#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 172 of 1
usually you just give an hour talk and then you get some questions and that's about it
in my case it was just like 20 minutes of questions and I passed
Now, Idk why it is called defence. It's not like they are trying to break you down
Or do they
yeah it's confusing
you defend

they might give you a harder time and interrogate you if it's not clear you understand math 
is the talk any different from giving a seminar?
Welpppppp
it's pretty much the same yeah
oh then I would love that
Anyway I've never tried defend
I gave a practice talk to my advisor which was WAY TOO TECHNICAL and assumed everyone read the thesis in detail
how do you usually succeed with your own thesis defend
and he was like bro just do a normal talk
bro cooked
my thesis was also like ~300 pages
Wtf
how long did it took you to prepare it?
so yeah nobody ready it
I know 300 pages is normal but
that's the sad part
is this the 1+1 proof?
1 day to prepare the slides for practice talk and 1 day to prepare the updated slides
no like the thesis..
oh uhhh
It is collection of what you achieved, right
Like there are going to be a few papers worth of materials
I think the last year or so has been the main serious writing endeavor
a lot of the time was just learning what the hell was going on with Langlands
obviously the writing goes much faster when you know what is going on
Wow, that sounds it would have been hard time even for you
I worked on this project for about 5 years
a lot of those years were learning and failed attempts at resolving this conjecture
i dont understand the topic lol my highest level is radical equations for now..
really only fell into place in the last year or so
But you had a main focus right
Note to myself again to never do langlands
yes
ok cool
how did you got into math @vivid halo ?
Even mighty nG took 5 years 
Langlands is gonna be extremely difficult to get into if you don't already have a lot of the relevant background going in
I mean I had a main conjecture I was interested in but had to learn a lot of stuff before I could make a serious go at it
From the talks we had I can pretty much tell you are very much shimura variety pilled
(Also not many people do Langlands anyway)
It's generally considered something of a death trap
do langlands occur in physics?
I started out mainly in computer science and realized that most of my projects were math oriented
Langlands-adjacent might be easier, though you should know what stuff you're pulling from and what background you need
yes
ohh
hmm
I feel like most of my big projects are math related 
perhaps do you have an interest soon enough with quantum computing?
So if you're a second year grad student and don't know what cohomology is and you're considering doing endoscopy... maybe reconsider
How did you manage to transition?
idk I just started doing math
Wow
In American undergrad you aren't committed to a major right away
the Spring semester of my first year in college was borked because of family emergency which forced me to have to retake differential equations
why is that)
?
So you can just switch from taking CS classes to taking math classes
Don't you learn cohomology in first year at least
And declare math major
and the professor was nice enough to give me an automatic A for the retake if I did independent math stuff
(Apparently homology is "easy" as well)
so I studied differential geometry that semester
Usually, I'm just saying that if it were the case that someone at first was doing financial math and wanted to switch to number theory that late in the game, don't do endoscopy
ohh
that was the main semester where I really seriously got into math
Ah, true
isn't like endoscopy in medicine?
I wish "applied category theory" was common
yes but it's also a term in Langlands
Then maybe I could have done that
endoscopy is not that bad
you guys do endoscopy?
endoscopy is one of the main (unfortunately named) ideas in Langlands
ohh damn..
there is a somewhat rececnt proposal called "Beyond Endoscopy" that Langlands himself proposed as a potential strategy for resolving some of the main conjectures
everyone that has worked on Beyond Endoscopy has either got a fields medal or quit math forever
Just checked, hell is stable conjugacy
yes endoscopy is about stable conjugacy
just elts in G(F) conjugate over \bar{F}
"Stable"
Yes 
calling it stable is such a move
I bet stable is like normal
I'm sure someone from this server soon enough will solve a million dollar equation
True but in context, if you were doing financial math until first year of grad school and now you're going to NT for the first time, you don't want to deal with Langlands program at all
The main point is that the usual Arthur trace formula behaves well under conjugacy but not under stable conjugacy
"Oh this seems better behaved, do we name it stable or normal"
On the spectral side this means that multiplicities behave funny
You can stabilize the trace formula to fix this
How do you stabilize a formula?
you find a way to turn an invariant distribution TF into a stably invariant distribution STF
you want the distributions to be invaiant under stable conjugacy instead of just conjugacy
what this typically amounts to is like
you start with the distribution of the invariant trace formula TF^G for a reductive group G
after stabilization you get some sum of stable distributions STF^G+(correction terms)
where the correction terms are stable distributions STF^H for so called endoscopic groups H of G
Ah wait, so this is back to stable conjugacy
yeah exactly you're trying to put together these correction terms so that things behave nicely under stable conjugacy
I literally just got my math PhD
I am doing CS
that was like 8+ years ago
nG is already done lol
nG?
nGroupoid
white background user spotted
ahh bright
dark theme sucks
I'm sure most cs majors likes dark
i guess when you open your laptop in your lecture hall everyone gets flashbang
lol
Meanwhile I just go with Default theme
my default pdf viewers are light mode and if anything it just bothers me more to have some windows dark and some windows light
dark mode is fine if everything else is dark
but mixing both just looks awful
almost everything is light mode for me, except like discord
cause I just keep everything on default
yeah I just can't deal with that
when you try to use dark mode on kindle and the equations turn into white boxes
yea because when someone ambushed you, you'll be prepared since you can still see the background
light mode when everything is dark feels like someone is gonna ambush you soon..
hold on let me get a picture
yea try doing it
I hate this already
looks shitty
I mainly keep everything on light mode because when I do want darkmode I use the darkroom mode
Do you use discord on computer?
which turns white with black text to black with RED text
but if you have something in dark mode then the darkroom mode flashbangs you
almost always yes
I do with that discord had better mobile versus PC settings
I would not object to having it be light mode on PC and dark mode on mobile
@vivid halo in the process of getting phd did you got hair loss?
but it kinda doesn't let you do that
imagine the stress
only a little bit recently but probably becuase I've been abusing amphetamines and nicotine
but not that badly
even me is getting lots of hair lol..
not balding like some of my friends
wtd
wtf
so it's true
you get saitama process
the friends I am referring to are not in math btw
what’s true
the most balded friends I know are in CS and finance
bald process
well luckily by the time they’re bald hopefully they’ll be able to retire
so far it's okay since my hair used to be WAY TOO THICK before and now it's just normal thick
why is this phrased like you just discovered balding
and maybe the hair loss is more noticeable since I grew my hair out so every lost hair looks way bigger
Nicotine 
nah even me is really curious how do they get shiny
yeah nicotine is not great 
nicotine is great especially at lower doses
man i can get amphetamines legally
at higher doses it start to suck
but i am too lazy to make an appt because add
you know what is great though? meth

just inhale gym salts instead
you get pumped
eat 8 scoops of pre workout
anyone that is taking the main ADHD meds (adderall, dexedrine, vyvanse) is basically just taking meth
it's not actually that different

Ehhh
my uncle take ocd medicines
doesn't have effects at all
at higher doses there are some notable differences
it's just fucking drugs
at lower doses it's really hard to tell the difference
if i have mental health issues i think I'll stick with just advice from therapy not taking any drugs at all
that's stupid advice
you're mentally ill so you should just raw dog life without meds
yea my unc just kept punching walls here
damn I wanna learn more dynamic programming
I just realized my uni doesn't have a deep course dedicated to it
self study time
i still need to learn the actual math behind it
learning how to code is fun for me until i realized i need math
do code without the math : bad
do code with math : paradise
I mean, you know python right
yeah
Ah wait
that's what I mostly use for math
Dynamic programming, not dynamically typed
lmao
Algorithm courses should talk about dynamic programming imo
Any which glosses over it is just bad
They do but as you know me
I don't trust my courses
🗿
They just scratch the surface
Last semester I had lin alg cuz it was mandatory for my degree
I was studying probabilistic number theory and sieves the whole semester

Cracked
tho I almost got recieved a critical hit with stats
I was taking stats with lin alg
oh and calc 2 as well
usually cs majors just take 2 at a time but I literally just took 5 math courses in one shot
I kinda regret it now tbh
they were fun to attend and skip as well
But you knew most of them, no?
Ahhh
Now that is an issue
im gonna convince my AG prof to open a class for AT
Just create your own web services during the time!
absta did you know there’s an iterative form of dynamic programming
where you can stop as early as desired
Oh
Never thought about that, but reasonable that it exists
yeah
dynamic programming is also very related to reinforcement learning
except in reinforcement learning nobody knows wtf “optimal” means because it’s too difficult so they just use other random methods or something
idk
i spent about 2 days reading about it and forgot everything
Sometimes yhere is no options
just use greedy u will def get the answer
the guy who was following the path all along: "why did I end up in gulag wtf"
well i use dijkstra for everything
I tried randomizing prime numbers in a binary tree then ran the greedy algo. Each time the tree changes then I graphed the results to see some probabilistic results
use dijkstra when you have negative numbers so true
i have vague memories of this going badly
real
I don't quite remember the extended version
I forgor the name
whatever I just call it extended dijkstra's algorithm
Floyd-Warshall?
And I am reading for the first time
Do you guys help with math?
Yes but only to those who can state the Pythagoras theorem
something something squares
ok?
It's true
Does anyone play rocket league

wait, you play that game as well?
Is there a knot theory section in this server?
which channel should i use for operator algebras?
thanks.
hello
Pls review help-10
I need iurgent help
Mathematics is universal language and my favourite letter of this language is inverted A
i personally don't like when people say math is a language, it feels reductive... math has a language, but the language isn't everything
mathematics is a cultural phenomenon 
i dont either, but im a pure math boi rather than applied, physicists and the like are more likely to think of it as "language"
It's the only language where people know their limits
Universal quantifier?
I really like that symbol aswell
Ok, is your favorite capital greek glyph $\Xi$, $\Phi$, or $\Psi$? These are the only reasonable answers
terdragontra
(ok im lying to be provocative)
This looks very complicated
psi looks coolest
ah, yes, poseidon's answer
lol
the evolved form
oh, that didnt make the image appear, indirect image posting is restricted too it seems
i just meant that character specifically, its like a doubled psi
yeah
anyone have sad/melancholic music reccs for me
its night and i want to sit on the balcony and stare
thx
Listening to sad music while doing geometry questions is a different kind of fun altogether
are you listening to sad music or doing geometry
Don’t know if it’s the vibe you’re looking for but Malibu 1992 by COIN is my favorite
I think $\Omega \Lambda \Psi \Theta \Gamma$ tend to be pretty cool
Mero
doing geometry by itself makes me sad
That's why you get the feel of sad music with it
liana flores's new album Flower of the Soul! My favorite track is Nightvisions, then Orange Coloured Days, and Crystalline
i found her from her song "rises the moon", which touched me very deeply during a very dark time
is there such thing as sad jazz
spiegel im spiegel
purcells when i am laid in earth if youre feeling dramatic
i thought this was a joke
i read the start as "purecels when i am laid in earth"
😭 lmao
mojave 3 'excuses for travellers' has quite a nostalgic vibe
maybe nick drake pink moon
someone already sent it
i think malibu 92 was the best vibes match of all the songs i listened to so far
i also listened to one liana flore song
oh lol, it is a v good album so would def rec to listen at some point
also pretty short, like 30 mins
its an album?
album and song
ooh yeah im just listening now
good vibe
mazzy star fade into you, not the same vibe though
i love that song so much
discovered it during a binge of Gilmore girls
yeah its so good
real hard hitter though
i think the album overall is p. good acc but that song def stands out
rly got to listen to more of their stuff
Different vibe from Malibu 1992 but I also like The Subway Song
GUYS HOW DO U STUDY FOR GEOMETRY 2nd SEMESTER 1st summative assessment
I only remember what I did to STUDY FOR GEOMETRY 2nd SEMESTER 2nd summative assessment
You posted this already in discussion, do not spam. Also this isn't the same at each school, we have no idea what your summative assessments look like
Because the Bot is always right
I think if it is closed there is still chance to open it
But if you missed that chance then yes imo
i cant
someone else asked more questions in it
and now im unable to msg in it
Sorry to interrupt you, can I ask a question about logic and mathematics?
João and Ana are counting the houses in a circular square, counting clockwise and considering that the fifth house counted by João is Pedro's twelfth and João's thirtieth house will be Pedro's fifth, how many houses does the square have?
Why are you suggesting someone use an occupied help channel?
it was not occupied at the time
@light horizon since you were curious about my question
ok. my current cgpa on a 10.0 scale is 6.6 (2nd sem student in a NIT) if i make it back to an 8 by sem4, what are my chances of getting in to say, UC berkeley as a transfer student? i believe a 8 cgpa would be a 3.2 on the 4.0 scale. my co-curriculars arent interesting(i hear it matters a lot for american unis) i won 5 sport medals, 4 quiz+spell bee competitions at my school level, so nothing great. my jee percentile in math in 99.3 (meaning i scored better in math than 99.3% of other students). what advice would you give me to do a succesful transfer? i code a bit in my free time, and am going to get more involved in math, debating clubs at my college. anything else i should do?
my gpa was actually 8.16 in sem1 but due to some problems it dorpped by a lot
sorry for pinging, ignore if youre not interested
my choice of major is math/phy
my 10th grade was 93.5, and 12th was 85
How much financial aid do you need
the problem is many of these metrics are based off different standards/scales from what american unis use so it's hard to gauge the competitiveness of your application, the other thing is that i'm sure international acceptance rates are already low and transfer rates are probably lower
Intl transfer rates to cal are probably almost 0
And their gpa isnt great
uc berekely has high transfer acceptance rates, but 0 aid for internaionl students
if you use reddit, i'm pretty sure there's a subreddit called r/chanceme
ivys have low rates, but good aid
alright
i will look into it
What is intl transfer?
Well high transfer rates from California community colleges
Chance me is stupid
i read that 90% of transfers are from community colleges
oh i didn't know, haven't personally used it
Maybe a little more
it has nothing to do with your ambition or intelligence or capabilities or anything else, it's just really hard to get in with such low international acceptance rates
That gpa is hurting you
oh and one more question if you dont mind
And without it your chances are just bad a priori
when they ask to submit gpa, will i have to submit at time of application of at time when my year gets over?
or*
Submit the grades that have been finalized
I would rather consider fresh entry exam than transfer
Hello
i finished first year already
There isn’t one
year 2 begins in a month
Huh?
Wdym, they don't accept international students at all?
caltech is also going to be hard right? i hear they have their own transfer entry exams. if i ace those, would i have a chance?
Caltech is basically not happening if we’re being realistic
ok
You can apply
any college you think i have a chance tho?
Because chances are nonzero
i mean a good chance
Consider applying to a range
You’ve only mentioned prestigious unis
Consider less selective ones
There is a uni in Montana, right?
Several
yeah coz no point spending too much money studying abroad, and maybe studying an year extra only to go to a college that isn't "worth it"
Why do you mention Montana specifically
the infamous montanese views, clearly
Low population (and view, yeah)
Montana is also the only state to have banned TikTok too 
Funniest shit ever
I'm an Indian too
IISER
ah nice
Not the best one for math
Lmao we all know Kolkata is trash
which one are you in
Tvm
malayali aano?
Endara myre
yeah
i mean i am from blr
So why do you want to transfer in the first place?
but studing in kozhikode
Aah toda toda hinthi aata
i like phy/math + dont like my course
Ignore my remarks
i speak urdu at home
Too bad, deal with it (sadly)
Damn
yeah cant help ig, i even gave advaned this year but failed
🗣️🔥
youre a 2nd year?
oh
What's ur course?
dropping out? or continuing?
I'm continuing
I haven't even started my major year technically
lucky you bro studying science
Because failing health
a beautiful mind?
Uhh
the movie
Not so romantic of a representation
do you think nptel courses help
i took like 6 for the coming sem
5 in math, 1 in physics
سلام موسی
you didnt reply:(
um
nuclear and particle physics
introduction to group theory
number theory
combinatorics
algebra-i
linear algebra
??
no, the courses are in the coming sem
i havent paid the fees for the exam yet
i just want a way to escape engg and get into math/phy
thought this could help in getting to ucb/ivy league but just got reality check lol
Hmm
Well
I'm assuming you're in a BTech course?
The only option is to focus on your degree atm
yeah, mechanical engineering bascially
And go for an MSc later on
From an IISER/IISc/TIFR/CMI/ISI whichever is spplicable
research in bad and dead in india tho, isnt it? lot of unfair practices ive heard
Bhai
It's an MSc
A master's course is nowhere near actual research stuff
It's just 2 years
Guys What are you talking about?
سلام
how to become a math dude
okay
خورزمی
Do more math
oh and dude
as a year 3 student
are you able to solve putnam questions?
my degree is a waste isnt it
I've lost my flair for olympiad math or anything close to that
if i go for a msc
since i spent months studying stuff i didnt need to like management and engineering graphics
i mean my btech degree
Firstly, transfers have high academic requirements
my btech degree would be a waste
Not really
You have the chance to complete your master's without having to do another bachelor's
Isn't that an advantage already?
bro
He didn't study algebra enough 😔 🙏
are people in your class actually passionate about their major?
Some
mine arent
And by some, i mean 5-6 out of 20
i hate siting in my class
Then stand?
still hate it
6 nptel courses is a recipe for disaster
why tho
idk man i will conquer math or math will conquer me
Not wise
cant let engg get to me before either do
Take it slow
I suggest you take linear algebra and the group theory course for noe
Algebra 1 is technically a graduate course
when i was 15 i thought i would win the putnam prize. now i now i shall not live to be in an algebra course
which is?
algebra is a graduate course?
bro uta
Yeah
howd you know who the prof was
wait, really?
Which prof?
garge
Algebra 1 is a misnomer
isn't it part of the standard UG math curriculum worldwide?
is this commutative algebra or smth 
Yeah, but it's on the level of dummy and foote
or alg geo?
Nope, it's groups rings and modules
But the course doesn't go into much detail explaining stuff like they'd usually in a ug offering
Very normal in my uni
but D&F is used in many UG algebra courses, is it not? 
oh yeah I tried that course
Is it?
ah, is algebra not a standard UG course there?
I thought so
No
It's usually Herstein or Gallian or Pinter for ug texts
Yea
that seems stupid
i am impressed how you knew who the nt professor was
I used neither 
yes, but you are better
Holy
wdym
I'm pretty sure the grad algebra courses here are meant for students who don't already have a strong background coming in from UG though 
oh whoops
I misspoke
you'll have to forgive me lol
for some reason I thought I had written "Grillet" instead of "Gallian"
We have 3 grad courses for algebra
3am brain kicking in hard 
- Group
- Ring
- Field and modules
No
Grad or?
yes
Not so much tbh
The majority of courses are dedicated to computer science brainrot
And a bit of model theory
icic
well more like math designed for cs
oof
80% of it is just linear algebra

perhaps LA at the level of Roman then?
maybe idrk
I see phd students do what they want tho
That's because they come here specifically for that one particular prof
Because they share interests in the same field
interesting
But they still have to get through a bit of brainrot yeah
I heard once that one prof failed one of his students just because he got 89% in his analysis course instead of 90%
tbf, I think most students go through stuff they already know very well at least one point in their academic lives
So he went away with a masters instead of a phd

w h a t
that's brutal
if a square is a2 and b square is b2 then where does the extra 2ab in a+b whole sqaure come from?
I feel like there is a toxic culture around analysis here for some reason. They called me genius for doing a presentation on something related and the whole time I was wondering "wtf?"
bro
$(a+b)^2 = (a+b)(a+b)$
Closer
what do you mean by toxic culture?
i am a second year engineering student
the prime of minister of endia asked thaat question
i thought it was funny
idk it's kinda like how most students don't like English in HS
oh I see
😳
And they would avoid it like the plague
uta also said he doesn't like analysis
I think analysis is respectable, even if I'm not the biggest fan of it
why
I think that people who intentionally avoid one part of math like the plague are missing out on a broader picture, so to speak
why do you need to know? 
not at the moment, sorry
Tbh they don't really care much. They just want the phd and get stuff done
it's not hard to find out where I am though
what kind of phd students are there just to get the degree and leave?
isn't that against the purpose of doing a phd
You don't need a PhD to do a job
I would expect them to at least have an eye for research though

or at least care a bit
wait until u hear the story of the guy who bribed his prof to get his phd done
the rep theory prof is wild ngl
oh, more stories? 
goodness
do I even want to hear more about your uni horror stories
real
Which is why I'm straying away from academia and instead go the independent research path instead. I don't really care whether I discover something interesting or whether someone else discovers the same thing I'm interested it, I would still consider it a big achievement for me
وعليكم السلام
that’s totally fair.
I wish you the best of luck with that route 
it’s a tough road to walk as well, but I have faith in you
I need to sleep 
Same
كندا
🇨🇦
Idk getting forced at gunpoint
Neither
I thought you eat whatever you want on these days lol
Do you guys have like a tradition to eat these stuff
lmfao
my text rushing in to the right at high speed the moment arabic comes up
i do not understand it myself
i am not a burger
i also do not speak only englush
damn we are the same person
i can not send images here fuck,.,.,.
not started yet
going to a certain place in a month tho
yeah
yeah
fellow sufferer
cse
that i'd like not to say
i have

don't beat yourself up over allat stuff..... most people don't even recognise the men in my pfp...... life is sad
theres like a morbillion people who give the exam you're still in a very high percentile among them
just call me bro i'm fine with it
yes
im crying
i was talking to a ghost apparently
you still are
true
i can talk to ghosts
I do like harmonic analysis
Which is not even all of fourier analysis
And since i plan on doing stuff in quantum information, it makes sense for me to study fun anal too
I don't like real and complex for some reason
Which explains why I've been procrastinating completing the latter half of complex, i need that to study algebraic curves after all
all analysis is real analysis
It's real and it's spectacular
Ok discussion1 seem to be talking about food so ill repeat here.
Would you argue that 0.8^infinity is equal to 0?
Yes for the interval ]- 1,1[ that is true
Yes definitely
I see no way to define it where that fails
I can't get used to that notation.
I mean, it is open
It's french notation
yeah. the point is when I see that and I be like, what the hell is this sorcery everytimes
and then. Ah, it is open
Yeah some notation/terms vary greatly between nations
sorry to interrupt, but what resources do you people recommend for free, projective and injective modules and exact sequences? preferably with lots of examples
Real.
geometry?
I mean, it intertwine with different fields
Depends what exactly you mean by "0.8^infinity", but in the context of limit arithmetic (where I'd most expect to see an expression like that) 0 is going to be the value.
measure theory has something to do with it, complex has something to do with it, stochastic calculus has something to do with it, and so on
why does math feel to wear me down
like i love learning it, but doing questions just starts killing me (true for all subjects tbh)
Because our brain don't like to think a lot like watching movies or playing games seems interesting to us but when it comes to thinking our brain naturally doesn't like except few people
Problem solving is active process and takes lots of thinking
i dont believe that to be the case
i in general self-learn math so learning actually requires a LOT MORE thinking than application
in fact solving questions feels boring and wasting time to me (although that isnt the case because that is the only way i can get proficient at any topic)
maybe you have got only boring questions ?
i learn math by first finding a random thing, checking out it's applications and stuff, and deriving the thing myself (sometimes even end up in a topic loop due to this but that is still funner than doing questions)
idk most people in my vicinity do them without getting bored
can you give an example of a topic youve learned recently / currently learning ?
i dont really remember tbh, i never complete a topic in one go...
i'm sorry, but i disagree completely, you need to solve questions to really learn math, just "knowing" is not enough. i know because i've went through this, if that's what you're referring to
you cant think of any math thing you learned recently ??
are you really just bored or you can't solve stuff?
ah thats a good point, are you solving the problems but are bored or are you bored because you get stuck ?
pretty sure solving just makes u proficient not really helps me in learning anything tbh
i keep gaining knowledge about stuff but like formally i never complete most of the topics i learn
nah im relatively good at solving questions
well, if we're talking about stuff like pre-college algebra maybe, but stuff you'd see on a math degree absolutely needs to be solved
then probably youve doing too easy/rote/uninteresting problems
how to get harder ones?
ok if you cant say ANYTHING youve learned, can you at least say what level it is youre working at?
depends on what youre doing, thats why i was asking
i cant specify that as well, sometimes i just dig deep into grade 10 stuff, other times im trying to learn like bachelors in math stuff
i really dont follow any disciplined or formal routine while learning so even the questions i do vary A LOT in terms of difficulty
surely you can say one thing, im not asking for like 'pre-calc' or 'analysis' or anything
can be as small as 'quadratic formula' or 'matrices' or 'formal definition of a limit' or anything
sometimes ill be doing my own textbook, sometimes doing imo questions
let's go with quadratic ig (thats what they're teaching at school although i did school level 4yrs back)
well thats not a good example then, im after something new-ish to you
i havent really learnt anything recently coz of school load and my burnout
surely something more recently than 4 years ago though
is 1.5 good?
sure
high school calc then ig
i tried doing uni calc but i was too lazy to learn matrices and then i got bombarded with hw and exams
ok given everything youve said, i feel like putnam qs might be a good fit for yyou
they tend to be more problem solving oriented rather than rote application of a specific piece of maths - so you can draw inspiration from all over the place
also they can cover vastly different topics, again suiting your liking to jump about
and obv putnam has some notoriety for being hard, i promise a lot of the qs arent actually that bad and im sure you could do some
you mind sharing some sources?
so id say just go have a look at some papers, see if any questions interest you https://kskedlaya.org/putnam-archive/
Putnam Archive
tnx
the questions get harder the higher the number
so A1 and B1 are the easiest and A6 and B6 are hardest
what is the syllabus of putnam
its an undergraduate competition, so anything you might find in ug
but a lot of it can be solved without any of that
oh
just problem solving
btw im not really that aware of what comes in ug so...
i wouldnt worry about it
oh
if you look at a question and think its interesting, give it a go
sure but like it feels really bad that once i finally am not able to do a question, i check it's solution and find i couldnt do it bcs i didnt know this specific topic
i dont think thatll be as common of an issue as you think
some putnam is tricky and some of them are just you seeing what they hide
math problem is not about solving the problem but solving it in an elegant way
can I do this easier
ah yes this is what i seek in questions
putnam is something along that line... for some questions
id say like half of putnam qs you can do without explicit undergrad knowledge
because you might see the straight way to solve it. but that might be too much or too hard
like i havent even completed grade 10 formally so yeah
id say youre good to go
theyve very much more 'problem solving' style qs rather than question on a specific undergrad topic
damn
nice
ill give it a shot and let u know
(although id still prefer knowing the syllabus but bcs u have so much faith in me...)
math syllabus in college is wild because you can learn anything... if that college has something to offer. But I think you can look for test outline or blueprint online
honestly speaking there are better things you can do in ug than putnam
most people don't "prepare" for putnam in the undergrad years
either they perform well because they were already IMO medalist from high school
or they just pick another path like research
so doing imo will make me automatically good at putnam?
no
Putnam has more advanced material such as calculus
also depends on what you mean by 'good', cause the median score is around 3 points out of 120 in Putnam
no like in terms of math skill
IMO can be good preparation for Putnam
if that's what you're asking
well
so hypothetically if im good at imo, and learn the syllabus of putnam and become as proficient as i am at other topics on those as well then what would be the case?
you cannot just 'learn the syllabus', or at least this is not a trivial thing to just do - you can do an undergraduate in maths though
and yes being good at imo will mean that you have strong problem solving skills which will carry over well to any maths
"hypothetical" 🤡
i dont really know what you are asking
basically what you have said is 'if i have very strong soft mathematical skills (i.e. problem solving) and a good background in theory what i can do' well anything that you could do after getting an undergraduate degree
so how would i perform in putnam?
likely well
only one way to find out, by practicing papers
but i dont understand the utility in this line of questioning ??
exactly you seem a bit confused as to what you are asking
wha
why are you asking 'if i was good at imo and knew a lot of math how would i do on the putnam'
yeah like why are you seeking validation from us, cause it sounds that way to me
okok
Calm down people just take a deep breath and hold for 10 mins
I've been holding onto my cat for ten minutes now. What now?
how did u reply that in 2mins after the msg...
I gave wrong instruction due to bad English should have said hold it for 10 min
Time travel
maybe they just hold it 8 minutes before reply

what the actual fuck?
i thought it was something like 1 in 500
cause we got a middle schooler with albinism
~1k people in our school, wolfram says that's 4.9%
its statistically significant 
what is significant?
chance of having someone with albinism at school
(if i hadn't looked at the data beforehand and actually made a hypothesis about the rate of albinism at my school)
(but also this is like one individual im guessing there's more to it?)
- -a + b + c + d
or - a - b - c - d
im guessing its related to this?
what does it even mean
explain like i just finished high school
Haha
One days you take Ls one days u take Ws, but at the end of the day you still need to solve math exercises
I mean, statistical significance requires you to test something... so to say 5% is significant is not sensible here strictly speaking
the most horrifying part of existence
Geometry most horrifying
compactness! 
O did you learn it
I did learn the finite subcover definition yes
though only for R^n 
idk how it goes for general topological spaces yet
I mean, this is good enough for most cases
Manifolds are all locally R^n 

Discussion 2
Discosession 2
same exact definition for general topological spaces!


deadline very close + burnout 

Click here to complete your hw in minutes for free
www .safephishingsite .oops
up until like grade 5 i didn't know you breathed through your nose i thought everyone breathed through their mouths
so whenever breathing came back to manual mode, like if i thought of breathing or something, i'd start breathing through my mouth and people would ask what's wrong
in my defense breathing through your nose is practically imperceptible and its not like i had some way to bring it into conscious awareness. because if i brought breathing it into awareness you would just end up with the problem in last message.
and its like what the fuck were other people just born with this knowledge? did somebody just tell them early? did they pick up on it from their body and i couldn't because im stupid?
??????
gonna be real thats a big skill issue
discrimination outside examination
That's actually sad knowing how much not breathing through your nose affects physiology of your jaw bones and such, esp for young ppl growing up
does not work
a
a
Given a set of K numbers, all of which are not 0 (mod K), is it true that at least one subset of this set will have a sum of 0 (mod K)?
I thought I could trap this cat but this cat very smart
Will use different bait next time
I have a drawing app, where the pen paints where the mouse moves, but since the mouse is quite jittery the lines aren't smooth as it should be, I don't really know what math topic to look into to calm down the jitterness without affecting turns (every mouse movement x,y axis is saved)
Im guessing its an anti-ailising issue, no idea how AA works, but its what you want to look at
Like computer screens are all just little squares so doing curves is hard, you need to add like grey pixels around curves to make them look smooth
i believe so. apply pigeonhole principle to the “partial sums” of the list of numbers
I can see that, in one app where it looks like it has blurry edges around curves but that's only on actual curves, in my app the lines look jiterr-ish even tho its a slight up and down
But i'll look up anti-ailising for now, thx 👍
Let's take prefix sums
Clearly, each prefix sum cannot be equal to any of the prefix sums before it. As a result, there must be K distinct prefix sums mod K, because if there was a duplicate prefix sum, you could just subtract the previous duplicate and get 0(mod K).
As a result, at least one of these prefix sums MUST contain 0 (mod K), if the size of the set is at least K.
Is this logic right?
how is the first thing clear?
it sounds wrong lol
based on the sentence after that i presume you mean not equal mod K, not just not equal as integers
for a counterexample take K = 4 and the 4 numbers as 2, 6, 10, 1
its not something i did on the regular. here and there i'd remember the act of breathing and then i'd look stupid. normally i'd breathe through my nose but for the reasons i mentioned previously i couldn't consciously pick up on it.
I think you should stop worrying about it and move on and cherish the precious life and live it full
Hey guys, I was wondering whats the best method and what the best websites are to revise for my maths GCSE in 2025
Before revise you have to learn the full course
you're in on it aren't you
Wdym
stop worrying and just enjoy myself? you thought i wouldn't catch on?
Whatever I said was with good intention
Hello, I don't think this fits into a math question channel.
Anyways, this is a question geared towards people who have walked a similar self study path that I am walking, unless if you have good advice to give regardless. I left off at Single Variable Calculus at college and now I'm revisiting Math, currently working through Stewart's precalculus. My goal is to get through Calculus 1, 2 and 3 on a more rigorous level of just knowing the methods of Calculus, with hopes of going further to Real Analysis if I can hack it.
My question is, what should I look for in terms of pitfalls or advice as to not jeopardize my self learning because of the lack of a guidance figure like a professor. Is it even feasible past Calculus 1 to learn past formal methods, writing proofs with no one to tell me if they're correct.
I suppose that this is a question to set up my expectations for the future and to know what to do when in the situation of ambiguity that comes with self-study.
I'm already on the sort of journey of self study, but right now I'm in extremely familiar waters, but I won't be when I attempt to pick up Apostol as my second intro to Calculus
people have done it before
but why not just post your proofs on this server and ask if they are correct
legendary response, im probably too scared to do it which is why i didnt even consider the possibility
you're right though, i honestly should just use my peers as guidance
a lot of smart people out there
And also us!
But yeah, what Lochverstärker said, people post their work for feedback all the time in this server.
yeah, I'm glad to know that my goal is somewhat realistic as well
Finally a worthy opponent for cat lovers
From my observations the biggest challenge people have with self-study is the pacing.
In a structured course you know how long you're expected to spend on a given piece of material.
(i actually only own 1 cat but no dogs..)
On their own I've seen people spend a month on one section which a typical course would deal with in one week.
is that a bad thing?
Depends
it is, though i also want to mention that in my experience the starting part when it comes to proof-based math is the hardest
it requires a different mode of thinking
But there's a lot of math out there, and if you spend 5 years on real analysis and then 5 years on linear algebra, you won't get to functional analysis before you die of old age
what outsider said plays into this, because people will then struggle for too long
during my first semester i didnt really get a lot of things but we just continued
and in retrospect they are all very simple
but it just took a semester to click
i dont know how to emulate this with self-study
Yeah, I'd say the desire to just hammer at one thing until you master it is counterproductive.

