#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 513 of 1
I'm taking about how we communicate
Well that's a little different
really if you feel a book uses too many immediates
move to another book or something simpler
or if theres no more options then just go read the original papers
We communicate mathematics by: 1. Writing textbooks, 2. Giving talks, 3. Writing papers 4. Teaching courses 5. Casual talks with close friends etc
many times they are way more urgh
this is also a poor argument against the use of the word being wrong.
it's akin to saying "if you don't like uncle being racist, don't go to family events"
That doesn't change that the uncle is being harmful, just explaining how to possibly handle a shitty situation
All of this is communication
i disagree
it's literally
That's different alex
a super different thing
And when we communicate, we should be mindful of how our communication can be recieved
Saying "it's obvious" is not inherently harmful
there are so many books written at various targetted levels
your job is to find what suits you
if your uncle is racist then whatever just break ties or something if it becomes too obnoxious lol
:petTheCat:
Damn I went full libertarian
someday i need to write a script to send things as gifs instead of buying nitro
but im lazy
zzz
Same
honestly
if it was easier to get paid to just
write better software out there or write better materials
I got a bit more energy to argue this point, so I'll continue.
Emma, having "obvious" be default as okay is harmful
would be so much better
not as default, but as signalling what level you're aiming for
Then I am okay with obvious
Ari, I might be down to continue the "uncle" discussion later since it is a good thing to adress, however it would be hard to have two productive convos at once
nah i also have no energy to deal with family members being obnoxious LOL
Because at that point they should be able to quit the book if they don't like the language
Same Ari
yea
I cut ties with most of my family
Alright, so we're moving onto the "move onto another book" discussion
The problem with that argument is that very good information could be put in a shitty book
And if we just say that its okay to portray information in that manner, we make the community of math information less accessible
honestly i feel like at undergrad level
there are books catering to all kinds of people
those who prefer a more verbose text
Yeah that's been blowing up
and those who prefer a more succint text
For a while
personally i prefer texts that uses more "clearly" instead of spelling out every damn detail
ikr
details are annoying for me but essential for some
same i jus skip bulk of the proof if it's all relatively straightforward
Like the way I read books is to read the narrative and fill in the gaps in my head
Yeah
yee
Solid point. However, I think there are slight changes we can make to our vocabulary to make such books less repellent to those who don't like "clearly" but like terse language
meanwhile my boyfriend needs me to spell out all the missing detail
eh i feel like just need to make less "standardized undergrad textbooks" and more of "here are some options see what suits your style"
rip
Fair point
But yeah for me I fill in all the gaps myself anyway and that's how I actually learn
same i cant rlly learn by reading all the details
So I don't even notice when it says obvious
Because I don't look at the arguments usually
Lol
Yeah I guess I'm a bad case to generalize from
we are like the one extreme lol
the kind of psychos that would read jacksons and call it "a bedtime storybook"



though an objection to this is that as a class, its often beneficial to all be following the same book. In such cases, the students wouldn't be able to pick a book they enjoy. Also, going out and finding which book you enjoy can waste time in a classroom setting
tbf i havent actually attended math classes cuz i find lectures too boring LOL but i suppose so
Yeah same
I am very bad at going to class
This may be an ADHD/ASD thing for me tbh
The way I do math
it's just sleep deprivation for me tbh 8am classes should be illegal
Lol
I agree
I taught at 9 am 2 years ago
Never again
I had to travel for 50 minutes to get there too
It was
It was also teaching high schoolers who were taking a college class
So it was worse
yikes

honestly high sch low undergrad lvl is the hardest to teach
i personally prefer teaching people once their foundations has been built (for piano or for math)
And they were being made to take college algebra
yikessss
honestly in theory possible
One of them had taken calculus previously
All had done well in precalculus
So they didn't actually care about anything
In the class
Yeah
So many levels of shittyness
Also yeah I was going to sleep at like 3-4 am

jus need to keep a mental note 24/7 "please do not scream at anyone keep a poker face sound nice AHHHHHHHHHHH"
@rose dock what did u get in for do you think
I'm not gonna lie: I have no idea
Cause ppl with much better stats than me got rejected, idk what happened
Literally the valedictorian got waitlisted at UCSD and UCSB lol
I had a 3.56 GPA at time of application, and since it was test-blind, my relatively better SAT wouldn't've helped me either
What rly that’s insane
Yeah my strong point was my ACT
But they didn’t look at that
So idk bruh
might be the fact that my 10th and 11th grade performance was much stronger than my 9th grade performance
plus the number of APs I've taken
Ah
I mean I got a 5 on three out of six ap exams
That’s like, garbage compared to many other people
It’s just so weird
I got a 5 on 9 out of 10 AP exams
Holy christ
the valedictorian at my school got rejected too
or, waitlisted
the valedictorian at my school is going go harvard
so did a girl at around rank 5-10
p cool
Jeez
and the valedictorians gf
Lol wow
there's people who got into both Caltech and MIT at my school who got rejected
it's crazy
the salutatorian is going to a community college bc her bf is going there
:(
What rly
I'm #68 :husk:
R u a senior
yeah
one away
im a senior
I’m #35
nice
Did u get in anywhere cool
UF
68/619 or smth like that
University of Florida
Nice
Ah
I'm probably gonna do meth
Me too bro
I'll probably tack on either a CS or physics double major too
oof
Gl bruh
Have you seen what’s going on at berkeley
CS70, a prereq for many cs classes, is being barred from people who didn’t declare CS on their application
At least I think that’s what’s happening
either berkeley or UCLA didn't have a 2nd choice
But I think that’s mostly at the engineering college
whatever, I'm fine if I can't do CS
I want to try physics but it’s always been annoying when I take a class in it
The extent of the math is just remembering formulas
Most of it is labs and basic knowledge
also can't math 55 substitute for eecs 70 if ur double majoring?
Not sure
Ah
I heard from a friend that some dude took like 202A and 250A freshman year
for math
I might want to try and copy that dude 

I know one such person
There is still plenty of time to do whatever you want if you do 202A and 250A in sophomore year
202A and 250A are hard
But then again repeating stuff is kind of silly. So that's up to you. I definitely recommend checking out 202A/250A but keeping your options open and being ready and willing to swap them out for less crazy classes
Ok, 250A is with borcherds so you can get a sense for how that will be from the various series on his youtube channel
202A is with rieffel and that class is pretty tough but doesn't move too quickly, which is good
The homeworks are really interesting but take a lot of thinking
ye I saw some of the homework assignments already. I know a bit of measure theory already, so I think I should be somewhat prepared for 202A.
ye 250A is the one that I think I'll have more trouble with
I never actually took 250A
It was a trainwreck in my sophomore year so I swapped it for something else at the same time
It conflicted with an important class in junior year
And then it conflicted with another important class in senior year, and was also a trainwreck that year (so I didn't keep up with recordings after a bit)
This was with nadler
No it swaps around a lot
Borcherds was the professor the year it wasn't a trainwreck
He's good
he's just a bit fast
ye main concern for me is actually getting into the classes
Ribet was the other time it was a trainwreck
People drop these so I don't know if that's a huge issue
But
Hard to be sure
ye also if I take 202A, will I still have to take like 104?
or would they substitute it
They're typically pretty amenable about substitutions
Though I would talk to a math dept advisor about this stuff when you get there
They're usually very nice and helpful, and don't tell you to take it super easy or anything in my experience
(The L&S college advisors are very unhelpful in this regard)
ye I'll definitely have to talk with an advisor, although I'm a bit intimidated cuz idk how any of the advisor/course selection stuff in college works
I want to take a class like this but I don’t want to die freshman year
well I like pain
You pretty much just drop into their offices on the 9th floor when they're around (most of the day mon-fri i think?) and introduce yourself and what your situation is. It's not very formal.
There might be a few people waiting before you at the beginning of the sem.
would I have to email the professors to ask to get into the course?
or would just going thru the advisors be fine
Umm, oftentimes for grad courses you do need to fill out a form to get permission to enroll.
Let me see
@rose dock what math do you already know
uhhh
Fall 2022
Catalog Nbr,Title,Instructor Name,Requirements for Undergraduate Enrollment,Enrollment Procedure
202A,TOPOLOGY & ANALYSIS,Rieffel,Marc A,No Restrictions,Instructor consent not required. Please submit F22 Graduate Enrollment Request Form to be granted a permission code.
204,ORDINARY DI...
Here
I would angle towards not going crazy freshman year. I barely went crazy and I still basically ran out of classes I wanted to take by the end.
Ah here is the site I got that from
Sorry
That site has the link to the form
Under "if you are an undergrad and would like to take grad courses"
like baby rudin chapters 1-7, a bit of measure theory, and a tiny bit of complex anal. Topology, I only really know what I picked up from analysis/diff geo. Algebra is a bit weaker, only group and ring theory.
I see, thanks
So you don't need instructor permission for these courses.
Yeah my general idea is that I’ll take these courses a year later, when I’m actually ready for it, so why go through the pain
202A and 250a.
That is what I did
And I guess I did all the actual math major requirements except for math 53
(multivariable)
and math 54 (linear algebra)
I just had them count other stuff for those
I’m taking multivariable/diff eq rn, would they take that credit or nah
I'm probably gonna do 54, cuz I'm considering double major with CS
@rose dock ryc suggested cs61a, apparently it’s really good
ye I was planning on taking CS61A too
The school will but for the purposes of the math major you will basically just tell them "this class subsumes the material from 53, so use it to fulfill that requirement)
61 series is great, I did it in sophomore year.
And 61c / 170 in junior (61c = computer architecture, 170 = advanced algorithms)
have you taken the physics 5 series?
Consider H54. If you don't know ANY linear algebra it might be a bit of a pain I guess.
I don't know
H54 is a much smaller class size. Peng Zhou is teaching it this fall who i've had, he's good.
No. I just took Physics 137A (quantum mech)
I was gonna take 5a-c but they seem very unpleasant.
oh I learned linear algebra from axler
Can you learn linear algebra from artin’s algebra text
I'm not sure why you'd take 54
idk what I could substitute for it
so I was planning on doing 54(H) -> 16B
Do you know any EE stuff?
not really
This was also my plan (well, 110 -> 16B and then force them to accept 110) but then I changed my mind and didn't bother with the CS major.
I guess I have knowledge of circuits at the level of AP Physics C
That is also what I had
And they were like "see if you can do the 16A problem sets"
and I was like "I can't really, but whatever, it'll be fine"
So who knows how that would have turned out
I see
actually it does seem like I should probably take 16A instead of 54H
what did you substitute for 53?
Hey, any ideas how to stress less before an important math exam?
The best thing would be to be super prepared cause then you’re confident and less nervous
The thing is that I am always super prepared, but still have somewhere in mind that I could do more :/
Honestly, if you study enough and provide all the necessary information that shows how you achieved that answer, you'll be fine
Have you taken practice tests and consistently done really well
In my experience that’s when I have the most confidence
The other way to not be nervous is to not care about the result of the test, but of course that’s probably not possible here lol
Yes, I did a mock test and got 95%
My main problem is that the only mistakes I make are some small calculations ones
and beside that everything is fine
:/
126 pdes

this is pretty funny out of context
I took that before any analysis which was a big mistake
thinking that you did 126 pdes 
lol
Not sure if this is the place for this, but anyone want to start a small analysis or rigorous calculus study track/group?
If you’re doing this for a class then you should try to meet up with people from ur school
That’s what most teachers recommend
Work together on the homework but write up ur own
I’ m independent actually
Independent?
Self studying
Nice
wait wtf today has a different sequence of primes
i didnt notice and used my usual strategy
and it didnt work LMAO
huh
i always thought they started with a bunch of 2s though
did i just get lucky every time
ic
i havent played every day so i guess i just missed the days where it didnt
yeah i can imagine if i didnt waste all my good guesses thinking "wtf how did i mess up the math"
oh yeah if i wasnt an idiot that's literally exactly what i wouldve done
idk if theres a "more optimal" strategy but ||just "count up by the denominator until you can classify solutions" seems fairly consistent||
at the very least it makes the math easy lmao
by "math" i mean
"grade school arithmetic"
screw subtraction
nah i mean like
if you make random guesses like 459 and 337 and whatnot
you're gonna have to do some NASTY 3-digit subtraction
at some point
(unless you go for the truly optimal strategy, which is just "guess randomly 10 times")
(it only has a 1% winrate, sure, but it minimizes the amount of time you waste playing Zpordle and lets you do more productive things.)
of course i am
Okay good
well i didnt this time because i gave up when i realized i fucked it lmao
When I fuck it up I just open it in incognito
And do up until I fuck it up
And forget what I guessed
Oh lol
There's only one strategy though
So it's pretty boring
Hmm
Go on

I mean that's not viable
So I'm not even going to consider it

it is if you invest your level-ups into your luck stat.
Well unfortunately I invested everything into my neuroticism stat
i wonder what stats would actually be optimal to level up IRL
probably charisma and luck
int isnt bad
This is some Isekai tier shit
I once unironically said that I thought int was the only stat that mattered
res would probably be a pretty shite stat
actually wait
does res also protect against like, stress and mental illness
resilience
yeah res/con/whatever you call it
I need some res buffs
dnd stats dont have luck tho
so i assumed we're not using those
i was just going with generic jrpg stuff
and res is commonly "magic resistance"
yeah but magic is often conflated with like, mental damage and stuff
so im thinking it wouldnt be a stretch to say it helps you stay focused and level-headed and sane
probably more useful than like
Evasion
how many times have you needed to dodge shit
just seduce the robber with charisma

it's not quite the same thing as what we're discussing but i do adore disco elysium's stat system
i'd pour everything into inland empire and live in a world of my own delusions.
visual calculus you say
in narrative you play a detective, so its your ability to get sketches of events from things like skid marks, footprints, bullet holes
i recall it being very useful at like 2 points
and otherwise kinda dead
is it fine if i don’t completely get or am not good at everything the first time around doing linear algebra?
I don't think you're supposed to get everything the first time right. As long as you grasped the important concepts, you can always come back to revisit the smaller details when you revise.
The first time I did linear algebra, I could not for some reason grasp simple concepts like matrix factorizations and change of basis. I'd say this is pretty normal.
thanks, that’s kinda what’s stumping me, except it’s diagaonization
i can regularly do at least maybe half of the exercises so i guess that’s good
Yeah, diagonalization is a bit hard to understand at first, I think. When I first did it, I was just told to memorise A = PDP^-1 without knowing why it worked.
the book i’m using for it randomly mentioned the P part of diagonalization without really explaining it unfortunately
i’m referring to this, P = Q here
i don’t even know what theorem 2.23 is referring to lol
This is the explanation given in my book. I'm using a more non-math book though, because it doesn't mention general fields F like I'm guessing your book does.
Im guessing that Q is the existence of an invertible matrix
and you construct it using basis beta
snd the theorem 2.23 states that maybe
What book is that, by the way?
friedberg linear algebra
Ah. I'm using a scrub book probably made for engineers. 
i don’t see a “theorem 2.23” in the book
I use friedberg
friedberg is nice
Let me see what you’re saying
I use Lay's Linear Algebra and Its Applications. I only chose it because it looked pretty. 
Oh that was someone else
I'm sure I'm gonna need to read Friedberg or another theoretical book in the future.
Friedberg or Lang’s intro are good
Considering the book I'm using doesn't go into stuff like Jordan canonical form and dual spaces.
Yeah a lot of books either choose theory heavy or application heavy
Depends what your goal is and how much math you’ve seen (or what you intend to do)
I'm going with less theory for my first round through and then doing the theory stuff later.
Like I'm trying to mostly self-learn first year undergrad material at the moment, so I'm reading books which are less theory-heavy.
Oh cool!
I learnt a bit of this stuff already, but I quite literally forgot everything.
I remembered doing ODEs, but I can't remember a thing about how to solve them now. So I'm revisiting stuff, and writing notes this time, to try to remember better.
Meh, no big deal. Always easier to relearn or remember upon seeing
Hard problems help too
Those fuckers imprint the material to your mind
Good point. I should try more of them.
Hope to get past this material soon, because some of the more advanced stuff like complex analysis sounds super interesting to me.
My personal experience with linear algebra was everything started making sense like 2 weeks to a month after I first saw the material
most of the stuff actually makes sense so far, it’s really just the diagonalization stuff
So I'd do one topic, go onto the next, and then the previous topic started to make sense
Guys, what does this syntax mean?
I've never seen the parentheses with the two bounds of a sum before
The sum of binomial coefficients from i = 0 to i = k.
$\binom{k}{i} = \frac{k!}{(k - i)!i!}$
PhenomPlasma
wait though
doesn't the expression get kinda screwed if i = 0?
it's k choose i
Nah, 0! = 1, so you're fine.
is this how we pronounce it?
yea
n! is the number of ways to arrange n objects in a line in order. If you think about it that way, there is 1 way to arrange 0 objects (i.e. not put anything at all), hence 0! = 1.
I forgot the definition of a factorial, so that's on me
if you have a set of k objects, k choose i is the number of combinations of i objects you can form from that set
thanks for Le Remindere
I see, so the binomial coefficients according to pascal
or rather, their sum
in the case here
just as our friend PhenomPlasma said
anyway, I'll get back to reading! Thanks a lot, you two! :D
Yeah, it's the sum, which comes up when you try to do binomial expansion.
phoneme plasma
you are now obligated to change your name to PhonemePlasma
also, your pfps are quite adorable
epic taste
Haha, thanks. Changed it for April Fool's, but I actually like it, so I'm gonna keep it for a bit.
i wanna be a horse one day
Ah, aspiring horse. A mighty ambition indeed.
I think you're getting pretty good at it :o
Is there even a channel that would be well fit for relational algebra or is that too unbased to be covered in this server?
I mean #groups-rings-fields is a thing
just don't expect a ton of people to know what relational algebra is
if it's about algorithms or stuff there's #numerical-analysis
what do you guys think of the math sorcerer youtube channel, is his advice good and useful or is it mostly rehashed self help?
oh lmao looks like my same question was asked this morning
it seems that opinions about him are divisive
If Jeremy has 3 apples. Why does he ware blue clothing?

you’re welcome
Ok,I just realised pedagogy could actually be a useful skill outside teaching
If you understand the mindset behind how people in a particular field think,you can learn that field easier compared to not doing that
is there a general name or anything for this particular type of inner product on function spaces?:
$<f_1, f_2> = \int_a^b f_1(x) f_2(x) \dd{x}$
CoolShot
yeah in the future
please just send it to modmail
rather than doing it publicly
@odd narwhal I hear you like espresso
Perhaps
Im thinking of doing a dynamical systems project regarding that
Interesting
do you know of any particular things i could look in depth at that might exhibit some tasty bifurcations
ive been thinking about it, but nothing really stands out to me id say
Hmmm
You could look at how the initial distribution of grounds in the portafilter affects flow maybe? That might be hard to model
hmm
This is generally very important for espresso making. Uneven distribution causes channels and destroys.your extraction
yup. Indeed indeed, I can see why that might be hard to model
maybe some analysis regarding proportions of fines
look at results post shot with a refractometer or something to give me more intution on building the model
thing is i would love to find something that exhibits period doubling/chaotic behavior
i guess we will see
driven damped pendulum
Per the mods, I apologize for any disruption I caused and any inappropriate comments made. It will not happen again.
textbook example of a system that exhibits period doubling and chaotic behavior
I wasn't, but alright.
i wanna do something espresso related though ahha
ah
I don't know if you'll find smth like that but I have no intuition for espresso flow
oh i got it
Like maybe under certain circumstances you'll see that with channeling?
affix an espresso puck to the end of a thin wire
Yeah, thats the thing. I have a lack of intuition for espresso flow on this end as well
then turn the expresso puck into a damped driven pendulum
tru
ok i got a lil dilemma on my hands
i love physics
i love math
and i will most likely need CS sometime in my future if i go down the CS side of quantum computing
but my uni does not offer CS as a minor
so then i have two options: Physics and CS majors + math minor or triple major
the last one sounds batshit insane so i will probably not do that
but god i love math and i dont want to miss out on mathy stuff just because i do a minor
so just how much of math will i miss out on if i do a minor?
from an undergrad perspective
Why don't you do what interests you
If you want to learn math, you can do it in your free time
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
i already do that but i wont get to do the fun math classes, right?
I think a CS major is broad enough that if your interest is firmly in the intersection with physics you probably dont need a full major
sure i could still learn it on my own time
Like if you're literally just into quantum computing and nothing else i feel like you could just take a few CS courses focused on that specifically
rather than a full major
true, but I do want to keep the door open for the potential that i’ll do something other than quantum computing
thats fair
If there will be fun math classes
because rn im leaning more towards the research side of quantum computing
or maybe even just quantum sensors
but that’s a diff thing
there’s a few that catch my eye
wrote it down somewhere and dont remember what they were but they did catch my eye
maybe i could just walk into the lecture and listen in anyways
At the end of the day it's your choice
yeah im just trying to figure out what would be the most sensible for the future
though i can turn math into a major and drop cs if i decide on doing that. i guess i have a decent amount of flexibility for the next four years
That sounds fair
If you're absolutely confident you want to do physics then you can focus on that first and sort of split your attention between math/CS
According to statistics, you probably won't stay in uni doing research
and then go with whichever you'd be more interested in
true
So for better future you might want to do more physics and CS
Math has a huge appeal but it's a little ... you know
i dont know what you’re referring to tbh
It's hard to apply it to anything concrete
Easier to do that with physics and CS
also true
man i miss when i was in elementary school
no worries in life
just field trips
You'll be older you'll have to pay the bills
And you have better way of doing that if you learn physics/CS
Yeah, it's harsh truth 
👏
Well done! You have actually used two Heaviside step functions in the denominator
Indeed I have ^-^
Took some time to find out how to make one since I just saw it defined the way you solved my question yesterday, but I made it work 
https://www.reddit.com/r/196/comments/tvxcd3/trans_man_realizes_how_affection_starved_men_are/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
an interestingly depressing post
Can confirm

Wait, it isn't really a Heaviside function, is it?
A Heaviside function is defined for x = 0 (H(0) = 1), but this one isn't
The value at x = 0 does not really matter for the Heaviside function, it can be anything. Usually, it's defined as 0, 1/2, or 1, depending on the application
Is no value also okay? 🤔
You can exclude 0 from the domain of definition if you want to
So I can call $\frac{\frac{x+3}{|x+3|}+1}{2}$ a Heaviside function even though there's no value (for x=0 lol)*?
Asgard
This expression is defined for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$ except for $-3$, so if $\mathbb{R}\setminus{-3}$ is your domain of definition, it defines a valid function (which I still would call a Heaviside function)
Alright, thanks! :D
Zanarcane
cringe
i cringe at your message saying cringe
i cringe at you and your cringe isnt significant
my cringe >>>
you cringe at my cringe when infact it is based
based cringe
sir what
So what does the server pfp represent?
Like is a plane of space or is it a graphing function
it's a torus
it's a coffis cup
tokidoki
...
what's intimacy again?
Closeness.
I'm late but good post
and it is a conspiracy against me specifically
So is a torus like a magnetic field?
it's a shape
But like what defines it
set of all points some distance from a circle
Uhhhh.......?
I WAS RIGHT
think about it
it's also formulated by a cartesian product
or is it
(yes)
but just because you're right doesn't mean that I'm wrong
I actually don't know enough to say if you're wrong
So it's the shape of a particular accelator or donut or smth
S¹ × S¹
What is S?
yeah
Does it always have such a representation?
S^2 is the sphere, S^3 is the 3-sphere, and so on
yeah, although if the distance is greater than whatever radius the circle has it's self-intersecting (cringe)
trippy
Well if a torus is S1xS1 wouldnt that make is S2 which is a sphere?
Anyway I think my definition is better - it's standard
no
the powers don't work like that
$S^2 \not \cong S^1 \times S^1$
they just say what dimension it's in
Wew "Dreaming Discs" Tbh 💿
This topoloygy?
S^2 is the smash product of S^1 and S^1 though I believe
Smash ?!
This is not helping newcomers
shame
But if you replace a with a variable like 3, it's 3x3=9
it's a set
So like it represents multiple values?
Honestly I think Wikipedia's starting line is a good starting point
torus (plural tori, colloquially donut or doughnut) is a surface of revolution generated by revolving a circle in three-dimensional space about an axis that is coplanar with the circle.
oh look what I said
@vagrant moss If you can understand that, then you know what's a 2-torus
I'd like all the set people above to stick to Euclidean geometry first
Is 2torus like a chain?
It's a donut [EDIT] surface - it's specifically hollow
Then what's the difference between a torus and 2torus
You need to understand how the donut is a cartesian product
The standard torus being discussed is a 2-torus. The 1-torus is a circle.
Oh oki
it's the surface of a doughnut
Focus on this
This is right.
So would a 3torus include a 4th dimension?
Not sure how it looks if you try to project it down
You can understand it's shape but not its depth in a lower dimension right?
a 3-torus is locally 3-dimensional
wherever you are
it looks like 3d euclidean space at that point
Like idk what Euclidean is or what a set is or what S is used for or anythin
euclidean space is like
normal space
Makes it hard to talk honestly, hmm.
But you can think of Euclidean as the usual space you work with
1d Euclidean space is an infinite line
Oh so like dimensions?
2d euclidean space is an infinite plane
3d is an infinite 3d space etc
0d euclidean space is a single point
Oh so it's like a theoretical space for math
Hm?
you've done calculus?
Try to explain it normally and I can say what I don't understand
most of the functions you see normally
like sine function and the squared function
So like f(x)^2?
no
like f such that f(x) = x²
this function is (at least at first) defined from real numbers to real numbers
do you know what a real number is
ok
good
that will make this much easier
so
the real numbers
can be interpreted as 1-d euclidean space
because it's just an infinite line
yes
but
that can apso be represented in terms of real numbers
specifically by combining two real lines
R¹ × R¹ ≈ R²
OH
and you can keep going like that
So basically your making two of the lines instead of multiplying the values
And how would that work?
Huh
And what are Euclidean spaces used for in the real world
Or is it just theoretical
our universe acts like euclidean space
the complex plane can be thought of as the xy plane where the x axis is the real part of a+ib and the y axis is the imaginary part of a+ib
at least as far as we can see
it's another example of 2d euclidean space
hey guys, sorry to bother but can somebody give me a hand on #latex-help
thanks
So if we had a quantum computer, we can make a Euclidean space and simulate parts or the universe?
i don’t know what a quantum computer has to do with this
Its a powerful computer that can simulate lots of things at a faster rate 🤷♂️
I just used it Bc if we had one, it would work for simulations
we can already simulate euclidean space
We can simulate infinity??
you can simulate part of it
a quantum computer can't do this anyway
And a quantum computer can simulate a bigger part
i mean
🤷♂️
if you have a supercomputer
vs a small weak quantum computer
which one is going to work better
Depends how small
Bc I'm pretty sure quantum computers use atoms as the binary for the computer
So positive and negative charges
i mean
Hm?
Euclidean space is a model of our physical space, where you can measure angles and lengths
And where parallel lines don't intersect
Most of classical mechanics take place in Euclidean space
So it's a theoretical world with ideal conditions for math
Yeah
Well then back to my original question before that, what would a Torus be used for
XD
But why-
topologically equivalent
coz they're homeomorphic
cringe
Homophobic?
homeomorphic you mean, not that i know anything about this
quantum would never stoop so low as to know something in topology
Idek what topology is 😎
Tori are also used for computer games where if you go out of screen, you return back from the other side
homeomorphic is just the technical term to what you said lol
Never even heard of it until today
i know
That's just a loop
i was correcting your misspelling
A circle is a 1D torus
Then say loop
So then it was invented for its use of its versatility between its dimensions?
Imagine gluing the top side of the screen with the bottom side
And the left side with the right side
You would get a donut
because it's useful
you can connect the two ideas
wrapping around
and the surface of a doughnut
Too confusing for my algebra 2 brain 😔
You guys just keep repeating the same stuff in different ways
wdym
I get what it is but idk what for in real life
uh
bragging rights
Like how in the world is a torus a coffee cup
📝📝📝📝📝📝
because they kinda work the same way
in terms of paths
So then this server is represented by a torus which means this server is people bragging??
I'm so smart
wym, the server icon is a coffee mug
it's not really useful in real life
it's not, it's just that mathematicians like to make play games
Mb mb
wym, its a straw
The server icon has always been a looping game screen
they say "what would happen if we played according to these rules?"
long donut
Soooooo if a torus is a coffee cup then how come you can pour coffee into a coffee cup but not a torus 🤔
one is convex the other isn't
in the case of topology they say "what would happen if we were able to morph any shape however we want but without any tearing or creasing"
Oh so it's a ✨inverted✨coffee cup

not really
the hole in the handle becomes the hole in the torus
straw 🤔🤔
any topologists in chat
Does a straw have one or two 🤔🤔🤔
one
speak to me in a year when i have some mild knowledge of topology wew
lmfao who would out themselves as a topologist
jkjk topologists ily
well
if it's hollow inside
Is topology like the study of stupid shapes?
absolutely none of this is in a first topology course lol there's barely any geometric intuition
topology is the study of topological spaces 
look up “3b1b inscribed rectangle”
Smart 📝
and watch the yt vid
wait i can’t tell, is there geometric intuition in an intro topology course or did you mean there isn’t?
Yessir!
and homeomorphisms between them 
i assume there is
there's some but no coffis cup type beat
i thought topology was useless for a while until i watched that vid 👍👍
rip
not in mine anyway
no
it's the study of squishy shapes
And clopen sets
when will i get to donut coffee cup stuff
clopen
clopen
clopen
Oh morbis strip is topology?
the ways you can squish them
and paths on them
morbius 
morbis
ermmm aqktually paths is homotopy not topology 
Close enough?
i swear that's the same field
what was your question again? @vagrant moss
coffis cup
I dunno at this point

A mobius strip is a topological space
don't blame you with all of wew's shitposting
The fact that 👌is a torus, bothers me
A torus is a topological space
I'm rather intoxicated DarQ you must forgive me
tipsy at most
Why would you do that
So topology is making squares in closed shapes?
reps for abelian groups, or as I like to call them, lifted reps of cyclic groups, are boring (over char 0 fields)
no
here
you don't really have the required background to really get what topology is about
Oki
unfortunately
I'm watchin a video on it rn
probs a good idea
3b1b 👍👍
quoted from wikipedia “topology is concerned with the properties of a geometric object that are preserved under continuous deformations, such as stretching, twisting, crumpling, and bending; that is, without closing holes, opening holes, tearing, gluing, or passing through itself.”
i think that’s an understandable explanation?
at least for me
so
squishy shapes
here we have a case of feldspar and quartz
nether quartz
It doesn't have to be geometric objects though (?)
everything is geometric
So basically taking a nice perfect sphere and BRUTALLY SLAMMING IT ON THE WALL
nethere ite
emruld... or
wait i can’t spell
sure as long as it obeys those conditions
Great
everything is topological
Sounds evil
everything is an elliptic curve if you try hard enough
yeah and then you google the definition of a topology and it's nothing like this
ok right right listen listen ok ok
what if right
elliptic curves right
but with y = x^5+bx+c
y² you mean
yeah
crazy how topology starts off with just sets and basically turns into weird geometry
same thing (for y = 1)
scientists go to great lengths for the sake of science
look the same but squished more
like
sharper ig
woahhh

I wonder if there's any specific theory on these curves
this is a weapon
weird looking axe
a weapon of maths disruption 🤣
elliptic axe
deforestation but epic
deforestation⁹⁹
peak comedy wew
thanks quantum
Did and done
holy god there’s 18 pages in this section i’m currently working on, this is gonna take forever 
Hm, I thought that was only when considering Weierstrass’s elliptic
Fair enough
any Abelian variety of complex dimension g is a complex torus of dimension g
so long as you fix a principal polarization, the converse is true
in the case of elliptic curves no


