#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 69 of 1
What exactly do you want to do with this
Have a calulator on my deivce to run calulations
I guess Sage is good if you want to like do algebra and comp number theory
I don't think you should be using a CAS if base python/julia satisfies your demands without being annoying
A computer algebra system (CAS) or symbolic algebra system (SAS) is any mathematical software with the ability to manipulate mathematical expressions in a way similar to the traditional manual computations of mathematicians and scientists. The development of the computer algebra systems in the second half of the 20th century is part of the disci...
nice
Typically what you'd do is define in what sense it does make sense to compare them, give that relation a symbol, and derive a symbol for the opposite from that.
(You can also directly specify what it means for them to be different via an apartness relation, but that's a bit less common.)
So in other words, define what it means and pick a symbol for that.
what if I don't do that lol
like, trying to define a way to compare 5/0 to 6/0 in a way that is relevant is hard
since they're both undefined
if I'm understanding correctly you'd have to define them for that to work
If you don't do that, then what you write will be meaningless
that's the point lol
I'm trying to say that comparing something to undefined doesn't make sense
this is oxymoronic
or whatever the word is
you can only compare things youve defined how to compare
\neq is also a comparison operator
You simply say these 2 objects are not comparable in words, there is no generic symbol used for this.

it's like <>
there is no symbol that is conventionally used
I would not understand what your <> is meant
math has a convention???
Saying "it doesn't make sense to compare these" only works if you have some notion of comparison already in mind, it doesn't make sense to say it globally.
Maths is basically all convention :')
I mean it's more just me trying to say "I haven't decided how to compare these"
similar to how undefined is like "I haven't decided what number to make this"
Mathematics tends not to talk about things that way. Undefined is not "not yet defined", it's undefined.
You can provide a different definition that does define something, but that doesn't (generally) replace the old one.
i agree though, it's not conventional
someone may have seen it once, you can't rely on it being understood
well the other awesome thing about math is that I can make any authoritative statement I want lol
as long as it isn't inconsistent
never seen it, and i think its nonsensical to use such a symbol to mean what OP was after
This sounds to me like it means "in the context of the preporder we're working in, these elements are not comparable"
Which is a claim about some specific relation
Not "these elements are not comparable in some nebulous sense"
by introducing such a symbol, you introduce a comparison operator
but that's what they are asking about
I'm afraid you'll find that what you're trying to do does not actually make sense
that's 5 vs hamburger
no.
No; there's no preorder defined there
In math, you dont work in the universe of everything
cool with me lol
its always in some set, class or something
okay
"I don't have a relation to compare these with" is a statement that can be meaningful in a discussion, but it's not a mathematical claim.
In this case, a set with some kind of order would have been defined
Youre working in this set
and they would be using this notation to indicate certain elements of this set cannot be compared
what if I just say A x B is true if not A < B and not A > B and not A=B
in the context of reals
Then a classical mathematician will tell you it is never true.
wait fuck it couldn't I just say A∉ℝ
That said, you can define such a relation, and constructively it might make sense.
thats bad usage of symbols
im assuming youre in your original example with hambuger
Uhm, you said "in the context of the reals" so you're saying a real isn't a real here, so again, never true
ok lemme reword lol
\notin operator being used generally implies theres a universal set containing it youre working in
That said, I do think some kind of set non-membership claim could be what you want.
hamburger∉ℝ
Some more context would help.
thats bad notation unless its understood what universal set we're working in
working in the real domain
youd have to define it first
If you're working in the reals, then hamburger better be a real number.
since its nonconventional
but I just said hamburger∉ℝ
Because it's not clear what it is otherwise.
I'm so lost lmao
read what I said.
reals?
Okay, so that claim is false, and?
then hamburger isnt in it is it
Again, what are you trying to do here?
I'm trying to say you can't relate hamburger to 5 when working in reals because it's not an element of it
so you'd just say hamburger∉ℝ and you're done right
No; you can't talk about hamburger when working in the reals.
its like trying to get your int32 computer to understand 2^100 > 1
to give a loose analogy
The statement you're making is nonsensical
Universal set means all objects you will consider
No, you're trying to express "statement X is nonsensical"
so you dont consider hamburger
and it makes little sense to state hamburger isnt in R
But instead your whole statement becomes nonsensical, and hence doesn't say what you want it to
symbolically, its worse
what do I do then LOL
But again, unless you provide more context on why you want to do this, that's probably all we can say
Heuristically its completely tautological, what ur trying to say
if U is the universal set
then for any x, x WILL be in U
because all the x you can consider are in U
===
Youre trying to say the things not in everything arent in everything... well yes?
trying to correct when someone divides by 0
like if someone makes the mistake of 2(0/0)=2 I'm trying to correct it by replacing the equals sign with the correct relation
I know I don't have to do that necessarily
xy problem smfh
the correct thing to do
is to inform them this expression is not defined
to make sense of this expression, you recursively parse it (bidmas)
until you get to the 0/0 part
There is no correct relation symbol there.
if one part of the expression is undefined, the entirety is
wait so is there no correct relation symbol because nobody made one or because it's literally impossible to make one
and if either expression in a binary relation is undefined, then so is the relation
what's wrong with notating an undefined relation
It makes no sense to make one. Mathematics talks about structures. If you violate the rules of the structure, there's nothing meaningful to say.
I mean I would argue "you just violated the rules of the structure" is meaningful
what do I not understand here lol
have you programmed before
yea
or have an understanding
ok, then how should one go about writing a program that judges if my poetry is happy or sad
How can I socialise?
Once you've violated the rules of the structure, you are outside the structure. Trying to use a relation to denote that doesn't make sense, because the relation is inside the structure. You need to make some external claim.
so write a function that takes a string and returns a boolean
but satisfies my requirements
(This is when you take a specific interpretation of division by zero, by the way, where it is really not permitted. In other contexts undefined is treated more meaningfully, and e.g. there's a Kleene equality notation that permits both sides to be undefined.)
(In a setting like that, you could define the operator you're talking about but it would not see much usage because it is not very interesting.)
but under the hood, all they've done is gone and define it
this new undefined is like undefined2, a new notion of undefinedness
Yes, hence the different treatment of undefined.
is there a shorthand for this
No
you are obsessing over symbols needlessly
I love symbols
Mathematicians write their papers primarily in words, not symbols
So do I, but I think you're missing the point of them.
I think a key point we're trying to communicate is that regardless of whether this can or can't be done, it shouldn't be done.
The point I make here is that to do such a thing, you have to first define what happy and sad means
and then program it in
This could very well be via ML
ask chatgpt if your text is happy or sad and it will have an answer
I have seen a lightning symbol for contradiction
But this ONLY makes sense because it has been defined. If it hasnt, your program will fail to make sense of the question.
If that's what being sought here
not at all.
Nah, this is a different notion.
why 😭
Mainstream mathematics is not much different from how programs work in a sense
so the result is that the program would crash if you didn't define it, right?
Because you're taking attention away from a problem (that the expression is undefined) and giving a useless answer instead.
well it would literally tell u whatever the heck ur trying to do isnt defined
like youd try to invoke your is_happy function
and u didnt tell it what thats supposed to do
yes itd crash with this error
===
In the same sense, its nonsensical to talk about hamburgers before first describing the mathematical universe you're working in (which must contain hamburgers)
I think the whole hamburger thing was an unfortunate sidetrack.
can I do this
2=2
=> 2(0/0)=2(0/0)
=> step 2 doesn't make sense
I feel like we're going in circles here and I'm not sure why
the first implication does not hold
right
No, you can't.
since B is an undefined relation
and B is undefined due to 0/0 being an undefined expression
You can say "the claim "2=2 => 2(0/0) = 2(0/0)" is meaningless because the consequent is not well-defined"
Note that this is not "step 2", there is only one step here.
can I do this
2=2
=>2(0/0)=2(0/0) (this doesn't make sense, don't do this)
Is this idea springing from error handling, or it's just a mathematical curiosity
curiosity
Because I think thinking about it from an error handling perspective gives use. I'm not sure about otherwise
the key point mathematically
This still does not make sense.
is you can multiply both sides of an equation
by a number
you can divide both sides
by a number that isnt 0
these are the usual algebraic rules whether youre working in R or C
Thats the crux of why this is wrong
so my only option is to step back and articulate that what they just did doesn't make sense
only option?
like, break the 4th wall almost
in a way
more like the most sensible way to explain it?
you cannot divide by 0
and consequently that 0/0 is not a number
I mean in general
Yes, that is key to explaining this.
In the end, its the compiler or interpreter or whatever that has to complain and tell you about your error
and why the thing broke
Your program that broke can do no such thing
lol and this is just implementing try catch in math

Mmm, not really, the program comparison breaks down there since we tend to talk about non-termination when we're talking about stuff being undefined.
so basically the rule is just that when you point out that something doesn't make sense it can't be within the process
that makes sense doesnt it?
to sum it up
I think so
nonsense cannot tell you why it is nonsense
probably the most abstract thing I've learned like ever lol
wym
In computability, the reason a term may be undefined is that it computes forever, an error not amenable to try-catch.
thats true
Yeah, basically
cool
gonna write my thesis on mathematically breaking the 4th wall
With these kinds of questions, the more context you give of what you're writing, for whom, why, etc., the more productive help can be.
bet
in this case it was just curiosity so I really didn't have that part
Then it may be that the answer is "depends".
no, they meant a one word answer depends lol
if they elaborate
cool people elaborate
and math people are cool people
therefore math people elaborate
There's not much to elaborate unless you give a more specific situation.
damn I'm just never correct huh
Vector tucker…are you OK?
one joke

How do I get help I don’t see a channel for it
what is the command to wrap strings in latex?
Does anyone know if Greece ever intends to release more letters for us to use in equations?
How is analysis used in theoretical or computational fluid mechanics research?
How about in control systems?
it's the language of these fields
LOL
does analysis include linear algebra?
not initially, yes later on
How?
everything is written using objects or operations from analysis
it's like asking "how is swedish used in sweden"
LMFAO
Yeah literally you can't write down a problem in fluid mechanics without analysis
I'm sure you're right
but like
can you give me references or example papers or something so I can see it myself
Or just examples of how analysis is used
Do you know whether it's used in controls or not? I would assume so since controls ties in pretty closely to optimization
even most basic dynamical systems are nothing but a set of differential equations (that's for control theory and such)
you can't imagine working with those without analysis
I just looked up "fluid mechanics analysis"
here's a random paper https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045782596010882
You can see that it involves a lot of analysis and linear algebra
Also numerics
I see
Yep!
I see
How selective are grad schools? 🥲
I want to study this shit soooo bad but my grades are mid
you can just read a book on these topics if you want to
It doesn't feel the same
I struggle w self-studying anyways, can't maintain the discipline
Fluid is physics
Physics boils down to differential equations
And you study them by using analysis
Well that was straightforward

But insightful in a 4head kind of way
But like
Okay I guess what I don't understand/know about is
What are the practical applications of analysis in those contexts? Like, how do you use it?
In my head I can think of a vague example
You have a set of DE's describing some system
Perhaps an analytic solution is hard or impossible
But you can still analyze the behavior of the solution using general analysis theorems and whatnot
And use it to glean information about the system
For instance, how do you show there's a solution to Navier-Stokes (equations for fluids)
Well you start with an approximate solution. You integrate with the heat kernel and the Duhamel formula for each iteration. Eventually you converge to the real solution.
That's analysis. Calculus. Approximation.
The art of analysis is approximation
That's sick
Exactly the type of answer I was looking for
Thank you
I know about fluids btw don't worry LOL I'm a mechE student
What's the heat kernel?
Heat kernel, or more accurately the heat semigroup is a time-dependent linear operator. When you apply it to a function you get a solution to the heat equation starting from that function
Navier stokes is basically the heat equation with a transport term

Does anyone know why a negative number multiply by a negative number gives a positive number?
because -1 * -1 = 1
multiplying by -1 is like rotating the number line 180 degrees
so 2*-1 = -2
which is 2 on the number line rotated by 180 degrees around 0
if you do two 180° rotations, you get to 360°, which is a full turn and back to where you started again
so -1*-1 = 1
and therefore two negative numbers multiply to a positive number
Thank you😁
if you're interested, this idea of rotation brings you to the idea of complex numbers
if you consider rotations by other angles
Okay
How would we argue this for other rings or fields, like the p-adics?
Not every number system enjoys all the properties of complex and reals
Conformality for instance
@karmic burrow
This is cute the first time you hear it, but horribly inaccurate
Multiplying by -1 is a point reflection through the origin
I'm not often a nerd emoji user but I'm tempted to give this reply one
in the complex plane, multiplying anything is a rotation.
Rotations are also reflections
well, anything with absolute value 1
what is the reflection for 90 degree rotation
It is the 2-reflection defined by two hyerplanes meeting at a 45 degree angle of separation with their intersection orthogonal to the plane of rotation
that's literally the same thing as rotation by 180° lmao
Or the spinor (1+i)/sqrt(2), mapped to the appropriate plane
For now
we count 2-reflections as reflections eh
You didn't have a problem when I said point-reflection
I already set the precedent for exotic (non-hyperplane) reflections
so composition of reflections
Yes
how about an actual reflection
What about them
right there is no single reflection to create a rotation so I'm tempted to say ally gives a better answer here
anyway multiplication by -1 as rotation by π is absolutely valid within the complex plane imo
And? That's irrelevant
I'm viewing -1 as complex, not real
There's no single force to apply and lever length to use to generate a torque
Determining one, freely, then absolutely Determines the other
anyway I'm more interested in why you think ally's answer is "horribly inaccurate"
Because it doesn't generalize
if you're viewing -1 as a real number acting on the complex plane, then you are probably more correct
it does absolutely generalize
-1 stops being a 180 degree rotation
It doesn't stop being a point reflection through the origin
in the complex plane
it does to any vector space over C
I'm pretty sure
yeah
What about R
it's true there too
no it's not
It is absolutely not true in R^3
you're right about R
oh I guess a point for wraith is indeed in odd dimensions
I'll admit the definition is more general than I first thought
but when I think about scalars I only think about reals and complex
anyway all this is truly nerd emoji moment
we were just in two different base fields
Yes
you are in a MATHEMATICS DISCORD SERVER
you are also the nerd emoji
even in mathcord there is a pecking hierarchy we must adhere to 
we are all below daminark
I'm afraid that after my EGG arc comes to a completion I'll be retreating to the catacombs, they have kept forbidden GA from me and I must release the knowledge
and you
I think I now realize what you meant
To describe it as a single reflection is a bit cumbersome, but a 180 degree rotation corresponds to an (n-2) volume reflection; i.e. a line-reflection in 3D. This is distinct from multiplying by -1 (which, at least in 3D, can be thought of as a sandwich product with the pseudoscalar of VGA, the PSS of VGA is the origin in Mirror Space PGA, and thus -1 is a point reflection through the origin
Through the origin it's simple, everything adopts a -
Homogeneous coordinates makes it easy for every other point
it works if ur considering reflection through a n-1 dimensional space in n space
i think
no wait
n-2 maybe

Yes n-2 is a 180 degree rotation, like I said
oh yes i should read
We only get (n-2) volume-reflections from 2-reflections when the 2 hyperplanes left invariant by the reflections are perpendicular and intersect in an (n-2) dimensional space
[And the rotation generated is twice the angle of the Mirrors], Thus we only get 180 degree rotations
In 2D, it's a point reflection, and thus point reflections in 2D are 180 degree rotations
What is latex
For C^N, we have N different 180 degree rotations being applied when we multiply by -1, one in each complex plane. This n-fold rotation isn't really the same as the idea of rotation we began with, it's the composition of many of them though so it's not too far off.
That is, it's a rotation in the same sense that [general] rotations are reflections
And for R^n, we have the C^floor(n/2) case, plus one last reflection
it's the software that lets you render pretty mathematical equations
for example [x^2 + 1 = 0]
mollifiERIC
Hey its Eric!!!
Nope, but what do you think of my reflection rant

the computing nerds wont let u off for that one
I'm letting him go because he's Eric
Idk what you were talking about but SCHWARZ REFLECTION PRINCIPLE
And because he answered me
Wait what
What did I say that was wrong
is it not also the software
idk, wikipedia calls it a software system
ig, when people say software
i think of like
something that appears in my taskbar as an icon 
silly me
so python is a software?
yes that counts ok
Because I have some stuff like matlab installed but no icon for
lol
I feel like in general it would be a language but the stuff you download on your computer in order to run python is software? 🤔
Not really sure
well theres like
python something something in cmd line
that feels more softwary to me than latex..... but i know little about latex actually
No
in any case, i suppose this is the most helpful answer 
Python is a language, which is a standard
ok but what about the compiler
The interpreter is a software
Is latex a standard which (potentially) different softwares adhere to, or a specific program
well like idk
i think u install some plugin in your IDE
to compile it
i know too little 
I feel like latex is a specific program
like to interact with it, I know of no such thing as 'latex'
I unknowns it is too
you use overleaf, visual studio, whatever
Overleaf just runs latex on their servers
Sure, but you probably don't think about the drivers you use
Or the dozens of pieces of utility software under the hood that your OS launches
But that's all software as well
A simple example is OpenGL or DirectX, those are less pieces of software and more standards for what the actual software (the drivers) should implement

In this case, it's the difference between a patent and a product utilizing the patent
That is a very close and appropriate analogy
@marble bobcat
#help-1 message
Fyi, they aren't really trying
Can you make jokes on this server?
besides you, nah
Good morning
Thats so messed up
IM SORRY
no i said sorry
No no no
What are you folks working on today? 😀
You hurt the burritos feelings :((
My feelings are good no worries!
What the hell.
Stochastic Processes
Nice
It's much harder than I expected
Like I really have to review my LinAlg and Prob well
I dropped out of a maths master’s because I had that class and did not even know calculus at the time.
Don’t ask me how they even accepted me because I have no idea.
Oof
It’s OK I got a full refund for the program
Taking real analysis is recommended before taking this class
Yes
Nice
I will self study maths and further maths a level
Going through the book
I really enjoy mathematics
That's great! I hope you enjoy your journey
I want to self study more as well but I have to cram because of uni
I really enjoy mathematics as well
Are you based in the UK?
Nope US
I'm a bit torn between RemNote and SuperMemo atm
thank you for your opinion
Anki uses an algorithm so that just when you are about to forget the flash card the flash card pops up again to solidify longer term memories.
Yes it's really cool
That algorithm comes from a software called SuperMemo. When I looked into it, I found a polethera of other techniques for learning things in the long-term
People use SM-2 and SM-5 which are open-sourced but SuperMemo is currently running on SM-17
It's mainly on Windows only
I’ll look into it thanks
Ofc!
Beware though- don't expect to get a lot out of it immediately
You'll burn yourself out if you do that
It has a steep learning curve and the UI is very old looking
But
If you're willing to deal with all of that, it's definitely worth a shot
Let me know how your journey goes! I'm curious to see where you go
wow
Elo
so i have a math question
Something has been troublign me
So I have been getting into Deep Learning
and I have noticed that there are many things that I was not aware of earlier that I need to know, especially in Linear Algebra and Information Theory
I wonder how can one get along with Deep Learning while sustaining to read through Linear Algebra
Suggestions?
One thing I do know is that I can skip theoretical formal treatment to Linear Algebra
Well apparently this book is designed for people wanting to learn LA for ML
#linear-algebra message
Thanks, I will give it a look
I am just done with Mathematical Stats, and I thought many of my problems will go away but then LA struck me too hard
Was not expected
yes you are right!
Probability challenge!
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4673514/the-probability-of-throwing-the-same-value-value-not-fixed-on-a-n-sided-fair
quick question: are the hyperbolic functions defined over the complexes
you can define them over complex numbers if you want, if that's what you're talking about
i mean by definition
Onenote works fine for me
there isn't a single definition
cuz i'm putting down its domain and range
ohhh
hi
Obsidian, notion, concepts ...
I dont see what you are talking about
I see it now
the image of the corresponding functions
inverse tan for example is a partial function because it isnt defined at a couple of points
if you click on the link for each function with domain S it tells you what S is
I cant find a channel that does "Theory of Computation" is there any channel here that works with stuff like Finite Automata?
bruh xd
#discrete-math might be fine, if you have a more theoretical problem, you may consider #foundations instead
what do you guys think are the differences between the learning outcomes in a course named "differential geometry" vs "euclidean and non euclidean geometry"?
What exactly do you mean by learning outcomes here?
The two classes certainly cover different material I would assume
as in the content you might expect to be covered
sounds good thanks. i figured out my question for b4 so ill use this for the future 👍
"Differential geometry" could cover anything ranging from geometry of curves and surfaces in 2 and 3 dimensions to (smooth) manifolds and/or Riemannian geometry or such, assuming it is the first such course at any institution
This can require a certain amount of prerequisites, and can often be an advanced course
"Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries" might focus broadly on plane Euclidean geometry and alternate geometries that came into being (hyperbolic geo, spherical geo, etc.) at a (presumably) elementary level
Something like Coxeter's Introduction to Geometry can give a reliable guide
I would also guess such a class would have lesser prereqs
it could also be more general looking at n dimensions
depends on the course
Ya'll make some good points
Hmm, I've generally seen courses of this nature to stress more on plane-old (coordinate-free) Euclidean geometry from school
To bring "non-Euclidean" geometries in contrast
I think I'll go with diff geo
As the ones that break the parallel postulate
Shock moment when they say parallel lines intersect at infinity
If you're trying to choose between classes, best to check the course curriculum, prereqs, etc. first
Well it's not all that bad if one stops assuming different geometries from the perspective of Euclidean geometry
It seems wack when we try to "visualise" a lot of these things but that's kind of the point of these alternate versions, that which cannot be visualised the same way can still be formally conceived and generate interesting math
(this is also true of higher dimensional Euclidean geometry I guess, although a little less so)
I think I have a hard time visualising spaces with constant negative curvature 
elliptic and hyperbolic geometry aren't that weird in 2d
Visual presentations still exist though, and they're of course handy
You can code up simulations where the space obeys different geometries
i like to think of it how the game hyperrogue does it
on what they call a "hypersian rug"
I've been meaning to play that game just to get a better feel for the Poincare disc model
maybe I should take computer graphics at some point
they have like a million other visualisations too
the game has so much content it's absurd
you can play in so many different geometries
there's even a fucking 3d mode

which game?
hyperrogue
Interesting
procedurally generated roguelike in hyperbolic space
in #old-network there's a CS server
that would probably be the best
Honestly it’s half math half computers so was unsure haha
yeah we dont have an explicit channel here
some topics can fit in certain channels if you squint
like computability can go in #foundations
but unless you have a specific mathematical POV in mind, youre probably likely to have more success in a space dedicated to (theoretical) CS
Riemannian geometry of n-space, metric tensors, various curvature concepts and their relationships, covariant differentiation, geodesics, parallel transport.
what would this be in terms of "difficulty"
im taking this next year
First course in Riemannian geometry, definitely an advanced course but I can't really put a number on it
Broo
I have a question
One day at flight school there was a man who wanted to sit on a jet plane named O S N A I R L I N E S and when he saw the word he was confused by the seat number 1895. If the word O S N A I R L I N E S is rewritten as much as possible then the letter 1895 is
??
The right answer S??
Or N??
Woof
what is this question
a man saw a word and got confused by a number "1895"

from itertools import cycle
letters = cycle("OSNAIRLINES")
i = 0
for c in letters:
i += 1
if i >= 1895:
print(c)
break
>>> N
word = "OSNAIRLINES"
print(word[1895 % len(word) - 1])
>>> N
Hello, I wasn't too sure where to post this question but it felt the best fit for here. I am a first year, almost second year math and physics student and I was hoping to study GR. However, before even jumping into GR I wanted to understand the math prereqs that I need. Because I want to have a strong understanding of the material before going into the subject. At the moment I am learning topology from munkres' book, I am also in the process of studying from analysis on manifolds by munkres. For my linear algebra background I have gone through hoffman and kunze and LADR. So what is recommanded I do next, after the topology and analysis on manifolds. Thank you
analysis on manifolds and linear algebra are the most important things, you will also need to learn a little bit of Riemannian geometry for GR (this is like, the next step after analysis on manifolds)
Stuff about metric tensors / connections / geodesics / curvature
And that's about all you need for GR
knowing some basic stuff about the wave equation from PDEs couldn't hurt either
Get this book
https://www.amazon.com/Semi-Riemannian-Geometry-Applications-Relativity-Mathematics/dp/0125267401
for riemannian geometry is differential geometry a requirement?
tbh I would imagine so
yeah but differential geometry is literally like
analysis on manifolds + riemannian geometry
those are the two areas of differential geometry
Oh I see
and what about tensors? We saw them a bit in our linear algebra classes but then I looked online and the physics one was a little different
they'll get covered in the way they're needed when you do more manifolds stuff
and riemannian geometry stuff
I am actually in a roundabout here. I'm finishing my undergrad, and applying to MSc programme. I have been doing both CS and Maths my whole life, studying both on high level in HS and doing a double-major degree. But I don't really see a way to continue. Has anyone switched field (CS to Maths, and vice versa)?
I got admitted to CS PhD track where I am allowed to take virtually any courses that I like (include, say, homology), but I'm still not sure if this is the path I wanna go. On the other hand, fundamental maths is a bit, say, too fundamental to me.
What do you consider to be fundamental maths
Good question, but I think everything covered in a Pure Maths programme
Say, for instance, Differential Geometry 😄 (I know anything can be applied, but that's another story)
but you mention homology?
As an example. Also they found a way to use it in CS, so I guess it's not so good of an example
Hard to say. If you want to learn maths without learning pure maths you're kinda going into the bushes
I mean there is lots of interesting applied mathematics as well
You should not confuse applications with rigor. There's a lot of applied maths that relies on rigorous foundations
but lots of pure mathematics becomes applied mathematics later, and it helps to understand pure mathematics (as you give the example of persistent homology, this is something where having a background in algebraic topology helps immensely, even if now stuff in persistent homology has been exposited about in a more applied way)
exactly, with topological data analysis and all
One of my phd friends is doing tds
I learned from my thesis that it's soo useful to have a good foundation in Maths, but if I go beyond, I will need some good courses. I cannot just learn from books.
You can just learn from books. This discord is pretty good about it
And if I have to learn advanced maths, better do it now than latter
There are many highschoolers here just learning from books
Uni courses in the end are to make you become a self-learner
If you're already at phd level everything is just self-studying
If you have any questions you can ask here.
I think it'd be fine to take analysis, but it depends on your specific course
It might help to email your prof to ask if there are any specific prerequisites they recommend
Ah
Yeah it's probably fine
You could front load with abbott.
@queen forge
yes.
the reason math pi exists is because the old people who created math decided to not measure the circle because it was too hard.
they were too bias in their thinking.
so they put a point decimal to it that went forever.
what I found fixes that.
so that the circle can be stable and it can be measured like that.
<img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/71/Euler's_formula.svg/180px-Euler's_formula.svg.png" alt="Euler's formula.svg"/>
They proved pi repeats infinitely, by analysing what it even means for things to repeat infinitly and stuff, I don't understand it but yeah
t = t3 + s + m cubed by itself.
you start by surrounding the entire thing by a cube with this equation.
This guy has some interesting content on numbers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elvOZm0d4H0
You might like that
get out some paper and do it with me.
w + y + d = lt1 with pi,
then t = t3 + s + m cubed by itself.
Yeah sorry im lost lol
theyre talking nonsense dw
Well, not entirely. There are graduate courses, or even beyond that there are certain types of conference that are basically just a very advanced classroom course/courses (where everyone is auditing). I'm not sure I'd call that self-study so much as choosing to attend an optional class.
It is mostly self-studying in the sense that even though you are being taught the material, the material is usually advanced and filled with details that you can't get a proper understanding of the subject unless you self-study. This is opposed to like undergrad level where just paying attention in the class is sufficient to get an understanding of the material.
hey guys... do you ever feel like you overanalyze problems/theorems??
That's what I feel like rn because i legit take hours thinking over a simple theorem looking for different approaches to understand it, and never feeling satisfied with my understanding of it.
for example, the quadratic formula.... straightforward but i still wouldn't say the concept is clear in my head. if someone quizzed me on it, I would be able to answer confidently, but i can't stop thinking over it until i am forced to move to the next topic...
just wanted to know if you guys go through the same thing
feel free to think, but don't think uselessly and aimlessly
after a while you know whether some kind of thinking is likely to lead to nothing
i dont think i have that ability lmao
this kind of thinking makes my concepts really strong, but there are other ways to strengthen them without thinking for hours
whatever you enjoy do it
You will know when you rush yourself if you have a deadline
for me my time is mostly spent on proving theorems myself
if I can prove it myself without consulting the proof, I understand it well
my mind usually goes back to previous foundational concepts and i keep going back to them... it really slows down the thought process
that is good advice but i feel really sluggish at this pace
sounds like you already know what to do
maybe i do... idk. im kinda lost rn. all my efforts to stop overthinking go in vain but i guess i have to try anyways
I can't really offer any validation of your methods. I can only speak of myself. And that there are so many more things to prove and learn and I can't wait to get to them
thanks a lot for taking the time to have a conversation. it cleared my mind up to some extent
will get back to studying... what else can i do lol
That's how I learned, especially Olympiad stuff: while one spends hours to solve 10 problems, I solve 1, then think about how to create 9 more
It gives you the ideas and tricks of the proof, which is are far more important. But try to limit yourself to a few hours only, then move on to something else. Find something new to overthink about, that'll be more productive.
Could be overthinking , or unproductive thinking ,
I used to have this problem of being inefficient with theme generation, for me my issue was doing overly complex problems ,
so details obscured the theme I was truly interested in .
E.g learning about the theme of organisation from attempting advanced bijection Q , totally unnecessary and would be much easier if I just started with a simpler problem with less distractions
Personally I never focus on individual problems , only the themes behind those problems
i.e thought processes which lead to solutions. i.e . Decision making processes like organisation, chunking , simplification etc
Also
I have much more thoughts than this to share on the topic if your interested
Kinda
For me, answering the questions are easy
But I don't really understand the concept of it
I don't even know what its used for

satisfying

is there a difference between how I should treat help-forums and the individual help channels? Are the help channels more of a one to one forum where we identify the challenges of the individual and help remedy those and the forums more general where we post the general thought process in solving a problem? Or are they practically the same?
ok, ty
Hi
Wait till you find out about complex fourier series of the simpsons

wdym by "math people"
how?
i dont think everyones like that
or even close to a majority
But you think a significant portion are like that?
It also depends on how you interact with them.
I mean yeah, I've heard something like this being the case in places.
not sure if ive experienced it.
what maths communities have you been involved with where that's the case
syndicate 
Did you like see a toxic subset of comp math community
no i was just wondering where the bad experience was from
not trying to debate you
yes
how to gain brain cells?
i like math people but hate math 🙂
interesting
no i get this
it always feels weird to talk to math people for some reason
I hate talking about math to math people sometimes
i cant place my finger as to why though
Even here talking about math is often frustrating
I don't quite have this
I kind of have the opposite issue
With exception of like 2-3 math grad students I've met
The math grad students in my classes don't seem to want to talk to me
But the CS grad students I've met have been the nicest people
And then fellow undergrad math majors seem to be very hard to meet, despite taking math classes 💀
i sort of have this; the ones in my dept are warming up to me
Talking to other undergrads in my uni would be fine except that most of them just ask about what classes to take so its like 
All the pure math people I've met in my undergrad classes have been very closed off
oof
Yeah
I've taken more grad courses than the average undergrad so they really only want to take about classes with me
like please stop asking me about my classes thats the last thing i want to talk about sob
i can rattle off fun facts maybe
And we also have no real math club which sucks
I started one
good
oh i see
But running one is one thing
I would like to be like "head empty no thoughts let's go meet fellow math people"
Rather than worrying week after week about upcoming topics and making presentations
yeah
The CS theory people I've met have been nothing but lovely
And so have the profs
But the math grad students + profs have been hard to interact with
Maybe it's a me issue idk
anyone know the best free data visualization software
Learn Python and use matplotlib / plotly
i’ve messed with that a lil bit
any good places to find tutorials?
I have always found the idea of a math club funny
when you're already in a math dept
do you mean that the department ought to already have some sort of regular events that undergrads can come to
there are many such events I have been to. like halloween party, end of month tea party, some beer competitions with other depts
I think it's nice to have talks that undergrads can understand + a way to meet fellow people in the major outside of classes
Yea see we don't have any of these lol
there should be graduate lounges
or undergrad lounges
or faculty lounges
people pop in and chit chat or eat lunch
Undergrad lounge was always very dead and not a good hangout area
And now math building is undergoing renovations so lounges and such will be closed
dang thats rly nice
my dept does not do this 
We (the undergrad club) have to do all this ourselves using funding from the dept
we also don’t have an undergrad lounge 
we have other two lounges tho
yeah I guess it sounds nice but I have rarely been in a festive mood as I keep thinking about the projects I'm working on
I suppose other math faculty are also the same
chrew
unironically discord may be the best way to connect
due to its asynchronous nature and people can pop in while they are working / studying
We have a UIUC math discord
I once organized a discord for a class during COVID and it was best class I ever taught
Very dead + mostly used to ask about classes
no way
It's not official
it was rough to get the ball going but when it did everyone started talking and chatting about anything from math to entertainment
Multiple courses at UIUC have large official discords though which is nice in some aspects (easier to discuss than traditional forums)
Yea it's very dead lol
you have to know people and give people a purpose to talk. for instance in a class, discussing a problem with each other is a good reason for people to pop in
The discord for the math / algos club I started is also quite dead
if people don't have a reason to pop in they won't
Yea
Hard to come up with a reason. I had a brain teasers channel but like
Hard to find good brain teasers
It's open for other people to submit some though and that's helped a little bit I think maybe one gets submitted a month
My uni doesn't really have many undergrad math majors so its been rough to find peers that enjoy math for me as well. There are only 5 students in my honors calc 3 class and 2/5 are CS 1 is econ. so only me and another are actually math students :((
this why I double majored in math and cs. There's more opportunities for socializing on the CS side
yea all of my socializing has been in the CS side
which sucks sometimes
cause sometimes I wanna just hang with pure math people
Idk even know what's that like irl
yea
cs people are like monkeys sometimes its tough
is there a formula for the common ratio in geometric series
i double majored in finance (mistake tbh. I dont even get to take finance classes), so most of mine is through bus kids which well, tend to care a bit less about studies. still a lot of hardworking people but just not really the same haha. CS majors i have met tho have been cool people but yeah sometimes i just wanna chill and talk math
ping me next time
what is the ratio of a geometric series?
can you define it for me?
Who in here likes science
((n+1)th term)/(nth term)
I was thinking of minoring in finance cause I have friends who are into finance and my uni is one of the best for finance in the state
There's definitely space in my schedule but idk. I want courses that boost my interpersonal skills and a business minor might offer that
if there is room i think its prob a good idea then. Im still only a freshman but from my (limited) experience the bus classes are wayyyy easier so i wouldnt worry about that (even the "weed out class" at my uni is a joke compared to mv calc). You will need to do a bit of group work which can help you with that, and actual finance classes are fairly interesting imo. quant feels like a real career choice to me that is kinda the best of both world
i hated it, but bus public speaking did help me a lot
so while its def not as rigorous as stem there are still some really useful stuff there
I was thinking of taking public speaking one day
Pretty useful in all areas work related or otherwise
ye
I'm very happy to be friends with you all
@gray wedge
@pure cloak
hello
Hi, are there any ongoing undergraduate reading groups right now?
I'm starting a analysis reading group for over the summer if you wanna join
What book?
I'm quite interested actually since next semester I'm taking my first course in real analysis (yay)
henlo
what beginner maths algorithm can i implement to improve skill issue in programming??
Iterative variant of Extended Euclidean
i have no analysis background but may i still join 👀
can i use my institutional gpa vs overall gpa for masters program applications
Abbott is what I plan to use though I'm not 100% certain on it yet
yep it's an introduction to analysis so anyone is welcome
Use tao, use tao
I was thinking about that tbh
I stan Abbott
Never looked at Tao but Abbott is very well motivated with a lot of historical context
I read a couple pages of both and kinda just liked Abbott's more. though like definitely can't say for certain which is better lol
Is this a guy who wrote flatland
abbot's flatland was a really fun read to me back in sixth grade. it introduced certain concepts to me relatively earlier, which helped a ton in understanding many other concepts in the future.
yoooo, consider using mathematical analysis by zorich
I plan on reading that series this summer
Is Zorich's analysis readable for undergraduate level?
it's what the soviet and russian undergraduate students read
along with demidovich
it's basically real analysis at year 1

Any CPGE students in this server ?
It is quite comprehensive, but it starts at the basics and ends with vector calculus
Is [a,b] different from [b,a]
(↑Answered in the main discussion channel)
I was reading the article for the number 0 on Wikipedia, and think the second sentence is a bit confusing:
In place-value notation such as the Hindu-Arabic numeral system, 0 also serves as a placeholder numerical digit, which works by multiplying digits to the left of 0 by the radix, usually by 10.
So basically what this means, is that in Hindu-Arabic number system, a 0 elevates the number left to it to the next place
It took me about 2 minutes to figure it out
Classic Wikipedia math article
I agree, Abbott is quite good (and gentle for newbies)
Like Enderton 
Hi i apologize for this question but i really want to know. I'm 24, i've always sucked a math my entire life both because i'm a stupid idiot and because my teachers sucked ass. (i was always able to pass years because of my good conduct and because i was decent at other stuff)...
I've been trying to study math and practice on my own every year since i got out of high school and long story short i suck. I suck really bad i think i have some dysfunction in the brain or something. Can anybody confirm this that even though i keep relearning the same fucking shit every single year i still can't solve simple stupid problems without having to be explained a concept before?
For example, i can learn most concepts, i can learn the algorithms to solve stuff, for example how to factor, how to solve for one variable, equations, inequalities etc. But the absolute first moment i need to apply anything to an actual problem i go full fucking useless piece of trash.
I even tried brilliant cause i thought maybe i needed cute pictures. I failed a simple v=d/t problem even though i already knew how to solve for any of the variables and how speed works. Same thing with most new word problems.
tl;dr how can i finally convince myself that i'm too stupid and give up? What is wrong with me?
i like math, and i need it for my job (programming) but i can't stand anymore how it makes me feel
a friend keeps telling me to push through and i always want to believe him but then every day i want to shoot myself dead in the middle of my useless brain because of my stupidity
I feel you. Math sucks
Math doesn't suck, it's beautiful when you understand it. I suck
Isn't that just memorizing the algorithm to solve those specific problems
It’s cool and all but it sucks. Deep down you know it
let's not project our own opinions onto other people
opinion: darq is cool
fact: darq sucks

Alternatively you hate your existence more than you hate math
Didn’t say I hated math. Just that it sucks. It kicks you when you’re down.
Someone explain to me what quarter 2 means, personally I think it means quarter past two but apparently it means something way different
Can it be that the way its taught sucks thou but subject is great
That's probably dependent on your mindset
Cause I get told to come at quarter 2 and I come back at 2:25 but get told to come back at quarter 2
Doing math doesn't inherently affect you negatively
Am I just stupid or can I not understand time cause quarter 2 either means 1:45 or 2:25
It does me 😝
Shouldn't ideally
“Quarter to” to me means 15 minutes before the specified hour. But they didn’t say to what? “Quarter to three”?
They said quarter 2 which would mean 1.45 in your terms, if they said quarter 3, then it would make more sense 2.45
Depends on the context that it was said in I guess.
I keep getting told quarter 2 at 2pm and I come back 2:25 thinking it’s quarter past 2 but apparently they mean 2.45
i think they were saying "quarter to" not "quarter 2"
If it’s like 3 and they say we’re taking a short break come back at a quarter to. I’d assume they mean 3:45
Oh yeah maybe, quarter to
That’s literally what I said 😳
with an implicit 3
So much easier when they are more specific, makes it hard to just say quarter to when it 2pm
Better to just say quarter to 3
Explicit is always better than implicit.
Well, that’s sums up everything cause it’s been confusing me for a while now
The one I hate is “of”. I never know if it’s before or after.
if this isnt skill issue 
math did nothing to u
and to be clear i dont mean math skill issue 
#discussion message I am a horrible person with too much freetime
I know I’ve said it in the past which is why I explicitly said “I didn’t say” referring to this current instance. 😉
Had I claimed to never have said that, I would have said “I never said I hated math”
but why are you in a math server when you seem to dislike math so much?
Feels like you've been saying that math sucks for over a month now
To each their own ofc. Not telling you to leave
he should leave though
<@&268886789983436800>
grow up
For the bants mostly. And occasionally I need math help from people when I’m programming because I’m hopeless at the maths part. This server has helped me twice so far 😅
bruh i was just checking some repo and i saw illum as a contributor
which one
together java discord bot
you like lexers i think
bro
that's not "some repo"
I was part of together java for like 3 years
I was staff there
I have 100k+ messages on the discord
I wrote up the first bot for it myself
holy shit 100k
how do u write bots in java
jda
ty
how old are you now
too old

Woof
too old
discord TOS violation
what?
massimo move
you just love telling people your age don't you
it's the only way I can boost my ego
because u joined discord like way before u were 13, i am guessing lol
We do not welcome pedos in this server.
I am over 13 now
That would be just banning you
technically



