#help-0
1 messages · Page 853 of 1
I just took 3/4 inside the bracket
i mean
if it was me
id probably just use repeated chain rules
this.
log differentiation is useful but i never use it lol
lol
Is this regular convex or irregular convex?
pacman
lol
amazing
So, finally you should end up with \ $\frac{1}{3}\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{3}{4}\left(x-\frac{2}{3}\right)\right)+C$
Euclid31415
Some kind of identity?
how do the fancy thing
Euclid u know?
i guess it’s just a reciprocal
Its just another trig substitution but x=atan(u)
u is?
Another variable
Its just latex
o
But this is so widely used, we consider it one of the "standard" forms
is a a constant
I mean not really by the way, just looks like sub
i just wanted to know where this proof is wrong
@carmine lion sqrt(x^2) is absolute value
$:\sqrt{\left(4-\frac{9}{2}\right)^2}+\frac{9}{2}$ evaluate this
eggdog
it’s not equal to x
I like you pfp 👌
Thanks G
ty mate
sqrt((4-4.5)^2) = 0.5, not -0.5
Yep
basically what i just said lol
abe
yeah
exactly
because of:
if x = 5 the root could be both -5 and 5
$\left|x\right|=-x\quad :\quad x\le :0$
eggdog
probably actually x<0
true yea
nvm
it gave the condition looks like
if x>0 , |x| =x?
yea
or well I guess if you said this
you would have to include 0
yeah
but that brings up a debate about whether 0 is positive or negative
absolute value of 0 is 0 though
-0 moment

yeah
mhm
Does not exist
is this channel free
new to discord hm
my gosh
I'm not sure why this is true
is this a matrix
I feel dumb
Bro it is kinda trivial
ok
then help the dude don’t condescend wtf
What do you get if you put r+1 in place of i inLHS?
Well it looks like they replaced I with r + 1
Ye
oh yeah
is it because they increase the upper limit of the summation
by one
So you need to add that one extra term
they increase the upper limit of the summation so you need to add when its equal to r+1
that was confusing
set i to r+1
ok ya that makes sense idk why I didn't get that
Its just in this format. \$\sum_{i=0}^{k+1} a_i=\sum_{i=0}^k a_i +a_{k+1}$
Euclid31415
was staring at it for like 10 minutes
right right
one more q: I'm kinda bad at this summation stuff
if I had a sum from I = 0 to n
if there's a n in the summation
can I just take it out
Take it out of the summation
Yeah if its in some removable state like multiplication
like make it sigma(i=0, n-1) + n?
could i get some help with this please
$\sum_{i=0}^n n\cdot a_i=n\sum_{i=0}^{n}a_i$
Euclid31415
oh thats what you meant
thought you couldn't do it if it wasn't a constant
distribute
but n is a constant
you can pull out anything constant wrt the summation index
$\sum_{i=1}^n f(n)g(i)=f(n)\sum_{i=1}^ng(i)$
Mosh
:)
if m = 5; (6, -1)
then it'd be (7, 4)(6, -1) right?
so m = 3/5; (2, -4)
would (7, -1)(2, -4) be correct?
bruh
but whats the question
again
i saw 2 numbers inside a bracket
that still isnt a question
what are the entire instructions
...
a point?
slope point means the line has some slope and goes through this point
a point doesnt have a slope
empathsis on the singularity of point
you mean the x and y intercepts right?
"point slope formula" is $y-y_1=m(x-x_1)$ for slope m and point $(x_0,y_0)$
Mosh
I'm told to map two points on a graph using a slope and a point. But i'm given only one point and a slope
i believe so
Oh lwt me try that out
i don't get it
remember, slope just means how many y units it goes up for every x it goes right
...kinda like this?
pardons for the blurry pic
so the points i got here are correcg right?
the format for a point is (x,y)
y is up and down
x is right and left
your points are right
glorious! thank you :))
math learning moments are fun because the only teachers i have right now are online folks; fun as f2f teachers
mhm
math is more of a natural thing
it describes things in real life
its just that some people don't make that clear :)
ah! i see
farewell :)
:)
thank you again
yw
how do i solve for this
21000=A(1+0.06/365)^-365(4)
when i solve for A i get like
0.99 or something
which doesnt make sense
thank you
you might be plugging in the wrong numbers.
i got a different answer when i plugged everything into my calculator.
alright
let me replug in
so waht im going to plug in rn is
or
thats the setup right
use your initial formula
ok sec
p=a(1+r/m)^-m(t)
how do i get the slope
yep
yep!
it can't.
so actually you found each variable.
Any help here? I figured that AB = 6x - 50, although that isn't the answer. I used the quadratic formula but I got different values for x.
sec
uhh
P is what you get
like P is final $$$
A is initial
wait no A is final
and P is initila we aretryihng to fin d intiial
yeah, but for some reason the equation given to you is written wrong and when I plugged everything in i got 16,519.51
do you have multiple tries on the answer?
so the equation that is written on the hw says p=a(1+r/m)^-mt
so if we don't know p, plug in the numbers you already have
alright
p=21000(1+0.06/365)^-365(4)
oh
and tahts the right answer
wtf
wait im so confused
what is this problem asking me and waht is it related to the equation? wtf
i dont understand hm
so, you were finding interest. however, this equation was set up different b/c the ^(-mt)
lol tbh i was confused too for a second.
wait im so confused
so this equation is to find compound interest
after 4 years
bruh im confused
given me one second im looking into another equation
ahhh, okay so you are finding the initial amount, because -365 days times 4 years would help find the amount deposited in the beginning. does that help?
and r/n is the percentage rate/the duration (365days)
if that doesn't help maybe we could get on a chat.
That equation in the problem for compound interest was to find the value in the past. The negative sign makes it go back in time. Normally the equation is positive exponent
I was using Photomath because I was stuck on something and on this step, it tells me to change the signs on both sides of the equation but I don’t know why I have to do that. Could someone explain?
oh i see alright thank you
it helps thanks sm
bruh
channel is in use
subtract 3 from both sides
then multiply by 2.9 on both sides
thanks
how?
@rocky quest first of all that’s a quiz, second of all the people before you haven’t gotten there questions answered
nvm.... 😦
ok ok ty
@craggy niche i can’t help you without giving the answer, and that’s pretty basic stuff so if you’re doing derivatives you should know that
whats the next step?
If f(1) = 10 and f(n) = -2f(n-1) then find the value of f(5)
divide by 15
Don't interrupt a channel that is being used
8 right?
<#
dldh06 gave some advice, got it right. Cheerrs
guys what method do i need to make 2/7 into decimal without calculator
dldh06
Long division, by hand
@wary stream ty
so 8^-2?
Yes
Divide
what is the next step
makes no sense
im about to rip my hair out its so frustrating
Do you not know how to use basic algebra concepts? Get all the terms with a variable on one side, everything else on the other
This might help: the statement f(n) = -2f(n-1) really ought to be written as: "for every positive integer n, f(n) = -2f(n-1)."
Then just try to read it like an English sentence and understand what that is saying
Don't do anything until you've understood the meaning of the sentence
i understand what it means
could you say it in your own words?
wdym by that
Translate for every positive integer n, f(n) = -2f(n-1). to the kind of English you understand
this is so frustrating i cant even think
It's expected to take some time if it's your first time reading math (properly)
But I promise you everything you need to know how to solve the problem is actually contained in that sentence
Wdym by that
You just have to dig the meaning from it
Dig?
Oh I wasn't responding to you @azure smelt
woops
i dont speak math language
um could u help tho?
pls
I suckkkkkk at math
Yep, that's normal. But the good thing about math language is that it's grammatically just English
Well no
If you understand the abbreviations
so let's walk through it
f(n) means "the value of f at n"
= means "is" (in particular, not "calculate")
-2 is -2
and f(n-1) is "the value of f at n-1"
mhm
so if you write it all out, you'd get:
"For every positive integer n, the value of f at n is -2 times the value of f at n-1."
Now the "for every positive integer n" is important
What do you think it's trying to say there?
The positive integers are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... btw
for every positive integer, multiply it by n?
Nope!
hmm
every positive integer is n?
Nope
So the real deal is this
If I said "every positive integer is positive" (kind of a tautology)
You'd have no problem understanding that right?
I understand that
Let's get gradually more complicated
its like -2 is -2
"Every positive integer plus itself is equal to twice itself"
Does that sentence make sense?
yes
Notice how I said "itself" many times
It gets quickly unwieldly for more complicated relationships
Yep
So we introduce a variable name
to name the "positive integer"
So let's write more succintly
"For every positive integer n, n+n = 2n"
I just rewrote "Every positive integer plus itself is equal to twice itself," no tricks involved
Do you mean n is 1?
Yes
Why did you say that?
because you said n+n is 2n, and isnt every positive integer plus itself twice itself?
Yep
In fact, you aren't even supposed to solve that equation
so if n+n = 10
Just read it
then n+n = 5+5
so let's step back
because adding a positive integer to itself is two times more
All I did was write the sentence "Every positive integer plus itself is equal to twice itself"
in a more efficient way
No more, no less
I didn't turn it into a problem
I just wrote it as a math sentence
yes
"For every positive integer n, n+n = 2n"
Understand how that means the same thing as the longer version
The role of n here isn't something to solve for
It's just a name
Just like you give people names
I gave the positive integer a name
the 'n+n = 2n' is again a part of the sentence, it says "n plus n is 2n"
(there is no "solve" or anything like that)
I gave it a name n, so I can call it n
yes
So that's what "for every positive integer n" should be read as
-> "For every positive integer... (and I'm calling it n)"
mhm
So back to:
for every positive integer n, f(n) = -2f(n-1).
This is gonna translate to:
"f at every positive integer input is equal to -2 times f evaluated at 1 less than that positive integer" (this is pretty unwieldly to write out)
That's the whole point of introducing algebra and math notation
Yes!
which equals -3f(1)
Indeed
and then -3(2)
Yep
so the answer for f(2) is -6
If I were to say what it basically is, it's reading comprehension :)
See, speaking math isn't that hard!
Just gotta think it through
can u help me please
I Hate Statistical Analysis
@azure smelt What does cumulative frequency even mean?
U don't know or are u asking me?
I feel like if you recall the definition, you'll immediately know from reading it how to find p
Half and half 😛
What
did I say something confusing?
Those don't sound like workable definitions at all
There should be precise definitions for what those terms mean
Bruh
I'm not saying that like I'm surprised
I know for a fact either your teacher or textbook
has the precise definitions
in your notes or in the textbook
You just have to find them
can you repost the pic
I don't know what IB is
But how do I find the relationship>
you need to find p
Isn't that the whole point in this>
what relationship?
Between the frequencies>
This is kind of a weird data set, can x only take on the values {5, 15, 25, 35, 45, ...}?
Right?
(side question)
It's a really odd dataset. I'd assume so because then the c. Freq would rely on how many values you choose... unless that's what it's supposed to be?
Indeed, if x could be any positive integer, then cumulative frequency would not even be determinable from the frequency column
you're only working with what given
?
lol
.
with p completing the frequency, you can find mean
and variance
wat class/year is this for?
Ok I figured out what cumulative frequency likely actually means in this context
Frequency of x is just $#{y\in\text{ your data set }\colon y=x}$
Icy001
and cumulative frequency of x is just $#{y\in\text{your data set}:y\leq x}$
Icy001
And the assumption is the data set only contains values 5, 15, 25, 35, and 45
How do I find the ordered pairs?
@azure smelt hope that helps, I gave you the likely precise definitions
wdym
Already getting help
aight
need a little help on this problem in finding T
so what i have so far
is 18000=15000(1+0.05/12)^12(t)
6/5=(1+0.05/12)^12(t)
and im not sure where to go from here
do i do -1?
huh
did u look up log power rule
yea
Yeah what u have is right
This
Yes
-.05 and
Isolate the t and plug into calculator
Subtract?
Just leave it as is
ok
calculator wil solve for t?
6/5=(1+0.05/12)^12(t)
[log(6/5)]/[12log(1+.05/12)]= t
yeah same thing
3.65402
ye
so hit it with the log when you need to solve for a power
Then you just solve for t
alright
just remember to do it for both sides
ln(x^y) = ylnx, ln(xy) = lnx+lny, ln(x/y) = lnx-lny
those are log rules
yeah
yea that first ones powerrule
Memorize this shi
after that im stuck on this i dont even know how to get started is it I=prt?
how can i compute this?
you can factor that out like
wait can you
x+9 x-3
yea that works
your zeros are 9,3
that can also be simplified to -3rt-72 or whatever
im not sure if rt-72 is possible
-9?
oh
Can any1 tell me why I'm not getting -1 as an answer here? 
d(b^3)/dx=0?
should be 1*-3+-1*4 for your dot products.
nope. denominator is fine.
alr coo
Find three cubic spline functions that pass through the four points (1, 5), (2, 6), (3, 2) and (6, 1) with the second derivatives = 0, at the two endpoints.
Anyone can help me with that?
thanks
@knotty sage are you sure you didn't misstate anything there?
why?
...oh wait, cubic splines...
yep
not just a single cubic function interpolating all of this at once
do u know how to do that?
have you made any progress on this btw
i have an idea in mind but idk if you already arrived at it yourself
i have not
make the interpolating function linear on [1,2] and [3,6], then make a cubic interpolating function on [2,3] with first derivatives at 2 and 3 matching those of the linear pieces
Hi. How to find complex solutions for D and E in this expression: $$-p - 1 = Dp - 2D - 3Di + Ep - 2E + 3Ei$$ ?
OleG
how can i do that?
How can I solve this for x, other than graphing?
$$\frac{1}{x}\hspace{1mm} cosh \left(285x \right) - \frac{1}{x} = 74$$
hduxueiwkwnxudi
its a transcendental equation so theres probably not any other way
oh
i mean you could kinda write it in terms of exponentials and fractions, and then try to simplify it somehow so that we can use lambert w function here
but i cant really see how
probably used series to solve and approximate answers 🤷♂️
i was going to post this but then someone else just had to jump in
sorry what should i do next?
you could do one of several different things but it's all going to boil down to solving a system of linear equations where the unknowns are constant coefficients characterizing your middle cubic in some way
you could for example write y' = (11 - 4x)/3 + a(x-2)(x-3) where a is an unknown constant, integrate that, get another constant, then set y(2) to 6 and y(3) to 2 to get a system in a and c and solve for those
(11-4x)/3 is the linear function that interpolates between (2, 1) and (3, -1/3)
hey! can anyone do these two?
You can use the truth table I think
can someone help me pls. question:The sum of the first 105 numbers in Pascal's Triangle
Since both statements B and D is true , the truth value would be
B ^ D = T ^ T = T
I guess
You have to identify first if the given statements is true or false
After that, rely on truth tables so you can get its truth value
Or if there's no given truth table, then make one
what happens to the J tho?
thats the thing i have no idea how and i cant understand it
Ohh I thought I saw and statement
So it's a conditional one
Anyways, it's still the same
idk it's a conjunction
You just have to know if the statement is true or false, then use a truth table
Unfortunately, I can't help you with making a truth table. However, there are youtube videos out there that will explain it better than I do
Since the statements you used in your compound statement is true, then the value of it would be true
If you wrote if vaccination rates are NOT increasing, then B would be false
Since that would be the opposite of your simple statement B
The truth value would still be true
Since the single statements are true but you negated them all your statements, it would still be true. Truth table would look something like
H P ~H ~P (~H^~P)
T T F F T
Or wait
Here
I'm struggling
What am I supposed to put in this box
and why am I supposed to put it there?
@vale wigeon is it like that?
some help plz
well, you can start by expanding cos(3theta)
im not sure how to do that
these are the identities i have
could you treat it as if it's cos(2x+x)?
yes
wwhat is i was to have cos4x @toxic zephyr
for what values of x is this undefined
cos3x+x?
that works but maybe cos(2(2x)) would be better
depends on the situation
It this chat free?
This chat free?
Anyone can help?
Been solving it for an hour
I cant get it right
Take cases to get rid of modulus
What is your progress
I separated them with 2 possible cases
X-7 / X+ 2 < (x-3)
X-7 / X+ 2 < (-(x-3))
Am i correct?
Ok
This channel is occupied
For this, \$\frac{x-7}{x+2}-(x-3)<0\implies \frac{x-7-(x+2)(x-3)}{x+2}<0$
Euclid31415
Yeah thats what i did then?
The numerator turns into -(x-1)^2
God dam it go another channel please
I need to compare them and I need to use the words mean, median and mode and skew
Bruhhh!!!!

dm me
do you know what those terms mean
then just compare them for each graph?
I dont know how to find these terms in the graph
go to sleep kid
not everyone is in the same country
Exactly
oh
how do you find the mean
You add all the data together and divide it by how many data is collected
so, do that
Ok
Can someone help me here?
We have $X_i \sim N(\mu, \sigma^2)$ we want to get rid of the $\mu$ thus we can rewrite it as $X_i - \mu \sim N(0, \sigma^2)$. How is this possible; how does this work? How is this called?
faraday
<@&268886789983436800> .
Memes in question 0 and also in other channels.
and what do you expect us to do? ban on the spot for posting an inoffensive meme in the wrong place?
Why is the center point 2/3 as far away from (0,0) than $(a+b/2, c/2)$
Senku Ishigami
Delete the post and tell them not to.
the former isnt really necessary and the latter can be done by you.
lmao
Is this equal to zero?
why are you still on about this?
Ask the mods? tf you mean. drop this whole thing and ignore it. no reason for you to still be babbling on about this
Well sure.
If you ask a question, everyone ignores it and then some person comes and pings you to joke with the question.
I guess you would feel really good.
Leave it.
,w y = 5x + 1
You can use the quadratic formula from here
<@&268886789983436800> @summer yacht keeps spamminf people with this nonsense answer and won't stop after being asked to
Mods have logs
Don't be dumb
Yeah
i'll mute you for a while as a warning @summer yacht . repeated offenses will escalate.
Can anyone do this and give me the working
anyone there
sam can walk 2.1 m in 30 mins , find the time taken for 5.6 km
2.1 mile = 3.37 km
how do i solve this
#❓how-to-get-help read rules
if I have a summation over index C and C= A+ B then is the summation over index C = Summation over index A * summation over index B ?
Use TAN relation. eg: TANA=p/b
help
@alpine sable substitute -3 into the equation
so y = -2(-3)-3
=3
and then do that for the rest of the x values
don't ask to ask
don't say help waiting for someone to say post your question for you to post it, post it directly
Help plz

I have a class soon plz ASAP
Hello
I'm a student from class 8
and I have problems in linear equations containing fractions in them
Would you like some help with them?
HELP
Yes
I would please
O actually don't know how to solve them
If one is given in fronna me
Could I see the problems?
Sure
multiply the second equation on 13 by 2
then add both equations together
x is isolated now
Okay

In 14, you could multiply second equation by -10 to isolate Y
Not sure if there’s easier way, it’s been a while since I’ve done elim lol
Is this channel open?

It’s been a while since I’ve done problems like that but they seem right to me
But why
I just copied the answers from the board and don’t understand why
I see no correlation
I wish I remembered bio enough to be super helpful but I’m not sure what I can do
is this channel open?
Umm
Does anyone know population environmental science
Growth curves
More of a math than science unit
populations of animals grow logarithmically, meaning they eventually reach a population cap, whereas things like bacteria and other unicellular organisms grow exponentially
not sure the limits to bacteria growth though
I know that bugs also grow exponentially
And spiders
And R- selected species
But the thing is
Why are the fleas considered logistic
Because arnt fleas an insect
And don’t they give minimal care to their young
no idea, i don't know anything about environmental studies
Alright np. I guess this is a math server anyways. @mellow dome channel open
how do i solve 2^-4?
its the same as $\frac{1}{2^4}$
wut]
Ladan
so the minus trnaslates to /whatever the equasion is without a minus
yup thats it^^
could someone explain why its 9/2x and not 9/2xy
I could take a crack at it
Never mind, I found out it had a simple formula
someone please help my math homework is due in 15 minutes and i dont know how to solve this one question. it goes “there’s line AB, construct point C so that AC:CB=2:3”
nvm y’all false alarm my homegirl got me
homegirl a real onε
gg homegirl
periodt
Ye but I only just started the topic and I’ve tried googling it can’t get like a clear answer
Like idk how to explain that in a summary
Keep in mind the actual instructions are to research yourself
Oh
Yeah, they're just trying to be lazy
i know what the teacher wants now
I am trying to be lazy
In this section we start off with the motivation for definite integrals and give one of the interpretations of definite integrals. We will be approximating the amount of area that lies between a function and the x-axis. As we will see in the next section this problem will lead us to the definition of the definite integral and will be one of th...
read this
Bcos that’s what this server is for
it isnt
and go to the next page and read it
maybe he/she just wants you to describe the idea of infinite sums
almost like you could've googled that yourself
lol
Shut it mosh
I have been it’s not easy to get a good website
You and your anime profile pic
bruh
3b1b's video on the topic, any derivation of definite integrals via riemann sums
ono
like how when there are more and more rectangles the integral more closely approximates the area under the curve
just googling "How is area under a curve and an integral related?"
yes 3b1b is cool
Just google “how to go outside”
Like I just googled it and got a stack exchange post
@rich silo chill bro
Hope you’re proud to have the “very active” role on a discord buddy
you found your website now go research

