#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 58 of 1
Idk if it has anything to do with nuclear fission.
honestly this may be as late as we can go and still change our ways
in terms of capitalism
like do we wanna find out bezos is going to the moon without us in 20 years, in 20 years, or now?
certainly nuclear fission is a very propriety process in the details and very valuable
some fallen 1st worlds like russia would probably love to be back up to speed
I'm just saying top secret shit all over
but yeah I say just put it on PLoS or arxiv
security is just another way for the lumenprole to be marginalize
i never hit you
Unfortunately no. I would have liked to work on a Bachelors thesis or similar but for some reason it is not an available option at all.
This is a surprisingly interesting class, I guess it's good to know about all these things but I'm mostly settled on moving in the math phys direction
I want to do an undergraduate thesis but idk how that's even done here
Oooof
I hope you can make it work through an individual or directed project under a prof's supervision
Even if not a formal undergrad thesis
I cannot even do that because this place has only been open for a few months in person for me
And I graduate mid-year
So not enough time for anything
I'm doing CS-ish research right now
but I want to do something pure math maybe
idk what an undergraduate thesis would even consist of
I'm guessing it usually amounts to a survey paper or similar most of the times?
Or presenting alternate/more polished exposition for some idea
not research?
I think original research is pretty rare for a bachelors thesis in math
Even for a masters thesis, from what I know
It kind of is a prelude to research I would say, but yeah, I don't think attacking unsolved problems is that common
this is most common
folklore result that was never published correctly
or what i like: recent result that presents some kind of algorithm that can be implemented
this can lead to original research when you discover that the published algorithm is wrong and nobody noticed bcs it wasnt implemented
Hey I don’t know if this is the right chat, but I’m in urgent need of private tutoring maybe rover a few days to a week, I can’t explain it all here because I don’t want to interrupt anything, but if your willing to priv tutor me friend me. Thank you.
@ripe wasp felt like we were going off topic so I'm moving the Convo here
You did do the category theory stuff from chapter 1, right?
Those are quite important
Especially Universal properties
Hi, have friended
i did that before, but need to skim over it again
And canonical decomposition
they don't quite do that rigorously i feel like
it was kinda iffy
something something terminal object
I was on 5
I skipped 4 coz it seemed dreadfully boring and wanted to do it with someone else
Way too long than it should've 
Maybe a couple of months? I'm not really sure
Universal property of quotient sets 
hmm chap 4 doesn't look too boring tbh
i never learnt sylow
but fundamental thm of finitely generated abelian groups is cool
symmetric group stuff is cool too
except for laborious cycle multiplication 
ah yeah i just read abt that
I learnt that from set theory 
Probably the first commutative diagram I drew, and in latex
i mean it's kinda like fundamental thm of algebra prime factorization things for abelian groups right
finite*
i have a q abt universal properties
is it like something that holds in any category?
so with the quotient set property you just instantly get the first isomorphism thm for groups and rings and whatever by just considering their respective categories
oh wait nvm
it says set
anyway @bright hill how much of aluffi are u planning on doing?
the whole book?
im thinking of up to chapter 7 perhaps skipping some things
It's something that can happen in multiple categories
You still need to verify the set function (which the universal property guarantees the existence of) is a morphism in your category
by set function do u mean $\bar{\varphi}$
sean
Maybe?
There are stuff which i defenitely wanna do
But others I'm not in such a hurry
I can always refer back to the book if i ever need em
My main objective rn is to Speedrun to chapter 7
post it in chat again chat
if u havent read thru alg geo by age 12 ure too late
Then maybe chapter 4 if i find someone to suffer through with 
ill read things if u tell me to read them
ill do it with u if u want
i also kinda need to speedrun it
because i have math camps coming up and if i get into one i might get to take an alg top class during the summer
But I'm not sure why I should care about Modules
So it's not very high priority rn, if you catch my drift
albeit it may be pretty crap bc it's prob gonna be hatcher chapter 1-2 or smth 💀
ah yeah, honestly, me too
i wanna learn the basic groups rings fields galois theory
then move onto smth else
Sure!
Lemme know when you reach that
But you don't need chapter 4 for AT nor AG
It's finite group stuff
i'm thinking to keep myself motivated i might start a yt channel or smth where i upload like a TIL each day of what i studied and aim for consistent daily uploads
better yet
stream in the secret vc
well you don't have access yet so time to start posting good content
LMAO
I feel like by far the biggest disadvantage for us, self learners, is that the learning process is completely unsocial
That's why I try as much as possible to learn stuff with people and make reading groups
And I've been mildly successful with that the last few weeks
Which did wonders for my motivation tbh
I wish I had people IRL to talk to about this
But i have found none sadly 
At least you have uni to try
Which reminds me
You know we should start a study group
Time to start lurking on local college campuses
@void tundra wanna tackle 3.24 in a bit? :3
whats 3.24.
Rudin exercise
Unironically, I think some of them have libraries open to the public and that sounds potentially fun
rudinmentary
how can a public library be fun?

Aside from the access to books I don't have at home, it's a good way to remove yourself from distractions to get some reading done
Well I go to class to get reading done
got 5 problems from chapter 4 as homework due tomorrow
You completed your degree?
u doing big rudin?
Oh, btw, what anal book are you doing rn
or am i thinking of the wrong one
i'm doing malliavin's "integration and probability"
Why not folland? 
i like the probability based view
i was thinking of folland, but im mainly learning MT for probability so i just said why not just learn from a book that has both
You seem to have similar interests to mine lel
So do I
But i also wanna do measure theory appropriately
And folland got functional analysis as well which might be fun
Anyhow
I should be done with rudin in a week or so
2 weeks max
After that I'm starting an analysis reading group around folland if you ever change your mind

How far are you into malliavin? 
@ripe wasp
ah i basically started last week
im on section 2.4 on chapter 1
Borel algebras. Measurability and continuity.
Operations on measurable functions
ah yeah, thanks for offering
i might change my mind, but im enjoying malliavin so far
other than the fact that it's kinda old and the notation is a bit annoying
@woven whale because you might care and its relevant to what we talked about
DFG is known for not telling you why grant proposals are rejected or what they even care about and today we talked about sending them an IFG letter
what's DFG?
deutsche forschungsgesellschaft
took 5 days to tell me that it's not their job
timely reply
if you message bezirksregierung, they will tell you to message whoever you messaged now :3
Lol
the theaterstück was total garbage btw
they didn't use any requisites
it was 3 people
I didn't understand what was going
woyzeck?
yes
ye so
the original is incomplete
unsure why its so important
there is an opera thats pretty good
I noticed
it just suddenly ends
after the guy kills his wife or whatever
i only remember the barber scene
get scammed
why can't i imagine anything like in graph of geometric related chapter
the album "ziltoid the omniscient"
not in a group
ok
if the + is addition in the usual sense and 0 the neutral element of addition then no, but of course we can define them however we want to. We could define + to concatenate two strings together, which would result in a + 0 = a0
by definition
have anyone heard about mirror multiplication and mirror division
@fresh cairn
hm?
U gave jee??
what
i am but i haven't taken it
i did yes
Nice
My classmate shockshwat tokd
Told*
There is another shashwat
Preparing for jee
Ok
what does f(x)/f'(x) give you in the newton raphson formula
the correction to subtract off from x
@sleek wing
for this
can't you also like argue that anything not in [G, G] commutes with everything else
Lol what why don't you just ask in the channel
^
think this works
but I prefer their solution using third iso
much clearer to m- wait nvm
nvm nvm, I do prefer it
what's third iso
like
I probably know it
but they're not labeled like that in german
lemme get the latex right one sec
hi guys
$N \trianglelefteq K \trianglelefteq G \Rightarrow (G/N)/(K/N) \cong G/K$
Wew Lads Tbh
i know this a maths server but i had a doubt in physics can anyone help?
why does third isomorphism thm have a name? I've never used it before, what do you use it for?
quotienting
it's used in the fundamental theorem of galois theory
Guys do we need electric potential to create potential difference?
#old-network physics server
I am so sorry
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
interesting function i was messing with in desmos: q^(1/p)^q^(1/p)^q^(1/p)... where q and p are both real numbers greater than 1
i don't know if it's a thing that exists and has special properties but for all the values i've seen it converges
why did you react with that
i know very little math pls tell me if this is a thing
iteration of ^(p/q)
also yeah i mean doing f(f(f(f(f(p) where f(x)=q^((1/p)^(x)) for like hundreds of f's is not very convenient
ok
there are dual numbers q, p such that 1/p + 1/q = 1 for p, q >= 1
appears in a ton of places in functional analysis
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
Sure
that's 6 to the power of 6/5 to the power of 6/5 to the power of 6/5 to the power of 6/5 which is slightly different
it's 1/p to the power of x, not x/p
this nicely converges to a value pretty close to 1 which is very different than ur function
doubt thats what you wrote.
oh nvm
q to the power of (1 over p) to the power of q to the power of 1 over p
ok
yeah if i wanted 1 over p to be times q i would include parentheses
and it'd be a lot easier to add
You can probably prove that it converges to the solution to the equation x = q^((1/p)^x) if you're careful
Or, one of the solutions. There might be multiple
this interestingly becomes greater and then smaller as you move p or q from 1 to 1 hundred
but the greatest or smallest values depend on what p and q are
That's hard to solve
,w solve x=q^(p^(-x))
Lol
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
uh
rephrasing it with z and x and y doesn't help
figuring out what this function is and interesting stuff about it could probably be very fun for someone who is much more advanced at math than i am but i guess i'll keep experimenting in desmos
i just think functions that converge when you apply them infinite times are really cool
ok but that's very different to q^1/p^q^1/p...
so yes no wonder it converges similarly to cos(x) = x or that other formula which is used to iteratively compute a root of any positive number
i mean not too different but
this is just investigating a function q^c^x for a stationary point tbh
it does have one for 0 <= c <= 1
Anyhow, @alpine kindle we should organize an AT reading group 

meow
you shouldn't joke about such things
Please don't :(
Whatuuup people
life is valuable, I was in your spot many times
and I’ve grown to be glad I failed those attempts
if ur being serious please get help
reach out
i can send u multiple phone numbers
reply back dude, im worried
<@&268886789983436800>
Shit went down
how does the bot detect if someone is asking help
Help me
hm
can someone help me with my homework
wait it doesnt?
There is already one going on by @tight sapphire for brendon if you wanna join
it's not active anymore unfortunately
the group is still there but almost nobody followed
I can't stop wondering how i should let the free monoid generated by sharp and flat act on the set of all music notes. Surely the two generators don't have to act as inverse to each other, right?
Yeah, that's the problem with large study groups. Maybe small scale groups would work better
why wouldn't they
I think it's a problem with not large enough groups personally lol
I mean they don't a priori have to.
It makes sense to do so if you restrict to an infinite discrete set of frequencies, then one would reasonably make them act as the predecessor and successor maps...
and they are inverses
nothing's preventing you from reinventing the definition of sharp and flat so that they aren't inverses 
I disagree
I think a study group can thrive with just 3 or 4 core members
Others can choose to commit
Or not
But people won't join a study group that's dead
didn't say otherwise
it's just that when you don't know many people that you're sure will be very active, well you don't have a choice but to ask as many people as you can
That's why I'm looking for these 3 friends 
Speaking of which
@alpine kindle is ignoring me 
speaking of which
we like missed last sunday

measure theory
or we could switch to topo tbh

I pinged you yesterday for a substitute
Here and in oby
hmm
If we could get the Munkres boys to switch to Lee that'd actually be sweet
True
But it'd just be us 2
And i already know most the content in chapter 2 and 3
I would ask ally but she did even more pointset than I did lel
@brittle socket 
What?
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
not here
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
Goddamn you beat me to it
Uh lemme see if I can rmb
Nvm lemme pull up my copy
p sure u dont need THAT much
But enough that im pretty sure I don't have the prereqs rn
Yea
The set theory prereq should be fine based on what I saw last time
I know basically nothing about metric spaces and group theory rn also
My brother in Christ, you can possibly have no reason to study set theory again in your life
i doubt you need that much group theory
Specs into foundations
jk

There are annexes or appendices or w/e they called tho
Yeah but I haven't done much AA other than the bit my set theory and lin alg book has touched on so far lmao. Which are like just the definitions of some algebraic structures


we won't need it that early
All that talk about "being a man", grass...
if you need it im sure DarQ can crash course lecture you
I am disappointed
Yeah, sure lel
Just a joke lmao
I picked up Schroder instead of Rudin for a reason 
that was a joke too
Yes, I know, Dark
DarQ*
Schroder of course 
uh
i am smart cus i joined this group
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
LMFAO

guys is it normal to forget multiplications tables?
lol
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
aH? did you mean Ha 
What's that really curly math font called again
ok pretty sure we wont need much analysis to begin with anw
uhh
mathcal?
or mathfrak
[\mathscr{AH} \qquad \mathscr{YES}]
grass
Hmm mathscr is not working
$\mathcal{AH}$
theyre equal if a in G, H subset G, with G abelian c:
NEONPerseus
we could also just have H be normal in G 
we dont talk about that

Hm
I think I want to complete some books before I start on Lee

Namely, Enderton, Schroder, FIS, first couple chapters of Jacobson's Basic Algebra I
what
just do it!
Sounds like a bad idea
I feel that getting my foundations (e.g. intro anal) down first would be better
@bright hill convince this person
we all support bad ideas

Real men get not very ppl
point set IS foundational lmfao
Well, yes
I personally did hatcher's notes instead of chapter 2 of rudin
I admittedly did a tiny bit of analysis beforehand
I literally haven't even completed one chapter of anal 
People who spent 10 days on proving n-th roots exist in R: 

You can just join and see how it goes :)
yeah its not rly a competition lmao
Hmm I would be slightly irked to start another book when I haven't even completed one.. but hmm.
Yeah why would this be a competition lol
(I don't plan to read my math books end to end of course)
This should almost never be a goal in itself
I have finished one
Learning enough of the material that you need/care about should suffice
It was not worth it
I'm going to Finish rudin, ok?
You're at chapter 7, right?
Yea
It might be a good time to stop after the exercises here, and move on to more interesting things
yea do spivak

Lecture notes>>>textbooks most of the times
Textbooks are generally packed with too much information, more than what one needs to care about when learning the subject for the first time
I see 
How do you find good quality lecture notes / materials to learn from? I guess as in, how do you assess if a random piece you found online, for instance, would be a good read?
Hmm, this is difficult to tell beforehand but you can look at how polished they are for instance
The content organisation/has exercises or not/even formatting
And of course
The author and the source from which you obtained it
Course notes from an instructor would generally be more credible than notes on someone's personal webpage
Ah I see, that makes sense
One of my active tabs rn: https://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/Charles.Walkden/hyperbolic-geometry/hyperbolic_geometry.pdf

filetype:pdf (topic name) lecture notes can often reveal goldmines
Sometimes even dropping the "lecture notes" helps, not always standard to include it in file titles or similar
I see, thanks for the advice Manan 

All that said, the standard thing about being disciplined and focused still holds
Diffusing attention across multiple sources all the time will generally make progress cumbersome
Sometimes you just need to sit down and work through something
I say this with 6 browser tabs open
So there's that

I see 
Why does 6 feel like the perfect number of tabs
Seemingly 6 is the maximum number of tabs I can have without the title bars shrinking to accomodate others
I don't want the pressure of having to keep up
sorry
meowsies
Understandable
Ask in this discord lol
That's what I've done
does anyone have good quality notes for calculus 1
I am trying to open a server like this one but in a different language
I want to replicate the help rooms (how they are available until someone sends a msg and some other things)
is there a bot that does that that I could use in my server? or is it more complicated than that?
so I will have to run it on my pc or a server right?
sorry Im really bad at these things
yes
the process is a bit complicated then maybe and sadly we cant provide support
oh its fine
thanks for the help 🙂
do you have any tips for running a maths server? something I should do or avoid doing?
we are struggling ourselves 
ban mathasking 
a lot of what we do is copied from the libera community: https://libera.chat/guidelines/
A next-generation IRC network for FOSS projects collaboration!
this is more general and not specific to mathematics
but general knowledge about community management applies
seems to be an unsolved problem though overall
hi
if you guys are working on a problem that you somewhat understand, like you know what your goal is, but you haven't done it before so you don't know exactly how to
how long do you keep trying before you just look up how to do it?
for example I have a rational expression in terms of x and the problem says to write it as a sum of an even and odd function
the expression itself isn't complicated, I know what even / odd functions are, I know how to add functions
but I still can't actually solve the damn thing
That heavily depends on the problem and how much I rely on knowing the solution in time to be honest
well I'm learning for the sake of learning, so I'm not on a time crunch
I'm on a time crunch in the sense of I want to gain understanding / mathematical maturity as efficiently as possible for the amount of time I invest
I feel like once I see a problem solved a few times, I can get a handle on it and do it
Not an actual hint but sort of a comment on the style of the solution: || whether you will figure it out or not, i can assure you you will be mad once you see the solution||
but this seems like the type of thing that I shouldn't need to see examples of before I can solve it, and I'm worried about my lack of problem solving skills
lmao
That's a mad one,yes
This feels like the type of discussion I dont feel qualified enough to talk about. Its sort of how much is it pattern recognition vs actually you coming up yourself with something original. Honestly I have no idea. Some problem seem so trivial after seeing how they work. But sometimes you just simply dont spot that one trick that solves the entire thing super easily
Right, that's basically my dilemma.
Well I think at this point it's better to just give away the answer
So ||a= (a+b)/2 + (a-b)/2||
nope, you guys telling me how mad I'm gonna be is kind of a hint
I mean eventually yes. But I feel like the discussion is more about. Once you run out of problems with solutions you should be able to somehow stand on your own feet and come up with approaches yourself. And how you encourage that effectively. I honestly dont know
I'm gonna try to come up with some funny ways to solve it
Well what have you tried so far
staring at the paper real hard
That one sometimes works
Well this is an even odd problem on generic functions
So you kinda should think about f(-x)
idk I've been considering different combinations of squaring and square rooting things
lol
Because otherwise There's no way to incorporate the f(-x) anywhere
And hence use odd/evenness
No
No
ok, wrong track completely then
Your domain may not allow square rooting
hmm let me take another run at it
It's always addition that works
I mean
We will be running the study group lel
We can go at whichever pace we choose
But sure ig 
We?
i don't want to have to keep up with anyone including you
i am already stressed enough
to @bright hill
sorry
aw i hope you'll get better :c
I'm dtf (down to form a calc/analysis study group)
no comment lmfaooo
thank you
🫂
this wasn't meant negatively towards you I'm sorry
its ok, i wouldnt wanna keep up with darq either
i can't phrase stuff properly
that's not what i mean
I wouldn't worry about my pace lmfao
i joke
i do not want deadlines of any sort
keeping up with u is like following the stock market i bet
zigzagzog
True lmfao
even if you're slow it's still a deadline
AT right
yes
@bright hill is it possible to do reading groups without reading
thank you
i think the reading part is fairly problematic
Yes
i am going to read it but i might like
stop halfway for sth else
or take a break for other stuff
darq is going to read me hatcher like a bedtime story
We can just agree to do specific buts together
An exercise or a section
i refuse to do anything of my own volition
I am doing this rn with derpz

Hmm
Why is it so hard to do math with people? 
No like
im very unlikely to understand something unless i go away, have a think about it for myself and come back
Like doing a course together or smth

That's what I'm looking for
i dont get what u mean
idk what u mean but im really down to brush up on or learn math
i feel i want and need to
for a few things
AT was one of them

you can join our reading group
ill join darq but not u
Don't join lumin's reading group...
THANK YOU
I find it hard to do things of my own volition so lets see if this helps me learn
we got cat bread ren and rakki
Me and derpz already do stuff in oby semi regularly
well ping me whenever u do AT and ill join
We currently aren't doing anything very organized
what helps me is talking about stuff
going thru examples
dont really get a chance to talk math
Sure, but we prolly won't be doing any topology for a while
thats ok
Would you be interested in pointset stuff?
sure
i never learnt it properly
i did AT in my final year, all they covered was chapter 1 of hatcher
chapter 1 of chapter
disappoint ngl
Ok sweet
the exam was silly easy
I wished we could do a full blown study group around lee's Introduction on manifolds
(which actually does homology and AT stuff)
But the Munkres fan bois wouldn't agree to it 
So ig I can just convince DerpZ to read through it together
I already know most the stuff from chapter 2 and 3
And a bit of 4
But the other chapters look dope af
Also, I'm doing folland very soon
Like
In 4-5 days I'll be done with rudin prolly
You might be more interested in measure theory
i need to do both
i know much less measure theory
At least till folland chapter 3
Folland 4 is pointset so by the time I'd be done with chapter 3 i should've covered the pointset i needed with DerpZ
Then I'll see if I wanna commit to functional analysis, algebra or probability or multivar anal
That's my plan for the near future, anyhow
Topology reading group confirmed? @void tundra

darq you can join us
it's not
stupid analyst
You still haven't answered why not Lee
500 pages of pointset
It's perfectly reasonable bro, it's not boring at all bro
You think 200 isn't a lot?
Hatcher's notes are like 40
And he specifically made them for his book
:/
oh i was using rotman anyway
so we wouldn't have been able to do the reading group
even if i could
I wasn't settled on any book for the record
It's lumin that wants to do hatcher for AT
ig if you say R is dedekind cuts of the initial in Field
then you haven't defined what integers are yet
idk what dedekind cuts are. witchcraft
wikipedia tells me its constructed from rationals
Bruh
How did you guys construct R?
iirc there are indeed axioms characterizing the reals that don't refer to the integers
thats something we leave to the analysts
ok ok, my defn of R is just the completion of Q
thats the only one i had to care about
surely dedekind cuts require you to construct the integers
I suppose i can't judge
then you have to be careful about how you define "cauchy sequence" because metrics are supposed to be R-valued, but sure
it works if you're careful
Since i haven't seen a contruction of the reals yet
meow meow ryc
Guys hey
I wanna study math becaues I think I love it
in particular, both the cauchy completion and the dedekind cut construction are important and generalizable
so where should i have learnt about these dedekind cuts
you need Q
not necessarily Z
Guys
nowhere in particular, they're in chapter 1 of rudin somewhere
well, where are you starting from?
I finished high school
I wanna knwo something
euclid has an interesting dedekind-cut style argument
I have a question
if you want to go through calculus stuff, you could try Khan Academy or MIT OpenCourseWare. those are both free
What am I gonna use universitie's math for?
Am I gonna use it for programming
Or Ai and mL
wheres the best place for me to quickly learn dedekind cut? wikipedia verbose
it depends, most STEM fields use a certain amount of university math (calculus and linear algebra)
Because I want it to be purpsoful and useful in order for me to find it motivated
in AI and ML they use a lot of multivariable calculus, linear algebra, probability, and statistics
hmm hmm, so tldr
we partition Q into an open interval (-infty, a) and [a, infty) <-- these being intervals in Q
this is a cut?
why don't i just tell you. a dedekind cut is a pair of subsets of Q, (A, B). they partition Q, so that A cap B = 0 and A cup B = Q
and A has the property that if x in A, then y in A for all y < x in Q
Are you saying ai and ml are not programming?
that's not a good definition because not every cut is defined by such an a in Q
im saying the opposite. I think i misunderstood the grammar of the sentence
some of them are defined by such a's in R
oh.
which is what we're trying to define
for example, the dedekind cut that represents pi is given by ({x in Q : x < pi}, {x in Q : x > pi})
ok so this is very similar to completion idea
it's completions for ordered sets
and R is then the set of all these cuts, I take it
yes
and you can define addition and multiplication and such on them
seems like most things past high school could be used for AI in some roundabout way
Is choice involved here or not at all
to get R as a complete metric ordered field
not really, all of the objects are totally described
hmm
well in the end u have to kindof manually come up with the subset for pi say
by {x in Q : x < a1 or x < a1.a2 or x < a1.a2a3 or...}
which is how you show that this is the same as decimal expansions
yeah thats kindof what i mean
no not choice
but constructivists can still use infinite sets right?
idk why that has a different vibe to me
since the set of cauchy sequences in Q is way bigger than R (well, the cardinality is the same but tons of them converge to the same element of R)
computers just use arbitrary precision or something
and we just kind of like
squish it all together
and then what's the right cauchy sequence to think of when you think of an element of R?
in reality the best definition was always just decimal expansions and the others are just to make us feel better
im just doing a countable union of intervals instead of a countable sequence converging
in some sense a countable sequence converging is a countable intersection of intervals
I see, countable union, thats fine then
very nice this easily defines extended reals
this actually makes me think of another way to define R
which is like completions
it's sort of a compactification of Q, locally
isnt there weird versions in synthetic differential geometry also? where its sometimes like heres a space its smooth now we make sheaves of it
you could look at elements of R as being nested sequences of closed intervals in Q whose diameters go to 0
that's the same as the cauchy sequence definition but somehow it can be made more topological i think
anyway
sheaves :wg:
add 
in this case they'd basically just be open sets, i think
how do the diameters go to 0? like as a limit?
if so you could probably use nets to make it more topological?
Yeah
i dont know
there's some problem here cause like
idk
i want to look at nested sets of neighborhoods
Oh this is just what i was looking for
In general topology and analysis, a Cauchy space is a generalization of metric spaces and uniform spaces for which the notion of Cauchy convergence still makes sense. Cauchy spaces were introduced by H. H. Keller in 1968, as an axiomatic tool derived from the idea of a Cauchy filter, in order to study completeness in topological spaces. The cat...
goes down an interesting rabbit hole
Anyone DM me if you want to help me improve with Maths everyday, it would mean a lots to me as I'm failing it.
I can assure you that no one will be dming you
I'm not sure where to post this
But I'm trying to graph the polynomials in the proof for the stone weierstrass theorem (rudin 7.26)
But i can't get it to work
It says "you can't use x as an integration parameter coz x is already defined"
Can someone knowledgeable with desmos (or any other graphing alternative) help me out?
have you tried just using a different letter
x is probably reserved
Yea
doesn't work
desmos can't deal with these things
this proof is another one of Rudin's crimes
like his construction of lebesgue measure
it relies on ideas students have not encountered
don't bother. prove it yourself
Like i can follow the argument
find a better proof to follow / prove yourself
Hot take do measure theory starting from single variable calculus
I would rather just accept it and move to smth else to be honest haha
Half of the mess in analysis feels like "Oh we don't have measure theory yet :("
I might do that hmmm
What's that?
the convergence to end all convergence
Enderton 
You and Wikipedia make it sound grand
But i still haven't done measure theory 
Soon doe!
fr? that sucks 😭
Useless. 
anyway the main idea of Rudin's proof is just convolution / mollification
an idea you will learn when you get to Fourier analysis
or any kind of real analysis really, because mollification lets you approximate any rough function with smooth functions. which is very neat. smooth functions are nice. That's how a lot of PDEs are solved
just that without knowing about mollification, the proof just seems like magic
It does hahaha
I remember there was a cute proof from probability theory for weierstrass
law of large numbers I think
I think I fixed it by just replacing all your integration variables
in just f(n) changed x to v
pretty sure desmos can do nearly anything, although some things are pretty hacky or will lag it out
there are extra features you can enable as well called actions: https://help.desmos.com/hc/en-us/articles/4407725009165
Learn more about: Enabling Actions | Getting Started with ActionsClickable Objects | The Ticker | Actions Using Variables and Function Notation
Introduction
Actions provide a way to react t...
btw there are a ton of proofs of weierstrass's thm
one way our class did it was by approximating |x| with polynomials and then using that to build piecewise linear functions and then using that to approximate uniformly continuous functions
the reasoning was pretty simple
the real point is approximating |x|, which both Rudin and Folland noted
there's also one involving binomial polynomials
that's the law of large numbers
bernstein polynomial one is probably not too bad to make some kind of demonstration of in desmos I'd imagine
yeah prob not
👀
Today I watched grand budapest hotel, brokeback mountain, and coraline. What movies should I watch next?
if you enjoyed grand budapest hotel then i recommend other movies by the same director, eg fantastic mr fox and isle of dogs
I’ve seen them both and I enjoyed them a lot
I need to rewatch isle of dogs though it’s on my list
yeah i only saw it once, back when it was released in theaters
knowing the director theres bounds to be bits of detail to pick up on a rewatch
coraline is great, ever seen nightmare before christmas?
I have but it’s been a while
Same thing with corpse bride. I liked them both but I would have to rewatch them to tell you what they were about
hmm the director also made frankenweenie
i havent seen it myself but it seems to have a good dose of macabre humor like corpse bride and nightmare before christmas
ever seen any studio ghibli movies?
I actually have not but I definitely need to get on that
awesome, yeah almost all of their movies are worth a watch
my favorites are spirited away, my neighbor totoro, how's moving castle, and grave of the fireflies (this one definitely isnt meant as light entertainment)
I am up to watching nearly anything
and while we're in anime... hmm
I think all of those are on my list to watch
I’ve heard that it’s good
its so good that i have one of its characters in my profile banner
ok change of pace, this isnt based on anything you mentioned
oldboy (original from 2003, not the remake)
the handmaiden
these are south korean movies if youre interested in that







dini