#study-discussion
1 messages Ā· Page 11 of 1
Hm okay
So then yes this makes sense in any euclidean ordered field
How fun, it goes hand in hand with Sylvesters Law of Inertia
I have no idea what that is š
Sylvester's?
ye
Hmm
I haven't done qudratic forms and all that yet
I think of it as a classification of metric vectorspaces over euclidean closed fields, you can equivalently think of it as (and it is usually introduced as) a classification of symmetric bilinear forms / quadratic forms up to change of basis
It says that two Inner products are equivalent iff they have the same maximum positive dimension, negative dimension, and degenerate dimension
Or in other words if the corresponding matrices have the same numbers of positive, negative, and null eigenvalues
It is what allows us to unambiguously refer to R^3,1 or R^4,2
As long as your field is ordered and every positive number is a square (Euclidean Ordered Field), you have Sylvester's Law of inertia
Ordered fields are needed for CS obviously
yup
Next, the IP <v,v> only gives you |v|^2 in F, so you need the root of <v,v> (or its negative) to actually exist in F in order to actually define |v|
Is there a book you are using for your class?
If you don't have roots like this, then you get more inner products for each equivalence class of scalars that differ by a factor of some square scalar
So [a]={x| exists k s.t. x=ak^2}
I want more references for this topic
Halmos
FDVS
Based
fr why would google use ai to find a better matrix multiplication algorithm after 55 years
AI managed to solve an unsolved math problem, meh doesn't matter
obviously /j
if ai can solve problems that have been unsolved for 5 decades it seems pretty obvious why people are using ai for math
It's idk
it kills the act of thinking
pondering
Most people can't think anyway
its increases my act of productive thinking
Because i use it to do menial things like lateX. i have more time to actually think of the math
yea, no, I know people who use it for hints/ proof check assignments
it's allowed by the prof, but feels bad
why I can't understand anything in here?
also them using ai and still doesn't makes sense
Ok but if u use ai you dont have to do it like that, u can use ai for math in a way that works for you
Its a false dichotomy that u either never use ai or use it for everything
more often than not, i let it explain terms to me that ive forgotten
Thats another great use of ai, recalling things u forgot
im against the overuse of it, but i think since ai is a thing now and nobody can escape the usage of it, we might aswell use it in a beneficial way
I dont understand how people think googling a definition you forgot isnt an issue but chatgpting a definition you forgot is « killing your thinking », either both are killing ur thinking or neither are lol
lmao literally one way or another
chatgpt unifies the definitions for me which i like and to ensure it isnt giving me anything false, ill always review the definitions it gives
ai is not all bad in math!
Id go further and say its great, ucla professor used gpt5 pro the other day to generate the main idea behind advancing an open optimization problem
That's easy. gpt explains too much
how remarkable (and somewhat terrifying) is that 
U can just prompt it to be concise lol or more easily in the settings of gpt set the default to be concise
can you set a token limit
Because one can hallucinate and lie and give you false definitions while the other, while more manual, is generally a bit more reliable. Ofcourse the nost reliable way is to find a book or paper where the object you see is first defined and use that instead
<@&268886789983436800> scambot
Is it ? Depends on what u use it for. For mvc for instance gpt + reasoning made maybe 2-3 mistakes out of 500 questions+ i put in
For algebra it hallucinated quite a lot
But for just plugging in definitions ive never seen it make a mistake, it halkucinates on problem solving and stuff
hallucinate and lie in problem solving for sure! it is not reliable at all in that sense (for now
). but in terms of definitions, itās able to unify many many textbook definitions into whatever type of explanation you need, whether it be simple and concise, or long and rigorously explained. just to be on the safe side you can always āfeedā it the information you donāt quite understand and have it explain it to you to ensure it does not pull something out of its ass lol
@scenic shuttle i work full time and study math degree in part time
i understand itās more of an ethical/moral dilemma than anything, but i donāt think the rep it gets is deserved
that still doesnāt answer my question
my fault
@glacial raven
Well the bigger issue is the format of the response. Google results (in the old days) typically force your brain to still be halfway on as you sift through the results to decipher actual statements. The AI will just feed you those statements which may still need to be fact checked, encouraging autopilot
@scenic shuttle i am studying calculus 2, plane trigonometry part 1 by sl loney, statistics 1 and elements by Euclid
im changing my mind
About what
its just i have already studied calculus before and im self-studying real analysis so i dont need it when i already know it also i dont need stats either

What did you change your mind about I mean, it doesn't seem obvious to me from what I see of chat
about this #study-discussion message
basically a study group
algebraic geometry
How much do high performance students in mathematics self study per day?
My study hours fluctuate between 1 to 3 hours a day depending on my energy levels, but that just doing seem enough for my goals
easily geometric algebra
Geometric algebra š£ļø
define "high performance" and are you early/late undergrad
High performance := students in World top 10 institutions with near perfect grades
I'm 2nd year undergrad in uk
no idea which 10 you mean
im in my 1st year and i did about 1h of work a day for university outside of classes? but my finals are coming up and i have a project to submit for a grad class so that's 8h now
How do you push to 8h?!
i think that's why i have a fever rn HAHA
just need to make it through one week and it'll be okay (lies i tell myself)
if it weren't for that one module it would be 1h a day, and mostly on my psych/writing class
doesnt this also depend on number of modules and what the content is
Hmm, so I asked one Cambridge student online and apparently 5 hours a day consistently is pretty high performance even among his uni. I just don't think that's attainable āš¤Æš¤
cambridge!! what year, i might know a few y1s
Idk his year. Might be yr3 or 4
oh okie
I guess I'll just keep grinding until I can do 4 hours consistently
why does time even matter so much to you
Because I'm really behind. I kinda came to maths late (technically just took a gap year for rehabilitation)
So there's a lot to catch up on
why does time seem to matter more than content for you
what topics
I've started abstract algebra and multivariable calculus. But for a second year student in uk that seems eh...
Content does matter. But I'm also from a third world country so I kinda need scholarships. Makes me very desperate to get ahead
you get ahead by learning the content better and faster than other people
Hmm, I thought I just put in more hoursš§
anyone can put in more hours but what are you putting in those hours šš
I usually just spend my whole day self studying from a textbook until my brain is fried
Soo, just regular self study. What everyone else does I guess
Everyone is different. I feel my priorities lie with grades and intellectual curiosity rather than, idk, partying? Though I love partying š
We had a party for my highschool cohort when we were graduating. Went to Vietnam and stuff. Very funš
cool!!!
dm?
Sureš
Fire emoji
It's not about quantity, but rather about the quaility
Unfortunately i am not at this level so i cannot answer
But neamesis is
Why necessarily top 10 institutuons ?
I feel like a top student outside of em can di very well ir is often better
I guess the top 10 part was arbitrary. I just wanted to compare myself to the kind of student I want to be
Just be more talented fr
Become gauss
How does bro not like partying
My thinking is that the amount you actually learn per day is quality times quantity, but the quality part has diminishing returns after a while.
So really I'm just trying to maximize how much I can do per day without burning out
Bro is spitting facts šš¤Æ
There is no need to compare yourself to me
Comparison is the thief of joy
I do get this concern a lot (thank you for the kindness š), but I feel like I am enjoying myself a lot
The tension between enjoying the process and working towards a goal is something I feel a lot of students face. In my case there isn't much of a tension there anymore
Number one in obesity
not from a top uni, but ~ 10 hours
a lot of it is just thinking though
not actively studying
just pondering
sketching examples
Quantity also has diminishing returns after a while
Ideally the active work will be like 2 hours per day
the rest will be passive but intensive pondering
how you doing ?
Extremely bad
:(
Had a kind of fun , but simple problem you may like
Life is looking up ( in other words funally getting a ton of marks in RA)
Let's go š„
And my assignments are fun at last
one example of a problem I had ( this has been graded)
find all cont functions from R to R st f(f(x))=-x
Bro is not stopping until he is a professor at oxford fr
hi
I have my Arabic midterm in 12 hours from now is it better to sleep then study for a few hours before I go to school or study rn then sleep and go to school
There are so many definitions to be memorized and studied
Algebra midterm in half an hour 
Rings Z[sqrt(d)] are something, any tricks for factoring
I know about the norm
Get proper sleep. If you wake up early, spend the morning doing something relaxing.
N(a + b sqrt(d)] = a^2 - d b^2
that's about as good as it gets lmao
Fair
i find some people care more about where they're studying rather than actually pursuing knowledge
Yes literally me
thats horrible
Ur mom
i have a 76 in math am i cooked midterms are realeased tmmrw can i have a academic comeback
If you can't do the math yourself to determine if you are cooked, you probably are cooked
r u planning going to top school or something?
bc that doesnāt look bad
what strategies do people use for comprehending and noting whats important when reading prose parts of books? i usually try to categorize sentences into "statements" and "comments" based on whether they introduce new ideas or if they expand on / relate previous ideas, and from there i try to connect the lines so they make sense to myself, but im curious how other people approach this
also regarding note taking, ive been experimenting with it a lot and at the moment i dont make many notes of what i read as an exercise in mentally sorting information, usually only taking notes to follow along definitions and proofs, but im also curious how people approach this
if you mean math books i pretty much only follow proofs
yea math books
but you should not trust me with logistics!! ive only been in university for almost a semester
something helpful imo is after you read a section, close a book, and make a concept map of everything you remember from that section (important definitions, theorems that connect them or motivate them, etc.), then you can go back and see if there's any crucial material that you missed
I don't personally do this super often but I think that it helps when I do
this channel is for advice about studying, so this post is off-topic for this channel

what would the correct channel for acad related rants be
uhh I don't know, probably any of the casual discussion channels
not this one though
Noted
I mean #advanced-lounge is for discussing academic life no?
I forgot that existed
ā ļø
I do this (or at least try to)
For the prose part, I just read what's written, if I don't understand it, then I pull out a paper and a pencil and try to make sense of what they meant, and/or ask someone
this may not be an answer to your questions but i recommend that you try proving the theorems/propositions alone before looking at the proof given by the author
The less obvious a statement is, thatās a good sign that something is going on
If you donāt see how to prove it, something might be going on
And developing an idea for āshapes of argumentsā can be good
Like, āI wouldnāt have thought of this statement, but BCT + and open and closed argument would do itā even if you donāt immediately see the details
Since the shapes of arguments are sometimes the rhetorical conceit of books
Like, the point sometimes is to write proofs for the argument more than the statement
3Blue1Brown is currently making a series of videos explaning how the Laplace Transform works
3blue1brown when he meets 3brown1blue
anybody know any place with exercises on diferencial calculus, or places that actually have free exercises instead of paying
Beleive the truth that has bourbaki
formalism ,
Math=meaningless game of symbols with rules .
not just in math but in everything , Have knowledj and work .
Know to work with it and work to know more and dont work until you know .
Knowledj is demonstrated truth beleives , you should proove things to beleive them .
Study actively and work the demonstration and exemples of textbook .
Search to know the work of others and add the knowledj of others to yours like it was said maybe by da vinci :"by listening you will have minds of others "
to have a community of people's knowledj inside yourself ,in any thing search contribution and the work of others .
who are you talking to?
All.
even ignoring skepticism (like Descartes), which you will have to acknowledge in your argument, you cannot operate day-to-day without believing things that you don't have absolute certainty in. for instance, when you get out of bed in the morning, I imagine you don't verify that the floor is still there, despite the fact that you cannot be certain that it is
Here is a set of practice problems to accompany the Differentials section of the Applications of Derivatives chapter of the notes for Paul Dawkins Calculus I course at Lamar University.
,help
A brief description and guide on how to use me was sent to your DMs!
Please use ,list to see a list of all my commands, and ,help cmd to get detailed help on a command!
<@&268886789983436800>
thanks micose
Mico the group birb when she meets mico the ring birb
I murdered it
What about the field birb, the vector space birb, the module birb, the category birb, the semigroup birb, and the monoid birb
are they all dead too?
all in the same murder!
Well yāknow what they say
Kill 7 birds with one stone
This implies they're all crows
You are so mean micose
but uh also enough of this discussion, this is #study-discussion
I wonder about a reverse kind of way of approaching things. Like you find a topic that is interesting, and then fill in the details of concepts needed to understand that topic. or, perhaps a mix of both that and a standard sequence of topics going on too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coxeter_group this looks super interesting to me for example. What might be the concepts needed to understand that. although, sometimes maybe in the process of exploring a standard sequence you might find something you would have never found if you didn't survey what's there first. so maybe both at the same time kind of.
In mathematics, a Coxeter group, named after H. S. M. Coxeter, is an abstract group that admits a formal description in terms of reflections (or kaleidoscopic mirrors). Indeed, the finite Coxeter groups are precisely the finite Euclidean reflection groups; for example, the symmetry group of each regular polyhedron is a finite Coxeter group. Ho...
Like, while taking a standard sequence of classes, you have a few subjects that you study towards kind of like that too.
Maybe you haven't taken abstract algebra yet, but coxeter groups look super cool, so you study a bit on groups to get an idea.
Sometimes I wonder if having something like that which you study towards can provide a context for more deeply understanding something, than just studying something by itself without that context. At least you could revisit it later on if you don't fully understand it. I wonder if some subjects could be introduced much earlier on in the curriculum like that. Linear Algebra and concepts from Abstract Algebra, for example.
It certainly works, quite a few of my friends have their own side projects and so they learn a lot of math outside the curriculum
For eg if you think counting integer points in polyhedra is cool you can look at the text "counting the continuous discretely", its fairly accessible
Or if you like twisty puzzles
Theres the book "Adventures in Group Theory: Rubik's Cube, Merlin's Machine, and Other Mathematical Toys" by Joyner
Is openstax good for learning calculus?
It took me like a whole month to get through half of the first lesson of the first unit in volume one on my own, because I forgot all the algebra I learned in school
I used to learn a lot of algebra in my old school outside the US, but to me it was just transformations of values and variables but in my current high school I feel like a real mathematician thatās discovering key facts about the properties that make up objects around us such as how to find the area or volume of an object around you even if itās quadratic
Secret tip: Basically every bloody calculus book is the same in order, pacing, and soemtimes even problems
The only difference is gonna be in explanations, but even those don't vary a lot
I like Thomas, one of my friends like stewart, but both books teach integration theory fine, for example
It's not like one book covers a bunch of super esoteric or different stuff than another, you haven't reached the parts of maths where it matters yet
Like eventually yes, books will start to matter because they not only cover material differently but they also cover outright different material, or they approach constructions or whatever from completely different ways
RE: shifting and scaling functions, there's a section in Stewart's Precalculus (or actually most precalc books) that describes the general process
https://www.stitz-zeager.com/Precalculus4.pdf chapter 5 of stitz zeager, for example, covers it
oooooooo
I believe this is also covered in strang's openstax book or any of the openstax precalc resources too
Niceeeee
oooo
Oh my god u cs majors
meals are such an inconvenience when im studying
I like meals, they taste good and they give me energyš„
I'm a fan of eating but not a fan of cooking š¤
i shouldnt eat anyway
how do you do work consistently, idk why im procrastinating again
I try to train myself like an athlete. E.g. when you take a break it's not really a good idea to do nothing for more than 10 minutes, because a break is supposed to be a reset, not a distraction
I also like the idea that consistency is just continuous momentum. You're not trying to force yourself to work, you slowly build up that momentum and then keep doing what's natural
I don't
I procrastinate for 3 months, and then during the end of the semester I panic and curse myself for wasting all the time I had 
while frantically trying to learn enough material to pass the exams 
Next semester that will change š£ļøš„ because I'm already changing it a bit
Does anyone have any advice for actually studying/learning maths? I haven't found anything which has worked for me this year, i.e. what I mean is
do you take notes during lecs? Do you handwrite and then type up notes in latex? What are you doing through the week? Do you aim for finishing every tutorial/tutorial question? Idk something like that, like the actual process
Is it ok to do math if you're not a math major?
I just can't afford it man...
If you do math without being a math major the government will fine you 10000$
Anyone caught reading math will be sent to jail for 15 years
Where u live ?
I'm js scared if anyone at University see me doing math.. they'll make fun of me š
Call me nerd and idk what not ...
Yeah its true there are people walking around uni just looking for people studying math so they can attack and make fun of them
And at home there's just too much noise to concentrate
Only at night I can do it....
I mean I have friends who could do that yk š
Our major is software engineering
Bros major is unemployment
They just make wrappers around the true rigor they mistake verbosity for depth
That maybe true
I mean they might get jealous that I'm doing it and not them?
People who dont know you wont give a shit
If ur worried about ur friends just study away from them
Wb the bozos who do?
Then I'll be l...left alone?
People dont randomly walk up to someone theyve never seen in their life and make dun if them first studying math
Good
Damn is it?
If ur reading a math book you dont need 10 people to keep you company
If anything it is distracting
Rn I'm trying to construct
a^n - b^n
Yes for sureee
Not even that I'm just working on a problem and I need silence
I guess I gotta grow up and stop thinking what others have to think about me
Dw regardless of what u do ull be unemployed with software engineering degree
I mean I just want to solve problems... It's easy for me to get a job anyway but I don't wanna work in software industry
Do you find it difficult to self study from books or just keeping up with lectures?
hi
is that the
a²-b² = (a+b)(a-b) thing?
Because it's also being populated by react Andy's and there's no point in making more LLM wrappers tho bozo employers still pay for that shi
I mean the trick to this is to fully schedule time to go the grocery store and time to cook
and also cook larger batches
also don't be afraid to mix and match premade vs cooked things (for example, premade frozen dumplings + a salad you made yourself)
I think everyone should own a slow cooker / crock pot
there's an entire genre of "dump and go" recipes for that where you quite literally throw all the ingredients into the thing in the morning
let it go for 8, 10 hours on low
come home and food is ready (plus these are quite big, so you have dinner for the next 3-4 days)
I do this all the time
I haven't tried these in particular but if you want basic I think this would be a good place to start: https://www.reddit.com/r/slowcooking/comments/1ks4ff/6_ingredients_or_less_v30/
if you look up slow cooker chicken tinga on Youtube, there's this channel Internet Shaquille whose recipe I've made like 4 times (but it's a little more involved)
we should move this convo to #1207415626381918309 so ping me there if you have more questions
the slow cooking sub is a good sub tho
<@&268886789983436800>
Hmmm, a bit of both, really. My only problem with textbooks is like, wtf do I do if I don't understand a certain part
depends on what topic
sometimes vids helps more than just using a textbook
hmm well I'm in undergrad sooo coming up to number theory/analysis 2/Lin alg
icic
well maybe doing some research outside of textbook might help u understand the part
books or papers
How do I know what to black box and what not to when learning math
Probably the best way initially is to have people who know what you can just black box tell you
Hm Iām self-studying algtop atm though
Surely you have access to people who have studied algtop before, you could ask them
hmā¦
I guess I have some friends from undergrad who did
At the office Iām mostly around physicists
could also ask in the relevant subject channel
There is also this cool server called the math server where you can find a bunch of topologists 
wowwowowowo whats it called
Guess
sorry should have added a sarcasm/joking tag, my apologies
Is it humanely possible to cram for 2 midterms within this hour
No I just had an incredibly busy day yesterday so when I came back home I just crashed š
Iām so cooked i think Iāll just prioritize one and let the other rot
U are actually a genius
Iām crediting you
The only thing you can do is just review the stuff you think you know
Just walk through that, or go through your old problems that you know how to solve. Say what was tricky, and how you can remember to avoid making mistakes
Word okay Iām about to head in school I can study in break
what works for me whenever i have to cram, which i donāt like to, but it can happen, is to create a practice exam and take it
youāll quickly identify what problems you struggle with and then you can quickly log it in your mind before the exam, but just make sure to study those concepts after the exam
how to study it, capture big picture of how itās relevant and connects with past ideas, then practice the problems
probably a good thing to keep a set of flashcards of the main points of each concept and then building a few practice problems to redo throughout the week, maybe for breakfast or dinner 
Oh this is actually a great suggestion cause I can use the worksheets and assignments my teachers upload like as my practice exams basically
Idk how but god genuinely saved me cause I did well on both (I should have not) and it was such a close call that Iām never letting happen again šš
Guys does anyone have any specific methods/advice for studying. I study atleast 20 hours for each test, practice problems, make sure i understand the question, every trick i know but still do badly. I need to study more effectively but dont know how. Im in first year uni for science also
what topics are you currently learning
any tips on reducing basic arithmetic mistakesā¦
somehow thought -14-4 was -28 and took me a long time to spot the mistake
it just gets better the more u do?
its becoming a common issue in all my papers and its really bothering me
im in uni and i lost >15% of my practical to two off-by-one errors, it happens 
Chem bio math
What do you think is better for self-taught calculus learning: Stewart's book, MIT OpenCourseWare, or should I combine them (though I think that might be more time-consuming and I don't really know how to do it)?
is this pre-uni? if so i found it useful to go over mechanisms for chem and bio
no idea what math topics you're learning though
No im in first year UNI
is it similar to AP chem/bio topics
Yes thats what i heard even tho i never took ap
the above probably still applies
(i took AP Chem and did bio olympiad, never got anywhere with bio though)
What about math
idk whats first year math
ive heard everything from precalc to abstract algebra/multivariable/complex analysis
so what math are you doing
what trouble are you having w calc
It was easy in highschool but uni derivatives is way harder flor sum reason
Application
I can dl all the easy questions obviously but when it comes to a type of question iv never seen i get it wrong
do you have examples
I'm learning calc 1 to š„ŗ
An optimization problem i struggled w yesterday: find the greatest area of a rectangle u can fit under the parabola 9-x^2 and over the x axis
I understand what to do now bit i wouldve never thought of that on a test
Hi everyone, I'm actually a freshman in medical school, there is no math anymore, but I want to become an absolute beast in mathematics, what topics should I study first, how/where can I study those subjects
how much math did you do in premed?
I'm in Belgium so I went straight from highschool to medschool
I think I have a solid base in Calculus, I learned integrals, basic calculus and conic sections
and the fundamentals
<@&268886789983436800> channel advertizing
Yeah, please don't do that.
Hmm, I'd say that depends if it was a math book or not. (And in any case clear it with ModMail first, to avoid miscommunication).
so it seems you're in about the position of someone who would otherwise start university in math, meaning you could (if you wanted to) find courses at roughly those levels and just follow them
which is probably advisable compared to just getting a book and reading (at least at the start), because there'll be a bit more structure
so things like MIT OCW and looking up course syllabi at nearby universities is a reasonable idea, if there's subjects you want to pursue first you might ask here or some other place for specific recommendations
starting with university level calculus, linear algebra, and learning to think about proofs is probably the first place to start though
Okayw appreciate it š
The YouTube channel āThe math sorcererā has some awesome vids and tips for studying. Hope that helps. In multiple videos he shares a lot of great points.
Iād just search āmath sorcerer studyā on YouTube and some of them will come up for you. One tip he shares is using a timer that is not based on your phone or laptop - to avoid distractions and help you focus 100% on math. Another tip was being in comfortable environment in general. Thereās much more but those are a couple I remember off the top of my head. @opaque jungle
have any of you guys used obsidian for your notes or anything else in your studies? ive never really taken notes before in hs and college but want to try out and am unsure whats the best method
also do you guys prefer lecture first then the textbook section or vice versa
Maybe just ignore the last year or so
Do you mean ignore the last year or so of his content? Iām pretty new to mathematics and his channel so idk what the shift would have been in his content if thatās what you mean but what Iāve seen has been helpful
tried obsidian but not a fan
to me the main utility of notes is extending my brain memory with paper and working through things while i think about it
i rarely if ever look at my notes again after i write them
I've never used obsidian, I do use TeX though. And I recommend it, the learning curve really isn't that bad
Kind of a nutjob
with obsidian i feel like you spend way too much time actually setting things up for it to be worth it
learning tex is good but i prefer taking notes by hand
Me too. I find that writing things down helps me remember them, and I only reread my notes like the night before a final to refresh my memory.
holy shit, he somehow looks so much more unhinged shaved
It is quite easy to fall into that yeah. That's why the best tip to start is really just to start writing and only change like fundamental stuff when you actually think you need it
Loch what did you use to write up solutions to psets?
Or don't be a luzer and use LaTeX like a good
bachelor i did it by hand, masters i started doing it in latex
Gotcha
except for some drawings...
good way to learn latex but overall not sure it was worth it
Should have spent an hour tikzing it smh
i should
its not too bad
but i think i only took 3 or so "normal classes" during masters
Do yāall think I got a calculator that is sufficient for even the higher levels of mathematics? I got the Casio FX-9750GIII - I am nowhere near ready for anything proof-based or even calculus right now but Iām wondering if I made the right choice as opposed to the TI-84+ which was about $55-60 more
New to the discord nice to meet you all šš«”
this should be fine for pretty much anything
besides, you won't need any calculator for anything proof-based really
Oh okay, I appreciate the insight. And that makes sense, from what I understand that goes more into the logic and argumentation so I can see why the calculator isnāt really needed since it isnāt so much ācomputationalā anymore - if Iām understanding correctly š§
This is why I kinda gave up on it. I wanted to get into it this sem ahead of having to write my diss because I found in my UG project I was having a hard time to stay organised with all the papers I read and stuff, which obsidan seems perfect for. But like the learning curve to set things up is steep and I just dont know if its worth the effort
Plus I like to take hand written notes sometimes and the writing on ipad is a mess
i usually end up more focused on the formatting of my notes and the organization of it all than actually learning the content so i feel like hand written notes done without care for how they look might be a better choice for me
how do i learn how to study lmao
wait really
my obsidian required barely any setup
yeah, I don't remember much setup at all š¤ I just downloaded it and started typing
how do you force yourself to do things consistently
a lot of things i look forward to but cant get myself to attend or write a submission for when it comes down to it
This actually isn't that bad of an idea you could get a friend to also Zelle you when they slip or something so it'll break even in theory lol
But as far as actually understanding yourself and your psychology, I think translating things you enjoy intrinsically to external motivation is not good in the long run
It's hard to separate since the world is so performance-focused. You basically have to be extrinsically motivated by things like grades and job prospects etc. But if you genuinely want to do something, try to tap into why, and that might help you want to do it more
It's hard because we're so primed toward extrinsic motivation that sometimes it doesn't feel worth doing something like studying when there's no longer a grade or money attached
everyone pay Chipper when they slip
brilliant
Ladies and gentlemen, I have been rejected from the master's program in pure mathematics.

you have to make an effort to put links into documents and this informs even overall formatting decisions
after all, if i only wanted separate files, i have no real reason to use obsidian
Is putting links into documents that much effort?
besides, i never gained anything from those links or the graph view really
you might want more meta formatting, which becomes work
also it feels like it wants you to add lots of fluff writing (and write like a Wikipedia article) to get more cross links
never got anything out of that personally š¤·
for me i didn't need this
the linking came quite naturally to me
hi, iām looking for some advice on study methods. for anyone who uses ai tools to study for midterms or tests (anything except math or physics ā in my experience itās really bad at those), how effective have you found them?
for my specific topic, iām studying cabt material for my biomed course, and my professor recommended that i use ai to prepare for next weekās midterm. but iāve noticed it sometimes gives me a headache or makes it harder to focus. is it just me doing something wrong, or is the professor just getting replaced with ai? how do you use ai in a way that actually supports your studying rather than overwhelming you? i really donāt like using ai because it makes me feel dumb. any advice is appreciated
is this a shitpost
no
your professor needs to be guillotined
what advice can you give 
my prof literally makes the midterm from using ai
has to be rage bait
oh man i cant understand today's brainrot words these days
depends on how he uses it. If he tells the ai its correct at the end of the message then it will automatically be correct
make it your slave
on it
you would be surprised to learn my uni has a course dedicated to vibecoding and profs encourage AI for projects
i think many people i know would have an aneurysm seeing this
wtf are doing with education
I generally use it when I have difficulty in memorizing and tell it to make a mnemonic,since medicine is all about memorizing.
Donāt know if you have stuff to memorize.
But in your case you could tell it to give you a way to memorize an equation or steps for example.
It helps a lot because if I feel sometimes the provided mnemonic is difficult ,I tell it to give me another one.
Iteration till I find a good one š
Ah awesome. A course dedicated to QA and debugging. It's about time they introduced that.
You can use AI for studies indirectly, no need for solving since it could provide erroneous answers.
By indirectly I mean study methods:
Like ask it to give you a list of methods to approach for example a problem containing this and that .
Or ways to memorize (story,mnemonic,real life application,connection etcā¦.).
cabt requires a little bit memorizing I think. I have some notes for it but I google them to understand the question. I have an anatomy class in 3rd year and I already know how the class will be, like you said memorizing. I will avoid ai for this and just use online sources for now š
I tried something like this before and it didn't help at all 
maybe I'm just using it in wrong way but I often use it to give me some suggestions for grammar mistakes
No problem 
What uni do you attend to put on my list on which to avoid?
ho chi minh university of science
making a code editor with llm/rag integration seems like a decent swe project tho (is that what it means?)
both, actually
my project needs to include some form of AI in it, but also vibecoding is highly encouraged
the uni im looking at has pushed for ai investment in its teaching methods and although im not entirely sure what it entails im sure not looking forward to using it (and i wont unless i absolutely have to for something and if so i will curse that course)
wait can someone seriously explain what "vibe-coding" is to me?
(I don't program)
I've heard the term around and kinda assumed it was something like coding really quick without worrying much about the details or something? but that just doesn't really make sense
Basically, tell an "AI"/LLM you want a program that does such and such, and what it comes up with is the result, unless you try running it and it does something completely wrong.
lmfao
I think I would try to transfer
To a different college
ā¹ļø
Calc 1 and 2 do be pretty tedious. When I got to analysis I had a lot of fun though š
maybe im bad at calc
Everyone is bad at calc when they first learn itš¤£. It's just so different from everything else up to that point
...i wish i could say it's my first time learning it
Anyone here from ISI(Indian Statistical institute)
starting abstract algebra was a WAY bigger leap than starting calc
in abstract algebra its all abstract
you write proofs, and work with the general case
basically no numbers
no
rosy reappears just to answer no to that 
calc BC covers calc I and calc II
Ik a few ppl from there, why?
ideas for how to make a self study plan based around a textbook? idk how i should go about choosing problems to do for practice (entire textbook problem set or just some of them or from some other resource)
i was also wondering how u guys went about taking textbook notes (if at all). like focus on in depth notes or moreso just notes as a method of slowing my pace while reading. idk if latex page or paper would be better
for calculus
how many problems to do varies on you and and the material, you should focus on doing enough problems to get an understanding of the section and then you can move on if you feel ready
if youre a little above your comfort zone but not completely lost in the sauce and still understanding with some effort thats a pretty good spot to be
self studying comes with a caveat of there being less pressure to actually learn stuff since theres no examinations like in school so its pretty easy to feel like ure up to speed on smth u maybe actually arent but in my experience as long as try to be honest with urself and take ur time when u need to its fine
not sure about written notes but smth i recommend is, whenever relevant, draw and make figures
esp for smth like calc
get comfortable with putting ur thoughts into pictures
my notes consist mostly of drawings and personal comments and thoughts about the material
Random question , if I have a perfect right triangle you know like 3,4,5, will there squares be able to make one?
No visuals most important
Just copying this from another place I had incorrectly inserted this:
I just need advice for studying. I got 95+ every quarter in Algebra 1 last year, along with a 97 on the regents. This year, in Honors Geometry, nothing seems to be clicking with me. I got a horrible grade of 78 last quarter an have a 61 right now, and I just donāt know how to help myself. I have a 9th period Sophomore Tutor I meet with before tests, I do all my homework and extra review she gives us, etc. My teacher is also useless, always making it sound like Iām inconveniencing her when I ask a question. I do, however, need to raise my grade immediately regardless and just donāt know what else to do. Again, I do every packet or extra review she gives. Thanks.
reading mathematicianās delight by sawyer
I like sawyerās book because he says like āletās understand math from the ground upā
I especially like that he describes math with concrete examples before abstract ideas, such as writing straightforward sequences of numbers before introducing functions or derivatives.
I want to get a skill like switching thinking between concrete examples and abstract ideas when I need, when I read and think about math
Real
<@&268886789983436800> spam
Hi guys got a quick question
Which topic should I start when I'm relearning analytic geometry
Straight lines, parabolas I guess(?).
if its hs, khan academy is the way to go
I assume this is also on the hs side, if so khan academy as well
there isnt really a better free resource than that
afaik atleast
watch there be a instutional access highschool algebra springer textbook 
The course is on the 14th do yoj think I could grind out all lessons by then
Alright 2 tho it ain't for hs
I just forgot the topics in the subject
It depends on you tbf, if you retained most if not all, I would say definitely you would be able to and even have some freetime (given you arent working a job), otherwise, having atleast some knowledge might be able to get you close to there
Ofc it depends on your study habits and etc etc
Iām in algebra II and took geometry I think I have some knowledge
I had a reallg bad algebra I teacher
Tjat skipped a lot of units
And I didnāt find out until I already selected to progress
She skipped quadratics
Because it was towards the end and she was overwhelmed because we would barely ger work done because my school has horribke behavioral students
I am lost? I dont think I understand what you mean by analytical geometry then
I transferred out to a technical school
But
So Iāve had to work extra hard in those courses to get Aās and ABās
Oh dang, thats sucky, since you are in school still, it should be fine to finish by the 14th just have to put in some effort along with your current(?) studies
yes
Yes I will
I hope I pass
Because the other option to grhadya without that is really doabale
But Iād love to prove myself wrong
Were talking abt the same topic
iirc quadratics is near the end of alg 1
Yeah she skipped it
She sucked
She got fired
I failed the test and got above the school average
Oh, are you saying that Khan Academy isnt helpful for the subject material then?
Noooo
We've got misunderstanding going on
ššš
Ah gotcha, no worries
Khan academy is so helpful olus the fact that its free
is it better to take notes when self studying on a computer (i.e. typesetting via overleaf) or using a notebook
in terms of i guess content retention
idm speed
im reading ladr but lowkey my notebook is messy and ive realized i fill like 2 of them for a subject
rn what im thinking is to first take notes on paper then transcribe to latex
then for problems ill use paper as scrap and answer on a document online
ig its really slow but i do want my stuff to be digital
You'd have to try out yourself, doing things on a computer typically doesnt work for me
So I handwrite my stuff and transcribe to latex if necessary
alright
i just like that it's neat and easily rereadable
whenever i write notes i never read them cuz theyre messy af
also its easy to verify proofs cuz i can just copy paste a ss
Any advice on this lads?
I don't know if you've been doing this already, but it's time to start systematically self studying from some book or other resource imho.
When I was in 7-8th grade I used to take my marked exams and attempt all of the questions I got wrong until I get 100%. There were also these work books with tons of high quality problems, and I think I did all of them. What I'm trying to say is that you may need to start identifying your mistakes and working on them, or make the effort to find all of the mistakes your making (through self study ofc)
If you don't know what resource to use I recommend the (relatively short) book "precalculus mathematics in a nutshell" by George Simmons; everything is concise and has nice problems to work on
A processual math like that automatically gets better the more problems you do
Find more questions online on things you're struggling with
what is your guys approach to taking notes? its my first time studying proof based math and i feel like i have a hard time writing TOO much

i hear that doing the proofs to the theorems on your own is a good exercise/learning
rather than just copying it
Especially if u are new to a subject, getting used to the recurring themes of definitions, proof strategies, theorems, etc⦠is very important. In regards to theorems, even if u canāt write a proof for them at least try to spend some time thinking on possible proof avenues and doing some scratch work; I think that will pay off in the long run and help develop some intuition
Also this probably goes without saying but try to do as many exercises as you can stomach

i feel like
even atm i couldnt do the simplest of analysis proofs w/o it taking hours and hours
i try to do a mix of the things you have said. but i also find if i do it too much, i just get stuck on a subject and never moving on
Thatās a fair point; u need to work your way up slowly
Just like any developing skill really
The more u get used to it the more u will be able to handle
Plus there is definitely a level where the marginal benefit of effort is not worth the added burnout
Also if u literally just started them u have to copy a bit just so u can understand the proof techniques

ive seen proofs before in diff subjects
admittedly, i doubt i would have been able to come up with them w/o having seen it before. i havent seen analysis proofs before at all
i think i have to be patient and remind myself how long it takes to learn smth from scratch
do you think it would be worth it to go through one of those introductory proof books? my peers give them a bad wrap and say i should just continue with analysis/do analysis problems
I mean it certainly wouldnāt hurt, but I would say u also donāt want to burn urself out on proofs that are uninteresting or too tangential to what ur focused on
Also depending on what intro real analysis text ur using the first couple proofs are meant to ease u in to general proof strategies
i find a lot of books either to be on two ends. too wordy or not wordy enough
Yeah thatās kinda why I personally didnāt spend too much time on an intro proof book
I never really found one that struck a good balance and was almost always too wordy
I just went to lectures and called it good
i have to self study it 
Iām an average Folland enjoyer myself 
Yeah maybe skim a book and do a couple exercises then
doing them on your own is good but time consuming. I think something that helps me is to basically try and write down a sketch of the proof in words after having read it. I find that if I can't give a high level proof overview then I don't really fully understand. Also if there is some non-obvious trick in the proof, I try to note it down and really distill the trick down into a general principle I can use in other situations
I don't ever really copy down proofs word for word tbh I don't think it's super helpful at least to me
Alternatively rather than doing proofs entirely on your own you can kinda do a hybrid with what I said. Read through and write down only the main ideas and key tricks, then later try and prove the results but only with the proof sketch that you wrote down earlier
I've been doing more latex
Paper is probably better for retention but if you do enough problems on paper it's probably fine since for me most of the proper learning comes from problems (or even just recreating proofs of what you've learned on paper)

i will probably go with this approach
as well as doing more problems
I use obsidianās canvas with the community plugin ālatex suiteā to mindmap my notes, itās not something I can do on paper very easily
You can also use the ālatex mathā community plugin to use sympy on latex expressions
Like hotkeys that algebraically simplify latex expressions / highlighted parts of latex
Latex suite is a bunch of macros, and itās pretty easy to add your own
i generally do not write notes unless im trying to solve something
uh, so I may fail a course this sem
but it's a very high level course, so how likely is this to affect grad applications
I can get is dropped from my transcript
ofcourse I'll try to pass it atleast
what course
A first course in operator theory
oooh
just asking like
when you're reading a textbook, do you typically make notes? if so how
(im specifically referring to math books btw)
I usually take notes from a book when doing extra problems, or sometimes out of curiosity when I want to understand a proof
I sometimes code the problem in python to check my answer. It really helps, and it gives me an extra challenge to make sure I understand the material š
i write things down just so i can have the time and context to internalize them. i also write in details that the authors gloss over.
like heres a recent example: ill write down the proof in red and ill write down details i filled in myself as well as just scratch work and relevant definitions in blue.
I used to, until I realized I'm just writing down the things written in the book 
The book already explains things concisely, so I just started reading the book and doing problems
I already lance lance'd 'em
peak
thanks, @silent tangle
,iamnot studying
Removed the studying! role from you.
Suppose you want to learn real analysis, abstract algebra, or just about anything. Do you just open the textbook read everything then solve the problems? In order? Do you select one chapter? One page, even? When I hear people talking about a specific textbook being better than another, it's as if they've read everything from beginning to end. I ...
If your lecturer is subpar you'd refer to the textbook
I believe in you. DO IT OPEN IT AND GO AT IT. do you have access to chalk and blackbaord? if so HEAVEN!
if you go to uni just go inside a classroom. I often visit my friend's uni and we go inside classrooms that are empty to use the big sliding boards
Nope I find it very hard to read in general, when I open a textbook I like to prove the propositions in the discussion itself (not the exercises) myself. and then move on, like if there isn't a lot of me doing stuff I get very bored. I don't do many exercises unless I feel like I can't do that particular one, then I do that.
I finally got constructing sinusoidal functions (without phase shifts) down!
That took a while to get down.
I'm very close to finishing Algebra 2 now.
that's cool how are you constructing them?
sorry I'm not trying to "quiz" you or put you on the spot I was just curious,
No worries! I can explain the best I can.
So first, you determine if it's sin or cos based on if the midline is at x = 0 or not. If it is, you use sin. If not, you use cos.
Then, you want to see how far up or down the midline is from 0. That's your y, basically (which I will use d for).
Then, you try to determine the amplitude of the equation by seeing how far the maximum or minimum is away from the midline. That would be your a. Sometimes, a is positive or negative depending on if the point they give is below or above the midline (I think).
Finally, you have b. You just multiply the distance (between x values) between the two points by four and solve for 4x = 2pi/b. Usually, that's just multiplying 4x by 1/2pi and then raising it to the -1 power. Eventually, you do enough times to where when you see 12, for example, you know that b = pi/6.
Put it all together and you have asin(bx) + d or acos(bx) + d.
Oh I see you are constructing the asin(bx) + d by getting the constants from the graph. thats fun.
No, this is between two points without the graph.
so you are given for two x1,x2, the values of a(sinbx1) + d and a sin(bx2) + d?
wait I don't get it lol like I understand your process but I don't understand what data you are given
90% of the problems are basically, "A point on the midline is (0,3). The maximum is at (3pi, 4). Make the equation for that."
It doesn't show the graph. You have to construct it without the graph.
Something like this.
Aah I see. cool. I've never heard the word midline being used. but I get it. Nice.
What word is usually used instead?
dang
i was going to reply to someone who helped me decide on resitting cs
and i think they got banned š
since their msgs are gone
I finished school this year but I decided I'm going to resit a level computer science (and potentially further maths) to get better grades

They told me to resit in October and ever since then, I've been thinking about it
i write things down to make sure im following
but not everything
You seem familiar, i have a friend that has the same name as you
Oh it's you
I like how your pfp is literally just i but with extra steps
yeah bru
its the first letter of my name, that's why i kept it
Are you from Italy?
nah bro
yeah the colors do look like it
but it's actually for palestine
i messed up ig
wait you are friends with slender?
I do know him
i see
Will they ban me if I ask doubt related to subjects other than maths?
No, i saw 3 guys post chemistry questions in past 2 days
They didn't get banned
you can do so in the discussion channels, also this one is prob fine to ask for tips on studying specific things that aren't math
derivada you are no more a mod???
damn a lot of things has been when i was busy with exams 
dishonorable discharge of Derivada 
i am a 0580 IGCSE student and I want to give jee mains/advanced exams
what should be the foundation (what topics do I lack)
umm what is pre university
got ut
how to change it
got ut
ty
you don't need to be in university you just need to be interested and do undergraduate math
looking for a math study partner
sigh
I said so since he said he was igcse
yeah IGCSE people's brains will explode if they even see 1st year maths
U doing a degree in math? Iām aiming to do the same or maybe physics. Iām also in IGCSE rn.
-# I'd bet Israel ;D
-# [but it isn't really on-topic, so eh.. i'll dip out]
X.E.
anything they would be interested in im interested in algebra analysis number theory etc...
What level, I might be up for it?
ive done a little bit of each but it's been a minute
Okay. X E.
for number theory elementary
is this set theory lang for include me in the set of elements of study group lol
Maybe. X E.
X E is a not lying thing in bio. X E.
Don't click links. X E.
aight
Well, looks like you clicked a link anyway. X E.
Bruh why are you saying X E after every sentence
Suffice it to say am weird. X E.
I'd bet Earth
X E
Itās like how your grandparents sign their text messages
dear nGroupoid
what do you mean? it's perfectly normal to structure text messages like emails
best, cloud
X Ć A-12
Good to see you around once again
what if I cant type
I would have to write all of that down on a piece of paper and send u a pic right
book of proof for naive set theory
you will use it for intro-level algebra and analysis
Dam
Well let me know if youāre still interested
Sure. X E.
Okay Iāll let you message me when youāre ready then
Ready?
guys if I want specific types of questions how can I make it using some app or ai?
@tropic root
do u really need to make ur own questions?
There is a big chance someone already wrote the questions you are looking for
maybe tell us about the topic and type of questions u need?
these types
it isn't available online it is from a coaching class. the exams are private so there isn't much resources available
Okay, ready. X E.
I structure emails like text messages fr
Email my district manager like "Ay Pablo", his name is not Pablo
Struggling with trignometry in Calculus, how to approach?
I know the formulas but somehow cannot apply them when trying to tackle trigonometric functions
I meant like dm message not over this text channel. Also I just found out Iām going out of town next weekend for a week so we should talk after then.
im lowkey going back to basics to try and understand ill let u know if it helps
mathematicians
questions
about simulators
āFidelityā, ārealismā, and āaccuracyā are concepts used extensively in the simulator related literature. Borgvall [10] (p. 244) defined fidelity as āthe degree of similarity between a simulator and the environment it is designed to simulateā. Owen [11] (p. 9) defined realism as āthe extent to which the simulation or simulator appears, feels and/or behaves the same as the real-life systemā. Finally, accuracy is defined as the degree to which a simulatorās real object representation is precise and is normally associated with an objective measurement [12]; it is about exactness [3].
from those statements ...
i still cant understand the difference between fidelity, realism, accuracy
cant someone help me understand?
please ping
Have you done practice problems with these trig functions
You'll probably have better chances of a useful answer in #modeling than in this generic channel about study methods.
I don't really know the field-specific jargon, but I note that your quote isn't actually saying that any of the cited authors is using both "fidelity" and "realism" with distinct meanings.
The last sentence appears to be saying that while fidelity/realism are more vibe qualities, people tend to use "accuracy" more in situations where the fit of the simulation can be quantified.
any practical suggestions for getting back to studying math after a long time?
Any advice on trigonometry finals?
depends on what topic u want to go back
there are tons of math topics that takes a while to remember (speaking of higher math) 
I am thinking about studying Linear Algebra
maybe a nice youtube playlist with a good presenter can help
I tried reading some notes I downloaded but it seems very opaque to begin with those alone.
I dont have any yt playlist for linear algebra cuz i learned it by reading a book and im still working on proofs in my free time
im reading 2 books iirc and if ur curious about them i can share em
proofs?
proofs I mean learning linear algebra with its proof not just matrices, dets etcā¦
here is an example
Oh you mean like a more involved course rather than the usual computational type courses offered to Engineering and Sciences majors?
ye
the math im doing in engineering is lame and boring so i just study other stuff for fun š
feel free to :) I am browsing through common suggestions in forums like MSE and what have you
and trying to see what I like
common suggestions are Friedberg, Axler, Artin, etc
jim hefferon, richard bronson gabriel b. costa, and steven roman
thanks I will look into it
Finally, this took over an hour to master.
@brittle falcon
Dude I remember taking that like 4-5 years ago omg it brought back so much memories (and frustration)
Iām not even done yet. I still have to do the Mastery challenge on that and then master the phase shift word problems.
At the very least, I will never forget that cos(0) = 1 and sin(0) = 0 ever again.
GUYS anyone who has done IGCSE Maths and AS and A2 levels maths , pls tell me how hard is AS and A2 levels compared to IGCSE
I have gone through skimming contents of like 20 books on linear programming with an online library thing, none are saying how to solve systems of bounded linear feasibility problems with inequalities, what should I do?
I don't need just any linear programming, I need this linear programming. X E.
linear programming=math. X E.
I only did a lil bit of IGCSE and moved to GCSE to complete those but the jump from that to a level is substantial, at first it shouldn't be too hard especially if you make sure you don't forget anything but with all a levels the 2nd year is where the heat is
I'm not too familiar with the IGCSE curriculum but iirc you learn just a little bit of differentiation as the last topic right?
Igcse olevel , is js normal maths and its easy , i recommend edexcel board as its better and calculators are allowed there , but for Cambridge u take 1 paper without calculators , there are total 2 papers , AS is 3 papers pure 1 and 2 and (s1 or m1 ) u will pick , anyways its kinda close to olevel but js deeper , and contains more calculus than olevel , so basically AS is js same as normal igcse js few more stuff , especially pure 1 its simple u js get to know some more stuff, but for pure 2 and (s1 or m1 ) they are but deeper but with normal studying is good , taking with a tutor is highly recommended for AL , A2 arenāt easy , its technically hard , and requires much work and a higher mentality, so basically i recommend if ur taking an AL math , stick to As only unless ur soo good at maths then u can take the A2 too
Well, I did find a book with a possible solution but it is copyrighted and I can't make a derivative work. X E.
The thing to ask no longer exists. X E.
I also searched online, no solver other than sagemath and that monster, no. X E.
Should I just pioneer my own solution or what?
I really should just make a Gaussian elimination thing, then see what is left to do. X E.
Maximum of 6 unknown variables left. X E.
X E.
it reminds me of X Ć A-12 (Elon Musk's son's name
)
X. E. X. E. X. E.
I just figured out a big issue, when i take things seriously, my mind performs worse, but when i dont take things seriously, i dont study enough, is there some sort of way i can study seriously without taking things seriously?
not a little but yash not that much its only many graphs and stuff
much harder than normal a level maths
You are given this formula during your calculus course. No cheat sheets are allowed on any tests. Do you rote memorize the formula or take another approach to remember how to calculate the arc length of a curve?
you just do a lot of problems
arc length is $\int ds$, from pythagorean formula [ ds = \sqrt{dx^2 + dy^2} ]
can factor out $dx$ or $dy$ to get [ ds = \sqrt{1 + \ab(\odv yx)^2}\dd x = \sqrt{1 + \ab(\dv xy)^2}\dd y ]
cloud ā
is it a mistake to rote memorize formulas ?
i find that if you do enough practice problems you will remember the formulas you use a lot in them
okay thank you cloud
and riemann
how many hours of problem solving per day is practical
It also helps to be sure you can reproduce a derivation of the formula instead of just the end result.
Even though at first sight that's more details to remember, the whole package is easier to remember than the result itself by rote, because the need for the details to fit together works as a guard against misremembering.
For this purpose, the derivation doesn't need to be a fully rigorous one -- handwaving is fine as long as the handwaving makes it make intuitive sense that the result is what it is.
thanks
is the art of problem solving series the current best way to gain a strong math foundation
man
sometimes i feel like im study in the wrong track
i might need sum advice on how to self study correctly
im feelin my method is pretty time-consumin and not effective
the art of problem is good for content outside of pre-university
it's not the most efficient way
what's your method?
like ima just learn concept passively and do work
wdym by that?
for example im learnin about Bezout theorem, ill just take a quick look at its basic concept and go straight to do work
skipped the basic concept could say
work as in doing the exercises? i think it's not a bad idea to, for example, read the statement of a theorem (in an introductory course) and try to think about the proof yourself using only the concepts that you have learned previously, but it is indeed more time consuming and might require some new techniques you're not familiar with yet
hm yea could say that
sometimes when doin exercises or just "work"(because shorten :p). I got to situlation when i dont know what to do although i know what to do in general
soo
lets say what should i do
to get better
look at the hints
All of my skills are at proficient or higher! Now I'll have to master the remaining skills, which is super hard, but I know I will be able to do it eventually.
tfw 99
i sorta skipped precalc after doing this
i didnt think it was that necessary
although i did the entire trig course too, and maybe a bit of the rational function one, i cant remember. was sorta impatient to get to calc, and i didnt suffer from it
When I was in school, my school did Algebra 2 -> Trigonometry -> Calculus, so I don't even know what Precalculus is exactly outside of Calculus prep.
its sorta weird
a lot of it is not even necessary for calc
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/precalculus
composite functions yes, trig i did the whole trig course, complex numbers no (although maybe useful to learn), rational functions isnt exactly necessary but it might be worth learning to have a look at limiting behaviours and graphing, conic sections isnt needed at all, neither is vectors/matrices (can learn when doing linear algebra), prob/combi also not needed but you might want to learn it anyway, its sorta useful to know if you ever do competition stuff and i just think its interesting and easy enough to do
series you mightve done already, its pretty simple stuff, you see infinite series in calc 2 so maybe do it, but the same stuff is probably covered briefly there
lims and continuity are imo just calc topics, they should be in the calc 1 course
ofc if youre interested in the not necessary things its fine to do
i did some conic section but i got bored
so i think i never did hyperbola
Good job bro!
I did something really similar to this, youāve taken it to the next level (I skipped to calc straight away and didnāt focus on mastery, I think what your doing is rly cool)
What are you planning on studying later
never did the best conic section
the humble circle
After the Khan Academy stuff (which will take a couple years, at least for the math section), I'm thinking about doing Math Academy to learn some undergraduate math (like Linear Algebra) before focusing on either number theory or topology.
Are you in uni or
I graduated without a math major (Game Design).
Game Design does have some math in it, but it's mostly stuff like Boolean Algebra and some mandatory general ed classes.
I started this journey while I was in college, but I kept on doing it even after I graduated.
I'm much more of a writer than a programmer/mathematician.
Nice to see the progress bro
Thank you!
I think khan is a great way to do introductory level courses I. Mathematics
Then you can go to like mit OCW and read textbooks + do exercise problems
true ass bio
Hardy moment
In this encoder truth table
In the first row
Does the outputs 111 affects ?
I mean even if Enabled inputs = 1 (Active low)
It gives the outputs 111 (000 in active low) which it may represented to decimal 0 (for example)
i never understood encoders 
Anyone know how to do Fourier Motzkin elimination or better for 6 variables?
For me in math , the art of consision is good
Solving problems with most consise writing saves time
you can do If very well trained 1000 tasks in 2 hours .
make an equilibre of the variety of problems and repitions of tasks
I donāt see why youād ever want to do 1000 tasks in 2 hours (for the type of task where that aim is reasonable)
me I did maybe 300 tasks in 1 hour
It was about the derivative course when I was in high school .
But I gived very consise answers like as I was
Only with myself It's only me who can understand my answers
So the conditions of validity of my answers were not standard .
I donāt personally see the value in that (in the sense that like, youāre probably comfortable with the process within 100 tasks, let alone 300), but if you wanna
Yes but
it's in orienting the creativity into the goal of concision
In commuticating you're answers in own self
standards of the answers were not like in the exam or to someone else
So economic efforts align with own abilities
Make us able to do a big quantity and variety of tasks with
less time .
In constructing problems and making selections
and repiting only the most important problems .
What's you're own method in studying the prooves ?
I just found out Fourier Motzkin elimination is on GitHub, awesome. X E.
@rotund jolt How do you try to learn from khan academy?
I watch like the video
And take notes
Okay, and do you understand the video or think you do?
I understand
And then where do you mess up?
When it's something i don't know...
I mean a abstract thing
Relate to it
Like problem
When doing the questions on that website, if you mess up enough times it gives you supplmental material to learn foundations. Have you tried that?
Nop
So are you just getting it wrong and then immediately stopping?
never give up
Nop
I never give up in my life but still bad fr

thinking about suicide at this point
After 2 wrong attempts, it generally tells you how to do the question and if you continue to make mistakes in the same lesson then it gives you a quick runthrough of a foundation you may be missing
I don't use the website
I watch like videos on youtube
Of khan
I see, i would strongly suggest using the website
Is It free?
Yep!
What are you're math difficulties ?
I will see it
Yep
What is the thing that you wanted to know ?
So , the prerequise is to know what is a function and what is a variable .
Yep
A variable in math is an indeterminated number witch belong to a set of values , It's a space reserved to complet it with a number
we name it with a letter like x ,y ,z..
x belong to the set of real numbers
indeterminated it , it means that it's not precise on one value but it's for you to give it a value .
x,y,z,t,a,b,c,d..
All letters , In fact the name of it
is not important .
Yep
you can name it : sebastient belong ]-infinity,+infinity[
and sebastien= 5 or sebatient = 9999 or sebatien =3..
what ever number it's a space reserved to
full it with you're number .
Sebastien is a name u mean like x and y and ...?
ok
It's like an empty cup witch didnt have water
and you can full it with some values depending on what is permitted .
We are coming to that :So like x+1 = 2 it's like [give something here ]+1=2
Ok
so as x belong to R , the only value permetted here is 1
were changing quantities in a domain
ok
Then you need to know what's a function
because a sequence is a function
A function is like a machine
A function is like a machine that:
takes a number as input
applies a precise rule
gives one single number as output
We often name this machine with a letter, for example f
ok
It has two hands set of numbers in one hand and set of numbers in the other hand
ok
and connections beetween the first set to the other
By giving each number of the first group to the function
it applies it's machine it gives an output into the second group
ok
like f: ]-infini;+infinity[ to ]-infini,+infini[, x to f(x)=2x


