#help-10
1 messages · Page 24 of 1
<@&286206848099549185>
from the left use -(1+x) and from the right (1+x)
well either way it will diverge (if i can see it correctly)
Wdym by diverge
Also wouldn’t it just be undefined limit ?
I’m getting undefined?
Yeah ?
yes divergent means that it doesnt exist (or goes to infinity)
Wait I’m getting positive infinity?
.close
Closed by @devout tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I put the question on the left, I don't understand what Im doing wrong
I divided every term by x^2 because its the highest power
6 and 6/x² are not the same thing
No you didn't
For the second fraction, you divided the top and bottom by x²
That's the same as dividing by 1
Besides, there's no need to divide at all
What's the lim x -> ∞ of 6?
6?
i thought I had to divide. that's how i was taught l'hopital rule and i thought i had to do that here
L'h only applies in indeterminate forms
0/0, ∞/∞, etc
You don't have that
Besides, you wouldn't just be dividing by something. You'd divide the top and bottom by something, which doesn't change the fraction
Now, what's lim x->∞ 2/x²?
thats weird in my notes we used l'hopitals rule but the problems dont look like theyre indeterminate
thatd be 0
so the answer would be 6 cause 6+0
the problem that we started practicing lh with is x/(x^2+5)
as x is apporaching infinity
is that indeterminate
That's ∞/∞
howd you get that
The numerator goes to ∞ and the denominator goes to ∞
You technically can't directly substitute infinity, but it's the same idea
ok so when i approach limit problems with infinity, i should try to "substitute" the infinity for x, and only use lh if its indeterminate, right?
Yes
L'h gives wrong answers otherwise, since it only applies to indeterminate forms
It also only applies to single fractions. So if you had two fractions added together, you'd have to either combine them, or apply l'h twice
so like the problem that i was trying to solve from the picture, that would be like two fractions?
Yep
You can't apply l'h to either, since neither are indeterminate
Also, and this is just my opinion, but I personally think you shouldn't resort to l'h unless you can't do it any other way. It gives the same answer, but I don't like l'h being used as a sort of crutch
if there was an x in the numerator and denominator then thatd be indeterminate right
Yeah, but then you could just cancel them. Depends on how the x's are placed, I suppose
what other ways are there? ive just tried lh cause thats what we did last time in class so i thought it applied
Depends on the situation
For rational functions, there's factoring, for instance
If you're going to infinity, you can divide the numerator and denominator by the highest power
If there's square roots, there's some possibility for simplification there
There's lots of different things
isnt that only lh rule?
That's not l'h
L'h is when you take the derivative of the numerator and denominator
If you don't know what a derivative is, then you definitely were not taught l'h
this is overwhelming
i dont know ill try to figure it out
thanks for the help though
The method you believed was l'h works for all rational functions when x-> ± ∞ btw
Not just indeterminate
like the thing where i can cross out 6/x^2 and make it 0?
That's more just a general rule than anything
It's more like if you have (2x² + x)/(x² + 1), you could divide the top and bottom by x²
does it have to be indeterminate?
No
so indeterminate only matters for lh rule?
I hope so
its just overwhelming for me cause we were taught it was lhopital and it really isnt so now i dont even know what i know
Yeah idk what your teacher is thinking
ive tried watching some videos online about lh and i dont understand it but ill try to spend some more time watching and see if i can understand
Lh requires knowledge of derivatives first
So you probably won't be able to understand it now
Closed by @strange yoke
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does anyone know how to approach this problem? i know it has something to do with optimization but im not sure how to work through it
the answer is 300 euros and 220 passengers
@rapid kindle Has your question been resolved?
@rapid kindle Has your question been resolved?
Let's let the number of price decreases be x
Then, the price is 500-10x
And the tickets sold is 180+2x
So the revenue is (500-10x)(180+2x)
You can expand and complete the square, and you should get this
,w maximize (500-10x)(180+2x)
🤔
Hold on
The answer is wrong lol
300 Euros and 220 passengers means 66000
But 500 eurosand 180 passengers means 90000
international baccalaureate math moment
¯_(ツ)_/¯
i graphed the (500+10x)(180-2x) and got (20, 98000) as the maximum as well
🤷
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
so lets say I bought a lightbulb and it will stop working on the 12500th day
what day of the week is 12500th day on?
how can I figure that out?
check remainder when divided by 7
find the remainder
oh
k
5
is the remainder
so its friday?
so how does it work
how does finding the remainder give us the answer
consider the number of days in a week
oh
so its friday?
depends on what day you start on
monday
@opal wagon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @opal wagon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
m=1
4=3(1)+b
1=b
y=x+1
y=-x
-x=x+1
-2x=1
x=-1/2
y=1/2
(1/2,-1/2)(3,4)
thats what i got
i got it wron
g
idk how to do fraction distances
could someone help
I would just find the perpendicular line that crosses through (3,4).
This line and y = -x will intersect at (a,b); you can use distance formula there on
Which is what you seem to have done but uh
You need to use distance formula
@barren junco Has your question been resolved?
yea i did
but i got 26.5
are the points correct?
Points are correct
You did distance formula incorrectly though
It's definitely not 26.5
There are no units
3.5 and 3.5
No
its asking for a unit answer
Well distance formula
What is $\sqrt{3.5^2 + 3.5^2}$
Umbraleviathan
But also like
24.5 but i already tried that
h o w
Wdym how is 4-(1/2) = 2.5 lol
thats the equivalent to 4-(.5)
ive been stuck on this for like 2 days id ont know how to do it if theres fractions involved
I saw the 1.2 and thought of 1.2 but mistaken the 2 is 1/2
Also no
Recall that $\sqrt{a^2 + a^2} = a\sqrt{2}$
what the fuck
Umbraleviathan
ion got one
how do i turn 3.5^2+3.5^2 into a square root
sqrt
oh fuck
sqrt(3.5^2 + 3.5^2)
You never took the square root
It happens
i was thinkin it was there for deco lmfao
people make mistakes ig
alr thats my problem why i was stuck on it for so long
ty
Np
.close
Closed by @barren junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@gritty onyx Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @gritty onyx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im working on another integral hw. how would i go about integrating this?
Use u sub
No
?
we havent
Ah
Alright
So listen
Whenever you have a linear function inside of another function, you need to integrate the major function and divide by the derivative of the linear function. That will give you the integral for the whole thing
In this case, sin 2t is the major function and 2t is the linear function
ohhhh
So what would the integral be?
-cos(2t)/2
Yup
Now you can evaluate the limits
And remember, this ONLY works for linear functions
-cos(pi)/2 + 1/2
Uh
yep i got it
$(-\frac{\cos \pi}{2}) - (-\frac{\cos 0}{2})$
Sorry for the slow LaTeX I'm not at my PC
Yep my bad
then i did leave change change for the signs
NEONPerseus
Yup
1/2 + 1/2 = 1
Good going
no u
i didnt use simplified form originally
the system still accepted it
LOL
but its always a good idea to simplify
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @thin pivot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I would really appreciate some guidance on some questions about generalizing the convergence or divergence in the iteration of linear functions
@bleak eagle Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @bleak eagle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why this don't have some function infront of the $rdrd\theta$
phngs
Not sure I understand the question
You don’t need anything in front of rdrdtheta
You’re calculating area as well
Opposed to volume
then how do you explain this
You can very easily write that as a triple integral
isn't this double integral
And then there would just be rdrdtheta again
sorry but i dont understand well yet
You can write anything you want in the function you're trying to integrate
@void narwhal Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @void narwhal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Try multiplying by the conjugate. So multiply by (7+sqrt10)/(7+sqrt10)
ok ill try that
wait im confused.
I dont think it should work like this. Would you explain further so that i can understand more?
im not good in math, maybe you could explain it in a way that a kid would understand
So you know how (x-1)*(x+1) = (x^2) - 1 if you foil it out?
yepp
It’s the same idea. You had the right idea in the pic you sent, except you did minus instead of plus
oh
im still confused about why and how should i do that though.
would you explain more to me?
So the question asks you to rationalize the denominator, which means you want to make sure that no square root signs appear in the denominator
are we trying to cancel out the 7-(sqrt10) ?
It’s okay if there is square roots in the numerator, but not the denominator
oh, so thats what rationalize means
Yes exactly
Yep that’s right
oh i see now
but how do i know when i should use the "(x-1)*(x+1) = (x^2) - 1" method you taught me?
It depends on how high of a level you get into mathematics, but at this level, anytime you see the words “rationalize the denominator”, that should be the first thing you try
thank you so much, i understand now : )
Would you mind me asking a new question?
It says i need to solve it by completing the square, but the answer shows a quadratic formula used. What should i do?
Yep agreed
Closed by @trim jay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do we know what GCD means
.close
Closed by @violet prism
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
well, how will you prove Q* isn't cyclic?
if you can prove that then you will have your nonisomorphism
...wait hold on
you confused me on the notation a little
is Q* meant to be Q \ {0}?
then (Q*, +) isn't a group at all!
do you have the problem exactly as written
to ensure this is a fuckup on the teacher's part and not on yours
post it here
okay yeah
the correct answer is "(Q*, +) is not a group at all"
Closed by @white basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for the part in the general term, I don't understand how 11 was distributed to (n-1) and the final when simplified became 11n-5
bc d=11
you substitute that and get 6+11(n-1)
using distributive property
you multiply 11 by both n and -1
and get 6*+11n-11*
Closed by @onyx folio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is the proof of the binominial coefficient (the thing on the very top left), there is this part of the proof which I didn't understand, I copied it off my professor's lesson, can someone explain it to me?
It's a proof by induction
@coral junco Has your question been resolved?
@coral junco Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @coral junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I originally psoted to this to stack overflow
But no one could help
any help would be greatly appreciated 🙂
it deals with even values of riemann zeta
and an infinite expansion of cot(x)
@timid crow Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@timid crow Has your question been resolved?
@timid crow Has your question been resolved?
@timid crow Has your question been resolved?
@timid silo the problem is that I’m not sure what type of math this is
Since this is beyond my own level
Alright, I’ll try
@timid silo thanks!
.close
Closed by @timid crow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I did all of that and i get 3/32 for the radius
is radius 6?
ye
np
Hi what are these problems called? Radicals ? or what
.close
Closed by @upbeat silo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
This is a question on superposition of two waves
Ive managed to work out the amplitude which is 5mm
but i have no clue where to start with the frequencies
<@&286206848099549185>
@undone mountain Has your question been resolved?
@undone mountain Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!help
I don't know how to solve this question. Could someone please solve it with working?
replace x with -2
f(x) is not f times x
its a function f, evaluated at a number x
you're looking for f(-2)
replace all x with -2
Ok for one second I thought i was smart
now i just feel dumb
so
F = 5 (-2)³
so its -40
idk
honestly
ΣAC
which yes is -40
@boreal cipher Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @warm canopy
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Any ideas?
I figure that b_n is of the same order as 1/n^3, but I can’t seem to do much more
$\lim_{n \to +\infty} a_n = 0$ is I guess another thing that can be gathered from here
Learath2
and from that, you know that in particular, a_n is a bounded sequence
try to use that to bound |a_n b_n| by something that is absolutely summable
Hm, why is this the case?
any convergent sequence is bounded
the tail is bounded by, say L-epsilon and L+epsilon where L is the limit
and there are only finitely many elements not in the tail
Okay, so in that case |a_n b_n| <= |\eps b_n| <= \eps |b_n| and since b_n ~ 1/n^3 this absolutely converges?
yeah, assuming eps is a bound for |a_n|
you might want to make the b_n bound a bit more explicit
but the reasoning is right
Well we know as $n \to +\infty$ $a_n \to 0$, thus as you said $|a_n| \leq \epsilon$ maybe even $\forall \epsilon > 0$ ?
yes, this argument works as long as the |b_n| series is absolutely convergent
Learath2
Actually doesn't the e-d definition of limit guarantee that there exists an N > 0 forall epsilon s.t. n > N implies our bound works?
well, is it perhaps possible to get an upperbound for |b_n| as K/n²?
I think the 2nd given is enough to say that b_n is asymptotically of the same order as 1/n^3, so if |a_n b_n| is <= \epsilon |b_n| then the the convergence of this \epsilon |b_n| series is enough to show that the smaller |a_n b_n| also has to converge
that should certainly be possible
if b_n is asymptotically the same order as 1/n^3 then |b_n| converges by the asymptotic comparison test
then \epsilon |b_n| converges, then |a_n b_n| converges, then our initial series absolutely converges
do you mean the limit comparison test? if so, i agree but you should first find an explicit bound for |b_n|, right now all you have is |b_n| ~ k/n^3, but you need something of the form |b_n| <= ...
it's not hard to convert from the ~ to an appropriate <=
Why do I need to bound it? LCT already says that if one converges/diverges so does the other
right, but have you formally proved that sum(|b_n|) converges? I mean you're morally right but you should prove it
Well, hm. $b_n \sim 1/n^3 \implies |b_n| \sim |1/n^3|$, no? and since as $n \to +\infty |1/n^3| = 1/n^3$ giving us $|b_n| \sim |1/n^3| = 1/n^3$
This is about what I was thinking
Learath2
|b_n|*n² goes to 0 right? so we can make |b_n|*n² arbitrarily small, therefore lets make it less then 1, so there is an N so that |b_n|*n²<1 for n≥N and therefore |b_n|<1/n². And then chose some K, so that |b_n|<K/n² for all n<N
maybe K=N²*sup{|b_n|: n<N}
Is there something wrong with my line of reasoning?
so you say that generally if the |a_n| series is convergent and |a_n| ~ |b_n|, then the |b_n| series is convergent too?
Generally if a_n ~ b_n, if series a_n is convergent, so is series b_n. Don't need the absolute value
That's just the limit comparison theorem as other countries seem to call it
I guess the only question there is if you can abs both sides of an equivalence relation like that
ohh i see
$f \sim g \implies \lim_{n \to +\infty} f/g = 1 \implies |\lim_{n \to +\infty} f/g| = |1| \implies \lim_{n \to +\infty} |f/g| = 1 \implies \lim_{n \to +\infty} |f|/|g| = 1 \implies |f| \sim |g|$
Learath2
I think it does
@weary delta Has your question been resolved?
@weary delta Has your question been resolved?
what's the problem here?
I'm a bit unsure if what I'm doing is sane
I started with the fact that $\lim_{n \to +\infty} a_n = 0$. Thus through the e-d definition of the limit I conclude that $\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists N > 0 : n > N \implies |a_n| < \epsilon$ thus $|a_n| < \epsilon_0$
Learath2
Then for the series at hand I decide to check for absolute convergence of the series $|(-1)^n a_n b_n| = |a_n b_n| <= |\epsilon_0 b_n|$
Learath2
Also given is $b_n \sim \frac{1}{n^3} \implies |b_n| \sim \frac{1}{n^3}$
Learath2
Thus I conclude $\epsilon_0 |b_n| \sim \frac{1}{n^3}$ which converges, thus our original series absolutely converges
Learath2
so you're done
Is my reasoning correct?
it is
except this should technically be 5/n^3
Do constant factors really matter in this asymptotic notation?
well if you don't want them to then you gotta write O(n^-3)
Hm, so only if the limit is one do we say $f \sim g$?
Learath2
yes
Shouldn't this also be $\frac{5\epsilon_0}{n^3}$? @wild swallow
Learath2
yes
One last question, do you happen to know if the limit comparison test applies to functions big-O of eachother aswell?
thats the same as asymptotically equivalent but with a constant
constants don't spoil convergence
So I could aswell have said b_n = O(n^{-3})
yes
Closed by @weary delta
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello i was wondering whether someone would be able to help me with smoothing functions like this
or direct me to a resource i can use to learn more about them
i think this is a gaussian smoothing function but i cant find much helpful info on it
W is the smoothing function and h is the smoothing length
@hallow grotto Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey guys, im not sure if im in the right place. and sort of a bit nervous to ask the questions as i have been out of school a long time and i have returned to school now but ive forgotten a lot of what i knew, so im trying to catch up using khan academy, and ive come across something im not really sure about, and thats finding the least common denominator. So they explain it pretty well, but they are mentioning i should use "multiples of" said number. Now wouldnt that mean for example 6 x 6 x 6 instead of 6x2 6x3 6x4 increments? sorry for the simplistic nature of my level of math and no this isnt a troll im genuinely interested in the answer here
ahhhh ok, so when searching to match the common denominators do i just simply scale using the smallest one and go up till the least shared number is found?
Well you may have to scale both if one isn't a multiple of the other
You write out a list of multiples of both until you find the first number in both your lists
That's your lowest common denominator
ahhh that makes total sense. awesome thank you. i was sort of looking at the video with the head tilt trying to figure out the meaning of what they were saying. Thank you for the solution 🙂 much appreciated
no
pls help
.reopen
@spark plume Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @spark plume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @normal gate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
sry lol
issokii
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Percentage formula.
I have this variable, whos value increases by 1 each second.
Id like the percentage to be 0.8 when the variable is at 1 and 0 when the variable reaches 3600 ( 1 hour).
Now is there a way to write this without using floating points?
Like instead of (x1.85)/100
~ (x185)/10000.
Im rly bad at math, so pls go easy on me with the explanations. 
We usually use orders of magnitude to represent small decimal numbers:
10000% is 100, that is 10^2
1000% is 10, that is 10^1
100% is 1, that is 10^0
10% is 0.1, that is 10^(-1).
Things like 0.2%, which is equal to 0.002, would be represented as 2*(10^(-3)).
@novel bane Has your question been resolved?
Hmm how would u write a formula for my problem tho?
If i want a 80% when the value is at 1 and 0% when at 3600?
We usually use orders of magnitude to represent small decimal numbers:
10000% is 100, that is 10^2
1000% is 10, that is 10^1
100% is 1, that is 10^0
10% is 0.1, that is 10^(-1).Things like 0.2%, which is equal to 0.002, would be represented as 2*(10^(-3)).
@shut marlin
I will look this up ty
How much increment do you want each time the percentage increases?
*Decreases
Do you go from 80% to 79%, or from 80% to 79.5%, or maybe 80% to 79.9%?
Hmm im trying to write this in code for a program that doesent accept floats
Whats the cheapest way?
Depending on how percise you want your code to be
The cheapest way is 80% at 1, and then directly drop to 0% at 1800
80-79?
In that way you map half of the percentage to half of your values
God i didnt even know abt this decrease 🤣
Yeah but then i could just use an if statement
Consider this case, and then generalize it to three, four, five
I was wondering if a formula could do the work for me instead of just writing a ton of ifs
So in case of 3, you map 80% to a third of your values, some number in the middle to another third, and 0% to the last third
Eventually you'll get how to map 80%, 79%, 78%… on to 1, 2, 3…
Idk much about compilers, im kinda self taught. So what ur saying is that using a formula would cost more energy than just 3 ifs?
Omg i dont understand

Kinda, I don't actually know what you're talking about when you say formula, I'm a CS student and I'll use a loop
Have u heared about unix timestamp?
Yes
I got 2 variables of them
To work with
So a prvious one and the current
So the current - the previous
Gives me a certain time
From that time i wanted to calculate a %
Based on how much had passed
Catching up on the conversation. You're saying you want the percentage to decrement by (1/3600) every second?
Or well every time i call the function to calculate the percentage. The unix time will pass anyways. @brave matrix
So 3/3600ths if 3 seconds have passed, etc, right?
Yes
How precise are you wanting it?
I legit dont know, i didnt even know i had to factor that in. I thought there was a magic formula that calculated it perfectly. (80-79.999) but thats linear i guess and as i just learned that would cost more computing power? Which i kinda need to save a bit
80-70-60? How would that go?
Yeah, I mean you could just multiply by 10 (or 1000 or 1000000), then divide by that and round to int if you wanted
Just throwing out an easy solution, maybe not a perfect one :p
How many digits can a int hold?
I'm a software developer and not a mathematician lol
32 bits
so about 2.something billion
Oh ok thats enough 
the value is 2.something billion, not digits
if you use uint, you'd have double that, up to 4ish billion, but you can't have negatives with uint, if that at all interests you :p
Thx for the tip 
Sure thing!
Hmm u by any chance familiar with solidity?
Just had to look it up, that's the first I've heard of it. Looks very similar to Typescript, though
Yeah rather typescript than js, its compiler is super strict
function calcPercentage(int elapsedTime){
return round(8000 + (elapsedTime * (100/36))/10000);
}
something along those lines was what I was thinking
If i already have 2 software eng's in here could u take a look at this and mb explain me a bit of whats happening here.
the << syntax is supposedly moving bits to the left?
both encode functions
whats their purpose and whats like the purpose behind shifting bits?
i dont expect a whole course but if u could give me some points to go on about id appreciate it a lot. Im kinda learning by myself anyways but id like to know what to search or what this topic is exactly
I'm no expert on it, since I don't really ever use it in my work, but bit shifting can be very processor efficient if you have something that can be solved with 2^n, such as calculating Fibonacci sequences, etc.
I'm sort of taking a guess here, seems pretty specific to solidity, but if I had to take a guess without researching much, it looks like the first encode function is taking a uint112 (112 bit number? seems too big) and forcing it into a uint224 (twice as big I'd assume) then shifting it 112 times
Yep, bit shifting would be more efficient then doing the squaring to get to that number
damn thx a lot! I kinda understand the purpose of that code finally.
🥳
@novel bane Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @novel bane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how did n-11 get divided out?
they applied the rational root theorem and found that 11 was a root therefore they did the long division behind the scenes
@ruby skiff Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find the orthogonal projection of the given vector on the given subspace W of the inner product space V .
@lone blade Has your question been resolved?
I would start by finding an orthonormal basis for P_1(R). You know how to do that?
@lone blade Has your question been resolved?
I got (1, sqrt 12 (x - 1/2)
I think sqrt 12 should be 2/sqrt(3), but otherwise looks good.
(but I didn't write it down carefully so I could be wrong on the constant too...)
Hah, yeah I didn't do it carefully. Sqrt(12) it is.
Then take inner product of h(x) with each of those. Call the numbers you get A and B... Then the orthogonal projection is A + B sqrt(12)(x-1/2).
isnt the projection the inner product (h,v) times v
.close
Closed by @lone blade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
would i use a double angle formula or compound angle formula to simplify this expression?
$\tan\left(\dfrac{\pi}{12}\right) = \tan\left(\dfrac{\pi}{4} - \dfrac{\pi}{6}\right)$
i just realised
Alex88
thanks
im bad at noticing frations like these
i was tryna figure out what angles would work lol
.close
Closed by @dreamy current
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
the only angles you can really try are 30, 45, 60, 90
yeah but i was working in radians
i know how to do it in degrees but i was tryna force myself to use radians
so id be more accommodated with them
ahhh fair enough
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\ker S = {0} \implies \ker(T \circ S) = {0}$
metnal
let $S,T:V \to V$ be linear operators
metnal
how do i provide a counter example to this?
im not sure how to find the proper vector spaces and the proper linear transformations
what happens when you try to prove it. where does it go wrong?
try to understand that. then it's easy to construct a counterexample
\begin{gather*}
S(\vec{v}) = \vec0 \implies \vec{v} = \vec0\
T(S(\vec{u})) = \vec0\
S(\vec{u}) = \vec0 \implies T(S(\vec{u})) = \vec0\
S(\vec{u}) \neq \vec0 \not\implies T(S(\vec{u})) \neq \vec0
\end{gather*}
this is what i arrived at
but im not even sure how to form a linear transformation
uh
oh wait
its supposed to be \centernot
like
"not implies"
the bot didnt render it correctly
lemme fix it
metnal
cuz u could be another vector and S(u) would be a nonzero vector and T could still output a zero vector for that
the kernel of T isnt limited to the 0 vector
yes
it's about the kernel of T
what's the easiest linear transformation with a non-trivial kernel
i have no idea lol
what's the easiest linear transformation in general
which is the easiest constant
yes but doesnt it just shrink everything to 0
yes
well depends on which vector space
some vector spaces are finite
the point is that it's not trivial
but it contains all the vectors in the vector space im guessing?
yes
makes perfect sense
so for every x we have that T(S(x))=0
Closed by @rich nimbus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ABCD is a quadrilateral, EF makes a 90 degree angle with KF
it also says E, F, K, L is midpoints
the video solving this said to draw a line from E to K and that line would be equal to x
i dont understand how it is equal to x
@unkempt jewel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the equation of a circle having a tangent line of y=3-5x which passes through the point (2,-7) and the center of a circle is contained on the line x=2y+19
Good day, is there anyone who can help me with this problem? Anyone available
<@&286206848099549185>
First of all u have a tangent line slope so u have the inverse of it as well
Am i right?
so that vertical line to the tangent line we found has an equation for itself
its gonna be y = -x/5 + c , cause the slop of tangent line is 5
the vertical slope of the radius line will be -1/5
after finding c by putting the given point (2,-7) in the new equation.
the equation of radius line will have an intersection with the line of center of circle
so that we find the x,y of the circle
Another way (without visual geometry) would be to write down the general equation for a circle centered at (x0, y0) and radius r:
(x - x0)^2 + (y - y0)^2 = r^2
Let y = y(x) and differentiate both sides with respect to x, that gives you tangent slope at every point of the circle. Plug in the given point (2, -7) with the condition that dy/dx = -5 and eliminate x0 by using x0 = 2y0 + 19. Then you can solve for (x0, y0), plug that back into the circle equation and solve for the radius r.
If you don't know calculus, go with XpertTiger's method
@signal trail Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Thos was the working out done by my teacher. I'm not sure why they did divided it by 11.
What I would've done is 10% of 348.85 But I get the wrong answer
the tax is 10% of the pre-tax total, not 10% of the post-tax total
oh, so whwre did they get 11 from
110% of pre-tax total = 348.85
The keyword is “including”
So let $$x$ be total amount.
We actually have $x + 0.1x = 348.85$, so $x = \dfrac{348.85}{1.1}$
Since we want the charged amount, we need to further multiply this quantity by 0.1 to get the final answer 🙂
jimmy1234
we actually just want the tax
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain how he went from indefinite integral cotx dx to ln sin x
Got cut off buts it’s +c at the end
cot(x)dx = cos(x)dx/sin(x)
Set u = sin(x) so that du = cos(x)dx
Then you're integrating 1/u which is just ln|u| => ln|sin(x)|
Ah I see how would I know I’d have to do the setting up u again?
@agile robin Has your question been resolved?
Ok
Closed by @agile robin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would I go about solving this?
i've worked the range out to be -4k ≤ y
oh also
$f(x) = k(x^2 + 4x)$
manu
@dull crypt Has your question been resolved?
@dull crypt Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> pls ;(
if u want to find k then plug any number in the function
like
$f(1) = k(1^2 + 4*1)$
True
Closed by @dull crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey
<@&286206848099549185>
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
ok but you avalaiable?
Well you didn't even ask a question
well I wanted to start a conversation
but ok
here it it
I just dont know how to start
special right triangle
thats my teachers answers
do you understand why (x)° is 45°?
If you read #❓how-to-get-help, you would know the way to start a channel is to post your question and wait, not start a conversation
Do you know the 90/45/45 triangle
Because a square will have all 90 degree angles, correct?
And 90/2 is 45
So x is 45 degrees
pinging helpers before 15minutes and before asking a proper math question implying that you didn't read the rules or the auto generated message directly above may be considered hostile (quite the opposite of friendly)
but it should all equal 180 yes? so it could be 30 and 60?
oh wait
no
dont say anything i get it
lol
Or because it's an isosceles triangle, you already know that one of the angles is 90, so you have two other angles that are equal to each other
is me saying hey being unfriendly?
saying hey is friendly,
pinging helpers like that is not
like dam guys i didnt mean to make yall upset
It's fine to start a conversation, #prealg-and-algebra or #geometry-and-trigonometry would be better suited for conversations.
sorry I just needed help and I got it thanks
ok other question
if you jsut have that one leg
how would you tell if its supposed to be a 30 60?
Starting a conversation is better suited in #discussion or #serious-discussion
Getting help typically means posting your question first, what you tried and following the rules, like what that auto generated message states
it really depends on what info you're given and have to work with
if you're just given one leg of a triangle and literally nothing else, there isn't much to say about that triangle
But because we know it's a square and we know the sides are congruent there is multiple ways to prove it's 45 degrees for both
same principle as the previous question
Well, y will be 45 degrees which makes the other 45 degrees as well
IE this statement is useful
so is there another way to show that x is 45?
So x is 17sqrt(2)
So x is 17sqrt(2)
no
Sorry, other way around, 17/sqrt(2)
Yes, as dldh06 said, isosceles triangle
90/2 is applied in one way or another
but 30 and 60 equals 180 too
It's because it's an isosceles triangle
Isosceles means that two sides are the same length
This is true but with the given image, the triangle has two equal sides hence an isosceles triangle
Closed by @frail lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185> I do not know where to get started, I know the ending point and im pretty sure I am supposed to use SVD
would differentiating this equation give x + lambda^T A?
<@&286206848099549185>
would this be correct?
.close
Closed by @royal rover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I find the coordinates for the point of contact, I have a line: y = mx and a curve: y= x^2+6x-4, the value of m is 2 or 10; how would I find the coordinates of the point of contact? Can someone please explain this to me, thanks.
point of contact
will be the solution of a simultaneous equation
ok here's an example
ooohh but which equations should I take
alright
the only two that you are given
OOOOOOOOO
consider the point they intersect
TY
Tysm
cool
.close
Closed by @jaunty dew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
glad I helped
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@celest kettle
i got a question
ok
i don't really understand what they're asking here
Find the measures of a complementary angle, a supplementary angle, and a vertical angle for an angle with the given measure: 47 degrees
@celest kettle
vertical...
i couldn't really understand what they were trying to ask
bc they just said find the measures of a complementary angle
like did they mean the angle that's not 47 degrees
if a is the complementary angle of b, a+b=90°
me neither natural language is hard
.close
Closed by @sonic herald
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
but I'm trying my best ig
wdym natural language
aka english
o
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So i know that if I plugged in 0 for x that the limits on some of these functions would not exist
but if i multiplied
0 by 0
it would return 0
ok lets start with the first one, does the limit of floor(6x) exist?
its floor
idek what floor is
wait what
We were never taught that
Could you try to explain what floor is?
floor basically just rounds down your number,
floor(x) returns the maximum integer z with z≤x
floor(6.3) = 6
floor(4.9) = 4
floor(5) = 5
floor(-1) = -1
floor(-2.5) = -3
oh ok so here floor 6 = 6 got it
just like in programming
so back to your original question
hmm, why would it be infinite?
we go x -> 0+
so as x approaches 0 from the right side?
so the limit
for that fn dosent exist right?
and same for g(x) on the first one
?
the right side limit does exist
O_O
what is floor(0.1)?
