as b^q is an element of B(r). therefore b^r is the least upper bound
is this a valid sketch of a proof for this question?
@inland lantern Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @inland lantern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> please help
Find det R and the transpose of R
Mutiply 1/det R with the transposed R with the correct signs changed and you will the the inverse of R
@timid silo
I would use a b c and d instead of all those numbers
I’m not sure on what to do next so, Good luck!
after that i think i have to find the number of possible arrangement for replacing a b c d with the given elements
yeah
for an invertible matrix det R can not be zero
the adj R should not also be a null matrix
any other possibilty? @clear cosmos
@clear cosmos
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
you can use the characteristic equation with the coefficients redefined as tr and det A
yeah thanks
i tried it
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @jade copper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is this wrong
uh so i just did rise over run and then opposite reciprocal (idk if thats how its spelt)
cuz I'm pretty sure my teacher just put in the wrong answer or something
can this conclusion be made?
which line is the "original line"? only thing I can think of is maybe your answers should be switched
the blue one
i made the green one (the one with a dot, if you're color blind, idk)
then your answers are correct. maybe there’s like a space after the 2 you entered in or something idk. could be your teacher putting the wrong answer in
also ive never seen any of that before so idk
alr thanks
shit had me concerned
technically yes because
$|xy|\geq xy$
$\implies |xy|-xy\geq0$
$\implies 2|xy|-xy\geq|xy|$
but i’m not sure why you’d want to make that conclusion
Ryan
are the x-scale y-scales different? like on the axes i mean. can’t see the values with those white boxes in the way lol
personally i’d just add xy to both sides to cancel them out and be left with x^2 + y^2 >= 2|xy|
but i’d have to see the rest of the problem
can someone tell me what any of that means
it’s just algebra but slightly more higher level than what you’re doing
@quaint bronze Has your question been resolved?
aight
honestly this is review from last year so it might be what im doing this year
Closed by @quaint bronze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yes
The rest looks good yeah
Closed by @civic briar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Maybe mention that the inequality here flips because |r| < 1, but I'm just nitpicking here
Eh
That's common sense
At this level, doesn't make sense to justify algebraic manipulation
Unless it's particularly hard to follow
Yeah lmao makes sense
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
tried taking log both sides but it turns to something horrible
@stone holly Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone help with qn11 c the answer is 2215
Closed by @wary meadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need to find the domain and range
Okay so the domain is pretty straightforward. You just have to ask yourself “are there any values I can’t plug in to this function?” (Hint, you can’t plug in a value that would cause you to divide by 0)
Yeah so that would tell you the x values that are outside the domain of this function
so 30
Right, but is that the only value of sin that yields 1/2?
Right there’s another one. But remember sin is periodic so you can do another circle and keep looking for more
Are you comfortable with switching to radians? It’ll make explaining this a bit easier
yep
So those two values in radians are pi/6 and 5pi/6 right?
yeah
And a full circle is 2pi. So what about 2pi + pi/6?
That would also get 0 after taking the sin right?
yepp
As well as 2pi + 5pi/6.
And we could do that again with adding 4pi, 6pi, 8pi, and so on forever. AND with -2pi, -4pi and so on
then what would be the domain then
So you can express those values in general like so:
Let k be any arbitrary integer. sinx is 1/2 whenever x = pi/6 + 2pik, and whenever x = 5pi/6 + 2pik.
So the domain of f(x) is all real numbers except for those I just mentioned.
The range is more complicated. You have to ask yourself what values you will never see using this function. For starters, graphing it can give you an idea of what to look for here.
So clearly the range, being all possible y values, is every number except that strip in the middle that the function never touches right?
wait so is the range just -1/2, 2
The question in this case is how do you identify the top and bottom of that strip
So that’s clear to see from the graph, but now what if you didn’t have the graph to look at? Haha
The bottom looks a little lower than -1/2 though from the graph. That’s another thing to figure out analytically
im kind of confused
Yeah I haven’t explained how to find the range without looking at the graph. I just wanted you to get an idea for starters
So there’s multiple ways. What level class are you in? Is this calculus or something earlier?
Ahh okay then we can’t use any calculus techniques to get there. Let me remind myself how to solve this without calculus
Ahhhh yes that’s right. Write the function down as an equation, y=all that stuff
Just replace f(x) with y in other words.
Then, what you want to do is solve the equation for x instead of y.
ummm im still kind of confused 😭
One moment I’ll show ya
okok thank youuu btw
(Sorry for bad handwriting)
Let me know if these steps make sense. If so, I’ll explain why I did it.
wait so is the final thing the range then? but why do you have to solve for x again im so sorry im just rlly frazzled rn
You’re getting ahead. This is not the range but it’ll help us find it. For starters does all of that algebra I just did make sense to you?
yep it makes sense algebraically
Why solve for x:
This is called taking the inverse of the function. If we now, after that algebra, rename x to y and vice versa, we will have the inverse function of our original function. This helps us find the range because, crucially, the domain of the inverse of a function is the range of the original function (and, less usefully in this case, the opposite is also true that the range of the inverse is the domain of the original)
ohhh so do you just make the x into y and y into x after you set f(x) to y
Here, I’ve added that final step to avoid any confusion
So that function on the bottom is the inverse of the function on the top.
And knowing what I just said here
You can now use the same technique you used to find the domain, but on this inverse function, and that will tell you the original function’s range.
So ask yourself with this new function what values you can’t plug in
ohhh
This one is trickier because sin inverse, unlike sin, is not defined everywhere
That’s true but there’s a whole bunch of other values you can’t do because that stuff is inside of sin inverse
okay i get it up to this step then
bc how do i find the values that i cant do
bc of sin invers
Right, so sin inverse (on its own) is obviously the inverse or sin. Whats the range of regular old sin?
sinx, what’s the highest and lowest value that outputs?
(You can think about this in terms of the unit circle or the graph of sinx)
-1<=sinx<=1
Bingo. And because of this
We know that we can only plug in numbers between negative 1 and 1 to sin inverse
So then the domain of this whole inverse function is going to be all of the values x that make it so we take the inverse sin of a number between (and including) -1 and 1.
So to do that, solve for x in this compound inequality:
Very close
-2/3 to be clear
So taking a step back, that tells us that the domain of the inverse, and thus the range of our original function, is all values except those between -2/3 and 2
@forest shell Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @forest shell
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is the inner product just the dot product?
The dot product is a special case of inner products
inner products generalize the properties of dot products to more types of vectors, similar to how vector spaces generalize the properties of R^n
there are many different inner products, but the dot product is the most common type
the dot product is also called the "euclidian inner product" and is usually the "default" inner product for vectors in R^n
Okayy what other inner products are there?
For example in the vector space of real functions continuous on some closed interval you could define the inner product of two vectors to be the integral of their product over the interval in question
<f,g> = ∫[a,b] f*g dt right but what does it exactly tell me? it kinda confuses me..
similar to the dot product, it gives us a way to define an angle between two vectors, what it means for two vectors to be perpendicular, and a way to measure a vector's "length" with a norm
hmm
does this apply to functions aswell? like this?
like does this give me an angle?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @charred obsidian
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So im starting to learn mathematical symbols such as N natural numbers (1...10), Z for whole integers (-10...10). I only struggle to understand how rational and irrational numbers work? Such as Q, R, I
(1...10)?
natural numbers extend to infinity
from 1 to 10 and further
right
me when i dont include 0 in natural number set 😠
funny how that is, my book told me not to include it as a standard
rational numbers are just all numbers that can be written as a fraction of 2 whole integers
like 3/6
or (-7)/2
irrational numbers r basically numbers that cant be expressed as p/q where p and q r coprime integers
or even 6/1
a rational number is a number which can be expressed as a ratio/fraction of two integers, yes
Yes, those numbers
then an irrational number is any real number which is not rational
such as sqrt(2)
real numbers are?
or pi
all rationals + irrationals combined
ah i see
so basically real numbers but filter out the ones that are rational
yes
all the numbers you normally think of when we say "number", but excluding other number systems like complex numbers, etc.
all the real numbers have (sometimes infinite) decimal expansion.
Like
5.35235624512050713509531.......
3.141592653589.....
3
3.25
3.333333333333333333333333333
-2.513513415136416
etc
i might say something dumb now, but sqrt(3)/1 would be irrational as sqrt(3) isn't a whole integer
yes
reminds me of the joke where they say π is rational cuz π/1
of course something like 1.463/1 is also not a ratio of whole integers but we can easily write that as 1463/1000. another property of rational numbers is that their decimal expansion either ends or repeats itself infinitely
right, so to sum up
real numbers (R) are rational + irrational numbers (sqrt(3), 3/2)
rational numbers (Q) are numbers that can be written as a fraction as whole integers where the denominator != 0 (3/2, 1/2, 5/4)
irrational numbers (I) are real numbers that are not rational numbers (sqrt(3), pi, the golden ratio??)
yeah
although the definition is kinda cyclical
definining irrational numbers through real numbers and real numbers through irrational numbers
so we can say that
sqrt(3) is not in Q
i don't know how to write the e with a stripe
yep
I is somewhat rare for denoting the irrational numbers, more common is R\Q (real numbers excluding rationals)
oh right, \ is used for filtering correct?
N\Z = all positive numbers
almost
Z\N
right
0 is in this set but not in N
that would give all negative integers
you're right
how did I miss that
Z \ N gives the set of all whole numbers that are not in N
so in other words Z\N means take the set of all negative whole numbers and exclude all numbers that are positive
take the set of all whole numbers (Z) and exclude all the positive whole numbers (N)
ah
so that would mean that R\Q = I
alright nice
I think I'm starting to understand, thank you guys a lot!
I appreciate it
.close
Closed by @patent socket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i determine x^2y-x^2+4y =0 that y is a function of x
Do you mean "how to determine y as a function of x"?
uhh the question says determine whether y is a function of x
That makes little sense
will making this equation y=f(x) work?
You can make it a function of x, but whether it is is basically up to you
wait wdym
You can manipulate that equation x^2y-x^2+4y=0 into y = ..., with some x and no y on the right
(with an added constraint on x)
But x and y are usually just called variables
i think it just wants you to make
y(x) would be called a function (of x)
y the subject
Anyway, that's probably what the question is actually about, it's just phrased weird
do i just put y in terms of x then?
Yes, we call that "solving for y"
okay tyy
but then it says determine whtether it is
so whats an example of it not being a function of x
because the examples it gives you could put everything in terms of x
if it can be written
so that y can be separated
and be made a subject
then it can be a function
i imagine that is what it means
Can you screenshot the question?
its on paper and i dont have my phoneee
its just a series of equations and it asks if y can be function of x
it has to be in this case
can u give us
wait but one of them is y^2=x^2-1 can that be a function of x
other examples
you could just root both sides tho
i mean it can be
Well again, the phrasing is just weird
yeah the other ones y is already singled out so you could easily put it in terms of x
sooo
If you do y = sqrt(x^2-1), you lose information compared to y^2 = x^2-1
But it's still a function, in a way...
For x^2y-x^2+4y=0, if you transform this into y=<something> and nothing else, then you also lose information, though not quite as much
i think
But again it would still be a function
wait continue
ohhh now i get the question
yh go on
i hope
nono i c ur point cuz i googled it
and like its just if x theres only one value of y
right?
i think idk
yeah I suppose you're right
also i have another question
not related
but given that f(x)=sinx and g(x)=pi(x) what is f(g(x))
like is it just sin(pix)
idk how else to write it
like i thought it would be 0 but like what if x is a fraction
so liek do i just leave it like that
Yes it's just sin(pix)
@forest shell Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @forest shell
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is this a valid form of differential equation?
P(x) = k, isnt it required that it must be a function of x? both P(x) and Q(x). These 2 rules don't seem to be working here.
,, P(x) = k = kx^0
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
constant functions exist
@cunning rock Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
let x,y in ]-1, 1[ use this last step to complete the proof for |yx² - y + x| < 5/4: $$|y+1/(4y) - y(x+(1/2y))^2| < ? < 5/4$$
Goëtia
@tender cypress Has your question been resolved?
@tender cypress Has your question been resolved?
@tender cypress Has your question been resolved?
@tender cypress Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.