#book-recommendations
1 messages · Page 120 of 1
Lee (Topological manifolds) vs Munkres
Btw just saw topological proof of infinitely many primes 
Oooh I've heard of it
what's the topology's name
austernberg topology or something
on the integers
Furstenberg
dang what am i doing with my life
I mean
if you're not winning a fields medal in two different fields by the age of 15...
have you ever really succeeded?
too late...
wait can i prove topologically the irrationality of sqrt(2)
🤔
Time to give up on mathematics and become a filthy engineer and cry with my stacks and stacks of cash about how I couldn't become a mathematician
I saw a "number theoretic" proof of it in dummit and foote section 0.2
I assume it was the contradiction where we let it be some hypothetical a/b?
Wait till you realize engineering maths are just as hard as pure maths 
bro EEE people solve crazy differential equations
it is unclear how you would define it topologically
it does not have any special topological properties
so probably no
How hard is Lee's topological manifolds exercises?
they are pretty straightforward imo
well
Lee has exercises and problems
exercises come right after a theorem and are usually pretty easy
the problems are at the end of the chapter and are usually a little more challenging
e.g.
Munkres is great, never read Lee
Fun fact, it’s homeomorphic to Q!
Q factorial? how is that defined?
Topology & Groupoids is clearly the best…
<@&268886789983436800>
gamma function retriction to Q?
Guys any book for functional analysis?
what's ur purpose of learning?
there are million fa books and everyone of them are for diff ppl
Basically for quantum mech, i saw some need for it while studying QM, i think an introductory to intermediate course would be enough
@verbal ibex books for universal algebra?
Omg ivr been mentioned
Hmm
I personally learned UA using Burris and Sankappanavar, and imo it uses the cleanest notation from what I could tell
Also, the explanations were all very clear and the book is structured really well
However, more in-depth and also using more category-theoretical concepts is the book by Grätzer, although I dislike his notation a lot lol
Those are the main books to start out with
After that I heavily recommend Commutator Theory by Freese and McKenzie
I hope you don’t mind me asking what is Universal Algebra 😂, i’ve never heard that field
Notably, this uses basically only lattice theory
Its algebra in its most general sense
Ooo I like the sound of that
Where in group theory you study groups, universal algebra is about whole classes of algebraic structures (mainly those defined by certain formulas), properties of those classes and how these properties relate and interact and stuff
i got this when it was $16
just seemed cool
and i heard it was useful for model theory
damn inflation goes crazy
no it was one of those random unannounced sales
Gotcha, that makes a little more sense
sometimes certain UTX paperbacks go on sale for $16
Both way around
I use model theory too, as universal algebraist
Yeah someone mentioned a springer discount code in here and i took full advantage with 2 new books
no code needed
just happens every now and then
also some gtm paperbacks as well
Yeah, in universal algebra free algebras (the ones given by the free functor left adjoint) are the connection between algebra and logic so theyre really important
i assume you also know some books on lattice and order theory?
Nope, sadly
Im sure theyre not too hard to find though
@remote sparrow we had some books lying around for lattices, I'll try to look for em tonight
in fact i already found some through google, but i wanted to know if there were any other references beyond what i found
Ahh oki
Which do you guys recommend for classical alg geo between fulton and shafarevich? Or another?
umm can you send me the link again plz
maybe this? it seems to segway better into operator algebra territory more than books that are more aimed for pde people such as brezis
Analytical Mechanics is the investigation of motion with the rigorous tools of mathematics, with remarkable applications to many branches of physics (Astronomy, Statistical and Quantum Mechanics, etc.). Rooted in the works of Lagrange, Euler, and Poincare, it is a classical subject with fascinati...
@naive lava have you heard of this book
wht about calculus by richard courant
kreyszig's book should be okay for you than
or maybe reed and simon if u want qft stuff
but for a general qm course you won't need to know FA, it doesn't even really come up
yall i have an amazing sieries its not math related but it is amazing its called"the unwanteds" by lisa mcmann 10/10 series
no, lemme check
uh
why would you want this over goldstein?
longer, except stat mech goldstein covers everything here
and is more standardizied
it's not a perfect book but a good book
i was curious as to its quality
i heard it was more on the mathematical side?
then why not arnold?
seems it uses basic diff geo of curves and surfaces right off the bat
was just curious
ah i see
ye you'd need to be good with abstract linear algebra more than anything
Sour Drop is basically like Thanos collecting infinity stones
he wants infinity books
Gimmee
I wonder if sour drop doesn't get tired recommending books 
abstract linear algebra? u mean "let's call this ket and bra without giving definitions"
adjoint? what's that?
dual space, reflexive? naah they are the same lol idk what ur on about
yeah i remember reading ts it’s good
Marry me
No. To compare Sour Drop to Thanos would be akin to comparing the Sun to a photon.
One has practically infinite greed, while the other only has 5-greed.
And infinity time to read them
I could not find them sadly 😭
Crying
In other words, you are more interested in logic than in naive analysis. Reasonable.
Hi guys I really love maths but I am bad it at the same time how to improve myself need guidance ( I aspire to be an engineer will join college in next few months)
Hi
more like a basic request ig but i need books that can help with math olympiads and stuff
like word problems stuff
Good PDE book for self study?
Does anyone have good graph theory books for self study? (Aimed towards math competitions)
Does anyone have a book recommendation for number theory?
Modern Olympiad Number Theory by Aditya Khurmi
Cool, thanks
Number theory for beginners by Andre Weil
There seems to be a free PDF available
depends on your level. If you have real analysis experience I’d check out Evans
Hey, I am looking for good introductory texts in geometric analysis. Any recs?
whats your background?
,books
no
bro is throwing in Royden slander in the middle of reviewing Cohn 
I think the one by W. Strauss is nice if you enjoy applications and haven't studied the subject before
does someone have interemdiate coutninga nd probability by aops online pdf? 😭
Hans Rademacher's Lectures on Elementary Number Theory is pretty old, but it's short and covers the basics.
I will check
Thank you

Calc 1 textbook
Thomas' Calculus
Thomas' best
Whats a good abstract algebra book that develops the theory straight from the ZFC-Axioms (no prerequisites) and has good exercises?
For reference I really like how the exercises from Analysis by Terrence Tao are and Ive enjoyed reading a bit of Set Theory by Jech. I also like abstraction and rigour.
Why from ZFC. ZFC puts set theory on solid foundations. Abstract algebra only needs to assume those foundations
So abstract algebra from elementary set theory foundations (basically the approach u see anywhere) is good enough
I dont know if my understanding of the foundations is good enough. Im currently learning Analysis by Tao and read the beginning of Set Theory by Jech (up till the aleph numbers)
What would you recommend as a prerequisite for abstract algebra then?
just some intro to proofs book does it
any recs for modern algebra
Also what's the prerequisite for modern algebra
Will the used number systems be constructed in abstract algebra books?

(assuming the naturals/ordinals)
u dont use no number systems except 1, 2, 3
what
the first things u learn about are groups rings fields in no particular order
ordinals arent rlly relevant
oh so things like the definition of the rationals and the construction of the reals via dedekind cuts arent that important?
if so ignore the things ive typed
the book only needs to have good exercises and be rigorous
the reals are largely irrelevant for abstract algebra
the rationals are relevant for generalizations like the field of fractions
u dont actually use it to do stuff with the reals
u just assume the usual properties
ofc learning the construction is educational, etc etc
Math generally, you can black box the building blocks no problem. And go back to figuring out how the blocks work later
Then I think that I know the prerequisites already or can figure them out while reading. What book would you recommend?
Thats the thing too. When u come into a roadblock because u blackboxed something u can go back then and there.
Axiom of Choice is necessary for some parts of algebra. You can blackbox it if u want for the proofs, or go back and look a bit deeper
as someone who is learning math for fun that coming back is what ive been doing constantly
good to know it will keep working
Im searching for something with few but really good exercises (Abstract Algebra). I will be self studying
I dont have access
archiver role
Ill look into it
thank you
Imo almost all intro algebra texts have good exercises. If you want something with (partial) solutions you could go for either Gallian, Aluffi's Notes from the Underground or Bhattacharya. Fraleigh is also good for self studying
You can start without any prerequisite, most beginner books dont assume anything
Nice beginner books are Aluffi's "Algebra Notes From Underground", Fraleigh "A first course in abstract algebra" , Artin "Algebra" (its a bit harder but also you can read it without any prereq)
Which one of them goes into more detail?
Aluffi is very beginner friendly
also has some solutions in the back, aimed at self learners
Is it still rigorous?
100%
Looks like the perfect book to me
Thank yall for the recommendations
very beginner friendly and shows all steps for theorem proofs instead of saying "its obvious to see" etc
which one is most advanced here?
damn it cant get any better
i think a few older texts do this, but i don't remember. if you're curious to the full constructions of various number systems, you can look here: https://www.amazon.com/Number-Systems-Foundations-Analysis-Mathematics/dp/0486457923
This study of basic number systems explores natural numbers, integers, rational numbers, real numbers, and complex numbers. Written by a noted expert on logic and set theory, it assumes no background in abstract mathematical thought. Undergraduates and beginning graduate students will find this t...
nzm
Yeah, Aluffi is a good choice. It has a more categorical viewpoint than the others, and starts with rings instead of groups
starts with rings and integers as well
Yeah
Goes into module after rings, which most first courses do not
Also again, no linear algebra assumed too
Isn't this only in his grad book
Or am I stupid
No
From rings to modules to groups to fields, this undergraduate introduction to abstract algebra follows an unconventional path. The text emphasizes a modern perspective on the subject, with gentle mentions of the unifying categorical principles underlying the various constructions and the role of ...
his grad book starts with groups
Ah okay
Wait so which book do I need to read?
The one Sour Drop has linked ^
okay
his grad book is called "Algebra: Chapter 0" its more advanced, not for beginners
btw, when you're self studying it may be hard to know what material to skip and what is important. You probably don't need to read Aluffi cover to cover, you can consider skipping some of the more advanced ring theory stuff in the middle, and skip straight to groups or modules when you're ready
when youre self studying, its actually better to finish a book
than worrying about skipping
the group theory is pretty fun, so when you're sick of ring theory it's nice to mix it up
that way, you get proper foundations laid down before going to more advanced topics
yeah fair
yeah, in an ideal world you should finish every book, but in practice you're gonna spend so much time on stuff that is not super important
so group and ring theory dont depend on each other? (in the context of the book)
they do depend on each other
like Noetherian and Artinian rings, finitely generated vs finitely presented, etc. are not that important to understand on a first read-through
however, whether to introduce one or the other first is a pedagogical choice
you can always learn about it later
I see
i dont think these stuff are in aluffi notes from underground
oh wait it is
generally, authors like to treat rings as specific examples of groups
@gray gazelle what is your background? like what math do you know rn
since rings satisfy all the group axioms as well as some others
yeah, Aluffi even introduces exact sequences at some point
I mean, it's nice to get some exposure to it, but I don't think you need to understand it fully on your first read
Chapter 8 in Analysis 1 by Terrence Tao and the first pages of Set Theory by Jech (till the aleph numbers)
I really liked the rigour in the book by Jech I didint read it further cuz Im not that interested in set theory
Average pure math experience, just copy paste definition
You can also try giving Artin a shot, although theres no solutions in the back
HAHAHAHA
Am I missing something, what's so funny? 🤔
so, i haven't finished alluffi yet
but i am interested in algebraic geometry
i don't wanna hang myself so i won't be reading hartshorne
any other recs with similar coverage to hartshorne
(i don't know french also don't wanna read 1800 pages)
https://agag-gathmann.math.rptu.de/en/alggeom.php and The Rising Sea are the usual recomendations for this
yeah i was thinking of vakil
is is good?
and what exactly are the prerequisites?
gortz and wedhorn
@dapper root
It makes me laugh because when I downloaded the book I thought it was easy but it is not.
a lot of algebra
so im assuming aluffi wouldn't be enough?
i heard vakil was supposed to be self contained wrt the commutative algebra
hmm
but it couldn't hurt to read eisenbud or matsumura first
comparison between grotz and vakil?
I'm talking about this lie
or altman and kleiman
800 pages 💀
u just need a subset
which subset?
think he says in the preface
if u don't wanna think about it just do altman and kleiman
basically modern atiyah macdonald with all solutions
free online
every textbook is free online
also, do you know how grotz and vakil compares?
there are some i couldn't find
well you collect unprinted books lol
not rly, it's just mentioned here
pretty sure chmonkey recommended it
Yeah, the title is a cruel joke
I dare not imagine what Chapter 1 is like
Proof based calc book ?
Vakil or Gortz & Wedhorn
probably keep both on your shelf and refer to both
spivak, apostol, and kitchen
Thank you 
Kitchen? 
Leaping off current math-discussion, does anyone know of any books on euclidean geometry, conics, quadrics, etc.. that are NOT Euclid (tho idk how much of what I just said is actually covered in euclid)?
euclid's elements is pretty good
I struggled a LOT with reading it the last I did due to the way stuff is wording and stuff
oh i was just trolling since u asked for not euclid
oh buh
would you be mad at me if i said i didnt know any other geometry texts
but seriously, idk of any books that cover stuff like conics and quadrics heavily outside of like...idk AG books
no lol
That's why we have a public book recs channel :) you share what you know
eventually ill know AG
seems really high level tho so im not stressing about it
Anyone heard of leithold calculus ?
lang, hartshorne, kiselev, and pamfilos are ones i've heard of
Was able to write off much of my book purchasing as taxes
So if you didn't include it in your tax forms, just know that you can
how'd you do it
it's my first time
i knew if i became a mathematician id be joining the tax fraud community
Mandatory: am not a CPA, but there was a spot in turbo tax to upload materials spent on courses
It just asked for an amount
How gentle do these begin? We were never all too good at this material and don't want to explode on contact
they are all suitable for high schoolers. probably more concise than the ones assigned in today's schools though
try kiselev first
Will do, thank you
curious are you filing like some business thing or are you writing that like under your personal taxes? Because I would assume maybe standard deductions would be what most people take compared to itemizing
I'm a PhD student, I'm filing it under the appropriate subject for college students
I know I could ask this in one of the sticky threads, but hopefully this leads to some discussion.
I'm considering purchasing and studying Diestel's Graph Theory; I finished up undergrad last year and want to do more, but I have never formally taken a graph theory course nor a combinatorics one, though I did do a research capstone that was he...
Hello, I am preparing for a term paper about the Riemann Hypothesis. Would appreciate it if anyone could drop some literature🙂
Wait wut
Bruh I should have done this
Jesus Christ is NOT white. Jesus Christ CANNOT be white, it is a matter of biblical evidence. Jesus said don't image worship. Beyond this, images of white Jesus are not just blasphemous and criminal, white Jesus is from Satan ( the imposter.) Why? Let's look at what Satan does:
- He is incredibly narcissistic and promotes himself shameless...
My advisor has great respect for people who do research in number theory.
what is this video description

~~Surely the best calculus book ever written is this: https://www.academia.edu/41616655/An_Introduction_to_the_Single_Variable_New_Calculus~~
if anyone starts math from 0, what advice would you give him?
I need a source that is understandable and that I can take plenty of notes from
Someone perhaps has lecture notes about Coding Theory?
To have a friend that knows at least as much math as they know so they could use him if necessary
Cool 
Damn i wanna do thesis in algebra but we had no professor for pure maths 💔
Now I am working on numerical analysis
Yeeah but I want to use my head as much as possible
I like to feel my mind while thinking
cant go anywhere without seeing this 😭 💔
What the fucj
is this typed in google docs
Typical, you criticize the medium because you can't find fault with the message
well its not without merit if read as a study of schizophrenia
it was just the first thing i noticed
Someone perhaps has lecture notes about Coding Theory?
Mofo is nerfed 5 times
what do u even mean by this.
How did you get 5 times 😟
I have this saved from when my math and TCS club from undergrad did a series of presentations on coding theory
- Essential Coding Theory by Venkatesan Guruswami, Atri Rudra and Madhu Sudan
- Courses taught by Venkatesan Guruswami, including some on Coding Theory
- Sphere Packings, Lattices and Groups by J. H. Conway , N. J. A. Sloane
- Cool YT Channel with a playlist on Algebraic Coding Theory
- ECE 556 SP 2020, a course on Coding Theory
far from exhaustive ofc
hey c'mon
you can make that rigorous in string theory
as rigourous as renormalization can get
Renormalization has a mathematically rigorous treatment 😭
Also - anyone have thoughts on Jarvis ANT?
I'll add a book relating it to algebraic geometry (hot topic in coding theory, database redundancy, and other topics these days): Van Lint, J., & Van der Geer, G. (2012). Introduction to coding theory and algebraic geometry (Vol. 12). Birkhäuser.
Where do you come from?
At my university there are no professors specialized in pure mathematics.
Ohh. I am from Pakistan
(Particularly in the state where i live, education is really low)
mathematical analysis: a concise introduction by bernd schroder is very good
Hi guys is there a math book that teaches you the basics of engineering pls
can someone recommend a book to learn the calculus needed for physics? ill be reading electrodynamics by griffith which has multivariable calc and partial differential equations and stuff
Stewart's calculus should suffice
or thomas
there's alot
and they're msotly the same
or if you want something challenging do apostol
or you could try out Thompson's calculus which is pretty unique
There's also spivak's calculus which AFAIK is decently challenging
I've also wondered what's anal the first time in math lol, and then aha it was short for analysis
@fair fiber yo is sweden good
how are the university costs there
well thats 10x cheaper than america or uk xd
8000 / year?
Well that's still cheap compared to USA
are there scholarship/financial aid programs for international students? my main target is germany since its really cheap
I will learn
I see
Same, thought I was the only one, who likes it, when it gets warm and void
Just do lots of problems, that's what I hear all the time, Do hard problems, easy ones, and etc doesn't matter
when I do problems I see lots of holes in my knowledge
What about munich or Heidelberg?
Ye thats where I wanna go
Yeah probably i am thinking to go outside for master and higher education. (My undergraduate has been fucked up by my university so i don't wanna waste masters and phd)
I am thinking for Germany (Bonn university) and maybe Italy (we get a scholarship for Italy i will apply for it)
Idk if there is any scholarship for Germany (particular Bonn university)
Sorry for this question, are u from Germany?
(If u don't wanna answer you can skip it)
Oh ok.
Well i am already in my final year 😵💫
I should keep Searching for scholarships
Idk where should I focus, IELTS or Germany lol
anyone read "surely you are joking my feynman"?
Oh yeah
||Btw i am scared of large spiders 💔||
I will try to come out from Pakistan, thank you mq 
Austria is not Australia, I doubt there’s large spiders in Austria
Oh my bad.
True, but I dont wanna waste my time.
I have already wasted 3.5 years now i am trying to improve my few main subjects like
(Real & complex analysis, abstract and linear algebra, topology and differential geometry)
(i think we should move to #advanced-lounge or #math-discussion
not so sure about math education but it has a very nice math phy program
guys
what is a good number theory book that encompasses both "elementary concepts" and "advanced concepts"?
I'm looking for a overall good number theory book
Advanced concepts as in abstract algebra?
Typically number theory books are in two sets - pre-abstract algebra and post-abstract algebra
you can check https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-98931-6
yoo this is cool
any more books like this?
Hey, silly question. Is Michael Artin's Algebra also a good linear algebra textbook or should I look elsewhere?
I'm looking more to review what I remember learning, if that helps narrow down what I'm looking for
If youre just looking to review what you know id recommend Hoffman Kunze, its a little more concise (since its just LA) and just generally a great book
Artin is good too though, just generally
Thank you!
At first I was trying to learn linear and abstract algebra in one go, but apparently the university I'm applying to has an entrance exam on LA and Real Analysis
The Real Analysis textbook I was recommended was Tom Apostol, but I'm also open to recommendations there
Although in that case, I need to learn from scratch so I'd need an introductory textbook
i like the aops algebra books
but make sure to look at the book in sections
or you'll get bored
apostol is nice
or so i head
but abbott is great
if ur looking for something concise than rudin might also work
Ireland and Rosen?
A little more on the advanced than elementary side
But it does plenty of ENt and the first 6 chapters require almost no algebraic formalism
Abbott is a standard recommendation for a friendly intro. I've used it, and I've been thinking it's the best book to use as an intro compared to the others I've sampled
Thank you!
abbott, jay cummings, lebl are good
why would they do that? your uni pays a handsome sum to subscribe to the digital library and make books available
small-scale downloading, even in the hundreds, won't hurt them
i've been assigned a springer book a couple of times
How do yall study? is it recommended to do all the exercises in the math book or be conservative and only do a selected few?
Despite popular belief (looks at you @vital bane @heady ember ) no, you should select the exercises you do.
I do select the exercises I do: all the nontrivial ones 
I think im just gonna do the example problems that the book gives you while reading the lesson
I think breadth beats depth
and post algebraic geometry 
bad idea 
certainly not
that...doesn't even make sense
elliptic curves 💀
yall do textbook exercises? 😭
I mean obviously you don't have to do every single exercise in a math textbook, but doing as many as you can given a (actual or artificial) time constraint is a good idea
me outing myself for slacking 💀
70% of the learning happens while doing problems 
gotta work twice as hard
math + piano 
yuh
at one of the top US music schools
the uni it’s a part of has uh
the math department of all time
oh the music school has like a uni integrated into it? it's not just for music?
it’s part of a large university ye
inchresting
also the textbook exercises they do assign
are always the trivial early ones at the start of each set
😭
and somehow the average on the last midterm was still 55%
(for intro algebra)
(using herstein’s textbook)
despite the fact that my prof was a student of artin 💀
I think doing the bare minimum to learn a topic is best since theres so much to learn nowadays
and your expected to learn it quickly
and over time I think doing only problems for topics that are your main point of interest instead of prerequisites seems to build upon the knowledge that you learned from the prerequisites and consolidates your understanding for what you want and what you needed to learn
more in depth
Idk i just think in a black and white way
you either do all the problems or you do the bare minimum
to pass
since its very arbitrary to do the problems in a limited way since you have no way of knowing which problem will make you learn the most since you dont know if your just self studying
maybe if your doing a uni course and you have a professor pick out problems from his expertise that will give you the most bang for your buck it wud be worth
idk i just think since there are no specific set of problems that would give you total understanding you might as well do the minimum set of problems to give you conceptual understanding
which would be the exmpl probs in my case and the books im reading
you might have a book without exmpl probs so idk what u wud do then
just take an hour timeslot of doing problems i guess
this is a very bad mindset in general. "i dont know if I would get the best possible outcome even if I put in effort, so I might as well not try 🤷♂️" you should try to break out of it.
You can possibly gain a lot of knowledge from putting in effort, but you know you wont gain much from not trying at all
I just think if my goal is a specific topic I don't wanna get bogged down by prerequisites when I could strengthen my understanding of the prereqs doing the target topic
this is backwards
you strengthen your understanding of the target topic by strengthening your understanding of all the prerequisites
math is like a ladder, without the bottom rungs you will not be able to reach the higher rungs, and if your bottom rungs are unstable and wobbly, you will have a harder time reaching the top
Yeah trying to sprint before you can crawl isn't a great idea
Reads langlands papers before learning what is a group
Becomes a crank
Math is learnt by doing. If you don't practice active reading/doing, then don't expect to learn.
i don’t always have the time to but i do try to sit down and work through the examples + exercises
problem is i do it too sporadically 😔
and it comes back to bite me in the ass
sure i can do well on exams but my understanding of the material is uh
sus
yeah as described in those quotes
now obviously that bodes very poorly for if i decide to do grad school
how do i get myself out of this mess
try asking professors for course materials in advance of the term
and try to at least study a bit of it on break
i did a bit of prereading for analysis and it did help
so i should prob do more of that so im not as swamped during the term
try skimming or skipping those intros?
If u read a maths book like a narrative u are a mystery to me
I mean sure maths have a sort of abstract story to tell about the objects in them so I kinda get it but also I just start with the exercises and work backwards
I prefer Birkhoff and MacLane's book
guys, i know chances are low, but i need notes and problems for this course real bad, lost them somewhere a few years ago and now trying to revise the course's contents. The course is taught in the Math Department for Math majors in Trinity College, Dublin. They used to have an archive that contained this course as well but by now it's gone. If anybody was/is a student there in the Math Department, please, let me know if you have it.
idk why but i cant insert the picture of a course
it's called MAU11202 Advanced calculus
its content is
Vector-valued functions: parametric curves, calculus, change of parameter.
Partial derivatives: definition, chain rule, gradients, maxima and minima.
Multiple integrals: double and triple integrals, surface area.
if anybody knows by any chance a course similar to this, share it with me, please
There is no shortage of sources that will cover these topics
Is there any reason it needs to be specifically the notes and problems from the trinity college Dublin course?
it was so easy up until section 1.11, example problems, then suddenly it was hard 
can I read ireland rosen classic intro to modern number theory after artin
Yes
ireland has a lot of algebraic concepts
inside the theory and exercise
what will i learn from ireland?
so Is the consensus to do as many problems as you possibly can inside the math textbook?
well i was revising these particular courses, wanted to learn it the way it's supposed to be learnt, cause all the previous courses supply a student with the needed prerequisites
anyway. i would like to cover the mentioned topics with some rigor. could you recommend some books/notes?
<@&268886789983436800>
Yeah but make sure you do the Galois theory
yes, learn by doing
has anyone here read "from groups to geometry and back" by Katok and Climenhaga? if so, how was it?
i havent done any AA, i've done analysis and some LA
hubbard or shifrin
haven't finished reading a mind for numbers but it's quite fascinating
Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra and Differential Forms: A Unified Approach
this one?
buy here
much cheaper than amazon
don't bother with the ebook, they have some shitty drm thing for it
thx
I wouldnt say as many as you possibly can, but a juducious selection certainly
You can't do every problem and likely wouldn't gain much from doing so, but picking a reasonable selection from every chapter is usually a good idea. I tend to pick 2 or 3 problems that look fairly straight forward, an apply the definition type question and a selection of 2-4 problems which look more non-trivial from each chapter. Of course modulate that accordingly, if you have more time, or if you struggled with a section do more, if the section didnt have much of interest do less etc.
I would say as much as you possibly can
doing extra problems never hurts
Any books on graph theory?
Diestel or West's text are the two I've seen recommended the most
🗿yup I used to absolutely hate math back in 6th and 7th grade
I would cry at the thought of studying math for an exam
But eventually I found math content on youtube like Numberphile and 3Blue1Brown and this server 🔥 and saw math for what it actually was
DRM for content people “buy” is so evil
Chartrand has good books. There’s a dover one for very cheap.
Same man, everything my perception my likeness changed in 9th for mathematics
whats drm
Digital rights management, basically you don't really own the data you have a licence
DRM should probably more properly be called Digital Restrictions Management
It is institutionalized theft. You will never own what you buy as long as it has DRM limiting your rights. You have a limited license to access the content (for an indefinite period of time) that they can take away or limit further whenever.
Laws allow this so /shrug
Thing is Anything as-a-Service allows for annual recurring revenue, which is king in any profitability model
I think putting it like that sends the wrong message though. We all have finite time with an infinite number of problems, possibly should include the asterisk of without taking up too much time
I mean
That might seem obvious to you, but I dont think it inherantly is
please tell me any good book which tells you all about geometry with lot of problems and teaches you to write geometry proofs?
no
hundreds of such books have been written
aops intro to geometry might be a good place to start tho
on a more serious note
IM ALWAYS SERIOUS 😾
thnxx i start from today then, lets hope it will turn out goood
it is somewhat more challenging than standard geometry texts but does a better job introducing proofs imo
i belive u man! im desperate to study even ifs challenging im ready to take on (frist day motivaion be le*)
but i dont have belief in motivation
Does anybody have tips on resources regarding mathematics and voting systems? I’ve started digging into balloting systems and winner criterion’s here and there, but it’d be nice to have a comprehensive resource to learn from.
Doing an reu where ill be studying multisymplectic and polysymplectic forms but i havent ever formally learned about differential forms or manifolds. Any book or resource i can use to get familiar with thr material?
I also may have to work with operads, so any good introductory resource for that would be helpful too
idk why i searched for robin hobb in this server but i did and this is one of the most pleasant surprises i could have received
Obviously, drawing Tikz figures is a more productive endeavor that one strives towards 
what book is this
anyone have any good books on finite element methods?
brenner scott is the canonical text
but it’s kind of difficult
bartels numerical approximation of pdes and braess finite element theory are good too
is it up to date
it’s 2008 so maybe not the most modern methods
but for general theory of finite element yeah
i think if you mastered that book you could probably understand any modern research paper
Any combinatorics book for beginners with answer sheets to the questions?
How did you feel regarding the book's introduction to concepts?
Does the author start with an example that serves as motivation to the more general concept or?
where appropriate, sure, but a lot of the initial objects and definitions you work with in combinatorics aren't that difficult to grasp
i really wish people would stop throwing around the "concept" buzzword
it's been used and abused to the point of being completely meaningless
also i'm not the biggest fan of the bona text for a complete newcomer to combo
i like pikhal and tikhal
i'd almost be tempted to recommend the aops textbooks for a gentler introduction (intro minus the first few chapters which are clearly written for early middle schoolers + intermediate)
college level classes don’t mean anything if it’s just calc1
see AoPS’ article on the “calculus trap”, calculus is hardly taught in any substantially rigorous/challenging way in the US
if on the other hand they’re taking and performing well in traditional upper level classes like analysis, etc
then that’s smth to take particular note of
sad
Honours calculus and multivariable calculus class in UGA
(spivak for calculus, shifrin for multivariable)
Interested people may read good books or they may just read any old crap they can find haha
It can go both ways 100%
whats the best calc tb
spivak, courant and apostol
no those are big boy textbooks
i want an easy one
then, you won't learn well
I used Stewart's Calculus
a course of pure mathematics g. h. hardy
Maybe it's better if you just select the single topics you wanna learn and google them
Such as "limits and asymptotes lecture notes"
ill just go the textbook route
how is aops calc
ive used aops books before and i like em
alr
it's three semesters worth of content
half a year for 3 semesters is a pretty good deal
Yeah, it usually take about that or longer as part of a course. It just kinda is a lot of content.
The AoPS book is fabulous
No Calc 3 but imo it’s the best intro to calculus since it combines challenging calculus (not analysis) problems while still having a solid amount of proof based thinking
stick with rngs and rings
then go ahead, tell me a better fitting word? Since when did "concept" Become a buzzword? Sure, a concept is a collection of releated thoughts, often thought-out and structured but it is not equivalent to theory. You are right here, but does it really matter?
@old elk
@
see: chatgpt’s enshittification of k12 math ed
and people throwing around the term while not having the faintest clue what they’re talking about
Anyone know any good book for someone who use to love math, to gain love in math again
a book in a field of math you like
I see thanks a lot
The colors surrounding the citations suggest to me this is a paper
damn i thought sour drop would rainbolt the book by recognizing the pixels
LOOOL
why'd they delete the post? did they think i was getting on their case for posting something that isn't from a book in #book-recommendations?
well i have the image from neam's algebra thread in #groups-rings-fields
i only wanted to know where the source was from
thanks
i entered a string from the text
same lmao
it ended up being a book
Glorified set of lecture notes
I kinda stand by this being a pdf
I really wanted to say that but obviously all these things are PDFs
I just don’t consider something that isn’t getting printed a book
the reaction of
after like 2 questions sent me
vakil's rising sea before it got published by PUP: 😭
I believe the book was mentioned above
thanks genius 🙄
It's prolly becaues this thing is copyrighted. The structure matches the texts from the Stanford math department so I think it's a textbook for one of their math courses.
oh wait nvm
looks like the link was already given
It does look very similar to the stanford texts tho. Maybe it's just a pdf thing?
i don't think fonts or formatting considerations are necessarily specific to a school
right but they could have given the title and author
or if they didn't know, they could have said "idk"
stack exchange
oreilly maybe? although it's probably more software engineering than computer science...
Where is a good place to read about modules? I'm currently taking a class on Rings and Modules and we just started learning about modules but there is no provided textbook or reference material. So any book, website or document recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
Thank u sm
i'm looking for a book that covers real analysis in R^n. i'm fine if it assumes real analysis in R as a prerequisite
or just in R^2/R^3 instead of R^n is fine too
Atiyah also got modules
can anyone recommenD book which has good theory FOR JEE EXAM MATHS
and conceptual qns too for beginner to advanced level
munkres, maybe
theres also spivak but youre gonna want to have the errata open
Does munkres have an analysis book?
no he means just jump to topology
or wait
he does have that manifolds book
oh true, the first four chapters are multivariate analysis
I liked Tao as a supplementary book
analysis on manifolds
https://classicalrealanalysis.info/documents/TBB-AllChapters-Landscape.pdf this is a fine book, lots of good end of section exercises and every chapter ends with challenges problems some of which have a hint at the end, if its too bulky for you you can still keep it as a side reference
it does do R^2 specifically at times as well and follows up with the slightly more general R^n case and the end also has some metric space content i think?
Algebra:
Sets, Relations, and Functions
Complex Numbers and Quadratic Equations
Matrices and Determinants
Permutations and Combinations
Binomial Theorem and Its Applications
Sequences and Series
Calculus:
Limits, Continuity, and Differentiability
Differential Equations
Integral Calculus
Application of Derivatives
Application of Integrals
Coordinate Geometry:
Straight Lines
Conic Sections
Circles
Parabola
Ellipse
Hyperbola
Trigonometry:
Trigonometric Functions
Identities and Equations
Properties of Triangles
Inverse Trigonometric Functions
Vectors and 3D Geometry:
Vectors
Three-Dimensional Geometry
Probability and Statistics:
Probability
Statistics (mean, median, mode, standard deviation)
this is the portion
do not flood chat
which is the best book for basic to advance mmath
sorry
what this
the portion
Thank u
Mathematical analysis zorich-2
Do you guys know a book (pdf or digital copy) for algebra that goes from the basics to advance?
are you talking about school algebra or abstract algebra
Khan Academy is great for that
aops intro to algebra really does a great job for it
or you can use khan academy like neamesis said
or openstax if you want it legit free
or any of a few standard textbooks that aren't
there definitely are some
it's not like every springer math is a winner either
How has it been useful to you?
Communication with others
Like debating
Or just talking to someone you are not sure whether to trust or not
We've come to dislike most books in general and cast them off in favour of textbooks to satisfy all reading needs, no fiction, ofc
to prepare for a course in case you were allowed to skip content
or to prepare for research
or to look for information needed while youre actively researching
just randomly wondering what people think about Hubbard's book on vector calculus
you should start looking into that
"Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms: a unified approach"
doing research during undergrad only gets more and more important as the years go by
We like it, but as always, we recommend awaiting a wider variety of responses
ask an advisor in ur math department
none if you're interested in a field of pure math
maybe theres an internal REU program you can apply to next year
what?
best you can do is ask for a reading course
++ ug research is one of the top things schools look for
highly unlikely, but if you manage to publish something not too bad in an actual journal as a single author
It'd probably put you over 4.0 gpa students
Hello, does anyone have access to Dummit & Foote in PDF version ? like a recent version ?
<@&268886789983436800> user seeks pirated materials
Unfortunately, by TOS we are not allowed to sanction distribution of pirated materials on here
Piracy is no party ahh 🏴☠️
Ok ok, sorry that I asked ...
Aight. Ty
<@&268886789983436800> ngl I don't think this should be here
This weird housing thing
Hello, can anyone recommend books about aerodynamics for someone who knows math but barely knows anything about physics
Any textbook recommendations on singular/cellular (co)homology via simplicial sets
gr
hey
How would i start preparing for international math modelling competition???
Google it and you will find out eventually
beat me to it
there's a pin with reviews of various books in algebraic topology
thanks I didn't see the pin
but I'm not sure if any of them are really what I'm looking for
my prof works very category theoretically with simplicial sets
What is the best algebra book to prepare for calculus 1?
?
Im taking calculus 1 but i gotta learn algebra before taking it.
your best option is working through a precalclus textbook. it will cover all the essential topics to help you succeed in calc1 e.g. general algebra, logarithms, trigonometry, functions, etc.
i personally went straight to calculus so i cant speak to specific textbooks without a bit of guesswork -- a bit of googling, and trial and error, should help find a textbook thats right for you (look at google book previews or google "[book name] pdf" to see the quality
either that or khan acadmey / organic chem tutor (personally, i'd use khan academy and supplement it w videos from organic chem tutor when im confused, then find additional problems in a textbook, e.g. stewart's)
There was a crypto bot above my message
I personally like James Stewart's "Algebra & Trigonometry". But, Sullivan's "Algebra & Trigonometry" is good as well. Sullivan's textbook is more "beginner-friendly" compared to Stewart. In Stewart's textbook, some parts of the explanation are omitted because the author assumes that you have the background knowledge. However, in Sullivan's textbook, I think, he thoroughly explain things without assuming anything from the reader.
guys i wanna lean maths
from basics high school math
to advance
which resources book can i follow
anyone
hllo
I'm mod creator
then ask your professor!
side note:
if you’re learning alg top for the first time, just pick up any book you’ll actually work through.
his book recommendations are all in the pinned message
maybe I'll give tom Dieck a try
what level do you mean by advanced?
khan academy is good for basic math up to high school level
Sour drop i lost the link you sent me (a red book on logic)
can you please resend it to me
any one read Proofs from THE BOOK?
heard really good reviews about it. I read the first bits and it's quite nice. I don't know about learning proofs from it though.
Which book I have to read to improve my Trigonometry
A Study Guide A re-titled, expanded version of the old Teach Yourself Logic study guide. This is a book length guide to the main topics and some suitable texts either for teaching yourself logic by individual self-study, or to supplement a university course. You only need to read just the first half-dozen pages to see […]
Best book for ISI Maths Exam
Very strange request but what’s a book that will get me to lie algebra cohomology
There may be better recomendations, I dont know the subject myself, but chapter 7 of Wiebel covers this, so theres at least an intro

Aw thank you ^^
Yea I found a full pdf version of the book in an archive of mine
Hello guys do you know any good engineering books before i enter college so i can master thos skills
depends on what engineering
I'm doing a course called mathematics methods and modelling and i'm currently only doing discrete equations but we arent working with a textbook - any recommendations
Engineering mathematics by K.A. Stroud
But if you ask me I would avoid buying any textbook till you start classes
I'm doing the same course as a former classmate but in 2 different institutions. Same name and same ranking but they are not the same
Best Calculus textbooks recommendations for high school students , please
james stewart calculus or larson calculus
Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman is in general a really good book.
Yeah
Haven't gone deep into it but looks promising
i see i have heard about that book
i see still im wriitng my entrance exams and results will be back by next month so till then i have to wait but thanks for the advice
Thomas or Stewart: easy, intuitive, covers almost* everything well; exhaustive amounts of examples and practice questions. perfect for anyone studying anything stem related, and the prescriptive texts
*imo they’re both lacking in their explanations of epsilon-delta proofs but, unless you’re going into undergrad math, this is useless anyways
I found Spivak or Apostol too hard for when I first learnt calculus. Getting a bit of mathematical maturity and returning to these texts for a second course in calculus is how I would approach it
Supplementing any of these texts with youtube and online notes (e.g. Paul’s) is what I’d highly recommend — no matter what textbook you choose
I've realize i'm not the best at math. Mainly in the areas of calculus, probability, trig and LA.
Are there any book recommendations for these?
yeah fr they just used the bounded condition to solve questions( i'm using thomas btw)
I see there’s a springer sale going on right now, any favorites that people would recommend?
Which sale?
CM is pretty much completed 100 years ago lol
and that book is 15 years old or so
also, do you want something with manifolds? since you said ug CM i did't think of those stuff
ok that's on the math side
dw about it
for a first into, manifolds will be more than overkill
can you describe what you don't like in spivak so I can reccomend you something?
springer doesn't have many CM books afaik
The “Yellow Sale” advertised on their main site. I’m not sure if it’s a specific subset of books that’s on sale. It says up to 50% off, but I am unfamiliar with the majority of the titles that appear to actually be 50% off.
okay than, in what aspects do you not like ug physics textbooks
like where do you want imorıveent?
what textbook are you using rn?
The springer website is unforgivably bad, i can genuinely never work out how to buy their books
This seems to be the list of books on sale: https://resource-cms.springernature.com/springer-cms/rest/v1/content/20141104/data/v5
Chipper wants to go from Mario Kart to Space Shuttle
Yo bro how's spongebob doing
ok but that's to be expected for 100 level physics 
it's for people who:
- failed AP physics in high school
- just need to take it for their otherwise unrelated STEM degree
- etc
in which case sure they'll handwave the shit out of everything
okay maybe you can try out something like taylor's CMi that's way better in terms of rigor but also has a lot more content so you have to pick and read
you can look at marion and thornton too
I am compiling set theory for analysis and line algebra, do you recommend that I read the entire first chapter of Bourbaki's book and if not, what section of chapter 1 should I be aware of?

I found this chapter on mit ocw and its super super helpful, thank you so much!!!
I personally have my own stack and occasionally carry a few around when needed, but most of my stuff is pdfs on google drive
The best book I read is 4 found dead
mfw when I wanted to do research in CM 
it's god's gift to this wonderful world
I mean, you can, why not
my first paper was on CM
but you are not getting a job publishing CM papers
unless ur a mech eng ig
Hi I want to start learning real analysis, i am familiar with proofs(olympiad style problems) and calculus, but not any higher math, i wanted to use ocw, so should I use 18.100A or 18.100C
I just finished watching the first lecture of 18.100A, all of it was stuff i knew. Seeing the titles of the other lectures, i can confidently say I don't know those things, but since i found it quite easy, if i did 18.100C would it cover everything that's covered in 18.100A and be accessible even if i don't know higher math? That's my question more specifically
in general, i'd avoid judging the difficulty of a course by its first lecture
I will come up with Topological Lagrangian Field Theory in CM 
often the first lecture reviews stuff or goes over very basic notions, which means it's not representative of how difficult the course will be
I think you can find info about the course and they will usually tell you what the prerequisties for the course are
especially in MIT OCW
You do not need bourbaki for this, most linear algebra and analysis texts will cover the set theory they expect you to know
Not really, always on pdf. Its more comfortable unless I really like the book/author
okay, ill stick to 18.100A then, thanks!
Most of the time no coz pdf is available so
How would i start preparing for international math modelling competition???
I am in grade 11 rn need beginner book to make my foundation strong
does anyone have a recommendation for optimization books
something with like "using matlab or python" or something
stop spamming the same question over and over, you’re only making it more likely for people to ignore you
Hey I'm studying right now some Dijkstra guarded command language to prove the correctness of algorithms, and at some point the book I'm using right now motivates the idea of Hoare logic. Everything seems somewhat like discrete mathematics (Dijkstra uses weakest precondition which is based on a topic of discrete math AFAIK).
Do you have any book that could escalate up to the point of atleast grasping those deductive systems?, I tried some AI recommendations but most of them just mention stuff.
So I start with the algebra part of bourbaki?
Also, I don't know if I can reformulate my question a little and post them on their respective channels, being more specific #theoretical-cs #proofs-and-logic and #discrete-math
Will that comply to the rules of the server?
This is not true
Current research is just not what you would think it is
well yea but i meant ug type CM
like for example P&S and Schwartz tell you very different things about renormalization
so that's why you might wanna prefer a newer book such as Schwarz
what? people actually do research in classical mechanics these days? what kind of stuff is it?
Well it depends on what you allow to fall under the scope of classical mechanics. Geometric mechanics is a good example
seems like mathphys rather than physics
How would i start preparing for international math modelling competition???
I am in grade 11 rn need beginner book to make my foundation strong
maybe people in competitive math channel will be able to help
how are you accessing the unlisted videos?
where are you finding them
wait, i tried inspect element then clicked the element conveniently labeled "steady-paywall" and deleted it
is that how you did it?
hey what are some great books to understand set theory for a high-school graduate going into uni soon?
@heady ember
does anyone have the book 'Advanced Mathematica' by Jude Ndubuisi Onicha? I was thinking about getting it and wanted an opinion if it is worthwhile.
Enderton's Elements of Set Theory provides a gentle intro to axiomatic set theory. If you have some familiarity with rigorous mathematics, then baby Jech might be suitable too.
Thoroughly revised, updated, expanded, and reorganized to serve as a primary text for mathematics courses, Introduction to Set Theory, Third Edition covers the basics: relations, functions, orderings, finite, countable, and uncountable sets, and cardinal and ordinal numbers. It also provides five...
Enderton introduces proofs?
thanks
Yesn't? Idk what exactly you mean by "introduce proofs".
I just learnt to write proofs... by writing them --- trying to come up with sound arguments and writing them out in a coherent way.
Can someone recommend me books for my first year b.tech mathematics ?
I kind of want not so much basic theory neither to less theory in book + there should qn practice qn in book
Teaching you how to write proofs that is
Yeah, well of course. But that's rather vague.
Not really, it's the same as "teaching you set theory"
you're overthinking it
I did what I said
you showed me that CA 16 was paywalled
so I checked his website
went to the CA video list
clicked on the link he gave for 16
saw it was the newer posted video I linked
Eh. Its like saying that you're teaching someone how to draw; there's a lot of variation as to how exactly you're teaching them drawing.
Its not like, say, teaching analysis, where at the core you have the relevant analysis theorems and the corresponding proofs --- possibly packaged with some nice structuring and exposition.
Here, you’ll find my complete video series on Complex Analysis, presented in the correct order. Alongside the videos, I provide helpful text explanations. To test your knowledge, take the quizzes and refer to the PDF versions of the lessons if needed. You can also download a book related to this course, though it is still in draft form. If you...
was it this link?
I just used the top menu from the homepage
but yea, that takes you to the top of the list, scan down to 16
I don't get the Sign In reminder though, maybe because I have an adblocker
i have ublock origin
but this doesn't get blocked
I'm on ipad safari, idk
does it really block you from seeing the rest of the page
or just an annoyance
it does block me from seeing the rest of the page
actually even when i delete the steady-paywall line i only see the second vid and not the rest of them
i'm on pc atm
hmmm, strange
ok, so I tried to see on way back machine
and the Sign In appears there as I scan down but then disappeared
try it
https://web.archive.org/web/20250219114921/https://thebrightsideofmathematics.com/courses/complex_analysis/overview/
oops forget that, I thought it disappears but it doesn't
for all I got to say here is Wings of Fire
I was thinking of buying Dieudonne's History of Algebraic and Differential Topology, but it costs somewhere between 150 and 250 USD 
Anyone have suggestions for other books that mix exposition with some historical context? Doesn't have to be a lot of history, I like Stillwell's Naive Lie Theory, where he just has a section at the end of each chapter where he gives a short overview of how and when things was developed
Not a recommendation, but I love when books do end a section with overviews, history and possibly further research and topics, huge fan of it. My noncom rings class had that, every time someone’s name came up they got a biography at the end of the chapter, and some discussion of where all these problems came from
easy
@normal crystal looks like my method might be patched?
Welcome to my complete video series on Measure Theory, featuring 23 videos that are carefully structured to help you grasp the key concepts. Along with the videos, you’ll find some text explanations. You can test your understanding using the quizzes and refer to the PDF versions of the lessons whenever needed. If you have any questions, don’...
if i try to go directly to the relevant page, then i only see the overview
probably should have just copied the link and had it downloaded instead of accessing the video directly through youtube
I don't know what you want me to see
but I can still access the video links, pdfs, quiz
maybe try another adblocker and/or different browser
I have a professor that has research in functional data analysis and I am trying to understand his work and it requires operator theory. Any recommendations on resources for this? I am starting with building a base on bright side of mathematics videos as my background in functional analysis is weak.
I understand the basic ideas of functional analysis but not much past that
ah, you wouldn't happen to be using a script blocker would you?
i just added noscript
now i can see every video
thankfully he's better at math than webdev🤡
well actually steady has some guidelines for setting up a paywall
i got automodded for trying to post the help page link
but it does explicitly say that people can bypass the paywall by turning off javascript
- Despite having a hard JavaScript paywall, non-members can still access your content. A handful of people may take advantage of this, but in our experience it's not worth worrying about. Normally, members are motivated by wanting to support a publication rather than accessing exclusive content. As a publisher, you stand to gain more from putting your energy into your work and maintaining a good relationship with your community.
tbh though, I'm still confused why he would make one random video in a list paywalled then use a different posted version of the same video in the list on his website
I can't tell if it's intended or not
i would assume it's to prevent people from double-paying for the same content
you can either access paywalled videos on youtube through youtube membership or you can get the videos from steady
hmm, maybe
I interpreted his site as saying the ad free versions were the perk
not that some videos on the main lists are restricted
i mean he has a few other things like actual books that aren't so easily accessible
but i don't really care about those
his bread and butter has always been the videos
yea, the 3 books, the lecture pdfs, the quizzes, the ad free videos
those are the perks
I think some random extra videos maybe, not on a list
that's why I don't get the random videos being paywalled
they could have been his most watched videos
barring the first few of a playlist
they're decent and they used to be free
sometimes
Oh damn that sounds like a sick book
One of my favorite math quotes is from him
There is hardly any theory which is more elementary [than linear algebra], in spite of the fact that generations of professors and textbook writers have obscured its simplicity by preposterous calculations with matrices.
Kind of
~~i never took first course in LA, i started with Axler ~~
Next time I'm teaching a linear algebra course, I'm definitely going to steal "Preposterous calculations with matrices" as a chapter title.
I mean mostly not good for the first course.
Whats wrong with calculations. I feel like learning how to calculate a Jordan decomposition enhances your understanding. You only need to do 2 to get a significant increase in understanding.
Even if the way you do by hand isn't state of the art, proving that the algorithm you did by hand is correct is a good exercise
Any recommendations on advanced number theory papers/books that aren't surveys or introductions?
Agree! Did you follow a particular book in your noncom rings class?
Tu's Intro to Manifolds starts each section with a page or so of historical context
Cool, thanks 
They were notes written by the lecturer and her student, which was based on a course he did at Oxford which was based on an introduction to non commutative Noetherian rings by Goodearl and Warfield
So like vaguely based on that book, but I don’t think it has the history haha
I see, thanks 
Can anyone suggest me a book for calculus and one for algebra? I have a basic understanding of both the concepts and am looking to get a deeper understanding.
The point of the quote is not "computation bad" but rather emphasizing a purely computational approach to LA (or any field of math) is bad. Computation and intution should be balanced when presenting any material because they go hand in hand 
that's awesome
Any nice ethnography suggestions chat?
Recommendation on godel's incompleteness theorem ?
I used it for my first course and it worked great. But we’re all different. Can’t hurt to just pop it open and start reading. It’s available for free on Sheldon Axler’s (the author) website
If it doesn’t work for you. Another more applied and perhaps more accessible book is Linear Algebra Done Wrong by Treil. Also available for free on their website
Personally we also loved reading FIS, so that may also be your cup of tea
it's marketed as a second semester book, but you could use it as a first introduction, it's more abstract than a typical first introduction though
Linear algebra done somewhat right
any recommendation for those chaps book? pls
for which
khan academy
book?
kay
Is aops precalc good for precalc or are there better options?
I did all of aops alg and geo
like a textbook? or a pop introduction
Anyone here read "Using the Borsuk-Ulam Theorem Lectures on Topological Methods in Combinatorics and Geometry"?
have you done the problems in this book? they're really hard, am i missing some prerequesites?

