#help-10

1 messages · Page 24 of 1

timid silo
#

but i dont think i am right

#

can i have some advice

timid silo
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

from the left use -(1+x) and from the right (1+x)

#

well either way it will diverge (if i can see it correctly)

#

Wdym by diverge

#

Also wouldn’t it just be undefined limit ?

timid silo
hardy widget
#

Should be that it doesn't exist

#

,w limit of (x^2 - 2)/(|1+x|) as x approaches-1

timid silo
#

Yeah ?

warm shaleBOT
timid silo
#

yes divergent means that it doesnt exist (or goes to infinity)

#

Wait I’m getting positive infinity?

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @devout tapir

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

strange yoke
obtuse pebbleBOT
strange yoke
#

I put the question on the left, I don't understand what Im doing wrong

#

I divided every term by x^2 because its the highest power

cedar lichen
#

6 and 6/x² are not the same thing

strange yoke
#

I divided every term by x^2

#

so 6 turned into 6/x^2

cedar lichen
#

No you didn't

#

For the second fraction, you divided the top and bottom by x²

#

That's the same as dividing by 1

#

Besides, there's no need to divide at all

#

What's the lim x -> ∞ of 6?

strange yoke
#

6?

#

i thought I had to divide. that's how i was taught l'hopital rule and i thought i had to do that here

cedar lichen
#

There's no need for l'h here

#

It doesn't even apply, in fact

strange yoke
#

why not

#

x is approaching infinity

cedar lichen
#

L'h only applies in indeterminate forms

#

0/0, ∞/∞, etc

#

You don't have that

#

Besides, you wouldn't just be dividing by something. You'd divide the top and bottom by something, which doesn't change the fraction

#

Now, what's lim x->∞ 2/x²?

strange yoke
#

thats weird in my notes we used l'hopitals rule but the problems dont look like theyre indeterminate

#

thatd be 0

#

so the answer would be 6 cause 6+0

cedar lichen
#

They should be if you're applying l'h

#

And yes, the final answer's 6

strange yoke
#

the problem that we started practicing lh with is x/(x^2+5)

#

as x is apporaching infinity

#

is that indeterminate

cedar lichen
#

That's ∞/∞

strange yoke
#

howd you get that

cedar lichen
#

The numerator goes to ∞ and the denominator goes to ∞

strange yoke
#

why do they become infinity

#

oh because direct subsition

cedar lichen
#

You technically can't directly substitute infinity, but it's the same idea

strange yoke
#

ok so when i approach limit problems with infinity, i should try to "substitute" the infinity for x, and only use lh if its indeterminate, right?

cedar lichen
#

Yes

#

L'h gives wrong answers otherwise, since it only applies to indeterminate forms

#

It also only applies to single fractions. So if you had two fractions added together, you'd have to either combine them, or apply l'h twice

strange yoke
cedar lichen
#

Yep

#

You can't apply l'h to either, since neither are indeterminate

#

Also, and this is just my opinion, but I personally think you shouldn't resort to l'h unless you can't do it any other way. It gives the same answer, but I don't like l'h being used as a sort of crutch

strange yoke
#

if there was an x in the numerator and denominator then thatd be indeterminate right

cedar lichen
#

Yeah, but then you could just cancel them. Depends on how the x's are placed, I suppose

strange yoke
cedar lichen
#

Depends on the situation

#

For rational functions, there's factoring, for instance

#

If you're going to infinity, you can divide the numerator and denominator by the highest power

#

If there's square roots, there's some possibility for simplification there

#

There's lots of different things

cedar lichen
#

That's not l'h

#

L'h is when you take the derivative of the numerator and denominator

strange yoke
#

i dont think i was taught the right thing

#

i dont even know what a derivative is

cedar lichen
#

If you don't know what a derivative is, then you definitely were not taught l'h

strange yoke
#

this is overwhelming

#

i dont know ill try to figure it out

#

thanks for the help though

cedar lichen
#

The method you believed was l'h works for all rational functions when x-> ± ∞ btw

#

Not just indeterminate

strange yoke
#

like the thing where i can cross out 6/x^2 and make it 0?

cedar lichen
#

That's more just a general rule than anything

#

It's more like if you have (2x² + x)/(x² + 1), you could divide the top and bottom by x²

strange yoke
#

does it have to be indeterminate?

cedar lichen
#

No

strange yoke
#

so indeterminate only matters for lh rule?

cedar lichen
#

Yes

#

Which you'll presumably learn later

strange yoke
#

I hope so

#

its just overwhelming for me cause we were taught it was lhopital and it really isnt so now i dont even know what i know

cedar lichen
#

Yeah idk what your teacher is thinking

strange yoke
#

ive tried watching some videos online about lh and i dont understand it but ill try to spend some more time watching and see if i can understand

cedar lichen
#

Lh requires knowledge of derivatives first

#

So you probably won't be able to understand it now

strange yoke
#

i'll look into it

#

thanks

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @strange yoke

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rapid kindle
#

does anyone know how to approach this problem? i know it has something to do with optimization but im not sure how to work through it

rapid kindle
#

the answer is 300 euros and 220 passengers

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@rapid kindle Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@rapid kindle Has your question been resolved?

hardy widget
#

Then, the price is 500-10x

#

And the tickets sold is 180+2x

#

So the revenue is (500-10x)(180+2x)

#

You can expand and complete the square, and you should get this

#

,w maximize (500-10x)(180+2x)

warm shaleBOT
hardy widget
#

🤔

#

Hold on

#

The answer is wrong lol

#

300 Euros and 220 passengers means 66000

#

But 500 eurosand 180 passengers means 90000

rapid kindle
#

international baccalaureate math moment

#

¯_(ツ)_/¯

#

i graphed the (500+10x)(180-2x) and got (20, 98000) as the maximum as well

hardy widget
#

🤷

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

opal wagon
#

hello

obtuse pebbleBOT
opal wagon
#

so lets say I bought a lightbulb and it will stop working on the 12500th day

#

what day of the week is 12500th day on?

#

how can I figure that out?

high lily
#

check remainder when divided by 7

opal wagon
#

ok its 1785.71429

#

so we can say 1785?

#

then what

high lily
#

find the remainder

opal wagon
#

oh

#

k

#

5

#

is the remainder

#

so its friday?

#

so how does it work

#

how does finding the remainder give us the answer

high lily
#

consider the number of days in a week

opal wagon
#

oh

high lily
#

so its friday?
depends on what day you start on

opal wagon
#

its on the 7th day

#

1785

#

and then p;us

#

plus 5 days is friday

#

right?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@opal wagon Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @opal wagon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

barren junco
obtuse pebbleBOT
barren junco
#

m=1

4=3(1)+b

1=b

y=x+1

y=-x

-x=x+1

-2x=1

x=-1/2

y=1/2

(1/2,-1/2)(3,4)

#

thats what i got

#

i got it wron

#

g

#

idk how to do fraction distances

#

could someone help

fierce lagoon
# barren junco

I would just find the perpendicular line that crosses through (3,4).

This line and y = -x will intersect at (a,b); you can use distance formula there on

#

Which is what you seem to have done but uh

fierce lagoon
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@barren junco Has your question been resolved?

barren junco
#

but i got 26.5

#

are the points correct?

fierce lagoon
#

Points are correct

#

You did distance formula incorrectly though

#

It's definitely not 26.5

barren junco
#

i need a unit answer tho

#

so im kinda confused

#

its 3-(-1/2)+4-1.2

fierce lagoon
#

There are no units

barren junco
#

3.5 and 3.5

fierce lagoon
#

No

barren junco
#

its asking for a unit answer

fierce lagoon
#

Well distance formula

barren junco
fierce lagoon
#

What is $\sqrt{3.5^2 + 3.5^2}$

warm shaleBOT
#

Umbraleviathan

fierce lagoon
#

But also like

barren junco
#

24.5 but i already tried that

fierce lagoon
#

4-(1/2) is 2.5

#

Not 3.5

barren junco
#

h o w

fierce lagoon
#

Wdym how is 4-(1/2) = 2.5 lol

barren junco
#

thats the equivalent to 4-(.5)

fierce lagoon
#

Oh I'm blind

#

Ignore that lol

barren junco
#

ive been stuck on this for like 2 days id ont know how to do it if theres fractions involved

fierce lagoon
#

I saw the 1.2 and thought of 1.2 but mistaken the 2 is 1/2

fierce lagoon
#

Recall that $\sqrt{a^2 + a^2} = a\sqrt{2}$

barren junco
#

what the fuck

warm shaleBOT
#

Umbraleviathan

barren junco
#

idk what that is

#

ok

#

uh

#

idk how to do that

fierce lagoon
#

Somewhere you miscalculated the square root

#

Use your calculator

barren junco
#

ion got one

fierce lagoon
#

Online

#

Use desmos

barren junco
#

how do i turn 3.5^2+3.5^2 into a square root

fierce lagoon
#

sqrt

barren junco
#

oh fuck

fierce lagoon
#

sqrt(3.5^2 + 3.5^2)

barren junco
#

no ownder i was getting this bs wrong

#

i never squared it

fierce lagoon
#

You never took the square root

barren junco
#

god damn im dumb

#

jesus christ

fierce lagoon
#

It happens

barren junco
#

i was thinkin it was there for deco lmfao

fierce lagoon
#

I mean I legit did just say 4-(1/2) = 2.5

#

So like

#

Fuck ups happen lol

barren junco
#

people make mistakes ig

#

alr thats my problem why i was stuck on it for so long

#

ty

fierce lagoon
#

Np

barren junco
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @barren junco

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

obtuse pebbleBOT
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@gritty onyx Has your question been resolved?

tardy epoch
obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @gritty onyx

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

im working on another integral hw. how would i go about integrating this?

ruby path
#

Use u sub

timid silo
#

below are my steps

#

-cos(2t) evaluated at pi/2 - -cos(2t) evaluated at 0

ruby path
#

No

timid silo
#

?

ruby path
#

Use u sub

#

Take 2t = u and then try

ruby path
#

Learnt u sub

#

I'll give you a shortcut

timid silo
#

we havent

ruby path
#

Ah

#

Alright

#

So listen

#

Whenever you have a linear function inside of another function, you need to integrate the major function and divide by the derivative of the linear function. That will give you the integral for the whole thing

#

In this case, sin 2t is the major function and 2t is the linear function

timid silo
#

ohhhh

ruby path
#

So what would the integral be?

timid silo
#

-cos(2t)/2

ruby path
#

Yup

#

Now you can evaluate the limits

#

And remember, this ONLY works for linear functions

timid silo
#

-cos(pi)/2 + 1/2

ruby path
timid silo
#

yep i got it

ruby path
#

$(-\frac{\cos \pi}{2}) - (-\frac{\cos 0}{2})$

#

Sorry for the slow LaTeX I'm not at my PC

timid silo
#

all good

#

i got 2pi/2 for the first part

#
  • cos pi/2
ruby path
timid silo
#

then i did leave change change for the signs

warm shaleBOT
#

NEONPerseus

timid silo
#

-cos pi/2 + cos0/2

#

cospi is just -1

#

cos0 is just 1

ruby path
#

Yup

timid silo
#

1/2 + 1/2 = 1

ruby path
#

Good going

timid silo
#

thanks

#

you are the best

ruby path
#

no u

timid silo
#

i didnt use simplified form originally

#

the system still accepted it

#

LOL

#

but its always a good idea to simplify

ruby path
#

xd lucky

#

Yes it is

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @thin pivot

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bleak eagle
#

I would really appreciate some guidance on some questions about generalizing the convergence or divergence in the iteration of linear functions

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@bleak eagle Has your question been resolved?

bleak eagle
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @bleak eagle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

void narwhal
obtuse pebbleBOT
void narwhal
#

why this don't have some function infront of the $rdrd\theta$

warm shaleBOT
void narwhal
#

cuz i saw some double integrals in terms of polar cords, they wrote in this way

paper socket
#

Not sure I understand the question

#

You don’t need anything in front of rdrdtheta

#

You’re calculating area as well

#

Opposed to volume

void narwhal
paper socket
paper socket
#

And then there would just be rdrdtheta again

void narwhal
#

sorry but i dont understand well yet

rich sparrow
#

You can write anything you want in the function you're trying to integrate

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@void narwhal Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @void narwhal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

trim jay
obtuse pebbleBOT
trim jay
#

I have no idea how should i approach this question

#

can anyone guide me through this?

bleak eagle
#

Try multiplying by the conjugate. So multiply by (7+sqrt10)/(7+sqrt10)

trim jay
#

ok ill try that

#

wait im confused.

#

I dont think it should work like this. Would you explain further so that i can understand more?

#

im not good in math, maybe you could explain it in a way that a kid would understand

bleak eagle
#

So you know how (x-1)*(x+1) = (x^2) - 1 if you foil it out?

trim jay
#

yepp

bleak eagle
#

It’s the same idea. You had the right idea in the pic you sent, except you did minus instead of plus

trim jay
#

oh

#

im still confused about why and how should i do that though.

#

would you explain more to me?

bleak eagle
#

So the question asks you to rationalize the denominator, which means you want to make sure that no square root signs appear in the denominator

trim jay
#

are we trying to cancel out the 7-(sqrt10) ?

bleak eagle
#

It’s okay if there is square roots in the numerator, but not the denominator

trim jay
bleak eagle
#

Yes exactly

trim jay
#

ill try again, hold on

#

here, is it correct?

bleak eagle
#

Yep that’s right

trim jay
#

oh i see now

#

but how do i know when i should use the "(x-1)*(x+1) = (x^2) - 1" method you taught me?

bleak eagle
#

It depends on how high of a level you get into mathematics, but at this level, anytime you see the words “rationalize the denominator”, that should be the first thing you try

trim jay
#

thank you so much, i understand now : )

#

Would you mind me asking a new question?

#

It says i need to solve it by completing the square, but the answer shows a quadratic formula used. What should i do?

small thicket
#

i mean if u can only ansewr in quadratic formula

#

use quadratic formula

bleak eagle
#

Yep agreed

trim jay
#

oh alright then, ill do that

#

Thanks

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @trim jay

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

violet prism
obtuse pebbleBOT
small thicket
violet prism
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @violet prism

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

violet prism
#

greatest common devisor

#

i understand now but thanks anyway

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

royal basin
#

well, how will you prove Q* isn't cyclic?

#

if you can prove that then you will have your nonisomorphism

#

...wait hold on

#

you confused me on the notation a little

#

is Q* meant to be Q \ {0}?

#

then (Q*, +) isn't a group at all!

#

do you have the problem exactly as written

#

to ensure this is a fuckup on the teacher's part and not on yours

#

post it here

#

okay yeah

#

the correct answer is "(Q*, +) is not a group at all"

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @white basin

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

onyx folio
#

for the part in the general term, I don't understand how 11 was distributed to (n-1) and the final when simplified became 11n-5

worn swan
#

bc d=11

#

you substitute that and get 6+11(n-1)

#

using distributive property

#

you multiply 11 by both n and -1

#

and get 6*+11n-11*

onyx folio
#

ah I see it now

#

thanks

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @onyx folio

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

coral junco
#

This is the proof of the binominial coefficient (the thing on the very top left), there is this part of the proof which I didn't understand, I copied it off my professor's lesson, can someone explain it to me?

coral junco
#

It's a proof by induction

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@coral junco Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@coral junco Has your question been resolved?

coral junco
#

Oh well I'm gonna close it, only my professor knows

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @coral junco

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid crow
#

I originally psoted to this to stack overflow

timid crow
#

But no one could help

#

any help would be greatly appreciated 🙂

#

it deals with even values of riemann zeta

#

and an infinite expansion of cot(x)

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid crow Has your question been resolved?

timid crow
#

<@&286206848099549185>

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid crow Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid crow Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid crow Has your question been resolved?

timid crow
#

@timid silo the problem is that I’m not sure what type of math this is

#

Since this is beyond my own level

#

Alright, I’ll try

#

@timid silo thanks!

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @timid crow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

upbeat silo
#

I keep getting the wrong answer.

#

And I don't know what i am doing wrong.

worn swan
#

find the circumference

#

when you do, finding radius shouldnt be hard

upbeat silo
#

I did all of that and i get 3/32 for the radius

worn swan
#

is radius 6?

upbeat silo
#

ye

worn swan
#

360deg : 45 deg = x : 3/2 pi

#

solve for x

#

x=2r pi

upbeat silo
#

OHHH

#

SHOOT

#

IM SO DUM

#

I DID

#

45/360 = 8

#

LMAO

#

im an idiot

#

Tyyy

worn swan
#

np

timid silo
#

Hi what are these problems called? Radicals ? or what

upbeat silo
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @upbeat silo

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

undone mountain
#

Hello

obtuse pebbleBOT
undone mountain
#

This is a question on superposition of two waves

#

Ive managed to work out the amplitude which is 5mm

#

but i have no clue where to start with the frequencies

#

<@&286206848099549185>

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@undone mountain Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@undone mountain Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

boreal cipher
#

!help

obtuse pebbleBOT
boreal cipher
#

I don't know how to solve this question. Could someone please solve it with working?

warm canopy
#

replace x with -2

boreal cipher
#

-2f = 5x³

#

is it basically

#

-2.5x³ x (-2)

warm canopy
#

f(x) is not f times x

#

its a function f, evaluated at a number x

#

you're looking for f(-2)

#

replace all x with -2

boreal cipher
#

Ok for one second I thought i was smart

#

now i just feel dumb

#

so

#

F = 5 (-2)³

#

so its -40

#

idk

#

honestly

warm shaleBOT
warm canopy
#

which yes is -40

boreal cipher
#

How did u do that

#

command

warm canopy
boreal cipher
#

$ 4x-9 $

#

i literally dont understand

#

$ $ sdwa $ $

warm canopy
#

if you're done with this channel then please close it

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@boreal cipher Has your question been resolved?

warm canopy
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @warm canopy

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

weary delta
#

Any ideas?

obtuse pebbleBOT
weary delta
#

I figure that b_n is of the same order as 1/n^3, but I can’t seem to do much more

#

$\lim_{n \to +\infty} a_n = 0$ is I guess another thing that can be gathered from here

warm shaleBOT
#

Learath2

gilded needle
#

try to use that to bound |a_n b_n| by something that is absolutely summable

weary delta
gilded needle
#

any convergent sequence is bounded

#

the tail is bounded by, say L-epsilon and L+epsilon where L is the limit

#

and there are only finitely many elements not in the tail

weary delta
#

Okay, so in that case |a_n b_n| <= |\eps b_n| <= \eps |b_n| and since b_n ~ 1/n^3 this absolutely converges?

gilded needle
#

yeah, assuming eps is a bound for |a_n|

#

you might want to make the b_n bound a bit more explicit

#

but the reasoning is right

timid silo
#

so its about determining whether the b_n series converges?

#

|b_n| series

weary delta
#

Well we know as $n \to +\infty$ $a_n \to 0$, thus as you said $|a_n| \leq \epsilon$ maybe even $\forall \epsilon > 0$ ?

gilded needle
warm shaleBOT
#

Learath2

weary delta
#

Actually doesn't the e-d definition of limit guarantee that there exists an N > 0 forall epsilon s.t. n > N implies our bound works?

timid silo
#

well, is it perhaps possible to get an upperbound for |b_n| as K/n²?

weary delta
#

I think the 2nd given is enough to say that b_n is asymptotically of the same order as 1/n^3, so if |a_n b_n| is <= \epsilon |b_n| then the the convergence of this \epsilon |b_n| series is enough to show that the smaller |a_n b_n| also has to converge

gilded needle
weary delta
#

if b_n is asymptotically the same order as 1/n^3 then |b_n| converges by the asymptotic comparison test

#

then \epsilon |b_n| converges, then |a_n b_n| converges, then our initial series absolutely converges

gilded needle
#

it's not hard to convert from the ~ to an appropriate <=

weary delta
gilded needle
weary delta
#

Well, hm. $b_n \sim 1/n^3 \implies |b_n| \sim |1/n^3|$, no? and since as $n \to +\infty |1/n^3| = 1/n^3$ giving us $|b_n| \sim |1/n^3| = 1/n^3$

#

This is about what I was thinking

warm shaleBOT
#

Learath2

timid silo
#

|b_n|*n² goes to 0 right? so we can make |b_n|*n² arbitrarily small, therefore lets make it less then 1, so there is an N so that |b_n|*n²<1 for n≥N and therefore |b_n|<1/n². And then chose some K, so that |b_n|<K/n² for all n<N

#

maybe K=N²*sup{|b_n|: n<N}

weary delta
timid silo
#

so you say that generally if the |a_n| series is convergent and |a_n| ~ |b_n|, then the |b_n| series is convergent too?

weary delta
#

Generally if a_n ~ b_n, if series a_n is convergent, so is series b_n. Don't need the absolute value

#

That's just the limit comparison theorem as other countries seem to call it

#

I guess the only question there is if you can abs both sides of an equivalence relation like that

timid silo
#

ohh i see

weary delta
#

$f \sim g \implies \lim_{n \to +\infty} f/g = 1 \implies |\lim_{n \to +\infty} f/g| = |1| \implies \lim_{n \to +\infty} |f/g| = 1 \implies \lim_{n \to +\infty} |f|/|g| = 1 \implies |f| \sim |g|$

warm shaleBOT
#

Learath2

weary delta
#

I think it does

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@weary delta Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@weary delta Has your question been resolved?

wild swallow
#

what's the problem here?

weary delta
#

I started with the fact that $\lim_{n \to +\infty} a_n = 0$. Thus through the e-d definition of the limit I conclude that $\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists N > 0 : n > N \implies |a_n| < \epsilon$ thus $|a_n| < \epsilon_0$

warm shaleBOT
#

Learath2

weary delta
#

Then for the series at hand I decide to check for absolute convergence of the series $|(-1)^n a_n b_n| = |a_n b_n| <= |\epsilon_0 b_n|$

warm shaleBOT
#

Learath2

weary delta
#

Also given is $b_n \sim \frac{1}{n^3} \implies |b_n| \sim \frac{1}{n^3}$

warm shaleBOT
#

Learath2

weary delta
#

Thus I conclude $\epsilon_0 |b_n| \sim \frac{1}{n^3}$ which converges, thus our original series absolutely converges

warm shaleBOT
#

Learath2

wild swallow
#

so you're done

weary delta
#

Is my reasoning correct?

wild swallow
#

it is

wild swallow
weary delta
#

Do constant factors really matter in this asymptotic notation?

wild swallow
#

well if you don't want them to then you gotta write O(n^-3)

weary delta
warm shaleBOT
#

Learath2

wild swallow
#

yes

weary delta
warm shaleBOT
#

Learath2

wild swallow
#

yes

weary delta
# wild swallow yes

One last question, do you happen to know if the limit comparison test applies to functions big-O of eachother aswell?

wild swallow
#

thats the same as asymptotically equivalent but with a constant

#

constants don't spoil convergence

weary delta
#

So I could aswell have said b_n = O(n^{-3})

wild swallow
#

yes

weary delta
#

Thank you

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @weary delta

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hallow grotto
#

hello i was wondering whether someone would be able to help me with smoothing functions like this

hallow grotto
#

or direct me to a resource i can use to learn more about them

#

i think this is a gaussian smoothing function but i cant find much helpful info on it

#

W is the smoothing function and h is the smoothing length

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@hallow grotto Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

spark plume
#

hey guys, im not sure if im in the right place. and sort of a bit nervous to ask the questions as i have been out of school a long time and i have returned to school now but ive forgotten a lot of what i knew, so im trying to catch up using khan academy, and ive come across something im not really sure about, and thats finding the least common denominator. So they explain it pretty well, but they are mentioning i should use "multiples of" said number. Now wouldnt that mean for example 6 x 6 x 6 instead of 6x2 6x3 6x4 increments? sorry for the simplistic nature of my level of math and no this isnt a troll im genuinely interested in the answer here

warm canopy
#

Youre thinking of powers

#

6³=6x6x6

#

But 3*6= 6+6+6

spark plume
#

ahhhh ok, so when searching to match the common denominators do i just simply scale using the smallest one and go up till the least shared number is found?

warm canopy
#

Well you may have to scale both if one isn't a multiple of the other

#

You write out a list of multiples of both until you find the first number in both your lists

#

That's your lowest common denominator

spark plume
#

ahhh that makes total sense. awesome thank you. i was sort of looking at the video with the head tilt trying to figure out the meaning of what they were saying. Thank you for the solution 🙂 much appreciated

hallow grotto
#

pls help

#

.reopen

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@spark plume Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @spark plume

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

normal gate
obtuse pebbleBOT
normal gate
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @normal gate

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

tidal hawk
#

yes?

#

oh nvm HAHA the timing

normal gate
#

sry lol

tidal hawk
#

issokii

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

novel bane
#

Percentage formula.
I have this variable, whos value increases by 1 each second.
Id like the percentage to be 0.8 when the variable is at 1 and 0 when the variable reaches 3600 ( 1 hour).
Now is there a way to write this without using floating points?
Like instead of (x1.85)/100
~ (x
185)/10000.
Im rly bad at math, so pls go easy on me with the explanations. smolsadcatconcern

shut marlin
#

We usually use orders of magnitude to represent small decimal numbers:
10000% is 100, that is 10^2
1000% is 10, that is 10^1
100% is 1, that is 10^0
10% is 0.1, that is 10^(-1).

Things like 0.2%, which is equal to 0.002, would be represented as 2*(10^(-3)).

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@novel bane Has your question been resolved?

novel bane
#

Hmm how would u write a formula for my problem tho?
If i want a 80% when the value is at 1 and 0% when at 3600?

#

We usually use orders of magnitude to represent small decimal numbers:
10000% is 100, that is 10^2
1000% is 10, that is 10^1
100% is 1, that is 10^0
10% is 0.1, that is 10^(-1).

Things like 0.2%, which is equal to 0.002, would be represented as 2*(10^(-3)).
@shut marlin
I will look this up ty

shut marlin
#

*Decreases

#

Do you go from 80% to 79%, or from 80% to 79.5%, or maybe 80% to 79.9%?

novel bane
#

Hmm im trying to write this in code for a program that doesent accept floats

#

Whats the cheapest way?

shut marlin
#

Depending on how percise you want your code to be

#

The cheapest way is 80% at 1, and then directly drop to 0% at 1800

novel bane
#

80-79?

shut marlin
novel bane
#

God i didnt even know abt this decrease 🤣

#

Yeah but then i could just use an if statement

shut marlin
#

Consider this case, and then generalize it to three, four, five

novel bane
#

I was wondering if a formula could do the work for me instead of just writing a ton of ifs

shut marlin
#

Eventually you'll get how to map 80%, 79%, 78%… on to 1, 2, 3…

novel bane
#

Idk much about compilers, im kinda self taught. So what ur saying is that using a formula would cost more energy than just 3 ifs?

#

Omg i dont understand

shut marlin
#

Kinda, I don't actually know what you're talking about when you say formula, I'm a CS student and I'll use a loop

novel bane
#

Have u heared about unix timestamp?

shut marlin
#

Yes

novel bane
#

I got 2 variables of them

#

To work with

#

So a prvious one and the current

#

So the current - the previous

#

Gives me a certain time

#

From that time i wanted to calculate a %

#

Based on how much had passed

brave matrix
#

Catching up on the conversation. You're saying you want the percentage to decrement by (1/3600) every second?

novel bane
#

Or well every time i call the function to calculate the percentage. The unix time will pass anyways. @brave matrix

brave matrix
#

So 3/3600ths if 3 seconds have passed, etc, right?

novel bane
#

Yes

brave matrix
#

How precise are you wanting it?

novel bane
#

I legit dont know, i didnt even know i had to factor that in. I thought there was a magic formula that calculated it perfectly. (80-79.999) but thats linear i guess and as i just learned that would cost more computing power? Which i kinda need to save a bit

#

80-70-60? How would that go?

brave matrix
#

Yeah, I mean you could just multiply by 10 (or 1000 or 1000000), then divide by that and round to int if you wanted

#

Just throwing out an easy solution, maybe not a perfect one :p

novel bane
#

How many digits can a int hold?

brave matrix
#

I'm a software developer and not a mathematician lol

#

32 bits

#

so about 2.something billion

novel bane
#

Oh ok thats enough kek

brave matrix
#

the value is 2.something billion, not digits

#

if you use uint, you'd have double that, up to 4ish billion, but you can't have negatives with uint, if that at all interests you :p

novel bane
#

Thx for the tip 2D_O2Heart

brave matrix
#

Sure thing!

novel bane
#

Hmm u by any chance familiar with solidity?

brave matrix
#

Just had to look it up, that's the first I've heard of it. Looks very similar to Typescript, though

novel bane
#

Yeah rather typescript than js, its compiler is super strict

brave matrix
#
function calcPercentage(int elapsedTime){
    return round(8000 + (elapsedTime * (100/36))/10000);
}
#

something along those lines was what I was thinking

novel bane
#

If i already have 2 software eng's in here could u take a look at this and mb explain me a bit of whats happening here.

#

the << syntax is supposedly moving bits to the left?

brave matrix
#

any section in particular?

#

yep, that's a bit shift operator

novel bane
#

both encode functions

#

whats their purpose and whats like the purpose behind shifting bits?

#

i dont expect a whole course but if u could give me some points to go on about id appreciate it a lot. Im kinda learning by myself anyways but id like to know what to search or what this topic is exactly

brave matrix
#

I'm no expert on it, since I don't really ever use it in my work, but bit shifting can be very processor efficient if you have something that can be solved with 2^n, such as calculating Fibonacci sequences, etc.

#

I'm sort of taking a guess here, seems pretty specific to solidity, but if I had to take a guess without researching much, it looks like the first encode function is taking a uint112 (112 bit number? seems too big) and forcing it into a uint224 (twice as big I'd assume) then shifting it 112 times

novel bane
#

& all that for efficency purposes is ur guess

#

god

brave matrix
#

Yep, bit shifting would be more efficient then doing the squaring to get to that number

novel bane
#

damn thx a lot! I kinda understand the purpose of that code finally.

brave matrix
#

🥳

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@novel bane Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @novel bane

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ruby skiff
#

how did n-11 get divided out?

royal basin
#

they applied the rational root theorem and found that 11 was a root therefore they did the long division behind the scenes

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@ruby skiff Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lone blade
#

find the orthogonal projection of the given vector on the given subspace W of the inner product space V .

lone blade
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@lone blade Has your question been resolved?

charred plume
#

I would start by finding an orthonormal basis for P_1(R). You know how to do that?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@lone blade Has your question been resolved?

charred plume
#

I think sqrt 12 should be 2/sqrt(3), but otherwise looks good.

#

(but I didn't write it down carefully so I could be wrong on the constant too...)

#

Hah, yeah I didn't do it carefully. Sqrt(12) it is.

#

Then take inner product of h(x) with each of those. Call the numbers you get A and B... Then the orthogonal projection is A + B sqrt(12)(x-1/2).

lone blade
#

isnt the projection the inner product (h,v) times v

lone blade
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lone blade

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dreamy current
#

would i use a double angle formula or compound angle formula to simplify this expression?

next sluice
dreamy current
#

i just realised

warm shaleBOT
#

Alex88

dreamy current
#

thanks

#

im bad at noticing frations like these

#

i was tryna figure out what angles would work lol

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dreamy current

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

next sluice
dreamy current
#

yeah but i was working in radians

#

i know how to do it in degrees but i was tryna force myself to use radians

#

so id be more accommodated with them

next sluice
#

ahhh fair enough

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

$\ker S = {0} \implies \ker(T \circ S) = {0}$

warm shaleBOT
#

metnal

timid silo
#

let $S,T:V \to V$ be linear operators

warm shaleBOT
#

metnal

timid silo
#

im not sure how to find the proper vector spaces and the proper linear transformations

kind hawk
#

what happens when you try to prove it. where does it go wrong?

#

try to understand that. then it's easy to construct a counterexample

timid silo
#

\begin{gather*}
S(\vec{v}) = \vec0 \implies \vec{v} = \vec0\
T(S(\vec{u})) = \vec0\
S(\vec{u}) = \vec0 \implies T(S(\vec{u})) = \vec0\
S(\vec{u}) \neq \vec0 \not\implies T(S(\vec{u})) \neq \vec0
\end{gather*}

#

this is what i arrived at

#

but im not even sure how to form a linear transformation

kind hawk
#

that last step is wrong

#

but why

timid silo
#

uh

kind hawk
#

you are using a property of T there

#

which it doesn't always have

timid silo
#

oh wait

#

its supposed to be \centernot

#

like

#

"not implies"

#

the bot didnt render it correctly

#

lemme fix it

kind hawk
#

ah ok

#

then that is correct. but why is it "not implies"

warm shaleBOT
#

metnal

timid silo
#

cuz u could be another vector and S(u) would be a nonzero vector and T could still output a zero vector for that

#

the kernel of T isnt limited to the 0 vector

kind hawk
#

yes

#

it's about the kernel of T

#

what's the easiest linear transformation with a non-trivial kernel

timid silo
#

i have no idea lol

kind hawk
#

what's the easiest linear transformation in general

timid silo
#

uhm

#

i dunno maybe something that just scales the vectors by a constant?

kind hawk
#

which is the easiest constant

timid silo
#

uh that would be 0 or 1 but im not sure these are useful here?

#

so maybe 2? idk

kind hawk
#

0

#

the easiest map is the zero map

timid silo
#

yes but doesnt it just shrink everything to 0

kind hawk
#

yes

#

that's the point

#

what happens if T=0 is the zero map

timid silo
#

ohhhhhhhhhh

#

so T(whatever) is gonna be 0

kind hawk
#

yes

timid silo
#

so the kernel of T is infinite?

#

i mean it contains infinite amount of vectors

kind hawk
#

well depends on which vector space

#

some vector spaces are finite

#

the point is that it's not trivial

timid silo
#

but it contains all the vectors in the vector space im guessing?

kind hawk
#

yes

timid silo
#

makes perfect sense

kind hawk
#

so for every x we have that T(S(x))=0

timid silo
#

yup

#

tysm

#

haveaa good day

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @rich nimbus

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

unkempt jewel
obtuse pebbleBOT
unkempt jewel
#

ABCD is a quadrilateral, EF makes a 90 degree angle with KF

#

it also says E, F, K, L is midpoints

#

the video solving this said to draw a line from E to K and that line would be equal to x

#

i dont understand how it is equal to x

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@unkempt jewel Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

signal trail
#

Find the equation of a circle having a tangent line of y=3-5x which passes through the point (2,-7) and the center of a circle is contained on the line x=2y+19

signal trail
#

Good day, is there anyone who can help me with this problem? Anyone available

#

<@&286206848099549185>

rain mountain
#

Am i right?

#

so that vertical line to the tangent line we found has an equation for itself
its gonna be y = -x/5 + c , cause the slop of tangent line is 5
the vertical slope of the radius line will be -1/5

#

after finding c by putting the given point (2,-7) in the new equation.

#

the equation of radius line will have an intersection with the line of center of circle

#

so that we find the x,y of the circle

gloomy valve
#

Another way (without visual geometry) would be to write down the general equation for a circle centered at (x0, y0) and radius r:
(x - x0)^2 + (y - y0)^2 = r^2

Let y = y(x) and differentiate both sides with respect to x, that gives you tangent slope at every point of the circle. Plug in the given point (2, -7) with the condition that dy/dx = -5 and eliminate x0 by using x0 = 2y0 + 19. Then you can solve for (x0, y0), plug that back into the circle equation and solve for the radius r.

#

If you don't know calculus, go with XpertTiger's method

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@signal trail Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

Thos was the working out done by my teacher. I'm not sure why they did divided it by 11.

What I would've done is 10% of 348.85 But I get the wrong answer

royal basin
#

the tax is 10% of the pre-tax total, not 10% of the post-tax total

timid silo
#

oh, so whwre did they get 11 from

royal basin
#

110% of pre-tax total = 348.85

desert sinew
#

The keyword is “including”

So let $$x$ be total amount.
We actually have $x + 0.1x = 348.85$, so $x = \dfrac{348.85}{1.1}$

Since we want the charged amount, we need to further multiply this quantity by 0.1 to get the final answer 🙂

warm shaleBOT
#

jimmy1234

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

agile robin
#

Can someone explain how he went from indefinite integral cotx dx to ln sin x

agile robin
#

Got cut off buts it’s +c at the end

fierce lagoon
agile robin
#

Ah I see how would I know I’d have to do the setting up u again?

fierce lagoon
#

You could

#

I mean it's one of the antiderivative identities

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@agile robin Has your question been resolved?

agile robin
#

Ok

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @agile robin

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dull crypt
obtuse pebbleBOT
dull crypt
#

how would I go about solving this?

#

i've worked the range out to be -4k ≤ y

#

oh also

#

$f(x) = k(x^2 + 4x)$

warm shaleBOT
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@dull crypt Has your question been resolved?

dull crypt
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

(sorry)

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@dull crypt Has your question been resolved?

dull crypt
#

<@&286206848099549185> pls ;(

elfin cipher
#

like

#

$f(1) = k(1^2 + 4*1)$

warm shaleBOT
dull crypt
#

ahh thank you

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dull crypt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

frail lake
#

hey

obtuse pebbleBOT
frail lake
#

<@&286206848099549185>

worldly fog
#

!15m

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.

frail lake
#

ok but you avalaiable?

worldly fog
#

Well you didn't even ask a question

frail lake
#

well I wanted to start a conversation

#

but ok

#

here it it

#

I just dont know how to start

#

special right triangle

#

thats my teachers answers

versed cave
#

do you understand why (x)° is 45°?

nocturne minnow
worldly fog
#

Do you know the 90/45/45 triangle

frail lake
#

dam i just wanted to be friendly

#

yes how is it 45?

worldly fog
#

Because a square will have all 90 degree angles, correct?

#

And 90/2 is 45

#

So x is 45 degrees

high lily
#

pinging helpers before 15minutes and before asking a proper math question implying that you didn't read the rules or the auto generated message directly above may be considered hostile (quite the opposite of friendly)

frail lake
#

but it should all equal 180 yes? so it could be 30 and 60?

#

oh wait

#

no

#

dont say anything i get it

#

lol

nocturne minnow
#

Or because it's an isosceles triangle, you already know that one of the angles is 90, so you have two other angles that are equal to each other

frail lake
#

is me saying hey being unfriendly?

high lily
#

saying hey is friendly,
pinging helpers like that is not

frail lake
#

like dam guys i didnt mean to make yall upset

worldly fog
frail lake
#

sorry I just needed help and I got it thanks

#

ok other question

#

if you jsut have that one leg

#

how would you tell if its supposed to be a 30 60?

nocturne minnow
#

Starting a conversation is better suited in #discussion or #serious-discussion
Getting help typically means posting your question first, what you tried and following the rules, like what that auto generated message states

high lily
#

it really depends on what info you're given and have to work with

#

if you're just given one leg of a triangle and literally nothing else, there isn't much to say about that triangle

frail lake
#

lets say this one

worldly fog
#

But because we know it's a square and we know the sides are congruent there is multiple ways to prove it's 45 degrees for both

frail lake
#

wait back up

#

sorry guys

#

another question on other problem

high lily
#

same principle as the previous question

worldly fog
#

Well, y will be 45 degrees which makes the other 45 degrees as well

frail lake
#

so is there another way to show that x is 45?

worldly fog
#

So x is 17sqrt(2)

high lily
#

So x is 17sqrt(2)
no

worldly fog
#

Sorry, other way around, 17/sqrt(2)

frail lake
#

instaed of saying 90/2

#

is there another way of showing x is 45

worldly fog
#

Yes, as dldh06 said, isosceles triangle

frail lake
#

oh

#

yea

#

equals 180

high lily
#

90/2 is applied in one way or another

frail lake
#

but 30 and 60 equals 180 too

nocturne minnow
#

It's because it's an isosceles triangle

worldly fog
#

Well we know that the other two angles have to be the same

#

30 does not equal 60

nocturne minnow
#

Isosceles means that two sides are the same length

nocturne minnow
frail lake
#

ok im all good now thanks and sorry for upseting you guys

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @frail lake

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

royal rover
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@royal rover Has your question been resolved?

royal rover
#

<@&286206848099549185> I do not know where to get started, I know the ending point and im pretty sure I am supposed to use SVD

royal rover
#

would differentiating this equation give x + lambda^T A?

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

would this be correct?

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @royal rover

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

jaunty dew
#

How can I find the coordinates for the point of contact, I have a line: y = mx and a curve: y= x^2+6x-4, the value of m is 2 or 10; how would I find the coordinates of the point of contact? Can someone please explain this to me, thanks.

celest kettle
#

point of contact

#

will be the solution of a simultaneous equation

#

ok here's an example

jaunty dew
jaunty dew
celest kettle
solar trellis
jaunty dew
celest kettle
#

consider the point they intersect

jaunty dew
jaunty dew
celest kettle
#

cool

jaunty dew
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @jaunty dew

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

celest kettle
#

glad I helped

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sonic herald
#

@celest kettle

obtuse pebbleBOT
sonic herald
#

i got a question

celest kettle
#

ok

sonic herald
#

i don't really understand what they're asking here

#

Find the measures of a complementary angle, a supplementary angle, and a vertical angle for an angle with the given measure: 47 degrees

#

@celest kettle

celest kettle
#

complementary is 43

#

supp is 133

sonic herald
#

wait so

#

their asking the measures of the 2nd angle

celest kettle
#

vertical...

sonic herald
#

i couldn't really understand what they were trying to ask

#

bc they just said find the measures of a complementary angle

#

like did they mean the angle that's not 47 degrees

celest kettle
#

if a is the complementary angle of b, a+b=90°

sonic herald
#

yea ik

#

but i didn't understand what they were trying to ask

#

ty

celest kettle
#

me neither natural language is hard

sonic herald
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sonic herald

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

celest kettle
#

but I'm trying my best ig

sonic herald
celest kettle
#

aka english

sonic herald
#

o

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

grave flicker
obtuse pebbleBOT
grave flicker
#

So i know that if I plugged in 0 for x that the limits on some of these functions would not exist

#

but if i multiplied

#

0 by 0

#

it would return 0

timid silo
#

ok lets start with the first one, does the limit of floor(6x) exist?

grave flicker
#

It does exist

#

wait is it floor or abs value

#

?

timid silo
#

its floor

grave flicker
#

idek what floor is

#

wait what

#

We were never taught that

#

Could you try to explain what floor is?

timid silo
#

floor basically just rounds down your number,
floor(x) returns the maximum integer z with z≤x
floor(6.3) = 6
floor(4.9) = 4
floor(5) = 5
floor(-1) = -1
floor(-2.5) = -3

grave flicker
#

oh ok so here floor 6 = 6 got it

#

just like in programming

#

so back to your original question

timid silo
#

but now you got floor(6x)

#

what is the right side limit?

grave flicker
#

i would say floor 6x does not havea limit

#

DNE

timid silo
#

hmm, why would it be infinite?

grave flicker
#

wait

#

because

#

6 * x would

#

always produce an output

timid silo
#

we go x -> 0+

grave flicker
#

so as x approaches 0 from the right side?

timid silo
#

yeah

#

like floor(0.1), floor(0.01), floor(0.001)

grave flicker
#

so the limit

#

for that fn dosent exist right?

#

and same for g(x) on the first one

#

?

timid silo
#

the right side limit does exist

grave flicker
#

O_O

timid silo
#

what is floor(0.1)?