#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 511 of 1
I don't know
Like doing research in some altruistic field like medicine or climate or something
Stuff like that
I want to help people without having to be a teacher
But it depends on what you’re willing to consider math
Is data science math? It involves math but it’s also coding
Hmm so data analysis/statistics seems like the way to go
I like coding also
Is the math in data analysis interesting?
Well,if you do research it is ig
It’s not original or anything
Then don't do a pedagogy degree
But don’t take my word for it I’m not a data scientist lol
Just do a math degree
They didn’t, I think they phrased the question oddly
mb
Yeah sorry I'm a bit sleepy
Well, Your degree doesn't restrict your actions
I believe biology is making use of topological constructs
Math is a toolset
You can use it to do stuff that are useful in other fields
Like you can probably do some analysis and design robots to do some specific thing
@frozen venture
Topology has been used to study various biological systems including molecules and nanostructure (e.g., membraneous objects[18]). In particular, circuit topology and knot theory have been extensively applied to classify and compare the topology of folded proteins and nucleic acids. Circuit topology classifies folded molecular chains based on the pairwise arrangement of their intra-chain contacts and chain crossings. Knot theory, a branch of topology, is used in biology to study the effects of certain enzymes on DNA. These enzymes cut, twist, and reconnect the DNA, causing knotting with observable effects such as slower electrophoresis.[19] Topology is also used in evolutionary biology to represent the relationship between phenotype and genotype.[20] Phenotypic forms that appear quite different can be separated by only a few mutations depending on how genetic changes map to phenotypic changes during development. In neuroscience, topological quantities like the Euler characteristic and Betti number have been used to measure the complexity of patterns of activity in neural networks.
How difficult is it to pivot into machine learning after graduating with a bachelor's in math?
Do you know any programming languages? If you have experience with programming the transition should be smooth.
But generally, it is a smooth transition. But "machine learning" also entails very different things for different people, so it depends what you intend to do in ML
If you just mean being a practitioner of ML (e.g. at a company), then the transition is very easy and mostly comes down to learning how to use the software tools and some of the common tricks and practices, and then convincing a company to hire you. There will be no intellectual barrier to learning those things.
But research in ML is just as difficult a field as any, and certainly far more competitive than most.
Why do universities expend so much effort silo-ing knowledge
youre gonna have to be a bit more specific than that
what do you mean by 'universities'? admin? profs/researchers? publishing companies?
Mainly the structure of degree-granting programs
what efforts are you referring to? knowledge in what fields?
Most universities, for example, don't offer post-bacc.
And when they do, it's primarily provided for people who want to get into medicine
christ
public unis get subsidies based on how many full degree students they have
so theyre not incentivized to take in others and usually charge more if they do
private unis dont suffer as much here but even then, things like uni ranking metrics like usnews
and scholarship requirements
still incentivize 4 year programs over anything else
I mean, I guess there is the GRE -- and if I'm really incensed take a year "sabbatical" and "do nothing"
I feel like universities should probably look at lateral movement in the sciences, because otherwise the knowledge creation aspect will just turn into humanities/doctrine crap
I mean, I would assume
Is there anyone good at math and physic the same time 
lol
physicists i would hope
i wonder if maths guys know how to make a hand-turkey
how do you called moved on a circle trajectory with the same speed?
uniform circular motion is what they probably call that
the acceleration is like $v^2 \over r$
Lysh
so if i projected on the direction of Ox what is it called
tic-tac-toe? also... what?
I don't know what "in the direction of Ox" means
Reference system
like Oxy
have u studied it in physic
in that case there is not vector acceleration to change the velocity magnitude,only acceleration vector.
so they call it uniform circular movement.
okay
but
do you mean ortogonal plane?
so you wanna graph the result of the function?
bruh, my brain´s ram is stuffed.
can you help me transle this on google because i m so stupid at eng
please, could you rephrase you question, boy?
i´ll do my best to help understand it.
tks 
ortogonal plane
là hình chiếu của chuyển động tròn đều lên trục Ox đúng không
like in this pic
WHAT? please dont lemme think i am wasting time.
ortogonal plane is the projection of uniform circular movement on the Ox right?
and i dont understand why "ortogonal plane is the projection of uniform circular movement on the Ox" but ortogonal plane still have acceleration
so, it is asking if the x´s coord of that yellow ball, has the projection on the x-axis.
do you know what is ortogonal?
he refering the x coord on the yellow ball in the x-axis.
it is a kind of movement that have a limit in space and repeat a lot of time around a balance point
is it the same definition as u
what? i could wrong i thought orthogonal was just generalisation of parallelism.
that would be harmonic movement,a physica phenomenon
or could i be wrong?
bruh
sorry for wasting your time
but when i have got a better english
i will ask again
thank for your time

hey waits, you english seems to be good.
what the question asking if the projection on x-axis is right.
when it was talking about "ortogonal plane" he means the plane formed by two intersecting line with 90 degree angle
right
It's hard to overstate how important the simple harmonic oscillator is in so many areas of physics. Almost every system is an oscillator near a stable equilibrium! Get the notes for free here: https://www.physicswithelliot.com/notes-sign-up
Of all the systems you'll study in your first physics class, the oscillations of a block attached to a sp...
this is what i want to ask about
ah, so you wanna know about harmonic oscillating movements ...right...
what? that does make anysense.
orthogonal plane is from geometry!
oh
pardon, it was just mistake
little mistakes with communication. You´ve learned!
physics also ends here
all of physics is harmonic oscillators
in physic we use orthogonal plane to make different velocity into a line by using sin cos tan so we can easy to calculate bruh
but that not means the orthogonal planes is a harmonic oscillator.
it a tool to help understand and graph the phenomena
like in this pic M1=cosMOM1*M
same by quantum harmonic oscillator
quantum field theory? imagine harmonic oscillators at every point in space
i gonna sleep thanks for help i will comebak tomorrow 
my god, you got me there. harmonic oscillators...
no, it equals to the learning process
welcome to my friend list.
i have tea and cake
(virtually...cake and tea,but well,you can grasp"
19 years old
computer science.
i pass on the exams just one time. then got into uni.
i´ve need to make that exam again. it just first time.
i was bad only in history... man
and the rest of humanities...

i am IT technician(fancy name,hum?). do some computer hardware stuff recently.
and software too
and the clients got virus from unknown place.
or dont know how to boot up the computer the right way.
I think most of them get viruses watching some questionable videos
and he was that,humm, philosopher.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle
Aristotle (; Greek: Ἀριστοτέλης Aristotélēs, pronounced [aristotélɛːs]; 384–322 BC) was a Greek philosopher and polymath during the Classical period in Ancient Greece. Taught by Plato, he was the founder of the Lyceum, the Peripatetic school of philosophy, and the Aristotelian tradition. His writings cover many subjects including physics, biolog...
Hmm so do you recommend any good virus scan app?
my job not related that, but i do some C,C# and bit C++. i have this,humm, humble ascii engine.
c++ was damn hard for me
I know a little bit c++
i respect you for learning that
I used to study pascal but now pascal is old
it was fun, C is fun and C++ is fun too. it makes me think more about algorithms
but my major language is C#
i have this ascii games in C#
now i am trying to create some fancy 3d
well, normally, i would recommend to well "be you own app scam".
but , avast seems to be decent,on win10
I'm from south korea
wait that wasn't a question for me
Nah i like South Korea
from good old,Brazil
Nice i don't have win 10 

south korea? humm, you have the most internet speed.
good ol´ win7?
but internets censored here
Brazil
it nice to meet you,dear
and government sites require third party softwares to function
nice to meet you too
i like vietnam too
i've actually travelled to hanoi a long time ago
Yeh 
Welcome to our math server. nice to meet you,dear!
but I was like 6 back then so i really dont remember anything
i think there is still a version of avast for win7
I'm gonna sleep it is 11pm

Me 5:30 
,ti mark
User cancelled member selection.
well,i think you brain would be fine-ish with 3 hours of sleep.
if you do that only rarely.
,ti mark noel
This user hasn't set their timezone! Ask them to set it using ,ti --set.
hi
hello 👋
ti --set
Wah?
3hour is enough?
,ti --set
3 hours of REM sleep
Hi
sleep is good for the brain!
we humans so we need to rest;biological beings,anyways.
Your timezone has been set to Asia/Seoul!
Your current time is 12:59 AM (KST) on Wed, 30/03/2022.
not just 3 hours of sleep
hi
oof
probably should go sleep
im currently doing military service
lol
but not in the army
if he manager to get in this stage,if this little time, so the brain could still do some cleanup.
yep
(im not doing service, coz im not in SK)

true
tbh military draft is one of the worst aspects of south korea
but its not easy to get into REM sleep instantly
though I have been extremely lucky and got a easy job
man, if the general knows you are wake, what he would do?
u have how much time left in service?
2nd year?
yes
damn i guessed that
is south Korea dictatorship?
sorry i donk remember well some of the geography class
I was a sophomore before leaving for military
How can you are wake bruh
I don't care about dictatorship but South Korea have good food 
which food do you like
Chicken feet with no bones
so you have pretty trendy tastebuds lol
Don't know how it called but i like it
I like pho with a bunch of corriander in it
but koreans don't use corriander which is a shame
They just sold trendy food here not alot of type
But they put big spring onion on soup right
Baro onion?
idk about that

btw how did you get into learning mathematics
I'm studying physic and there are some math idk
So i try to find some server that i can ask
i changed major from economics after taking a semester of math courses
i would like to learn physics but don't know where to start
some people say that I have to study high school physics before tackling university physics textbooks
others say that i should dive straight into college textbook
I'm in high school 
not for me
Grade 10
bye

it is hell for me as well
classical mechanics...
on, in korea culture, they seems to be get hard on people to study more and more?
actually, they teach little concepts
sorry, because i hear somewhere the korea parent tends to be very "hard to pleasant"
but design test questions to get people wrong
they are especially like that when the kid is little
but as they grow up parents realize the truth and become more lenient in most cases
but some parents are just insane/cruel
but they tends to put pleasure to kids get into college, have the greatest grades...
oh,my God.
actually they got much more lenient compared to like 20~30 years ago
unemployment is high and house prices have soared too much
now parents know that studying doesnt equal to being successful and college isn't relaly that important
things started to change
That is scare for a teenager like me
its even scarier for me as a college student
I have 4 years left till I have to jump to a hellish job market

The biggest thing make me worry is that when i finished my study i didn't have a direction to my life
thats what happened to me
I don't know what's to do
That really scare
you should enjoyu your life now
you never get to enjoy life like now after getting into college
In the future we'll probably teach the most fundamentally known, rather than the historical method
Like, momentum is some emergent property of standard model particles, we should teach that way, rather than; "this was obvious because we were trying to light each other on fire with trebuchets"
Modern schools all employ this historical hegemony that I think is badly informed.
Makes everything look disparate and unmemorable.
friedberg's linear algebra book just straight up proves one of the exercises with the hint lol
section 2.1, exercise 39
but it doesnt sit right with me how
you're asked to prove that there's a function that's additive but not linear
but then you use a result which states there exists a linear transformation of a certain kind
and then claims that the linear transformation is the function we want
what??????
and this is exercise 34
like what even is it trying to say, claiming a linear transformation exists and then saying it's not linear
how much of lag do u know
I know what vectors and matrices are and I can work a bit with vector operations and such
isn't this just saying a linear transformation is uniquely determined by how it transforms the basis vectors
I think so
mhm
oh you're supposed to look at the pic above that, that one is just reference
As said above, you can figure out what T does
if you know what T does to 'basis' vectors
I see
So sticking to R^n euclidean space
what is a basis vector
oh ok
ok? And this generalises to R^n
this is known as the standard basis for euclidean space
they're unit vectors
well this is just the standard choice
oh
what's orthogonal
perpendicular
oh ok
dot product of any pair = 0
yeah
mhm
I see
The special property of basis vectors is, any vector in your vector space can uniquely be written as a linear combination of the basis vectors
So let v = (4, 2, 3)
yes
ok
mhm
alright
So this generalises
So one handy result is
The matrix A
which represents a linear transformation
The columns of it are exactly
oh, huh. that is dodgy.
I see
glued together
yea it's confusing at the very least
This idea is for a matrix represented in the standard basis in R^3
But hmmm
T : R^n -> R^m
T(x) = Ax
A is m x n matrix
You can choose a basis for R^n (domain), and choose a basis for R^m (codomain)
And you can make your matrix A represented differently
oh
This is a bit hard to explain without explicit example 
lol
Like in a standard basis, the transformation might be a shear
a what
But viewed in other coordinates (basis), it might be a rotation
ohhhhh
huh
i think i kinda understand it? @karmic zealot
woaj
The red -> blue is a shear
woah
(this is a type of linear map for R^2 -> R^2)
oh I see
also there's a result earlier in the book, exercise 37, stating that for every pair of vector spaces over Q, if there is an additive function between the two spaces, the function must also be homogenous. and we have here a R as a vector space over Q. so that doesn't work out either!
so T is linear when multiplied by any rational
but it's NOT linear for all reals
you only use 34) to show that T is additive
In fact, there's a theorem which says any linear transformation can be made to look like a 'stretch'
oh it could be that
by choosing basis
ah
thank you!
This is related to eigenvectors
take that with a grain of salt tho i don't wanna mislead you
idk what those are
T(x) = kx
for k a scalar
You are looking for solutions to this equation
for both k, x
T a linear transformation
oh
k is known as the eigenvalue
The x which correspond to specific k are known as eigenvectors
oh interesting
And choosing the eigenvectors to be our basis is a smart choice (when possible)
Because then our transformation matrix will be 0's everywhere except the main diagonal
yea i think that 'c' term there isn't necessarily rational so it's just saying it's not linear over the reals. then it makes sense
why which
why will the main diagonal be nonzero
they can be 0
i guess that's why it's just a hint and not a full solution 
doesn't specify what fields the numbers belong to
The requirement is everything else is 0
but why can they be nonzero
alright lol
$A = BDB^{-1}$
mhm
ah so i was wrong to assume that it just straight up solved its own exercise lol
Now we say A is diagonalisable
If this is possible for some matrix B
cantor!
oh lol
To change basis in general, you can multiply a vector by the change of basis matrix
A change of basis can be viewed as a linear map on the basis vectors, basically
ah
Say we have our standard basis (1, 0) and (0, 1)
We might want our new basis to be (1, 1) and (-1, 1)
alright so we multiply by those basis vectors
oh
I think I've reached the limit if not passed it already of what can be handwaved 
shuri trying to teach LA in 10 minutes
sorry gmod, how much math do you know
in the least offensive way, i thought you probably knew lots of stuff because you've done talks in #events
nono ur good
gmod kinda smart ngl fr
I know calc 1 very well, calc 2 fairly well, and some calc 3
some set theory, some number theory
some topology
some real analysis
currently learning group theory
cool beans
hbu
uve been fooled 
gmod pretending to be phd
Dr gmod
lol
if uve seen generators for groups, then basis vectors for vector spaces are kinda like that (except they have stricter requirements)
The better analogy is
- generating set for group
- spanning set for vector space
Basis has the extra restriction that you can write every element uniquely
The underlying structure for a vector space is an abelian group (under the addition operation of the vector space)
On top of this a scalar multiplication is defined
But hmmm that analogy has its limits (spanning set for vector space is rarely a generating set for the underlying additive group)
I see
i am a small child and this is all self-studied so how much i "know" it is up for debate:
calc 1 and 2 im good i think
lin alg up to eigenvectors pretty much
calc 3 up to triple integrals
very little analysis i started reading rudin
a bit of number theory (richard borcherds has some banging lectures on yt)
and a tiny bit of group theory started reading artin
i think that's it 
oh ok that's similar to me
and naturally i know random things from wikipedia.
same lol
and random things from this discord as well, i suppose
oh wow same
i also know only a tiny bit of math
wheel algebras @ allyc 
wikipedia binges are a common affliction
because it's evil
true
i dont like it because it makes me sound like i actually know more than i do
and i don't wanna be a pretentious fuck, not even unintentionally
guys I found a desert temple
eh, nothing wrong with indulging in curiosity.
though i do see where you're coming from
you what?
lol
the understanding you get from studying a textbook is defo worlds apart from reading wikipedia
i'd like to think i am aware of my own ignorance, but i suppose that's not for me to judge lol
wise words
but sometimes i go on wikipedia just to get a better idea of things
it can be helpful especially because it's not written like a textbook
yeah. it's especially good for checking definitions of various things when you want a refresher
1000 times easier than finding the correct textbook page
like not using concepts yet unintroduced to the reader
and sometimes i get to see things ahead and from a different angle i guess
yep
also (somewhat) good for trying to make sense of the conversations in #discussion 
true
almost like learnig a language as a child
we're switching channels often lol
you know how people talk about mathematical maturity?
i feel like a mathematical infant the majority of the time tbh
i feel like a mathematical crawler
a large vocabulary (for my age), so to speak, from various sources but little fluency
true
the edit lmao
yea
i realised i dont know math
i can derive theorems in a textbook from definitions and axioms, that's about it. not so confident about my (nonexistent) ability to actually problem-solve though
This is a natural feeling to have
Out of undergrad I felt like I had been exposed to many things but understood very little
After grad school I felt like I was starting to understand stuff better, after seeing things again for the second, third, fourth time
And now years after that, I'm only starting to feel "oh hey I might be really fluent with some of this"
after grad school
so what you're telling me is i have about 10 years left till i feel somewhat confident in maths
oh wow such a point exists??
Math is only worthwhile because it is about difficult concepts. If it were that easy to understand then it likely wouldn't be nearly as powerful
thank you oh wise mip chunk
Also I sometimes still have dreams about not figuring out some math problem on an exam, even though I haven't been in school in a long time...
So I think that anxiety is still inside me
what are you doing now?
i still dream about failing an exam even though i've been out of school for at least half a decade
I'm a mathematician, though I do applied work for industrial purposes
cool beans
:o
wait what are you doing now 
waiting until i move out and go back to university some place else, maybe abroad
dropped out of physics because of mental health, decided to go back but covid hit, things came to a halt, and then some pretty big political stuff happened and uni still isnt operating again. has been that way for nearly 2 years now
oof
and in that mean time, i thought hey math is kinda nice so i guess i'll do math instead
that sounds pretty rough for you but it's nice that you've found something to do
i'm glad i found something to do as well
Does anyone know what a bridge program is ? https://math.virginia.edu/graduate/bridge/
Seems like its very similar in spirt to a TCC been looking into doing a bridge program before doing anything else
Between undergrad and grad school usually
ahh kk makes sense I was talking to one of the graduate students and he recommended that I should do a bridge program get a wide mathematical background then go fro mthere
He mentioned that american undergrads don't get the chance to "seeee" everything or get a taste of what would be considered a wide range of math
I think it's otherwise called a postbacc
Yeah cause some people are not prepared for grad school right out of undergrad, or they took a break from school and need something to catch up b4 grad school idk
but also some bridge programs have guaranteed admission to the phd program
if you do well enough
Anyone have any tips they'd like to share regarding REU applications?
Just apply and have an open mind maybe try doing something applied to get an idea of the kind of things that are going on that involve math but are outside of math
Do you know the history of bridge programs btw they seem like a recent thing in the US. Upon talking to that grad student I mentioned that was the first time hearing about them
no, I think they're pretty rare
I was looking at the upenn one when I was doing grad apps 3 years ago
I was told there good if you have a low overall gpa but a good math/technical background
But i'm considering the postbacc espcially at places like UoW where get exposed to a wide array of math
This might be helpful: https://mathoverflow.net/questions/17209/consequences-of-the-riemann-hypothesis
there's a really impressive number of crank replies here 
The comments on the question?
yeah
Some of them seemed to be really weird even to me, yeah
Riemann Hypothesis is the discrete version of Calabi-Yau theorem as solution of Ricci flat metric. You need to define suitable discrete Ricci curvature as Infinite sum of Riemann series. Then You need to develope discrete monge Ampère Equation. This must be the method for solving Riemann Hypothesis.
lol, lmao
Hahaha
Yes, this is the one I found odd
I wouldn't have discarded it until I read the last line
Speaking of which is there any cs equivalent of the Riemann Hypothesis ?
well, "cs-equivalent of the Riemann hypothesis" is a very vague phrase but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Prize_Problems?wprov=sfla1
The Millennium Prize Problems are seven well-known mathematical problems selected by the Clay Mathematics Institute in 2000. The Clay Institute has pledged a US$1 million prize for the correct solution of any of the problems.
To date, the only Millennium Prize problem to have been solved is the Poincaré conjecture. The Clay Institute awarded the...
Aren't there some primality tests that depend on the truth of the Riemann hypothesis?
is it just me or is strang's linear algebra course kinda... useless
it barely covers the theory about abstract vector spaces which made me overconfident when trying to study quantum mechanics
the concepts he emphasises i feel can be learnt in a few page long summary
yeah but i didn't know that beforehand lol
they cover more theory

eh, its alright
no harm has been done
but even for a computation based text
there's no way engineering or CS students can't handle slightly more theoretical linalg
strang is really slow paced and I've never had any linear algebra background
Oof
Strang's la,(both book and course) is for people who just want to rush through Linear algebra
It isn't supposed to teach people Linear Algebra but how to apply the algorithms that are useful in applied math
It's supposed to be "beginner friendly"
But it doesn't teach you anything like how to think or solve problems that aren't already solved
Proof that a linearly independent set of vectors cannot have more than dimV vectors in it
Suppose dimV = n, then a basis for V looks something like v1,v2,…,vn and any vector v in V can be uniquely represented as v = a1v1+a2v2+…+anvn for some coefficients ak. Suppose we have a system of n+1 vectors a1v1+…anvn+a_{n+1}v_{n+1} for some v1,…,v_{n+1} in V. then v_{n+1} can be represented uniquely as b1v1+b2v2+…+bnvn for some coefficients bk. therefore the system a1v1+…anvn+a_{n+1}v_{n+1} is linearly dependent.
short proof i randomly thought of
could someone tell me if this proof works?
yes i know the “uniquely represented” part was probably unnecessary lol
you use the same variables for a basis and for your set of n+1 vectors?
oops
Proof that a linearly independent set of vectors cannot have more than dimV vectors in it
Suppose dimV = n, then a basis for V looks something like v1,v2,…,vn and any vector v in V can be uniquely represented as v = a1v1+a2v2+…+anvn for some coefficients ak. Suppose we have a system of n+1 vectors b1v1+…bnvn+b_{n+1}v_{n+1} for some v1,…,v_{n+1} in V and coefficients bk. then v_{n+1} can be represented uniquely as c1v1+c2v2+…+cnvn for some coefficients ck. therefore the system b1v1+…bnvn+b_{n+1}v_{n+1} is linearly dependent.
shoot
@surreal sapphire how about now
many letters
did you change anything lmao
my issue was you fix a basis {v_1, ..., v_n} and then you seem to choose arbitrary vectors v_1, ..., v_{n+1}
i added another vector into the system to show that the new system can’t possibly be linearly independent
nice
the wording is a bit odd
well i just typed it to get it out of my head and on paper really, didn’t think about the wording much
im not exactly sure what you mean by "system of n+1 vectors b1v1+...b1vn+b_(n+1)v_(n+1)"
v1,…,vn are the same vectors from before, v_{n+1} is a new vector
.
that’s about all i can say
then what youre showing is that adjoining a vector to a basis makes it a linearly dependent set
it doesnt make a statement about any arbitrary system of n+1 vectors
ok never mind then
which is what i believe you want to start from
i tried
its ok
ye, you can fix this with some words though
like what
if they are already linear dependent, there is nothing to do, otherwise n of them are linearly independent thus form a basis ...
the thing is
the word basis already implies this right
i guess so
so you show this when showing that dimension makes sense
could i edit it a bit and resend in a minute
you have to show that finitely generated vector spaces have minimal generating sets of same cardinality
ok that’s a lot of fancy words for me to digest if i gotta be honest
and then you show that if one of them satisfies a linear relation in the others, you can reduce the size of the generating set
this is what you did
ye, the wording becomes the main issue 😛
because if you say dimension n, you are already saying that any set of n+1 vectors must be linearly dependent
eh, kinda
at least if you think that a vector space cant have dimension n and n+1 at the same time
ok never mind i thought i had something but i didn’t lol
If you guys write big articles in Latex, is it normal to have many warnings? Do you ignore them sometimes?
i get warnings all the time in overleaf but i mostly ignore them
if it’s something big it would be noticeable without the warning anyways
If I make two line breaks with \ I get a underfull hbox badness 10000 warning. The warning is so pointless for me....
yeah same
i deal with my warnings
i do not 
you shouldnt use \\ to break lines
whatelse?

press return twice?
There is this "Einschub". Are you okay with that?
you can do \smallskip \medskip \bigskip for skipping
or adjust \parskip
\\ is only to be used in special environments (where it is fine)
additionally you can adjust the warnings themselves
if you have overfull hboxes a lot but you think they are fine
you can adjust the badness level or something
is 3.6 gpa good
depends on univeristy/courses you've taken
it looked interesting to me
i didnt try it
I think that the textbook covers most out of all undergraduate analysis textbooks
but i would probably do it for multivariate analysis
are the exercises in ladr known to be hard? i feel like i’ve heard that they are
tbh i didn't find it that challenging
tho i've only done some chapters
maybe cuz i did it for review tho
people do say that
and also no determinants
so bad book

i'd recommend another book though
theres no need to put in too much effort for linear algebra
this lol
i don't meen that you should rush over it tho
also this
I think that spending a semester for theorems and a month for applications like svd is best
singular value decomposition
i can’t tell if i’m not trying hard enough or if this book just doesn’t explain stuff well

@rotund steppe sadcat
which book?
ladw
i don't recommend ladw tbh
just go for friedberg
especially if you are learning the subject for first time
i’m this far and i don’t feel like switching
everything before diagonalization has been explained decently well
i’m gonna stay with it
then you can skip those parts in friedberg
when you graph a complex number are you supposed to graph the point or the vector
depends on the weather
Don’t graph either
whats the difference
out of curiosity
I have a question about finite state transducers and regular expressions encoding. Which channel would fit better to ask it?
thanks!
so say i wanted to go to college in europe, as an american student in the IB program
how would i go abt it?
just like
apply?
first of all good luck finding a bachelor degree offered in english
fuck me i forgot abt other languages
hmmm
i'm taking german in school and am like
conversational
barely
hmm
I wish i could take Japanese
american moment
i'm bilingual i swear
Ja, natürlich

I know igbo. Tho not sure if people know that language.
cringe
quantum, I don’t know why but a quick glance at your pfp looks like someone’s face is melting off(maybe stretched out).

,av
Oh yeah I can see how the hair looks like melting skin at a distance

I'm aware of P vs NP of course
why would people say "a new phenomena" instead of "a new phenomenon"?
does it has meanings
since I have seen so many people say in this way
I mean, there's always the UK, right? Applying to the UK is really easy. There's just 1 single application and essay that is sent to all your choices via UCAS. IB is very recognised and shouldn't be an issue at all. Not sure about other parts of Europe.
i hear cambridge is good
although i'm probably too poor and have too shit grades to get there
Cambridge is very good lol
Although yeah super pricey without a scholarship
Imperial/UCL are also decent
Although again very pricey
i also rly wanna go to nyu except i hate nyc
Lmao
Cambridge is one of top unis in the world for math, I think. Their entrance exam is also really damn hard.
And yeah, super duper expensive because the pound is too damn strong. 
So the entrants get multi variable calculus?
No. The content isn't the hard part. It's the difficulty of the problem.
They only assume high school math, but they set university-style questions.
It you're curious, just go look up STEP past exam papers.
Alright
But first, I’ll have to finish my studies for this semester if I want to go beyond trig and probability
If someone can help with geometry proofs real quick can you dm me it shouldn’t take long
did anyone actually dm u?
Nope.
lol
You're probably more likely to get help by posting the question in one of the help channels than asking for people to DM you.
I'd like to think most people (including myself) keep their DMs only to talk with friends.
how do u know
because in dms, people get gross and touchy
and are like can u do exam for me
or dm u at 1am asking for homework help
no one wants to become your dedicated answer generator
Any tips on how to re-learn Euclidian geometry? I can't make any sense out of what I was taught; especially the relationship of angles between different vertices
Exactly. When people DM you, they expect you to respond with an answer. When it's in the server, you can choose to respond. It's far less imposing.
That's why I've learnt just to keep DMs closed for any educational servers. 😂
isnt that every uk uni - the pricey part
Yeah it prolly is
any? i am only in educational servers
Fair enough. I'm mostly in educational servers and servers for games I play.
Applying g to Australia is easier
U don’t need a essay
The person was asking about European universities.
Can't say I've tried applying to Australia. I don't think they have that many prestigious universities compared to the US and UK.
uk obviously have oxbrdige but australia ione of the easiest unis tog et to
Australia unis are ok, but certainly not on the same level as the best of UK/USA
They’re a lot easier to get into indeed
how about canadian ones
oh okay
I mean, it depends on personal preference obviously, but I don't think being easy to get into is necessarily a good thing.
Top universities are hard to get into for good reason.
which uni did u go to
I go UNSW
its hard to get a 4.0 in australia
a lot of assessments
is 20 class test
20 class test
60 final
I'm from UNSW the courses there are hard as u could tell with our assessments
i want to apply for grad school
we dont get much opporutnity to write
publications as well only have honours project
Uni here in Italy is so cheap
Uni here in Singapore is $9000 per year for citizens. 
oh
thats pretty brutal
do they offer loans or scholarship to compensate for that?
There's quite a few scholarships you can apply for.
I think universities here are fairly generous with giving out scholarships.
hmm
so does anyone know of any good math extracurriculars colleges would like that aren't competition math things?
maybe research project?
Perhaps tutoring?
I pay 200euro per 6 months in Germany.
it isnt math but how the heck do you determine which hemisphere is which is this image
theyre labelled?
i assumed the line was the axial tilt
it is
not the hemisphere divider
thanks namin
#❓how-to-get-help tells you not to do this
wow only 30 mins
yeah thats a long time
they also managed to wait half a day without pinging random ppl like four times
impressive, innit?
I've once waited for days for an answer lmfao
those are rooky numbers
Dude i am so sorry
I didnt keep the tab open becuasw i went outside
Do you still need helpm
get back inside 😡
Can anyone help me with a 2 geometry problems quickly.
what grade level
9th
no im fine
Why is the help system not working I put in a request and wait 3hours and then I get timed out and no one replies
Find out what attracts people to reply.
It's working perfect fine. It just depends if people want to help. High quality questions tend to attract more help. Tell people what you tried and where exactly where you're stuck.
help other ppl help you
have a good question, tell people what you've already done or tried
etc
Also I'd help, but geometry is beyond me. 
Ok it just that I asked my cousin who did special maths in school and he couldn't help so I thought some one here could help
i can't really help as my math skills are only grade 9 and 10 so i won't be able to help as a lot of the questiosn are on complex topics
that's not what i mean
what did you mean then
help other ppl help you means like
be specific about your question
make your intention clear
ok
i mean "provide as much information about your question as you can, so other people can help you better"
tell them as much information as possible that's related to your question
make it easier for them, basically
yeah thanks i worte everything i could think of
If you still don't get help, it could also mean that people don't know how to do the problem either. Maybe you can try posting in the more specific channels, like #geometry-and-trigonometry since I think people better at those topics tend to browse it more.
ok thats good advice i will try that
why is epsilon of all symbols is used to mean infinitesimal?
whats so significant about the letter epsilon itself?
they use epsilon for error and delta for distance in some sense
but the letter itself is not important at all, you could use any other if you wanted
it's just standard practice
ah that makes sense
just like how pi is chosen for what it is bcs it comes from the greek "perimetros"
i can't comment on that
You can swap the delta and epsilon if you want
It’s not recommended, but you can if you want
Oh wait I guess you’re moreso asking about perhaps the meaning behind the letter “epsilon” or something similr, in which case I’m not qualified either
What exactly is multiplication if the two numbers are real numbers?
Its easy to see that multiplication is adding a number integer amount of times
unique continuous extension of rational muliplication
What is meant by unique
its just the multiplication derivied from how reals are made with rationals
unique because there is only one way to do it
you can think of multiplication as a function
Q x Q -> Q
on the rationals
you can extend this function’s domain and codomain in a unique way such that it equals rational multiplication on rational numbers
so if f:Q x Q -> Q is rational multiplication
we can say g: R x R -> R is the unique extension of this multiplication
and g(Q x Q)= f
Unique continuous extension
also for a useful notion
you can think of a change of basis
so how intger multiplication is repeated addition
you can think of rational multiplication in a similar way
so if you have a/b * c/d
it can be repeated addition of a/b , c*d times
but its not actually
because clearly that gives you the wrong numbers
so instead you can think of doing a coordinate transformation on one side of the input
and scale up by a denominator
and then the notion of repeated addition of a fraction still makes sense
alternatively you can just make this simpler and think of a/bd added c times
when this comes to real numbers you can convert multiplication by two reals into repeated addition if you want but its not very helpful for thinking about multiplication
its better to think in terms of areas
If you construct reals using Dedekind cuts then you don't need to invoke any sort of continuity to define multiplication (though of course it ends up being the same thing)
bUt WhaT aBout rEaL ARithmeTic!!
yOu maDe thE reAls but YoU haVen't dEfiNed thE arIthMetic!
wHATZ e + π!!!!!!
what they doin for dq today?
What is the motivation behind the development of polynumbers?
what is a polynumber
@bright condor Sorry for the ping as I cant reply in the channel anymore
Dw, Im aware that my answer for number 1 is incorrect cause the correct answer wasn't in the choices soo I picked the one that's the closest~ I'll also approach my teacher regarding this. Thanks again 
