#help-0
1 messages · Page 1008 of 1
I think I've seen a similar exercise not too long ago. Gimme a sec and I should be able to find a proof for this
Prove the following (simplified) variant of Brouwer's fixed point theorem:
Every $f \in C(I, \mathbb{R})$ with $I := [-1, 1] \subset \mathbb{R}$ and $f(I) \subseteq I$ has a fixed point
illuminator3
IVT should work for this quite easily
my first question or the whole question
this
if IVT proves that then this must also be true
because lipschitz constant implication is both ways
no
huh
or give a proper proof because I don't see what you mean by this
nvm
Closed by @karmic rapids
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
Start by multiplying E2 and E1
Yes
Now find its inverse as AB = I is possible iff A and B are inverse of each other.
You know about inverse?
You did E1 × E2 it has asked for E2 × E1
Ooo
Yes
Bruh there's no need of inverse it's unnecessary mess
oh thats why
I checked multiplication but didn't check that.
Alright im going to redo it thank you
What’s the difference
You multiply the two numbers either way
They are not numbers
It's different in Matrices these aren't you friendly neighborhood numbers
@iron forge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @iron forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what would be an efficient way to approach this question
wdym
idk ill have to play with it
like if you can bound some cells say the two right above the central cell
leaving only a single option
my friend did it by using constants for each box in the bottom row and working his way up
and then subsituting a bunch of sim equations
but thats long
not sure what you mean 🤔
it must be something about the double counting
right
like you can get the sum of the second row very quickly
because you know 16 gets counted twice
youll have a similar outlier or whatever you wanna call it with the central element in the last row
wdym by outlier?
like multiple times counted
they give you the sum of the rows
im just trying to track

i think this is the way
like
the difference between rows is the uhh
sum of the centers
right
so then the sum of the middle three elements in the bottom must bee
12
hmm
oh, so vc?
yeah will type tho
okay
one sec
let me fix the screen
discord bugging in browser lol
ok got it
i got all of them besides 2nd last
maybe i couldve of if i continued but i felt it was pointless effort lol
yeah i got 45
yh
yes
yeah
ok
ok
ok yeah
oh i see
yes this seems really fast
so the main part was seeing the pattern that the mid is the difference
yeah this does seem pretty fast
thanks a lot


.close
.close
Closed by @rocky dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
pls help me
which step is troubling you?
well
I did the problem
but im finding different answers online
3 websites w 3 different answers
so im second guessing myself
step 3 mostly
alright let me graph it and post a picture to talk about
so I did step 1 I feel good about that
-4/5, 4/5, -1, 1
I graphed step 2
so im good on that
its step 3 and onwards where I need help
i know fubini but i dont know what you mean
yes
ok are there
ok this is the rubric for it
what is this
are there disjoint regions?
@raw latch pls help
okay got it
the lower one
what do you mean the lower one
thats right
i see that your right
now for step 4
what are the upper and lower limits
what do you think
I’m new here
@raw latch pls help
<@&286206848099549185> hello? please help me im stuck
<@&286206848099549185>
@obtuse grail Has your question been resolved?
@obtuse grail Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If $|G:H|=n,$ find a homomorphism of $G$ into $S_n$ whose kernel is contained in $H.$
Can anyone help me with some hw problems?
@bronze mauve Has your question been resolved?
ok so i figured this part out
this is the full problem that i am stuck on
i figured out the hint
monkeman
<@&286206848099549185> i need help on a few things
i don't know exactly how to define an explicit homomorphism from $G$ to $\text{Sym}(K)$ and i don't know how this exactly connects to proving the original problem
monkeman
Closed by @bronze mauve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, how do I show there's no global extremes for this fn?
what have you tried so far?
I have my critical points
which are?
(0,0,-1)
(1,-1,-1)
which (0,0,-1) is a saddle
and (1,-1,-1) is a local min
also I got there's no singular points as well?
@slate jolt hello?
oh sorry
isnt a singular point just related to curves?
what would be the definition of this (i didnt do differential geometry in english soi i'm not too familiar with the terms)
my definition says that a singular point is where the f(c) is not differentiable
at point c
oh ok
so yeah
you have now your only possible global extrem which is (1,-1,-1)
you must now find a point that is smaller than it
for global min?
yeah, its a local min
so for it to be a global min
it must be smaller than every value
but there are points at which f is smaller
just give one of them
so the reasoning is:
if there is a global extreme it is also a critical point
you find all of them
examine the geometry nearby them
if there are local extremes
show that they're only local
Closed by @still storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this might be a stupid question
but
a sequence has to be bounded in order to converge. so, if we want to prove that a sequence, say a(n) converges, we have to find a bound for a(n), so thats why we use cauchy's condensation test right?
I think it has to be more then just bounded
converging --> bounded
but not the other way around
sin(n) is bounded
cauchy's condensation is much stronger than saying that the sequence is bounded
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
right right
Closed by @fierce oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help?
@narrow junco Has your question been resolved?
hwo can u pls explain?
Just ignore that user, they need to read #❓how-to-get-help first because they started asking a question in other channels
okok
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
How can I calculate an x,y point knowing only the radius and angle of a vector?
Using sin and cos
those are basically black boxes to me
To break it into x and y components
don't understand how they give us the x y components
sine is a ratio of r/x
No
Yes to this
No to this
how can we do r/y if we don't know what y is
dldh06
How do I find y?
I dont understand how only knowing the angle and r can give us y, unless we just manually pinpoint it on the graph with our eye balls
multiply both sides by 65?
Yes
yep
You use that same process with $sin \theta = \frac{y}{r}$
dldh06
is he looking for y or theta?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is that not 46 = y / 5
No it's not that
It's $\sin \theta$
dldh06
I thought sin theta just literally translates to y/r
like that is the function body
just y/r
Theta is a variable
Sine is a function
I dont see what the word sin is adding
It's a trig function
and the function definition is just y/r
remember soh cah toa
But sin theta is a value
the value is not used in the function definition
,w sin pi
dldh06
It is a function, like how y = 2x
You don't magically get rid of the x
And say y = 2
Same thing with sin
like this
It's part it
when I see functions like f(x) = 2x
the input is being used in the function
x appears in the function body
where is theta in sin(theta) = y/r
It's in the definition
The definition is y/r
I don't see the input value being used anywhere in the function body
Hence $\sin \theta$
dldh06
sine (theta) is like y of (angle)
It is defined as $\sin \theta =\frac{y}{r}$
dldh06
Do you see how in f(x) = 2x, x is appearing twice?
once in the function signature, the other in its definition?
I only see theta appearing once
in the signature
not in the definition
the input x is just implied there, the signature is replaced with the output
But x appears once
You need to review trig functions
Here is a short video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvoFgL4P_rw&ab_channel=TheOrganicChemistryTutor
This trigonometry video tutorial provides a basic introduction into the six trigonometric functions such as sine, cosine, tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant. It provides the equations and formulas associated with these trigonometric functions as they relate to the unit circle.
New Trigonometry Playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=...
it's fine for it to appear once it it's in the actual mechanics of the function
if I sae y = theta/r, I'd be fine
Even in the image, it's $\sin \theta =\frac{y}{r}$
dldh06
For trig functions, it's defined including the theta, meaning for example, $\sin \theta = \frac{y}{r}$
dldh06
dldh06
You will return the y coordinate at 45 degrees
Meaning $\sin 45 = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$
dldh06
You can question all you want. Overall, you are not understanding the concept of trig functions properly
all I know is that sin is a ratio of two sides. I don't get how it works if we know nothing about the sides
this only applies to a unit circle right?
Yes, that example
other than it's magnitude
You know r, and theta
Meaning you can plug in theta
Into the equation I gave
$\sin \theta = \frac{y}{r}$
the equation being sin theta = y / r
dldh06
Yes
sin 46 = y/5
y = 230?
How?
i dont think thats y
What did you do to get that value?
Multiplied both sides by 5
46 * 5 = 230
Y/5 * 5 = y
here ill write it for you
Literally this statement here
what am I supposed to do with that word
sin
I dont get what it's doing in the equation
It's a function
I dont know what ln is
$sin(45)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$
U multiplied it with the magnitude?
Natural log
Pi Creature
No, unit circle
Do you know log?
I dont
Like $\log_{10}2$
dldh06
Yeah I haven't learned logarithms yet
Yes
jnmwn
similarly, $$\log_{9}\left(9^x\right) = x$$
jnmwn
you can replace the number with any other
$sin(\theta)=\frac{y}{r}$
Uk $\theta$=46 degrees and u already know $r$ so just create an equation for y
besides like 1 and 0 because they’re weird
Where did logarithms came here 
It's because they "remove" the sin
Pi Creature
And just do 46 = y/5
so log is to exponentials like square root is to squaring essentially
Ah i see
By they u mean m right?
can you show me the equation
I have no idea how I'm supposed to handle the word "sin"
in the equatio
Try it yourself at least
So logs came into play because logs are part of the definition, like how sin is part of the calculation
sin is y
Uts not a word
Yes
Sin is a function
It's a button on the calculator
What's a button?
wait so when I read sin(angle) = y/r
Well you wanna isolate y, correct
is the statement sin(angle) == y/r or sin(angle) = y/r
No, the calculator, uses taylor series, to find the value
OK so that is why I'm confused
Yeah no it would have to like memorize a fuck ton then
Overall the concept is $\sin \theta = \frac{y}{r}$
dldh06
Where theta is the angle, y is the y value/coordinate, and r is the radius
I've been interpreting it like this if anyone programs
function sin(angle) {
return y/r
}
but you're saying the definition of sin
is hidden away
some big Taylor series thing
OK so then
is it possible to get this point
without using a calculator
Not easily
/ depending on a super complicated Taylor series formula
Tbh, just keep sin(46) as sin(46)
If you wanted to use trig functions without a calculator, the easiest values would be the ones that line up with the unit circle
It's mathematically equivalent to the actual value of sin(46), being that sin(46) = sin(46)
Yes
yeah im just wanting to be able to have it all visually click
Wait are you finding the (x, y)?
so that when I'm doing game development and I use cos(angle) to get the x position of a point, I understand why
but now it's sounding like it's going to continue being a black box to me until I learn Taylor series
that I have to just be satisfied with "sine and cosine are magical black boxes that have complicated mechanics happening under the hood"
Doesn’t the game engine have a built in calculator
Oh wait that's just $(r\cos{(θ)}, r\sin{(θ)})$
yes they have sine and cosine functions built in but I dont understand how they work internally
Umbraleviathan
Wdym work internally
It's internally, how calculator does it. Because the calculator doesn't store x and y values into the memory
Taylor/Maclaurin series. Stuff you shouldn't work too much
You just need the points
But if you really wanna know
I have no idea how sine() gives an answer
It's how calculators determine the value of sine
using only angle as the information
Yes
That's what the calculator uses
@alpine sable
Use your polar identities
x = rcos(θ)
y = rsin(θ)
yeah I know that works
I just don't visually get it
when I subtract vectors, it clicks for me. I understand why the result is occuring
not here though
It’s just unit circle
the sin and cosine are magical black boxes
So for example, $\sin 45 = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$. That uses the concept of the unit circle and returns the y coordinate
dldh06
Well actually I think it's easier to show them this
sine is y/r
r(y/r) = y
💀
Use your trig ratios
sine is y/r
Multiply that by r
You get y
Because the calculator does not store the unit circle in memory, because that's based on set coordinates, the calculator uses Taylor series to calculate the values
@alpine sable does this visual and explanation help?
These two
Because you can calculate sin 46 if you wanted to, but using the unit circle, it is not on there
It's Taylor series
Have u learned calculus yet
No
It's taught in calc 2
🤡
Generally ig
Wdym sine is y/r
If you wanted sin 1.234123, the calculator will use Taylor series to find the y coordinate
I thought we established that sine is not y/r, but is just equal to it
There are btw some trig identities u can use to calculate many angles without Taylor series
Y value over radius of circle
You know that sine is the ratio of opposite/hypotenuse, correct?
Ig M is still thinking sin is a word
I'm trying to distinguish between the output of a function being equal to some formula, versus the actual definition of a function being equal to some formula
Opposite is y value and hypotenuse is r
Yes this
Yes
Me
Programming for 5 years not professional tho my hobby

Why would you wanna understand the programming behind it? I'm trying to show you why x = rcos(θ) but programming isn't gonna help
Ikr
OK, when you guys say "sine is y/r", I'm interpreting that as "the definition of the sine function, is y/r"
I'm interpreting it like this
function sin(angle) {
return y/r
}
when it sounds like what you guys actually mean, is that the output of sine(angle) is == to y/r
Yeah
Ya
sin(θ) = y/r
Yes
Tf is a long double
Sounds like something funky grunky
what do u program
import numpy as np
np.sin(46/180*np.pi)
okay so you guys mean sine == y/r, not sine = y/r
yes?
what do u pogram
That is python I think
Ok so what's the difference between == and = according to u
== only makes sense for booleans
Equivalence versus identity
If you're asking about your channel, don't try to bump your question
I mean the output of it is a bool
wdym
C++ Program to calculate the value of sin(x) and cos(x) - Given with the input as angles and the task is to calculate the value of sin(x) and cos(x) correspondi ...
I am into ML
He is using javascript
Or maybe she
To say f(x) = 2x, is to say that when you plop in an input into f(x), the internal mechanics that happen to it are 2x
or maybe deez
to say f(x) == whatever, is to say that the output of f(x) will coincide with whatever
Everyone, please type a large "Ha Ha!" in chat to appreciate the phenomenal wit shown in this extraordinary display of the highest form of humor
See
import numpy as np
theta=46
sin_theta=np.sin(theta/180*np.pi)
Done
f(x) = 2x ---- definition of a function
We can then use that function
f(2) == 4
you okay bro
Yeah but sine is a special function
you cannot be talking if you havent reached e-10 level of math
Wrong reply moment
You're trying to relate trig with code, which is overall confusing you. The general concept is $\sin \theta = \frac{y}{r}$ where you input a value for theta, and it returns a y coordinate value, with the radius of 1
dldh06
I want to understand the internal mechanics of how it's able to return a y coordinate using only an angle
you cannot understand if u do understand
For that u need to learn Taylor series
How can you get a y using just an angle
It doesn’t rly matter what formula the calculator uses for sin as long as it works
and I've been trying to show you
this is how computers compute it
without code
you guys got it all wrong
Because $\sin \theta = \frac{y}{r} \rightarrow r \cdot \sin \theta = y$

@alpine sable
Bro this channel a circus fr

its really not that hard to explain
dldh06
You know that sin(θ) is y/r
Ikr
your making the person more confused
No cares what you think
There are 5th graders who understand this stuff
True
Why do you overcomplicate
I learned in 6th grade
$r\sin{(θ)} = r\cdot\frac{y}{r} = y$
The basics ig
Same
Umbraleviathan
Ok too many cooks
Are basically ruining the dish
Lol
So one cook says bye
No code, no series
Because here
#help-0 message
And then the pot fucking exploded and caused a nuclear blowout and New Jersey took over the world
It’s not that hard
True
If this amount of trig is hard then trig problems would be like....

Pain and suffering
Wdym amount of trig is hard
Ah yes
The OP, is assuming that "sin" is just a word and not understanding that sin is a function that takes the input of the angle and returns the y coordinate
Haha
Where do we go in this photo
What's the first step
There was a funny amc12 problem I saw on trig
Label
It had both sin and cos be 1
You know r and the angle
I've always understood what sine is a function, my confusion has been that I've been interpreting sine = y/r to be the function definition rather than just an equivalence statement
My brain is fried
Not sine = y/r but sine theta = y/r
Do u understand sin and cos properly no?
Open this and read https://www.mathsisfun.com/algebra/trigonometry.html
That's all i can say
In classes, it's been taught as sine = y/r because the theta is omitted
Let us look at this like a graph
If this was a right triangle
In actuality, it's defined as sine theta = y/r
yes I've watched a billion videos about sobcahtoa. I understand that sine is equal to the ratio of opposite over hypotenuse
Then what's ur doubt about it?
How it relates to angles
Then read that doc it's clearly stated
Using a unit circle
We use a unit circle
This math video tutorial provides a basic introduction into trigonometry. It covers trigonometric ratios such as sine, cosine, and tangent. It explains how to evaluate it using right triangle trigonometry and SOHCAHTOA. In addition, it explains how to solve the missing sides of triangles and how to find the missing angles using inverse trig f...
all that tells us is that r is 1
Here watch that
it seems like M- doesnt know the basics
That is based only on the unit circle
R can be anything you want
It's scaled
a circle with 1 as the radius is called a unit circle
That's where the x and y comes from
Getting into the weeds, it's a scaling factor
This is a clown fest
The general concept where r = 1, is used with the unit circle
If r = 3, the coordinates get scaled too
r = 1
yep
yes
I'm trying to understand how sine works internally with the unit circle first
Scaling it with r later makes sense
smh
If r = 1 then sin(46) = 0.719339
Okay how do we calculate that
Using a calculator
Calculator. Just keep it as sin(46)
It's mathematically equivalent
sin(46) is a number in itself
It's irrational, but it's a number
but someone earlier said that you could understand the internal mechanics without needing to know the Taylor series
conceptually you can understand it
Ok so summarizing the entire thing first fact forget $sin(\theta)$ and $cos(\theta)$ as ratios of a triangle. Think of the unit circle u have walked a particular arc length in that unit circle the let's say the length u walked is $\theta$ this arc length is called radians. The point u end up with is $(cos(\theta), sin(\theta)$ . Now u strech the hypotenuse or scale it by a factor 5 so the x and y coordinate gets streched by a factor of 5 hence new point becomes $(5cos(\theta), 5sin(\theta))$
There's a major difference
Bro you got nice colors, I gotta deal with piss green and spoiled brown
thanks
Pi Creature
Here theta is equal 46 degrees so the arc length is 46/180*π
nvm its the same
U can calculate sin(46), cos(46) by using something called a Taylor series which will help u approximate it by hand.
But generally
Use a calculator
Now bye
It's getting into the weeds, but as mentioned, the calculator does not store the unit circle in memory, because that's just a waste of space, because between 0 and 360 degrees, there are infinitely many values. So instead of storing in on infinite amount of values and just taking up tons of memory, the calculator uses a concept, called Taylor series, and sin has a specific Taylor series formula. So instead of storing infinitely many values between 0 and 360, the calculator just needs to store one formula, has a decent amount of terms to get the accuracy high enough, to calculate sin values
I wanna buy your new rap LP
im gonna go
And to mention, trig functions are periodic, meaning every 360 degrees, it repeats, so the value at 360 is the same as 720, and so on
good luck on this
So internally, the calculator stores, these equations, to do trig, where all you do is plug in a value for x and it spits out a value, using that equation, because like I said, it's easier and takes less memory to store that equation than infinitely many values
Because you can calculate sin 1.2, if you wanted to
But I'm going too, so good bye
Look into trig and ask your teacher, that's all I got for you now
(I have a simplified proof if your brain hurts)
(Just ping or DM me)
(Also geometry dash crashed and I just lost 15 minutes of work ffs)
Ope he dead
I thought that trig stuff dates back to ancient Greece before we had calculus
why is every explanation I'm seeing for sin/cosine being these giant derivative calculus stuff equations
No calculus is needed
Lemmme show you a simplified proof
The radius has a slope, correct?
Yes
So imagine a circle on the x, y plane
Centered at 0, 0
And the radius is 1, to make things easier
The slope of that radius is y/x (rise/run)
You might also notice you can construct a triangle
So the GREEN is the radius
The shitty-drawn black line is the angle, θ
You get me?
Yes, but we don't have y/x yet. All we know is r=1 and angle=45
When you construct a right triangle, this happens:
The opposite leg becomes Y
The adjacent leg becomes X
The hypotenuse is the radius, R
And the angle between X and R is θ
Do you understand that?
Yes
Now let us look at finding what the X coordinate could be
We can understand that from this triangle, the cos(θ) = X/R
Do you understand why?
I dont
Trigonometry identities. Adjacent/hypotenuse
Okay but
this is begging the question
you can't reference the sine/cosine functions before we have established it
I have no idea what cosine(theta) is doing
It's doing this
That's what cos(θ) is doing
It's essentially taking the radius and forming a right triangle
And then taking the adjacent/hypotenuse of that triangle, for whatever θ is
How is it doing that?
I still believe that you should just go to your math teacher and spend time talking to them about this
Geometry, basically
more internal black box magic
How is it doing that?
The ratio of the adjacent side to the hypotenuse
because clearly you're saying the output of cosine is equal to that ratio
It is
I think you're getting your terminology confused
The equivalence is the definition
Mathematical definition
Mathematics apparently makes no distinction between function definitions and equivalence
and that's confusing me
saying that the output of a function is equal to some formula
You understand that we can construct a right triangle with these sides
you can't say that the formula is the definition
or how would there be an output
To begin with
I conceptually do not understand what sine(angle) could possibly be doing internally to return an output
if we apparently have no internal definition of it
except some equivalent relationship between its output and some ratio
The sine is the ratio of a supposed opposite side to its respective hypotenuse, in relation to an angle
That is its definition and formula
Formulas do not need to be things like f(x)
Internally, it's that whenever we construct a specific angle, there will always be a ratio ascribed to it given these conditions
So when we have an angle of 45° with a radius, we are able to go backwards and set ourselves the conditions
We know that the radius, of some length, has a definition height and a definite width
how do we get the height and width
The height, we know as the Y; the width, the X
Because think about the X, Y graph
X goes left to right, Y goes bottom to top
Width; height
This is, of course, conceptual
But you might realize that every line segment has a definition X-width and Y-height
The radius, being a line segment, is characterized (internally) as having width X and height Y
When we draw that out, we get a right triangle
Hence this drawing
Yes
So that is where we get the triangle
Now because of this internal characterization
We can "dissect" it and look at it from all parts
We know that the radius has some value of Y
And some value of X
These X and Y values are, as previously mentioned, ascribed to their respective angle
In order to get these, we have to look back at which trig functions have X an Y in them, given these conditions
sin(θ) = Y/R by trigonometric definition (radius height/radius length)
cos(θ) = X/R by trigonometric definition (radius width/radius length)
So where is it internally? It's built innately, by geometry
But now we gotta get rid of the R's in the denominator. Which is easy: just multiply by R
Rsin(θ) = (RY)/R = Y
Rcos(θ) = (XY)/R = X
The real definition of these trig functions is the ratio of innate lengths should the angle be a part of a right triangle with unit (length of 1) hypotenuse.
Which answers your question about the ratio being the "definition" of cosine. It is the mathematical definition. But it's multivariable.
The beginning of this, we set out to determine an x,y point knowing only a radius and an angle.
In your demonstration of doing this, you have just stipulated a given x,y coordinate and then appealed to the sin/cosine functions to explain how we get them
when I'm still lost on how sin cosine get us it with only the angle and raidus information
just feels like an infinite regression
It's built within the innate characteristics of sine and cosine
For whatever how the Greeks determine it. That's beyond my ken
And rather, unimportant
I'm sure someone with a degree can explain the origins of it
Well yeah, you do have a given (x, y), but it's not readily defined
It's at the end of your vector
You just don't know what (x, y) is, but you know it's there
Which is why they remain in variable form
These are good questions, ngl. And perhaps your teacher can explain it better.
It's best to understand that the Greeks had this pre-set determination that for any right triangle with a definite width and definite height and a hypotenuse that connects the two will always form a definite angle.
They characterized this definite triangle by its definite height, Y, and definite width, X, on the XY plane
For every "X" and "Y", whatever they may be, they found out that those with the same ratios formed the same angle
Which is why it's innate
The (x, y), apart from being the tail of your vector, has been defined into the very conceptual definition of cosine and sine
However, this also means that the radius length (hypotenuse) is definitely defined
---- so here's your answer: ---
In your case, it is 5
And it's hoisted at a 45° angle
So it will have some definite width and some definite height to it, by the converse of the layman Greek trigonometric definitions.
We know that the sine is height/length (opposite/hypotenuse), but perhaps we can manipulate that to our benefit without changing the definition
sin(θ) = Y/R
And if you do simple algebra and wanna isolate Y:
Rsin(θ) = Y
@alpine sable does this make more sense
TL;DR the Greeks were so fucking smart that they found out that any definite right triangle with the same side length ratios will have the angle, and vise versa
I can't wait for the other two guys who were here to show up and be like "bro what the fuck"
@alpine sable Has your question been resolved?
A little bit yeah, I need to study it more. Thanks for your help
Closed by @pseudo wadi
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello i need help knowing if i’m doing this correctly or not, i’m so lost
the initial approach is valid though a bit inefficient
what do you have after dividing both sides of
-4k < 0
by -4
and how did that lead to k=0
would it be k<0
yes
if k > 0, there will be no real solutions
and it seems they only want 1 such value
also this conclusion would be quite intuitive from simply subtracting k from both sides of the initial equation to get
(x+3)^2 = -k
so can i choose any integer greater than 0 as the answer?
based on the wording of the question, yes
okay, thank you!
@woeful dock Has your question been resolved?
yes
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i convert (x-1)/(2-x)=2x+1 into ax^2 + bx + c = 0 form?
alright so (x-1)/(2-x) x (2-x) = 2x+1(2-x)?
Need parentheses, but sure
- (2-x^2)/(2-x) = x+2?
how are you getting that
online calculator although maybe i put it in wrong
yeah i definitely put it in wrong im not sure the correct way to input it
the correct way is don't
and do it yourself by hand
rhs = -2x^2+3x+2 im not sure how to do the lhs by hand
consider why you're even multiply both sides by (2-x)
hold up its x-1
to get rid of the fraction right?
yes
Closed by @spring jackal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does it always works?
I know if I assume alpha=45 and beta =35 then the equation is works
But I’m not sure if it’s work if the value of alpha, beta changes
And I can’t seem to figure it out myself
let alpha = beta
yea it don work
Ohh if the equation works under those 3 circumstances 1.alpha>beta, 2.alpha<beta, 3.alpha=beta
Then it’s always works I guess
Could you explain why
wait are you trying to find sols to this eqn?
or are you trying to prove that it works
oh wait nvm i reread ur question
$\frac{1}{tan(\alpha - \beta)} = \frac{\cos(\alpha - \beta)}{\sin(\alpha - \beta)}$
JamesH
when $\alpha = \beta$, this is undefined
JamesH
“Undefined” I’m not sure what does it mean in math
if you expand using angle sum formulae you'll see that it doesn't always work
JamesH
Closed by @cinder sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
given that tan(alpha)+tan(beta)=5/2, tan(alpha)tan(beta)=3/2.
0<alpha<beta<90degree, then the question asks for tan(alpha-beta)
i have no idea about this one
let u = tan(alpha) and v = tan(beta), then you're given u+v=5/2 and uv=3/2
i suggest you rewrite as sines and cosines
so u and v are the solutions of of 2x^2 - 5x + 3 = 0
oh also this
yes, ure right
this way you will get tan(alpha) and tan(beta) individually and you can use the angle difference formula for tan to get what you want
@cinder sundial Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
saw a comment in a youtube video which made me wonder,
I mean the floor function seems to create 1 wide rectangles
Yes, they have the same value (infinity).
Closed by @lament glen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.