#help-0

1 messages · Page 807 of 1

swift harbor
#

yes

harsh belfry
#

I forgot I rewrote it it

#

Haha!

#

Sorry

swift harbor
#

ur good

#

did u do geometry yet

cursive horizon
polar mist
#

Ah okay good

harsh belfry
#

I have but that was a long time ago

swift harbor
#

think u can help me

cursive horizon
#

Help please

harsh belfry
#

post the question, I most likely dont know the proper equations

swift harbor
#

this is the question

#

wait

#

I just realized

#

its right

#

I can check it

#

easy dubs

#

rolling thru the math homework in 10 minutes

swift harbor
#

idek what im looking at

cursive horizon
#

|4/x-1|<=2. Solve for values of x

harsh belfry
#

so are you doing interval notation?

#

solve for x

polar mist
cursive horizon
#

So 4/x-1 = 2 and 4/x-1 = -2

swift harbor
polar mist
#

So a simple example. |-3x|=-(-3x) for positive x, and -3x for negative x.

swift harbor
#

bueno

cursive horizon
#

Ok I got the values but how do I know the directions and stuff

heavy gull
#

Can someone break this down please

urban dew
#

no

heavy gull
#

Excuse me?

dusk umbra
#

my friends...if i have a system of equations represented by some matrices

#

and a determinant is given

#

How can I go about solving for my variables?

heavy gull
#

Hey christian sorry to be a jerk but this channel is in use rn

dusk umbra
#

OH

heavy gull
#

Please use a different one

dusk umbra
#

my bad, didnt realize thats how it worked

heavy gull
#

Thx

rose parcel
dusk umbra
#

by the way what are you confused about in your problem @heavy gull

heavy gull
#

How to get the answer

dusk umbra
#

is the answer you have written down the answer or just what youve got so far

heavy gull
#

Its the answer from the back

dusk umbra
#

Well I can help you with the n part.

#

So what is n/n^2?

#

Do you know?

heavy gull
#

n^-1

placid spire
#

Or 1/n

dusk umbra
#

yes, thats right

#

so when you have something to an exponent, and that entire function is subject to another exponent, what happens?

oak hound
#

can u guys check questions 1?

dusk umbra
#

For exampe,(2^x)^y

oak hound
#

i need some urgent help

heavy gull
#

Thanks christian I think I found the answer so.ewhere else

#

I didnt know u could flip a fraction inside brackets to invert the exponent

dusk umbra
#

no problem glad you found it

#

let me know if you get stuck again

#

I dont know a lot but i think i understand this one

final ferry
#

can someone help me factorise this step by step 😀

ivory gulch
small bear
#

actually (a - 2 b + c) (a + 4 b + 2 c) but like good luck

dusty oxide
#

Can someone explain this step?

alpine sable
#

How do pepeHmm

dusty oxide
#

Anyone here? 😮

alpine sable
maiden mountain
#

Hello, can someone help me with this

dusty oxide
#

I just dont understand the algebraic part of it

maiden mountain
dusty oxide
#

How can we just move the 2

#

I mean its because its multiplication, but it doesnt click in my head

#

Or is it because you would take sin(x) times 2, and then sinx times cosX

#

Or do u first have to do 2*cos(x) and then take that times sin(x)

#

OH sorry for ping

#

I thought it was 10 mins

#

Fak, dont ban me please ❤️

polar mist
#

Don't worry. Also it's just factoring out the sin(x) and leaving the (2cos(x)-1)

dusty oxide
#

I kinda understand how its done, but I wouldnt be able to figure it out myself (its simple I know, but idk)

maiden mountain
dusty oxide
#

Because I assume we first have to do 2*cos(x), or is that exactly what we dont have to do

polar mist
#

Well 2sin(x) cos(x) = 2cos(x) sin(x)= sin(x)cos(x)*2. Since it's all multiplication the order writing it does not matter

frozen silo
#

need help ;/

polar mist
#

Just the same as 2xy is the same as 2yx or even x2y

dusty oxide
#

But if we were to expand that again, how is it done, isnt it sinx * 2 + sinx * cos(x) + sin(x) * 1

#

or am I dumb

buoyant kayak
#

sin(x)*2cos(x) - sin(x)*1

dusty oxide
#

oh yeah I forgot the minus

polar mist
#

Yeah you just distribute the sin(x) back in

dusty oxide
#

So its not sinx * 2 + sinx * cos(x) - sin(x) * 1

#

or is that the same

buoyant kayak
#

you're multiplying 1 term into 2 terms and ending up with 3

#

so no

dusty oxide
#

Okay so u have to multiply sin with 2cos(x)

#

Because its a multiplication inside the parenthesis

#

So its prioritised?

buoyant kayak
#

2cos(x) is one term

#

2 is the coefficient of cos(x)

#

if you were to multiply 3(4x+6) what would you get

dusty oxide
#

Yeah so bascially 2 * cos(x)

#

Oh yeah

#

12x+18

#

Okay makes sense I guess

buoyant kayak
#

and you did that by multiplying 3*4x and 3*6

#

where 4 is the coefficient of x

dusty oxide
#

Yeah, thanks that clearified it

buoyant kayak
#

👍

void herald
#

Hey do any of you guys know how to do parametric equations by chance? (Sorry mid convo)

buoyant kayak
#

send the question

void herald
#

I’m doing some hw on it rn and I want to make sure I’m doing it right

finite pecan
#

😭 when all the question-# chats are being in use so u cant ask a question either lolol

void herald
#

@buoyant kayak here is the hw👆

buoyant kayak
#

looks good to me so far

void herald
#

How would you find the starting location?

buoyant kayak
#

plug in 0 for t to find (x,y)

void herald
#

Ok

#

This is kinda off topic but like are you guys like teachers that help students like me on discord on math in general?

buoyant kayak
#

i'm a freshman in college lol

void herald
#

LMAO

stray estuary
#

any calc 1 people in here 👀

void herald
#

Pre calc💀

stray estuary
#

cuz like

#

im tryna do this

#

with just calc 1 techniques but i need integration by parts Sad_Boi_Hours

alpine sable
#

im gonna cry inside if I have to take calc BC

buoyant kayak
topaz scaffold
#

You can easily get rid of the sin√x by expanding the sin(2√x) on the top

stray estuary
#

well im limiting myself to only calc 1 techniques

#

its not hard to simplify it, but im having trouble getting rid of this term

#

$$\int\frac{\sin(u)}{u}du$$

ocean sealBOT
#

blanket

stray estuary
#

(after doing u=sqrt(x))

topaz scaffold
stray estuary
#

yeah there isnt

topaz scaffold
#

I forgot what this is called

#

Shoot

stray estuary
#

and im just trying to get rid of it without integration by parts

stray estuary
#

the umm

topaz scaffold
#

Ah yes

stray estuary
#

dirichlet integral

#

is what it was called

topaz scaffold
#

I thought it was just called the sine integral

stray estuary
#

swear it was dirichlet

#

maybe im wrong

#

(to be fair, dirichlet integral would probably refer to a number of integrals that were unintegrable and this is just one of them)

topaz scaffold
topaz scaffold
#

Ah

#

I'm assuming it's sin(2√x)

stray estuary
#

ye

alpine sable
#

Can anyone please help me in the trigonometry section plz

topaz scaffold
#

How would you even do ∫ln(x)cos(x)dx without by parts?

#

@stray estuary ^^ ?

topaz scaffold
#

Simplifying and using using the sub u =√x I got $$\int \qty( \frac{\sinu}{u} + \ln(u)\cos(u) )\dd{u}$$

ocean sealBOT
#

RipeOrange

Simplifying and using using the sub u =√x I got $$\int \qty( \frac{\sinu}{u} + \ln(u)\cos(u) )\dd{u}$$
```Compilation error:```! Undefined control sequence.
<argument> \sinu 
                 
l.55 ...\qty( \frac{\sinu}{u} + \ln(u)\cos(u) )\dd
                                                  {u}$$
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.```
topaz scaffold
#

Trying to solve the integral without integration by parts ig

#

Nope

#

I don't know much calc 3

#

No idea, it's from blanket's question

#

Blanket the person

topaz scaffold
stray estuary
#

oh hi

#

well its strictly using calculus 1 techniques

#

i dont believe IBP was a technique in calculus 1

#

at least not for my calc 1

#

is it?

topaz scaffold
#

Idk I've never taken calc 1

stray estuary
#

i've never taken a formal calc 1 course either

topaz scaffold
#

I've always thought it was calc 2 tho

stray estuary
#

i assumed it was complex enough that it was calc 2

#

and calc 1 was strictly substitution and algebraic manipulation of expressions

#

man

#

well

#

im going to try and stick to substitutions and see if i get anywhere

#

if not, ill give and use ibp

stray estuary
#

most likely

#

i really just wanted to knock this out with ibp but oh well

#

a couple points loss is fine

#

sad i wish it was a bit more explicit in what constituted calc 1 techniques

topaz scaffold
#

Oh shoot

#

Will I get docked points for using stuff before it's taught?

#

This one

stray estuary
#

how does that help?

buoyant ivy
#

hegerty moment

topaz scaffold
#

$\qty(\int \frac{\sin(\sqrt{x})}{\sqrt{x}} \dd{x}) + \qty(\int \ln(x) \cos(x) ,dx )$ ?

ocean sealBOT
#

RipeOrange

#

∫(Daman)dx

#

∫(Daman)dx

topaz scaffold
#

Wait, what happened to the natural log?

#

Ah

alpine sable
#

thats ugly

stray estuary
#

$$\int\frac{4x^{-1/2}\sin^2(\sqrt{x})}{4\sqrt{x}\sin(\sqrt{x})}dx$$

ocean sealBOT
#

blanket

stray estuary
#

@alpine sable where is the conjugate here

#

yeah i was trying it iw as like thonk

#

ok technically im in honors diff eq

#

we're doing integration review

#

and my professor's limiting us on techniques

#

its like extra work for honors on my transcript

#

yeah

#

idk i just call it honors de but its technically a program

alpine sable
ocean sealBOT
topaz scaffold
alpine sable
#

Ohh then RIP its hard to solve without it then

stray estuary
#

i just feel okay

#

because i was able to do one of the problems

#

$$\int\frac{a\sin(x)+b\cos(x)}{c\sin(x)+d\cos(x)}dx$$

ocean sealBOT
#

blanket

stray estuary
#

this was the first one i was able to do

#

math and biochem

#

dont ask why i put math, i just like the subject

#

i dont like it right now though

#

im just sad

#

na

ocean sealBOT
#

∫(Daman)dx

edgy bay
#

Math trash

woven echo
#

yea p sure as long as they are factors they can be cancelled

#

i believe so

stray estuary
#

they can

gray wind
#

$\sum_{t=1}^{w}\frac{a_t}{(1-u^\frac{1}{2})^t} = 0$

ocean sealBOT
#

BOuRNe_AGAIN

gray wind
#

Is it possible to somehow manipulate this into a polynomial in u? a_t is a function of t and w. Is there any info one could find out about the polynomial that could be formed by manipulation for a given w?

humble tiger
#

<@&286206848099549185>

ocean sealBOT
#

∫(Daman)dx

#

∫(Daman)dx

rich ivy
#

how do I solve this

#

6x+12

#

I wrote it wrong

#

jesus

woven echo
#

u made that hella complicated

#

lol

rich ivy
#

uhhh

#

alright thanks

glass lichen
#

I mean, it's a wall of text

alpine ledge
#

Guys

#

Need help

#

?

#

Ya ik that

#

Wait how

#

Ohh ok..

#

Ya

ocean sealBOT
#

∫(Daman)dx

#

∫(Daman)dx

alpine ledge
#

Oh

#

I know the answer now

#

Thanks a lot

#

I will try it by myself

alpine sable
#

how to calculate square root without calculator?

alpine ledge
#

I m weak at factorization

alpine sable
#

wym

ocean sealBOT
#

∫(Daman)dx

alpine sable
#

what?

woven echo
#

i figure he means he needs to simplify it

alpine sable
#

so i just half the number i need to find the square root of?

placid zinc
#

Are you asking for your personal interest, or is your class telling you to find a specific square root?

woven echo
#

yea probs simplify it

alpine sable
#

Quick question that's a bit bizarre, if you get one B or C on an assessment but your other grades are high 80s and 90s will it affect your GPA at all?

placid zinc
#

The square root of 121 is 11.
That's because 11² = 121

alpine sable
#

but like i still dont understand how do i find square root without any help

#

like with any number

woven echo
#

you have to think of what perfect squares exist

placid zinc
#

With any number, you can't

alpine ledge
#

Its easy

#

Do it by prime factorization

woven echo
#

for some numbers, your only option is to turn it into perfect square factors

alpine sable
#

what abt

#

negative

#

numbers

alpine ledge
#

Omg

woven echo
#

since the negative is outside, you imagine its multiplying it by -1 in a sense

long reef
#

<@&286206848099549185>

alpine sable
#

oh it's the same if it were positive?

woven echo
#

if it was inside, it wouldn't be possible with real numbers

placid zinc
#

I think the best suggestion I could give would be "memorize some squares"

#

You'll memorize the common ones with practice

long reef
#

oh im new srry

alpine sable
#

what does this 3 mean

#

oh thanks

#

abt the -144 square root

#

Anyone good with spreadsheet programming?

ocean sealBOT
#

∫(Daman)dx

placid zinc
#

Yes, but this channel is busy @alpine sable

alpine sable
#

pain

#

yeah

#

so -12 x -12 is -144?

#

or

woven echo
#

no the negative is being multiplied to the square root

#

-1( sqrt(144) )

alpine sable
#

yeah kind of

woven echo
#

for example, what do you think it would be if that - were say a 2 instead

#

yea

alpine ledge
alpine sable
#

or

#

it'll

#

just be

#

12

woven echo
#

you are multiplying that 2 by the result of the square root

alpine ledge
#

Can anyone help me in the question

woven echo
#

there u go

alpine sable
#

so what if it was that small 2

#

wait

#

nvm

woven echo
#

they usually wouldn't put it since its just assumed its square root of 2 without a number on the radical

#

but yea that little number determines what type of root you are getting

alpine sable
#

if it were a small 3 next to it i just have to find the cubed root of that number ?

woven echo
#

yes but what may confuse you is there could still be a value in front that it is multiplied by

#

that's saying take the cube root of 125, then multiply it by 3

#

which is why the - is multiplied after, you are just multiplying by -1

alpine sable
#

so 15?

woven echo
#

yep

alpine sable
#

thank u

woven echo
#

np

alpine sable
#

and thank u daman

void herald
#

<@&286206848099549185> can you see if I did my parametric equations right?

#

When do I ping them?

woven echo
#

i guess fwiw he posted it earlier in another channel but still

#

better to stick to 1

void herald
#

Ok I’ll do that next time

#

Understood

wispy junco
woven echo
#

this does not seem easy

marble iron
#

can anyone help me with 9th grade math

jolly stone
# wispy junco

for real number solution, take cube root on both equations, then expand to quadratic equation

#

hold on, actually take the square root again and dont forget +-

marble iron
#

anyone?

#

i really need help

jolly stone
#

+-

placid zinc
#

In fact, use all 6 complex roots of unity, and you'll get all 6 solutions. ± are likely the only two real ones

marble iron
#

anyone help

placid zinc
#

@marble iron channel busy

marble iron
#

what?

wispy junco
#

OHH THANSK SM

marble iron
#

can u not help

wispy junco
#

i dont even know where to start here

jolly stone
#

every term there is a power of 2, so you can try write it out as 2^something = 2^other thing

past ivy
#

nvm i didnt see x

wispy junco
#

i got 6/7 for the first one

#

where is 5/4 in it?

#

oh is there multiple solutions

#

OHH alright

#

i dont get that

placid zinc
#

Know your exponent rules, haha.
1/8 = 2^(-3)
See why?

#

To Colin

wispy junco
#

ohhh yes cuz 2^3 is 8 and to get rid of the negative exponent u do 1 over it right

red carbon
#

So ive integrated a function to get:

.5 x^2 + .5 y^2 + C = 0.

Then I moved C to the other side and multiplied everything by 2 to get C alone:

-2C = x^2 + y^2

I know that the "-2C term" can be rewritten as just C, aka:

C = x^2 +y^2

By what is the reason for this? I know it's a constant and it can be anything... but how would I justify that?

Would this suffice?

"Since C is any constant that is unknown, multiplying it by another number or negating it doesnt matter"

valid wagon
#

Anyone able to help with this?

#

It’s hw

#

I cant do the 1/e^(x-2)-1

#

It always goes to 1/0

#

Indeterminate

#

Are u not gonna help me bc u think it’s a test

#

Oh thanks

#

I’m from uk so it’s different it’s just a level maths

#

We do everything

#

I have tried l hopitals rule

#

I got stuck in a loop

alpine sable
#

@alpine sableCan I ask you a question about finding the range of the composite function?

valid wagon
#

Do I have to combine the fractions into one

#

Why differentiate though?

#

I cant just differentiate becuase it’s not in the form f/g where lim (f/g)=lim(f’/g’)

#

It can’t be

#

This is further maths a level

#

U cant just take deriv tho

#

There is no rule that says lim f = lim f’

#

Fuck

#

We cant use mc Laurin expansions bc x=2 is out of range

#

So l lhopitals must be only way

#

There must be some neat trick

#

But if u try differnecaiting top and bottom on that u get stuck in loop

#

This uses Taylor series as example but we haven’t done that yet

#

The thing is it must be using either mc laurin series , binomial series or lhopitals rule or just brute force algebra becuase that’s all the techniques we have Learned and my teacher wouldn’t give it something we haven’t learned yet

#

I have lesson tomorrow , I’ll ask my teacher and show you the solution once it get it

#

Yeah

#

I’ll send you the solution tomororw

ocean glacier
#

I need to find this point for collisions in my code, however I have no clue where to start

#

everything is in vectors though, so all I really need is an equation to find it's position on the x axis

#

it is

jolly stone
#

Two circles will tangent at the point where you connect the line between the center of two circles

ocean glacier
#

no

#

no that wont

jolly stone
#

Oh I misunderstood

#

You have a velocity also

#

Yeah my bad, that's gonna be a bit tedious

valid wagon
#

It does

#

Nah u keep differentiating

#

Until you get 2e^x-2

#

Which 2

#

Yeye

#

1/2

#

Lhopitals

#

Keep differnciating top and bottom

#

You end up with e^x-2/2e^x-2

#

Which is 1/2

#

Yeah after re writing as single fraction

#

Yeah

ocean sealBOT
#

∫(Daman)dx

#

∫(Daman)dx

jolly stone
ocean glacier
valid wagon
#

So after differentiating tøp and bottom twice

#

I get that

#

Sub in 2

#

You get 1/2

#

Not really

#

I mean I did

#

But like I just used l hospitals rule twice

#

Becuase we are differentiating top and bottom separately not treating it as one whole expression

#

We are using the fact that lim f/g=lim f’/g’

jolly stone
#

So then you can know what angle the obj1 does relative to the starting position and obj2

smoky isle
#

hello

#

listen here fella

#

s

#

can you please walk me through W=x+xyz for z?

#

what even is that

alpine sable
#

Hello, for the continuity tests, what does it mean by limit as x approaches c = f(c)?

#

so it makes sure that theres no removable discontinuity or jump?

#

it is confusing me a bit and i just need it better explained - forgot to write it in my notes.

ocean glacier
# jolly stone

the problem is that to draw that you need to know the point it will hit on

#

also trig functions are slow and i would rather not run them every frame

jolly stone
#

Wait so you're animating this every frame? Or you want exact value?

ocean glacier
#

Its to interpolate between frames

#

for continuous collision checking

jolly stone
#

If you're animating at every frame, you can detect if distance between 2 circles is less than the sum of radius

#

Collide when true

ocean glacier
jolly stone
#

What issue?

ocean glacier
#

which is if an object moves so fast it goes through an object between frames, it won't collide

jolly stone
#

Yep it does happen, can't be fixed

#

Alternatively you need some heavy math

ocean glacier
#

so i need to calculate the position that they would collide between frames

#

currently the idea is to transform 1 ball's position and velocity into the frame of reference of the other one, then check where they will collide, then transform that position back

jolly stone
#

Oh actually

#

You can trace out the line of trajectory, and detect if that line will intersect that circle or not

#

It won't give you exact location of collision, but it will definitely tell if it collides or not

#

Question is, do you actually need the point of collision

ocean glacier
#

yes

jolly stone
#

Or just want to check if it collides

ocean glacier
#

because I need to get the collision normal so i can bounce it

jolly stone
ocean glacier
#

I already have that

jolly stone
#

Wait I sent you the wrong link sorry

#

Not exact formula but the general idea, which still involves trig

red carbon
#

Sorry, was someone able to answer my question? I got 2 notifications here but i cant find any answer to my question

ocean sealBOT
#

∫(Daman)dx

somber osprey
#

hello

next bridge
#

i need to find the measures🥲

tight locust
#

x + (x+6) = 90

#

2x + 6 = 90

#

2x = 84

#

x = 42

#

x+6 = 48

#

Lol!

next bridge
tight locust
#

it said you needed both angles

#

they are 42 and 48

next bridge
#

explain?

glass lichen
#

let the measure of the angle be x, what's the complement of x?

#

ie what angle is complementary to x

ocean glacier
#

but I do need the intersection points

#

wait i don't need the /2

#

i need the 2 intersection points between 2 circles (of equal size)

#

well yes, assuming point c is the one opposite to a

simple stream
#

question

#

The operator of a boat wishes to cross a 5km wide river that is flowing to the east at . He wants to reach the exact point on the opposite shore 15 min after starting. With what speed and in what direction should the boat travel?
my question is
wouldn't the direction be east of north?
my book says west of north

#

Agreed

#

the physics server is no where near as active as this server

#

ok

#

k

#

10 m/s

#

Lol

#

forgot to write that

#

I understand the velocity parts

#

but

#

it says the direction

#

is west of north

#

shouldn't it be east of north?

#

the direction

#

that is all I want

#

yes right?

#

but my book says west north

#

my theory is

#

?

#

so it would make you go to that exact opposite point right?/

#

ok that was my theory as to why it was west north

ancient saddle
simple stream
#

well the calculation part ik

#

I understand

#

just direction because my word problem understanding isn't so good

#

yes V=5.5m/s

#

then you use pythagorem theorem

#

5.5^2+10^2

#

and calculate the angle then ezzzz

#

x/t is velocity

#

yep angle and velocity

#

yes just inverse tan

#

d/t is speed

#

displacement/time is velocity

#

yeah I understand thanks

#

yes

#

it's because exact point on the opposite yes?

#

daman it's because the opposite exact point right?

#

is that why it's west north?

#

north west *

#

yeah ok that makes more sense

#

so let's say that piece of information was never there

#

would that mean it would be east north?

#

north west

#

yes okay you're missing one piece of information

#

question
The operator of a boat wishes to cross a 5km wide river that is flowing to the east at . He wants to reach the exact point on the opposite shore 15 min after starting. With what speed and in what direction should the boat travel?
my question is
wouldn't the direction be east of north?
my book says west of north

#

it says he wants to reach the exact point on the opposite shore

#

yes look I understand the unit circle

#

5.5m/s north

#

it says 10m/s east

#

which would mean 5.5m/s north is what I get

#

yes

#

@alpine sable

#

what would push you east?

#

yes

#

which is why the boat must go 10m/s west

#

for it to reach the exact opposite point

alpine sable
simple stream
#

that's my understanding of it

alpine sable
#

help

simple stream
#

yes that speed is 5.5m/s

#

cool physics word problems

#

need to be good at understanding

#

trying to get there lol

#

well thanks

#

I'll be going now

woeful pulsar
#

actually, that's usually how integrals are done analytically

night geyser
#

ty

#

lmao they did this before

#

do they really think theres a demographic overlap

solemn eagle
#

Can someone help me with part b?

#

This is what I did

#

But the answer key says -47 m/s and I’m very confused on where I messed up

rocky atlas
solemn eagle
#

I see

#

I’ll ask my teacher about that tomorrow then

#

Thank you!

ocean sealBOT
#

∫(Daman)dx

solemn eagle
#

Wait why do you have -16(4)?

#

Shouldn’t it be -16(2) if we’re finding t=2

#

Hmm okay thank you for your help

#

I think my teacher messed up on the answer key

#

Since I got -15 and you and someone else got -15 too

#

Okie, thank you again!

#

Nope! I got the correct answers for the rest of them

#

Thanks for asking tho

alpine sable
#

How would I integrate sqrt(x^2+2x+1)?

#

what as u

#

tho

#

ik that

#

but what value of u

#

gotcha

#

k

gray isle
#

sqrt{a^2} = |a|
consider the positive and negative case

alpine sable
#

ok

#

can u even get it in one of those forms

gray isle
#

and the end result can be expressed nicely if you use the sign (not sine) function

#

no

alpine sable
#

ive never seen the sign stuff

gray isle
#

you're forgetting that
x^2+2x+1 = (x+1)^2

alpine sable
#

(x^2)/2 + x

#

i think this is meant to be done with a calc. ive never seen one this difficult in class

gray isle
#

there can be different forms

#

sqrt((x+1)^2) = |x+1|
and |x+1|/(x+1) = sgn(x+1)
for x \neq -1

ocean sealBOT
#

∫(Daman)dx

steep plover
#

help pls

alpine sable
# steep plover help pls

Point Q has coords (a, f(a+h)). See if you can use distance formula to find lengths of the sides

#

Is this NFA equivalent to $(ab)^(ba)^ \cup aa^*$

ocean sealBOT
#

Manzareh

alpine sable
mighty sinew
#

What would be the easiest way of showing that if a,b are smaller than some prime p, then p can't divide ab without using the FTA?

alpine sable
orchid python
#

hey, is there any site like Symbolab that I can use? thanks

mighty sinew
#

yeah good enough

#

tyy

tender blade
#

Why does this simplify to 6a^4b^5c? The bases are different so you can't add the powers right?

onyx lodge
#

how would one approach this question

steep plover
#

@alpine sable

jagged imp
# onyx lodge

this channel is taken but the idea is to get the general form of the tangent line in terms of the point of tangency first, and then find the x intercept of that and set it equal to -2

alpine sable
#

Point P is (a+h, f(a+h)), Point Q is (a, f(a+h))

orchid python
#

how can I differeniate this sqrt(x^2+(2x-3)^2)

wanton crag
#

is this only for maths or can i ask science too?

orchid python
#

when I need to use the chain rule @alpine sable ?

#

can you give me some

#

I don'

#

know where techinically I have to use it

#

ok

alpine sable
#

Given that sqrt of 4.5 = 2.121 and sqrt of 45 = 6.708, then sqrt of 4500 - sqrt of 450 = ?

ocean sealBOT
#

∫(Daman)dx

alpine sable
#

Given that sqrt of 4.5 = 2.121 and sqrt of 45 = 6.708, then sqrt of 4500 - sqrt of 450 = ?
What's the pattern here

#

Okay

orchid python
#

thank you @alpine sable

stray estuary
#

i did haha

#

it was pain

#

trust

#

my god ive never done something so atrociously difficult

#

i wont HA

wild kraken
#

is the answer 2

#

the second person is trustworthy

jagged raptor
#

thanks you too

wild kraken
mellow tinsel
#

Can someone tell me what this means?

jagged imp
#

Probably that the vector b is in R^m but this channel is taken

mellow tinsel
#

Whoops, my bad

alpine sable
#

hii can somebody explain how to solve these out

next hatch
#

?L = 1m^3

#

that'd probs be easier

valid nexus
#

If a + 1/a= 9 , then the value of a^3 +1/a^3 is is?

orchid python
#

hey

#

I have this function

#

y = tan^2 (x)

#

I want to apply the chain rule to it

#

but I am confused which value of the f(x) should be

#

here g(x) is tan(x)

woeful pulsar
#

can you express it as a composite function?

orchid python
#

and f(x) is x^2 or f(tanx)

valid nexus
#

this

orchid python
#

i am practicing on Khan academy

#

so f(x) here is x^2 and g(x) is tan(x) right

woeful pulsar
valid nexus
#

ye

woeful pulsar
#

you don't have to solve for a here

orchid python
#

I thought there are 2 functions

mental bridge
#

how do u solve this

woeful pulsar
mental bridge
#

y

orchid python
#

if there is only one function, how can I apply the chain rule then?

woeful pulsar
#

tan is a function yeah

orchid python
#

yeah I meant tan(x) is a function

woeful pulsar
#

erm

orchid python
#

I got 2x*sec^2x

#

but this is not the answer

woeful pulsar
#

that doesn't look right hmm

elfin fiber
#

helpp

#

😭

woeful pulsar
#

essentially chain rule says the change in f(g(x)) depends on f'(g(x)) because that's how fast f changes but we have to scale it with how fast g changes

orchid python
#

i'm here

#

yeah I got this part

alpine sable
#

is x^-2 = -x^2

#

?

orchid python
#

yeah, but the f(x) is not x^2?

rigid wind
#

f(y) = y^2, y = tanx

woeful pulsar
#

erm

orchid python
#

yeah I got it

woeful pulsar
#

i think you might be a bit too strict on the notation here

#

because x, y all these are just variables

#

we can just say f(x)=x^2, it's the same as saying f(y)=y^2 or f(t)=t^2

orchid python
#

yeah

woeful pulsar
#

identifying the composite function is like the first step though

rigid wind
#

yea

#

you just write out the answer, not much showing what to solve

#

lol

elfin fiber
#

help plsss

#

what

woeful pulsar
elfin fiber
#

8

woeful pulsar
#

do you know how ratios work?

elfin fiber
#

yeah

tight locust
#

no.

elfin fiber
#

but i don't get ques 10

orchid python
#

hey

orchid python
woeful pulsar
fair osprey
elfin fiber
#

😭

tight locust
elfin fiber
#

ohh

tight locust
#

in other words, the two variables will always differ by a constant factor

elfin fiber
#

i got it

#

for the first one

#

do i simplify?

balmy patrol
#

can someone pls help me

#

i have no clue on how to figure thus out

elfin fiber
#

m

#

how do i figure it out??

tight locust
elfin fiber
#

the first one isn't equivalent right?

elfin fiber
tight locust
#

then do the variables differ by a constant factor?

elfin fiber
#

howww

#

ughh

woeful pulsar
#

hmm looks okay

orchid python
#

thank you @alpine sable

woeful pulsar
elfin fiber
#

how

#

i

#

know

orchid python
#

one is with respect to x one is with respect to tanx

#

is this correct?

#

yeah

woeful pulsar
woeful pulsar
elfin fiber
#

ok

#

let me see

#

how do i like

#

make it into a ratio?

woeful pulsar
#

yeah

elfin fiber
#

14 on top 16 on bottom?

woeful pulsar
#

well up to you really

elfin fiber
#

ok

#

it's not the same right?

orchid python
#

I also can apply the chain rule in this function, right: d/dx tan(sqrt(x))

abstract tapir
elfin fiber
#

@woeful pulsar

rugged tide
elfin fiber
#

broo

woeful pulsar
ocean sealBOT
#

∫(Daman)dx

silver relic
# rugged tide

let the whole thing be equal to x, then x = sqrt(6-x) because it contains itself

ocean sealBOT
elfin fiber
woeful pulsar
#

is this prove or disprove

woeful pulsar
elfin fiber
#

okkk

#

but

woeful pulsar
#

are you sure p is an odd prime?

woeful pulsar
#

okay try proving for p=2 first

elfin fiber
#

it's not a proportional relationship right?

woeful pulsar
orchid python
#

,help

ocean sealBOT
#

A brief description and guide on how to use me was sent to your DMs!
Please use ,list to see a list of all my commands, and ,help cmd to get detailed help on a command!

abstract tapir
#

yep thanks

elfin fiber
abstract tapir
elfin fiber
#

it b??

woeful pulsar
elfin fiber
#

they aren't

abstract tapir
#

by mistake

ocean sealBOT
sacred aurora
#

4

#

for a

#

then do the limit from left then limit from right

woeful pulsar
#

so is the statement true?

#

^^

woeful pulsar
#

okay say you have an odd prime, then it's 2k+1 then...?

ocean sealBOT
woeful pulsar
abstract tapir
#

👍

woeful pulsar
#

if p is odd p is 2k+1

#

continue from there

#

where did you get -2 from

#

p^2 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1 yeah

ocean sealBOT
woeful pulsar
#

how did you get this

#

observe this

abstract tapir
#

anyone know how to solve it

ocean sealBOT
woeful pulsar
#

whoops

#

okay p is odd

#

so p=2k+1

#

so this

#

observe

ocean sealBOT
elfin fiber
#

sorry

woeful pulsar
elfin fiber
#

c is hard

#

idk

woeful pulsar
elfin fiber
#

what

woeful pulsar
#

what are the ratios in part c?

elfin fiber
#

ok

#

1:5

woeful pulsar
#

yeah is the other ratio the same?

elfin fiber
#

no

#

@woeful pulsar

#

it's not

woeful pulsar
#

what's the other ratio?

elfin fiber
#

3.8:19?

woeful pulsar
#

yeah is it the same or different?

elfin fiber
#

uh

#

same?

#

ig

woeful pulsar
#

1 : 5
3.8 : 19
you can try multiplying by 3.8 to see?

elfin fiber
#

ok

#

times what?

woeful pulsar
#

1*3.8 : 5*3.8

elfin fiber
#

ok

#

lol

#

it is

#

what abt ques 11?

somber osprey
#

wsp

kindred trout
elfin fiber
#

nvm i got it

#

tysm for the help..

#

gn!

mortal flame
#

why cos + sin for this?

#

apparently it's the angle notation for quaternions, but not sure if I should know this trig

blazing compass
#

Can someone help with this??

fallen sky
somber osprey
#

OK

half frost
#

Why is there a S under 2.0 m/s ?

#

Is it because it's 2.0 m/s squared?

radiant niche
#

basically the question given is acceleration unit which is 2.0 m/s^2

#

so as it is s^2 , one of the s is shifted down

#

thus leaving 2.0m/s^1

half frost
#

So, he wants the final units to be m/s . So he moves the "2 down

radiant niche
#

yes

#

the final answer should be m/s

#

the unit

half frost
#

if he wanted the units to be in m/s 2, then square the 5?

radiant niche
#

nope , 5.0 is as it is

#

the down s and the s which is in 4.0 s gets cancelled

#

which leaves 5.0 m/s + 2.0 m/s (4.0)

half frost
#

Yes, but it mean if I wanted the answer to be in m/s"2

radiant niche
#

they asked velocity

half frost
#

ahh, so the square is always acceleration ?

radiant niche
#

if they asked acceleration then we should get final answer in ms/^2

alpine sable
#

I'm looking at the solutions, why is it for AB^T the solution says to do A * B first and get the transpose of that, but for AA^T the solution does A * transpose of A?

radiant niche
half frost
#

gotcha! Thank you very much!

radiant niche
#

welcome

alpine sable
#

.

#

Can someone help me with this? I am getting BigTetha(n^4) not O(n^3) I don't know if this is correct

#

also why it is O(n^3) in best case since in best case n=0 hence we get O(1)

subtle nebula
#

Find the sum of the geometric series 12 + 6 + 3 + ...

i have no idea what the last term is?

#

ok nvm i know now lol

#

inifinite gemoetric series

barren jacinth
#

can anyone help me what is this question even asking

vale wigeon
#

it's asking you to select which statement from your list must be true

barren jacinth
#

but i dont understand the statements 😫

opal wyvern
#

My professor just posted exam results, and it says the mean was 44.07, SD=13.2, and R=24-69

#

I got a 69, does that mean I scored highest in the class?

alpine sable
#

What's R? Range, then yes I think.

opal wyvern
#

Idk it just says R

#

I'm thinking range too but idk how tf i got highest score in the class

alpine sable
lucid aurora
#

Is anyone able to help me with this?

alpine sable
#

what does $X_1,X_2 \sim Ber(p)$ mean? Is it a joint probability distribution?

ocean sealBOT
#

faraday

vale wigeon
#

think it might just mean X1 and X2 both follow the same distribution

nocturne saddle
#

this maybe a bit advanced, but can anybody help me?

#

Still, dont have any ideas :(

jolly stone
#

p(2^(p-1)-1) = m^n
If p = 2, that thing becomes 2 = 2^1
Then we now only consider odd primes
It is clear that m must have a factor of p, so let m = kp for some positive integer k
(2^(p-1)-1) = k^n p^(n-1)
Here is my thought so far

stray estuary
#

hey all

#

i have another question

alpine sable
stray estuary
nocturne saddle
#

actually

#

the exponent must be greater or equal 1

vale wigeon
#

are you sure you want to allow the exponent to be 1

#

because then your question becomes trivial, and i don't think that's what you intended

alpine sable
#

Is there a difference between writing $y = ax^2$ and $f(x)=ax^2$?

ocean sealBOT
#

Etienne

placid zinc
#

That first one relates a variable called "y" to a variable called "x".

That second one defines a function called "f", which takes x as an input, and outputs ax²

alpine sable
#

But so if I was looking to take the derivative of y or f(x) I would get the same thing

placid zinc
#

Ye

alpine sable
#

Okay

#

Cool

#

Cheers mate

proud apex
obsidian crane
#

9

proud apex
#

how do i do this

obsidian crane
#

1/5 multiplies with 10

proud apex
#

oh

#

ok

obsidian crane
#

It's the rule

proud apex
#

ohh

#

i get it

#

thanks

radiant barn
#

Hello

#

Oh

vagrant frost
#

Can somebody explain to me when using y = mx + c

0 = 2x - 1
x = 1/2

Why is it that x is 1/2?

worldly island
#

Decided to relearn integration for fun, struggling how to find the maximum point for this equation e^x=2x^2

#

How do I isolate the X

radiant barn
#

Oh sorry

faint crane
#

eh how did they find the range?

#

like the range is the maximum value that the function can take with every output right?

#

so like you can put anything in but the values will be between -2 and 2

#

like if you put for x = 8 in the equation

#

the value will be -126

worldly island
#

Since the function is modded the y values only exist between 2 and minus 2

faint crane
#

but how

#

again

#

if you put 8 in the equation

#

oh wait

#

ehhh

#

ahh

#

nvm

#

thgnxxz ❤️

worldly island
#

Nw lol can get confusing sometimes

#

How have they found the minimum point here

undone dock
worldly island
#

@undone dock phrased the question wrong lol lemme do it again

#

This is the question, part a how can I find out the max value algebraically without subbing in

undone dock
worldly island
#

Ah right no worries

#

Thought it was possible

undone dock
#

Not as far as i know, sorry

alpine sable
#

Hello, having a bit of trouble with this problem

#

Don't know how to find the limit as x approaches negative infinity

#

I already found the limit as x approaches infinity (1/2) but I'm not sure how to go about showing my work for finding the other imit

small bear
#

Well it is analogous to finding the limit as x approaches infinity you just need to be careful with the sign of x

#

What did you do to find the limit as x approaches positive infinity?

alpine sable
#

i divided the numerator and denominator by the largest power

#

so

#

let me write it out

small bear
#

alright

alpine sable
#

i did this

#

then i got sqrt 1 + 0 / 2 + 0

small bear
#

alright, that is good, except I want to retrace a bit because there is a vital step that is missed that will help us with the negative infinity scenario

alpine sable
#

mhm

small bear
#

let me also write it out

ocean sealBOT
#

peaceGiant

small bear
#

now let us look at the top part

#

when you need to put the x inside the square root, you must make sure that x is positive

alpine sable
#

mhm

small bear
#

does that make sense?

alpine sable
#

yeah

small bear
#

because of that, a step we usually forget to do (and in the case of positive x values we don't need) is wrap that x in an absolute value

#

since |x|>=0

alpine sable
#

following so far

ocean sealBOT
#

peaceGiant

alpine sable
#

god i should really learn latex

small bear
#

what do I mean about the sign, let's look at the case where x is negative, and for a concrete example lets take x=-5

alpine sable
#

also this might be dumb to ask but why is the x in the denominator squared now

small bear
#

when we have sqrt(smth) / (-5) we can't put the minus sign inside

alpine sable
#

if it wasnt inside of the square root in the previous step

small bear
#

we can put objects inside the square root by squaring them (they are inverse functions)
5 = sqrt(5^2)

#

as an example

#

however -5 doesn't equal sqrt( (-5)^2)

#

let me write it out step by step what actually is happening (since I might be confusing you

ocean sealBOT
#

peaceGiant

small bear
#

so why am I telling you this?

#

well in your case you have x going to negative infinity