#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 473 of 1
i went back in time to pin what i deemed the first pin-worthy message in the channel
lmo
chmonkey daddy?
lingmao
no...

does anyone here know about edgenuity, anyone ever taken it before for a school class?
edd be looking hot today

sus
#the-teapot when?
#the-sus-vent
questions0
feel free to go vent there
#「the-sicilian-bull」
I found it, somehow....
fits the aesthetic i think

venting channel is #『staff-summaries』
which field of maths studies elliptic curves?
all of them 
Complex geometry too
so several different related fields of math study it?
nice
You're back in the server 
ya!! 
welcome back
nah
because i saw you've been here even before i was here
lol
which sounds like you're technically emeritus
ahhh ye but i think the emeritus role is for the people that were here even before i was here 
and i think its also under the condition that i had like an active role?
emeritus is just (had very active at one point) I think
but then didnt?
o right very active
i had the active role but not very active
when woog first had us guess the role 
but then life happened 
no it's purely history based
you can have emeritus w/o ever having had at least active
rokabe!!!!
when is game night 
also i thought honorable was for non-straight people
how come everyone has honorable role now
everyone is non-straight now
idk whenever ppl are free & join vc, it's usually unplanned
also what
i thought i remember
that once upon a very long time ago
that angetenar negotiated for honorable role cus he was gay >_>
so i was like
ok

honorable -> non straight people
ange pushed for me to become honorable (honorary gay) and that was the end of it.

ppl get honorable by mod consensus/ivory nomination, that's all
i have a sequence (xn) defined by |Xn+2 - Xn+1 | < or = to C|Xn+1 - Xn| where C in (0, 1). Am I right in assuming the way to start this is to first show the sequence defined by (Xn - Xn-1) is cauchy?
Sorry I have to show the original sequence is cauchy
ryc still coping about sexuality i see
This would be better asked in #advanced-analysis
Back at it again with the (apparently stupid) channel suggestions. But would an #Advanced-questions channel for very general questions in advanced topics be useful?
I’m gonna doxx myself here but sometimes it’s hard to know exactly what channel an advanced question should go in if it’s too basic to feel included in a particular subject but feels too advanced for a questions channel.
I think it's safe to go for an advanced channel, like an intro analysis question would be much more likely answered in #advanced-analysis than in a general question channel. If it really doesn't belong there, you'd be pointed to a more appropriate channel.
@devout nacelle the period in your name is very passive aggressive.
I see. 
.
.
.
.
where is catmando
I literally just learned about the capital of nepal
shook my world
any mathers in chat
.
Nvm then
I just never heard marks much until I talked to some people from Canada.
And the use of washroom instead of bathroom
But the masks thing I guess is probably a class by class thing
yeah bc on my last exam, i had to find horizontal asymptotes of a piecewise function and so i took the limits to infinity and negative of both of the pieces to the function. i took the limits incorrectly, so obviously that’s wrong, but i clearly showed that i know what a horizontal asymptote is and how to get it
for this, i got ZERO points. i could’ve just left the question blank or drawn a picture of a dog and gotten the same thing. if the point of marks is to rate my understanding on a scale of 0-10 in this case, and i showed i know what it is and how to do it (just used the wrong numbers) how is that equivalent to ZERO
they do
Was it an open ended question
but prof isn’t the one who grades the exam
like for a diff question i didn’t rlly know what i was doing so i wrote some relevant formulas and plugged in what i could
Or was it like idk multiple choice or select answer after you did all that work
not multiple choice, just blank you fill and then circle answer
yeah idk. i just don’t like how my biggest worry in college so far is which grader i’m going to get
Hard to say without seeing question and exactly what you put
i appreciate the sympathy brother
i might have a pic
here hold on
here
part b
is worth 5 points
top portion i only found 1/2 of the limits correctly, so i get 1/5 points
……🤔
Horizonal asymptotes is just end behavior where y goes as x gets very large In either direction (+ or -)I believe.
I don't think you were suppose to check it for both parts of the function when like how you did +inf for both parts and -inf for both parts
Which might be why it was scored how it was
If I recall that is how you get your horizontal asymptotes
And given it was a piece wise you still only should have had 2 limits being tested and not 4
Just for the 2 directions of x
Is that why there is a big slash over the last limit?
not sure. we went over the problem in recitation
and she set it up the same exact way i did
i just evaluated them incorrectly
So you tested 4 limits?
yes
Do you have work of that
Seems weird that that would be done
but when i got the reply from the grader they told me that “ I would not give him any point just because he knows he should compute a infinite limit.”
well thanks for running thru it w me at least
Guess some grades can be like that. I don't know if maybe the prof has a rubric of what they exactly expected
And what warrants a 5/5 vs 1/5 etc
Sometimes it is just like that :/
yeah, kinda sucks haha but like i said thanks
this exam i think i did ok i understood everything (except 1 question) but i made lots of small errors
how do i graph arg(z) stuff
leading me to get a wrong final answer, but the right process
gen x is so little stereotyped that in jokes about generational differences, gen x-ers just end up sounding like normal human beings
Anyone wanna see a funny video lol
no
TTerra hates funny
that explains everything
that explains nothing since everything is nothing
yes!
ye, i can tell they are different words
no
no
no
no
no
shhh. dont listen to manan

LMAOOO

?
yeah
why so serious sad ryc
shhhh shyshu

and do not speak of this any longer
yeah

its best not to
everything is ok of course. just a silly situation.

ye ye
i see
a slip of the mouth a bit of a mishap all at the wrong time & place
lol
Hey, what are you up to people?
i am desperately trying to remove lines from this research proposal
so that i can submit this application
it is now 14 lines above 2 pages
it used to be like 25
getting there
it's just very frustrating to do this

what's it like doing a PhD in maths?
and what do you research?
are there any specific examples of privacy violations doing good for society 
after a week of dry theory and attempts of understanding abstract LA im reaching that "oh its clicking now lets fking go" stage
im desperately trying to remove lines from my life
I'm desperately trying to find a way to stop procrastinating
Nicee, it gets easier after it 'clicks'.
Or the next page in general.
but ryc u can maybe look thru and see if u can find more concise ways of saying something
👌
honestly yeah the first step is always the hardest
but i think procrastination also stems from your lack of confidence that you can get it done
tbh i procrastinate when the motivation to do something isnt there
if there is a reason i need to get it done then i cant procrastinate
but my df brain finds reasons to make the work less imp
just procrastinate on procrastinating 4head
i usually just raise the stakes to myself like "its either that annoying task or the constant feeling of regret" raise the regret feeling enough and its better to do the task than not to
yeah just put on your good calendar the due date like 3 days beforehand
so u panick
3 days beforehand
and then finish it
:^)
like for instance, i have an exam on monday
i have no motivation to study rn coz ik tht subject has little to no implications in my life
and i cud just cheat my way through
gotta do what you gotta do
damn
you con convince yourself its fun
me in my ML class
"man im telling you discrete math and graphs are actually fun"
Nope nvm doesnt work
i am almost done with my first pass doing this. i'll probably have to do another pass
which is ok
at least so far i haven't had to remove a big section
Tfw you wait for the 'round hour' to start studying but you procrastinated for a minute too long and you have to wait for the next round hour to start
.
if its something i like its fun
i've just started so i'm still taking classes and meeting people. i don't have an advisor yet or anything
convincing myself and others that its fun
i'll be taking classes for another year or so, basically the first two years are the "masters phase" of the program (even though it's just one 5 year phd program)
:o gl!!
so you do actual research after taking classes and writing exams?
2 years master then phd
in america in math that's very common
but it's not the only way it's done
in europe and in other places it's usually split
ye there's tons of stuff
yeah, well you start doing some actual research beforehand too
well ye cause you might just want the masters you know
oh nice
like we have options to do accelerated masters
i've just been working on finishing up a lot of undergraduate research
what are you doing your PhD on?
and take grad school classes in undergrad
so i haven't started anything new yet
like what specifically?
i think music theory not sure
pure maths
analysis and pdes according to about

partial differential equations and dynamical systems, most likely in fluid dynamics. i'm really interested in the phenomenon of turbulence cascades, which is when you see big spirals in fluids break up into smaller ones, and then smaller and smaller and so on until they create turbulence at tiny scales.
the equations that describe this are big and nasty but they are very interesting from a math theory perspective!
oh wow that sounds super interesting, so would you be working with the navier stokes?
yeah
basically fluid mech but on steroids
sure, super theoretical fluid mechanics
lol I swear euler's worked on literally every field of maths, you see his name everywhere
yeah he was smart
here is one of the equations i had to type up on the lecture notes i'm currently writing for this subject:
lol
that's all 1 integral on the right
over like
damn that looks awesome
+2 ?? two time dimesions? lol what?
i mean if you know what all the pieces mean it makes sense
oh whoops d is not the dimension
looks the the dimensions are separable for the most part tho
omega is a function of p

so only if you can use some independence on the product under the expectation
yea
(which you can, in particular cases, and then the challenge is showing that the other cases are small)
but yeah, this is the general idea

vector arrows are so ugly when you don't handwrite them
what are vector arrows
$\vec{A}$
ryc. (#talks Oct 23)
how is this ugly
Shyshu of the Golden Water ✓


yeah it;s off center and when you have primes and shit too it looks gross
$\widearrow{A}$
Shyshu of the Golden Water ✓
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
widehat is basically necessary
sadge
opencry
ryc. (#talks Oct 23)
which do you prefer I kinda like the first one more 
but yeah bold is best
no clutter
,
alrighty then, when is better?
ryc. (#talks Oct 23)
the RHS is considerably cursed

swifteeee
that's why you use bold, anyway
^that is hella clumsy
how do you emulate bold on blackboard or paper though
you darken the shit out of your letters until it rips through the paper
you draw a fuckton of squiggly lines
at this uni they like using ~ for matrices, _ for vectors, double ~~ for multilinear maps

or better yet, just einstein notation
triangulating your location further based on notational quirks
another one is denoting fourier transform pairs like this
exaggerated cuz track pad
🗒️
f^ is the Fourier transform
uhhh idk I would use the first when I don’t have to superscript other stuff
second is the best
which do you prefer, $$\prod_{n=1}^N a_n = a_1 \cdot a_2 \cdot ,, \dots ,, \cdot a_N$$ or $$\bullet_{n=1}^N a_n = a_1 \cdot a_2 \cdot ,, \dots ,, \cdot a_N$$?
😌
Second one isn't true right?
so is there that same notation but with a + sign instead of a dot? (regarding the bottom one)
$$\plus{n=1}^N a_n = a_1 \cdot a_2 \cdot ,, \dots ,, \cdot a_N$$
😦
I assume it's a dot product , and you can't take dot product between a scalar and a vector
i made it up
I mean i guess the 2nd one can work
and cdot need not be a dot product, it would only make sense if it's scalar mult
sure, it would be valid
just kinda cursed
imagine writing that on paper
just go HAM with a marker to draw the symbol
idk it feels kinda quicker perhaps superior 

$\prod_{k=1}^n a_k = a_1 \coprod \cdots \coprod a_n$
ryc. (#talks Oct 23)
multiplication is just a special case of dot product 
yuh
When I write lots of dots everywhere. I just mean multiply all the things in whatever way you can
After all scalar multiplication commutes with dot product in each component
ryc when he tries multiplying two sentences together
a sentence is something that transforms like a sentence
Are the sentences elements of a vector space though?
$\goodtimes$
Edd
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
inshallah brother

omg
ryc. (#talks Oct 23)


let $\boldsymbol{v} \in \bigtimes_{n=1}^N \mathbb{R}$
Edd
bigchungus
it happens
A very old sink
oof
let $\boldsymbol{v} \in \bigtimes_{n=1}^N \mathbb{R}$
Venti
so smort me

ccate
caat
create
do all math books like to tease out certain ideas before defining them
or is that just an oldschool books thing
Honestly that seems to just depend more on the author's style.
Sometimes a book will hint at an idea then define it, other times it will define an idea then provide motivation and examples, other times it will define something and not provide any motivation or examples at all. (Option 3 is very rare, in my experience).
Motivate a definition so you don't just get smacked with a paragraph of what a partition of unity is.
Yeah i agree i would say for a completely unprepared reader, some definitions are going to be impossible to parse unless you give examples ahead of time
hartshorne's definition of a sheaf hit me like a truck
john82625
Hey if I went through it that must mean it's ok, I mean I survived
hey all, random question because i am an undergrad thinking of going to grad school in math - what exactly are the benefits of going into a higher-ranked math program? i get that in other subjects some schools have much more equipment, but does that apply to math too?
If you want to be an academic mathematician it will help you find a better post-doc
if you want to work in industry it will help you network at better companies
so it’s largely about the prestige then?
You guys know any good free math courses for someone who is transitioning to uni maths from A-Level maths
interesting, ty for the answers!
Even books would be helpful
could you elaborate what you mean by this? is it bc the profs you’ll be working with will be “better” for lack of a better word or what?
I think so
Wrong place to ask?
Consider MIT OpenCourseWare's courses.
Specifically the calculus/multivariable/linear algebra ones.
i will add that it's not just "prestige." it's about connections and networking. if you go to a big name school and all you get out of it is a big name, but you don't know anyone, then you're not going to have a good time with continuing in academia. on the other hand, if you make good connections with advisors and other people in the research field, then you're in very good shape. this is facilitated massively at a high ranking program which has faculty that are the top of their fields, has the clout to invite profs from other unis for seminar talks, etc.
also higher ranked programs are probably more likely to pay you more.
thank you so much for the in-depth answer!!
that totally makes sense
you mention seminar talks - is it a good idea to try and network with ppl that talk at your school? my college is having a speaker on geometric group theory and it seems really interesting
and i go to a tiny college so it'll probs be a small lecture
i mean you don't have to at first definitely
that comes more later on when you have like
meaningful questions to ask and stuff
lol
good point lolol
im gonna go to the lecture anyway it seems interesting and i have the suggested background
maybe I'll have qs i can ask my groups prof or the speaker
also higher ranked programs are probably more likely to pay you more.
except UC system schools
if you get a medical condition at a uc system school you're literally going to die
because you wont be abble to afford shit
are there any good examples of mass surveillance being used to find national or international criminals from very little information? i want to use in my speech before presenting why we should be concerned
not about criminals but Target's advertising data-crunching algos realized a woman was pregnant and started marketing pregnancy materials to her before she did
yes but my speech is on government surveillance
very hard to connect the ideas
also its not that target knew before she did, its that target knew before her dad did
its surprisingly hard to find the type of story im looking for...
I heard about this, so crazy how we made those programs lol
or maybe we are talking about different stories?
@vivid halo ready for Sp_4?
Ah, automorphisms of a vector space equipped with a nondegenerate alternating bilinear form
So let's say we're over R, what's the Lie algebra?
Or first off is it even a manifold?
Well
as long as the dependence on M is not degenerate (inverse function theorem)
Oh shit, Sloth is going to start talking about symplectic forms and the symplectic group 
symplectic boogalo
Sloth King Daminark
One can conclude it's a Lie group by the closed subgroup theorem
That takes care of the manifold question
Yeah and this computation tells us what the Lie algebra is
I guess the direct way to conclude it's a manifold is to say that f should land in skew-symmetric matrices
And say something something regular value theorem
I had to prove this and compute its lie algebra on my first symp geo hw assignment 
I also had to prove it is not compact
Fun fun fun
Yeah, it is a fun question
You can prove it is a manifold by just applying the regular level set theorem/preimage of regular values theorem
I just used the fact that $M^T\Omega M=\Omega$ is a collection of polynomial equations in the coefficients of $M$, which makes the corresponding subset closed in the Zariski topology, therefore also closed in the Euclidean topology
Icy001
I mean
That shouldn't be the difficult part
Matrix multiplication is polynomials
Yeah
As is inversion
Just that the closed subgroup theorem is a way more direct way to very Sp(2n) is a lie group.
So operations are just "polynomials restricted to a submanifold"
But like, this feels almost as too damn overpowered lol.
You don't need this.
It nicely explains why every matrix group sitting inside GL_n you have ever seen happens to be a Lie group
I haven't actually written out the proof of closed subgroup theorem which is why I'm using regular value theorem. Also this gives me the dimension
I guess I should elaborate a bit on this argument
So
Along the lines of the earlier computation
Hmm
Okay so
Sloth King Daminark
Sloth King Daminark
Sloth King Daminark
Sloth King Daminark
Sloth King Daminark
Dami mathing away to the empty void
lie theory
like lie algebra and lie groups and all that?
Sloth King Daminark
symplectic geometry aka the study of a kind of 2 form
Ugh it's late and I'm tired maybe tomorrow I'll continue
Tomorrow I think the plan is to understand the Killing form on sp(2n), or at least sp(4)
a very useful 2-form
And maybe a Cartan decomp, think about Iwasawa
Iwasawa 😄
"a very useful 2-form" cries the symplectic geometer as their life's work gets reduced to what it is, an antisymmetric (0,2)-tensor, aka basically a matrix


This stuff is really good
Herb Gross is a beast
It's great. Gilbert Strang's linear algebra lectures are top tier

hi
locked chat moment
wym
wtf they can ping the instant frame they join the server?
👀
lmao @ namington telling me to check my pings if i randomly got pinned (he noticed)
dyno is dogshit
just in general
hm
yeah theres literally no way to stop this
we can slow it down
to catch it earlier
but theres no way to preemptively stop mass pings
if discord had a mass ping disabling toggle, thatd help a lot
I know some other servers have verification stages
as in manual verification
before a user is let in
some of our target audience literally cannot go through that process for some reason or another
have verification to allow pinging individual users?
discord phone verification doesnt work in the prc for example
hm
people's republic of china?
how old are the accounts joining and mass-pinging?
hope the spam bots get banned from discord
hm
since theyre real compromised accounts
Yeah I see
thats another reason phone verification wont fully stop it
bots? If user is spamming pings immediately mute them? though the mods here are so active idk how much it would help
they already get banned right
no they're still lurking
ah
yeah you can ping literally as many members as you can fit in 1 discord message
which is typically like 100-200
in theory, if someone had like 1000 bots
they could ping literally everyone
and we'd have no way to stop em
okay 100-200 is an overestimate then
a mention is 21 characters
but its a lot
the only hard solution to this issue would be on discords end
like, similar to toggles that disable everyone pings
hold on is it possible that an invisible character at the start of your nickname sends you to the bottom of the list? then we could have a verification system to essentially protect you from pings
have a "disable mass pings" toggle
how about your idea with the weeb dude
if you ping >5 users in 1 message
you know the one
the ping doesnt go through
probably randomly picks users
people who don't care about being pinged would be the ones who end up being pinged
they do im pretty sure
ah
lol the bottomest online person right now is a person with no name
best mod
also is said person just randomly pinging people left and right?
I think there a couple nice bots that can prevent mass mentions
Ah
who raids a mathematics server
It just has many people
Doesnt matter what it is
Raiders just look for big servers
Thats it
so you said the math bot can now handle this case?
didn't get pinged
so it worked I think
by the way, can I get my og name for this server?
does the bot read through messages before they are sent through the server or is that not possible?
or can the bot only react to the messages
Idk how discord registers a ping but i assume you could count the number of @ ? unless there is a way to react the exact pings in a message
although what i suggest sounds a bit naive
most bots i know do that
i have it set to mute people when pinging > 5 people in some message and it works
yeah so there is no way to prevent it but just quickly remove it after it happens?
and then idk ban user or something
What happened to discission 1
seems it is under lockdown because of that bot spam or whateer
no this is a math server full of people who don't know algebra 1
yes, #❓how-to-get-help
oh well ok
hello sir
yeah it is!
my thing ended early i can go to the talk let’s gooo
wait why don't I have permission for discussions-1?
there was a raid n the staff want ppl to see the message
rather than having to @ everyon
Talk starting in 3 minutes!!!
hell ya
oh so I wasn't muted or anything
Yess.
talks about?
Dynamical Donuts.
i hope this talk isn’t interactive my voice is so fucked from my cold LOL
I mean you can use the chat lol.
Just joined math sorcerer abstract algebra course on udemy. Pretty awesome
anyone tried ?
NO
okay
That guy is famous lol.
YEAH, tried many abstract alg on youtube... But only this one I found helpful
atleast to me
but for calc I would definitely go for professor leonard
Lol there's a talk right now, where is the zoom link?
Is ryc’s talk still going on or did I miss it??
closed a minute ago
😔
Yes
I know the basics
I've only fully read the first chapter of Jacobson's book
Don't even know any module theory
nerd
I know 1 + 1 = 2
I know algebra 1
In fact I’m way beyond that. I’m taking calc i with analytic trig
calc i
Same. Im starting calc i suppose
I want to learn it
Its fun
calc i is roman calculus 1
so old theory
way of putting it
interesting
i know calc i too
although after quite some time
i find it very hard to differentiate what i learned in calc 1, 2, and 3
it just all mushes together?
dunno if anyone else relates 

imagine learning numbers in calculus
calc just presupposes the existence of the real numbers
an existence that is a LIE propagated by BIG ANALYSIS
blame tao
Euclid was a crank too.

I was an idiot and missed Ryc’s talk. Does anyone know if it was recorded anywhere?
they said they will record a version for youtube and post it
me too
Muchas gracias. Do you happen to know their YouTube account?
is this going overboard with toasting engineers in a research paper?
no reason
its a lame joke
in fact, all of the stuff you wrote there is trivial and could be removed
unless it's like a manual for high school/undergrad students
I as an engineer have never approximated π=3 or e=3
So where does this meme come from???
The approximations we make are mostly on the theoretical level (e.g. approximating circuit design and other design complications)
you'd never do that in circuits cuz you'd fuck up the signal phases, idk
it would make printed circuit boards useless 😛
I think it makes a lot more sense to approximate 3 as pi or as e than the other way around. sin(3) ~ sin(pi) = 0 so sin(3) is smol
sin e
I have estimated pi = sqrt(10) occasionally
when doing order of magnitude calculations
by which I really mean, log_10(pi) ~~ 1/2
.
<@&268886789983436800> parents intelligence shows transphobia
Uh????
What a garbage user for the 10 minutes they were here.
Talking about diarrhea attacking people and stuff.
they literally talked incoherent gibberish
😔 me when the moderators do their job and i dont get to see the shitshow
it was boring
just "lol i refer to someone by it because pronouns in profile lol! btw what's transphobia?"
what are the best options to sorta bridge your way from meh undergrad college to good grad school somewhere internationally
It's wrong. Over-approximating isn't a systematic error. Even if someone is bad at their job and over-approximates, the data may still be error-free and someone else could get good results.
Note that, as others have said, π = 3 is a meme and isn't actually done by any real engineers.
The other two are wrong as well. Note that "error" doesn't refer to "I couldn't do this well enough so the answer is wrong lolol" (Assume that you, yourself, are perfect) but instead refers to "This factor is impossible to finely control, and as such will result in inaccuracy in the data"
An error is systematic if you can always predict which way/how much the data will be off.
.
It sounds like you're doing chemistry. A common error is "transfer of reactant from one container to another".
You can't possibly get ALL out, no matter how much you try, and the end result will be less product. So, this is a systematic error.
I wonder if someone believes engineers take pi=3 as fact should be responded to seriously

Approximating pi as 3 is actually fairly useful if you just want to do rough approximations in your head.
I approximate 3 as pi 
Tbh I approx e as pi.
Based brotherford
Lmao
lmao
lmao
Oaml
can someone know
your phone number by
looking at your profile
Coldstein why do you repeatedly ask that question here?
wdym
the last time was
"can someone see my friends list"
They've def asked the phone one too.
man just wants to know 😔
Either way, why ask on a math server?
wonder whose blood is on his hands
Why not google it or go to a discord support forum.
coldstein is worried
In fact people have asked that exact question on the discordapp subreddit lol.
wonder if someone is blackmailing them or something
To be fair data leaks are spooky 👻
You can probably get your discord questions answered more reliably on this subreddit. Most of your q's have probably already been asked there, so you can probably even find answers without even having to post.
homogenization and dehomogenization in alg geo is making my brain hurt
Why? What is it?
trying to show that if you have an affine variety, homogenize it, then dehomogenize it, you end up with the same variety, and I can see at a high level why it's true, but proving it I keep getting wrapped up between homogeneous coordinates vs. affine coordinates
Ah that sounds way above my head. I do not know what an affine variety is.
basically the solution set to some system of polynomial equations
Oh gotcha.
So you homogenize the solution set rather than the set of equations itself?
yeah, and the homogenized solution set is defined in terms of the homogenized equations
Oh okay so like if f_i(x_i1,...,x_in) is one of your polynomials from your set is homogenizing the equation sort of like considering the solution set of equations f_i(Lx_i1,...,Lx_in)?
(I mean like scaling all the variables in ur equations by L)
to homogenize, you separate the terms based on their degree, then multiply by the extra coordinate so that they're all the same dgree
Weird, I was imagining in my head something more like that homogeneous property for functions.
Have you tried #algebraic-geometry
okay thank god I thought that channel had been there for a while and I was losing my mind
Can anyone share Springboard book PDF for class 8th ?
also we discourage piracy here
discourage is a strong word
impermissible
illegalize
verboten
both verboten and impermissible are adjectives
good one

CoolShot
It’s the cancel package






my states when studying chem 😵💫
\usepackage{cancel}
ty
Hey! Just a general question
How much math is one supposed to actually remember?
I really doubt that even an algebraic topologist would remember literally every result in algebraic topology
So how much is supposed to be good enough?
I think in practice, real mathematicians probably refer to books and literature a lot
how much ever you can 
The cofe
.
The cofe
.

Your name
ballsano weirstross

that is not true
seems youre assuming x^2 = 1 has only one solution
it has two: x = 1 and x = -1
maybe youre naively applying middle school formulae that only work for positive base
?
Is x^(2/6) equal to x^(1/3)? If you do legal math and simplify the exponents, it is the same. However, if you graph them, they are not the same. X^(2/6) will never be negative since you square it. X^(1/3) however can be negative. Therefore they are technically not equal.
Take x=-1 for example, they both give different answers
If they are equal, they should give the same answers
wherever that's from is wrong.
(-1)^(2/6) is the same as the 6th root of (-1)^2 correct?
but if we solve, we get the 6th root of 1 right?









)




