#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 446 of 1
yeah you like, take the inverse of varphi map
and remember charts where homeos so this is doable
yeah okay I see I see
and you think of whatever the appropriate domain/ codomain is and all that stuff
Is t an indeterminate here?
Also does this have to be true for every 2 charts for f to be considered holomorohic?
Ah ok
I'm good
nice!
so we are going to be focusing on the meromorphic functions now
which are very cool imo
so by M(X) i denote the meromomorphic functions f: X->C
read #❓how-to-get-help
liar
so right now I claim that M(X) is actually a field under function addition and multiplication
and my teacher don´t teach me from this
@cold needle help pls
lmfao
but ok getting back to my train of thought
please read #❓how-to-get-help and follow the instructions there.
ok
like intuitively that statement makes sense right
yeah I guess so
like you kind of have finite poles that you could cancel out and etc
The way to do this is cool but I wont go over it now
ill just tell yall the main idea
john trying to be dami 
so the riemann sphere, often denoted PC^1
is the one point compactification of C
the way we will think about this is that its just the sphere
and
let me draw this
we have the sphere with two charts
one is this one, where we are doing this stereographic projection onto C through the point at infinity
the other one is doing it through the point at the origin
does this make sense?
I don't really get this tbh. How do we do it through the origin?
oh, the same map?
Just think of unfolding the sphere around the origin
yeah exactly
yeah okay then I get it lmao
and you can also visualize this as adding apoint at infinity to the complex plane
very roughly visualizing, its like
you know how you have a 2-disk and you identify the boundary you get a 2-sphere?
The point at infinity is like, you are saying the infinities in each direction is the same point
yeah okay I see
and its doing the same kind of thing
It's actually a cool way to visualize a 3-sphere too. Just imagine our regular 3d space, but if you walk far enough in any direction you'll end up in the same spot
Not visualize cuz you can't do that but think about it at least
yep 
but yeah so if you think about it now
if you have a meromorphic function from X to C
then it extends to a holo function from X to PC^1
because the poles are like, kind of continously sending you to infinity roughly speaking
but yeah so M(X) is a field and you prove it using this alternate way to think about mero functions
the + is function addition and the * is function product (not composition)
so now heres the really cool think
thing
lets say you have
a holo map f:Y->X
then this induces a map f*: M(X)-> M(Y)
and this induced map is actually also a field homomorphism!
ill let u figure out how this induced map works 
its a good exercise while i get some water kek


M() is a contravariant functor
Fuck terra I was just gonna say that
it doesn't count because i'm already familiar with this stuff to an extent
I'm assuming it's just by composition? If g is in M(X) then g o f is in M(Y)? Supposing that the composition of a meromorphic function with a holomorphic function is meromorphic
tteppa
brofib
im taking this http://www.math.toronto.edu/mein/teaching/MAT1341_PoissonGeometry/Poisson8.pdf in the winter
should be cool
alright im back
yeah shin its just post composition
and do you see how this also a field homo

looks dope
lie algebroids
Yea
wait how is that?
I think
fish geometry
right so for example
(g+g') o f = g o f +g' o f
and same for multiplication and all that stuff
the idea is post composition doesnt really change your structure
so good to move on?
but aren't you supposed to show that gf(x+y) = gf(x) + gf(y)?
or does this fact come from this?
oh yeah right
and same for M(Y)
yeah okay I see now
nice! so
now we have an induced homo f*:M(X)->M(Y)
right
remember from field theory that all field homomorphisms are injective
so what we actually have is an embedding of M(X) into M(Y)
or in other words
we can consider M(Y) as a field extension of M(X)
so yeah we started of with holo functions in X and ended up with field extensions of M(X) which might give you a hint about the galois 
so now we are gonna compute M
M(CP^1)
and this is kind of cool too
so take a meromorphic function, say f, on CP^1
now meromorphic functions have finitely many poles(not at infinity) of finite order each
Meromorphic function 
so what we can do is, multiply our f by a polynomial to get rid of these poles
and now what you have is a holomorphic function
and now what are holomorphic functions on the riemann spheres? well right out the taylor series
and you realize you will need to have only finitely many terms in it
otherwise you have an infinite order pole at infinity
so this means its a polynomial
and so f is a rational function
i.e M(CP^1) = C(t)
i kind of went over that quick
I will let yall absorb
so questions?
john nazi arc???
get it cause
poles
Yes
laugh now
laugh.wav

ur a few years late unfort
hmm yeah I think I sort of get
wbu shin
I think I'm good
this is me right now
nice
so really one way to study field extensions of C(t)
is to look into holomorphic maps into CP^1
let me give an example
waiting for john to get inverse galoispilled
so we are gonna take the map from CP^1 -> CP^1
my disaster explanation 
thats just squaring
Into CP? not from CP?
right so sending z->z^2
now think about the induced map on C(t)
its sending the meromorphic function f(t) to f(t^2) right
bc post composition
so really this is the field extension
C(sqrt(t))/C(t)
i reallize using 2 CP^1 probably not best example too easy to confuse them 
but yeah we will go with this
now I want you to observe something nice about this map
its almost a covering map right
like if you ignore the point at infinity and the origin in this case
then its a two sheeted cover right
(say yes when yall convinced urself of that)
Can you define a 2 sheeted cover?
fibers have cardinality 2
yeah, and im assuming you guys know what covers are from AT
which i remember u guys are studying
if you think of the usual cover this means that if i have an open neighborhood U of x in our base space then there are two open neighborhoods, one for each point in the fiber, mapped homeomorphically onto U
I haven't gotten to covers yet (rotman goes in a different order) but I know what they are more or less
ie "two sheets" of U
Hmm well I don't really see how that is a cover tho
like the map sending f(t) to f(t^2)?
oh lmao
ig imagine like an open ball on the sphere
think in analogy with covers of the circle
which come from z |-> z^n in the finite sheet case
oh yeah okay I see now
yeah good example 
Oki
nice so this is kind of nice
Okidoki ✓
our this was just an example
but it turns out
that in general because of how strong complex analysis is
we have an equivalence of these branched coverings (ignore a few point basically and then its a covering) and a certain class of holomorphic maps
kek what i meant by that is how strong holo maps are ig 
so the precise statement is like
all holomorphic maps into X who is proper (preimage of compact is compact) is also a branched covering
I dont wanna prove this rn so take my word for it lol
lets show the opposite side
a covering map p:Y-> X into riemann surface X
can be made into a holo map by choosing a complex structure on Y
good exercise, think about how
tbh I don't think I can lmao. It's getting late here and I'm getting tired
hint: covering maps give us a local relationship on an open cover of Y to an open cover of X
what local structure do we have on a riemann surface X?
(you there @odd narwhal
)
johnathan DS moment
What do you mean by complex structure
complex atlas
Ah
Composing the charts on X with the homeomorphism from the open sets making up the fibres of the covering?
Something to that effect
yep basically
Uh you need to be careful
because the complex atlas and the locally trivial sets covering Y need not be the same
but with a proper refinement yes
its not that monkaS just take intersections 
Congrats on mod, Moth!
smh mothkaS moment
but yeah so the point of all that was
@blazing pawn btw just congratulations on becoming a moderator
that branched coverings of our surface and proper holo maps into it are basically the same things
and rememember how we used holo maps to induce field extensions of M(X)
so chaining along
this means we can use branched coverings of X to induce field extensions of M(X)
Fet_X moment
holy yeah that's kind of cool
toki you have not seen the very cool part
but it is coming
its easier if you've seen finite etale covers before
and infinite galois theory
mothkaS
right so let me gather my thoughts on how to do this
how much of the galois covering theory are u guys familiar with
I'm familiar with none lmao
none

Same
It might be a good idea t otake a break
yeah maybe
Maybe we can continue this tmrw
and for them to familiarize themselves with it first
Oof
indeed
yeah honestly I'm really tired (not from reading all of this but because it's getting late)
yeah let it simmer kek and if yall are like, avalaible sometime tomorrow ill finish this talk
Same it's 2:30 am
everything.
Also I've been thinking of this problem all day and it's pretty draining
it's 01.36 here. I mean like not as late as ShiN
So we can continue tomorrow?
yep i will probably free at somepoint to finish this too 
Yee
Okay great! Thank you so much for the explanation and all that stuff, it was really interesting! Good luck with the tutoring, good night! 
Yea thanks!
nice, gn to both of u, sweet dreams (about covering spaces) and etc
hello lets talk about benfords law implements if any one interested
benfords law applies to nothing, change my mind
@velvet dagger @vagrant kestrel @jovial ember @hybrid zephyr @sharp mulch how common is it for a (long-running) college club to die
reported
i was doing some research on the harvard anime club after i found that it seems their last post was from 2016
thats honestly kind of depressing
it just died

and it was started in the 90s
Anyways
Think of it as a Markov process
Each year, there is a small chance for it to die
Just via like
Human error/laziness
well yeah i mean it was apparently a rather small and casual club so like
And after it dies, it takes a lot more effort to revive
in 2016 ig just a bunch of key members graduated
and there wasn't enough momentum left
Yeah
Harvard people are too rich for anime
lmao
Cornell probably has a more active anime club
bro what cornell anime club's last events were in 2016 as well
holy
what happened in 2016
are we uncovering some sort of conspiracy
Just revive it
4head
Like seriously
i mean honestly if that was the case for my school i actually would revive it
lord knows theres enough weebs here
Yeah
i got my room assignment the other day and met my roommate, also a weeb

but anyways its honestly kinda spooky that cornell and harvard anime clubs died in 2016
tf happened
Purge of anime in 2016

i swear if i find another northeast college with an anime club that died in 2016
theres actually legit gotta be something up
ok i was ACTUALLY sad when i saw the harvard club died but this just pisses me off
THEY are doing such a better job than my school
for one, their webpage is actually updated
and has details about plans to resume for fall 2021
@deep mango now that you've been in Paris for an hour, do let Demmel and Holtz know if you want to postpone the meeting scheduled for tomo
over here i had to fuckin snoop and shit and find people and message them directly to try to find out whats goin on this fall
and the website hasnt been updated for like 1000 years
and then princeton's website NOT ONLY HAS A MUCH BETTER UI but it has a BETTER DRAWING, clearly lists all the eboard members, and not only STATES THAT THEY ARE PLANNING TO RESUME THIS FALL but also DETAILS WHAT EVENTS THEY PLAN TO KICK THE YEAR OFF WITH
like ffs how are there even weebs in nj
Is this expected for clubs
Do big CS schools generally have stronger anime clubs?
all i know is that they're doing a much better job
It seems like they would..
Arch just become president of anime club and lead the revolution
Not sure what other majors would work like that though.
What majors was your school known for?
like it honestly actually pisses me off because they seem like they care so much more
CS is one of them
Ig
I'm shocked and surprised at how your school failed to establish a strong anime club.
like if i actually were president at some point this is how i would want it to be
well first of all i would get the shitty UI updated for our page

Yeah they were sharing the same room as the smash club and that this small room in the basement
I feel like not many people in the math program at my school are very into anime.
sussin my way down town
I feel like you could convince a prof who teaches japanese to do it possibly?
Trust me there are
Secret weebs
Weebs in hiding
There always are
Sure
Everything was fine
Made it to the connection 20 minutes before boarding
ok this is not fair though like actually
Some past special events we've held include karaoke nights, origami nights, pictionary, debates, and our biannual jeopardy competition and 24-hour anime marathon!
On-Campus Activities are set to resume Fall 2021, and we've got some HUGE plans for our campus comeback. We hope you'll all be able to join us for what is set to be a brilliant year!```
why is the princeton anime club so well-run
The one time I went to berkeley anime club some guy pulled me over to a table and taught me riichi mahjong from scratch
🤔
It was terrifying
how many of y'all have a good understanding of the subject matter of all of the channels in this server?
define "good understanding"
Anime is the bad taste.
no the bad taste is not obsessively watching everything produced by random directors from the 80s and 90s
also liking anime for straight people
Ok let me correct that liking anime for straight guys
@leaden torrent im sure you do
well the definition is arbitrary
but
like you could have a discussion with someone about this
or teach them about that area of math
i could not discuss any of #numerical-analysis or #advanced-probability or #dynamical-systems with any confidence
I see
and my knowledge of analysis is early grad at best
I couldn’t discuss any of the help channels
LOL
i cant even discuss all of pre uni channels 
I can't discuss

I guess I can discuss some things. Pre university stuff is fine except I forget tons of stuff I shouldn't.
lmao
Early university is hit or miss since I haven't taken stuff like complex vars yet and I'm trash at basic statistics.
I'm also not super far into undergrad courses in general though.
I could def discuss the pre u ones (except competition math) as well as calculus, I could do decently with multivar, lin alg, discrete math, proofs/logic, and elem number theory, and im currently learning some topology
so I've unlocked 10 channels
plus math pedagogy since im a tutor
In comparison to a normal person off the street you know quite a lot of math if you think about it.
"average joe life" copypasta moment
Average joe copypasta?
yeah lol I would hope so since I've spent the last year and a half intently studying various areas of math
Average Joe mama ,
(I had to do it)
gg
The reason your dad is so disappointed is that he asks himself, "Who wants to raise a son who say yo instaid of hi and always take the lazt way?" instead of studying math. Math produces so many gems and visionaries because it is definitively hard, and has the hardest problems known to man, so men who consistently push themselves to solve adverse problems, will attain a generalizable ability to develop creative solutions to problems with ease as oppose to only dealing with the problems of a regular joe life, e.g. working at target and going to the local community college; people who have been through it develop street smarts and learn how to solve street problems, but you can only see so many street problems, there are thousands of math related problems in physics engineering and many other disciplines it is pure beauty! In fact, beautiful enough for him to ask you how that degree is coming like 3 times a month!

The reason your dad is so disappointed is that he asks himself, "Who wants to raise a son who say yo instaid of hi and always take the lazt way?" instead of studying math. Math produces so many gems and visionaries because it is definitively hard, and has the hardest problems known to man, so men who consistently push themselves to solve adverse problems, will attain a generalizable ability to develop creative solutions to problems with ease as oppose to only dealing with the problems of a regular joe life, e.g. working at target and going to the local community college; people who have been through it develop street smarts and learn how to solve street problems, but you can only see so many street problems, there are thousands of math related problems in physics engineering and many other disciplines it is pure beauty! In fact, beautiful enough for him to ask you how that degree is coming like 3 times a month!
Lmao
Combine this with the gem copypasta
one of the best copypasta i have seen, ngl

the funnier part was that some random person agreed unironically
"I don't know the exact context of the above message, but I agree with many things in the message. Pure Mathematics in some sense, is only one of the few fields where there is certainty and we can get closest to truth, it is amazing how even things which a high schooler can understand like "Can every even number(>2) can be written as a sum of two primes?" is open and is extremely difficult. Rigour in pure mathematics is the highest, and in some sense deals with things in it's perfect form. And in the process of proving so, some get closer to their self actualized version in some sense in my opinion.""

This does not change the fact that in Australia there are 48 million Kangaroos and in Uruguay there are 3,457,380 inhabitants. So if the Kangaroos decide to invade Uruguay, each Uruguayan will have to fight 14 kangaroos.
🦘
kangaroos solo
slimejesus
Slimrhesus
yes
Slimreeses
Slime
I haven't had a reeses cup in a while
The candy
I can imagine eating one right now though
We've talked about this before, namely, discussing the differing extents of how we visualize stuff but also mentally simulate other senses
For me when I imagine eating the reeses cup I'm seeing it, I can imagine the taste, the texture
Not sure if that's different for anyone else, I mean, aphantasia is a thing right but idk about for instance the extent to which one's capacity to imagine taste or texture would vary
my imagination is pretty shallow. it's clear to me what i'm imagining but it's nowhere near the real thing
...

this is fun
i don't want to bully ange too much though

still you must appreciate my creativity
lmfao
you had sullied me first and i was like
i thought i made a funny
emptiness of fading midnight...
king of the burgers
yeah 😔
fullness of waxing lunchtime
Maybe in a bit I'll return to Chinese poetry
yes
Eventual Return to Chinese Poetry
this was a mistake
now there are several people with the ange nickname style
this is gonna be pain
👀
Hi
only those who have read the prophecy will know which is the real ange
Metal this is entirely your fault
^
regretful influence of the moderator
Considerable Regret.
what's tteppa

hi

yea I know
Hi
my name was tterra but in russian once
Yes
you don't know the letter pho?
or it was greek
LMAO drake
same thing
fsdjkghlsdf
lmao
this is getting out of hand
yea r in russian is just r isn't it
I love pho, my fav vietnamese dish
p
lmfao
tteppa
lie derivative of the lie derivative 
Sophus Lie was a mistake
Is there a channel on this server where type theory would be on topic?
Chuuni names
chuunitenar

Cool
how do i ping toki lmao
ok yes get on here kek
@tokidoki
@thorn brook
@thorn brook

link to yesterdays convo to review or w/e
until toki gets here, he was online like a sec ago 
Meme review
oh he heas the studying role lmao
Oof
Lol
@opal linden ping 

ok he is gonna be here in a few mins
that's 6
kek
ohhh lmao you guys were trying to ping me here 
I'm too powerful for the pings, nice try 😎
@thorn brook

@fervent flame
@noble lotus How is the SMALL REU project with Miller going?
Could you describe what your project was about ?
Yeah
What was it about?

Zeckendorf games, random matrix theory, erdos angles problems, and irreducible sets
And they all have different feels
And like
I will have like 6 papers with me as coauthor
But I worked most on zeck stuff
which one was number theory
All of them and none of them

Well erdos is definitely not number theory
L functions group spends all their time like calculating sums and bounding stuff which like
Good for them some of my best friends are on the project sounds neat
But is just not my kind of math
Zeckendorf
was very baller
so like a Zeckendorf decomposition of a number is a way of writing it as a sum of non-adjacent fibonacci numbers
these are unique and always exist
and there's a particular game you can play called the Zeckendorf Game
which decomposes an integer as you play it
I like dont get whats the motivation for considering this game
and it's known that the second player has a winning strategy
why not?
I never know how to answer this question
it's because it's cool
It always felt random
always? Do you know about this stuff?
not much
I mean it is kinda random
so is considering special weird ensemble number 5000 in RMT
¯_(ツ)_/¯
the methods are cool
so anyway
our Zeck group defined a similar game for base phi decompositions, which is where you write your number as a sum of non-adjacent powers of phi
and we proved a few neat things
phi as in golden ration phi?
ye

(1) The longest game on n tokens terminates in Theta(n^2) time
(2) The game is played on a tape, and the longest the tape needs to be is like Theta(2n)
(3) A slight generalization of the game to graphs is PSPACE-Complete
(4) We can generalize (1)-(3) to dominating roots of Non-Increasing Positive Linear Recurrences, aka NIPLRS
(5) The number of summands in a base phi decomposition of a number n in [L_i, L_{i + 1}] (lucas numbers) converges to a gaussian as i goes to infinity
The proofs of (1) and (2) especially in the general case for (4)
are like
surprisingly nontrivial
and for (5) I didn't work on that as much but
one of my colleagues essentially proved a new Central Limit Theorem
do not google NIPLRS

PLRS is actually a common acronym in the field
Your project sounds cool
I mean Zeck is like my main project and it's getting a lower bound of 3 papers
4 if you count conference proceedings paper for (1) and (2) seperately from the journal paper for (4)
and 5 if Hamming Distances gets enough by the end to write something good
and it's just like very very neat
and the methods are dope as shit
monovariants, foreknowledge proofs, some algebraic number theory to get (4), and this like weird bound iteration process I came up with to match coefficients on dominating terms
getting the dominating term coefficients to match is actually something I can't do in the general case
that is like
very frustrating bc it should be doable with some more work but ran out of time
guess that's for Future Work
¯_(ツ)_/¯
there's some cool results in other stuff to
we proved one of Neil Sloane's open conjectures about lunar numbers
Lunar numbers are also related to like additive number theory /combinatorics too so it’s not just like
Rec math
Altho the two areas barely talk
ahah

@cunning elbow
i know it's impossible to answer this at this time, but when will math research plateau?
just looking for opinions from more qualified/experienced people
I don't think it ever will
more geniuses will come up with new ideas and potentially new fields in math that will have to be thoroughly researched
geniuses like me
define counting correctly
the act involving correct counts
define the
a word used to point forward to a following qualifying or defining clause or phrase
define
||
||
lizzar
he already got all your valuables
you just caught him mid escape
her*
she*
gg
wp
lizzaerfd
mizza
mriza
pizza
mriazma
im hungry now
for pizza
oog
in other news friends my summer semester is coming to a close soon and i only have one more final exam left to work on due tomorrow at midnight
kind of hyped to get it over with
a proper break is needed

why do startegy based games have mathematics as research option for ranged weapons ?
you need some dynamics to develop ballistic weapons
Ballistics is the field of mechanics concerned with the launching, flight behavior and impact effects of projectiles, especially ranged weapon munitions such as bullets, unguided bombs, rockets or the like; the science or art of designing and accelerating projectiles so as to achieve a desired performance.
A ballistic body is a free-moving body ...
idk it should be named physics.
math should be only allowed in creative mode.
too damn dangerous 🙂
now I am just staring at the points go weeeeee over and over
I bet black will win
How much free time does a undergrad in the first year have?
Like approximately
A lot or absolutely none
a lot/2
and it decreases rapidly
Depends
dang
Because exams and stuff?
Depends what major for sure
Assignments/exams, studying on your own
let's say bsc in math
Yeah, major/selection of courses, and most importantly how you respond to them matters a lot
And depends where u start too as in college credit etc
For example you're the kind who'd probably devote a lot of time to learning beyond the class as well I'd wager
well that's the thing. I really want to continue doing stuff that I'm doing now, but I don't know if I will have the time
But standalone, first year at uni isn't generally supposed to weigh you down, especially if you already have a hang of working/learning on your own
Also depends on how active u wanna be in college too (sports working out clubs…)
You should have enough time imo
yeah okay got it. Thank you!
And definitely how many credits ur taking
yeah I think that the credit system here is different idk
but I will be taking like 5 courses
or 4
i made it so i didnt have a lot of free time (mistake)
crap, that doesn't sound nice...
I had a good bit last year, this year might not. I’m taking 18 credits (6 classes)
And on top of that I’m already in like 5-6 clubs two bands and I work out and gotta prepare for internship interviews
I think that I will be taking 15.5, which isn't a lot, right?
No 15 is average
They want u to do 15 a semester to graduate on time most of the time
Does anyone know where I can find a copy of Evan Chen’s EGMO it looks like it’s out of stock everywhere also it’s a bit pricey
im surprised its not free online?
Oh maybe it is I’ll check more sorry
try libgen
jon sully does not represent the views of this server
i could find a reason to get you locked away for life.
we do not endorse piracy
Don't post links to pirated materials or endorse piracy here
“We don’t endorse helping people save money by not needing to fork over egregious amounts to enormous capital giants”
You realize it’s in essence file sharing?
It’s not stealing if someone bought and uploaded it for others to share
Its not a moral thing its just against discord TOS lmfao
Imagine letting a 12 yr old mod ur server lmao
Ageist Propaganda
zoph is right
the sooner this server removes mod as moth the sooner we will return to our former glory
Mod as moth
I endorse piracy
I endorse banning u 

i endorse deez nuts
Solution: start a competitor to Discord.
Owned
based
@crystal stone
Moon bears
I have great news
I convinced me mum that Cal CC is decent as f
It's the best backup plan
Lol
Yeah Im really happy
It's like the pressure is taken off
I can actually learn because I want to now
It's weird to explain but yeah
I mean certainly do it if it's a final backup plan
most community colleges are quite bad compared to other colleges and universities
My HS GPA is scuffed nGroupoid
Ah, there you go
So I have no choice
I'm assuming you did not get in elsewhere?
I don't think this is accurate in California for lower division courses
So not good enough for the top, but if I can transfer through CC
for something better than a community college
I can get there
I mean you can also transfer from not a CC lol
it's not as easy
Most undergrads at UCs start upper division courses their second year
I'm just saying the plan of "start at CC and transfer to a top school" is a lot more risky than you might realize
You can also do this while attending a CC
at a UC or CSU
What's more is the class you take is at a CC prices
a 3.6 is fine 
You just need instructor permission

For Berkeley, UCLA, Irvine, SD, and SB
The rate of transfer is a lot higher than you'd think for math
For private colleges it's harder to transfer in
But USC has been accepting a lot of CC transfers lately
Im looking at your website Moon Bear
And IM trying to find a CC with good applied math acceptance
this seems kind of silly just because like
you should probably talk to your counselor if you have one
You're not in the kind of position where strong state schools are inaccessible to you because you have a 3.6
Nothing is guaranteed for me tho
Apply anyways
I mean forget my overall
Nothing is guaranteed for anyone
Thats why you see where you get in and then make decisions
and I am immediately rejected
Honestly settling for a CC because of a reasonable GPA is moronic
Didnt we literally have this conversation where people pointed out to you that upward trends are actually viewed favorably
No one is going to autoreject you because of a 3.0 in freshman year
I guess
Seriously reconsider
No you dont "guess" this is a fact lmfao
Reject yourself before admissions can reject you
but still I am making a good backup plan
That's the way
Okay it’s only a backup plan if you’re seriously applying to other state schools
some schools dont even look at freshmen year gpa 
I hope you are doing this too
Alright solid, apply to more
UIUC is great for math
Also yea what
Hurb
idk
UIUC is great
we LITERALLY also had this conversation
I KNOW
Apply to more schools like this
ok I will have to think of some
Fight to go somewhere that isn’t a CC unless you have a really compelling reason to do so
maybe I can find a top school and do early decision
California CC's are free
yeah
Apply to like 12+ places idk
I really think CC is the way to go
it would be very bad if I get stuck at CC
like I don't get transfer acceptance
that would be horrible
I don’t regret it but I also don’t think it was the right decision
I would die on the spot
Why not apply and see your finaid and then make the decision 
Something that puts you at a massive disadvantage
yeah
Absolutely huge disadvantage
You are effectively giving up two years that you can have at a respectable department and building connections there
Unless you’re genuinely like mathematically disabled and can’t gain benefit from anything other than the base classes
Then this is a huge disadvantage
i rly wanted to go to UCB and UCSD
I guess I have to look elsewhere
but its tough
to find good options
Do you have plans for grad school?
Yeah I want to do it
UCs dont even look at freshmen year GPA
yeah
let me check my soph gpa
I just think ur massively overestimating the negatives of having a 3.0 in freshman year
and a 3.6 overall
The main issue is that especially if you have some idea of wanting to do mathematics, CC will just not give you the right environment for you to thrive, end of story
The main issue is that you are then facing a huge uphill battle to get the proper environment and advisors and so on that creates a good graduate application
I think this is relatively inaccurate
there are plenty of CCs with good math environments
my perception of all the CC students I RAd was that they were all super hard working and self-sufficient, but at times that wasn't enough for the amount of catch-up they needed to do especially in terms of research and grad classes for PhD applications. e.g. one physics transfer who i RAd had an extremely rough first semester because she had to do so much right away and didn't have time to adjust to berkeley rigor.
ra?
lol which ones
while it is totally possible for CC to lead into math well and to produce a well-rounded, healthy PhD student, it takes a lot of really dedicated work in those last 2 years of undergrad.
yes
I went to one with a good math environment and even that was very anemic
resident advisor (in dorms)
Fullerton College, Orange Coast College, Santa Monica College
all have solid math programs
Prof. Dana at Fullerton actually has students do seminars
Moreover, while you're at CC you can take UC or CSU courses at CC prices
Even in math
okay then that might be okay
I still don't think it's worth settling for unless you have better reasons
At Orange Coast College we had proof based math in the calculus sequence and up
i mean this is totally different depending on the CC you go to, but i agree california CCs near UC's are probably quite good
Ending on Spivak's calc on manifolds
how do I see which schools are good in Applied math? I dont know what ranking to. look at anymore
like CCs near me here in NJ are.... never gonna teach you anything besides strang-level linear algebra.
dont look at rankings, look at faculty lists
What about faculty lists?
for undergrad???
The linear algebra I had at CC was combined with differential equations, and we had to prove rank nullity on exam, had to prove independence of eigenvectors given that eigenvalues are unique
Like teacher publications?
oh
not even just like
for undergrad thats too much
look through who is there, look through what they do, if they run student seminars or whatever
just look at course offerings then\
for undergrad you don't have to be as thorough with this and things like course offerings or coarse ranking are probably more indicative
i don't think this experience is representative of the typical "good CC" outside CA.
So I should disregard ranking?
how much applied math do they offer? how much dyn sys? etc
But if you're in California, and you look around for a decent CC
It's very good
this is correct
but still look for what courses they offer, who is there, what kinds of things they offer
i will often judge the quality of a math undergrad program by their course requirements and elective offerings
this isn't a perfect way to look at it of course
also check how their programs are structured, 500 applied math courses wont do you much good if you can only take 2 of them due to all your electives
What is "Academic Decathlon GPA" ?
but at least it tells you you have the opportunity to dive deep into a subject you like and to develop breadth elsewhere, which is what's most important.
keeping in mind that some schools are a lot more flexible with this stuff than they look to be on paper (and some are not)
MIT moment
You need to be perfect to be the 1% of out of state
Lol
not UCSD
you really don't
i mean
maybe now for some reason
but i was absolutely not perfect
My gpa without freshman year is 3.769
covid was really weird and idk how that affects things
Is that what UC will see?
they will calculate what they want to calculate to perform a """holistic""" review
UC in San Diego admitted 51% of its out-of-state applicants compared to the 26% of California residents who applied that were granted admission. The numbers look similar at UC Santa Barbara, with 29% of applicants admitted being California residents and 47% coming from out of state.Nov 15, 2018
Again not true
tbf
Bruh what
those students probably skew stronger but still
I have an app that tells me these things
the people applying to UCSD oos
Its absolutely not remotely 1%
are gonna be on average better
UCSD has like 3% our of state
That is absolutely not true 
yeah that's not true
yeah im taking this into account as well
this app is clearly bad
thats still difficult man
I have decent EC and decent attributes/story too tho
that's my main ticket
if I can get these esssays good
but it sucks that its so hard
for OOS
I know people with GPAs equivalent to a 3.6 that got in
rly?
idk like
urs is probably higher because freshmen year is ignored





