#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 61 of 1
More concerning is the choice of font….
wtf is that font lmao
no
Ty
in this chat
you introduced this notion?
btw
if you introduced this
what's the motivation for using the integral sign tho?
like, do you know if it satisfies properties analogous to the integral?
i doubt he did
i think the fact that int = oint kinda defeats the whole point of using an integral sign to begin with
i conjecture that it was used bc it looks cool
sippppppppppp
Weird notation apart this seems false? Take F = F_p^2: if I’m not mistaken then only non trivial proper subring is F_p
So for any non zero f, oint f over F is just F_p
neither they both suck
@bright hill im thinking of joining the measure theory thing but the meeting time is kinda at 4 am for me...

early bird gets the measure
is it full
no
why
hmm
that's a bummer
we'll figure it out
are you sure you want to join the group?
coz we're still early up into folland
we're still at sigma algebras and stuff
$\sigma$ algebra grindset
.
well, yea
but we're supposed to read the material beforehand
and sigma algebras are next meeting's topic
ic
do we have any example of a field F that is not char 0 whose integral is 0?
if it's char 0 we can embed Z into it
and integrating over Z gives us 0
so the intersection will also be 0
if you get what I mean

why sully
ive asked u twice, someone else asked you too
where the heck is this definition from 
I've said twice
from this chat
someone gave it to you?
no
btw @ripe wasp you didn't have to fill up the questionnaire lel
I already know you're a committed self-learner :3
but since you did, do you think asking to read that section was too much?
Is this comic sans?
oh yeah
bruh dont ask me 
comic neue
Hey guys i am looking for some friends who are addicted to maths just like me, but i couldn't find anyone in my school so I came into this group. Anybody want to join please
pee whew what the hell just happened there folks

So you just happened to ask yourself a question about unions of intersections of subrings contained in ideals? What’s the motivation?
there is no motivation
Then why are you asking this question
This seems like a completely arbitrary operation
he denied that
.
or maybe not technically
complete mystery
i bet hes keeping it to himself because hes on the verge of a breakthrough
Hey morris 😊
it's not arbitrary...
why did you use the integral sign for this?
what about this operation is integral-like enough to warrant using the notation?
that's left as an exercise to the reader
lumin the next mizlang, question mark?
mizlang?
Guys have any of you got latex-workshop vscode plugin working?
If it’s not arbitrary you ought to explain what about it isn’t arbitrary if you want any help. Considering how convoluted it is im sure it’s not arbitrary and does come from somewhere but I can’t come up with that on my own
those of you who self taught yourself, how??
w private tutoring i essentially finished my school's syllabus and i wanna work ahead for uni since i've acc learned to enjoy math
but idk how to do so alone
just reading textbooks feels dry and i just can't dedicate myself as hard (might be shite textbooks too)
well there's no other way than to read a book, watch a youtube lecture, read someone's blog post on a topic, etc
youtube can be less dry, or khan academy, or different books
you'll have to adapt to the fact that you'll spend half of the time looking for information rather than just studying all the time
so better make a folder or something
and first year or so feels dry because there's not really many interesting applications to basic calculus/linear algebra
this too, so many times i've been hung up on stuff that I just had to ask my prof after a while bcz i couldnt find a good answer anywhere
tried khan and ngl i don't like it (might get lynched for saying this)
doesn't feel as rigorous as the normal classwork im used to
well theres more than one teacher/video on there, but fair enough
ive just ran into sal for now
doesnt have to be only resource also
what channel do you watch btw
if there was something like 3b1b but more depth, that'd be perfect
what topic are you trying to self study?
rn lin algebra
going to uni for comp sci
are u in the US?
nope, europe
ah
hmm
(not british despite my pfp)
there should be plenty of rigorous lectures on calculus/linear algebra which are recorded in class, when I was learning all of this I watched like multiple playlists of calculus/linear algebra
ive watched some mathemaniac, but maybe thats too close to 3b1b also
yea theres probably alot of completed LA lectures on YT
i thought the MIT OCW was a godsend, but then i realised that they were just saying shit and the students had to take it for granted
seems like a common issue
like even basic geometric interpretation of the determinant wasn't covered, whereas 3b1b does it really well
hence my hesitation for lecture vids
havent heard of mathemaniac, ill check it out
tbh if you ever find a linear algebra class that starts off with geometric interpretation of determinant it's either going to be a geometry-based linear algebra (which isn't going to last as far as applications are concerned) or it's some really abstract, high level view at algebra
geometric algebra?
no, geometry-based linear algebra
isn't linear algebra fundamentally a study of space and transformations though? i get the applications are sometimes more important but i'd hate to learn it without really understanding the roots
using matrices, dot products, determinants, linear dependence in R^2 or R^3 to say something about some parallelogram, a pyramid or something
ive found it helpful to use my intuition from group theory/graph theory, and of course theres the origins with systems of equations and stuff
like coexeter group matrices, lie group matrices
group theory? is that meant to be a pre-requisite??? if so ive gotta backtrack
No
its very helpful via group actions/representation theory, not sure about a prereq
Certainly helpful if you've learnt it to get a hang of abstract algebra if nothing else, but not a prerequisite definitely
ngl i know absolutely nothing about maths (still in HS for perspective), but if this is a fun subset i'll look at it in parallel
How did you do it?
Just install the package?
I’m on mac and it couldn’t the the root file.
Have you installed MacTex?
Youre able to write and compile a Tex document?
I see. As long as you have all your documents in one folder and accessing the file from that folder, it should work. Other than that, I am not sure. Try opening an issue on the Github page
nah section 1 was really short
and im fine with the group starting really slow
bc i needed to review anyway
i was kinda losing motivation bc of school stuff
and hws will be nice to make sure i don’t slack off

good good
we're gonna aggregate a bunch of interesting problems
(everyone can suggest a problem they find interesting)
they'll be in #problem-hitlist
I already sent you an invite btw
wait
I didn't wtf
lol
it's in a separate server
I sent you an invite
I actually should've mentioned we're organizing the thing in a server 
welp
no matter
hi

Hi!
Heyy..
If X,Y are complete metric spaces, with X_1 and Y_1 being dense in X and Y respectively, and X_1 and Y_1 are isometric, are X and Y isometric?
Not necessarily
Suppose X_1 is the interval (0, 1). Can you come up with different X and Y for this X_1?
so just [0,1) (0,1]
Those aren't complete
oh yea
Something like that though
oops
hm
how about completions of a metric space
Are any two completions of a metric space isometric
I hate these prove or disprove problems
R isometric to Q_p 
meow
Lol
U just sully but don’t even answe??
Oog
dont join and leave dumbass!
Yeah you’d need it
you can play later when yamin can
no i got first in the first game by a large margin
im a skribbl god
Wtf is this
that's you
yo wtf?
do you eventually improve at quickly understanding something you've never seen before

Congratulations walter
So im reading a book on dif eqs and im noticing that the author writes log instead of ln. Is this a mistake or a notational choice?
it's not an uncommon notation
If anything I'd be more shocked that you got as far as diffeqs without having seen that notation
So far I have only ever seen physicists do it, and I always assumed they just didnt care, however my math teachers were always adamant that log was for base 10
@neat lintel
,w int_0^H pi*(R/H *h)^2 dh
THEYRE ALL SIDEWAYS NOOOOOO
@long matrix not letting me access the itemType class
despite it being public
no signal in class
Dim is private declaration within class iirc
ull want to make a property
its complaining about the property not the class itself
I might just make it a structure
also chatgpt might actually be somewhat helpful
@nocturne tusk so instead of going
Dim itemID as Integer
You should do
Public itemID as Integer
That declares it as accessible from outside the class
Well maybe im missing something
Cant remember whats the diff between
Public id As Integer
and
Public Property id As Integer
iirc ones static, ones instance var
===
Also you need to instantiate
Dim item As itemType = New itemType()
public class variables

yh vb is rather silly once ur used to py js etc
iirc it bijects with C#, that be better to use
sick, ty!!
that tutorial probs help u a lot
oh god constructor methods
I tried ages learning how class constructors worked for python
never got it
yeah its
class is like a blueprint
instantiating a class
the way I've been taught in this class is to just have a single object
store it in a file
then clear it
its like a partial equivalence
is that the only thing in the file?
This is rly depressing lol TA links is a paper from 1935 and he’s like I hope this paper is accessible to you by now 
why is that depressing
100 years to go
100 years isn't too much more, since you already covered stuff from a couple thousand years back when pythagoras was around
turing was alive then
So was I
Im too dumb for new shit
Undergrad class?
You learn way more in grad school and at greater speed so it's nothing to worry about
Im too poor for grad school
I'm thinking he's just trolling
If ur good
Im not trolling
I think it's almost always free
If u get accepted to a phd program but i don't even have math undergrad. I had to read munkres topology, lang algebra, rudin's 3 analysis books, mac lanes categories for the working mathematician on my own. I am unemployed and I have no future plans
Im not joking i really did waste the past 7 years of my life reading stupid crap unguided on my own and im not in any school or program or future prospects or opportunities
What are you doing now
Im reading Lectures on Functional analysis by Helemskii
I have no job and no school
Where are you from, continent wise
Im in California
So I assume your future plan is to get a job
Ya i applied to be a barista
Is your aim to do math research?
I want to do that
I think it's a bit hard to do unaffiliated research
Ya i know. I want to be a part of some school but im poor and don't have math undergrad.
Fuck this and fuck you i have to read functional analysis in my free time
What do you do in your non-free time then
When i was working i had to do shitty work. I wasn't paid to learn math
Yes but you said you don't have a job now
Ya i can learn functional analysis and scramble to apply for odd jobs like barista or janitor n shit
If you're good at math, you can get good at programming relatively quickly
And get a programming job which pays better
You can get a certification from like freecodecamp
You said you've read - but would you say you're proficient in all you've read
if you are, I don't see why there shouldn't be a way to somewhere
somehow
u had some school to force u to be proficient. I can't afford school. U can get paid to keep learning math in grad school and do research. U can devote huge amounts of time these next several years to learning and mathematical maturity. I have to do odd jobs, get a programming job, do what i can to learn math in my free time, eventually get some money to go to math undergrad where the classes aren't gonna teach u nearly as much as grad school. Maybe in 10 years i can be where you are now in grad school and get paid to learn math at very fast speed
If you mean 'u' as in me - I can see you're likely to be more knowledgeable than me in many subjects judging from what you've read/reading
I should mean u as in this guy
I'm asking like -
I was not speaking to you
can you do most of the exercises in the books and so on
In fact, I don't even feel like explaining it
I don't read without doing exercises
like you can read a book and barely understand. or properly understand
Idk i wasted like 7 years reading them
My point is - if you really have learnt these subjects, I don't see why you can't get somewhere
Just... talk to people...
This is why
shuri is clearly not talking about research
ngl I have little clue how instutions and so on work
I am referring to say a phd yeah
but about getting a job
huh no
idk - i feel like you could right
could you?
I do
u tell me how unqualified and shitty i am. I obviously can't shit on myself because im not in grad school
in which case its just a matter of finding somewhere that'll say yes
The only time I mentioned you at all was when you said "too poor for grad school"
that implies some monetary aspect
Im projecting my anger
Yes i don't have math undergrad
that's knowledge and diploma, not money
No it's money

Ask them if you can just pay a small amount, do the exams, and get a degree
@tall minnow math undergrad is just money
I won't even bother explaining to you my life story but there is a 90% chance I was born poorer than anyone talking here
if they required money there's no way I could have gone into maths
anyway grad school doesn't require money, but knowledge and diploma and recommendation letters
Would this work btw
Thats the biggest bullshit ever
believe it or not, that's your choice
not mine
I neither gain nor lose anything from you not listening to me about how it works
@tall minnow maybe read this message and try to understand a new perspective of my frustration rather than saying some clever last word gotcha
why are you convinced its bullshit
no, maybe you read mine and every word
Doesnt sound bullshit to me
No fuck you

no one on admission board cares about how much money you have to go into PhD
Huge bullshit

are you saying this having spoke to some people
at various universities
or something
i have no experience myself, but it makes perfect sense to me they are after brains more than money
there are scholarships and whatevers offered.
not saying this is everywhere, but a good number of places at the very least
Clearly you wanna keep saying last word gotchas rather than putting in any effort. So i just wanna say ur not worth my time.
you were never worth mine

Likewise
Lmao "last word gotchas"
the absolute inability to disagree without calling everything BS
not a discussion but a shouting match
@untold sage basically this asshole can't not have the last word. Also his last word has to be a gotcha.
betting the guy is still raging over people instead of discussing the idea
See? He has to say a gotcha after anything I message. It's in his programming. He can't help himself.
What is your problem.
We're giving advice, not tryna gotcha you or anything
It won't benefit us.
I have bad depression and anxiety and i frequently take my frustration out on everyone in my life including my therapist and psychiatrist
You aren't tryna gotcha me but @tall minnow is
believe it or not I only care to discuss the idea of "too poor for grad school"
I don't care enough about you to gotcha you
you are just unable to handle disagreement
not true
@neat lintel go to a math department in any good uni
be polite to a professor
tell him or her to examine you in fundamental areas
talk math with him or her
get a rec letter
rinse and repeat
and then apply
good luck
u need rec letters to say that yea this kid does not have in his trasncript analysis but he knows analysis enough he wont fail qualis
for exampel
example*
if ur aiming for good schools i dont think u have a high chance to be admitted
but u can be admitted for masters tho
as sorta a bridge
finding a funded one in the us is hard (ig)
funded masters are very rare
in the US
ye
he can apply to canadian universities where funded masters are the norm
also consider taking the GRE subject test
if u do well it might sugget that indeed ur talented enough that u self taught all this shit by yourself
Thank you @burnt dune this is good advice
but u need rec letters to verify this
you need to takee exams
and have professors vouch that you indeed know this shit
@burnt dune yes those are good tangible goals that get me where I wanna go
yea i am assuming u want to apply for good schools ( as in ranking )
u wont be accepted into a phd program ig
just too many math majors that are jut better than you (regardless of skill but atleast on paper)
Idc about school ranking
Im shit
maybe you are but you can improve
your application
maybe a professor really likes you and if that happens and he is in some admission committe he would want to work with you
who knows man
main thing is
do math and improve at it
I have seen at least one immigrant family, with the husband trying to contact a professor about trying to get into grad schools
it didn't work out well as the husband wasn't prepared enough for an interview
one would need to be very ready upon meeting the prof
those are not easy books at all
if u do atleast half the exercises then id say your p good ig
preferably get a good GRE Math Subject score to show you're not just a crank
Ya i assume u need to actually read what the professor has wrote or actually show interest in what the professor specifically has done
yes
no
just be polite and show that ur actually not going to waste his or her time
thats the hwole point
also some professors are less helpful than others
be lucky ig
if u can have letters vouching that you got eexamined ( and did reasonably well ) in grad lvl analysis, algebra and some topology or whatever (ie the basic math)
then u have a shot at good (masters) i think thats just in my optimistic opinion
rather than a cold email from nowhere, probably a person could appear at lectures or talks given by a professor
uni campuses are often publicly accessible
then ask the professor if they are free for a lunch and talk
just literally go up and be polite
exactly
@neat lintel thats my two cents really hope u get somewhere and ig just do not give up
Thank you @burnt dune for giving helpful honest advice
deleriks stuff is important too like u NEVER want to sound cranky
in any way
make sure ur acutally half decent
say you just finished papa rudin
literally type up real analysis qualifyihng exams
do problems
see where ur at
math is about solving problems
proving theorems
if u cant do those but u know a thing or two it does not matter
@burnt dune ive been practicing https://jonathanlove.info/qual/makeit.html
A tool for accessing and compiling questions from past Stanford qualifying exams.
standfords qualis are gigafuck hard anyways
but the point is
ur self taught
so ur approach with math might not invovle much problem solving as much as just theory learning
thats not good at all
atleast for grad schools ig
but that ur already practicing so u know whats good so good for you
not really
not that it's easy but it's early undergrad
hmm?
no, most people don't have much idea of what high level or research mathematics is
i was about ask "wtf is this an undergrad qual"
its a grad qual
nvm

Why is every convex symmetric body in $R^n$ a unit ball wrt some norm
Functional Kitten
was casually mentioned at end of class but it's been bugging me
Oh I get the intuition I just don’t know how a proof would start
How is "symmetric" defined
Didn't someone ask this exact thing
symmetric wrt origin
I would look it up online but I don’t want to be spoiled with a full proof
I just want a direction to start with
Sorry I don't know the theorem/proof myself, but the last person who said this mentioned the Minkowski functional
Whats a good converter for pilot metro
yeah I've heard of something called steiner symmetrization which preserves convexity and in the limit as you repeat the symmetrization infinitely many times you get a sphere in R^n, perhaps this could be relevant?
Because if you scale up the "ball" you get the whole space. The norm of a vector is then how much you need to scale up to absorb the vector

One of my profs does research in convex geometry
and this is how he explained it to me
given a centrally symmetric convex body (compact convex with non empty interior) which contains the origin
you have associated to it what is called a gauge function
and this gauge function defines a norm
whose unit ball is this convex body
Lecture 10: Convex sets and gauge functions
Claudio Landim
Previous lectures: http://bit.ly/2Z3qzIM
These lectures are mainly based on the book
"Functional Analysis" by Peter Lax. Lessons 33 to 37 follow
Chapter 4 of the book "Applied Functional Analysis"
by Eberhard Zeidler, volume 108 of Springer's collection Applied
Mathematical Sciences.
T...
and the intuition of the gauge function associated to a convex body is precisely what delerik said before
this is the relevant wikipedia page
Is anyone else reading Euclid
this shit is metal as fuck
Yeah it is
Prof: I’m assuming you read the book, because it’s pretty damn good (he wrote the book)
Class: 
reads the book like gigachad
I have to write a book
Why are you writing around your sketch, as opposed to above and below it?
Unless you sketched it first and then wrote, that would make sense lol
the left is the dead zone
chad
had to do prop 17 book 12 for a final, it hurts your brain trying to keep up with all the proofs and what not
Hello
I’m doing algebra
I’m not sure where the 1 come from
If the coefficient is just x
3x is a fraction its just over 1
so when you multiply it by 1 over y it returns 3x over 1 * 1 over y which is just 3x over y
xxx=x^3
Oh
yes but every whole number is technically over 1
x over one times 3
im not quite sure what you mean, you want to know different ways it can be represented?
3*x = 3x
But if do 1/y
What’s just 1/y
Is that equivalent to 1/1
So y could be anything
Out of the fraction
Ahh
Mm
Brb
What does that mean
How is 3x merged with 1/y
It doesn’t make sense
3x*1/y
@ebon pelican
Still there?
So it’s forks to the right numerator
Does 3x merge with the 1
And or does it also merge with the y and that can’t be true because it must only be y at the denominator
So 1*3x =3x
/y
3x == 3x/1 so the one in the denominator of the 3x multiplies with the y in the denominator and the 3x in the numerator multiplies with the 3x in 1/y
its pretty much (3x*1)/(1*y)
^^ alot easier to comprehend with visuals like this
How did I go
i got a 25 on my last geometry test so we arent too far apart
<@&268886789983436800>
ty
How I had my finger on the ban button
Can arzela ascoli's assumption be weakened from uniformly bounded to pointwise bounded
Arzela-Ascoli establishes an equivalence between "F is compact in the uniform topology on C(X)" and "F is pointwise bounded and equicontinuous"
@fading pulsar
I have been lied to in the class :_:
was introduced just as uniformly bounded urgghh
This is actually false (the unit ball of C(X) is not compact although it is uniformly bounded)
ok imma have to reread notes
it's highly likely that I just misread them
Ok I see this in the notes, is uniformly bounded different from bounded?
No
isn't the actual thing you need like "pointwise bounded" but for compact domains this ends up being the same
Yes
oh i guess for locally compact vanishing at infinity its the same too
Yea I just noticed on the homework assignment he just tasked us to change the proof
I think it shows it for pointwise bounded
instead of just bounded
i see
I proved the inverse function theorem in class and I feel like it was a waste if time
Its such a technical proof
noooo haha it's good haha trust me
did you follow the terrible proof in Rudin
it's one of the most important tools for diff geo and diff eqs
What's wrong with the Rudin proof?
Isn't that the one that works in Banach spaces too?
(47) (48) (49) (50)
even the ideas
Do you prefer it to be more like Newton method?
/is there a reference for your preferred proof?
(Or are you gonna give it right now lol, I didn't realize "this is how I would prove the injectivity" was referencing something forthcoming)
WLOG assume $f(0)=0$ and $f'(0)=Id$ (use translation and linear map)
Then for x near 0, we have the fundamental theorem of calculus
$f(x)-f(0)= \int_{[0,x]} f' \approx \mathrm{Id} x$
So injectivity is proven
Delerik
Just need to write out $| | \int_{[0,x]} f' - Id | |<\epsilon$
Delerik
what's the dashed integral
how to write dashed integral in texit
I'm using the average integral
well you can understand
f' is so close to Id its average must be close to Id
this is how I proved it myself. In fact I bet others have proved it like this also
how did tao prove it
oh, he also uses FTC
yeah this is also why I like Tao.
he thinks naturally like me
just go for the obvious, like constructing real numbers by cauchy sequences
this is also how I would prove open mapping in complex analysis but there I split into cases of nonzero derivative and cases of the function being locally z^n
Does FTC work nicely for Banach spaces?
yep. As long as you impose regularity from Frechet derivative
the inverse function theorem in Banach spaces is proved in the same way
and in fact it is what I use to prove the smooth dependence on initial data for Picard iteration / ODE
otherwise proving the smoothness manually would just be messy
the most advanced / famous version would be the implicit function theorem in tame frechet spaces that Nash used for his embedding theorem
Arguably derivatives in general don't work nicely in Banach spaces
which leads to the story of fluid mechanics today
we don't use the exact theorem. But we use his ideas, especially the regularization to defeat the loss of derivatives
ty
Ja
lads how do I peak in high school maths
By going downhill afterwards
How does one go from 40% test scores to 70% in VCE Math Methods Unit 3 & Unit 4?
Im very bad at math
Proof it
You are on discord, what do you expect? Your grades go up because you ask on discord how to, rather then learning?
Second derivative test
learn
anyone got tips to get better on algebra and just in general solve equations faster and calculate faster etc I think it's basically basics
it will save time on a test
imo just practice the equations you wanna know
i dont really know any other way
no but like I made a realy dumb algebra mistake last time it went like (a^n + b^n) / c^n and I thought it was ((a + b) / c)^n
so I want to prevent this
oh
does it usually happen?
I guess if I am not too focsued or smth
Memorize the formula alot of times beforehand and write it down when you're solving the question
I didn't raely do it with the formula I most of the time know this is legal to do
if you want, I'm sure someone has generalized in clarke's direction as well
just as Ekeland generalized on Nash-Moser
and sobolev / holder spaces aren't exotic but what every analyst deals with
but I will settle for Nash being the most famous and impactful
and it's the idea of recovering regularity that still helps us till this day even when we don't actually use the theorem
Holder spaces are exotic ?
just confirming your opinion here
ok you are entitled to your opinion then
bruh
nope
look at the name of the server
ok
I think people in geometry are more familiar with C^k and Holder spaces
which expresses regularity / differentiation
Sobolev spaces are also like that (differentiable functions) but based on L^2 spaces instead. It's the setting for elliptic regularity which Hodge theory and PDEs depend on.
some areas of geometry actually depend a lot on sobolev spaces
like index theory for instance
and their connections to the topology of compact manifolds (stuff like atiyah-singer for example)
which is pretty cool
this is one of my motivations to learn about elliptic operators and sobolev spaces at some point
my motivation to learn about it is there's a dirac operator there
My motivation to learn about them is to get a feel of other structures on manifolds and their geometry. I’ve worked w a C^k structure (book exercises involved). I’m in a class for smooth structures. I’ve worked with analytic structures (class setting). I’ve seen others work w a Riemannian and Kahler and Complex structure (all independently). Never worked w a W^(k,p) structure until recently
New ball game
Im not motivated
hi my love
I have written an absolutely-stupid stats joke
Me, sitting at my desk doing frequentist statistics: ...
My wife, bursting in: WHO THE HELL IS EMILY
Sobolev spaces are built on common sense
My head feels kinda distant from mathematics rn thanks to a few videos on YT which talked abt the flaws of mathematics: Of how it is inconsistent, undecisive and flawed ._. Suddenly it feels as if maths ain't smth that great- it began to make me question if maths truly should be the thing I'm working on and studying.
We don't actually know whether ZFC is consistent or inconsistent. I think that most mathematicians believe it to be
What we do know is that ZFC is not complete
Therefore it's possible (and probable) for it to be consistent
godel and turing be like slapping their whole ass thought experiments
And also, ZFC is not all of mathematics
XD true that
There are many axiomatic systems and it's probably not too hard to swap the foundation, because of the way theory is built up

Like, if we were to find that it is inconsistent, we can always switch or modify, we don't have to 'restart'
yeah, since the reasoning should be similar
With paid learning services such as Brilliant, Coursera, Datacamp, Udacity, Udemy and so on, it becomes quite a struggle for me to decide which one(s) I should enrol for. To provide some context, I'm looking into exploring these learning forums to further develop my skills and knowledge in STEM, mainly Mathematics, Physics and AI (programming and coding).
One that stands out immediately is Brilliant, given how it's widely advertised, with claims of providing an interactive and hands-on experience. It sounds and seems great and all from glimpses of the platform from YT vids- but something that made me think twice was how other learning platforms provided actual certificates from Universities, such as Coursera. I wasn't really sure if people would really... care about these certificates when it comes to applications into Universities, or maybe for a job, so I wasn't sure if perhaps other platforms which provided certifications would benefit me more. Honestly kinda confused on which to pick 
Avoid paying for anything. People may or may not care about certification, but mostly not really. Your degree and past experience matters more.
was thinking that perhaps a learning platform would help me learn better and ahead of whatever is taught in the classroom. I agree that degrees and past experiences matter much more tho
Just pick a platform that will teach you what you want to learn. It's better to have a great understanding of a subject instead of some meaningless certificate. If you know things well you'll get into a good university and you will have a good career.

imo u should just use textbooks
i was really into self learning last year and i still am but i found the best way
is to just use free stuff
paid learning services teach the same things
one that i found genuinely helpful were the aops classes

Well sorry for any inconvenience or disruption caused, but just wanna ask whether anyone can help me in #help-22 🙏🙏 I'm afraid I wouldnt receive a reply if I dun post this message here
(Please feel free to ignore this message, and tell me if this violates any rules, I will immediately delete for sure)
wut. paid services...?
why would u even consider those? use this server
well, this server is mainly math oriented XD, there's still more
there are other servers
well, tbh even then servers may not be the best options to learning
also, idk what lvl u on but learning every topic is not possible anyway
but yea, like the dude said, read books and ask questions
youtube has enough lecture videos if u need
coursera has free videos. and if u need more there are some stackexchange threads that list lectures in many different topics
true that
high school?
yep
do math major. will be fun. and easy to study. tho the topics themselves can get tough 

education level doesn't stop anyone from learning, i'm also a high schooler and that's never gotten in the way of me pursuing my interests
dont sweat too much abt getting accepted into unis. ull be fine

tbh only thing that's stopping me from actually doing so is due to how all the information is scattered all over the place- it's like: "I know where I can search things up for resources, such as servers like these, YT, whatever, I also know where I can get help and practice- through textbooks, exam papers online and Wolfram's problem generator- but compiling and managing all of this is kinda a pain. This was why I thought a paid course where most info is already on the site for me would be best
ig it's a matter of "get gud"
It saves up a lot of time when someone has done the work to collect most of the information into 1 easy to access place.
mhm
i would like to read this book...
https://m.doverpublications.com/0486409198.html
i want to download but cannot find it online. also my school library and some more around the area don't have it. i could buy it but that will be the last resort. doesn't anyone know where i can find it online?
except libgen cuz libgen doent have it
It's still technically fallacious since you've already made the payment (sunk cost)
yes if only they informed their customers
Hi
Anyone here take smart drugs (nootropics) ?
Fr need to get my life together, Currently predicted CCB, in maths, computer science and business? ,. Fuck man, it's like 5 months in, I spend like on average 8 hrs a day on my phone, Really started to rethink my life choices, how can I get up to an A in maths😭
just try to set up a schedule it might help
but account for when life happens (eg getting sick, etc)
The key is to developed mental discipline in the face of adversity, countless failures, zero reward, and endless failures. If you can develop a Thomas Edison mindset of NEVER giving up you will get there.
Very debatable
true tho lmaoo
Moving from #math-discussion
I don't know if I get it ;_;
I think I'm doing something wrong
go back I don't look in other channels
I'm probably wrong and should have picked the smallest not largest
Ah, I felt bad because I didn't want to interrupt josemom2
nah
yo, can anyone help me? with bhaskara :/
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
You can literally just use wolfram or your calculator 
Do not troll/meme here if you are doing so.
How would you consider doing khan academy's math step by step (algebra 1, 2, precalc (trig, logarithms etc), calc, AP calc) as opposed to doing them at the same time?
how would you do them all at the same time
i guess alg 1-2 and precalc may be feasible
but you would be pretty lost in calc without enough algebra knowledge
also no need to do both calc and ap calc
just do the ap calc BC course
its the same as calc AB but with more content
Wtf is this😭
Icic
hello
I really need help understanding how polynomial ideals work
particularly, this question asks how I represent Z[1/6], I understand that this can be written as Z[x]/6x-1, but dk how to continue from there
.
#groups-rings-fields more appropriate
I also don't get your full question
like 'continue' where
like I don't understand how u approach the question
you haven't written the question
Anyways - post in that channel, ill take a look
you'll need to pick up the undergrad role
done!
Here's the context, this is about the start of the conversation
#math-discussion message
I moved to this channel worried I was talking over someone else and was told to move back
There are shit tons of Indians here
Because of people like you
“@everyone” to answer the question I couldn’t bother answering myself so I attempt to ping everyone
actually not everyone is lazy like you, so dont just assume anything @fading pulsar .
yeah, another rude rando to the blocklist

the person in your profile picture fits you
bruuuuh this man helped me
this man a goat
damn wtf
why am I only learning about this characterization now
makes so much sense
because then what about R^4
ternary inner product
This is how I learned cross product in a way
sounds like you're just learning exterior algebra with extra steps
wait it is exterior algebra
I am not understanding this at all. 
I had physics and just kinda suppressed that memory
yeah I am
And then at one point a friend of mine was like
Hey I get cross products now
Wanna see?
And explained it this way

the book is called multivariable calculus and differential geometry by walschap
pretty ambitious book that doesn't assume much prereqs but ends up doing diffgeo in considerable generality from what I can tell
I care less for R^3 but more about general Riemannian manifolds
in which case cross product is wedge product with the hodge star
Hodge star?

what is the mode of (14; 17; 18; 20; 20; 21; 23; 24; 25; 25; 25; 26; 26; 26 ; 27; 27; 28; 29; 32; 32; 33; 33; 34; 35; 37; 39; 45) is 25; 26 correct?
for such a simple question?
Yes
doesnt say anywhere in the guidelines no simple qs 
The cross product is dual to the wedge product, yes yes
why doesn't apple pencil have eraser on its end
is it possible to find the complex conjugate of a longitudinal wave?
25 & 26
lol. thank you 🙂
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
bad bot
Nah good bot
beep boop
just saying, confirming a correct answer should not be a bad thing
shouldnt be in the right channel
what does the bot use to pick up on this?
I was wondering if anyone knows how solve the problem using the shell method
Oh that's easy
Just remember that the volume of a cylindrical shell is equal to the integral of the shell's circumference times the height times the width
And the width is always d(whatever axis you're rotating on)
The height is the function
And the circumfrence is the tricky one to calculate but it's 2 times pi times the radius
But the radius is always the hardest to figure out
Whats the best free resource to learn math im confused
What math?
Highschool math i wanna build a solid foundation
khan academy would be a great place
and after that, u can learn a bunch of the harder stuff on youtube, MIT has good courses I reccomend them!
also various maths youtubers are good resources to learn from too !
3B1B 
Oh alr then ty
Whos him? Mit ?
MIT is a university
iirc their website had quite a few vids on math?
Oh
Ok then thanks ill go study khan academy math now!
gl
Yes, Spivak introduces cross product this way. I thought it was really neat when I first saw it
It also is a fun party trick when you're around other mathematicians
and you ask them what the cross product looks like in R2
damn
gawd forbid sum1 might give sum1 else an answer to any math homework!
#❓how-to-get-help
And be patient
hiii
wait
i need to take paper
why do i sometimes mess up the sum symbol
qkshchuehdj
It was easier than I expected
yes
i am telling you
lmao
it is hard looking but really dumb when u actualy do it
Why not tho
If it's a simple u-sub, then you can do it in your head
Who can’t integrate “x^2” in their head
Lmao yeah
One day

I was trying to derive a formula
For that I needed to integrate sec^2
And I spent like 20mins
Before remembering that
I literally got that sec^2 from differentiating tan
While I was wasting my braincells instead of recalling that
lmao
Lol
r u still dying
There will be ln in the answer, yes
ln 1
= 0
do you want me to just show u it 
yeah its basically
||do u sub sqrt x = t||
huh
lixy
i did
u no sub
[
\int\f{1}{1+\s x} \dd{x} \textqs{take} u = \s{x} +1 \quad \dd x = 2 \s x \dd{u} \
= 2\int \f{u-1}{u} \dd{u}
]
chet
lmao
u shuld get smth like t/1+t then rite

looks ugly and uninsightful



