#help-0
1 messages · Page 761 of 1
it doesn't have an inverse
Substitute value of one variable from one of the equations into other
but in this case both x and y variables have diff values so do i use lcm to make them same?
that sounds more like elimination
isolate one of the variables in one of the equations
if you're not sure which to pick, you can go with isolating x in equation 2 for this one
so 2x + 5x - 3y = 10 ?
I think the channel is occupied rn
Oh
Post at #geometry-and-trigonometry
no, that is not at all what i said to do and also this is bullshit
Btw that's wrong
You want to either substitute out x or y
Eg 5x = 3y - 1
chill i was sick for some classes and i have an exam coming up so i missed some concepts 😭
What grade is this?
8th
when i call something bullshit it's not to express anger
it's to express that it is bullshit
let me be more clear
i want you to take the second equation and solve it for x
2x = 10 - 4y?
Can just do x = 5 - 2y
got it ty
is "True" supposed to be your answer?
Note the answer to 1 is indeed false, but your reasoning is wrong. It's asking if A is a subset of B.
I don't know how we can expand on "true" for #3
.
the n=1 term should be positive?
I'm struggling with this lol
1/2 - 1/4 + 1/8 - 1/16 ... is (1/2 + 1/8 + 1/32)- (1/4 +1/16 ....)
can i see what you are doing?
yea ive done this step
the first infite series is (1/2)/(1-1/4) = 2/3
the second infinite series is (1/4)/(1- 1/4) = 1/3
so yeah it should be 1/3
I did it and got log3/3
Bruh
ANYONE KNOWS BOUT EQUATION OF STRAIGHT LINES
._.
.
R u using formula for infinite geometric series ?
nope
.
i think its 1/3 log 3
for this one it does not uses the sigma notation thingy
yea the ans is 1/3log3
oh thought u said root 3
ow i wrong type i said log3root3
the formula is a/(1-r)
...
no. For a geometric series a, ar, ar^2, ar^3 .... the sum is a/(1-r)
oh i got it, thanks jacobp
no problem. this is my first time helping someone out
paste question?
I wish there was someone who could give me a lesosn on differnetial equations
Keep in mind that -1<r<1
the geometric series formula applies to any r between -1 and 1, not just between 0 and 1.
Square brackets means it includes zero
lol mb i read it wrong
Also, as a tip, you don't have to delete the question you asked. Other people could have had a similar question like you. One of the main times you should delete a post is if you multi-post in multiple channels
o ok srry i wont next time
a man has to reach a flagpost 10m away from him. He travels 1m, then travels 1/2m and keeps on travelling half the previous distance. At this rate, how long will it take him to reach the flagpost? (it takes him 1s to travel 1m, 1/2s to travel 1/2m and so on.)
Ok, so you're adding 1 + 1/2 + 1/4 ... What type of series is this?
umm.....geometric?
I think they mean if it's either a series that converges or diverges
No I meant this
oh.
Because you know the type of the series, do you know the formula for the nth term and/or the sum of the first n terms?
Start with the formula for just the nth term
i actually haven't really studied series...i just came across this problem in a book 😅😅
so can u pls explain how to solve...
i may be wrong but wont it just take 10 seconds as his speed is constant at 1 m/s @uncut tapir
First find a formula for the nth term of the series
Then find a formula for the sum of the first n terms
Then take the limit of the sum of the first n terms to infinity
can someone explain what aRb means?
This seems correct as well. Wondering what the purpose of the question is
no but like, he travelling in a certain manner right? it is like that zeno's achilles paradox...
is it 1/2?
Yeah I guess the idea is to demonstrate the series converges and refute the paradox
That's correct
lol
@uncut tapir , what is (n-1)? bcuz isn't n infinity?
This is just the nth term
shouldnt the sum formula be used here
That's the next step to derive the sum formula from the nth term
a=1, r=1/2 so, an will be (1/2)^n-1 right? so what is 1/2^n-1?
we havent been given the nth term weve just been given the sum
ok so, what will be the next step?
i mean im lost as well
Gaunter
what...is...'k'? 😅
We don't need useless comments from the peanut gallery. If you don't get it, just watch
It's just an index for the summation
alright
oh yes...yeah...
this problem is much more complex than i thought 😅😅
Gaunter
If you want a hint, try to solve this for S_n
uhh...hehe😅😅thanks...though this mathematics(summation and series) hasn't been taught to me now...so...i didn't quite get it but anyways thanks...
find a where the function is differentiable for all x values \
\ $g(x)$ = \begin{cases}$ $ax$, & \text{if $x < 0$} \ $x^2 - 3x$, &\text{if $x \ge 0$} \end{cases}
sevenseas
find a where the function is differentiable for all x values \\
\\ $g(x)$ = \begin{cases}$ $ax$, & \text{if $x < 0$} \\ $x^2 - 3x$, &\text{if $x \ge 0$} \end{cases}
```Compilation error:```! Missing $ inserted.
<inserted text>
$
l.56 \\ $g(x)$ = \begin{cases}
$ $ax$, & \text{if $x < 0$} \\ $x^2 - 3x$, &\t...
I've inserted a begin-math/end-math symbol since I think
you left one out. Proceed, with fingers crossed.```
is this 0?
cuz the limit x^2 - 3x when x tends to 0+ is 0
and for a function to be differentiable, the limit of g(x) when x tends to 0- and 0+ has to = L, 0?
sry idk where the latex has gone wrong
Yeah I guess it would have to be
i think the ans is -3 tho
i think they differentiate x^2 - 3x
im abit confuse here do we differentiate or find the limits here
What's the slope at x = 0 for x² - 3x?
The slope should be the same at x = 0 for ax.
If the slopes differ, then you can't get the derivative at zero.
@dense blaze
-3
ohh
im confuse when to use limits or derivative
can i ask here, does differentiability means the function has to be continuous?
Differentiability means that you can get the derivative at all points.
The derivative for the linear and quadratic parts are fine outside of x = 0.
Where they meet.
oh i see its nth to do with continuity?
If the slopes of both parts don't match, then the derivative can't be gotten since the derivative limit will be different on the left and right.
And a limit doesn't exist when the left and right limits differ.
Find derivate and sub in x = 0
So therefore the derivative doesn't exist.
So make the derivatives of both parts match so that the left derivative limit and the right derivative limit match.
Does that make sense?
Continuity is somewhat important, but not for this problem.
You need removable discontinuities and the rest continuous for it to be differentiable, but that's not a problem here.
yeah i see this makes sense, i think i keep getting confused limit at a point vs using limit to get the derivative
The piecewise function parts are all continuous and they meet at the same point (0, 0), so the whole thing is continuous.
ah okay ic thank u
Oh, I was slightly wrong. Looked it up and removable discontinuities aren't differentiable at the discontinuity.
So, yes, continuity is required, but not sufficient.
You're welcome.
hi guys does anyone know how to solve this
@hollow pelican Use the constant multiplier rule to get 5 out of the derivative.
Then use the chain rule.
what's constant multplier rule?
d/dx(a*f(x)) = a * d/dx(f(x))
ok
Here, derivative of 5 cos(2t³) = 5 times derivative of cos(2t³).
I suggest using parenthesis after sin, cos and other functions
You need to keep track of what's left to be differentiated.
See how the 5 doesn't go inside the cosine?
It goes out of the part that still needs to be differentiated.
There's another way that people write it, too.
y' = (5 cos(2t³))'
Where instead of d(part to be differentiated), it's (part to be differentiated)'
ohhh
So, you can pick either way.
You need to write y = 5cosu and u= 2t^3 (correct so far)
First mistake is you wrote dy/dx instead of dy/du and du/dx should be du/dt.
You do multiply dy/du and du/dt like you did at the end but you are missing some terms. It should be
-5sin(u)(6t^2)
Write in polar form:
(Cos(1/2)-i*sin(1/2))^2
How should I think about the angle in this case?
Hello, sin(x) is an odd function, so -sin(x) = sin(-x)
Also, cos(x) is an even function, so cos(x) = cos(-x)
Thanks but I'm still not sure how to think of the angle. I understand that i could write it as
(cos(-1)+i*sin(-1))^2
but not sure how to think of the angle as an integer.
It's (cos(-1/2)+i*sin(-1/2))^2, so the angle is -1/2 rad
(e^(-1/2*i))^2
Angle does not matter. When you write pi/2 or pi as angle it actually means 1.52 or 3.14 rad respectively
Thank you :)
380 * pi * 80 cms
hehe
What does the [-10^-5, 10^-50 by [-10^-3, -10^-3] mean?
That's like the x and y axis of the graph
The x axis goes from -10^-5 to 10^-5 and the y goes from -10^-3 to 10^33
is there a way to show this on the graph or do u just assume it?
got it thx
Assuming value of cos is known
U can calculate sin with the help of basic relation between sin and cos
sorry i can't get it
how can u calculate it ?
U know the relation between sin and cos ?
U have value of cos
So u can calculate sin
cos(pi/2 - x) =sinx ?
sin and cos of the same angles
Here pi/2-x and x are two different angles
sin^2 +cos^2 =1 ?
Dump the value of cos in the eqn
Let me try
ohhhhh i;m so dumb, ty very much 
👍
DO=OC=OE
i need to find whats DO+OC+OE
can someone help?
I think u mean OC instead of DC
oh yes my bad
Yeah otherwise that would be impossible
ok i changed it do you know the answer?
Yes, the area of the three shapes inside the square have to be equal to 64. You can write all the areas in terms of OE and solve
Assuming angle OEB is 90°
I tried it doesn't get solved that way the x terms get cancelled out
Maybe cosine formula will work?
ODC is an isocoles maybe we can take advantage of that?
Yea we can use some trig here
Not sure how it helps but it must be relevant otherwise they wouldn't have side all those sides are equal
Right, we don't know the DOC angle
I get the same answer if I try Pythagoras
Well this clicked to me first so I tried this
But yes Pythagoras theorum will give same result
i dont have it
Ok no prob
But the answer is probably 15 only
You can do Pythagoras on the top triangle if you split it in half
thats what i got too when i assumed its 90° but we cant really know that
Actually I think you can
can you explain how i need the asnwer
DO and OC are equal so O has to be exactly halfway between them both horizontally
You should be able to 'drag' O to where E is without breaking the DO = OC rule
OE would have to be perpendicular
And the path will be locus of a perpendicular to AB
Exactly
Nice dude! I was having some problem deciphering this one
i mean, can i do it like in a test or something?
I guess you can check your answer by making sure the areas sum to what they're supposed to
Yeah this one is also a way to check this
If the areas are same then the assumption of OEB being right angle is correct
Formally speaking, the point O has to be on the locus which bisects DC and AB
And the only way OE can equal DO and CO is if E also exists on the locus
so that means E is a right angle?
is this correct?
Yes
is this an artificial intelligence? WoW
what
uhhhhhhhhh
if im given 2 r3 lines that are skew
and at some point there is a minimum distance between the two
how do i find where the minimum distance is?
i've figured out how to find the orientation and the length of the minimum distance (orientation with the cross product, length with the scalar projection)
but i still have no idea how to find rthe actual minimum location without bashing it into the distance formula and praying
(spoiler the algebra did not work out to something i could solve)

I'm genuinely amazed this server doesn't auto delete invite links
<@&268886789983436800>

b&
you have a band?
does it have more than one linear factor (that's real)?
I wasn't able to find the other 2 real linear factors
so I graphed it
and yeah
only 1 real root therefore only one real linear factor
yes
presumably you were expected to use rational root theorem to find it, which they call sometime else?
what
to find -1/2
are there any other real roots other than the one they gave us?
no
I don't understand what it means
it's asking for the possible roots
what
there aren't any possible real roots other than the one they gave
I proved that
according to the rational root theorem those are all possible roots but I also don't think that's what they want
hmm
I don't get this
it doesn't have any other real linear factors
only the one they gave us (which isn't an option
(you need to select one to submit
yeah... and?
you'll have a linear factor and an irreducible quadratic factor if you were to factorize the cubic
yeah I got that
however what you found is that x=-1/2 is a root of the cubic
they're asking for another linear factor right here though @glass lichen
yes
well it says a
Yeah
and since it only has one, it's the linear factor
I just saw
why can you let p2 = 0?
i did this but I set p1 = 0 and got a different result for the solution to the solution
linear algebra: first order 2 variable DE
In this section we will solve systems of two linear differential equations in which the eigenvalues are real repeated (double in this case) numbers. This will include deriving a second linearly independent solution that we will need to form the general solution to the system. We will also show how to sketch phase portraits associated with real...
You can have p2 to be anything, in this case, zero was picked because it made it the most simpliest
The overall concept is to not have an eigenvector to be the zero vector
i did this but i let p1 = 0
so then I got a different solution. Is that solution also valid?
6.2801e-8 , what does the e mean ?
How did you let p1 = 0? There's no p1
6.2801x10^-8
-0 ?
6.2801e-8 = 6.2801*10 -8 ?
First, rule don't ask in a busy channel, and that's calculator notation for $$10^x$$
dldh06
$$6.2801E-8 = 6.2801*10^{-8}$$
dldh06
1/2 p1 + 3/2 p2 =-3
you can say p2 = 2 - 1/3 p1
then you get vector ( p1 , 2 - 1/3 p1)
let p1 = 0 => vector is (0 , 2)
or you can say p1 = 6 - 2 p2, which is what paul did and got (-6 , 0)
So you solved for p2 instead
yeah
and then my solution for the coefficients to the solution was different too
and so all in all, a different solution
uwu then
a water container has 13 900 mool of water, how many water molecule does the container have?
This channel is busy
What are you confused about, you can solve for either p1 or p2 and get valid answers
Isn't this chemistry?
Math
6.02 × 10^23 molecules/mole
Can we agree this is chemistry though?
Or am I crazy
It is
Ok, good
it doesnt matter…
Yeah, I know but I had a doubt for a second
It kind of does because you wouldn't be able to solve without the chemistry knowledge
You can't solve it without knowledge of math
It's just basic conversion
Use this constant from the given chemistry context to solve the maths problem
idk how thats why im asking
Arithmetic question. Integers include zero, natural numbers, and their negatives. Do natural numbers include zero or just positive whole numbers?
Use fractions
You have molecules/mole and the number of moles given. Can you find a formula to find molecules?
I cannot
This is a definition/convention question, there is no 'right answer'
Like if I wanted to covert 3.45 meters to kilometers, $$\frac{1 m}{1} * \frac{1 km}{1000 m}$$
dldh06
Thanks.
Notice how the units in the denominator and numerator cancel out and km is left
6,022 * 10^23 / 13900?
The units of that would be molecules/mol^2
$$\frac{13 900 {mol of H_2O}}{1} * \frac{something}{something}$$
tex hated that XD
Maybe space render it?
Meh its fine
As it is
Try text{}?
dldh06
Whatever
XD
That says mol of water
$$\frac{13 900 \text{ mol of } H_2O}{1} * \frac{something}{something}$$
Fill out the something part
Gaunter
Ah, that looks nice
Thanks
g per mol
H2O is 18 or smth
This is the original question
Oh sorry
Relax, he was just trying to help out
6,022 * 10^23 / 13900 * 10^4
I thought this was chill and you asked the question... 🤦
I'm too tired
Ohhhh
maxwell equations
Yes
I like these equations
Can you see if you divide those numbers you would get the wrong units? Since you are doing
$$\frac{molecules}{mol}•\frac{1}{mol}$$
Gaunter
yes
How do you use the bot
$$2+2$$
What
Alex_
$$2+2$$
You need to do the opposite
$2+2$
Moosey
It's LaTeX
You need to take a latex course XD
$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^{n}}{n!}$
hmm
Alex_
What
$$\Sigma$$
LaTeX is a high-quality typesetting system; it includes features designed for the production of technical and scientific documentation. LaTeX is the de facto standard for the communication and publication of scientific documents. #LaTeX is available as free software.
⭐ Table of Content ⭐
(0:00) Just Enough LaTeX to Survive - 01 - Introducti...
$$\sigma F=mv$$
Alex_
Check this out @alpine sable
Capital S
Moosey
Also, if you wanted to test latex, use #latex-testing
Alex_
Alex_
Bruh
opposite doesnt work
Use #latex-testing and Google commands
$$2\cos \frac{\pi}{9}, 2\cos \frac{7\pi}{9}, 2\cos \frac{13\pi}{9}$$
dldh06
There
$$3$$
Alex_
lol
What is your question Alex?
?
Use #latex-testing
Ok
Btw, I forgot to ask, how does one get the helper role?
You can message the ModMail bot and ask
Okay 🙂
This channel is for asking questions.
What fraction method did i have to use for the mole stuff?
Conversions
Can you show the thingy
this?
Just plug in the stuff that makes the units cancel and you're left with what you want
hi
hi
i from brazil, and i want study english
idk if this is the best spot
it's ok
Do you recommend any courses to study English?
i really don't know i guess just try to find some good online tutorials and lessons?
Maybe a math help channel isn't the best best place to ask these kind of questions?
You could go to #book-recommendations Though, I am sure people would help u 🙂
Ok lemme see
uuwl, sorry
uwu
Its ok 🙂
@tame stag
Just plug the points given on the graph
-4
Is at x=-4 on the graph
Then range goes from 0 to 4
including both 0 and 4
ohh ok
im guessing the domain should be the possible x values for a function f(x), and the range will be the results from that function (y). So the x coordinates of the points should be within the domain: -4 <= x <= 2. And the range would be the set of y values, within 0 <= y <= 4
idk
ty 😭👌
i got it 😌🤚
i just realzied what an idiot i am
anyways
ill get going thx
If the determinant is 0, is the area of a transverse vector a and vector a 0 when it's a parallelogram?
I think the area is 0 then because tje determinant=area of a parallelogram and if if the determinant is 0 then the area is 0 and it's a zero vector
any ideas on how to prove this 😦
nvm
hello, doing linear algebra. I was asked to do a 3x3 lower triangular skew symmetric
I don't understand why its all zero's and not 1's in the diagonal
<@&286206848099549185>
If you had 1's on the diagonal, it'd be symmetric not skew symmetric
@crisp quest
since you'd have $I_3^T=I_3$
Mosh
oh ya because on the skew symmetric.. the diagonal must all be different?
Skew symmetric means that $M^T=-M$
Mosh
or no the symmetric
let me think about it
i transferred into the class today
this is me catching up on last weeks stuff
Basically you have 3 parts to consider: the lower triangle, the diagonal, and the upper triangle
yes so if its a lower triangular
you need 0's in the top right
and if its symmetric you have to do the lower side
yes
oh yeah, I got it backwards, yes you need $m_{12},m_{13},m_{23}=0$ for lower trianglular
Mosh
but then since you need skew symmetry, you also need it to be upper triangluar
so that means everything off the diagonal is 0
then for skew symmetry, you need the entries on the diagonal to be their own negatives
so $m_{11}=-m_{11}, m_{22}=-m_{22},m_{33}=-m_{33}$
Mosh
but that's only true for 0
ok
also like normal, $M=[m_{ij}]$ if you're confused by the notation I used
Mosh
41795-2123
our teacher in class used it once today
but, he didn't really use it on the youtube lectures
Yeah it just means the (i,j)th entry of the matrix is $m_{ij}$
so maybe he did it more last week when i wasnt in the class
Mosh
so the entry in row i column j is m_{ij}
are there functions that only have a horizontal asymptote on one side? Also, is there a function with a horizontal asymptote on both sides but is crossed in the middle?
e^x
yes to both
I know one just cant remember the exact eqn
,w graph y=x/(1+x^2)
shit graph
lol
Mosh
Cool
has a HA of y=0 but root of the origin
what does the symbol in the middle mean
Greater than or equal to.
thanks
No problem.
I'm on this question here and the step is saying to cross multiply, how do I go about this?
they mean get a common denominator and combine the fractions on the LHS
How does that lead to this?
I see how they have the same denominator, but idk how we've gotten there
Shouldn't the 2Tan(2A) be in there somehwere?
Oh I am such an idiot, don't worry Mosh, thank you!
https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Transformations#:~:text=Because vectors are,and 3D space.
im a bit confused on this part
what does it mean by "position vectors"
are they different from normal vectors?
Learn OpenGL . com provides good and clear modern 3.3+ OpenGL tutorials with clear examples. A great resource to learn modern OpenGL aimed at beginners.
It says on the page. A vector on it's own describes a direction and magnitude. A position vector describes a point from the origin vector with its direction and magnitude
so a position vector points towards a point?
Yes
ah okay
Base case: Setting $n = 1$ yields $1^3 = 1 = 1^2$.\par
Induction step: Take $n \in \N$ and suppose that $\boldsymbol{\sum^n_{i=1}}i^3 = (\boldsymbol{\sum^{n}{i=1}}i)^2$. Then \begin{align*}
\boldsymbol{\sum^n{i=1}}i^3+(n+1)^3 & = \left(\boldsymbol{\sum^{n}_{i=1}}i\right)^2 + (n+1)^2(n+1)\
& =
\end{align*}
sanjay
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
I have this but I can't find a way to get the LHS to $\left(\sum^{n+1}_{i=1}i\right)^2$
sanjay
what do the R and the E symbols mean?
in R(eal numbers)
Remember what you are supposing
what does the E mean?
You can transform Σi³ into (Σi)² freely
When the top is n
well yeah
Or wait, that's what you've done, isn't it?
sanjay
but I need this
I remember you need to do
Σi = n(n+1)/2
I didn't
look one thing
(1+...+n)^2
when doing the induction step
we also can get to (2+...+2n)^2
but I don't know if this will help
Are you saying that
(Σ i)² = (Σ 2i)²?
You've made a mistake somewhere
I mean we would need to reach (1+...+n+(n+1))^2
but its wrong indeed
I see that formula now
this
wow this simplied so much
(n(n+1)/2)^2
thanks man
Np, glad it worked out!
hi i need a bit of help on this
im a bit confused, what does it mean by apply the definition of periodic function?
It means "Use your unit circle"
ohhh i see ok thank you very much
Or, it means "you can lower this by 2π and it won't change the answer"
the step before told me to break it down into 6pi+ pi, so do i break it down further?
No, that's a good way to break it
ah ic, im just not sure what to do for this second step
Because 6π won't change anything, so it turns into cos(π)
can someone help me on a question with my hw
it gors like this
What type of function is indicated by the following equation? 4x + 5y = 20
ohh i see so its just cos pi?
Beautifully done
pls help i have a test tmrw
Linear
yes but how do i find out if it is linear or not
is there a equation describing a cylinder? For example in the case of a sphere, the sphere is the set of all points whose distance from the center of the sphere is equal to it radius. given a point in R^3 I can determine if the point is on the surface or not. So I am looking for something similar for a cyclinder.
Being able to freely rotate any cylinder makes this problem vague. Give me 3 points and I can likely match some cylinder to them
(rcosθ, rsinθ, c)
Describes an upright cylinder
Or use cylindrical coordinates?
(z, r, theta)
I am describing the cylinder with a center position, a radius, and height. I tried the cylindrical coordinates look for any sort of relationship between a point on the cyclinder, and the given quantities I have.
(rcosθ + p1, rsinθ + p2, c)
Allows you to move the center to (p1, p2)
You can describe a cylinder as a locus of all points at a fixed distance r along a central axis of length z I guess
Maybe that would help ?
that helps I look into it.
The answer was x+1?
Seems like it would. In your example a sphere is also a locus but from a fixed point not a fixed line
yes, that's f(x) for x<4
oh sorry I thought you were giving me an answer
???
where would you get that idea from?
"is it right?"
"no, it's not even a function"
sorry im not very smart

Is this explanation true
for the x component i have a similar one but instead of mg sin(theta) i have
mg / (sin theta)
Similarly with the cos as well
Why would you do mg/sin(theta)
can i get help here or is this active
because my math thing is easy for u probs
like
im dumb
You've posted the same question in multiple channels you don't need to post here as well
;)
@uncut tapir so if you were to find the force x pushing the Fn
it would be sin(theta) = O/H
in which O is mg
and H is the Force x you want to find
and since you want to make H to variable
you wouls move the mg to make the lefthand side become mg/ sin(theta)
And then you can find the net force of it going down to be ma which would be H - Fr
Where you went wrong is actually H is mg
Theta is the angle between the normal and the direction mg acts
Also the hypotenuse represents the longest side. You would be saying a force greater than its own weight pulls it downwards which would be impossible
In mechanics the normal is a direction perpendicular to the surface
Like just think about it physically. If you lie down flat there is 0 weight horizontally meaning it's impossible for the force of your weight to move you in any direction
Then friction always acts opposite and parallel to the direction you travel
but this is not horizontally this is occuring diagonally
So the weight would have an effect when it would pull the object downwards
Yes that's my point. It does have an effect but not the full effect
yeah, but then this is what i'm calculating
I was able to think of a part of the solution thx to that. Realizing I wanted orientation I introduced a normal vector, and letting the center position be the center position of the base of the cyclinder. With the normal vector n, center position c, and any point x on the cyclinder in R^3, I check if the dot product between the vector x-c, and n is greater than or equal zero will guareentee does point are in view of c. Only problem is introducing the radius of the cyclinder to the equation.
@uncut tapir But why would you use the theta the normal and the downwards force
You would only use it to find the Normal force
The idea is you resolve forces in two directions. Parallel to the surface and along the normal
I get that, but then how can we find the force pulling it downwards the slope
The magnitude of the normal vector would have to equal r right?
no the normal would be at that the center position of the base.
I wish I can draw a diagram for this
to post here
It would be mgsin(theta)
so you are using the theta between the downwards force and the normal
Yes
Isn't that finding Normal force
The normal would be cos theta
What, it can't be
If you were using sin(theta) right
it would be sin(theta) = O/H
in which O = mg
and what are you trying to find?
the mising variable that is unkown is H
therefore you would be finding h
And H is not an x component since you can see the legend of the y and x axis here
This is using theta between the normal and the downwards force
That's exactly right. H isn't an x component
H is mg, O is the x component
Found a solution
Is this the theta from between the normal and the downwards force
kind of
You can't make H mg, because gravity only effects the system vertically
and not merely the model is bending gravity
The hypotenuse is the vertical line
Wouldn't the hyptonuse be the slant line
Nope. The diagram is drawn badly I'll admit
Theta should actually be in the top corner of the triangle
how can the slant be lower than the vertical line
what is this i need help
All slants within a right triangle are the largest values
ask away
#34. Evaluate 7x2x7x5 using properties of numbers. Name the property used in each step
btw the properties is one of these or more reflexive, symmetric, transitive, additive identity, additive inverse, multicativ identity, multiplicative idenity, multiplicative properity of 0, associative, comutative, distributive
The side opposite the 90° angle is
yes
pls?
then why wouldn't you make H be the mg / sin(theta)
i dont understand
me either
dats y i came here
7x2x7x5 = 14 x 7 x 5 = 98 x 5 = 490
i need properties, not 490
i already know dat
I dont know, maybe associative ?
Forget about the trig for a moment. You are trying to create a triangle with the normal, the direction of the slope and a vertical line. The slope and the normal are perpendicular by definition which means the vertical line is the hypotenuse
i need step by step properties
i think it is commutative
This question is not very well defined
the text book isnt defined
textbook be wiered af
which step are we taking to evaluate this
idk
You need to help us help you. What kind of answer are you looking for?
@uncut tapir So you are trying to make a right angle with the normal and the x axes?
PLS
Yes exactly
the question doesnt say
@uncut tapir What would theta be in the new triangle?
It would still be theta. It's kind of a long proof but you're expected to just treat it as a given fact for mechanics
Wouldn't this be using corresponding angles or something
@uncut tapir Also is this theta
Okay so this is using corresponding angles to find theta
I thought theta would be between the hyptonuses and C to D
I mean between B to D and C to D
The diagram is drawn badly
You don't have to prove the two given angles are equal for every question like I said it's just considered a given
Thanks, I understand now
Why have you got 4 solutions
isnt it two points only
But this is a linear function and a quadratic? Function. At most you should have 2 solutions
But how would I pick which points to be the solution? Is it just on a certain axis
look at the points of intersection
Yes
ye
@uncut tapir I still don't get how you would find the x component using the angle between the normal and the downward's force
i need a refresher on logs
Refer to this diagram. The weight is the hypotenuse. You want the force acting along the opposite
1 is 5 i think
That's the first term
differs from 5 for each term
You don't need the common difference
not sure what you mean by common difference
that isnt necessary for solving arithmetic series
Oh I must have misunderstood something
Did they go over the famous story of adding the numbers 1 to 100?
Nope
Gauss noticed that 1 + 100 = 101, 2 + 99 = 101, ... and reasoned there are 50 such pairs which add to 101. So the answer was 50 * 101 = 5050
You basically just apply the same idea here
Up quick question what is recursive and explicit formulas don’t understand them yet
am i allowed to ping helper since its been 15min
literally just joined the server so idk how stuff works here
<@&286206848099549185>
For a list of rules about asking on this server, please see #❓how-to-get-help.
youre fine to ping helpers
ok
I finally arrived at a solution I been working on for a while. Leaving it here for anyone who might experience the same problem as me. I tried to be clear as much as possible
Someone pinged me on this channel
But idk who
Check mentions
Can someone explain the trick to this question?
I tried to set the two equations equal to each other, but I know there's a simpler way to do it
I've already done part A, I just need help understand part B. Thanks!
g(x) can be described as f(x) flipped over then moved up 10
so if you want it to be in the same place you need f(x) = 5, cuz it flips to -5, then moves up 10 back to 5
@cinder shard I assume your setting equal to each other worked too?
I'm getting kind of a complex answer
(-6 +- root 84)/2
Assuming I use the positive value since this is for a practice SAT and u can only input positive values @ionic jewel
Is the answer 2 @cinder shard?
the answers should be a little less than 1 and a little more than 7
my work
but as u can see, there must be a simpler and more time efficient way to do this, especially because 84 isn't a perfect root
is it 2?
idk
brain is too fried to come up with what root 84 equals
Not exactly what bunny predicted so im assuming i did it wrong
yeah it's much simpler
,calc sqrt(10)+4
Result:
7.1622776601684
so essentially, you're trying to find a value for x when the two equations equal each other
so, you're going to equate the two equations and solve for x
that much I know, but there should be an easier way to do this
it also doesn't tell me to round
so I'm kinda suspicious if it isn't a whole number
thanks for the explanation
I didn't cross out the 10's and that made it harder for me
oh haha, that'll do it
I tried to multiply everything by -2 to get rid of the fraction, but it just made it more complicated
yeah, typically SAT questions don't require that much work
it's mostly just understanding concepts rather than doing hard maths
yeah thanks for the help
np 😄
kinda confused, the positive part of the graph is above the X line but that looks right
@feral crypt that's wrong
oh
god
no ur right
i coulda sworn it said g(x) = -f(x) + 10
quick question
can a form still be called a quadratic function even if it has 2 squared exponents?
you mean like this (x-a)^2(x-a)^2
yep
nope then it becomes a quartic
oh alright, thanks!
nws
still need help with thi
How
these look like questions from a test
On mobile its in the search button at the middle bottom of the screen
nopeee just an assignment
so it's homework. okay.
yup
i would appreciate if you re-uploaded those pictures so that they're right-side-up
not really i’m kinda new to the chapter so it’s confusing
so you're unfamiliar with the basic trig ratios?
i.e. sin, cos and tan
and what they represent in the context of right triangles
i know some of it
like i get the basic idea but i just get confused when it comes to questions
well here we have a right triangle where one side is known to be 16cm, another side is unknown, and the third side is not labeled at all
we are also given that tan(θ) = 4/3
tan(θ) is the ratio of two of the sides. which ones?
incorrect
WAIT WHAT
you are saying x = 12, yes?
yup
yeah, no, that's wrong.
wait so how do i do it
and it should be painfully obvious that the side labeled x is longer than 16
