#help-0
1 messages · Page 808 of 1
so what would the limit be when x-> -inf?
exactly
ty so much ur a life saver
No worries, anytime
wait but also, a follow up question
um
wouldn't the denominator be negative as well?
if its x approaches -infinity
x already is negative, the sign is inside x as well
in a sec, this channel is occupied
so in the denominator, when you divide by x, you are dividing with a negative number and the sign of x is there
x could be -4, -100, it doesn't matter, we still write +x
the problem was the square root function
we can't put negative values in it, since the square root of a negative number is ill-defined
so instead, we opt out to represent x as -|x|, which as an example would be x=-5, x=-|x| means -5 = -|-5| = -|5|
i understand the part in the numerator
from my understanding this is how the function would play out
so wouldnt the negatives cancel out
oh i kinda get it
I think you should play around with numbers and see what happens, maybe that would help
so when im appraoching any limit problem where x is approaching negative infinity
should i treat the x as a negative number?
or
i know im missing something here
Yes, however -x doesn't mean the value -x is negative
because x could be negative itself, as i mentioned here ^^^
so positive numbers are |x| and negative are -|x|
that is the best you could do
great, if you have further question just ping me
for sure
yeah, channel is now free
marc
Check whether the channel is occupied or not before posting 🙂
my bad.
Number theory is my greatest weakness, though I can do some googling and maybe see if that is true
in order to not spoil the solution that is
This should be correct, the gap between primes can be shown to be arbitrarily large
consecutive primes*
do you want a hint?
You need to consider a sequence of integers (or rather find a construction) so that the number between the primes are composite (hint: use the factorial)
yeah, perhaps another way to do it, consider finding N consecutive numbers that are composite
yeah, since from that sequence you are guaranteed to have a smaller number that is going to be a prime, as well as a larger one making the gap larger than N
yeah, how would consecutive numbers with the factorial look?
im having problems with this
can you algebraically write a few out?
Occupied, please find a different channel
if I tell you it's a major spoiler
maybe work with those hints for a little bit, if you get stuck for like 10-15 minutes you can ask me again
since it is a wonderful problem
so 1) use the factorial function to 2) construct a sequence of N composite numbers
I should be online
you can also DM me in order to not keep this channel occupied
yw
Hey guys can someone help me, I just cant get to the matrix from the answer
I just dont get it, why the second row from the matrix T_B is influenced by T_A and not both
Cause one of the columns in T_A is 1 0
So when you do the multiplication, it'll just keep that column from B the same
How does the composition work? If i remember correctly, u have to use T_A first and then use the outcome in T_B?
Yeah you do, but the composition of transformations is the multiplication of their matrices
do we know the size of T_A ? e.g R^3x3 ?
Yes, A is an operator on R^2, so it's 2x2
as u mentioned before that one column is 1 0 , then the second column should be 0 1 right, since they are both standard vectors for 2x2?
okay
2nd is where (0,1) maps
could be give me a simple example i cant follow after "2nd is where.."
or could u recommend me a good video about that topic
(0,1) clearly maps to (0,-3) under A
yes
So the 2nd column is (0,-3)
thats it?
Yes.
lol i knew that but i thought u meant something more complicated
im sorry for being dumb
Nope
thank you very much, i think i got it
Does there exist $n \in \bN s.t. (d\cdot n + c)|(a\cdot n + b) ; \forall a,b,c,d \in \bN$
Yes...
TC159
Your question makes no sense
d > a and c > b
Still doesn't make sense
Duh doy smart guy I said It wasn't in that exact form
give me a sec
$\exists m \in \bN ; s.t. ;(m \cdot (2k-1) - (k-1)) | (m \cdot n + k-1) \forall n,k \in \bN$
TC159
n such that n geq 2k - 1
Help me 1+1x0=?
I say 1 but my teacher say 0
@tiny minnow "operator precedence" is they keyword, multplication before addition, so 1+(bllah*0) = 1+(0) = 1
are u for real?
yeah that why
Did you forget including parantheses somewhere?
no way ur teacher said its 0
Coz (1+1)x0 is sth different
And old calculator which do one operation at a time (like the one in google for example) do not respect pemdas
LOL i trick my teacher:/
?
Can someone explain how step 2 got to step 3 thanks
Hes typo
So many typos in this textbook ;-;
It meant (a-4)(a+2)
a^a-2a-8 = (a-4)(a+2)
Okay thanks

If I have three Points A = (4 4) , B= (2 4) and M= (3 -10), how can i calculate the distance between M and the straight line that goes through A and B ?

Good question
Classic
You can do a simple sketch to help you
Take notice that there isn’t such a thing as the distance between a point and a straight line
A straight line is a set of points
So you can draw a line joining the point with any other point in the line to find its distance
But the thing is
We are said to find the “shortest” distance between a point and a line
the distance will change depending in the point i choose right
That’s probably what your question asks
I just wanted to give you a heads up to this point
thats the thing it just says , the distance nothing more or less
Yeah so it actually means the shortest distance
Am I youngest here?
The teacher omitted it because it is “obvious”
I am 11
Yes
You have to be 13+ to use discord delete
alright, i will see, thanks mate
jk lol
Thanks what?
I didn’t help you yet?
You know how to find this shortest distance?
no 11 can algebra:/
between any point and shortest distance is already a help
execpt math guy
Wait wait
I think a misunderstanding happened?
what happended?
I mean that what you have to find is the shortest distance from the point to the straight line
That’s what your question actually wants
yes thought the same
But you can’t choose any point on the straight line
Not all will give you the shortesy distance
There is a certain point
So the thing is
alright im listening now it gets interesting
What you use is that the shortest distance is the perpendicular distance
You can draw a sketch to make sense of this
You see that?
just looking it up
You mean googling? Don’t do that just draw a sketch
alright did
So what you have to do is
Find the equation of this line
This line has a gradient perpendicular to the line AB and passes through point M
Using those information you can construct the equation
After that make the red line intersect with AB and find the point of intersection
Now the shortest distance is the distance from your M to the point of intersection
hold on give my brain a minute to follow up
Using distance formula
Ok
can i use this formula?
You can point out to your teacher that they didn’t include the “shortest” in the question 😉 if they are easy and won’t get mad at doing so
Where did you find this?
internet
Internet is bad
thats true
We can’t just use formulas from the internet
sometime u find sth good though
@empty sparrow not Recommend
This formula is true but you can’t just “use” it
It’s not inside your tool box
Your teacher wants you to work through all the steps to reach your required
Its to hard for simple question
i mean its an online task, so they just want the answer
if u relly-relly maxed make 1;1 scale
i dont think that he wants to see the actual way
That would be considered cheating in some sense
🙃
Like entering a paintball fight with a tank
You won’t learn if you use ready formulas
Yeah
You as a person doing math is the one supposed to come up with the formulas
So you should do it in steps and reach the answer using your math skills
alright ZossDude, i will try it out without using given formulas from the internet , if i dont succeed will message u again 🤝
if u want use formula u must know where its from
now better?
ZossDude 🤣 yes that’s good
🤝
Okay good luck!
Thanks!
That’s not my point. I’m saying you can’t use sth your teacher didn’t “allow” you to use
yes
Wlc
Zozz how old are u
Young
Is there a faster way to calculate this besides using partial fraction decomposition ?
what's x+1 - (x-1)
well it'll be (x^2-1)^4 but I quess it won't reduce to a mucc more simpler form
12 th grade
I Cant
Why ?
Well then I'm up for it
come on vc
I understand how linear transformations and the determinant works but idk for the adjugate.
@alpine sableThe determinant of a square matrix is a single number that, among other things, can be related to the area or volume of a region. In particular, the determinant of a matrix reflects how the linear transformation associated with the matrix can scale or reflect objects.
That i can help
Anybody know ?
Can take better pic?
4,5
x = 3
y = 2
oh thx
and change to 3/2
i must
help to solve questions
but they are way too hard
because im only at grade 8..
logʸ x = 3 logʸ² x³ @tiny minnow
for future
solve
Not 100%
ah
so
9x - 7i > 9x - 21u
from this we know that 7i < 21u
very thanks @tiny minnow
@alpine sable nope
divided by 7
LOL

i < u means i luv u tho
so...
frick.
but
u multiply 5/6 x (-18/25)?
how does 5/6 relate to -25/18
and then simplify
@tiny minnow
oohh ok thx
what?
divide*
5/6 x 18/-25 = 90/-150 = 3/-5
Btw $$\frac{1}{2}$$
\frac{}{}
no
thats only test
dont be awkward
Also, test it in #latex-testing
ok
WHO PINGED?
Absolutely UNACCEPTABLE! I cannot begin to comprehend why you just pinged me on the Discord app. It seems the divide between you and I (on intellectual levels) is greater than I could have ever imagined. While I was busy creating the next big thing, you and your underdeveloped brain decided to humor me with “comedy gold,” as others have said recently. Well, you certainly have failed to humor me — in fact, you have actually made me quite upset. It is for that I applaud you, I truly do. You may have just been the first of the cesspool of commoners to finally pique my attention, the first whose utter retardation has finally caught the interest of a higher being. Well, I’m listening. What is it today, “Funnyman?” Is it another mediocre meme? Another “le epic copypasta?” This is the first and last time I acknowledge a Funnyman. In fact, this is the last time any Funnyman will be acknowledged. Image permissions will be removed starting immediately, and a one minute slow mode is being enacted in that very moment. You’ve done God’s work, Funnyman. You finally broke the last straw and ruined it for everyone else. I grow gleeful at just the thought of you writhing in pain the next time you go to shitpost, realizing quickly that this liberty is no more; know it is not a liberty, it is an act of insubordination, treason, terrorism.
actually
can you chill a bit
ping isnt that bad
and it is allowed
I feel like you typed this in the wrong server because I don't think anyone pinged you, except for these recent replies
This is the question, I have no way to prove that the exam is over. Maybe answer tomorrow
(1/10 - 3/2) ^2
7/5
(-7/5)^2
Can yall just help me with that? I swear the exam is over
Its nagging me constantly
just find 3^(100) mod 11 and you should be done
how do i approach 2iv? am i correct to just take all the points in S2 to form a homogeneous linear system and subsequently solve for p,q,r,s?
I got p = 0, q = -s, s= s, r= s. how should i proceed?
I'm not even mad, this is just funny.
should be 2*4 + 5 = 13
x^3 increases faster than x^2 so it should converge to zero
Which part
Whole part
That very weird because I put 0 and it says it was wrong
I forgot this whole part
didn mean to interupt sorry
Its quadratic equation
So what did u put for part 1
weird, maybe i am missing something but this looks quite simple actually. dont really now what else it would be
The question is on the right side
If the width is x and the length is 3 longer than the width, then the length is 3 longer than x. So how would u express the length
Multiplying?
Ahh 3m:)
Practicing for my ged and i’m trying to figure out what type of math is this?
so what would that be
how 7
If two lines are perpendicular to the same plane, they are
(1) Congruent
(2) Perpendicular
(3) Coplanar
(4)Skew
Someone help
area = length x width. IN this case the length is x+3 and the width is 3
so what would are be equal to
ye
And then?
now u can rearrange it into standard quadratic equation
x²+3x -28=0 ?
Do you know the discriminant formula?
you never need it, but it's an easy what out of any quadratic equation
Ahh okay and then?
when you got something like x² - ax + b, the 2 solutions (if they exists) have their sum making a and their product making b
(x+7)(x-4)=0 like this?
ye thats right
so now we can use the fact that for two factors product to be 0, one of the factors must be 0
so eitehr x+7 or x-4 can be 0
for the equation to be satisfied
so now just find the two values of x
no
Ohh
no ur going backwards
(x+7)(x-4)=0
for this equation to be true either x+7 or x-4 has to be 0
I don't get it
Aka zero product property
if two factors products is equal to 0 then at least one of the products must be 0
shit i
i mean on of the factors must be 0
think about it like x*y=0
if x is 0 the equation is true
and if y is 0 its also true
So x+7 must be zero
Or?
thats one solution
x-4
Ahh i get it
Then question 3
what values of x did u get
3
how 3?
ur two solutions are
x+7=0
and
x-4=0
so just rearrange them to make x the subject
and thats ur two solutions
aka find x
x=7 and x=4?
So thats the answer of number 3
almost
remember its lengths
so x=-7m or x=4m
in the context of length
-7m doesnt make sense
so we can disregard that solution
so that just leaves us with x=4
not quite that gives the width only
the width is x and the length is x+3m
so u can sub x in
width
Also known as extraneous solution, I believe. Correct me if I’m wrong
im not really familiar with fancy terms xd sorry
Didn’t mean to ping you, message was too far back so had to ping reply for the context
ye this is right also i googled it
No, not free
so have u got ur length and width?
u know the width is x cos it tells u
and the length is x+3
but now we know the value of x
so we can replace it with a number
What number
Ahh
its the same variable
x=-7
remember we disregarded that solution
i feel like ur overthinking it
its right infront of u
Ahh tell me the answer already so that i can understand how answer is made
So x=4,x=4?
were trying to find the dimensions of the pool
the dimensions would be like
width=
length=
thats the dimensions of a rectangle
width=x
length=x+3m
x=4m, all u need to do is sub this value in
@warm patio
ik u are lmao
So thats the answer?
Ohh ty
so for u answer u would just write width=4m length=7m
Why?
Ahh ok
are u trying to represent the width and length by x and x
cos u cant do that
if u wrote w=4 and l=7 that would be right
can i ask?
anyone knows logistic regression
can someone help me factorise this 😀
you've not got any common factors to take out
I would appreciate some help solving this: 2-(2-(2-(2-(2-(2-(2-2))))))
the answer is this, but i just dont get how to get to this answer
It says that the answer is 0 in the exercise but I get lost when trying to prove it.
Great
THIS IS NOT MULTIPLICATION, THEY ARE ALL SUBTRACTION
Yeah I realize that the last 2-2 inside the paranthesis will be 0. But where does the multiplication come in?
Salah
is this multiplication?
3
Damn, this one is giving me such a headache lol
Channel is busy @alpine sable @sour umbra
Pls
Wrong angle, theta is on the top
oh shit yeah I read it wrong way around
I guess ill just repost
16/13 then
I would appreciate some help solving this: 2-(2-(2-(2-(2-(2-(2-2))))))
Yeah but i get lost in the brackets lol
The last 2-(2-2) = 2
no
a(x) = 450 + 17 x
how do i do it so that 20 times as much until i get 2000
u want 450 + 17 x = 2000 ?
yeah
and u want to know for which x?
WhipStreak23
I think i got it, is it 91.18?
yeah should be
Can anyone tell me what is done here?
I know it's the divide multiply thing(idk what it's called) but why can't I just divide it simply?
is it $\sqrt{\frac{1}{1,732}}$ ?
SSJ_Sammy
Yeah
why did u include the Square Root again if u already did it once
from sqrt(1/3) to sqrt(1/1,732) it should be just 1/1,732
Hey could i get some help with
Compute the limit at x=0
still need help?
Very much
\everymath{\displaystyle}
Apply the fractional rule $\frac{a}{\frac bc}=\frac{ac}b$
i think you're supposed to take the limit of sin2x/2x as x approaches 0
@torpid flax do you get that ^?
soo do you get it now?
Ima try something, 1 min
Alright, thanks for the help
nah but do you get it tho?
i can continue on
Thought you were done
I can show you what i got
alr
5•12=5?
My bad
Then 12/6=2
So when you factor out the 12 you can divide it by 6 to get 2(2x+5)
ahh is see, (5x/6)12=60/6
i'd just apply that rule, factor x, cancel x
,w simplify \frac{\frac{x^2}{3}+\frac{5x}{6}}{\frac{x}{12}}
yeah so you're good
I just left it 1 step before here
or well a few steps actually
anyways they're both the same except the top the 2 is factored out
second they distributed 2
Makes way more sense now
So you’re good?
Yeah im good, thanks a lot
@alpine sable @severe pond Life savers
Q30
I got you
I know the answer but I don’t understand how to show the answer
I already asked my question wait your turn
bet sorry
Can you factor the polynomial in the denominator and then plug in 1?
Yah I didn’t think about that
You can’t because it gives a negative under the root. And factoring doesn’t do anything
This channel busy
Nvm plugging in 1 gives you 1/0
Oh I see there is a negative higher up lower down you wrote a plus sign XD
How can i make this a proper function
450 + 17 * 2000 wouldn't work obv
This channel is busy
I'm not talking to you.
This is a follow up to my older question
450 +17x = 2000 , then minus 450 => 17x = 1550 , then divide with 17
x = bla bla...
yeah thx
∫(Daman)dx
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
?
Does no one know limits
I can’t solve this limit
I know it’s infinity but I don’t know how to evaluate it
No we haven’t learned that yet so I assumed the teacher didn’t want that method
How does that help
It's a one handed limit so you can use graphical or numerical methods. To use algebraic methods I think you'd need to prove that the left-hand limit is equal to the right-hand limit, correct me if i'm wrong
Can anyone quick tell me what's 2+2
might be 1

no calculus
got it
yeah it looks like it
its not even an infinity lol
you cant approach 0 from the right for that function anyways
I know it’s infinity but I don’t know how to evaluate it
it legit doesnt exist because we cant approach that function from the right
of 1 at least
also btw that problem that we were solving yesterday had the stupidest solution
legit did reverse product rule 
yeah
IT WAS SO DUMB
like
you could rewrite it as the derivative of two functions
"its supposed to be easier than ibp" shut up ur making me feel bad for not seeing something obvious

nah i ended up turning it in with that rewritten solution
thank god
now i wait for the other questions to get graded

yeah
cuz remember we were getting sin u/u+ln u cos u
you can rewrite that as (sin u ln u)'
so lame
i just did u =sqrtx
hold on
i can send my work
found my work for that pepepega
also note that the formula for the circle is $$(x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2$$ where $(h,k)$ is the center and $r$=radius
blanket
you can easily find the radius by finding the distance between the point given and the center of the circle
since the radius is just the length from the center of the circle to a point on the circle

∫(Daman)dx
what did i wrong here?
cough
is this still busy
im not good at math 😦 (a computer nerd), can anyone give me an explanation regrading the 2nd question, like step by step pls 🥺
a sphere center at (x0, y0, z0), radius r is given by (x-x0)^2 + (y-y0)^2 + (z-z0)^2 = r^2
just realized this was posted
and it worked but it took like 30 seconds
i dont think you did anything wrong there
i need something faster
dont think there is anything faster other than flipping them all over and just adding regularly
but why is my solution so different than the actual solution
what matrix are you acting on with those transformations?
only got the information until "What i Did"
well i did
1*5/2*5+1*2/5*2+1/10=0.8
there must be something faster
other than knowing the fact that 2^-1 is 0.5, 5^-1 is 0.2, and 10^-1 is 0.1 then adding them together, there really isnt much to do
you could factor out a 1/10
and realize that you get 1/10(5+2+1) which is 8/10 which is 0.8
wait
explain more
that's an intresting way
if you factor out a 1/10
so
$$\frac{1}{10}\left(\frac{10}{1}\cdot\frac12+\frac{10}{1}\cdot\frac15+\frac{10}{1}\cdot\frac{1}{10}\right)$$
blanket
you see how the inside of the parenthesis will be 5+2+1?
if you look at it, 2 and 5 are factors of 10. SO you should be able to instantly work out that its 5/10 + 2/10 + 1/10 which equals to 8/10 or 0.8
👍
I’ve been trying to simplify this for ages but I cant get it to work. Would really appreciate if someone could help me out and walk me through it..
yeah im looking at it and i dont see anything wrong with your work
GREAT WAY
what can you write (a^2+2ab+b^2) as?
and what can you rewrite a^2-b^2 as on the bottom?
I solved the followup question in like 10 seconds
(a+b)^2?
yep
try rewriting it like that and you should see something cancel
you can also keep things factored and get common denominators but
¯_(ツ)_/¯
and (a-b)(a+b)
there you go!
yeah idk what's the better method, my head is absolute shambles rn lol
either one would work to be honest
been sitting way to much w/o any breaks but I just wanna finish this problem
just got notified that the task has a mistake
thanks fam
what was the mistake?
was transformation a wrong?
thats what i had a problem with
even if you multiply those two transformations together you wouldnt get a 2x2 matrix
awkward
the solutions was wrong thats what i got told
what do you mean by that?
just discussing it with my friend
ah i see
he meant you could multiply everything out
Process
just remember that (a+b)^2 can be broken into (a+b)(a+b), and that (a+b)(a-b) can turn into (a^2-b^2), and vice versa
make easier?
well, did my best 😦
@scarlet leaf
yeah
btw you could factor the difference of squares on the left term
oh
i have got something like this 😦
ohh, reallyy, all i just need to do is plug the r^2? the radius ?
oke, brother :>
@alpine sable Thank you 🙂
Free?
how do you find the equation of a line that is equidistant from 3 points in the xyz plane
(x,y,z)
what?
can someone get me a ticket to Australia?
anyone have a good tutorial video for solving x on a right triangle
help :P?
Let me ask a stupid question,
Isnt a recurring number infinity?
no, the definition of infinity is "a number greater than any assignable quantity or countable number". A recurring number like 0.333...... is not larger than all other numbers and therefore not infinity
A recurring number has an infinite number of the same number/s
but it's not infinity
Well ok what if you times it by 2
if you times what by 2?
A reoccurring number
then it gets twice as big
0.333...... * 2 = 0.666......
With a whole number
Same thing
gets twice as big
Multiply it the same way as you would with any other decimal
No it’s not DNE it’s infinite
Look up on wolfram alpha
The right side is negative infinite left side is positive infinite
Double side limit DNE
I feel like I did this wrong
Im supposed to find length of vector |v| and the vector is (1,1)
can someone confirm that I did this right?
looks fine
ty!
length of a vector is $\sqrt{a_{1}^2 + a_{2}^2}$
Lil Sachi
is x ln(x) - x the same as ln(x)^2
no its same as ln((ex)^x)
but when intigrating ln(x)
Sometimes I have to use x ln(x) - x and sometimes ln(x)^2
Someone who can help me with this: Calculate the volume of a cylinder of revolution circumscribed to a cube of volume 8m ^ 3.
its xln(x) - x where you got ln(x)^2 ?
then its xln(x) -x + 2ln(x) = xln(x) -x + ln(x^2)
Nvm i figured i think
its 2 ln(x) + ln(x)^2
cause u have to integrate 2/x and ln(x)/x
here’s the question I just dont grt it
substitute 2 + ln(x) as u
Can u help me?
Basically I'm proving that for this specific problem that Z is unbounded. I was just wondering if it's the case that Z is always going to be un-bounded when Non-basic Variables > Basic variables in terms of the amount of them is always true.... Because it essentially leaves no possible leaving basic var? Or is there a case where NBV > BV but it can be bounded still?
You just rub the magic conche and it'll tell you
Rubbing the magic conche
Now pls tell me
lmfao
and why, I need an explaination for the problem
No man I just need an explaination
Why everybody says that
I just simply don't understand the concept so I'm trying to get someone to explain it to me
Why do you have to always attach it to homework
Fuck's sake
I don't think there's an answer since (9-n)! will give a fraction and factorial can't be fraction
This world will never help u
No U are wrong
There's an actual answer
and what's that?
Wait man
lol this kid
What are u talking about
There's no 9-n in the question
Bro read the question again
The question says
9Pn is same as 9!/(9-n)!
9Pn-4 = 9!
lmfao
Yeah u are right
He doesn't know how to substitute a formula
Please stop I'm serious
Stop being rude
I'm trying to learn
What are you in discrete mathematics rn, doing combatorial math
Please stop
Yes bro u are right so what?
You didn't even state what area of math this is. Or ask how to start solving the problem. He just wants the answer and explanation so he doesn't have to do ti
it
so 9Pn never equals 9! + 4
Bro it's 9 P n-4
n-4
bruh
What am I missing?
How do I calculate average velocity
nothing I considered it as 9Pn -4 instead of 9p(n-4)
so
just remember if nPr = n!
then r = n-1
So...?
so as given 9!P n-4 = 9!
that means n-4 = 9-1
guys i need help i dont understand how to do (10^-3)^4
if some one can explain to me and help me
So n equals what?
can't you solve n-4 = 8?
yes
$$^nP_r = n!$$
$$\frac{n!}{(n-r)!} = n!$$
$$(n-r)! = 1$$
$$n-r = 1 ~or ~0$$
Spica
Wow that's awesome
so answer can be 12 or 13
was mentioned in my textbook
Like is is there a book that explains this rule specifically or a Youtube channel?
Please tell me what's ur textbook
idk about yt channel but
my boards book XD
What? Wdym?
Please I wanna buy that book
Are u in high school?
It was my boards book so that's not available worldwide
Like ur teacher's book or something?
yes for your info its mentioned in almost any algebra book conatining p and C
Wow
yeah kinda
Okay are u in High school?
yes
Senior?
yes
Okay there's another one do u want it?
ok
it says
btw you can refer hall and knight but that'll be too high for your lvl
$$\frac{n+2!}{(n)!}+3n = 74$$
Abstract
Oh I forgot to put like brackets
parentheses
$\frac{(n+2)!}{(n)!}+3n = \frac{(n+2)(n+1)(n)!}{(n)!}+3n= (n+2)(n+1)+3n$
Spica
now its quadratic in terms of n just solve it
Bro I was stuck at this point
I didn't know I have to like do the quadratic
Because our teacher always taught us that we like factor the 74
To axbxc
For example 120= 5 x 4 x 3 x 2
What do u mean?
I dunno man.. Yeah it helps in other problems
But u can't factor the 74 here
Then u equal n+1 = 5
Then it's an equation or something
there's 2 in lhs so it'll become 72 then factor it in 12*6 cause there will be a 6n term in lhs
Do it on calculator
What is "Ihs"?
left hand side
Obviously
Yes u can do fractions on calculator.
You need 1 side 0, yes
yes
To apply zero product property in the general sense
hi guys new here
