#serious-discussion
1 messages Ā· Page 323 of 1
Also don't concentrate only on studying, do other life activities to avoid depression.
Go gym, socialize, etc.,
solved my depression in 2023-24
how old are you btw?
17
hm
Just checking mah rank

after one menty b and 5 klonopin later im finally numb enought to start taking notes on shit that i forgot

at least i like my study highlighters. they don't bleed on notebook paper
peak humor in high school was when an assignment named by collegeboard said l'hospital's rule
what about it?
looking for advice from someone who took alevel maths and further maths at college uk
Me
Mod cloud? Based
Can the definition of a derivative always be used in differentiation?
when will psat scores come i think i did pretty good on the math part
It is the definition
There's usually a quicker way though
I know that, but in the first semester of university, specifically in chapter three of Thomson's Calculus, when you're differentiating, you should use its definition if the question asks for it, and if it doesn't, you should use the simpler rules of differentiation. But I didn't understand the method from the professor.
I don't understand what you're asking then, it sounds like you understood
Although I'm at a university in an Arab country, it uses English as the official language, which complicates things for me, especially since we relied on Arabic in high school, and then suddenly everything became English. This makes it difficult for us to understand because we need a layer of translation within our minds. I understood the material perfectly when we were used to studying it in Arabic, but after seeing it in English, I no longer understand it. I don't know why the government is doing this to us.
š¤
The command is confusing
isn't the definition symbolically expressible?
Yes, but sometimes they force us to use the definition.
yes, it would get really annoying if the function is complicated enough though
Unfortunately, it's very annoying.
But ultimately, it's important to understand where the derivative comes from.
Is it university of Abu dhabi
as an average chinese sophomore how bad is a 1470 psat (710 eng 760 math)
did u really reply to some random message from a year ago ā ļø
You don't get the joke gang
You will someday
no i get the joke but why did u reply to it just now
Cuz somebody else replied to it, and i just not realized i was supposed to reply to that, not this
oh fair
which math is the hardest
Every
What is the easiest research discipline
postgrad math
ragebait

I mean, that says nothing about my ability to research new things
Welcome to the server @cold needle
my current relationship with math is wonky.
so.
iām a high school dropout.
i dropped out of algebra 1.
i did pass pre-algebra with an A when i was 13.
fast forward to a year ago, at 36 years old, i spend the summer doing some algebra self-study, and then my community college puts me straight into pre-calculus.
this is because the local colleges do not have anything below precalculus for credit, so, i will not get financial aid if i take algebra here.
i pass precalc with an A, but the class has so much online work that itās hard for me to assess how well iām actually doing, what iām actually learning.
i take trig the following semester, and it feels like an extension of a couple parts of pre-calc. i like it.
i pass with a B.
knowing algebra more thoroughly would have helped.
now iām in calc 1,
itās going⦠okay??
iāll pass???? most likely???
but since itās all online, and since i donāt have much of an algebra background, itās hard to tell what iām learning.
and since the school skips algebra, the way theyāre teaching calculus feels very babymode, even though itās still calculus and going over all the big concepts.
it just feels off.
and what i think i wanna do, is maybe go over more algebra self-study over the winter break, or try and do more practice problems from calc 1, before calc 2 next semester.
maybe this is just how calc 1 is supposed to feel. i dont know.
iāll watch youtube lectures, posted by professors at other colleges, and it doesnāt seem that much different than what we do here.
i coulda spent some time tonight after finishing up some homework for the night doing extra study but i played some starcraft instead.
talked to a couple friends.
dont feel like suffering and grinding all the time.
congrats on getting to calc 1!! probably a good thing to take breaks sometimes too
how they're teaching calculus doesn't really sound too different from what i expectāit will help a lot to know calc 1 well before going into calc 2, if they're what i think they are
Time you enjoy wasting isnt wasted time
Also breaks are good in general, to prevent burnout
how do u guys got a special color on ur profile
itās a nitro feature i think.
i have free nitro due to friend who works for them hooking me up.
i dont remember if discord regular has custom profile colors.
ty
itās likeā¦. since i didnāt get to take algebra.
there is algebra-stuff i am learning via immersion while taking calculus.
and
iām going in to physics
unless i switch to compsi
but my professor said once i get into the actual doing-physics part, i will only be using certain parts of calculus.
and if i go into compsci, she said iāll mostly be doing linear algebra, and not much calculus.
so like
as long as i learn it enough and pass my classes, cool.
something just
feeeeels
off about it. maybe the way college rushes you through it in just one semester. thereās not a lot of time to sit and digest each concept.
Sheās right
Physics is a lot of differential calculus too
Just certain things tho
certainly feels like college has less time for calc than hs
i think theres a lot of calc in cs in certain areas though
i might unironically radically shift majors to audio engineering and music production
but i also kinda figure learn that later or in my free time
iām a firm believer in never going old, so iām not worried about losing creativity with age
i would have to decide within two weeks
No ur right, you can never be too old
And youāre not even old š my father went to med school in his late 40s
Motivational.
nah he not nprmal
I agree 
depends
The math you havent understood yet
I'm in a bit of the same boat. I'm 15 years separated from my last math class and jumped into calculus and discrete math 1 and 2. Nearly all the things I got wrong were misunderstandings or misrememberings of algebra. I'm going to go run through khan academy after I finish my BS to brush up before I move on to more complicated things. Cs get degrees.
gl and have fun
Will do
At what point in someones "mathematical career" would they be comfortable with just sitting down and working through a textbook?
My university is getting rid of its complex analysis course, which I absolutely want to learn. Is it feasible for a 3rd year undergrad to be able to do so? I'm currently a second year, and still struggle immensely with just sitting down and attempting questions unless i have seen something similar before(eg, i can do epsilon delta proofs with polynomials, but only because i had to stumble through 5 or so with linear and quadratic functions)
It still feels like i kinda stumble around, so i havnt been able to do lots of questions in textbooks
You can start doing that from day one, it'll always be hard
Whats important is to find a book at your level, and to conscientiously work through it without cheating yourself
You dont have to go through the whole book, but for the parts of the book you do go through, do it properly
Maybe the textbooks i have used are bad lol. One of the first textbooks i used was written by my professor (actually published, not just course notes written up), and i found it okayyyyy. Though i recently started Kreyszigs Introductory Functional Analysis with Applications, and although i am only ~20 pages in, i have really enjoyed it, so it definitly does help finding a good textbook. Thank you!
For complex, Ahlfors should be good, my friend was using it and his feedback was that its nice, but the exercises are hard
Then again it depends on you and how well you click with the writing style too
Thank you! Ill check it out.
hii
helloo 
Ummm how do i increase audience on the server i made myself
Not promoting a server so mods dont ban me
I want to grow a server where people have intellectual talks and have fun doing it
Learn something new while having fun converstations.
But i dont know how do i gather audience
He just reallyyy wanted to be a doctor lmao
Hiii
hmm I think starting out inviting some friends who you know are smart and often like to talk about such topics would be a good start
Iāve helped a friend grow their server once but it was for a cookie game 
Sure !!
sorry for the extremely generic advice lol. iām sure someone has some better advice for you trust
No worries
iamweb3user1@gmail
Less is more. if you can just find a single person that melds well with the environment, presumably who youāve known and has mutual interest in concepts, the server can thrive. Time, time, time, everything takes time, you just have to do the time.
thanks buddy
is the "what level of math are you studying" actually for what i do in school or what i want to discuss?
im in 9th grade but wanna talk about complex analysis
If im not mistaken youāre free to talk about whatever math concepts youd like regardless of education level
So i wouldnt really worry about it
yeah i was just a little confused because of the names of the channel categories
but ya they cant check anyways so who cares
didnt see i had access to the adv math category without advanced roles. mb!
The undergrad role or above should give you access to those channels
yeah, idk why i didnt see it.
ohh its because i had pre-uni
as i said im in year 9 so im not exactly in university
Here the roles are based on your skill not your current school status
alright thanks!
We need a dropout role
Approximately, of course
But yeah itās based on what math you study, whether itās at that level
sorry to ping again after a while but I just saw this and thought I'd add some advice also: it's completely normal for new problems to be hard in the way you described. it doesn't mean you're not doing well. when you self-study from a textbook, you should expect to fumble around and fail a bit, and expect to spend a lot of time on concepts (they'll seem basic looking back). in fact, the time you spend trying to figure out a challenging problem is arguably some of the most valuable time you spend thinking about math, so don't be afraid of that
also, being in university gives you an unusual amount of access to people (despite not teaching it actively) who have a deep love and understanding of math. most mathematicians would be more than happy to help you out if they have the free time
look into whether your university lets you do any sort of independent study for credit, that could also be an option for you. at my school, we can take a course for credit and a grade that is just independent study directed by a professor in the department
I have noticed that, especially this year that i have been able to essentially knock on doors of certain people and get the help i need, which has been amazing.
Sadly we canāt do an independent study thing, my complex analysis situation is a bit weird.
Iām in my second year, second semester. Just finished Real Analysis, covering the actual definitions up to the definition of a definite integral with a small sidestep into topology with open, closed and compact sets.
There use to exist a 3rd year complex analysis course, that picked up from the 2nd year real analysis course, and learnt all the complex analysis up to and including the Reimman Mapping Theorem.
In 2026, they have remade and are moving complex analysis into a second year subject, to match the pace as Real Analysis. Infact, real analysis is no longer a prerequisite, so complex analysis would recover limits, and sequences ect. Which i donāt want to ālearnā all that again.
One professor recommended i take the course for a easy high mark, then self study and ask extra questions during tutorials/workshops, which i think i will end up doing
Oh god, that is so much writing, my apologies
no worries. seems like a fine enough strategy. I think self-studying it would also be reasonable, although more difficult of course
Because it lies.
?
to Beleive we must know truth,a lie like a sequence (Xn)n in N Xn=e^n , n in N exists is a lie
math is a game of meaningless symbols.
Read philosophy
what kind of necro is this
have 1 rule : Never beleive , say ,do anything .
except after knowing the truth if you're beleive is correct ,
exept If what you said is truth ,expet If what you gonna do is based on correct beleives to be done correctly.Never and ever 100/100 follow what you dont know certainly you must have complet certainty . #study-discussion message
I appear to have gotten a ping
Hey guys Anyone here who's hispanic?
yogurt
lmao
Welcome to discussion two
ššš
what this calls for is the coal alarm
ts is crazy
Yes
De escalation is impossible for some so here we are
yeah its less fun than pissing off larpers
hi
@cerulean sage You can go to sleep now, let the grownups talk for a bit.
Yes
šŗ
š±
i WONāT go to sleep
"guyth stop huting our collective feelings"
6:30 is a bit too late for kids
Now discussion 2 becomes trash
this kiddo thinks hes some grown up
yeah who couldve seen this coming
bro turned 17 a few months ago
š„
Shocker
Are we allowd to post GIFS in this channel.
No
absolutely
Literally only chill

At least nobody has modpinged yet. š„³
hi
Congrats carbonite you are respectable now
im deleting this bc im gonna be literally killed by mods
Apparently larping as cops is fun
i have a question

is anyone here in college
Or bureaucrats
Thanks bro šæ
W Carbo. ā¤ļøāš©¹
Stop posting it so much please though
I mean currently it's definitely cops
gotta respect a hooligan
It generally just sucks
It does get a bit grating after 100 times
Aren't you the guy complaining about life?
In this economy, you bet!
ā¤ļøāš©¹
Or was that someone else
ig
I think bureaucracy exists only to keep people with jobs
Ultra paid respect to the tank GIF in discussy one final time.
I would say seeing tank gif once a day may get old but it's by far not the worst thing I've seen
Agreed.
If we didn't have slow bureaucracy we would have high unemployment.
At least temporarily
Do change it up sometime ykwim
Variety and novelty
Assuming someone lives up to 79 and sleeps for 8 hours every single day they would have 14,843 days remaining left to live. To put into context how short this number actually is, 2020 was almost 2,125 days ago.
Why bother even going to college studying hard to get a high paying salary
None of that will matter in the end we wont get to keep anything once we die
i do wonder how much of the gif complaining is exactly about the fucking tank
which as a reminder, started with ME
i am the cause of this
and now im a mod!
its like atoning for my sins
im not going to be baited into arguing abt bureaucracy nice try
ng playin' with fire
A lot
You can never match carboniteās aura
The tank gif has become legendary, the issue will get worse
Brilliant
bureaucracy is an entirely empty word. unless you actually define the work you feel is useless, u are just engaging in pretty empty rambling.
You're not that important
neither r u!
You're just wrong though because you can just define the work you think is useless
Weird response, I am aware, you didn't seem aware
And if people are aware of your beliefs then you can use words like that with meaning
statists when they realize the government they hoped would save them is just a larger scale version of the DMV
I think most people see bureaucracy as handling documents, making official paperwork etc. Things that could be sped up or given to a computer to handle if the will was there. We could streamline most official processes if we had enough will.
we could streamline most official processes if everyone simply consented to the surveillance state
You'll have to elaborate on that one
I for one do not want my communications with the government to be more efficient, in fact I would like the literal opposite
Efficiency can go hand in hand with privacy and security. These things are not mutually exclusive.
yes but unfortunately this is not how this often works in practice
often government processes are made willfully inefficient for political reasons though.
like how tax forum assistance companies lobbied the government to kill the irs e filing program they made
I haven't filed my taxes 
And in the US you canāt for free anymore
We need strong privacy laws and regulations for this. Enforce encryption and minimise data collection. We can still have super efficient systems. We take what is necessary for it to function and no more.

no?
same
I think there's a big opportunity for any country to absolutely dominate and obliterate every other country in the world in terms of HDI, economic growth and just overall living standards if they apply the principles of efficiency.
no?
if it were that simple you would think it would already be done.
xkcd 2044
this was not the only free option lmao
there's plenty of other free options that still exist
I don't know why you assume that politicians have technical competence or will for this
technocratic governments exist but they dont exactly blow literally everyone out of the water.
they do pretty well though
IRS free file is still a thing and works if you make less than $84k
What?
I am yet to witness a technocratic government
Haven't seen one in my 2000 years alive
politicians have expert advisement, or what is supposed to be. they arent just swinging a mallot blindly. and when people write policy, they often attempt to write informed policyā¦
ofc politics is king in things, but even politics itself is often a response to to scientific results and modern knowledge
lmao
They attempt but they often have no clue because they aren't able to discern information properly. Like how is someone who doesn't know more than basic highschool maths going to write informed policy about AI? We just have to hope that they listen to the right people or that the right people give them money, which is quite unlikely.
u wont find some uber technocratic state in line with the vision of the technocratic movement. but the modern governments of Singapore and China are often described that way.
it has less to do with them not being able to discern information properly and more to do with being actually evil in most cases
China and Singapore are wrongly described that way. They are two extremely ideological governments and are not really technocratic at all even if they apply some elements of a technocracy.
yeah i mean. thats kind of my point
its political, theyre completely capable of ot
they have the information and policy at hands to do tjings the way experts want
and they are aware of expert positions
Few of the world's problems come from evil. It's very naive to think so. The real culprit is stupidity and ignorance.
cope
They are not capable at all. Did you go to school?
Think of your class as a representation of society.
genocides do not happen out of mere stupidity and ignorance, this is an absolutely childish take
People don't magically become competent when they become adults
Yes they do
name an example
WW2 genocide of Jews.
Yes a few evil people at the top, but mostly millions of stupid people
u cant just be ānot ideologicalā though. technocrats and positivists are, however ironically, entirely ideological. and just kind of ended up fueling pseudoscientific movements and are found these days holding onto the tail of the republican party, which is entirely and directly anti-science.
i mean id say aiding and abetting in genocide is pretty evil regardless of whether or not its stupid
I'm sorry that you have suffered from lead poisoning
Donald Trump is the perfect modern example of how stupidity causes harm.
Mercury, perhaps
if youre going to make this argument, define stupidity
a very large portion of his supporters are knowingly cruel rather than ignorant
Interesting take
Is the intent not important for determining whether something is done out of evil or not?
I think you're being very naive
I think the same of you

š„
intent is a different matter. do you seriously believe almost everyone complicit in the holocaust was duped into it somehow?
Generally stupidity in this context would encompass behaviour that causes unintended consequences or unawareness of the consequences of the behaviour.
š š š
Intent is pretty important in my opinion for determining whether someone is acting out of evil. You can call something evil for sure, but if the person who committed the evil wasn't thinking they were then they were stupid. Most people complicit in the holocaust were duped. People are not free thinkers generally.
being a "free thinker" and being stupid to the extent of being even partially absolved are two entirely different things
Ignorant take. It's incredibly naive to think we could solve all disagreements merely by being equally well informed.
No amount of knowledge makes you able to think critically
I don't think what I'm saying is illogical
So [do] you believe in objective morality?
it's not, you're just following the logic to very stupid conclusions
yo
To a degree yes. But the idea of people being stupid rather than evil isn't dependent on this.
Morality and Values aren't objective
hot take stupid people are evil
You can't use logic to derive moral statements without at least asserting values (themselves arguably moral statements)
If you wish good for everyone and the people around you and have a good heart but you are stupid and your actions indirectly lead to harm because you were unaware or unable to comprehend, then stupidity was the reason behind the caused problem and not evil.
This is another discussion
do you think that most Germans participating in the Holocaust had a "good heart" and "wished good for everyone and for people around them"
What on earth does it mean to have a "good heart" or "wish good" for people around you
Not at all
not committing a genocide for one thing
You are supposing this is the moral thing
It is often moral to make someone suffer in the short term for example
tfw you open the channel and this is the first thing you see
I think most Germans were unaware and thought Hitler would make things better for them and German society.
I would say prison sentences are, generally speaking as a concept, moral
But you also need to discipline and train people generally speaking
i think stupidity is evil and humans are inherently evil because of universal cognitive biasesāthe only way to protect oneself is to have power over other people
nice
Peak
Everything is evil chat
there are levels to this, I think you are heavily discounting the extent to which the average German during that time held cruel and antisemitic views which led them to knowingly and happily support overtly fascist policy
@zealous garden I think you can get what I'm saying. Just look at any dictatorship today, like Russia for example. Putin's followers are mostly ignorant, not evil.
most Germans were unaware
turning in your neighbor
people can comprehend theyāre doing harm, but wish it anyways. not everyone who does evil is acting in ignorance. nazi ideology and fascist ideology in general are not movements that act in ignorance, but instead move with the knowing intention to fight who they declare as enemies.
No comment
I disagree with your point
Yeah but itās just like not the same at all is it
Teichmuller
maybe it's more helpful to illustrate the point in current politics rather than politics from a century ago. Do you have any idea how many people in Europe are completely conscious of the fact that they are openly racist towards Romanis and are happy to joke about migrants drowning in the channel? They are happy to double down on this even
But knowledge doesn't solve fundamental disagreements on what is Right and what is even important to optimize in the first place
It is ignorance of the real enemies and ultimately causes themselves harm.
Further than joke about them drowning in the channel, the number who support sending the navy to shoot their boats and cause them to drown
the average voter in the UK is like, extremely eager to support mass deportation of any non English person at the moment
I'm not sure this is something you can attribute to ignorance alone
Iām unsure id say the average, but yeah fair point
Have you seen the interview of the guy who said reform arenāt extreme enough and then quoted mein kampf recently?
if the recent protests are any indication I would say this is roughly the average
The fact is there are often people who don't just want something different than you, they actively want the opposite. Even when all you want is to live in peace
(There are people who want conflict and nothing more in life. For a non genocidal example, Johnny Somali)
I do attribute that to ignorance and stupidity because I see racism as something emergent from that.
Nope being the exception as usual
I think you are blissfully ignorant to how much of this comes from willful malice
That's just an incorrect attribution then
I think there certainly a lot of people in that camp, but I also think the popularity of reform is massively over exaggerated and that not all of their supporters are as extreme in their racism
But itās absolutely fucked, like thereās no denying there has been an unprecedented rightward swing and increase in racial discrimination and tensions in the UK over the last like 3 years, really particularly in the last year
But the popularity of the greens currently is giving me some hope
It's statistically improbable that such a high percentage of the population would be psychopathic
I think you underestimate the Machiavellian tendencies of many people
That is a stretch. People can choose their enemies. Even if everyone was aware of their true enemies, fascists would choose new enemies as well.
You underestimate how many children watched public executions and cheered for gladiators
What's that big word mean, is that string theory?
if by string you mean noose
Youāre discounting the social factors here. There was propaganda, people were raised being told lies about Jewish people, it was kinda all around. If youāve been conditioned to accept that someone is acceptable to hate it isnāt even psychotic, because to you itās just completely normal, it isnāt even hate. And if it is, they deserve it, etc
But there also just are far more people than you would hope that seem to enjoy the suffering of others
I don't think that most people are so unaware that they don't recognize the cruelty of these kinds of views
Fascists ultimately cause their own demise so it is incredibly stupid. I refuse to believe that a majority of a society would willfully want to end itself and have their community and loved ones destroyed.
they are aware enough to justify them
But there's a better question to ask, who says cruel means immoral?
Chat talking about morality 
based
i think it is possible to have a system of thought that predicts the expected shoulds and don'ts without ever referring to objective morality
after all what an agent thinks is right is just whatever is in their utility function
is your only dismissal of fascism that: it is doomed to end in defeat? you cannot know the outcome and neither could they. they thought they would win and they would get away with it and they couldve. some facist regimes survived decades and got away with their crimes.
If you have an intended goal and fail then you acted stupid did you not?
if they had won they would make us believe they're right and we would never know the difference, so i think nothing makes fascism inherently unviable
i don't agree with it because i personally value not killing people but that doesn't seem to be a common sentiment
yes but thatās not really a heuristic you can use when making decisions in the present.
If your goal is to increase GDP and you end up decreasing it then you're pretty stupid right?
āif you miss this jumpshot youāre stupidā
All governing forms that miss are stupid

all governments fail to achieve some objectives, hence all governments are stupid???
Honestly kinda basedā¦.
truth nuke
no!!! i do not think that is a useful model
Perhaps, quality of government should probably be thought of as a gradient
what if the government succeeds at its evil objectives though
this does not inherently reject fascism either btw
or does so through evil
we would not see them as evil!
Then it wouldn't be evil
can complete narrative control even exist
Assuming that you don't think it's evil
If something evil occurs because you were unaware it's different, then it was ignorance and stupidity
I think we as a society place too much stigma on killing people
-# -Murderers probably
malice and evil are separate things i think
-the alt right
Do you not believe in the death penalty?
i don't
for...?
@zealous garden Do you feel like punching me
My hyperbolic conclusion is that I believe in the return of roman gladius
Heinous criminals should be made to participate in death games for the amusement of the rest of us
Punish criminals + Generate value + Reduce population strain
Win Win Win
do you know what a criminal feels
have you heard of the brutalisation effect
No but it sounds like something a pussy would say
also the 3rd factor here is a non-issue unless you expect to kill a significant proportion of the population
Pain, after I hurt them
The entire prison population
kind of. its rather more like the average person is wrapped up in culture of the moment. there are always undercurrents to whatever is going on in the mainstream culture though.
the nazis did a complete take over of society, every organized group of people from bookclubs to sports clubs was forced into the party line or made illegal. and even then people had opinions event if they couldnāt voice them. more just forced into the machinations of a machine they despised, but participated in to survive. you could loosely estimate this section of germany society at no more than 20%-35% of germans at the time.
you must become a criminal to know
blocking you for this
Wait no don't
I'm guessing they feel shame
- devaluation of life
- erosion of moral horror
- sends message that state-sanctioned killings are ok and encouraged
- causes higher homicide rates (this is debated but there is a correlation between the death penalty and increased homicides)
I could end all poverty
Holy shit you weren't joking?
I'm confused but go wild
agreed, but i suspect a significant portion of the population disagreedāi think for fascism to work in the long run the state must have near-total agreement to dehumanise certain groups of people
I don't buy the third point
you literally proposed violent executions as public entertainment
All the world's problems are really easy to solve. Theoretically we can sort out extreme poverty, climate change, education and most other important things within a decade.
If Execution of heinous tried and convicted criminals = state sanctioned killings, then I think that's a good thing to accept. If by the latter you mean to include disappearing people from their homes that's a different discussion
you would be surprised. the nazi party in shanghai held an election allowing other parties, 3 months after hitlers suicide. they won around 80% of the vote.
this is a rare case where i think "Think of the children!" is appropriate
im aware of that; we might disagree on what "significant" means
I have some measure of agreement with this
You say it would cause a devaluation of life, but I honestly think not having it creates further detachment from your mortality, which often leads to immorality
what??? are you suggesting that people in countries without the death penalty are unaware of death, and hence immoral????
No
@light gate Naive
I'm suggesting people living in circumstances with threats of death removed become further detached from the reality of their mortality
k
And that detachment from this reality, mortality, leads to many immoralities
Attempting to build vain eternal empires for example
you realise you're conflating "threats of death" and "death penalty"?
The death penalty is a threat of death
Is it the only one? No
then why would your argument hold
- you're proposing a much stronger claim than the death penalty
Removing water from the basin doth lower the level
not for most people
Yes, but I've also said this is my hyperbolic conclusion
you have not justified this either
This is the most extreme version of my position I'm willing to entertain, I have reservations
Well I'm not sure what you want me to justify about it, but I'm willing to try. There are certain individuals who should not be allowed to live. For the safety of ourselves it is necessary that we are willing to take the lives of others. So the question becomes what separates self defense from the death penalty? The death penalty is (ostensibly) a direct extension of self defense principles. Perhaps one is to argue this is too "retaliatory" as the death penalty is only ever enacted after a period where it's arguably been shown that continued captivity is a viable method. If captivity is not possible in some scenario, this in itself becomes an argument for the death penalty.
Heinous criminals held in captivity still poison the pool of us all, performing interviews, eventually leaving in some cases, interacting with friends, family, and their keepers. Depending on the nature of their dangers, all of these bring further risks which depending on their character and natur of their crime, may warrant some "self defense".
And while it's not a "necessity" argument exactly, I believe that if you sneak into a house and murder an entire family with children in their sleep, and try to frame someone for it, you should be killed. There are certain acts that are unforgivably heinous. Prison is a place for rehabilitation, and you deserve only punishment. Punishment is not something I would generally like the state in charge of, Death puts it in the hands of our creator. Furthermore, I generally abide by a principal that if you attempt to kill something you are consenting for that thing to try to kill you, so the criminal can't complain.
For example, Charles Manson would be a great death penalty recipient
Many fans even in prison, stories and movies about him, got there in the first place by leading a cult and attempting to initiate a racewar, guilty of murder of a family by conspiracy
His continued life was a positive cognitohazard he had already shown willingness to utilize
@zealous garden please type your thoughts! i'll reply later because i have something on rn
I mean say you find "The Beast", someone like Luis Garavito, probably guilty of unspeakable crimes and claims himself to be guilty of more, not many individuals boast a triple digit body count of mostly children
Now he wasn't sentenced to death, but I have a hard time giving water to any argument which suggests he shouldn't have been
Every breath he drew was a disgrace to the breaths he stole, so unless your plan is to extract some value which makes his continued existence not a spit in the face, then you should kill him
In fact you should make it a spectacle. Raise awareness of his atrocity to hinder its recurrence, make an example of the threat, remove the threat
The right kind of spectacle even becomes a producer of capital, rather than a drain
The gladiator game is a hyperbolic conclusion for illustrative purposes, one point being it's not only about the dangers they could pose, and crimes they have comitted, but even what potential good could come from them at this point?
And so from that last angle, we may extract some good even from those who are truly irredeemable
As the biggest argument about the sanctity of life tends to be about its potential, you don't know what kind of leaf a person could turn. It's also why children are often valued, they are typically innocent of wrongdoing, ignorant of many evils, and due to this have a much greater potential to embrace the goods in the world, as well as much more potential in general for their greater plasticity and available time
I do not buy any arguments of "who are we to say who lives or dies", the only ones there are that's who
This is the natural position, the natural embargo.
You make children, you choose life. You hunt, you choose death. You distribute the food from the hunt, you choose life.
But the modern child often doesn't even truly understand that a death is what's responsible for the food on their plate
This leads to a lack of moral culpability for the meal, and further immoralities against your duty to man and nature as an arbiter of life and death
Not because you're special, but because none of us are
This to me is a sentiment that is trying to run away from the reality of living a life as an animal on Earth
This sentiment is a result of realizing I have to share a lonely space rock with monsters that have existed that are too numerous to enumerate
Death is for the irredeemable. For the others, teach them how to be better. For the devils that feel for themselves, show the others like them to keep behaving. It's a survival need
Oh did you decide to read it?
i'll reply tonight, probably in a few hours
Oh no someone said "I ain't reading allat" then deleted their message when I was about to reply
I could say more but I think I started to just wax poetic about my opinion of the function of death and how it's been disrespected by modern life but that's actually mostly disjoint from this topic I think
,iam studying
Gave you the studying! selfrole.

Nobody's reading alla that lil bro šš
1st sentence sounds like a ChatGPT response, then I scroll a lil bit down and see bro talk about death and the devil
I honestly don't know why ppl become "over criminals" in the first place, as in the type of thing you suggest the death penalty for
The devil? Where
Sybau
Huh?
Um nothing
The "I'm not sure what you want me to justify" bit?
I was being dodgy about the intent of my claim being that the death penalty is a moral necessity, and not a literal necessity, as I only said "necessity" in the original post
Which changes the goalpost considerably
Of course you don't literally need the death sentence. It's not like I'll have a heart attack if they cease lethal injection or the chair
Letās solve p np problem
n obviously just equals 1
or p=0
done
QED
@neat lintel here ok?
Yes, If speaking with myself is not considered as a spam. Don't ask me how I came to such conclusion
You know what, I actually tried speaking with myself in one of the servers I visited. They said that it was a spam and I got banned. I don't know what else to do in an empty chat.
My bad for late replying
No need to apolgise I was speaking with myself.
(YES feel misreable)
What I meant was sometimes we donāt see our mistakes or what we did wrong (I understand how you felt that you did nothing wrong) but itās better to see a different perspective on what you did .
To be honest I donāt care what you did in math discussion, but I thought it would be better to help you understand since youāre new here.
So if they mentioned anything you did wrong you could just start again .
Like how Metroid mentioned .
I think you are about to send a very big massage.
I did not see what Metroid said. But I am happy because you are a good person. I hope everyone was like you. And I don't think I will say sorry to anyone though.
Well thatās the benefits of being emotionally intelligent š
#math-discussion message I meant this is what he said
I thought you were a good person since you admitted you were wrong on the conversation you had
I tried speaking about math competition and how the chinses got perfect math scores. But no one engaged with me. whenever I try to speak with someone they just stay silent or ignore me.
Yeah
Itās difficult at the start ,but math discussion is primarily about discussing math related topics , you can discuss here or in #discussion yeah the people there write a lot but you can engage with them and get used to it .
#serious-discussion is more dead š
I have no tomorrow.
I don't mind it.
?
Want to speak about how the Chinese lefted the entire world in the dust?
Tbh , I canāt right now , but youāll eventually find someone better than me!
Yeah, don't worry about it. I think I also draned my social energy. So rejecting this offer was actually the best choice you could do for both of us!
Good luck on your journey here !
Thatās very kind of you to say, I will try my best to reconnect on the server!
ts so true
the water does not become the cup
it does in a poetic sense, it takes on the shape of the cup
it takes on
cups,,,
WAIT
Ah slowmode
What?
Me RN:
cute kitty

wow
thats dms pfp 
oh
,av --server
oppailol. has no server avatar set.

lmao
its only for nitro users
,av oppailol.
Guys you all know about Collatz Theorem

no, not me
sorry i meant Collatz Conjecture *
i feel like u kept this pfp for a year 
Man i have made a fun site called collatz scribbles
where you all can see magic of collatz conjecture on any number (1-10000)
please try and give reviews
it generates a collatz seqyence graph how number ends to 1
So any reviews ?
like any suggestions which you all would love
oh actually sorry guys i have deployed on render
on mobile btw
its like this only the platform is free because
;-;
@warm lance so how do you like it or dont
any improvement suggestion ??
this is version 1.1
any number? are you sure about that?
ok thanks for the review
what would you like me to improve
but ofc it's impressive that you've made smth like this
no any number b/w 1 - 10000
where you all can see magic of collatz conjecture on any number (1-10000)
oh yeah? what about e
the shapes output
noice try typing it
i need to know glitches also
btw, my rating is more on the aesthetic part
okok so like what shapes should i do we have diamond star and circle for nodes
truncates input to 2 using standard integer conversion it seems
i feel like simpler shapes might be better
the form sends input as int(input) thats why
I thought it was something like that
Good aesthetic work
so how do you like it i will fix this in version 1.2
ngl, I've only read like 5 words on the page
i just need reviews
to be honest i don't particularly see the benefit of the ladder visualization
its meant for that
for simplification
in that case great job
@wise bloom Why did you make this website
I'm not reading a damn thing and I'm loving it
don't you have passions?
actually sorry but i have constructed the graph structure through msyelf using networkx
if you want i could change the graph structure
any suggestions are welcome
My passions can be explained a bit
man this was my project or passion making sites for all conjectures
the two i love
goldbach
collatz
you need to enigmamax
this is first in them
@agile fiber so what should be graph structure according to you
Let me know when you're ready to make a site for my conjectures
like for improvement just tell me i would change it definitely
which ones?
lmao
if only if only the woodpecker sighs
i am worried cause like cloud told something like graph structure is not good
Damn bro. Thats really the reason? Not to get better at webdev or something like that?
please tell him to guide which structure he wants
i can change
i have seperate code to generate graph structure only
anyway, i didn't know collatz definition is that simple
@agile fiber which graph structure you want
Most interesting conjecture to ME at the moment is whether every isometry in O(p,q,r) is the composition of at most p+q+2r reflections through hyperplanes
but i forgot
no not possible
man i am not even able to understand lmao
hyperplanes?
Don't worry its esoteric
lmao
we know for certain they are all compositions of some number of reflections
Wraithlord is like a wizard.
Guys one genuine question what would you all like to improve
please tell i am writing it down
I like the UI a lot.
It's good... but... you know...
there's no dark theme
(good work)
emo
man
if i will give dark theme
i feel it would be cooked
cause numbers font and color in the modal graph is black
i have to write something to change it to white then when someone turns it black
affine subspaces of codimension 1
but sure would add
ok i have written dark theme mode
anything else
@agile fiber sir what graph structure should i use
,av
who's the most smug
idk but preferably something where the layout has some meaning about the behavior
please guide
show your collatz cloud lol
well that's already included
but maybe have it go a different direction depending on whether you have a 3n + 1 step vs an n/2 step or something like that
oh
man i was like thinking to show a sequential graph
could you like be more specific
if possible
like this
we can do like this but we have sites for this right already ??
and like it shows distribution among steps right?
like this ?
man general people would not be able to understand
i was thinking to keep it as fun site
i mean after reading the definition (which i forgot) the graph makes sense now
,w collatz conjecture
Hello there
Hello
Hey
How are you bro?
fine buddy hows going
.....
All good.
silly goobers right here



Can anyone teach me how to make some money? i need money
get a job
Wok at McDonald's
or if u got some talent maybe create a yt channel
that's probably not a good idea
why r there two discussions
you sir are a genius
to get bored twice
huh
nvm you dont know the reference
bc #discussion is always weird these days
i hope same doesnt happen w this
yk even if you make a road wider to speed up traffic it will still get congested by time
true
Send a complicated statement that takes days to understand
It was originally created as an overflow
discussion can only handle like 6 simultaneous conversations at once
optimally should, usually does or is only capable of
?
Only capable of
dam
anyway
ill come in some timeeating dinner
so chat bye for now
also preboards in two weeks š
vegeta is bald
are u 10th grade gang?
@rose ridge i saw u..

Do you read manhwas?
even in mangas idk why thats a thing
i mostly read chinese webnovels and its pretty rare and they dont describe it vividly
Yeah i love heaven officials blessing
i have it saved lol
ill read it soon
have u read
grandmaster of demonic cultivation?>
Yeaa
the novel or manhwa?
Mc and ml are so beautifully drawn in manhwa version
Both
its so rare to come across a person that has
what about renegade immortal, reverend insanity, lord of the mysteries, shadow slave, pursuit of truth, i shall tear the heavens?
thousand autumns?
I heard of them but haven't read them yet
i sort of like how chinese translates into english
its very simple, easy to read and elegant at the same time
I want to learn chinese because it's so interesting
What languages do u speak?
Yeah when translators are good but i have read some very bad translations you want to bush your head in
Oh fuck i forgot about that
brainrot translation
i will be learning it next year
i wld start now but im tryna get into programming
Sybau
who invited you
Sybau dawg š„
silence it, ignoramus hippopotymus
What in the harry potter
You shall speak when you're spoken to
NOOO POOR KIMTY
Have u read lotm
Sybau
,av 1331405779722305599
cute car
You're not the Queen
Nope
Sorry wrong person
I've just heard about it i guess
Have u read LoTM
I wasnt tryna be rude mb š
I genuinely replied to the wrong person
Sybau kid
some parts ill finish later
pls shut the fuck up
Fair fair I'm just cooler maybe your instincts kicked in
Have u ever joined any lotm servers
no ew
It's so silent here it's perfect
:3
:3
Everywhere needs a little :3

:3
:3
You guys what are ya doing besides studying ?
Wondering what the hell is happening to me, hbu?
For me I am watching a video in YouTube š
Nice :3
jes
Hi
Some people reacting over all Pixar shorts šš because I love a lot animation tbh, so I just watch anything interesting
I am new here
nice
And I usually like their commentary
hi
Hai ! There ! Welcome to the Mathcord !
Thank you ^_^
who even r u
man if yk igcse the board atl in gr 10 it gives you EIGHT subs
š
and i dont even like a fair lot of em
theres maths (goated, tho ez)
igcse NOT relatable gang
thank god it isnt
yea no theres maths and the three sciences that i do good in
Do ik u?
no?
but then
and i dont either lol
Ok then shush
even if u dont
ur not even active
i suck at managing time in writing
das crazy
āFor me, this module is interesting so i need
āStudy it in very detail
I haven't reached this stage yet
icic
Do you have some good books?
what degree
ya im currently using it for my course š
Can you sent it to me
I really need it
I didn't find any detailed book
its called digital principles by roger l. tokheim, i can share u the pdf in dms if u want
biomedical engineering
Share it please
done
is physical chemistry super imp for u
imo the book is helpful since it shows a lot good exercises
u should definitely check em
i havent taken physical chem yet
and i dont think ill do this in my degree 
I don't think you'll need chem for biomedical engineering
ya
there is a course im gonna take for 2nd year and its called medical terminology
Im cs
which books?
theres thousands bro š
fair
Unfortunately, the professors who teach us have no connection to this domain
all the best 
im sure ur referring to biomedical science 
recommend me some good books from ur library
only if you're good at keeping secrets
secrets? im probably good at this (maybe)
friend req send
should i try leaving myself at some random door to be adopted?
Twin take me with you
hi
this?
Bruh 3h later

0 10sec timeout :D
I thought people were intelligent enough to just switch from discussion one to #2 šš
I know a few servers with a main discussion (with cool-down) and a second discussion (without cool-down) and weirdly this is a universal trend
It's too much work 
discussy the second is great for being calm
Truly wonderful

im told this department is way better
on a completely unrelated note has anyone seen the island
The one where there are people who are cloned just for their body parts?
that one
am i on the island here in discussy2?
where can i learn a-level AS further maths conent, im only just starting
Yo
Is anyone here into investing and investments ?
I think many people are into investing now
Which is a good indicator that market is overvalued
Eh, it's pretty hard to find with a 1 in 65536 chance to become visible
Yo I did further maths let's talk in private
@royal tangle im sorry for behaving like that. i got lost af and lost the mood to continue the convo. trust me, i know how annoying i got to a point
and sorry for tagging ya
gotta go detox
go take a break, its easy to make mistakes in the heat of the moment
make your messages count, theyre there forever
usually when things dont go the right way for me, I try to go back and figure out what went wrong
so Ill propose something that maybe you can chew on
so far, youve proven that (n choose i) sums to 2^n
and youve noticed that 2^n = |P(A)|
but since we cant use the weird proof that that is true, youll need to prove that 2^n and |P(A)| are the same a different way
informally, we can expect that they must be the same, but even informally, youve just said "this 2^|A| I got is probably |P(A)|, Ive read a weird line about it but its hard to remember it even being true"
(its probably that A^B notation to denote functions from B to A, its weird as hell to get used to)
so if you want to, informally or otherwise, write a proof to show that 2^n = |P(A)|, youll need to use something involving what we can trust, what we know
already we've proven (n choose i) sums to 2^n, what about a different way of viewing (n choose i) that allows them to also sum to |P(A)|?
you likely were going to head in this direction, I was pointing out that youd need to mention this
that way, you are essentially proving:
|P(A)| = ā (n choose i) = 2^n
^ this ^ (6i) did this
so that finally |P(A)| = 2^n
informal or otherwise, youll need to show that first equals sign is correct if you head in this direction
you're right. i didn't exactly mention it, but i was gonna go along the lines of: "we first choose 0 elements of A, then we choose 1, then 2... then n, and summing them all together results in 2^n". and i mentioned a hypothetical like "what if we were asked to prove |P(A)| in the final exams?" . I wondered if it would be sufficient as a proof to just say what i said in the first quotation marks, having proven the sum of n choose i
yes there we go, you hadnt mentioned that in your P2
I first said that you shouldve
informally? Id believe it, and for a reason unique to this statement
this is a common method of proving that |P(A)| = 2^n
the idea of |P(A)| and 2^n are so similar that the respective proofs would be extremely close
now sure youre not doing induction here since its informal, but if I saw this Id agree its a solid approach
now if we were to do this formally, I dont think you need that induction actually
even in a final exam?
in a final exam, formal only
informal means like you ask someone after the exam on whether an approach works or not
and they, and I, go "yep"
formally, you could just begin with "there are (n choose k) subsets with exactly k elements"
then reason then that since every subset has between k=0 and k=n elements,
there are (n choose 0) + ... + (n choose n) subsets
or 2^n subsets
i see
doesnt this mean x is real such that x is greater than 0
yea it does
you could just get away with {x > 0} or really (0, ā)
but sometimes the > symbol is more than just greater than
so its good to be specific
tbh I wouldnt, Id just go with "positive"
if the question was asked like this: "prove that |P(A)| = 2^(|A|) via induction." could i use the method you just showed me? it still counts as induction right?
i dont get how saying the domain of sqrt(x) is xā¬R:x>=0 shouldnt it be sqrt(x)ā¬R:x>=0
because why are we saying x itself is real
now that is where the methods differ, there is in fact an easier method (also using induction) that proves this more directly
the left side tells you what set x is in
the right side tells you conditions on this x
ohh
so the right side is supposed to limit x in R to be "all the x in R that fit thse conditions"
makes sense
i mean the proof with n choose k is literally 3 lines long tho
its just that saying āsuch thatā makes it sound different
well you do need to then insert the original (n choose i) proof
that bumps it up a few lines
i see
now if we just prove that theyre equal directly with induction, the proof would definitely be shorter
heres a common way:
oh i think im just bad at english lmao
i didnt filly undersyand what such that meant
i thought such that meant āthis is true only if this conditionā
let B be A with an extra element b, so |B| = |A| + 1
then note that there are 2^|A| subsets that have b, and 2^|A| subsets that do not have b
so they add to show that |P(B)| = 2^|A| + 2^|A| = 2^|B|
its good to search the logical definitions in maths because they will remain the same. if you get one of them wrong, youll be doing the wrong maths until you correct it
yup
the specific words you choose matter more and more as you move forward in math
just misinterpreted the english
how do we just know that there are 2^|A| subsets that have b ...? i cant even think of why this is true, let alone prove it
well put it this way
we already can count all the subsets of A
now consider a function that just inserts the element b in there
keep in mind |B| = |A| + 1, so this element b must be different from all other elements of A
(otherwise |B| = |A|)
so youre still counting the exact same subsets as before, just with an extra element at the end that is always there, or alternatively always not there
in either case, the count remains the same
Im not sure to what extent you need to formally explain this
it might just be enough to point this out, then state the subset line
how do we arrive at 2^|A| tho?
lol
itd be better to have the inductive hypothesis be more general of "any set with n elements"
so that B would be a set with n + 1 elements
the inductive hypothesis of "any set with n elements has 2^n subsets"
this is def not easier to understand




