#help-10
1 messages · Page 162 of 1
oh ok
you give them f(x)
can you do an example?
ok
take sine function
sin(x) = sin(0)+sin'(0) * x + sin''(0)/2x^2 + ..= sin(0) + x - x^2/2 + ...
by writing this sum using the sigma notation
you get this
there is no easy way to get it, it's the definition of taylor expansion.
also how would I solve this without knowing that this was the taylor series of sinex
I'm not sure there is any way. It's certainly not elementary math
especially that you have pi there
im in calc || so if theres any method with that
first it was derivitves then intagrals, now series
its a past exam quesiron
oh so it covers all calculus right ?
it covers which part
the other question is taylor's inequality hahaha
;n;
they literally say power series, I can't imagine anyone taking a course in power series without knowing taylor expansion
if you check your notes you'll find them
so do I just have to memorize a bunch of them?
there are tricks to help you memorize, for example sine is an odd function, so it only has odd powers in its expansion
hence the 2n+1 in powers
what ones should i memorize?
cosine and sine are pretty important, 1/(1-x) also (but you already know it)
you can also memorize the general formula, and then find the expansions with it
Yw !
can you help me with another problem?
ok go ahead
question 1 on the exam
just factorize with 1/10 and use the expansion of 1/(1+x)
whats that
unrelated, but why was 0 used
any number can be used i think, but 0 simplifies things
why is the plus or minus sign upside dwon
this probably depends on the radius of convergence, but this is another animal
ahh, that makes sense. Does that mean 180 can be used as well, since it would be equivalent
1/(1+x) = 1-x+x^2-x^3+x^4 - ...., upside down means we start with minus
yeah probably, but not with all functions I htink
yea, fair enough, thanks for clarifying
this need a pen and paper lol
lol
write the sum by writing the symbols (like you would with a pen)
not using latex or some shit
convergence and divergence depend on the values of x
that's what a radius of convergence means
you don't, they're asking your for the power series expansion ,and the interval of convergence
just keep x
interval of convergence = interval of x where the series is convergent
ya
this is a full course on power series, take your time
wait i'll draw a solution in my computer, I am lazy bastard
lol
You should show your work rather than ask for a full on solution
work out the rest
Screenshot and upload and ask questions about it
If the professor gives a solution, you should understand it that way first
?
Do you have a question
ok so you do this, then you plus a=10 into that equasion over there
then what
this is the answer btw
this looks false, not sure though
thats what my friends been saying
hes been working on this all night going crazy saying that this is wrong
@tardy epoch am I allowed to post the full solutin
wow it shouldn't be this hard but yeah he's right, this answer is false
who's the bastard who wrote this
lol mr. lang is a bastard
yes
he bastardizes his students lol
oh he should be in a bad mood then
24/7
get what ?
the series
taylor lol
lol
gimme a practice problem
about taylor ym
sure
you can find this stuff in the internet
ya
with practice problems
they asked me to choose my role when i joined the forum
i mean the group
oh lol
it's probably a new thing
nvm
because I joined it before
Closed by @tepid urchin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @vital frost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm not sure about my answer
sort of
ok
Imagine "the lever" along with the square being rotated in the direction of the arrow (ccw)
They're basically asking how much do you need to rotate until the square reaches the 4th quadrant
ok
How much do you think it needs to rotate?
about 90
so 180 so that it can reach the 4 quadrant
no
Ah
doing my assignment
I thought I'd tell you to try rotating your phone 180° and see where the square ends up
But you can't really do that on a pc
unless you rotate your head?
Closed by @lost wharf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
anyobody know how to get started on this
Do you know the formulas for going back and forth between polar and cartesian coordinates?
no i dont think i recall
I think that's where I would start
@warm siren Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @warm siren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi would it be possible to get some help here. im trying to see how the transfer function (marked 2) comes from its laplace transform above. i cant seem to understand. would be helpful if someone could show me the steps taken to reach the 2nd transfer function (marked 2)
this one
@pallid vapor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A golf ball is struck from a point 23m to the left of the hole and lands at a point 17m to the right of the hole. It reaches a maximum height of 10m
-Determine an equation to represent the path of the golf ball
-When the ball is directly above the hole, how high in the air is it?
if anyone could do step by step with me that'd be appreciated
@silent perch Has your question been resolved?
@silent perch Has your question been resolved?
Is this all the question asks, is there like lore behind this
can i see
ok wait are you american
Canadian
is this mechanics
point on the left is 23,0 I think and point on the right is 17,0
ok 1 sec
ok
Rip
i got it
😋
Ok my walk through was a bit messy tho
have you heard of completing the square
ok i hope you can read this
if u want a better step by step tell me before i go sleep ok bye
@silent perch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i use universal generalization like this? I was trying to prove how a universal conditional statement is logically equivalent to its contrapositive and used universal generalization to do that
@karmic vale Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
this seems about right
@karmic vale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how was this solved?
wdym
like create the riemann sum?
ah so
20-10/2
= delta x
@timid silo so upperestimate
would be
10+(k-1)deltax
and lower estimate
a+kdeltax
?
where n = 6
then just multiply it out and use the rules
and plug in n
how?
lower bound starts at 10 yea
wdym as height
you mean delta x?
top is
lower bound
bottom is upper bound
right ? @timid silo
are u sure?
the answer is -32
and 8
what
im so confused
how do we solve this
bro what
hannibal
yea
wb it
delta x = 5
where did the 2 come from
and n = 2
so delta x = 5
yea
2 = n
not delta x
b-a/n is the formula
how?
oh yea ur right
the width is 2
mb
i mistakened that
oh i see
Oh
i get it now
we just multiply
it by delta x
and lower estimate would just be x= 18 and under
upper would be x = 20
@spark field Has your question been resolved?
yes it is
its from x=10 to x= 18
and its 8
for when
x = 10 to x= 20
this just means find the antidervative right?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wb midpoint
how would this work
ik
so i start from 14?
im confused because we just estimated by f(x) * deltax
hannibal
oooh
so deltax = 1
then
wait no
18-10/5
ok so
18-10/5
then divide it agian
by 2
right
so delta x = .8
?
um what
?
subtract upper and lower
then divide by 2
-12
which sint correct
yea
but that wouldnt really work
💀
we are given f(x) number
wdym middle of interval
yea
wb it
ur not supposed to predicut f(x)
answer is -20
<@&286206848099549185>
any1 know
go watch a video on how to do a midpoint riemann sum
for example the video that you linked a screenshot of
This calculus video tutorial provides a basic introduction into the midpoint rule which is used to approximate the area under the curve. This video explains how to use the midpoint rule to estimate the area of a region using rectangles and how to confirm the approximate integration by evaluating the definite integral over the closed interval. ...
true i forgot he does it using this way
organic chem
the formula is diff when we have f(x) so i didnt know how to do it when we are giving the value of f(x)
It's not different
for each rectangle f(x) is the height
so like just looking at the picture for the video above
f(x_i)
say i=1
this means f(1)
which is the height of the rectangle at x=1
which is just given in your table
but if it wasn't, you would just plug x=1 into your function
yet the formula remains the same
Watching the video should clear up your confusions.
@spark field Has your question been resolved?
@spark field Has your question been resolved?
@spark field Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve this question?
i know A is circle and B is ellipse
i understand they are asking in which points they will intersect
both are centered at (0, 0). So you dont even need to perform calculations
but how do i know where they will intersect what if circle is bigger and doesn't intersect at all
You know their equations so you know them. Most notably the radii so you can draw them
not one of the possible answers, but if you want you can do some calculations and see that they do intersect
you can just treat this as a system of equations lmfao
how do i do that ?

You can either use substitution, or subtract/add those equations
i don't know much about in these circles and ellipses so can u explain more?
are you familiar with solving simultaneous equations? using substitution/subtraction?
x^2+y^2=25, this is the circle
x^2+9y^2=144, this is the ellipse
To find the intersection, you need to find points (x, y) such that they lie on both the circle, and ellipse. I.e. they satisfy those equations
so just solve system of those equations
no
ok first i will learn about solving these eqs
sorry my battery is at 5% and I cant charge it rn, bye
what’d they teach you in school, before they gave you this problem?
this question is not from a school i am just self studying rn
look up how to solve systems of equations
Closed by @pure yarrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, is there any way to solve this aside from multiplying everything first then finding lcm?
well you could break the 6^1 into 2^1 * 3^1
so that the first number there is actually factored into primes and doesnt just appear as such
so it would be 2^3, 3^5, 2^4, 5^1, 3^2
then what?
oh nvm i got it
thanks for that saved me
.close
Closed by @dry arrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
i need a little bit of helping differentiating these types of problems
for example f(x) = 3x/(x^2+16)^1/2
do you know about the various rules of differentiation
yes
what do you need help with then
i guess just executing them properly
here we go
so 3x * (x^2+16)^-1/2
product rule
or just quotient rule
u think thats better?
i mean you won’t have to work with a negative power
thats true
okay so [1/2 * (x^2 +16)^-1/2 *2x (3x) ] - [3(x^2+16)^1/2]
all over x^2+16
correct so far?
you’re doing product rule?
quotient rule is minus
and it’s $\frac {f’(x)g(x) - f(x)g’(x)}{g(x)^{2}}$
! saad
yes
okay so after simplifying a little further i get 3x/sqrt(x^2+16) - 3sqrt(x^2+16)
over x^2 +16
use more brackets or type in latex or on a piece of paper
how do u do the texit thing
enclose in $
$\frac{3(x^2+16)^{1/2}- 3x^{2}(x^2+16)^{-1/2}}{x^2+16}}$
\sqrt not /sqrt
also \sqrt{...} not \sqrt(...)
also i think you forgot to take the derivative of the root at one point
enclose powers in {}
.
f’(x)g(x) - f(x)g’(x)
you didn’t differentiate the sqrt properly either
Isn't f'(x) 2x in this case? If f(x) = x^2
oh dang
it’ll be chain rule and power rule
one moment while i redo this
f(x) = 3x, i think
Oh
this is the original function
yes, 3x
okay here we go
you forgot chain rule, again
no i simplified
stop skipping steps, i can’t follow your logic
write out the quotient rule as you would
then you can simplify
alrighty
Blackbeard
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
look good?
yes
you could’ve separated the 3 earlier actually
constant multiple rule
easier to differentiate
you can get rid of the negative power
by square root right
it just goes to the denominator and becomes square root $\frac {1}{2 \sqrt{x^{2}+16}}$
! saad
why a 2
Question: is the final answer
$$\frac{3-3x}{\sqrt{x^2 + 16}}$$
$\frac {1}{2} \cdot (x^{2} + 16)^{- \frac {1}{2}}$
$\frac {1}{2 \sqrt{x^{2}+16}}$
! saad
since theres a 2x after it the 1/2 and 2 cancel out
and the 1/2
so you’ll just have 3x^2 in the numerator
yup
Blackbeard
okay so now i have $\frac{{3}{/sqrt{x^{2}+16}}$
```Compilation error:```! File ended while scanning use of \frac .
<inserted text>
\par
<*> 786751657316581406.tex
I suspect you have forgotten a `}', causing me
to read past where you wanted me to stop.
I'll try to recover; but if the error is serious,
you'd better type `E' or `X' now and fix your file.```
yes
Got the correct answer (confirmed on mathway) u can simplify by letting sqrt (x2 + 16) = u
what do u mean = u
declare a new variable u
U substitute u for sqrt (x^2 + 16)
why would i do that?
simplifies the fraction, ig
you cant just multiply by the denominator or something
A simpler to write and b simpler to use laws to simplify
I can send a pic of my simplification procedure if u want
Yeah
Closed by @faint ore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Calculate the double integral with A limited by x^2=4-2y
rainy
So far, ive graphed it
Dont understand what limits you fill in for what integral :\
HELP
Can you use other channel pls
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
you get help
Calculate the double integral with A limited by x^2=4-2y
Need help with the limits of integration
@night lotus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what would you sub?
Closed by @gusty tartan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
so what is y' in x and v
thats where im up to
well the confident up to
i did stuff past that but i have no idea waht i was doing
U can divide both sides by x and integrate
y' = 2-(y/x)?
Mhm
U can treat as x as a constant, then integrate (btw not sure if this turns into a double integral)
@gusty tartan still stuck?
@gusty tartan Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @gusty tartan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what will be the explicit form of this?
is that multiplication?
yeah the dot symbolises multiplication
! saad
my first thought was that its the product of i and j taken two at a time (i not equal to j) subtracted from the square of the sum of the first n natural numbers
could u tell me how you got to this?
Who can help me pythagorean theorem
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
ah i see... i shall try to get to this result
could u tell me what is the exact question is? i can try to help
fäf
Try it first cuz I'm not entirely sure
You must be knowing the last two sums
I assume
yes... i tried it... im getting rlly close so ig its right
Alright
It's easy from there
yes i got it
yeah turns out i made a silly mistake
thanks a lot!!
.close
Closed by @slender chasm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone put me in the right direction?
its supposed to be solved with graph theory
@mental cosmos Has your question been resolved?
@mental cosmos Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mental cosmos
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Just to double check. {h(1),h(2)}={1,2}
Means all the pairing between the two sets right including h(1)=2
That implies h(1) = 1 and h(2) = 2 or h(1) = 2 and h(2) = 1
So, no, h(1) = 2 is not impossible
Oh I read that as "excluding" 
Yeah, anyways, h(1) = 2 is possible
@toxic hollow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello,
I am currently watching 3b1b's video on eigenvectors and values, but my question is regarding change of basis matrices.
In the video he uses the new basis vectors directly as his change_of_basis_matrix, but isnt it needed to first setup a system of linear equations with the ( new basis on the left | old basis on the right ) and solving that as shown in the second image?
Im still not a 100% percent sure on how to obtain the transformation matrix needed.
sure but in the 3b1b video his "old" basis is the standard basis and the eigenvectors are already written in this standard basis so you're skipping that step because there's nothing to do
@gloomy glen Has your question been resolved?
so what exactly is the old and new basis? in this case?
in 3b1b vid its the standard basis and the eigenbasis
so the new basis = eigenbasis is
(1 -1)
(0 1) ?
(-1 1) but yeah
yes
and where is the
(3 1)
(0 2)
coming from?
if
(1 0)
(0 1)
already is the old basis
thats the matrix representing the linear map with respect to the standard basis
youre right, im sorry
I totally forgot that there is still a difference between the matrix representing the linear map and the basis which defines how vectors are formed based on given coordinates
once you fix a basis, the columns of the matrix are telling you what happens to those basis vectors under the transformation
Yes.
So I use the current basis and the new basis to calculate a transformation Matrix B.
Then I multiply the current Matrix A:
B-1 * A * B and get the Matrix A' for the new basis, right?
a couple seconds after that screenshot he'll say that product is equal to (3 0 ; 0 2) which is precisely telling you the eigenvectors (a basis now) get scaled up by their eigenvalues
correct
B will take you "from the new basis to the old" (this at first seems kind of backwards but it is the correct way)
this makes sense, B takes you back to your old basis, A is the matrix of the map in terms of the old basis, and then B^-1 takes you back to the new basis
This topic is a lot to keep in mind and connect haha
but thank you
change of basis is notoriously one of the hardest things to get your head around in linear algebra
and in which order do i multiply these matrices?
the order they're written
B^-1AB
(because transformations get applied right to left)
so first B * A? and then that * B^-1.
The last thing im struggling with atm is:
"B takes you back to your old basis, A is matrix in terms of the old basis, and then B^-1 takes you back to the new basis"
appplying the matrix X and then the matrix Y is the same as applying the matrix YX
things are applied from right to left
multiplication is associative so it doesnt matter how you actually compute ZYX as long as its in that order
One last question 😅 .
The way i understood it in lectures was actually this way. With B^-1 we transform coordinates from the new basis into the old. Than we put these values into the matrix "from the old basis" and then we use B to turn the old coordinates into the ones in the new basis
does it make sense this way around? Or should i try to understand it in another way.
B^-1 A B is the same as B A B^-1 right?
this is correct and agrees with what I have been saying
this is not correct, those are two different matrices because XY is not YX in general
because u said B^-1 takes me back to my new basis, but i said B^-1 transforms from new basis to old basis. And in 3b1b screenshot B^-1 is the matrix on the left not on the right.
im sorry im just a bit confused
ehh this is subtle
it depends on what you have defined B to be
either its "the new basis vectors written in terms of the old" and then what I said is correct
or its "the old basis vectors written in term of the new" and then its what you said
Im sry to waste ur time,
But somehow the way i think seems to be flipped haha.
In these screenshots we have A (old base) and B (new base). We make a set of linear equations with B on the left and A on the right. In the end we get TA->B. This Matrix shows coordinates in base B in terms of coordinates in base A right?
Now what I want to do is:
TA->B * L * TB->A = TA->B * L * TA->B^-1
your issue here is that A and B are not bases
in R^3 you need 3 vectors for a basis and then your change of basis matrix will be 3x3
Lets think of it as R^2 then. I just want to know about my concept
Maybe I should just stop for today and take another look tomorrow
.close
Closed by @gloomy glen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do you know what g'(x) and g''(x) represent?
you have to know general behaviors of square and cubic functions. and also the general patterns that derivatives follow.
whats the derivative of f(x)=x^3
@magic goblet Has your question been resolved?
do you know what the graphs of x^3, x^2, and wave (trig) functions look like? this should be pretty recognizable if you are familiar.
and if you understand the pattern that derivatives take and what they represent, it just takes a little bit of thought to imagine what the derivatives would be with just these graphs.
you really don't know what b could be?
@magic goblet Has your question been resolved?
@magic goblet Has your question been resolved?
@magic goblet Has your question been resolved?
@magic goblet Has your question been resolved?
@magic goblet Has your question been resolved?
Thus is mostly correct. Look at a.iii and c.i again
Not sure what #4 is asking you to do
0 isn't an option. You have to say if it's a min/max/inflection
Is the function going up or down for ci
Increasing or decreasing?
I think he was talking about at the point
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
f(x)=2x^3+1/x
find f(-x)
find -f(x)
@stone gorge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
for the first one, plug in -x to f(x)
-2x^3-1/x?
is it the same?
alright thank you so nova
.close
Closed by @stone gorge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @little lava
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

how do you find the tangent line of y^2(y^2-1)=x^2tan(y) at (0,1)
tangent line equation
y-y1=f'(x1)(x-x1)
what have u tried @karmic reef
Stephen
Sorry was in the restroom
I mean ill try implicit differentiation
D/dx(y^2(y^2-1))=d/dx(x^2tan(y)
Left hand side product rule
nah dont do product rule on the left, just distribute the y^2, makes it easier
Oh lol
I didn’t think to
D(y)^2/dx =d/dx(x^2tan(y))
Right hand side product rule
can u do the whole thing on paper so i can just look it over all at once
or using latex
Can u refoward ur latex but using back ticks
Or a way so the bot doesnt embed it
So i can copy the syntax
$y^2(y^2-1)=x^2 \tan(y)$
$\frac (dy^2) (dx)=d/dx(x^2 \tan(y))$
HeccinTech
$\frac{dy^2}{dx} = \frac{d}{dx}x^2\tan(y)$
zfnQRZJT
?
No no
I mean
Yes
But i mean this is wrong in context of the work i posted like with my hand writing
Not what i posted
Thank u though
alr
do u still need help?
take your time
it seems you lost a y^2 - 1 on the left side
also for implicit differentiation d/dx of something that involves y remember you need the chain rule
Thats because i distributed the y^2
y^4 - y^2?
well you just
didn't write that
He told me here
To do it that way
(also, just a notational thing, dy^2 usually means (dy)^2)
as in the denominator of the 2nd derivative operator
yea by distributing the y^2, i meant to do y^2 multiplied by y^2 -1, which is y^4 - y^2

yep
im confused lol. how did u interpret my message?
you still aren't getting the y^4 - y^2 on the left
distribute the y^2 as i suggested here
Oh i thought they simplified
wh
Thanks
Wouldnt i write it as
No wait
Why would I differentiate the left side again
I dont think u can differentiate y with the derivative respect to x as in apply any rules besides it being dy/dx
Im only taking the first derivative
So its already differentiated
what is d/dx of y^4
power and chain rule
Is it dy/dx *4y^3
yee
Now how can i get dydx on its own side
My guess is subtract the x^2sec^2(y)*dy/dx and factor out dy/dx and divide by the inside on the other side
But that still leaves me with ys on one side
Can you plugin ys

now you can finish
Closed by @karmic reef
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
lets look at c first
gimme one sec while i write it out
+2e^x
wait
forgot to distrbute the -, whoops
there is a continuation of ibp, the di method
it makes these repeated ibps faster
integrals?
you can learn them rn, its very easy actually
just an area function
i highly recommend khan academy if you want to
well, if you know derivatives, you can already solve integrals with the fundamental theorems of calculus
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fluid sandal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help with this one?
You don't have to solve the entire problem, I just need a procedure or hints
what is z in this context?
this looks like a typical line integral, so we can just parameterize C
what i dont get is why we do a . on a scalar
z=(x,y)?
there has to be some context about z somewhere
Z = x+iy
This is problem is from Complex Integration
(Please ping me when you reply)
@timid silo
heres a hint, we know (a(theta-sin(theta)) , a(1-cos(theta)) goes from (0,0) to (2pi a,0)
it is not too hard to solve for theta here and find bounds a and b, we are also parameterized
let z=x+yi, then we may use the following picture with u(t)=x(theta), v(t)=y(theta)
I think this means that we should substitute x = a(theta-sin theta) and y = ...... in the problem right?
yeah
But
you do d theta
It becomes very lengthy by doing that
its an integral theta dtheta, sin(theta)dtheta, dtheta, cos(theta)dtheta, these arent that long
the only lengthy one is solving for theta's bounds
but we are given 0,0 which is easy to solve, only solving the upper bound will be lengthy
I think upper bound for theta is 2pi
Maybe that wasn't the lengthy part
Expanding z^3 then substituting x and y in it goes long
I tried writing x = sin alpha = a(theta-sin theta)
But it doesn't work
Such alpha doesn't exist
<@&286206848099549185>
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
You could use Cauchy's theorem
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fluid sandal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is solution idk from the red line how they set up that equation
<@&286206848099549185>
Define collinear
What does that mean in terms of the arithmetic
Ok great!!!
so CB = kAB
Or in other words, the RATIO between components is constant
So like how about this just to show you what I mean
Lets say we have the two vectors (1,2) and (2,4)
1:2
Wouldn't any collinear vector satisfy:
y component is ALWAYS twice x component
ok
So then
ok
I was just using the (1,2) as an example
alight
(a component of CB) / (b component of CB) =
(a component of AB) / (b component of AB)
ok
Plug in the numbers now
Do you know what I mean by components?
no
don't vectors in 2D have to be described by two numbers
in this case we're treating a and b as our basis VECTORS
So what multiplies the a is the a component, and what multiplies the b is the b component
The a component of CB is -3k
how is it over -2
yes i understnad that
Use this equation
Now that you hopefully understand what the word component means
still dont understand the 2 and -2
i undersntad the numerators now
but denominators
dk
What are the a and b components for the vector AB
2- 9k and -3k
what multiplies the a is the a component, and what multiplies the b is the b component


