#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 17 of 1
I can't think of a counterexample nor a way to prove the converse
No
what's stopping K=F
Take Q and Q^+ viewed as a field
And the automorphism phi(x)=-x
and also if K<F, then the automorphism of Q(root 2, root 3) sending root 2 to -root 2 obviously does not fix Q(root 2)<Q(root 2, root 3)
For any field $F$, and subfield $K$, is the image of $K$ under an automorphism of $F$ always $K$
Mizalign
oh wait its not pointwise fixing
ay thats a cute pfp
yeah, switch x and y in F(x,y)
But I’ve never heard of an analogue of characteristic subgroups for fields
then F(x) not fixed, right? (F a field)
how are you applying sigma to x?
What do you mean
it’s just the field of all sigma-x
how are you applying sigma to x
Functionally?
oh K is a subfield
yeah, good point. Thanks
yeah its not always true
apparently if for some field $F$ and some subfield $K$, if the stabilizer of $K$ is normal in $Aut(F)$, and the extension is algebraic, then the extension is normal
Mizalign
as per what I was told yesterday
i just don’t see how algebraic-ness has anything to do with automorphisms
i’m trying to use resources (artin and d&f) to find what I’m looking for but all of them are considering intermediate fields of a galois extension which is uber-specific
namely
- Every intermediate ring is a field
- No intermediate field is fixed by the same fixing automorphisms of the base field, and the extension is finite
This is not true
Take K = Q and F = Q(cbrt(2))
Aut(F) is trivial, and hence so is its subgroup Aut(F/K) (which you like to call the “stabilizer of K”)
So it’s a normal subgroup
The extension is algebraic
However not normal
ah, thanks
I think that youre not writing down what yoh wantto though
I think what you are trying to write down is
If you have an (algebraic) tower of fields F / K / L and if Aut(F/K) is normal in Aut(F/L) then K/L is normal
As opposed to saying that F/K is normal
that was a part of it
What do you mean “a part”?
Why does algebraicity matter here
Idk you were the one who had that as an assumption
Also Aut(F/K) being normal (and algebraic) in Aut(F) does not garuntee it’s galois, correct
Also fwiw my second statement also isnt true. Take L = Q, K = Q(3^(1/4)) and F = Q(3^(1/8)). Aut(F/L) = Aut(F) = Z/2Z and all subgroups are normal
In particular Aut(F/K) is normal
But K/L is not a normal extension
My second statement is closer to correct though — if you assume the large extension is galois then it is
Actually maybe normality suffices
I.e. if F/L is normal then this is true
hm
this was what I was gonna ask later
“Normal” doesnt even make sense if youre doing transcendental extensions
So if you want to talk about things being normal you should limit yourself tk algebraic extensions
I’ll be back in 20
Ok i might be gone then
You might be interested in thinking about this, though. You can directly link the non-normality of the lower extension to the non-normality of the subgroup Aut(L/K) in Aut(L/F). Try to show that if sigma(K) is a subset of K for all sigma in Aut(L/F) then Aut(L/K) is a normal subgroup of Aut(L/F). Therefore if it’s not a normal subgroup then there must be some sigma in Aut(L/F) which doesnt take K to itself
Now let sigma be as above and let x be an element in K for which sigma(x) is not in K
Sigma(x) is a conjugate of x and they are roots of the same min poly (over F) but x is in K and sigma(x) isnt, so the min poly of x over F has one root in K but doesnt split, so K isnt normal
In order to prove the other direction, that normal subgroup implies normal extension, you need to assume that L/F is normal
And i gave an example earlier to show why that’s a necessary assumption
i just want to understand how automorphisms and algebraicity combine into the notion of galois extensions and their beautiful properties
A Galois extension F/K is an algebraic extension such that
Fix(Orb(K)) = K
Where Fix(X) maps subgroups of Aut(F) to sets that it fixes, and Stab(G) maps subsets to subgroups that fix it (lattice morphisms)
but not much I can think of comes from this, and why is algebraicity so important
ESPECIALLY when finiteness becomes involved.
i wish there was a way to phrase finite extensions with automorphisms instead of going on a side tangent to “determine” it via vector spaces

algebraicity just says every intermediate ring is a FIELD which ofc has it’s own implications
For some transcendential extension A/B, with transcendential element x, then we can map A[X] to B which fixes A but maps X to x, but because the kernel is trivial (epimorphic) this new ring image is isomorphic to a subring of B that contains A, which the implications of which I haven’t worked out more of
oh wait yeah
that’s fairly intuitive, it’s just the ring generated by powers of the transcendential element
yeah
the algebraic extensions are natural here since they have connection to quotients of polynomial rings and you can talk about minimal polynomials of algebraic elements and so on
yeah
transcendental extensions don't really have an interesting relation to these same things
like it's the same as adjoining variables
which is important, it just behaves very differently
why is this important in conjunction with the “stabilizer-fixation” def of galois extensions
gtg
gmod
are you using the sub notation to mean "in base n"
1010_10 meaning 1010 in base 10 ?
i am in confusion
do you have your bases reversed?
yes
hi guys I’m perperaing for grade 9 math entire test with all units and stuff does anyone have like a link with example tests or etc to help me prepare?
picked up a new book today 
lets say we have two complete lattices A and B with a heterogenous relation between their elements R. Can we technically define functions between them that essentially map any element to the minimal element that is related to it in the opposite lattice
it technically maps joins to meets and vice versa
and inverts order
Why 3e? Was it cheap?
yeah, it was second hand so i got it for really cheap
cheap for a math textbook at least
good enough, since 4e is out. not too sure on the edition differences
i mean i'm not necessarily poor, but i'm just a high school student
like i can usually ask my parents and they'd usually say yes, but i feel guilty whenever i buy a textbook that's expensive
I get it now
but I am 
Have you considered the wonders of the internet
Without naming names, there are websites that host books
Had to check the rules just in case
Look at this crazy wikipedia page! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_Genesis
Library Genesis (Libgen) is a file-sharing based shadow library website for scholarly journal articles, academic and general-interest books, images, comics, audiobooks, and magazines. The site enables free access to content that is otherwise paywalled or not digitized elsewhere. Libgen describes itself as a "links aggregator", providing a search...
Definitely haven't engaged in any of this "piracy" nonsense, no sir
The more you spread awareness the more chances it wont exist later on
It has an entire wikipedia page are u being funny
You are dumb as hell if you think wikipedia page equates to popular knowledge
🙄
Just keep it at DMs
Publishers are v much aware of libgen, but libgen has legal ways to get around it
It won't be going anywhere soon.
And certainly any academic knows about libgen lmao
This is most possibly the most privileged argument I ever heard
I wont change your mind and I dont plan to
all I ask is to keep things at DMs
Christ jass, can you please be a bit more polite at least
no because its an actual problem
It's really quite simple. Libgen is going to be fine.
I'd love to contribute to libgen, but I haven't got any books! 🤓
Its copywright infringement and books have been removed for this
High school students reading Grimmett and Stirzaker........
Also the site has gone down in the past
Great stuff. While we're at it, should we get the TeXromancers to stop posting their project that reproduces copyrighted material on this server?
Wait it is just "copyrighted" isn't it
You can also write original non-copyrighted mathematical books
The whole point is you arent supposed to share it
No matter how much I completely disagree with jass are, please stop jokingly working around the discord tos policy about piracy stuff
Ooer
Thanks
There is a growing body of creative commons licensed books
disagree?
Forgor about the discord policy
Checked the server rules but not discord's rules 💀
lost manga scanning websites hheaven and other similar websites
Although there probably isn't anything that is libre-licensed on the level of Grimmett yet
cut off one head, and two more shall take its place
Yo if anyones interested in using about 3 minutes guessing fictional characters names who have NOT read percy jackson/heroes olympus pls tell me in dms. sorry if i dont reply right away/are offline when dmed
this already happens with libgen
they site gets shut down and they host in more areas
worst case scenario we will need to spoof location by using virtual network to access it

afaik the site should still be fine though but access will be harder
guys i already knew about the library lol
i just like having physical books better
that’s why i feel a bit guilty
because i already technically have a pdf of everything
and i don’t exactly need the physical book
just talked to my new roommate about math a bit
hes a physicist
im not convinced we agree on a single definition
what was his answer for what a tensor is
Physoids be like: infinity minus infinity = 0
Definition of a vector
I asked what a manifold is, he said locally flat and is a topological space
I asked what a topological space is, he said has a manifold in it
Their books go hard though
like wtf is a world line
they're not too worried about the specifics
Really annoying though when relativists use technical facts from Riemannian geometry without elaborating at all
they're applied mathematicians, they dont need to care about the details, I get it
The edges of the light cone I believe
I dont worry for a second when I use results from #foundations
because that shit scares me
Me IRL
Physicists arent applied mathematicians
Next ask them what "locally" means
ill add that to the list for banter topics
Interesting take. I think it's hot but correct
close enough to true for what i am attempting to conclude
im not really an applied foundationalist either
within a monad of course
im gonna ask what a field is next
imo the litmus test for applied mathematics is "are you on the math faculty"
well that seems incredibly unfair
Basically haha
plenty of applied mathematicians arent affiliated with a university at all
the horror
where's that xkcd of <blank> is just applied <blank>
anyone here into computational geometry
Lmfaoo that footnote
the footnotes are always incredible
Petition to rename applied math "impure math"
what even is "pure"
the fewer the numbers, the more pure the math
for some reason that brings to mind this recollection from TA'ing first semester calculus once upon a time:
professor: [explains some simple concept]
student: can you show a numerical example?
professor: this is a numerical example, x is a number
student: #$*(&#@$
LOL
gradschool has led me to he discovery that i know nothing
what do you study
This fills me with excitement for the many holes I get to fill
topology/geometry
what specifically
nothing really yet, just a second year. i have more knowledge in partiuclar areas obviously but it isnt really worth mentioning, i may or may not end up doing stuff in those areas
what favorite topic as of 2022
Hyperbolic geometry
then you definitely know something
Assume I am about to study in the library, and that I will be reading a specific book. In case both the library and I own a copy of it, should I bring my own copy instead of using the one from the library?
I mean, you can jot notes down on your own copy so you might prefer that. But if it's heavy and you have to lug it there then maybe considering not bringing it.
it there a nonzero chance that someone else will check out or be otherwise using the library copy?
It’s certainly possible that someone else would be needing it, and not every book has more than one copy available there.
I don’t write much on the books so that is less of a worry for me.
Well I guess I’ll just bring mine with me then. They are not of the size of dictionaries anyway.
@neat lintel dude join
Plz if u can
I’m so high right now it’s actualtm insane
The vc @neat lintel
I need math help
Jk dude I’m just really extremely high and it’s actually crazy
what is abstract alegbra about?
A general treatment of similar structures occurring ubiquitously in mathematics
what do you mean by tteatment like a covid vacine?
If i wasn’t high I wouldn’t have pinged u too
Cuz I already know that sh look stupid
But idc bc
This is is unbelievably insane rn
Well I guess you could also ignore the first four words from my previous reply.
not really?
algebra deals with how these structures behave/how they become what they are
and more
how they become .. thats a cool way of phrasing it!!
so i asked im what is abstract algebra and he said ::
A general treatment of similar structures occurring ubiquitously in mathematics
we can rephrase that:
a general discusiion or exploration os structure that are vecoming or , have becom e
yeah
you start off by studying about groups, rings and fields
u see what makes them what they are, seeing how they behave when compared with other things of the same kind
its very cool
it's like high school algebra but far far far more general
and then there's universal algbera 
Can anyone suggest to me how can I improve myself in trigonometry? Or like in Pure mathematics ....
practice
I'm trying my best. I do all the h.w.from book and question paper but I feel like I'm not improving... Most of the time doing maths I stuck, there is always a problem and I need help! Which I don't like so much. Later I realise that was easy🙂💔 then why I couldn't do that math by myself!!
make sure you really understand why you're doing what you're doing when you're solving
like "why this step and not that"
and make sure you understand and have an intuition behind trig
I will try to keep your advice🤎. But can you explain to me what you mean by having an intuition behind trigonometry?
like do you know why sin^2 (x) + cos^2 (x) = 1?
To be honest noooo! I asked the teacher, he said you don't need to know this how this comes from now just memorize it, you will know it later in your A'levels.
Lol im just saying knowing how the unit circle works helps a lot while doing trig problems
Um, okay!?!
Bruh the explanation isn’t even that hard
The unit circles radius is always 1, therefore any right triangle you construct from that radius has a hypotenuse of 1
If cosine is one side and sine is the other
You do pythagorean theorem where c^2=1
And there you go
Yeah pretty much. If a teacher is unwilling to explain, you might wanna consider looking up more resources online appropriate for your level. Khan Academy is frequently recommended for the middle/high school level, so maybe give it a go. Having an understanding of why some identity is true helps a lot in remembering it and knowing when to use it.
Imagine your teacher is unwilling to mark or actually do something useful for English

Saying this from experience
Dang..... there's a lot of occupied math help
noiree?
what does that mean?
It's a name
Semester began
You should see at the end of the semester
Lol
Sorry, I’m new here but I have a math problem and I’m not sure where to post it lol. Basically I’m wondering what f(x) is if it’s conditions are f(x) + f(1/x) = 4 * pi, and it goes through points (0, 0), (1/5.002, pi), (1, 2 * pi), (5.002, 3 * pi), and it approaches 4 * pi as x -> infinity. It has to be continuous, and the range is [0, 4 * pi] between [0, infinity]
Where would I even post a question like that? Lol
If it's a homework type question read #❓how-to-get-help
Ah, ok, thanks
if there are 100 ppl and 40% of them have eaten chocolate , and 30 % of them have eaten mint, (they can eat both ) (the 30% can overlap with the choco eaters)
what's the probability that one person picked has eaten both
is ther a way to know who has helper role

A = eats chocolate
B = eats mint
A intersection B = eats both
independent contingencies =>
P(A intersection B) = P(A)P(B) = 40% * 30%
orrrrrr just use latex and you dont have to pay for an annual subscription for shitty font
user handwriting argueably better
it looks cuter
yeah
Either Latex or Handwriting. I’m at the two extremes about this.
What about microsoft word

I use my phone keyboard
There are people occasionally typing TeX code as plain text.
Haha funny joke
Presumably as @zealous garden intended in his reply
Yeah you could also carve it into a rock, but I mean an actual alternative. You wouldn’t submit a plain text file for a math paper
Or you can do what people used to do for typesetting before Tex was invented. Reading old publication really is a pain in the the for me
monospace everything
Oh no I do that but I meant lim ₓ→ₐ f(x) = L ⇔ f(μ(a)) ⊂ μ(L)
∀x∈∅(∃y(y*x=0/0))
And such
i still wondered why i call it a closed loop integral

Because it's an integral over a closed loop

Do you guys know any good volunteer opportunities or websites that can help me find volunteer opportunities? I am looking for something related to business/finance. If you know some other opportunities/organizations you can let me know and I will check if they a operate locally. Thanks.
classes start today 😬😬
what will you have today?
thanks for asking. today i had a cobb salad, chobani greek yogurt, and a naked blue machine
for lunch i will have a wrap
you had that for breakast?!
yea
a cobb salad
GOOD LUCK
Ty!!!
ok i got an uncrustable for my carbs
Remember, only stop showing up to class after the first week so that the professor knows who you are /s
TRUE!
i’ve introduced myself already to all my professors
i’m basically done with sandwich
what’s the crossword
with the school year *
lmao im thinking about my sandwich rn
nyt tuesday
ok i finished it
we can organize some here, downforacross is a great collaborative crossword site
sounds fun
nyt = new york times
ik
im so bogged down with hw and classes that i dont do much other than study
and its only the third day of classes 
yes
Cobb salad is gross
Agreed
You have hw on the first week? Damn
I have physics and genetics hw 🤢
@ancient flame r u starting uni
yeee
microecon online, intro to business in-person, marketing online, and stats in-person
in that order
R u a business major?
yep
Inch resting
yeah 
lol
Why did u choose business
im very interested in it and I think it is a good opportunity for financial success
I love things like marketing & HR
Well.good luck
tyyyy
Having online and in person classes interspersed like that seems like a bit of a pain
gmod like "i love HR"
cant u take a math minor gmod
a bit but eh
LMAO
I will probably do an information systems minor
find excuses to not attend the online lectures
lol
ikr
he probably wants to live vicariously through you
Motion to ban non-integral domains

wut
lol
Good or bad stats
havent gone yet
Motion to ban non noetherian ring
that's at 3 pm
I mean Cale based or not
i remember reading this post that noetherian is unnatural and actually one should work with some other notion of ring that is more general and more natural
Lol based
Makes sense
when will gmod lose active role
When you stop posting
when will @rough beacon stop posting
lmfao @mortal igloo
found in a list of GRE practice problems
clearly the problem author never took your calc class
no the problem doesn't look hard
it's just funny that it's technically incoherent
anyways I should get back to studying
👀
$g(x) = \sin(\sin(x))$ so $g'(x) = \cos(x)\cos(\sin(x))$ so $g'(0) = 1$
ally 🌈
wow I solved it in a completely different way
fundamental theorem of calculus + chain rule
$$f(x) = \int_0^x \cos(t) \ dt \quad f'(x) = \cos(x)$$
$$g'(x) = \frac{d}{dx} f(\sin(x)) = \cos(x)\cos(\sin(x))$$
Poppy Lascelles
found the technique in my GRE prep book
not using leibniz integral rule
the what now
rip dummy var
oh it's just the general form of that
oh yeah my brain immediately went to leibniz integral rule cause i saw x in the bound and in the integrand
i didn't even realize it was a dummy variable fuckup 😭
so useful
oh yeah that seems kinda pog
shouldn't be that hard to prove
Noetherianity is a disease from which the human race will soon recover.
Lmao
the proof in the wikipage of the leibniz rule is pretty understandable
i thought you had to use the leibniz rule for dummy variables until yesterday 
What did I do wrong here? For #2
I feel like this integral has 2 answers
either -2arcsin(x) + c
or 2arccos(x) + c
bc u can leave the 1 or -1 inside the integral and take out either -2 or 2
My teacher said that I was wrong here though so I’m confused as to why I got the question wrong
Your teacher is wrong, -2arcsin x + C is valid
,w derivative of -2arcsin(x)
they were probably just grading by an answer key and going through it fast so they made an error, -2arcsin x + C and 2arccos x + C are both valid here
smh bad teacher
you only make epik fails
LOL
i love these kinds of problems hahaha
like, where two very "different" looking functions are really the same
,w plot -arcsin(x)
,w plot arccos(x)
i do this activity in my calc classes at the start of the class after we do u-substitution. i ask them to integrate 2sin(x)cos(x). i tell half the room to use u = sin(x) and the other half to use u = cos(x)
one half gets sin^2(x) + C and the other half gets -cos^2(x) + C and then I prompt them to "argue about it until you figure out which side was actually correct"
someone usually figures out the trick after a minute or so and then we talk about it
Oh that's cute
oh here's another weird calc trick eric, idk if youve seen this before but it always freaks calc students out. it uses integration by parts. here's how it goes:
Buncho do you mind looking into #groups-rings-fields really quick
It’s 2am and I’m not sure if I’m lying to yamin rn 
let's find $\int \frac{1}{x} dx$ using integration by parts. Choose $u = \frac{1}{x}$ and $dv = dx$. Then $du = -\frac{1}{x^2}$ and we can take $v = x$. Then, using $\int u dv = uv - \int v du$ we find that our original integral is equal to
$\frac{1}{x} \cdot x - \int x \cdot -\frac{1}{x^2},dx$
simplify everything and we get that our original integral $\int \frac{1}{x} dx$ is equal to
$1 + \int \frac{1}{x} dx$
now subtract $\int \frac{1}{x} dx$ from both sides and conclude that $0 = 1$.
Buncho Bananas
I like to do that example after I do the integration by parts example that's like, integral of e^x sin(x)
where you do it twice and then add the original integral over
and so this is a similar "trick" where you subtract the original integral from both sides
except it cancels out
Love it
yeah my friend helped me to make sure I didn't get food poisoning
and it ended up pretty tasty
but now I think I got the food sleepies 
pics
That's the first proof of something like 1=0 I've seen that didn't involve dividing by 0
Very nice
is the mistake here that u took dx as the second function?
I cant figure out what went wrong here 
Integration constant
how do you pronounce $(\frac{7}{10})^5$ in English?
Sorry I'm from a non-English country.
is it seven-tenths to the fifth power?
runoob
Yes that's fine
Latex tip (if you didn't know alr)
You can use \left( \right) to size the brackets properly so that they loook nice
Like
[ \left( \frac{7}{10} \right)^e ]
grass
I say it as
"7 upon 10 whole to the power 5"
I say "7 over 10 to the power of 5"
but what you wrote is equally fine
so you prefer to say 7 upon/over 10 rather than seven tenths?
I'll say "a half" instead of "1/2" but I'll say "207 over 95" instead of "207 95ths"
depends on the size of the numbers I think
Objectively, sincerely, honestly, wholeheartedly, completely, absolutely not
in a rare turn of events I completely agree with slurp
no human in the history of history has said it like that
Oops I ate it so fast that I forgot to take a picture. But I think I will make more tonight so I'll see if I can remember
7 by 10 whole raised to the power of 5
u are very wrong
I am incredibly correct
not at all
as per usual, I am
considering thats how i say it a lot of times
you are an idiot
and a lot of people do
no you are an idiot
does it make more sense in hindi or something
because that's one of the most clunky, verbose ways I've ever heard someone phrase "7 over 10 all to the power of 5"
good morning slurp!
not really?
damn hittin my mans slurp up with the reversal
its just a lot of people say it like that
i never found it fun but it became a habit so a bit hard to get rid of it

can't let him be first every time
Good morning Darq!
good morning shushy!
Is it mathematically correct to say that “nothing” is a part of everything?
the empty set is a subset of every set
soooo
ig?
Good morning DarQ!
That's more like “you can always choose to take nothing”
Maybe split it into like three stickers
how to calculate length of a cord covering a 1/3 of a circle, any resources for the whole cords lengths vs angles shit in a circle i learned in school?
trig
Hi where can I ask about lambda calculus?
That's probably what I would say, or #proofs-and-logic
Hey guys, which topic discussion does a question like this belong in?
Math
currently obsessed with map projections. are there any digital tools to visually make your own projections? like adjust equations to define mappings from a sphere to a plane?
Anyone have the ti nspire cas 2
ok heres ur reminder, dont disappoint 🙂
^^
Haha what if I forgot to put the chicken in the fridge to defrost? That would be such a silly thing to do ahaha
man
u can quickly defrost by putting it in cold water
Oh bet

Dinnies!
nice, looks good
Lots more for the weekend
jesus
yoooooooooo looks delish
why do people like college parties?
It’s honestly more boring, no good food, everyone sharing the same drink
Going to the bar is more fun, they have good food
Also the chicken looks amazing
bars are expensive and loud and full of obnoxious people
big college parties suck
but small parties with close friends are great
the food is an issue
Definitely I agree with u
Quick question bars == clubs right?
not necessarily
there are plenty of normal bars
most of them blast music and make it impossible to talk
and it's way way cheaper to buy a couple kinds of alcohol for a party than it is to get 2 or 3 drinks at a bar
like 10 or so bucks
haven't been to a proper club, i think i'd probably like that a lot more
since i like dancing a lot
lol
yeah i like a lot of very "refined" music but i also definitely don't mind club music
nice talking to u ryc see u around
good night!
m
Good Afternoon Chalk
good afternoon grass, have you touched grass?
Yes I have touched myself

Hi discussion 2
Guess why I lost 2 marks in a practice paper I was doing
Lol fair enough
Do anyone attend the Oxford MAT livestream?
yo, does anybody know for linkedin.
does the "courses" section on your profile represent what courses you teach or which ones you actually took
i think took because what u teach only applies to "teachers" lol
how would you prove an existence of something without giving an example
Axiom of Choice 
Axiom of choice
Seems like you had the same idea as me 
Tensor product is always done this way
hm? the tensor product is constructed
Universal property + other construction method proves existence of the tensor product
you prove it exists by constructing it, yes
in some contexts, you can prove existence by showing that the set of such objects has positive measure
can i post something on here
choice
How do people self-learn from math textbooks?
- Do you take notes when reading them?
- Do you try to derive proofs yourself before learning the topic (or seeing the way they proved something)?
- Do you solve all the problems at the end of a chapter? How much should problems one solve to be satisfied of the understanding of a chapter if they are short on time?
yes, yes and no
in general for any school or first/second year in university topic you'll easily find tons of practice problems, so you'd want to solve most of them
but more advanced books don't always even have exercises and when they do there isn't a whole lot of them plus they can be quite difficult
i usually do a few exercises for each subchapter
some people like Moth do most of them
How do you pronounce P(A|B)?
P A line B? or P A with regard to B? or conditional probability of A with regard to B?
Thank you!
"P of A given B"
like you should 😌
i get so much anxiety if i dont complete most of the excercises
literally have trouble sleeping
"Do I feel like doing these? Nah, moving on to next section"
especially when you're just itching to move on to that section you've been looking forward to
I only do them if I'm having trouble understanding the concept
And then if there's some reason where I really need to have that concept down then I do them
is this for a differential equation of the form y' + p(x) y = q(x)
yes
It would be great if we could write y' + p(x)y = q(x) in the form (M(x)y)' = Q(x) because then the equation would be separable and thus easily solvable (assuming the integral on the RHS is doable), this is what integrating factors help us to do
i wrote smth on it if ur interested #multivariable-calculus message
You are correct
runoob

The professor teaching project management (It's called “software engineering” but it's actually PM) in the upcoming semester is notorious for just reading the texts in a very flat tone and answering questions by “I would say yes/no”
Looks like we've got ourselves some sleep aid here
For me,
- Depends on the book. Good books that has a clear line of logic shouldn't need notes, only page # of specific concepts. Books that jump from concepts to concepts leaving you confused af is a sign that you need a better book 💀
- Some proofs that you can immediately visualize the logic doesn't hurt to try; proofs that are very basic can be skipped due to triviality; proofs that are core concepts of the subject you are learning are usually too hard for you to derive/prove in a time-efficient manner (that's why the author wrote the book, to present you with this "new" concept) and should be read and studied carefully instead of trying to prove it from a vacuum.
- Try to understand what each problems are trying to teach you. If you see 20 pages of calculus exercises may be a good hint it's written for engineers and usually prepped for failing them in courses 💀; overall try to solve the problems that pose new concepts and things you are not familiar with
biggest lesson: never self-teach Rudin's Principle of mathematical analysis as a first course to real analysis 💀
What's wrong w/ Rudin lmao
The measure theory part is bad
But that's it
as a first course to real analysis
I took it as a first course
it took me way more time than worth it to understand the first few chapters
maybe you have a solid foundation and all the prerequisites for it
i couldn't understand what a topology is, what compactness means
Its usually recommended to have a background in proofs b4 starting baby Rudin
I'm still working on compactness myself
even then I still wouldn't recommend it because the concepts are too big of a leap
the book is known for being terse
is a good reference book
Idk about that - it's an undergrad text so it doesn't have many of the results you'd like it to have
besides, you are self-teaching it, meaning any questions you had would go unanswered most of the time
ya my point is still just to use a better text on analysis
Pugh is a good suggestion, there is also Abott or Tao
maybe I'm dumb but I really had a hard time reading Rudin, I'd agree on Tao being good
You're not dumb! There's nothing wrong w/ not understanding a math text first try
it took me 2 years to finish 2nd chapter in rudin, that's why I never would recommend that book to any self-teachers
you need at least a strong set-theory foundation
and i studied more logic for it
Dami: Where's my Schroder
Hi Phenom
Schroder is good, but so is Kolmogorov Fomin
Those are books of a different level than rudin
I self-taught out of Bartle and found it pretty doable. Bartle writes quite well. Though it doesn't touch topology until last chapter I think.
Ayo!
Lmao grass
Is it still possible to do original research on the gamma function?
Or has everything been discovered yet?
We can’t tell if everything’s been discovered
It seems like a pretty shallow topic to try to do original research in, especially considering the fact that there is likely 100+ years of research on that function which you don't know about
And especially if you don't have someone giving you a problem to work on that you know is approachable for you and means something
Probably better to find another area of research
Is it possible to algebraically solve a^x = x in terms of a?
Or do we need a value for a?
Or is it a case for Newton Raphson/cobweb diagrams?
I tried to look into the history of research surrounding the Gamma function and found this quote by Phillip Davis: "each generation has found something of interest to say about the gamma function. Perhaps the next generation will also."
Forget special values of zeta, let's talk about special values of products of Gamma functions
oh god yeah I played around with these recently
let F/K be an algebraic field extension,
If Aut(F/K) is finite (nontrivial), then is the extension a finite extension?
this does not extend to transcendential extensions, correct.
Or is any extension with a finite auto group necessarily finite
It's actually |Aut(F/K)|<= [F:K] so I'm not sure if that means the extension is finite
Seems to be false
i intend to comprehend the fund theorem of galois theory without comparing orders because that method seems insufficient to me
the best alternative I’ve seen is via primitive element and using the group quotients
what I want to understand is what specifically about finite galois extensions creates the bijection
For example:
Let A/B/C be a sequence of infinite algebraic extensions.
if A/C is galois, (defined via automorphiams), then is A/B?

What does this mean
without using inequalities on the degree of the extension or order of the galois group/subgroups
So you want a reformulation of "given a finite Galois extension E/F there is an order preserving bijection from intermediate extensions K to subgroups of Gal(E/F) sending degree n subextensions to index n subgroups"
that does not mention the order/index of the subgroup or the degree of the corresponding field...?
i want to prove it without using such
so you want to prove the existence of the order preserving bijection without making reference to the specific degree of the extension?
getting a proof of that is not particularly hard
explaining how the infinite case works is harder and involves talking a lot about topological groups
The topological group explanation seems like it piggybacks off of intermediate finite extensions
What
I read a little into it but it didn’t make a whole lot of sense
you probably frankly dont have the prerequisites to understand it
I dont think you know much about topology
no, not really besides what a topology is
But the point at which finiteness is utilized isnt hard to see in the proof of the finite case i dont think
and the basic ideas of hausdorf-ness and compactness
all of the proofs I’ve seen use inequalities on orders and degrees
the point of the bijection is basically to say that if you have some finite galois extension E/F with galois group G
Quick question before I get in a help channel, is boolean algebra considered maths?
id say yes but ya know, dont want to sound dumb lol
what's a hausdorff space
every two elements of the set the topology is over have a pair of disjoint neighborhoods
suppose we have H with fixed field L and let K = Gal(E/L). we wish to show that H = K, yes?
yes, and the other way around
The point here is that you can easily directly see that H is contained in K and that the degree of H is [E : L]
yes I know that
and K is the group of automorphisms of E/L
but what is it
and by definition there are at most [E : L] automorphisms of E/L
hence |K| <= [E : L] = |H|
and since G is finite and H and K are two subgroups of the same order with one containing the other, they are equal
my interpretation of it was that it improves your ability to compare elements by the open sets that contain them. Hausdorff Spaces essentially allow you to “isolate” points from eachother
i forget specifically what I wrote down for the justification and did a little drawing
i used an analogy of a city
if your extension was infinite and G was infinite then these sorts of cardinality comparisons wouldnt imply anything
but I’m trying to avoid that

You literally cant
this theorem is literally not true for infinite extensions
you are going to have to make reference to the key properties of finiteness
is there a way to prove it without referencing the degree of the extension besides knowing it’s finite
or what properties are equivalent to a finite extension
what does that even mean?
i’m trying to think of a better way to explain it
I’m really trying to avoid touching on polynomials
it sounds like what your asking is "is there some theorem about finite extensions which we can reference here without explicitly comparing the cardinalities of various subgroups" but the proof of said theorem is going to rely on that so
No
which the proofs of the inequalities between subgroup order and field extension degree are determined by in all the sources I’ve seen
like the literal key content of what is going on here is that in the finite case two things of the same degree related by containment are in fact the same
whereas in the infinite case they are instead related by closure
i dont really understand where this preoccupation is coming from but if you find this unsatisfying i suggest you step back and work through this stuff again until it feels more intuitive
this book series is amazing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Books_of_the_Western_World
Great Books of the Western World is a series of books originally published in the United States in 1952, by Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., to present the great books in a 54-volume set.
The original editors had three criteria for including a book in the series drawn from Western Civilization: the book must have been relevant to contemporary matt...
I went to my local library and they had half of the books in stock
checked out like 5!!
got descartes, fourier, hegel, and a couple more i forgot
how do you determine the midpoint of collision between 3 particles
Hi guys random but I'm trying to make a joke, when $a^2 + b^2 < c^2$ that means that the triangle is acute right?
Not Trout
a squared plus b squared equals c squared plus two a b cosine theta
so 2ab cosine theta is positive
hm?
wait isn't a^2 + b^2 = c^2
OHHH
for a right triangle
okay i get it
this accounts for any other triangle
and a^2 + b^2 is less than c^2 when cos theta is positive
because for 0 < theta < 90 its positive
then for 90 < theta < 180 its negative
AYO

Lol didn't notice that that got so many reactions
@potent plume Get in here, post your question so we can all look at it some more
Ok i understand
Alright I'm gonna drop this instead
Can anyone solve this
With no other information
Just 2 equations on a section of masking tape
This was posted in a help channel by another person, we have no idea what to do and it's funny, so I'm putting it here
Wrong
That’s not masking tape
Unless it is
It looks more like the margins of a piece of paper
That really looks like green masking tape / painting tape
Again, the problem we had before is that the don't have enough information from the question by itself, and just An=n²+4 or An=n-4 are not questions by themselves; not only that, they don't mean anything specific like that.
Though the blue line at the bottom looks like the rule in a piece of paper
Could be masking tape tho
Hmm maybe
Okay
You know im dumb I don't know
Im telling that my answer is correct or not
I beginning rn in this server don't you ever think this is funny
What kind of tradition
Hazing
yeah no
first off this is in incredibly bad taste
airing out someone's shit to make fun of them
but also you know that posting questions outside of help channels is against the rules
the fact that you think its "funny" doesnt change shit
Is the an= n² +4 = n-4 is correct
especially since the apparent "humour" comes from mocking them
That's fair
sigh
tfw u have a question about a question you are not sure what the question is and it develops into a series of questions and eventually you question your sanity
me rn
lol
arent they okay with this behavior
i dont see the issue
they both having fun with it
@stone ferry im pretty sure the person was talking about a series a_n
where they defined what a_n is
This is annoying to read.
do we even use the term "imaginary numbers" anymore?
Better question: can you call 1+2i an imaginary number or is it just a complex number
Just multiples of i
Migillope
$z$ is imaginary $\iff z + z* = 0$
wraithlord_koto
Where z* is the complex conjugate
Re(z) = (z +Conj[z])/2
No, I think I probably agree with Borcherds. I'm annoyed at the whining saying the question should be shut down
Give it a rest. just let people ask questions
What do you call a discussion site where nobody can discuss anything
thats what i mean
i agree with the third person
Stack exchange when you dont write up a 300 page pdf detailing the context of the questions, it’s implications, the history of math related to it, and an autobiography
Hahahah
They just shut down questions for no reason I don’t understand
what is the name of the operation where u invert the digits of in binary
Bitwise complement/bitwise negation.
Hi
OMG SWEAR
Entry for the #3Blue1Brown Summer of Math Exposition 2022 (#SoME2)
by
Rodrigo Coin Curvo
&
Alexander Maier
Read more about Integrated Information Theory and the #neuroscience of #consciousness: http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Integrated_information_theory
Also, check out Rodrigo's entry to SoME1, which goes more into detail regarding the ...
sorry for the poor resolution on the equations
@hollow sundial Did you know that greatest integer function is abbreviated GIF, so then is it pronounced as gif or jif?
haaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaaaa
it's pronounced fleur
because i'm @themateo713#5303
What
Anything that requires my presence ?
no! meant to wrap it in backticks
Your presence is always needed
Hi can someone help me in #prealg-and-algebra
yall should read me new blog: https://aareyanmanzoor.github.io/2022/08/26/Stone-Čech-Compactification-and-Multiplier-Algebras.html
Stone-Čech Compactification and Multiplier Algebras. There is an isomorphism theorem of Gelfand, detailed in the next paragraph. It ends up giving an (anti)-equivalence of categories between (C^\ast)-algebras and the category of locally compact haussdorf spaces. It gives rise to the philosophy that (C^\ast) algebras are really the study of ...
whats unfortunate about az
many, many things
John's saying he's unfortunately alive on earth right now
oof dw ill get backon to it when AWS roles around
amazon web services? 
Arizona Web Services
Speedy web compiler?









