#help-0
1 messages · Page 789 of 1
That sounds so simple
May i post another question here? Or yall trying to solve this one
when it works it is
But later you’ll find cases where you have to do more steps of lhopitals to get there, or where it doesn’t work at all and you need to use other methods
Fun stuff
Math is so interesting 😂 i am just behind and all which i hate so much
there’s probably an integral here
I can’t remember how to do it though 
What if limit is an inf? I heard that when that happens, it is better to graph first…
this room being used?
no
if you see a question hasn't been asked for this amount of time it' spretty obviou
xD true, just being curtious
how do i get Ax and Ay out of this?
I know to get the magnitude its r=sqrtAx^2+Ay^2
but idk how to find Ax and Ay
Sine and cosine
Recall that sine is normally for y component and cosine is for x component
yes sorry just trying to understand lol
all good
That should help a lot
I cant open that on here 😦 im at work lol
my net is just barely able to do discord
and sometimes stops being abel to do that
That's explains everything vector wise
no
The components and angle
so to fibd Ax would I use sin(theta)=A
Is this right?
Guys I need help with something
Dont ask to ask
Yes, but don't interrupt next time
I’m so sorry
I saw a minecraft video with a waypoint set and I want to use triangulation to find out the coordinates of it
Not in this channel, ask in a different one
Recall that I said x component is cosine
Not sine
ask on a different channel for gods sake
😠
Y’all have no chill
Why
because it's too broad
It's not having no chill, it's the fact that you're interrupting
ITS NOT A STUDY QUESTION
There is currently someone here getting help
'how do I find the meaning of the universe'
I can show the screenshot it also has how many meters away it is
lmao
And the direction
im just gunna talk through him lol
ask on a minecraft server
Like they would know how to math
so it would be cos(theta)=A to find Ax?
Yes
if you direct message me your question with details I will help you
Yes
if it's over grade 11 I can't
The problem wants you to find Ax, Ay, Bx, and By then combine the components that are in the same axis, so Ax + Bx and Ay + By
Then find the resultant of that, using Pythagorean theorem
A^2+B^2=C^2?
Yes
Yes
ok, where does the theta a and b come in to play?
Magnitude is Pythagorean theorem
ive never seem those before
I'll give you how to do one component, and you handle the rest, okay?
$$A_x = A \cdot \cos(\theta_A)$$
cos\theta =364 I did that
Then fill in the values. If A = 364, and $\theta_a = 226.4$
dldh06
To get Ax, was that wrong?
dldh06
ok lemme do it real quick
Make sense?
dldh06
For Ax?
well i see that i didnt know the proper formula now lol
You can apply the same concept for Ay
And Bx and By
Except for B, you have a different angle and value to use
Compared to A
dam got it wrong lol
A_(x)=364cos(226.4\deg )
got -251
did i mess it up somewhere in there?
No that's right
If you can imagine, where is 226.4 degrees with respect to 0 degrees
Like which quadrant
quarant 1 or 3
226.6
positive
No
226.4? isnt that positive
im confused lol
yes
bottom left
the -251° made sense then in that respect but it came up wrong
If you drew the red vector along the x axis, it would be the blue vector, right?
im gunna say yes but im not really following why it would be dead set on the x axis
Because cos = adj/hyp
In relation to theta
si why would the x component be sitting directly on the axis?
wouldnt that make it 180° instead on -251°
why tho
that helped me alot with that concept
maybe youll find that particular cheat sheet helpful to
Also, please read the #rules and #❓how-to-get-help , because this channel is busy and you are interrupting. As well as don't ping people either
How do we know its cos = adj/hyp?
That red vector is not aligned along the x or y axis so you want to break it down into the x and y components, and those components will lie on the x axis and y axis
Because it's a trig function
That's the rule for cosine
adj/hyp
no like for this component
the x component
how do we know its this specific trig function
Look at the angle, determine which side is adj, opp, and hyp
Then determine the trig function
@dark granite I have 2 questions that im stuck at
Not in this channel, please
okso why did my answer not work for this problem them?
I did A_(x)=364cos(226.4\deg )
Because, it's not complete yet
Yeah I figured the sides that are adj, opp, and hyp im confused on why we are using cos?
Is the magnitude R?
-251 is not the final answer
Look at the angle, in relation to the sides
Determine trig function based on that
?
would the magnitude be sqrt Ax^2+Ay^2?
I'm confused
No
$$\sqrt{(Ax+Bx)^2+(Ay+By)^2}$$
dldh06
Everything is given in the diagram and with all the info I stated
ur re-stating the diagram information
i dont understand the diagram
It's a right triangle
the reason the COS is used
Look at the angle, if you want x, the side along x is adj
It's just finding the x and y components of A and B
doing it now, ill brb 😄 wish me luck haha
yeah so how do i know its not tan
Then summing the x components and y components, then Pythagorean theorem
Can you not read that diagram?
Find theta
tan(theta)=Oposite/adjacent
Find the x axis, what side is that in relation to theta?
You know it because thats how the trig function works, thats a great diagram to show it
ima save that haha
can any one help me in my work
Ask in #help-4
And you have the resultant, what side is the resultant?
whats resultant
dldh06
my hyp
So you just stated adj and hyp, what trig function?
how do u know its D
d isnt given in the diagram
Yes it is
$$\Delta d$$ is the side you are given
dldh06
any one tell
Don't ask here
why
Ask somewhere else
no
1000 x 0.20 = 200% profit
huhhhhh
where does it say im given that tho
1000 x 0.20 (0.20) is 20%
Ask in a different channel
The hyp
That's normally given
Trust me on that
You are given $\Delta d$ and you want the x and y components of that vector
dldh06
oh ur right
Does it all make sense now?
yesss
So all the confusion is gone?
WOOOOOOO! got it, 10 mins of math later
is these correct
Channel is busy
ty dl 😍
Can you not tell?
That's base on where you have the right angle
What exactly don't you get here?
Did that all make sense? On why you had to find the components of A and B then add them up?
It's basically breaking down the vectors in the components, then summing x direction and y direction, the magnitude of that value
Because you are given adj and opp
Look at the angle theta, determine the sides given based on that angle theta
Boat, i learned this around a month or two ago and its really all about your perspective on the triangle. when you know which side is hypontenuse, oposite, adjacent, then you can figure out which trig function to use
you look for the function that works with the sides that you know
tan would be oposite/adjecent
ohhh
do if you know the angle and the oposite then you would plug them in to solve for adjecent
so i use the givens to find out the unknown
Yes
tan(theta) is the angle
so if u know the oposite and adjacent u can plug them in and solve for theta
solve for degrees and itll tell you the angle
sorry to off topic, but how would I find resulting angle?
At this point I have 2 right triangles right?
would I have 2 different degrees?
What was (Ax + Bx) and (Ay + By)?
No, it's based off (Ax + Bx) and (Ay + By)
okay, what are you confused about?
There's a lot of messages here and I don't wanna read em all, so could you please catch me up to speed?
i was trying to help boat with that message 🙂
ahhh
what is even going on her
vector sums
hereyeah
But boat is confused on something
It’s one triangle
So since I got -156 for Ax+Bx would I then add 360 to make it positive?
No
I'm reading it rn
Negative sign helps determine quadrant for angle
Next Ay+By?
-473
@fast wave this is only a bunch of trig. Forget about vectors for a moment and just think about triangles
Does this diagram make sense to you?
Not really
-156 is Ax + Bx along the x axis
498 is the resultant/magnitude
-473 is Ay + By along the y axis
The negative sign helped me point in that direction
A little edit, just added -y and -x
yea
ok i get the negative part but where did the 498 come from?
That what the answer you got
The reason 498 points that direction is because it's between the x(green) and y(blue) vectors
Make sense so far?
yes
You want the angle now
How would you find the angle?
The angle of where 498 points
Im spitbaling and may be super far off here haha'
convert156 and 473 to radians and use say sin(theta)=-158/498?
Not exactly
dam
whys this negative
i ws so confident
This should help. You can do something called parallel shifting, meaning that a vector can be anywhere as long as you shift it parallel
what do you mean by "this"?
Notice how I shifted -473 to the left. That is valid
then the signs swapped and the
It's a parallel shift
S went to E
makes sense since its still on the y axis
It's not on the y axis but parallel to the y axis meaning still in the same direction as the y axis
There's theta, know what to do from here?
The values of -156, -473, and 498 are not angle measurements
ok brb! gunna run it see if i can get it 😄
In the problem you are given, they are unitless
Can anyone else help @fast wave <@&286206848099549185> ? I'm not really sure where the confusion is and they've already been helped by someone else and they're still lost.
Now be cautious when you get some angle result, because if you look, the magnitude vector is in the 3rd quadrant
wydm
Meaning that the angle is between 180 and 270 degrees
like the East to East?
So you have to make that result you get, fall between 180 and 270 degrees
alittle confused on that bit
take a vector and multiply each component of that vector by -1 and you'll get the same vector just pointing in the opposite direction
The yellow arrow, what quadrant is it in?
What is the range of angles in quadrant 3?
i didnt know they had a range per quadrant
i just learned what a quadrant was last week haha
im learning slowly but surely 😄
oooo nice, ima save that to
oof wat nvm angie was here ill move 😄
Guys whats 2x/3x =? (Fraction) in algebra
Im wondering if i did these correctly
Oh hi sorry im not sure
yep but simple math typo at b) 6/9 = 2/3
and a) did you approximate 4/9 as 0.4? you can actually leave it as 4/9 no worries
So i answeed correctly yes?
answer is not correct but your method is
is sin^2(x) the same as (sin(x))^2
yep
Ah i see thanks alot
sqrt(ab) should give you the geometric mean of a and b
what if i need to find per se 2 terms
since it would give me 1 term only if sqrt(ab)
and if i need 3, i would just find the 3rd term and do it again for 2 & 4
idk what you mean by per se 2 terms
If you mean how would you find the geometric mean of more than 2 terms, for n terms the geometric mean is the nth root of the product of all the terms
Im trying to find 2 geometric terms between 6 and 750
I have no idea what you're talking about, it might help if you post the exact problem you're working on
Insert 2 geometric means in the sequence between 6 and 750 this is all our professor gave
yeah its pretty confusing how he teaches shit
can u give an example?
the geometric mean of the numbers 3,4,5, and 6 is $\sqrt[4]{3 \cdot 4 \cdot 5 \cdot 6}$
Sneaky
its 4th root since theres 4 of them
If i 1223 of something and need to get to 2000 and i get a 1 point every 35 seconds and every 8 rounds i get 1 point on top of the other point how long would it take?
(15000 + 18000)/4 then simplify 15000:18000
its 5:6
then divide (15000 + 18000) by the sum of 5 and six
which is 11
yea looks like its correct
how does descartes rule of signs work for perfect square trinomials
anybody got an idea on how to do this?
Don't you think we need the full exercise ?
lol
well, there are a lot of implications to test, quite painful
(a) and (c) are equivalent
a seems to imply c for instance.
(d) implies (b) and (c) (and so (a))
a <-> c
d -> b and d -> c
b doesn't imply d nor c does
so the only left to check are b -> c and c -> b
if one implies the other, it's an equivalence as G and B have a symmetric role, so b->c is the only left to check, which ends the exercise
can you explain why
i don't understand how to use negations
like what is statement a implying
not(D(G, B)) means that G and B didn't dance together
ok
from here, (a) is equivalent to (c) is immediate, simple negation rule
and then you can start using common sense to check the others
ok thanks!
(for exemple, d means that noboby danced, so naturally implies b and c)
I'm having trouble solving the differential equation $$x''(t)=-\frac{k}{m}x(t)+\epsilon$$ where $k,m$ and $\epsilon$ are constants. I've tried a variation of parameters, but that hasn't worked either. Can anyone help me out?
WasMachenWirDennDa
it depends on the sign of k/m
k and m are both positive
I think it's the worst case lol
not yet, but to be honest I'm willing to do anything to solve this at this point
so go ahead
x'' + k/m x = e
as usual, you start by solving x'' + k/m x = 0
t² = -km so t = +- isqrt(km)
and so the general sol is c1 cos(sqrt(km)x)+c2 sin(sqrt(km)x)
and to this you sum a particular solution
yeah I got to that, and then when doing the variation of parameters you do $$x_P=u_1y_1 + u_2y_2$$ right?
WasMachenWirDennDa
you should check if there is a constant particular solution first
because there probably is
do you mean if $x(t)$ is constant?
WasMachenWirDennDa
thing is that wouldn't work with the problem it came from
it definitely gives a particular solution
the differential equation arises from a physics problem with a spring
so $x(t)$ definitely isn't constant
WasMachenWirDennDa
when you solve a diff equa, you solve the homogene for the general sol and you add a particular
here, x(t) = em/k should be a particular
but x(t) = em/k wouldn't correctly model the motion I'm trying to model with x(t)
x(t) is a function of the form c1 cos(sqrt(km)x)+c2 sin(sqrt(km)x) + em/k
any c1 and c2 give solutions here, so you need to understand the physics conditions of your physics problem
to know what coefficients are representative of your situation
you could check for initial situation
Can someone explain to me what I need to follow to solve this?
initially, x(0) = 0
and I also have 2 more points
ok I think I now what I gotta do now
I'll give it a shot and let you know
thanks 🙂
I'm confused with the question here
which part are you trying to do rn potato ?
it's the part i) to be precise
so the big union and big intersection means the combination of all elements inside the set right?
big union is all elements of all sets together
big intersection is all elements that are in all sets
I'll give you a hint for i)
Show that A_i is included in A_{i+1}
hmm lemme think about this
@alpine nacelle okay so if based on what you said, A_{i+1} doesn't cover the -i in the beginning and A_i doesn't cover the i in the end
is it correct here?
oh i thought because the i+1 so the elements got shifted to right by +1
all elements of A_i are in A_{i+1}
so what is in A_{i+1} that doesn't include in A_i then?
-i-1 and i+1
indeed
if A is included in B, what can you say about A union B ? and what about A inter B ?
since A is included in B, A U B means that it'll be B range only then right?
while intersection then it'll be only A range then since only those points intersect is it
indeed, now you can answer i) in one go
huh that's it?
(be careful: A included in B => A is the smallest)
yeah for the intersection right
oh crap
so what can you say about the big union ?
i just realized how dumb am i now kek
so the big union range starts from i = 1
so basically the range gonna be the entire thing then?
the big union is the union from all the sets A_1 to A_n
while the intersection gonna be from 1 to i
A_n including all the others, as we've shown
crap i didn't see the big picture lmao
okay i can imagine it now
thanks a lot melo
square it
x = 1 is the correct one still tho
if x = 1/2 you wouldn't get 2 it seems
I mean the sqrt (2x-1) - sqrt (2x-1) = 0 there already right
jhin
unless u wanna assume that only but infinite solution if u move the sqrt to other side
1/2 is a correct answer as well
hmm
it's because you sqrt'ed too soon
squaring both sides, we get 2x + 2sqrt(x²-2x+1) = 2
x+sqrt((x-1)²) = 1
note that the square is inside the square root
yes
so it has 2 sol
no, because sqrt takes only positive value in it, but here, even if x is negative, the square will make it positive
and the sqrt will be well defined
so that's the case you miss
because 1/2 - 1 < 0
For my 3 equations I got
E1: 3S + 7A + 2C = 3150
E2: S + A + C = 600
E3: A = 150 + C
Solving through though I get S = -50, A = 400, and C = 250, for obv reasons this is wrong because S can't be negative, does anyone know what I did wrong?
but gives a sol
oh yea absolute value
yeah
that what happens when you dont do math in the vacation
can relate lol
anyone?
E3 is A = 150+S
okay i got these 2
i think this one's easy to solve
just compare 2 equations it seems
you get the 10S + 2C = 2100 and 2S + C = 450
nvm it's worse
i get negatives even worse than him lmao
I think he'll be okay with solving the system, it probably was just his error with E3 which mislead him
yeah i think that's the only issue
i thiiiiiiiiiink i got it
S = 200, A = 350, and C = 50
is now what I have
is that right??
it's right
yeah it is now
awesome, ty!!!!!
you get 3150
okay melo
i think i still have 1 last question here
only this one's left in my unsolved question
i'm not that used to cartesian product so not sure how to simplify it
how do you call the set which A and B are subsets of ?
AUB?
nah, the set which contains A and A^c
from this, the only subset missing from the universal x universal is AxB
it's Universal x Universal \ {AxB}
I think so
now just how do i reach this point tho
that's the only question left
i do see the A B inside the equation
but i thought you can't swap the sets inside the cartesian product
Let's call this set C
no element from AxB is in C
yeah the only missing value
and no element from C is in AxB
these are disjoint
however, C union AxB is UxU
therefore, C = UxU - AxB
wow
so you just can't look at it directly
in the equation only
but look from what's not inside the equation instead right
you could also write C = (A^c x U) union (U x B^c)
oh right the difference set rule
Might be better for you to consider sketching
$x^2$, then $x^2-16$ then finally $\abs{x^2-16}$
ShatteredSunlight
I'm sure 2(x-4) is simple, but you could sketch that separately too
The + just means you combine the sketches
Combine the respective y-values at each point
That's basically what + means
You might want to find the exact $y$ at certain points of $x$ then connect the dots
ShatteredSunlight
I was gonna ask but you go first Melo
I was gonna help Syphax, but if he's fine, I can help you
Okay so don't fully remember my partial fractions from calc 2
but I think I'm mixing together 2 cases here
squaring and cubing is almost surely unnecessary
the square and cube part
Yesterday i did a problem where it was 1 over (s+ smth)^3 and then I had to do it like this
But if it's not "identical" terms do I just take them individually?
so without the cube and square
the goal is that in the end, the RHS has the same denominator as the LHS
Alright so no squaring ro cubing
for (ax+b)^k terms in the denominator, you're gonna need partial fractions of ax+b, (ax+b)^2, (ax+b)^3, ... up to (ax+b)^k, but when k=1 thats just ax+b
it's only for identical terms you go ^1 then ^2 ^3 etc?
x/(s+2)^2 would be A/(s+2) + B(s+2)^2? for example
okay good good, then I do know it, memory just needs some defrosting
take the first and 3rd equation minus each other
eliminate the y out
baiscally try to zone out 1 variable by minus 1 equation to another
if it's close but not enough, u can times the entire equation up
So try to find z for example, then you can use the value of z you know to solve x+z = smth for example
and when you have values for two variables you can find the third
or there's a cheat way
just use system of equation solver
if u r lazy to calculate and don't have to prove
I'm very used to calculate these with matrices I've gotten bad at doing it normally
lmao same
matrices makes everything faster ngl
but he's prolly in high skl
so i doubt he needs to use it
So I'm doing it manually and it might get messy with fractions
what year are you? @warped phoenix
junior in highschool
yeah
theres a lot of fractions regardless if i do elimination or substitution
i keep getting different answers
every method i try
x = 26, y= -3, z = 15
Let me try using a higher level math method and see what I get
that's what i get from calculator
then you can see which of your answers is the right one
sorry sleepy xd
yeah how abt no
gonna sleep after all the sets and theory lesson from melo xd
he helped me a lot
your local time?
I'm gonna go to, I think
Is there an easy way to test if your A B C for the partials are correct? @alpine nacelle
re-develop
i think you just have to map it on a graphing paper
i can already tell that A is the right angled one
since A and B both has 2 for the x coordinate and also B and C has 4 as their Z coordinate
You do need to map it in a graphing paper since it says "Show that A, B, abd C are ..."
Ohh
So I have to map it
You shouldn't have to
For the right angle gradient of one line is -1/gradient of other line if no sides r fully vertical/horizontal
If it’s vertical or horizontal either their x-coordinate key-coordinate are the same
isn't this determinant stuff?
Just these two things to take note of and u should be able to find the right angle easily if any
you could define the sides of the triangle as vectors and calculate the angle using the dot product
OK thanks everyone
i recently found this on discord, im just curious if anyone can solve it or if it's an actual thing?
Yes, it says you have to show that they are actually a right triangle
thank you!!!
sorry cant help with that :/
c o n f u s e d
thats real exciting math here
Not u lol
you can ask in the questions channels (not this one specifically) or #prealg-and-algebra
why isn’t this 5?
✨old annoying mathematician✨
cuz the numerator and the denominator are both inf
The numerator is approaching inf and the denominator is approaching negative inf?
-inf/inf = 1
5 + inf is still = inf
Ah I see thank you
and x/x = 1, x/-x = -1
Wow that’s confusing. I’m here to ask how to do long decision
*divisiln
*division
I forgot
go ahead
😃
?
Can I steal a quick question first
Wait but why is it 5 then if it approaches positive infinity?
Sure
no it's 5 + inf/ 1 - inf
if you have x = +- 2 then you'd factor it as (x+2)(x-2) right
Numerator is 5+infinity
How do you factor it when your x = -2 +- 3i
Incorrect notation, pls use parabolas
which then becomes inf/-inf
bruh alr (5+inf)/(1-inf)
Aight imma come back later this is too confusing
I get confused with the signs
Then my teacher is wrong
He is correct
It is x/-x=-1 but x is infinity
Oh for positive infinity it approaches 0
No?
yes it does approach to 0
1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16.....
the value gets lesser and lesser hence it approaches 0
$\lim _{x\to a}\left[\frac{f\left(x\right)}{g\left(x\right)}\right]=\frac{\lim _{x\to a}f\left(x\right)}{\lim _{x\to a}g\left(x\right)}$
Captain_Mat01
Just do that
if two variable x and y are said to be directly proportional to each other, then the following is true, x=ky where k is any real number
to expand on that, you basically know that
$m^2=k \cdot n^3$
and you can combine that with the information that m=4, n=2 satisifes the equation to find k
Omfish
so whats m? i got 23 but im almost sure i did it wrong @vapid oak
Did u find k
m and n are both variables in this situration.
no
U should
this question is basicallt saying $x^2=k \cdot y^3$
Omfish
ohh
okay this problem sucks ass
reverse transform to solve for y(t)
in 2018 his icome was 5% more than 2017, that's like saying 1.05 * 2017
if 2018 = x and 2017 is y
x = 1.05y
divide by 1.05 on both sides,
y = x/1.05
aka the 2018 income / 1.05
opposite
Hey! I need this help with quadratic polynomial
The question goes
p, q are roots of x^2-4x+2=0 then find p^2-q^2
i can find p+q and p.q
but how do i find p^2-q^2?
@jagged imp If i do (p+q)(p-q) here then i dont know the value of p-q
Do u know whether p>q?
i dont
just solve the equation and get the roots of x
x = +- smth and that's your p and q
There is no need for that
if they need the value yes
Use ur value of p+q to get p=value-q and sub into p² - q²
Value of sum and product of roots is sufficient
look up vietas formulas
Research on sum and product of roots of a quadratic equation
why not just solve it? it's an easy quadratic equation
Lol first u don’t get integer solutions and second solving the pair of simultaneous equations is faster
p = 2 -sqrt2
q = 2 +sqrt2
p+q = 4
p^2 - q^2 = 0
Math majors always want to complicate things when you can just do it in steps
It's different if they have to write the expressions and not just play with numbers
Birb
this is not true
really?
i just did the most unholy sin
||happens to the best of us||
(a+b)^2 != (a^2 + b^2)
okay then good
this worked
the final answer i got is 8root2
stuff like this is why I do engineering and not math
I want to play with my numbers no just write expressions all day
$8\sqrt{2}$
April's cat
Latex is fun!
sqrt{4}sqrt{4}sqrt{4}sqrt{2}
if you want to piss the grader off
$\sqrt{4}sqrt{4}sqrt{4}sqrt{2}
you don't need to write it off by heart, you have desmos where you can copy and paste equations to latex
xd
wow that looks so hard I would also hate my life if I got htat question
what grade is this
university year 2
oh damn you are smart
f_Y is the pdf of Y
so the idea for a is to find the pdf of y and use the formula for expected value on that
so do I first invert the function? x=lny?
so f_Y(y)=lny
and that would be the pdf?
I'm guessing by notation, as pdf usually uses the lowercase f?
can anyone confirm that this is allowed?
i don't thinks so but I'm no expert at that
yes it is allowed
was it like multiplication?
no i mean ok it is associative
ok thanks
need help
Im gonna go with probably
is that double factorial?
yeah that is > 0
oh ok that is a bit harder
then it should be < 1 right?
sry i mean this is < 1
or at least should be
oh wait
i read (2n+2)!! * (2n)!!
in the denominator
how did you get that?
<@&286206848099549185>
sry don't know anything about that
oh wait ok I'm sorry, i need more sleep haha
you're right
yup
My bad I didn’t read the previous message
NoRysq
meaning we would have: $(2n+1)!! \times (2n)!! > (2n+2)!! \times (2n-1)!!$
NoRysq
but now how would you go further
i thought we want it to converge?
and yes we don't know if the ineuqality is true and that is why we need to try and simplify
yeah
$(2n+1)!! = (2n+1) \times (2n-1) \times (2n-3) \times ... \times 3 \times 1 \
(2n)!! = (2n) \times (2n-2) \times ... \times 4 \times 2$
NoRysq
i think this is the key
Someone solve this please
$(2n+1)!! \times (2n)!! = (2n+1)!$
NoRysq
can you not interrupt @blissful sequoia
Sorry
@alpine sable
does this apply to all exact equations?
and it should be: $(2n+2)!! \times (2n-1) = \frac{(2n+2)!}{2n+1}$
NoRysq
Yes
so if it fails the test we wont be able to apply that right
and just use other methods
is it solved?
so actually you should get: $\frac{(2n+1)!! \times 2n!!}{(2n+2)!! \times (2n-1)!!} = \frac{(2n+1)!}{\frac{(2n+2)!}{2n+1}}$
i hope this is right
NoRysq
Yes, there are methods for non exact differential equations that have their own tests too
is there a name for that formula?
for the exact diff equations
or is it just that
it's just that as far as I know
exact diff equations only apply to the first order?
Yes
1st order and 1st degree?
what do you mean?
1st order and 1st degree diff equations
im trying to find 5 things to discuss about it
If by 1st degree you mean the exponent, it works for every degree
The method is for non linear ODEs
what does the O stand for
oh whut i thought exact diff equations use 2 partial functions
with respect to x and y
the method uses partial derivatives, but that doesn't mean the DE is not ordinary
$\dv{x}{t}+p(t)x=q(t)$ for example is an ODE cause it uses regular derivatives
Mosh
Non ordinary are multivariable
Maybe review DEs classification, or search about it so you can see it clearer
Oh, then don't worry you will learn about it in the next classes I guess
btw whats a homogenous differential equation
or is it better to search it in yt?
i just finished variable seperable a few days ago

homogeneous (probably wrong) is when you can do a sub and make it seperable iirc
Yeah maybe search a video about classification and homogeneous ODE
And have you studied homogeneous linear ODE before?
yup
linearity and the other classifications i just forgot
btw
maybe im stupid but why wont it apply to linear diff equations
is it because of the two kinds of variables in the diff equation
Basically, it's a classification for linear ODEs, a linear ODE is homogeneous when there are no terms that don't have a y or its derivatives
aight aihgt
What is 9 + 10?
so it will only apply to nonlinear diff equations right
My mom said it’s not 910
exact ODEs, yes
because linear diff equations only have one kind of function?
@alpine sable it should be 1
@alpine sable the form of expression is f(x)^g(x). Check rules for that forms. Or you can take log
taking log is probably easiest
since continuity rule will be applicable
has your teacher said "you must solve it this way"?
n^(2/n)=exp(2log(n)/n) in + infinity it's exp(0)=1
Someone please tell me the clue
@alpine sable do you need to find the limit or you need to show limit exist?
