#help-0
1 messages · Page 751 of 1
@wanton shard Sorry, channel is busy.
oh ok ok mb
How far away is that?
is 11:00 for me
x=12
Right.
it becomes that cuz the zero is not there anymore
Anything plus zero is that number.
yes
wait what
x + 6y = 12
x + 6y = 12
6y =12
Good.
y=2
OK, so the y intercept is (0, 2)
So, two points are (0, 2) and (12, 0).
Now another point on that line will be halfway between them.
So, what's halfway between their x coordinates?
ok
So, what's halfway between their x coordinates?
my friend got (2,5)
OK.
Now another point on that line will be halfway between them.
So, what's halfway between their x coordinates?
(12,0)
im not sure
What's their average?
who?
OK, add them together and divide by 2.
add what together??
12 and 0.
6
Do you see how 6 is halfway between 12 and 0?
yes
OK, what's halfway between their y coordinates?
ok thats it?
OK. Let's go back to a minute ago.
I said to mark the y intercept.
Did you mark the y intercept?
is it 12,0
No.
The y intercept is on the y axis.
Where x is 0.
That point has x as 12.
So, that's not the y intercept.
What is the y intercept?
6
yes
What are the two intercepts you got?
0,2
yes i did
yes
Yes.
so im good?
yea
OK, you need some practice with order of operations. You don't have to do it right now, but here's some video lessons and practice problems: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/cc-sixth-grade-math/cc-6th-arithmetic-operations/cc-6th-order-of-operations/e/order_of_operations_2.
It'll help you to figure out how to do (1/2 x² + 3y - 6) + 6.
Yeah, but we only covered part of it.
oh ok
They also have an algebra course at Khan Academy if you need to review stuff.
ok
I want to learn Venn Diagram
You too. Sorry, have to go.
gn
simplify the top
notice that the co-efficients are the sum from 1 to n of the integers
Yea actually I did simplify
But the problem in coming afterwards
I m a bit confused how to solved the next step
what did you simplify it to?
can you write down your simplified form, I dont understand
they did [x] = x - {x} where {x} is the fractional part of x
Hmm? Should I send the pic how I simplified
yes
Yea I think its 6
no its 5
Ohh shouldn't the value approach to the next number
im still thinking about it
Yup take ur time
Just make x a big integer
What method did u apply
You get lim x -> infty of like Cx for some constant C
Im asking if the limit is supposeed to exist or not
oh
Answer is x/2
just $$\frac{\sum_{k=1}^n\lfloor kx\rfloor}{n}\cdot\frac{1}{n}\geq\frac{\lfloor x\rfloor}{n}$$
c squared
Lol that works too
if n is variable, thats a different story
For that you can note that the numerator is bounded by the sum of all integers up to n + n
Okay can any of you sum up the solution
I actually cant get it like this
This should work
so if n is fixed and x --> infinity, then the limit diverges because of this
their solution is that your problem andor answer is wrong looks like
Ill leave this to you guys
Anyone wanna fry there brain by answering the 3n+1 equation
no go ahead and explain it pappa lol
thought you were saying it diverged with this
nobody wants to try to solve collatz conjecture lol
Sorry I m might sound dumb but I cant help with anything here
I can just tell that sandwich theorem is applied in it
As it should its too trivial
obviously
Im new to math and my school is just teaching domain functions and relations idk shit
I understand the graph but nothing else
Guyss help?
thats cool. were trying to help kaizen tho
Ight
The version of the problem that you gave is wrong given the answer that you gave to be correct
What the question
So im assuming that the problem is to look at the limit when n tends to infinity
Yesss sorry
Its n tends to infinity
I didnt see the mistake
Sorry for the trouble
I m soo soo sorry
When this is the case, we note that the numerator can be written as a $\left(\sum_{i=1}^n ix\right) + \sum_{i=1}^n {ix}$
Pappa
Now the first sum is easy to evaluate and ill leave that to you
Hmm hm okay
So now we want an upper and a lower bound for the second sum
Note that the fractional part of ix is at most 1 and at least 0
Yup
So when the numerator is as large as possible that sum is n
And as small as possible, it is 0
Now calculate the limits in both of these cases and you should be able to conclude by the squeeze theorem
Okayy thankss I got it 😁
Thanks for ur time
Np
hey so im doing a question
find the equation of the vertical line passing through (-1,5)
can anyone help
can some1 help me understand Pythagoras theory
u mean Pythagorean theory
yes
there isn't really a function describing this
wdym?
do you know what the vertical line test is?
thats exactly my point. what slope would you use to even get a vertical line?
wait so do i find the gradient first?
you literally cant
its a vertical line
the gradient is rise over run. there is no run. its rise over zero
oh wait. i may have misinterpreted this
says eqn not function
answer is ||x = -1||
equations dont have to pass the vertical line test in general
meh i hate that
find the equation of the vertical line passing through (-1,5)
so what
is x=-1
the answer
??????????????
]
I already posted the answer above, but the thought process is that vertical lines take the form x = c, where c is a constant
and the provided point has the x value of -1
dont you first have to do y=mx+b and then put (-1,5) in it
no, thats for lines that actually are functions
this is not a function, and wont fit in that form
it says i need to find the equation tho
a vertical line is the only time a line cant be written as y = mx+b though
yes, x = -1 is an equation
Can someone explain to me how to find the minimum or the maximum point of a quadratic equation? I used to be able to do it but I’ve forgotten
-b/(2a)
where the quadratic is written ax^2 + bx + c
yes
Ive completely forgotten
Absolutely forgotten everything ffs
So for example,
y=2x^2 + 7x + 12
To find the minimum point
then the vertex is at -(7)/(2(2)) = -7/4
What is vertex again?
if I were to find the coordinates how am I to do that
well you know x = -7/4
Oh
so what f(-7/4)?
yes
👍
also once you get to calculus (for generally finding min and max of any function), the keyword is critical points
assuming that first question wasnt about calc
yeah thats calculus
yeah the calculus way is finding the critical point(s)
is the 16 the entire bottom or just the right
how do i express this formula as a function? there are 2 inputs
(16+x)(v) = 112
i dont think its enough information without knowing the entire bottom
if thats the case then its either not enough information or it means that 16yd is the whole bottom
basically you can factorise ( b^4 a^4 ) - ( a^3 b^5 ) into (b^4 a^3)(a-b)
yeah but how
u can use the bot
no idea how im new lol
me too help
$(b^4a^4)-(a^3b^5)$
EDEN
wait so
$a(b^4 a^3)
are you just basically taking out an a-b
$a(b^4 a^3)$
qWeb
yeah quite literally lol
and then on 2nd part
$b(b^4 a^3)$
qWeb
and if you minus each one you get
basically its
first take away 2nd
then you get
i can miss sister
$(a-b)(b^4 a^3)$
qWeb
got it
wait what
i got you hunty
qWeb
i can help u with that
= $(a-b)(b^4 a^3)$
qWeb
OHHHHHHH
thats tea mama but idc
omg I teached someone lets go

sis idk wym

<@&268886789983436800>
But why not
b&
Ur not the real nicki Minaj
yes i am?
Can u unban those two cuz I feel sad for them
can someone exain why its out of 4 cards and not 5?
where?
@alpine sable
I mean, there are only 4 aces, jacks etc in a deck
so like, you first chose which of the 4 aces you hand will have
then which 3 out of 4 jacks
it states there consistin of 5 cards
yes
but do you understand what I wrote next?
not talking to u stfu
go in the channel where no one is asking questions
how would you use poisson approximation to calculate the probability in dice rolls?
!callidus
If you've never seen factoring methods before, I suggest YouTube as a video can teach this one faster then I can.
Ok thank you :)
But in general you want to find two numbers that have a product of 60, and a sum of -16
What's the name of this i don't know the English term
"Factoring quadratics"
Dude..... You are litterly an angel thank you
Haha happy to point you in a good direction. Feel free to ask if you have any questions about it
is there a way to write a function in desmos i can use recursively that gives me this result? here are the first 4 iterations
Is there a shorter formula than this?
f(i)=a(f(i-1)+b*f(i-2)), i>=3
i>=2, not >=3
f(0)=a, f(1)=a(a+b)
Hey, can someone help me solve this without trigonometry:
ABC is an isosceles triangle. BC= 25cm and angle bAC = 90 degrees
i) what is the length of AB
have you tried anything with it?
The definition of function 'f' cannot depend on 'f'.
sigh
I think I'm supoussed to solve this using the Pythagoras theorem
c^2 = a^2 + b^2
kk
sorry for misunderstanding
If your question has not been answered for a minimum of 15 minutes, you may use the Helpers tag once. Please do not try to bump your question using this ping unnecessarily. Do not abuse this ping. Do not individually ping users with the Helpers tag without their express permission.
@alpine sable what's troubling you with these?
so for c, i am getting 5 + i / 26
yes
okay yes, and what's the issue?
the textbook answers say its meant to be 1/26
the imaginary part of (5+i)/26 is 1/26, that's right
oh
ohhh
ok
soryr
just a misunderstanding
thnaks
@vale wigeon Hey, when i'm conerting a complex number to cartesian form, am i allowed to make the value inside the cos and isin brackets negative
for example is my argument was -1.05, could i put it in the brackets as both pi+-1.05 and -1.05, or just the first option
Okay, so for a
the modulus is arctan (7/(-4))
which is -1.05
i mean argument
sorry
the modulus is 8.06
oh you mean trigonometric form
so can i put that as 8.06[cos(-1.05)+isin(-1.05)]
the angle inside both functions needs to be the same of course
adding pi is inappropriate
you would be adding 2pi rather than pi anyway... and that's if your class takes arguments to be between 0 and 2pi instead of -pi and pi
okay, so does -1.05 work for that problem?
cus the textbook says the argument should be 2.09
which is pi + the argument
alright
oh you just used arctan without concern for the quadrant...
it's in the second quadrant
while the arctan gave you an angle in the fourth
add pi to compensate
oh okay
i c
so these are the answers for this particular section of working
im a bit confused
principal values
not sure what you mean with without knowing the function. But using product rule and then a sub should do the trick for example
i don't get it
does it look like lim x -> a of (f(x)-f(a)) / (x-a) for some function f and real number a ?
@rocky spindle
no
what if it was (x sinx - 0) / (x-pi)
Ah yes it could be
So derivate xsinx and substitute x with pi might also work
differentiate*
Ok
But I think doing this is faster than differentiate
could be
$\lim_{x\to\pi}\frac{x\sin{x}}{x-\pi}\
\lim_{x\to\pi}-x\left(\frac{\sin(x-\pi)}{x-\pi}\right)\
\lim_{x\to\pi}-x\
-\pi$
Muzan Jackson
hey so
If we can have R^n dimensional spaces, we also can have higher dimensions figures right?
Idk if figures is the correct word
so, how could we calculate the volume of a tesseract for example?
and what branch of math does it fall into?
geometry
i think so
ah
also, if x^2 is the area of a square, x^3 is the volume of a cube. what does x^n represent? for n > 3
would it be correct to say
x^n. ∀ n > 3
Can anybody explain to me what is rate
Hello can anybody help me with a problem?
I need help with this question
https://dontasktoask.com generally
in this case, the channel is occupied, so no
Channel 2
hi guys does anyone know how to solve this?
Hi all, I’m very new here. I need help calculating and summarizing the relationship in packing density between two differently sized cylinders. This is for the real life application of managing the waste stream for a covid-19 diagnostic testing lab. Currently there is a nationwide shortage of 30 gallon poly propylene barrels and my lab is trying to evaluate the difference in dry waste storage capability with a larger sized barrel (50gal). I tried googling a little but couldn’t really find a helpful explanation. Any help is greatly appreciated, and I can move to another channel!
Arrogant of me to assume everyone is from US also*
There is a US shortage
There's like 4 people interrupting each other in this channel
Well I was first :P
umm I've tried doing simutaneous
with sin as displacement
and cos as velocity
but I figured that was too complicated and there are simpler methods
x= a sin( kt) and v = ak cos (kt)
so do I simutaneously solve 4 different equations?
yeah
not t
just k and a
I don't know how to incorporate x and v in the same equation
cuz 20 = a sin (kt) when 30= ak cos(kt)
would these be simutaneously solved?
It says that h>50m and i have to prove it
Occupied
I'm gonna have to think about this, it's been a while since I did shm
You might have better luck in discord.gg/physics
Any way you could help me please if you are done with that? @alpine sable
I tried #2
if x is traveling 10 kph in a constant speed and z is running at 15 kph and y is undefined what is the speed of y
the distance between x and y is 2 and y and z is 3
x + 2 = z - 3 = 12 is the best I can do
actually 12 is the correct answer
ok another one
this one is harder
hol on nvm im stupid
Ok thx!
2+2=5
Hi Could someone help me in this exercise?
Which of the following expressions is (are) rational (s)?
ii is 13.
To figure out if something is a rational, attempt to reduce the expression as much as possible
rationalise the denominators where you can and expand where you can.
how to find HCF?
@alpine sable Do you know how to find remainders after dividing?
i have helped
someone asked using my id
algebra tiles? also don't ping everyone
wtf are algebra tiles supposed to be
you're probably better off looking at general methods for factorisation
i guess
https://www.sd43.bc.ca/Resources/ParentResources/math/10/Documents/factoring simple trinomails using algebra tiles.pdf
is semi-decent for "tiles"
OMG TYSM
Nice try
for the 2 questions x^2<-6x-12 and x^2>-12x-39, one answer is no solution and one answer is all real numbers
but both are not factorable
why does one have no solution and one is all real numbers?
sequences and series
they are usually taught in calculus 1
in the US at least
never mind, it's actually taught in calculus 2
although this is actually a little simpler than that, you'll probably learn how to solve this in precalculus
as long as you know what an arithmetic sequence is, you should have a general idea of how to approach this problem
usman, do you know what a derivative is?
yee so ill show how i got 5/6
f(x) = x^1/6 - 2x^-1/3
f'(x) = 1/6 x^ -5/6 + 2/3 x^-4/3
at x =1
f'(x) =1/6 +2/3
f'(x) = 5/6
and for -1
why are you getting the slope for -1?
so then y = 5/6 (x - 1) - 1
when i will simplify that i get the answer 5/6x-11/6
cause it should be -1
you'll have a point and a slope
so use the point slope equation
(y - y1) = m(x - x1)
ah i see, yes that looks fine
yes and i got -1
(sqrt(1) - 2)/cuberoot(1)
= -1
like this now
$(sqrt(1) - 2)/cuberoot(1)$
Usman
y-y1=d/dx(at x=1)(x-x1) , find x1 and y1 but putting x =1 in the equation
can i distribute a limit among two functions that are added?
like can lt[f(x)+g(x)] be lt f(x) + lt g(x)
Yes, assuming both exist
\sqrt{}
\frac{}{}
and \sqrt[3]{} for cube root
f(x) = x^1/6 - 2x^-1/3
f'(x) = 1/6 x^ -5/6 + 2/3 x^-4/3
at x =1
f'(x) =1/6 +2/3
f'(x) = 5/6
and (sqrt(1) - 2)/cuberoot(1)
= -1
from there
y = 5/6 (x - 1) - 1
simplify
get answer 5/6x-11/6
would anyone mind helping me with factoring polynomials in algebra 2?
I'm doing khan academy right now
I can try
mainly just with some factoring
it's fine
what's the specific question?
I just actually need some help with identifying quadratic patterns
like what formula does this equation use
or something along those lines
can you send a screenshot?
okay one sec
that is the kinda question I'm currently stumped on
@surreal meadow
have you tried factoring it and seeing if it fits either pattern?
let me try that right now
see that's the part I don't really understand
is the factoring part
do you know how to factor?
yes
I'm just confused on where to like start
like starting out by finding a gcf between the values?
we're interested in the following patterns
(a + b)^2
(a - b)^2
(a + b)(a - b)
now, expand those expressions
and see what you get in terms of a and b
(u + v)^2 gives us that, yeah
okay
now before you expand the rest
@novel crag
give us a second
we're working through it
see if the expression you have above
fits that pattern
I think it does
so what are the values of U and V?
yep
Ohh
so what would the answer be
so the first answer is correct right?
Nice
yes
but once you get more comfortable with factoring and the patterns present, you can factor and then deduce the pattern
oh okay
so for now, just do what I just idd
did*
how can I do a question like this?
so far I just defined each of the values in the most likely formula
u^2 - v^2
and I know that u = x^2 and v = 3
but how can I thoroughly check to see which pattern it is?
@surreal meadow
well you know that if you expand (a + b)^2 you'll get 3 terms
and same with (a - b)^2
but you only have 2 terms
so that can't be it
so it's impossible to have either of those patterns
but how can I check to see if the perfect square formula works or not?
what do you mean by perfect square formula?
oh wait
nvm
I meant the u^2 - v^2
formula
how can I check to see if that works
do you mean (u+v)(u-v)
yh
ohh so no patterns would work
yeah
but we only want integer/single variable solutions
ohhh okay
that makes sense
so I have to use a bit of logic for these kinda questions
yes
alright
in another question if you had x^4-9, to realise it can be factored, you need to recognise that x^4 and 9 are both squares
its called difference of two squares
(only possible with a minus sign)
yes I know that formula
thank you for letting me know about that though
how can I factor x^4 - 14x^2 + 49?
(x^2-7)^2
since you can't have anything that multiplies to 49 and adds to 14x^2, but if it were just 14x, you could factor it as -7x - 7x
can you explain how you got that answer though?
expanding (a+b)^2 gives you a^2+2ab+b^2
yes
so if we compare it, -14=2ab and b^2=49
ohhh
okay
I got it now
let me do this problem
alright, I got the question correct. Thank you to @primal ether and @surreal meadow !
you could always also solve the equation x^4 - 14x^2 + 49 by putting t=x^2 and getting t^2-14t+49=0 then you get t=7 then (t-7)(t-7) or (x^2-7)^2
I understand the question now. Thank you to you too.
876897402555080794
a right trialngle size would look something like this?
6,7,13
that is not a right triangle
If they are Pythagorean triplets , then am they do form right triangle
i don't even think its a triangle 
10,60,61?
is there a more specific question you had in mind?
do you know the pythagorean theorem?
yes, do you know what it means though?
quick question that wont get in the way, whats the english term for opening brackets and manipulating the values around, can i say develop?
please ask in another unoccupied channel
I know it works with 2d shapes
look up the pythagorean theorem and what it means
writing exponents is done like this a^x btw 🙂
I know but thanks for letting me know 😃
oh okay 😄
a theorem attributed to Pythagoras that the square of the hypotenuse of a right triangle is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides.
so it has to be either B or D?
Yeah it's one of them
do you know how to factor?
uhm yea
3andak dits fries
@surreal meadow what
you want to factor that polynomial into (x-a)(x-b)(x-c)
or it might be (2x-a)(x-...
but you want to write the polynomial as the product of three terms (ax-b)
this way you can solve for different values of x that will make the polynomial equal to 0
Use factor theorem
only used to doing it with 3
?
So because x-2 is a factor (im assuming)
you divide the polynomial by (x-2)
with algebraic division or by inspection
you're supposed to do that
Sorry was looking at wrong q
hm?
i.e., we're not going to factor it for you
ik
it's best if you learn how to do it yourself
Substitute values of x in until you get something that equals 0
if I know the first one I'll understand
sub values of x in until the polynomial = 0
what?
Search up Factor Theorem
@surreal meadow yo I think I got it?
wow
now how do I solve the x
sarcasm?
are you sure x=2 is a solution?
oh i misread the question
Looks good
yh
that's your solution set
yes
it's the same type of question
oh factoring
but this time the two sides aren't the same
so what type of factoring would I use
@surreal meadow
wdym?
that's hwhat I have
but I can't take the common factor out of the two pairs
then group it together
like the prev question
so how do I do it now
@surreal meadow
stop pinging me pls
if you want a quick method
then find a value of x that makes that equal to 0
and then divide the polynomial by (x-a)
where a is that value
it isn't in cubic polynomial form though
usman this is occupied
like in the notes
wdym
or do this
i don't know what your notes are
.
they describe how to solve this in there
when i put the equation into desmos the graph isnt the same, idk what im doing wrong
yes looks good
It's probably the same, it's the y axis scale. In desmos, you're scaled to 20000, while the other plot, the max y is 10
Math HL Year 2 and we are doing a review and i don't remember anything :((
#5 a) where do i start?
Just plug the solution into the differential equation
With the derivative on the left hand side
So substitute y on the right side for the solution?
Yep
i think they'd rather you show it works by integrating rather than plugging it in
that's what i recall from my hl class but i may be wrong
Yeah i tried to plug it in but idk if it's working out
I also tried integrating but i didn't get an e anywhere from 2x-y
Silly question here. Does anyone have any tricks to doing quick math such as finding the decimal for 2.5/75?
Currently studying for the MCAT, and this is simply just stuff i relied on my calculator to do.
2.5/75-> 25/750 -> 5/150 -> 1/30
decimals are essentially fractions, and fractions can be simplified until the numerator and denominator are coprime
Sounds good. I often forget that you can make the fraction easier to deal with beforehand. Thanks
they aren't treating y as a function of x there, just a constant
the integral calculator won't work for differential equations i don't think
I think you can do $\frac{dy}{dx} +y = 2x$
RipeOrange
Then multiple both sides by $$e^{\int 1 ,dx}$$
RipeOrange
Multiply*
Then you'll get $\frac{d}{dx}(y \cdot e^x)=2xe^x$
Which you can integrate
RipeOrange
Ohh wow okay tysm!
Np
If an angle bisector is also an altitude, would the two parts of the side that it split be equal?
Lemme sketch a quick diagram
a and b are angles, x and y are sides.
Another thing, am I then allowed to assume that r = s
Actually nvm I think I got something
I can just use AA similarity :P
It's (5000, 2.57) in desmos but the other one doesn't have 5k
Algebra 1:
What is 15x^5 x^8 / 90x^12 ?
Evaluate and explain pls
Eat water it's good
Could you start off with simplifying?
look up the laws of exponents
Like I’m learning this but I can’t understand it
I mean I understand the simple ones but not like that
what about it is confusing?
solve $x^5 \times x^8$
eis
Oh
Perhaps rewriting would help?
Perhaps
eat water is right, group up the like numbers/algebraic terms.
Eat water it's good
Do you see what you have to do?
Yea
Alrighty
^^
budi, select an empty channel
and delete your question.
Well, my teacher said that I had to simplify 15/90 which would be 1/6. But I really didn’t know what to do with the exponents on the top. I thought I had to add them but I know now that I have to multiply them
what is 2+2
Keep in mind that exponents are just repeated multiplication.
Sorry, I cannot give a full answer. Do you know how to count to 10? That could be a start.
XD
it seems that you should review the laws of exponents, and like eat water said, exponents are just repeated multiplication
Supposedly Mathway said that the answer to the question I asked was x/6
no, i can only count to 5
Crypt, also, consider what you're dealing with here. you are dealing with two things
the variable x and integers.
we can separate our concerns.
Yea
but, fundamentally, maximo is correct. solve this question then review laws of exponents.
Ahh, learn that then you can come back to troll later.
ok
What do I do with the bottom though? It says I have to multiply 90 by x^12
90 * x^12 = 90x^12
no, what the denominator is saying is that there is a number 90x^2
Bruh XD
it's not instructing you of anything.
Eat water it's good
^^^
So it would be 1x^40/6x^12?
Eat water it's good
Review your exponent stuff, as maximo said.
$x^a \cdot x^b = x^{a+b}$
No, you multiply the terms
maximo
review exponent laws
but just because you multiply the terms doesnt mean the exponents get multiplied
This table looks useful:
Eat water it's good
Like I said I know most of it but the quotient ones are just kinda complicated for me
Where the first thing is x a's and the second is y a's
Eat water it's good
Did you get that?
Yes
Eat water it's good
Cool, then you could use that in your problem
Eat water it's good
ahh keep forgetting the {} for 12
And I simplify 15/90?
Yeah
K so it should be 1/6x^28?
X^40
Noo
.
product rule.
what's x^5 * x^8?
X^13 🤦♂️
So x/6?
yep
Eat water it's good
np
Sorry if i was being a complete idiot XD
I have trouble understanding things quickly
