#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 395 of 1
i am very cynical about the un and have very little trust in its political prescriptions
at least independent groups have some local accountability
How do you imagine that plays out? When do you decide that someone has become a dictator of a country?
The way I see, the two party system is integral to why the US turned out to be like this. Something more like a parliamentary system would have been so much better.
Can I still use that Declaration to prove my claim of rights being stripped or do I need a "better" list of rights
the two party system is not codified into law, whereas a parliamentary system is
Because that one is easy
why do you need a list of rights
tbh same even when they do make statments its usally very late but atleast it does help the publicity of and legetimancythat certain issues exsist
i mean not to get into a certain topic but a few years a back it was very hard todebate about that said topic even when there waas many local sources ppl just only bbelived western socurces and anything non westrn is wrong somehow..
I don't imagine it, I believe it.
And I would say it'll quack when it quacks. My perception of the next 10 years is like, a huge great powers divide.
semper aude!
So I can confirm my major minority gets stripped of a few in big countries
but of course that's future telling, idk
not as an answer, but to add things in
They are called rights so like, it works
it is the result of what is codified
if u want to make a point u collect evidence and certain poitns to support ur main point!
vance is lowkey going to win
I would define permanence as major obstruction within the country to the authority of a dictator stopping, however. For instance, no challenging institutions, centralized government, etc. Right now the USA is a democracy
rights are just useful fiction. and the best rights are the most fundamental. You don't need a list of 20 rights.
Too many uninformed people claim our rights don't get taken, I like having a comeback :3
what is a human right
-# i almsot sentthat one gif of vance head meme but then remebered this is #serious-discussion
vance is a talented rhetor, but i think trump will be an albatross around his neck
The right to uh uh not being murdered
tucker is the only person other than trump that has like a comparable level of charisma
uh the right to have basi cphysological needs and safety
... Carlson?
this is wrong
Uh.. there's this dumb system where you have two big tests, and 8 lesser tests. You have to pass at least 6 tests out of 8 of the lessers.
If I failed today's lesser test, I have no option to pass
the most important right is individual sovereignty. and that'll cover enough.
or at least he used to
Only option would be taking the finals, 3 attempt but fuck it! I don't like finals.
You failed 3 of the lessers then
These uninformed people probably don't know about the abuse we get basically everywhere though so maybe it will help weed out transphobes into blatantly saying it, making moderation easy
I don't know. It depends on whether I failed today or not.
tucker thinks trump is the antichrist (literally, not figuratively) and talks about how amazing putin is and how the jews run everything
he’s been delving into schizo territory for a little while now
If I failed, it doesn't matter anymore. Because I already failed two.
I probably can't determine that here. I would think positive future, and not negative on what could have been, if you failed.
Russia and North Korea are a democracy too! Putin and Kim Jung Un just happen to win the election each time! 😊
libertarianism is mostly impractical in the real world. but they do get a lot of things right when it comes to how rights should be defined
i mean this is a vague example of a right
Yeah I guess so but like man, I don't want to study...
I'm not sure there are institutiona that counterbalance Putin though, for instance. Actually idk Russian politics but like that's my impression
in china there are definitely institutions that counterbalance xi jinping
Social studies going on maths server
Like autocrat = power transfer only at death imo
like he definitely has a lot of people on his back about various things
Even a benevolant autocrat has that property
“having elections” is not a sufficient criteria for qualifying as a democracy 
this isnt really the case in russia
I don't like the idea of fucking finals.
Topics: series, induction and sum, divisibility, congruency, combinatory, graphs
“election” in north korea simply means “census”
I was being sarcastic...
ok fair I know
there is only one option and if you don’t pick it you die
the point is a lot of people disagree not on whether humans should have some rights, but what precisely these should be
I'm just dead serious that there's a USA autocratic government in the works, I think it's when not if
I think it'd be hard finding people who disagree with this
the US does have pretty good institutions for maintaining a liberal democracy. the fact that it still got to this point points out a lot of what is inherent in the actions of people. people just succumb to power. so there should not be such powerful figures in the first place for this to be even possible.
ideally there shouldn't be a head of state
a leader figure or the top dog
idk if I'd say the current state of government represents "succumbing to power"
Most of the worst actors were pretty transparent with their intentions lol
liquid democracy is interesting
the idea that the people should have the power to dissolve the government whenever
in my country, it is not hard to find disagreents about this
that everyone should basically be able to participate in the parliament
that of course would not work, so people should have the ability to delegate their powers to someone else
and that delegation should be retractable whenever
well that doesn't change much
I also disagree, but this may be an uncomfy convo
Ultimately the USA system is very federal, unlike many democracies, so once people get in power, they have to do something illegal to leave (and be impeached, at least federally, then convicted)
So there's nothing preventing the current President, say, from going forward in his role for the term
by the end of 2028 things could look very different
is that because interfering with state politics would be an overreach in the US?
power attracts the corruptible
Hi guys. Sorry to change the topic but I’ll be starting uni soon. Any textbook reccomendations or courses on YouTube to complete during the summer? I know most first year uni content already. But wanted to know if u guys have any tips. If ur in uni or done with it
wdym
For books ask in #book-recommendations
I believe the channel description says "or other resources" so you might get videos too
I suppose they do lie literally constantly, but they're not lying to deceive, it's dogwhistles
Oh Ty mb. I’m new tho that should’ve been obvious to me
Everyone against them knows they're lying, everyone who is with them doesnt care
It's fine, book recommendations isn't really as out and open as some other channels people often miss
Be a week ahead of time and people will think you're a genius
Yeah good point. It’s rly annoying tho how unis don’t put their curriculum on the internet tho. Like I could’ve learnt ahead so much earlier
except many do
Are you talking about your specific uni? I've found a lot of course material on the internet on subjects that are not in my major for when I want to study smth
If the interior angles of a triangle ABC satisfy the equality,
sin2 A + sin2 B + sin2 C = 2(cos2 A + cos2 B + cos2 C),
prove that the triangle must have a right angle. Where do i ask such doubts?
Ok
I don't tbink that's directly related, it's more just how we operate. In a lot of democracies "snap elections" are a thing and parliaments can dissolve. In the USA the Congress for instance never just dissolves, it just has occasional recesses for like holidays and things. In some ways, the federal Congress has some duties to continue to meet that other democracies don't precisely have. If you had other questions just PM me I guess.
There's also resignations, but they are rare.
are all of u guys in like uni
literaly just disabling my ability to see kudos and hits (likes and views for ao3) has masivly improved my mental health, would recomened on any website you post conent on
not being able to compair myself to others is so nice
i've seen it ruin people
if you're comparing yourself to better people then you will always have imposter syndrome
if you treat others better than how you treat yourself then you will end up killing yourself
its okay to forgive yourself
woah, thats subjective. for example, if you treat yourself like shi but treat others ok, you would feel sad because yuo are treating yourself bad. but if you give others a bit more than you, its not necesarily
i think
i may be wrong
i understand, also treat yourself how you treat others, that's a good middle ground
Does anyone have advice for someone considering pivoting into a pure math major from computer science? Any practical ways to assess whether it's a good path for me with a currently limited perspective?
im also interested in this. im considering switching to a math major as someone who is heavily invested into computer science. I think i could self teach myself more comp sci stuff. At the same time i think math is hard though
I'm sure just hitting the textbooks is usually the right answer, mostly curious if anyone else has done this and what the results were.
I suggest assessing the job opportunities first
Hey everyone I want to learn geometry from basic to advanced but I can't find youtube videos/lectures on it...
getting a "CS job" will not be so hard with a math degree if you take a few CS classes and learn programming
personally i did a CS phd with a masters in math so 🤷
also @near hamlet i guess
though obviously if all you want to do is computer science, getting a math degree is probably not worth it; however, its probably the only opportunity to learn mathematics, so if you want to do that, i'd say go for it
Hello everyone
Whoah, that’s awesome! If i may know, what are the prospects you can look at once you have completed these courses? Im yet to join college, but I’m curious about this
i mean a university degree doesnt teach you so much that is really important for a job and math majors specifically are valuable to the job market because they can quickly and independently learn new stuff
obviously you will be competing against CS majors but if you take classes in algorithms and learn programming its fine in my experience
lots of CS jobs are also built around random certs which you mostly have to get on the job anyway
Ohh, i see
I see I see.. im not particularly a genius in maths, per say, and its a common perception of many at my place that you need to be “gifted” to even survive a math major.. since you seem to have quite a lot of experience, id like to know how true that perception is

dunno, thousands of people complete a math major every year, hard to believe they are all particularly gifted
though at least where i studied the drop rate was 50%+
hundreds of thousands
source?
In the 2021-2022 school year, approximately 50,646 degrees in Mathematics and Statistics were awarded in the United States.
Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (IPEDS/Digest of Education Statistics).
america is less than half the world, you can infer there is at least 100k
cant find the data
it lists mathematics and natural sciences together
ok i found it
its 27,092 bachelor degrees actually
my bad its 27000
so yeah, i think talking of hundreds of thousands is a bit of a jump; however, it doesnt really matter, plenty of people get degrees in mathematics, i dont think everyone of them is particularly gifted
why not
well, i also met math majors and taught them for years 
your a teacher?
i ran tutorials for math and CS majors for years as a TA while i was a student
Hmm, yeah
thats nice
its certainly a lot of work
i wouldnt know
It sure must be,
Thank you for the info!
You have to be willing to work hard and just be of average to slightly above average intelligence not gifted. A math major isn’t for everyone but at most colleges if you do your best, read the book and do the homework, study and go to office hours you’ll probably be able to pass the class. Worst case scenario you retake the class and get it your second time around
Why am I even doing this math degree
Prof gives bunch of questions before midsem/endsem
Copies paper from there . Questions are such if you have studied their solutions you nail exam wlaw you can't
Wtf is this rot memorisation
I have not learnt anything properly barring stuff I self studied
I was playing around with complex numbers and Cartesian planes, then I came across 4D spaces on my own, then I realised even infinite dimensional spaces exist. I did some research and found out a function is an example of an infinite dimensional space. But how come, a function gives a value of x once at a time, but for a coordinate the values need to be simultaneously existent
The function itself is the collection of all its values
yes, I figured, thanks
I was thinking of a function as a sequence, but then found out that a function itself is a set
Lmfao this country is fucking cooked
IMPOSSIBLE CHALLENGE: my dad stops shaming every aspect of my body im already dysphoric about for things i cant control for 1 second 
Courts: “yeah the racist thugs in the South can basically draw up the maps in a racially-biased manner so there’s no Democrat representatives in the state”
Also courts: “erm Democrats you can’t engage in what the Republicans are currently doing”
Ur dad sucks
yay for democracy amirite??
my family in general kinda sucks 
now he's constantly shaming me about my body odour
like goddamn i douse myself in perfume and shower everyday and also im a hormonal teenager and also we live in the devils armpits of hot countries what fucking more do you want me to DO

“Why doesn’t my daughter (not the word he would use) visit me anymore?
“ - ur dad in twenty years
cheering for them
and hoping all is safe
hehe he wont ever know ill be his daughter bc ill cut my family off as soon as i possibly can 
AS YOU SHOULD GET INTO THOSE WESTERN EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES AND BECOME GONE FOR GOOD
YEEAHHHHHH
LIVE THE QUEER LIFE YOU HAVE ALWAYS WANTED
Hope they get rewarded with the flotilla breaching the blockade and all nationstates suddenly disappearing away into satan hell

I'm too fucking scared to, like the world is of a state rn that I feel unsafe not repressing my dysphoria to the point where I feel actively disgusted in the concept of being trans in the first place, like I feel I have to be disgusted or feel awful about it
sorry I know that's worded shittily
🫂 the world is rlly shitty, im sorry you feel that way
hab big virtual hug from internet fren 🫂
-# sorry i dont really know what else to say in these situations
I mean there's the whole very bad levels of internalized transphobia and homophobia, then the actual homophobia and transphobia from family, then me utterly crashing out and panicking about HRT like last week (idk wtf causes me to be so terrified of it), and then just the state of the world....
i feel u with being scared of hrt 🫂 like ‘what if i cant get access to it at all’ ‘what if i stop being able to get it somehow’ ‘what if it fucks up my body too much’ ‘what if it does nothing at all’
im probably being so irrational but i love overthinking 
For me it's a lot of the 3rd one and also the whole permanent changes thing but ig that's due to knowing that at some point I will lose most of my family
hmm 🫂 ig im kinda luckier in the part that i wont feel shit about abandoning my whole childhood life when i move out
guys how do I know which channel to sue based on the problem
you can use any avaliable help channels, see #❓how-to-get-help
oh haha, should have read the instructions. thx
no probss

ive prolly never travelled outside of a megaregion either 😔
This is kinda usual for big countries afaik. Most of their infrastructure is funneled into only a few spots and the rest is left to decay
Very comfy
so where will you be going? 
Idk

The age of rural settlements of small population honestly is not compatible with a modern industrialized globalized world
It’s way too much wealth and resources to direct transit, energy, telecommunications, et cetera to every small ass town
It was possible in a world where you could park somewhere and farm the land with lil issues
Megalodon mentioned
Also ngl rural areas are such hotbeds for child abuse and domestic violence. Because there’s so lil people there’s little understanding of what a kid is experiencing who thinks it’s normal.
Children need a bunch of adults in their life and shouldn’t be the fucking property of their parents.
I think the opposite is true, industrialization and our transition to a service based economy both lead to expansion of urbanization in America. But as we transition into remote work, if AI impacts white collar work to a significant degree there’s very little incentive to draw people into cities. If the economic opportunities aren’t confined to physical proximity to companies, cities are highly expensive and inefficient. The economic forces will be the opposite and shift back to incentivizing de urbanization imo
I dont see that being the case at all. People like cities because thats where people are, thats where art and music and things are.
That will be a luxury, not driven by the fundamental economic balance. For those who can afford that luxury, sure
Realistically who can afford to live in New York City or Los Angeles if the economic opportunities become decentered from physical proximity to these areas
The COL wouldnt just stay where it is if suddenly every business there just magically disapeared, but that just isnt going to happen
We will see, cities across the country already have issues after Covid where corporate buildings are sitting vacant and empty. Maintaining physical office locations is expensive the trend will be to minimize this expense going forward. Especially as we compete in intellectual work with developing countries, automation and AI impacting employment I really don’t see a return to the 1950s
Plus top talent already wants remote work, the only incentive for physical location is a place to put your top talent
i would prefer not living in a city, access to nature is its own perk which i vastly prefer over anything a city can offer
well, we adopted the rule that there are only offices for 40-80% of the workforce which works kinda with remote work regulations, but working fully remote seems unrealistic, 20% of our work has to be done on site
so i see downsizing but not abandonment
i dont like cities because there are too many people
I love cities because I love actually having things to do
i think like
large-medium sized town is the best
where you live in the suburbs but not too far out
I think a lot of people, especially Americans, just have a warped idea of what a city is due to horrific urban planning
Yeah I agree I don’t think there will be an abandonment either, but i dont see the trend reversing which will continue to make urban life economically unfeasible for many
also surprising amount of people want to come in every day (i think it creates a better separation of work and life), and personally i think its important to see the people you work with and socially interact with them at least occasionally
I imagine my ideal habitat migrating like a piece of the crust floating over a moat in the molten core, it wanders the earth as I age
Many will be able to afford that luxury, but it will become a luxury
figure by the time I'm 90 I'll just be alone on a mountain and never say a word yet experience utter bliss from internal mechanics
anyyyways american cities are great, I dunno what cities are catchign strays but north east coast cities are just generally lit IME
Why would it be? by your logic theres no reason to live in a city, so theres no demand and prices will fall. Your argument seems quite contradictory to me
west coast ones are sort of fucked up; like san fran is kinda sterile vibe and LA is a shitshow
There’s demand for many aspects of urban life and there still will be some level increased salaries tied to physical location or choice of those who have high paying jobs to live in cities. But average people will continue to be priced out more than they already have
los angeles is okay if you dont actually live in the los angeles part
Mostly due to a prioritisation of cars, lack of green spaces and any mixed use areas. Places like new york are pretty good because public transport works, but a lot of american cities are basically car parks, especially out west like you say (Ive never been to LA, but from what ive seen it looks like hell on earth)
It’s the decay of an already existing system
like if you live in like the less urban parts its actually extremely nice i think
can i attach files here?
san francisco is awful
i wanted to post a tweet by trump
genuinely unrelentingly depressing
My only point was I see a fundamental unwinding of the forces that initially lead to the levels of urbanization we see which is true
umm. what do you think of https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116539593510480846
yeah most cool american cities specifically don't prioritize cars, much like in europe
new york is kind of awful in my opinion because there are like a small number of very nice parts but like you cant go too far out of them before it gets bad
like NYC, Philly and D.C. are all completely publicable
also the subway is quite hellish
Seattle is actually great. and SF I hear good things but usually rent a car when I'm there so iunno
Probably a nothing burger but we will see what they release. If they are releasing info it’s only to screw with us in some way
I haven't experienced this and I've had occassions out in the bronx and way deep into queens
I think this is just not true
Agree to disagree chief, I wouldn’t feel comfortable sending my wife or kids on public transportation in those cities
I mean obviously it is subjective so maybe you have really specific criteria for being nice
well it also probably depends on the specific cases you have in mind
Why
it just depends on how hysterical your wife is
Ok i mean i grew up in nyc and 95%+ of children are completely comfortable riding the subway alone by the time they are like 12 at the latest
But people have different preferences, if people like cities more power to you. It tends to be people from cities who talk down on everywhere else
if they can't handle an occassionnal mentally ill homeless person being within 10 feet, that's really more a them issue, because there just isn't much evidence that there's any significant danger there

your risk of being in a traffic accident, however, is way lower if you're on a bus. And if you're on a train, I mean
Please do elaborate on why you think this, also on the wording about sending your wife places
good luck finding a way to get harmed
Yeah unironically I think the risk of being in a traffic accident is probably statistically higher than getting assaulted on the subway
What’s really to elaborate on? That’s not the type of environment I’d want to raise a family in. Some people are fine with it, that’s also cool
Ok yeah some cursory googling makes it clear this is simply true
I just wonder why you have such an object to transport in those cities, and also around the wording of sending your wife places. Thats quite a jump from I just wouldnt want to raise a family there
Actually its true by an insane margin
That’s what I meant by it, that I would be worried anytime my family was going somewhere when I wasn’t with them, which I think is just common sense
@glass peak
lots of people would rather get hit by a car than get assaulted on the subway though
like being in a car crash is like somehow a less scary concept than being shot or stabbed or set on fire or whatever
We can disagree on the pros vs cons of urban life
Most assaults are not getting shot, stabbed, or set on fire
A lot of this just reminds me about that fact that like 80% of Londoners say they think London is a safe city, compared to about 20% of people who live elsewhere in the UK
We can, I just think your wording is rather suspect
Like i would also prefer a minor car crash to getting shot but conversely I would prefer to get punched in the face by a stranger than having my spine shattered
yeah I'd trade a 10,000% increase of simple robbery over a 100% increased chance of a car crash.
oh no, I lost... oh right I carry no cash
my point is that there's something psychological about being at the mercy of another human in a confined space that is more threatening than like being injured in a car accident
if you drive in nyc you are statistically just way way way more likely to get injured in a car crash than you are to be assaulted on a subway, any kind of assault
man I feel way different
So far we’ve had people arguing that your wife or kids encountering mentally ill homeless people or crackheads on the subway is fine and a you problem to be uncomfortable with, that only some people get beat, stabbed or lit on fire on public transportation but that’s just a small subset of attacks

the fear and anger I feel when a driver is tailgating me dangerously is like
It literally is a small portion of attacks? Just like breaking your spine is a small proportion of car accidents?
I would say it's psychologically problematic for me. Once I considered chasing somebody
then I recalled what I had read about road rage and was like "that's not for me, gotta just let it go"
but it was some real shit. Vehicular errors are a leading cause of actual, real world, getting beaten the fuck up
I’ve seen homeless people in London carrying payment terminals. Not carrying cash need not remain protection for much longer.
Like isnt a basic part of existing in the world accepting the possibility of bizarre extreme random accidents happening to you and not planning your entire life around avoiding them?
I dont want a tree to fall on top of me outside but I still leave my home
That’s fine I’m not against urban life, it’s just not desirable to me
Not a crazy take at all, I would prefer to live elsewhere
This is just a somewhat insane thing to think about taking the bus
its not terribly insane i think
at least when there are pretty well publicised stories of various attacks on buses
nice, about time highwaymen adapted
How many people die in car crashes every year?
You can live wherever you want, obviously, I just think its a bit bizarre to conceptualize public transportation as being insanely violently dangerous when basic statistical evidence indicates that other modes of transportation are objectively much more so
like even if the odds are low, the fact it in principle can happen and has happened and that theres basically nothing you can do to mitigate it is enough to be unsettling for a lot of people
p sure tho my bank would just be like that's fine we cancelled the transfer, so unless they withdrew it from the account they dumped it to immediately, there's still a digital remediation
same kind of phenomenon as terrorism
I think I would seek therapy if I was so scared of other people I couldnt take a bus
who even cares? for real
I’ve also just been in many cities traveling for work and public transportation, you have to have your wits about you and pay attention to your surroundings. You can’t be naive about the reality of where you are
Like thats just fundamentally not normal
why not be scared of meteors? or any dog you see. You're more likely to get dog attacked
It’s irrational to be in these areas and not think this way
I view it as fine if I get beaten up or robbed, as I just paid the expense that most people benefit from every day by simply not having to think about it just as I didn't have to because it was so unlikely. And hey I didn't die in a car crash, the #1 way young adults die, so I get to try again the next day as a still-alive person.
the only people who seem to make a lot of noise about "crackheads and murderers on the NYC subway" are never the people who actually live in NYC and take the subway, curious...
Like sure but do you understand why if someone said they were moving to Cameroon because terrorism had made the US too unsafe it would be somewhat confusing
I would prescribe city bus-riding therapy to hysterical suburban housewives
The Governor just had to deploy the national guard to the subways due to crime and attacks, in the 80s and 90s the nyc subways were some of the most dangerous places on the planet for a time
this is literally all just exposure, it's similar to racism
like if you actually have experiences related to public transit, the irrational fears go away
Don’t worry, in this brave new connected World 3.0 we’re making, we’ll break all banks and replace them with smart, anonymous, irreversible contracts on the blockchain anyway.
Ok firstly the 2nd half of this statement is objectively ridiculous and you know that right?
Like this is hyperbolic to the point of absurdity
(guy who is obviously mentally ill) I am scared of the mentally ill on the subway
Even if it were true (which it isnt) its like 30-40 years ago lol
the most dangerous places on the planet is like, a trench in normandy in ww2, and that's it.
then like at 1/1000000th as dangerous comes roofers, wherever roofers are.
I’m not saying the subways are unusable, just pointing to NYC subways as an example of safe transit systems is
And secondly the governer deploying the city guard on the subway is not evidence that subways are dangerous relative to driving, its evidence that public perception is that subways are dangerous
Like 30-40 years ago Glasgow was the murder capital of Europe, genuinely huge knife crime problem. These days its completel and utterly fine
"knife crime" sounds awesome
Not to mention most of that knife crime was between people already living there etc, the average person walking down a normal street was fine
Well not even public perception its evidence that the governer thinks people think subways are dangerous
the most dangerous thing about Glasgow these days is hearing the accent
Wow now
Whats with the hate
or the drugs but you know
Bro...
For cars, as I was telling deltoid earlier today, I've been in 4 car accidents in the last year alone, I am frankly more scared of cars than I am of being assaulted on the subway
But I wonder if that has anything to do with my history and my brain now feeling like "just being assaulted" isn't "that bad"
Pissing myself laughing lmaooooo
stay away from drugs and cars fr
4 in a year is insane wtf
I was being hyperbolic but there was a crime wave and epidemic in the NYC subways due system in the 80s
I don’t even care about NYC subways, someone just used them as an example of safe public transportation which was a terrible example, my only point
epidemic of what? are you confusing HIV with crime?
cars are certainly very dangerous but people tend to forget this and overestimate how dangerous other forms of transportation are
Are you not familiar with NYC history at all?
I am aware that nyc crime rates were much higher in the 1980s than they are now
like many people are more scared of flying than driving a car which is genuinely ridiculous
super familiar actually just joking around
One was my fault, the second was in the rental car the week after when my mum decided to run the car off the highway and into the high speed truck runoff shoulder thing and then into a gravel patch, another was on black ice during a storm in december, another was a near wreck on a well known state route near DC on the way to my uni due to shitty drivers accelerating as I was merging into a lane and honking at me as if they wanted to hit me
cause at the same time HIV was a big deal and similarly was something hysterical housewives cared most about
I am terrified of flying, but that's probably due to how sensationalized plane crashes are
it's a parallel. I'm like understanding you as we go along, casting you into this archetype you are illustrating of yourself
But that doesnt mean that subways are particularly dangerous relative to other modes of transportation
I have placed you in space and time. You are a new jersey housewife in 1983.
also scared of sex due to trauma but also just an irrationally bad fear I'll get an STI, like yes it can happen but it's genuienly a way bigger fear in my head than the actual risk, esp with proper testing and prevention
Like it is just not true that nyc subways are dangerous relative to driving today. the evidence is not in favor
I never made the claim that they were, I never made that comparison
yeah it's 2026 now that's their major issue
they have a lot of points which seem to be like, based on pretty dated references
also pro tip about riding public transportation with the mentally ill: you are 100x more likely to have a bad time if you are afraid for some reason and end up STARING AT THEM
if you are a normal person and just mind your own business you will be fine
I hate when people even dare look at me on the subway
Yeah that’s the sort of situational awareness I was speaking of that’s necessary in cities
people are so dumb for trusting instinct that has been encoded in their brain for millions of years rather than pure reason and mzthematics🤓
I will utterly and completely crash the fuck out and have a meltdown if someone stares at me on public transit or in most cases in public :3
bro you're 100x more likely to have a bad time standing in line at starbucks if you're staring at the person in front of you
just be chill don't focus your attention on people who you don't know
This is pretty far removed from the initial point about economics which is all I actually care about
if you sleep and dream are you in the dream or is the dream inside of you
Some people like cities, some don’t that’s how preferences work
I think your initial point is like you don't realize that public transit is very safe in most major cities including the one you focused on
Without asking permission, mfs
might be the case that you also don't realize how dangerous cars are, and imo that's worth getting educated about
This conversation seems pretty pointless if theres no relative baseline for what an acceptable level of safety is. You need to leave the house and get around somehow. You can do that however you want. But its just objectively not true that public transit is a dangerous way to do that relative to driving, which in america is the standard baseline alternative
Like its not like anyone here is telling you to move to nyc you can do whatever you want
My claim wasn’t even that it’s less safe, I was only saying what my preferences are for how I’d like to raise a family which I’d prefer not to do it in a city. I’d be nervous not being with my kids when they were out and about which is common
Im not sure that point made sense either if it helps
I would also like my kids to be around nature, breathe the air that smells like cedar and pines like I did, be able to go outside and explore etc.
It’s a more appealing life to me
I love the idea of a hysterical wife and two extremely sheltered children walking down a street in manhattan in a swarm of assault drones
You claimed both that itll be a luxuray to live in a city because no one would be able to afford it, but also no one would want to live there, especially those with money
Ok but you also said that the nyc subway in the 80s was "one of the most dangerous places in the world" and that the governer had to deploy the national guard, obviously suggesting that that had to be done because crime on the subway is particularly bad. Clearly you are suggesting that subways are dangerous
Which is a fair and reasoable thing to say
If only you had just said that
see now we are almost back to the beginning of this which had me thinking I vibe with that
like that mid century american guy who lived nature, emerson?
he might have had it right. I am guessing when I'm 90 I'll think he absolutely did have it right
Like you cant act like this is a conversation about your personal preference when you have clearly and repeatedly suggested that the nyc subway system is dangerous. And my point is that the statistical evidence is that it just isnt relative to all the other ways americans normally get around
That’s not true, here’s an example of me stating many will desire to live in cities and it will be a preference and a luxury. Scroll up I said it earlier as well
@glass peak
I mean there can be more than one point in a conversation
or are we all trapped in amber
Again u can live wherever u want I dont think anyone in this chat is invested in whether you live in a city or a suburb or a small town or somewhere rural
I know what you said, I dont think its consistent or coherent though
and shifting topics is an impossibility
Or realistic
I said I might just live alone in the mountains when I'm 90, remember that
I might move it up to like, starting tomorrow
I may go ahead now and start today
How do you believe the economic forces that lead to urbanization unwinding will be reconciled with the HCOL in cities?
The crime wave was happening across the entire country and was facilitated by a ramping up of the Drug War
In addition, car fatalities never get considered by a lot of people who talk about public transit crime
yeah my ex's older brother did that and I was kind of jealous; but not a mountain, just some little hamlet in estonia
Both valid points
cause "they have good broadband and nice nature"
Because as ive said, I dont think it is unwinding, and I dont think the HCOL comes out of nowhere.
You don’t really think that industry is offshoring and employing less people, that white collar work is increasingly less and less centered on physical office space and increasingly digital and globalized?
doesn't mean the jobs that require physical locations aren't in cities
The economic magnet that drew people into urbanization is becoming increasingly decentralized and globalized, I don’t see a fundamental solution to this
Correct, those who have those jobs will be able to afford to live in cities along with those who have higher paying remote jobs . Everyone else, I don’t see how
besides, who needs a job to want to live in a city?
look at unemployed, or better yet, homeless populations
they love cities.
Ok many can be hobos in cities going forward
yeah so there's clearly something other than a job to a city
good dating, music, dancing, food, whatever
I appreciate VR is trying to pretend a "concert" in vr is something worth experiencing, and similarly plenty of businesses are pretending "dating" doesn't require in person connection
Being homeless isn’t a serious solution and what will happen from a macro view is spreading out to areas of less demand meaning more affordability. That’s deurbanization
Why don’t we all live in Manhattan or the Hamptons right now and instead live in less desirable locations?
idunno but tbh I'm not seriously engaging anymore, I'm just chilling out.
Fair
hi
Statistically, that's more to do with the fact that if you don't live inside an urbanised city, you're more likely to own the home you'd be living in, meaning that you wouldn't be homeless
You don't have to own the home you live in to fail to be homeless. Plus maybe the fact that its less desirable to live rurally is related to why its easier to own a home to live there.
I'm more pointing out that it's a bit of a stretch to suggest that someone homeless "loves" cities
I think its fine given that that is where there are the most amenities and resources for them
Yh but it's sort of like saying that students "love" exams imo
Yes they statistically do more exams than the average person, because... they're students, but that doesn't automatically translate into them loving the concept of an examination
I dont think the analogy holds and I also think in the context (showing that theres more appeal to cities than merely jobs) its perfectly admissible
I think I lost my advanced access somehow?
Yeah same..
Dunno, I want to answer somebody's question in #advanced-probability but I only have read access
Discords messed up right now, it's probably not working with roles correctly right now
I just assumed I was banned because the illuminati thinks my ideas are too powerful/dangerous
In two of my other servers it was acting like I didn't do the entering process (they have a thing to stop new users from just entering and being stupid bigots easily)
An unexpected error occurred while processing your command!
The error has been reported and should be fixed soon.
If the error persists, please contact our friendly support team at our support guild!
discord.errors.HTTPException: 429 Too Many Requests (error code: 40062): Service resource is being rate limited.
why did reactions re-break
also @night basin maybe restart texit to clear the API backlog (or do i not understand it at all)
actually hmm starting bots may be broken
unable to load parts of profile... for everyone
Ohio
a
starting bots is fucked rn
not anymore
I can't start either of mine 
random tesla car that was parked during the worker's right day march
btw there's a "anti fascist puppygirl" sticker there
FUCKING CGT STICKERS???
theres a fucking richerd nixon sticker there
Yeah i told you cgt is a french workers union
Cringe
There is a sticker that is an image of me on there /hj
True, tesla is cringe
i must have etheir forgot, or you told like maddy or someone, cause i do not have any recolection of that...

IM SOWWY
Idk why i posted that in serioussy tho
was very confused on why a black liberation sticker said "free palistine" and then i realized im a dumbass
Now you know
Yep, that's why it was covered up with stickers
me when i cover it up in paint colored stickers
but you see this would actually work
fyi the typing indicator API is broken so any use of it hangs indefinitely (at least in discord.js)

and due to how JS async works it doesn't hang the bot, only the command
Seems like Gowers has jumped on the bandwagon as well
https://x.com/wtgowers/status/2052830948685676605
this doesn’t do anything but
- net you internet points with people who already agree with you
- look very cool
“ah yes, now that i’ve seen this vandalized tesla, i will make sure to join my trade union”
Maybe that’s not their goal, maybe they just wanna enact massive shame onto the owner of that vehicle, and signal on the Internet that associating urself with Tesla products is worthy of . . . consequences
you forgot it being fun
the problem is that it isn’t.
you don’t see people toilet papering aisles for selling nestle chocomilk, even though nestle used slaves to make it
the only difference is that it is currently cooler to vandalize teslas.
i know it’s unfun and uncool and boring and bourgeois to say you shouldn’t vandalize teslas because elon musk is a bad person
but it seems true
I like how genuinely telling it is how stupid the average UK voter is after the local elections
You see with your own eyes and complain about how bad Brexit had been and then decide to go out en masse and vote for the moron who got you Brexit
Thankfully it's only about 30% of the voter base that voted for reform but still that's 30% that clearly are lacking a prefrontal cortex
@slow cipher wsp you were talking abt me?
yeah he's bad what abt him
They are moving awareness about that
yep pretty evil
no they're very much aware lmao
it's just that this is the place where we talk about epstein and everything
Need to spread awareness
Some people don't like abuse shoved down their throats mate
this is the place
Idiots make jokes about abuse, that's why this exists
In general
This was decided on after months of people being idiots
If we can't talk about the serious issues how can we solve them
We can't. Simple as that.
*you can
here.
Can't talk about it in mainstream but secondary more obscure media
Life's a bitch, what the hell is a discord server gonna be about it.
you rlly think a couple of internet randos can beat billionaires that aren't afraid to eat children
because this is a math server, not a politics or any influential server
No it's just the in general society
idk man the closest thing to influencing people to talk about epstein more is to lobby
No lobbying is corruption with a dif name
Most people don't wanna hear about rape, pedophilia, murder, suicide, bombings, etc... whilst trying to converse. That's why we have this channel.
I can't believe people would put there life on the line for baby eaters and redacted
well technically it's bribery but for the general interests of the lobbyist rather than just for crime
How much brainwashing it take
this isn't brainwashing
Oh wait this is about the news and trump supporters isn't it
Yeah they just ignore the facts icl
Nah in general there is no choice blue and red are same
hey dy even know what ur talking about btw ur just spewing buzzwords
I'm talking about trump as in the pedophile, misogynist, transphobe, homophobe, idiotic person. Not as in "Oh he is president boo hoo"
Because I can't be exact
For the same reasons
if you want to target something evil, be exact
Oh god you think this discord server is being censored by big news
you don't use umbrella words and catch-all terms to describe paedophilia, baby-eating, debauchery, and other nsfl shi
Are u apart of the isreal lobby
i dont have money so I can't lobby lmao

This just moves away the topic from the fact there is so much overlooked and ignored
also, what aspect israel are you talking about
How are people supposed to agree if you aren't explicit
More topic change from the baby eaters I see
you started talking about israel, I thought we were gonna talk about israel
US is a 1 party system disguised as 2 party system that is meant to be a democracy
so is it your tactic to just spew buzzwords and accuse people of being epstein-symphatics for talking abt said buzzwords
Buzzword it's self is a buzzword use something, ur being hypocritical
@slow cipher I've seen more effective disinformation from pinocchio
trump is trying to do everything to cover the files along with fbi and doj, the other 3 million files waiting to be released are the things that would incriminate people so they wont release it
So ur against there being more Epstein likes hidden and baby eaters in power
Just want to know
ad hominem
Respond to the message above
jsyk i dont support epstein and I cant change the fact that there's less media coverage about it
again, the most effective way to bring back epstein in media coverage is lobbying
It's a yes or no ur calling it disinformation that I talk abt it
no, im calling the fact that you're purposefully derailing the topic and screaming ad hominem statements disinformation
Examples
if you want to talk discourse on epstein at the very least be cohesive
exhibit 1
exhibit 2
Write it out
exhibit 3
if you're gonna waste my time more, get ignored
Nothing about baby eaters and Epstein likes being normalized* in democratic or not power being wrong?
Nothing about the content but rather the package I see
That's what I thought
Did you know over 7 rights of transgender people are actively stripped in many parts of the world?
I don't have much knowledge but what are the 7
I have a list of about 9 and a few extra ones on technicalities :3
According to the rights listed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (I believe that is the name) (yes I know these are quite commonly violated even for people who aren't in minorities per se, but just because they get violated on others, doesn't mean they don't get violated for trans people)
The main ones by the article number in the Declaration
-
(This discrimination is based on them being trans, violating this one)
-
(In multiple places trans people get the death penalty or some other form of punishment, not really safe I won't lie...)
-
(Transgender people were and still are ||trafficked|| heavily, though the most major case being ||Jeffery Epstien|| (tw: abuse+SA))
-
(Basically the same as 4, but degrading punishment is also sort of normalized in some places, so...)
-
(Do I even need to explain how trans people both now and historically in many places weren't recognized as people..?)
-
(Transgender people don't get equal help with things violating 4 and at least anecdotally are discriminated against with protection)
9*. ("Trump Administration Opens the Door for ICE to Target Anyone Suspected of Being Trans" is a real headline, asterisk as the headline could be called misleading.)
-
(Same as gay people both now and in the past, marriage is not exactly the easiest... plus, forced marriage is probably a thing based on 4.)
-
(Look up the definition of transphobia)
-
(Oh look! Rebranded 18)
23*. (Gender discrimination in the workforce exists, and minorities are discriminated against as well, so one can infer transgender being a minority they get discrimination here)
25*. (If we count mental health as well-being, transgender people often get denied or put through year long processes trying to "force them to be cis again" and this is not good mentally, but well-being is ambiguous, so not exactly 100% breaking this)
26*. (Last time I heard, minorities still get discrimination in education in some places, though I don't know for sure if trans people do, I can only assume this one)
27*. (Transgender people get hate despite the countless studies showing how safe it is, how little it is regretted, and so on, but tend to get "pushed out" from what I know, though this may not directly violate this)
30*. (Government's denying trans rights, though I guess they don't twist these rights to do it)
This is off a quick search of these rights, not even looking into the full documents for more nuance on whether the technicalities (denied by an asterisk) count properly or if there are more.
Oh I love being able to copy paste this list
Can Spiderman save us from 2–7 being violated 
Oh I can find the source for the headline, not sure if it's valid, but that'd be possible if anyone asks
I'm liberatian
Okay?
I support freedom and all equal
I didn't mean to word it that way
I don't understand why you say you are libertarian, that doesn't exactly relate much imo
I'm on the same boat
I mean I technically never explicitly said everyone should be equal... I said trans people get their rights taken away :3c
People getting their rights taken away in society is an issue for sure
Yeah it is, I'm just being annoying and pulling an "um actually"
Yo I didn't know what to add to the discussion mb
What countries are affected most by this, like for example 1st vs 3rd
I don't know all 1st and 3rd world countries, but I can list a few I used as examples in my head for some of those rights
Wait fuck I need to look that one up brb
Wait genuine question not meant to be rude in any way,
If u were trans then became trans again would u still be trans or not trans
Spotify became pay to play
Always has been
Is Forbes a valid source for ones that criminalize being trans?
Corporate tactic, first be cheap and become monopoly
Once u own all the preices in monopoly then start building house and farming
Trans isn't a strict binary, non binary falls under trans, so no
So u wouldn't be trans k
I don't think so it'll go according to their plans, it might backfire
"So no" as in your wouldn't necessarily be not trans, you most likely would still count as trans based on the sheer amount of things under the umbrella
Other examples of same monopoly tech
Unber, Netflix*,. there is alot more
"The 13 countries who specifically criminalise transgender people, mostly using “cross-dressing” laws, are Brunei, the Gambia, Indonesia, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Malawi, Malaysia, Nigeria, Oman, South Sudan, Tonga, and the United Arab Emirates. Iran’s Islamic Penal Code also has severe punishments for bending gender norms in your expression."
I am confused 😭
Trans trans is not a thing, you are talking about detransitioning, and that makes you cis I guess? Depends on the context
Say someone is agender, which falls under trans, then they transition to being demigirl, that is still technically a form of trans
No I'm talking about trans-trans is it the same as a negative negative
I refuse to believe there are trans trans people
You can transition again, but it's still just trans iirc
Yeah lmao
I mean unless you go back to gender assigned at birth
Trans trans would mean you identify as a trans that identifies as [GENDER]
So it will be (-) + (-) and not (-) x (-)
Cis has natural density of 0 if we take trans to be the natural numbers :3
I'm so lost explain this in math
Basically, transitioning to cis is very unlikely if it were to be random
Probability of 0
But people aren't random and so detransitions happen
U sure
It doesn’t make sense to “transition to cis”, and the concept of being trans is independent of transition
Yes, there are infinitely many types of trans compared to a finite amount of cis
So it would not cancel out?
I meant going back to being cis in this case, and transition to mean identifying
I don't know what "cis" mean gng
Cis is not trans
You identify as the gender assigned at birth
You identify with what the doctors saw on you as a baby
They only pick 2 options iirc
Being trans is any form where you don't identify this way, in the broad sense of the term
Meanwhile not even biological sex is a binary
They don't care about intersex, why do you think the surgeries happen
Okay so if u went from the most frequent 2 and transitioned twice would the person be considered Trans
If you transitioned strictly in the binary, yes, there are only two options so the next one is forced each time. But people rarely fit the binary exactly
Transition to what tho
Yeah
So it's either u transition back or u identity as a transition transition
People don't often do that
What if they can
Even detransition is quite rare
Inagine now a nested fully closed into itself transition
No but with infinite time anything is possible
They can, i have never once heard someone call themselves trans trans. Many people I know identified in multiple different ways though.
Yeah
If a monkey types the words "i am Shakespeare" is it?
I'm asking this because someone said to me that they will get benefits by saying they trans by transing twice
Please dont compare that user to a monkey
(Ignore me im just bored)
Benefits for being trans? Holy shit where
Lmao
This is literally unheard of
Here you do get quite a lot of benefits
what is going on this looks chaotic
Spill the tea
I got meds that give me depression :3
Someone called someone monkey and now they are arguing over the benefits of being trans
I was using a monkey for the infinite typewriter analogy...
sounds quite bad
nvm I saw the message we are gud
Is there laws that define who is trans and who is not or a know rule
Lol
Sadly yes, there is transmedicalism
That's more problems there 😭 (corruption)
Plus in many countries they try to detransition you, even in "progressive" ones
You can always DYU but I wouldn’t ever recommend that nor endorse it wink wink
That's under the we are denied healthcare
Normal healthcare?
Even in countries without explicit laws you often need gender dysphoria
Or gender specific
Thats a phenomenon sadly
Can we class antidepressants for depressed people as normal healthcare?
If yes, 100%
If not, still yes
Some doctors outright refuse to treat you even trans unrelated if you are trans
And a lot of doctors are sadly very transphobic
I'd call normal healthcare things that are needed to keep you alive, so in my opinion, very much yes, so many trans people resort to suicide over this
Whats ur opinion on born gender only leagues for sports
40% of trans people in the US have attempted suicide
I don't care for sports, plus biological sex tells you fucking nothing
80% thought about it
I'd argue 46XX DSD shouldn't be allowed if transmasc isn't allowed for male sports
Biological does have an after I think in sport gameplay
Its meaningless
Just because the genitals are one size at birth doesn't mean the body developes a specific way, I know this stuff
You have to measure hormone levels
Sex is based on genitals size at birth
Too small? Oh no, you are a girl, deal with it
More like how developed they are
And if functional or not
Eh I've heard it's mainly just the size
As people with vaginas also can be classes as male
Shoutout to all the small pipi people in chat, you are still a man (if you identify as such)
This is also why I don't care for sex medically after a certain age
Basically any bloodtest would be better and tell you more
Your genitals at birth barely say anything about later development
ALSO
Hormone levels naturally are different between people
Some sport segregation by sex without any valid reason (biologically at least)
Say Chess, men and women are on average just as smart
Yeah women just aren't as often given the chance to learn
This is why we should force all children into learning the rules of chess in third grade
I don't care enough for sports to make any arguments outside of "sex is fucking meaningless anyways"
This is a joke but in my country is not so much of a joke
That sucks
We were taught chess at the school
We have a huge chess tradition and even a world champion, is just a cultural thing
I used to love chess icl
In india too Im guessing
I used to love a lot of things
Woah isnt serious discussy that serious anymore? 
I literally just shouted out people with smol pipis so no
Want me to type something to wait for transphobes to catch the bait again
I think some sports based on physical might have to be birth sex based for fairness
This
Also what do you do with intersex people?
What is that
Throw them in with what the doctor said and possibly mutilated them to be
Is it people with both
Oh that explains why you think sex is useful. You don't understand the nuances
It's crazy that people are so convinced this is an important problem
Sports suck anyways icl
The gender distinction is already quite stupid imo
Because I didn't know anything until gr 7 when I learned there was "gay" I don't mean rude my wording sucks
Sex doesn't tell you how the body will develop.
Which means it's kinda useless to, get this, tell how the body developed
It doesn't determine most things absolutely but it certainly does tell you many things
It gives you estimates yes
What about natural
Sure most people assigned male at birth exhibit traditional male characteristics, I won't deny this
But it won't tell you enough to know who has an advantage and who doesn't
What if there was no gender specific sports and it was all just "sport" and no gender
This is bait
Why sport must exist 
Because it is like other things that require physical
Like sure, I'll say a transfem who hasn't taken any hormones or blockers is "different enough" from a cis woman with T levels to probably make a difference, but any way to include trans people either makes people angry over this, or is transmedicalist
325k russains soliders have perished
T is normally associated with some muscle stuff
But cis women can have high T levels too
What is the gender
Intersex is a pretty broad umbrella term that encompasses, among other things, various conditions related to chromosomes and genitalia (including "having both")
The reason that this is relevant is that such people are neither unambiguously of the male nor female sexes
Drafts should be based on ability, not randomly picking first of the imo...
And what is the "natural" without genetic or surgery interference tendency
So like, do you think they should play with men or women
Sounds like it's whatever the doctor thinks they see 
In practice it's often this but not uniformly
Oh there are nicer ways? Nice
If they do ability based drafts wouldn't people want to be less able to doge making the nation weaker

If people don't want to be in the draft so bad they probably won't make the nation much stronger icl
Deserters get death penalty
Plus anything I can think of for a gender based draft is inherently sexist so like... just do it based on criteria like I believe is already done
They get death either way mate
So we should do equal drafts then

People might transition to doge drafts
Sure but this isn't the same as just having low morale lol
You know what liberal democracy is actually bad after all thank you Russia
I can assure you this isn't a massive issue based on how it can cause mental issues if not done properly
Is this ragebait?
That's why some of us transition, to fix said mental issue by moving to a state it affects us less
But if you are in a state it affects you less and move to one it does more, that's not good
In the event that gender affirming care is made more accessible and a draft is instated, it doesn't seem entirely absurd to me that a nontrivial number of people would transition to dodge said draft
Plus why wouldn't trans people be in the drafts?
Oh wait I forgot some governments don't see us as people or as mentally sound
I just think that this is a stupid thing to worry about because who cares
That first condition is why this isn't an issue to be fair
If they're willing to go to that much effort they could also just break their ankle or something
These stupid debates are a product of Russian influence, active measures
A government that won't draft trans people hates them enough to not make care easy
Probably better mentally if I had to guess
I'm not entirely sure I'm convinced by that lol
increase divisions, institutional distrust, exploit the weaknesses of free speech
Though I guess people could do DIY if given enough heads up to a draft
when will America learn
Oh no I guess broken bones does do lots of mental strain
Just because mine didn't affect me doesn't mean it can't be crippling for others
I forgot how serious some breaks are
I don't quite follow? I think the idea behind rebirthedlegend's concern was "the government treats transitioned women as women, and thus transitioning gets you out of the draft"
A government that isn't transphobic to that degree needed but is sexist to that degree needed sounds kinda unlikely to me
Probably the above is poorly worded, in that what I meant was "in the hypothetical the government treats..."
This actually seems immensely likely to me lol
I mean, insofar as a government which isn't transphobic is likely
Would a perfect world be equal or eqatible
Equal ignores issues most don't have
Which one
I wouldn't enjoy an equal world icl
So eqatible right
I think, I don't know the exact definition though
But if it's "everyone gets what they need" then yes
Vs everyone gets the same
With everyone getting the same, either many wouldn't get proper care, or many like me would be overwhelmed with the sheer amount of unnecessary things
What if we are at the same intellectual as chimps
Plus how would that work with surgeries
Ask a chimp ig
I just idk, have not really commonly seen this kinda stuff in nature prob might not be able to think right bad on my part but idk
Animals changing sex happens in nature
Though I can't think of any explicit species, it happens.
A LOT.
Insects mostly
Intersex forms are also so common it's crazy
Though nature isn't eqatible as it isn't a thing it's just the way it has worked. Things with successful offspring survive and continue.
And frog :3
Yeah some birds have crazy high numbers
They are making the frog gay and trans
A sex is a common thing
Forget gay uncle theory, transgender aunt theory
And transitioning does occur
And by they? We mean god
Gayness is also really widespread in the animal kingdom
What about female spiders eating males after trading genes
So is eating children:3
This is feminism, feminism is also natural
This is sexism in nature we must remove it
Define "widespread" and "common" and explain what that's supposed to demonstrate
Komodo dragons do same sex is they can't find opposite
Feminism is actually lesbian geckos, you aren't a feminist if you get with a MAN
Make me do it.
Natural arguments are kinda useless anyways imo so nuh uh
Yeah
Most of ur reasons wouldn't like surgery exist if it didn't
Whats natural or not is ultimately irrelevant
Please explain this point
What about practical
Wdym
Surgery is useful for many of us to keep living :3
Should we set up hospitals doing mass transiting to make all rwjay
You might not know this but transness is fairly rare
Should we set up hospitals giving mass antidepressants..?
People should be able to do whatever they want but rationalizing it as a not a cultural phenomenon is just cope
Depression is more common than transitioning so....
The media has overblown a “trans problem” for like the 29 trans out there
Also another question not meant to be rude ebht I'm just curious (I am bad at wording)
Do people have mental illness before transitioning or does it happen because of what happens after
Before
I legally couldn't transition when I was diagnosed
Also morally couldn't, that's years before puberty starts period.
Ure high asf, give me some of that
Some trans people don't have this mental issue though
So people transitioning after mental illness would it transfer to the suicide rate
It's the same thing with ADHD diagnosis
Or is it separate
Theraputic culture is just very corrupt and it's interesting to watch in real time
Suicide rates drop when healthcare is provided
A lack of care is attributed to higher suicide rates, and Trans people have higher suicide rates than other gender minorities
Canadain does opposite they help u
Plus, gender dysphoria can cause depression as well
Not properly
Would lack of care not be the cause of ilness in first place
And also depression can cause gender dysphoria, is complicated
It forms in many long before care is feasible
I am just saying I think it's the same factors
It just happens in some, in others it is a lack of care
No, I got it before a lack of care would matter
We should tackle the core cause of mental illness
I was not "different" from others at that age outside of the social construct of gender
So lack of healthcare?
This mental illness just happens
Trust me, there isn't a "fix"
Not for everyone with it
Many of us will die with this
Wait that actually doesn't say much uh
Many of us will live an entire lifetime with this
This may sound the same, but it's technically not, as this can be a shorter span, due to the death being caused by it.
Core cause of mental illness: social media
Its a big factor
I wasn't on social media at 5 mate 
No?
Some people have it at 3 years old.
I sure hope not
More like "networked content platforms" there's very little social about it
I was a playful kid back then
How old are you anyways?
In fact, I knew I was trans before knowing it existed.
A minor 
Damn
Oops my opinion doesn't matter anymore
Sorry for the friend request
it actly doesnt yeah
Your opinion starts to matter at 57
It's fine, I tend to ignore ones from people I don't remember much interactions with
this channel is for serious discussion between serious people so
Aw darn it...
Aight ratgirl smite me with the role
im not ratgirl.
Then call them
never make that mistake again
Really?
you too? what a day
I always thought you were an alt account from ratgirl
We need to go full accelerationist flooding the internet with AI
Yes!!!
Then I can die in peace without real news :3
Wow you are kinda blurry
the purpose of this channel is to protect ppl who dont want to read the news
quite the noble cause
Yeah my fault chat
I wonder if my family could, like, not nitpick and shame me for everything that's wrong with my body??
guess what, im a hormonal teenager, and double guess what, i hate every aspect of my body too! but i can't control my situation and much less my biology yet! so maybe, politely, respectfully, with all the politeness i can muster,
shut the fuck up 
maybe if you want to shame my shitty eating habits, listen to my multiple concerns over an eating disorder. and take me to the fucking doctor 
What is polecat doing here
You are so annoying
Who
seething 
hi @cunning adder
<@&268886789983436800> snipe em
@torn snow we don't allow advertising
I was sniped it seems
im srry
It's in the rules last time I checked
came back to this srvr after 2 months
helo there
This sounds so shit, hope things will be better for you
ty ty 🫂 💜
My sympathies trust me things will get better
Polecat is a cute kitten in real life she just acts like a evil monster
X-3=2
X-3-5=2-5 [-5 Both Sides, Balancing]
X-8=-3
(X-8)^2=(-3)^2 [Square Both Sides]
X^2-2X.8+8^2=9
X^2-16X+64=9
X^2-16X+64-9=0
X^2-16X+55=0
X^2-11X-5X+55=0
X(X-11)-5(X-11)=0
(X-5)(X-11)=0
X=5, X=11 since we have to satisfy the condition.
Add - both sides at both answers
SOLVED THE HARDEST ALGEBRA
yes this is very serious and fitting for this channel
Keep it serious dude
Ping mods broo
That's what someone who hasn't foynd the antifascist puppygirl sticker would say
?
how is 11-3 = 2
is this ragebait
Bros creating solutions which didn’t exist
No.
11 is a negative number blud
I told add minus both sides of each solution
"first solution is x=5. For the second solution you have ti change the equation"
Is future predecided or random?
Why does polecat have a reputation here?
But I Hope polecat gets better and gets out of the situation
random just means you don't know
like, why not both
what's the difference
-# is e+pi algebraic? we don´t know but it´s not random.
-# also some people very much would like to believe in free will and people deciding to be good on their own and such
every single philo chud ive had the displeasure of speaking with insists that free will doesnt exist and that the person theyre talking with capitulates to this idea
It seems pretty difficult to have morality and ethics, justify laws and punishment, have relationships with others without some level of autonomy and moral agency
Making an ideal reality is like forcing all real gases to be ideal
It cant be
every midnight god rolls the roulette wheel and uses the results for the next day
local predestination
hard determinism makes things pretty hard
and philo chuds pretty hard
ooh how do you like that pun!?!?
@wintry kelp
I'm on here too much and have no life. 
tyty 💜 🫂
I'm just here to rage bait
Hey guys, what are the best textbooks to learn algebra 1-2, trigonometry, and calculus?
(I mean a textbook for each one, I don't need a book that covers all of them).
Just use lang's basic mathematics alongside stitz zeager precalc (second one available for free), then something like spivak if you want some theory, if you want computation just use thomas or stewart or strang's book (last one free online legally)
Wait, can I find all of these online for free?
Where should I go to find them?
legally? only stitz and zeager and strang
https://www.stitz-zeager.com/szprecalculus07042013.pdf
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/res-18-001-calculus-fall-2023/resources/mitres_18_001_f17_full_book_pdf/
Thankyou!
you'd have to buy lang and spivak
my good friend anna from undergrad has a large archive of books maybe she has them
it's funny you say that, I actually have a close friend named anna who just finished her masters' thesis in alg top
But, wait, do they have long sets of problems that I could practice with, or do they just explain it?
Open them and find out :)
That's not very helpful.
spivak's calculus has a very large selection of exercises and problems
The books I mentioned are freely downloadable, so download them and check if they have exercise sections (spoiler: they do, but you shouldn't need to ask such questions when you can check it yourself, esp with a freely available resource)
But yes lang and spivak have lots of exercises, you can also confirm this from amazon listings or stackoverflow posts about both books
Some of this stuff I already know, where should I skip to?
Yes that is the actual book, but be careful because even if that link is on the archive, Serge Lang died less than 20 years ago and copyright lasts life + 75 in the US, so that means that that link shouldn't even exist in the first place as that's pirated media, also posting pirated media is against server rules, so remove that link please
I will comply, but, I mean, it is on the internet and smacks you in the face as soon as you search up his name.
Yes it does, but doesn't mean you're exempt from checking the copyright dates and stuff, on the internet the burden of proof is always on the user in this sort of case
You can use whatever resource you find online, but the actual discussion of piracy is against server rules here
Noted 👍
I wish you well on your mathematical journey, feel free to ask questions in #prealg-and-algebra #precalculus #proofs-and-logic and the help channels if you get stuck. You can also talk in #math-discussion if you wish to have more general discussions on a wider array of mathematics topics
Thankyou!
I am looking to become a physicist, and I asked some people where to start, and they said to do this kind of math.
This is very much the starting poin, depening on the types of physics you want to do, after precalc, and only if you'dlike a much sharper jump in difficulty, you could skip Spivak's calculus and jump right to something like zorich's mathematical analysis 1 and 2, amann and escher's analysis 1, 2, 3, or similar, but having seen some of the ideas of calculus before would help, so it just comes down to how you want to proceed, for physics, once you know calculus you can start reading like, taylor's mechanics, griffiths or jackson e&m, shankar for qm, etc...but by that point you'll be far more aware of your own skill and what you'd want to do. If you want to do theoretical physics, you should definitely also learn some modern/abstract algebra, and such, but either way you 100% also should do linear algebra, but that's a while away, don't worry about any of that right now
Yeah, right now I am struggling to do sinewaves, so I am going to need to do a lot of math.
Me too
hello hello
ok ima get cookin on da aztec
Guh
yippee
i mostly ask bc i wanna know more ab my ppl before spaniards/conquistadors basically fucked my ancestors' entire societies and land over
Idk any astec culinary specialty
So basically its a mxi of both archaeology and "word of mouth" (this is one of the most interesting yet vectors by which we get the info).
well, both of these are very interesting tbh
i see
first you have the actual archaeology: temples, city remains, offerings, causeways, burials, ceramics, the whole physical record of where people lived and what they built was documented both by the conquistadores as well as subsequent historians
.
now it is important to note that the "aztecs/nahua" had actually their own writing system
yeee that i vaguely know of
i'm much more nerdy about the maya writing system for god knows what reason
now thatws interesting
and the soviet(?)/slavic(?) guy with a cat who deciphered it
hmmm how to talk about this
so the whole mesooamerican world had actually a whole bunch of different pictographic/glyph-based writing systems which were all fairly distinct but all shared a common resemblences with stuff like calendars,, codices, pictorial historical records, etc. The maya script was a densely phonetic/logosyllabic script and was the first that we know of. interestingly, the writing systems did not really appear to descened from any common ancestor (in the way that like a bazillion alphabets can be traced back to the phonecian script). Aztec script was much more pictorial and symbolic with a focus specifically on names and locations. I think it was fairly rare that a glyph would stand in for an actual syllable in nahuatl
makes sense
yahh
now back to how we know about the aztecs
a lot of this is from spanish colonial records
which, while by and large extremely unreliable, there are nevertheless many of things that arent just "some colonial shit written down by some conquistador". a lot of the most important information about their culture and society was recorded by indigineous scribes and informants to the spanish, some of which come to us in spanish and again some of which come to us in the OG nahuatl script. so we have actual nahua accounts of the conquest and of pre-conquest society, just written under colonial conditions, which obviously complicates things but yeah does not make them useless
now
the mesoamericans had an extremely rich tradition of oral histories
as seems to be somewhat universal among peoples who do not have access to writing
was there any actual truth to all the shit about human sacrifices (the shit that wraith practically chalked up to "probably may as well be true XE something something common in human cultures worldwide")
i see
that tracks
it is only (relatively) recently that the kinda colonialist attitudes toowards oral histories as being just "they spoke to each other about stuff and passed it down to the next generation or whatever" like, oral history in these societies was nearly always its own actual disciplined cultural 'institution'. you had specialists, priests, elders, scribes, ritual performances, genealogies, king lists, migration stories, sacred histories, political histories, all preserved in very structured ways. and then in mesoamerica specifically this was often tied together with codices, calendars, place glyphs, tribute records, and other visual/written systems. Now spanish friars actually ended up documenting a lot of this oral history in a way that was quite accurate - their motive was typically to understand it so that it could be properly suppressed and "modified" to fit with christianity or whatever. But yeah a lot of the nahau were interviewed and gave these oral records to these priests who for bad reasons but reasons nonethteless recorded these pretty accurately
yes
i see
human sacrifice was a real part of axtec religion and an important state ritual but the spanish obviously had every reason to exagerrate and moralise the absolute living shit outta it
it interests me how there were (seemingly at least, idk) both friars trying to preserve this stuff and zealots trying to destroy it
two sides of the same coin type shit
but we do know enough about it to my understanding (i am not an expert in any of this just for the record) such that you can read and understand a lot about human sacrifice not just in the aztec empire but throughout earlier time periods across mesoamerica
